i liked quackwatch until they tried to use "catholic" science to disprove reiki-if 1 is skeptical of energy healing, 1 certainly would not defend their position with the kings of quackery-christianity-you know-insestial beginnings of humans,talking snakes and burning bushes, don't 4get the "miracles"! members of organized religion have no place in rational skepticism!
Unless you can provide evidence that corroborates the food mixing "theory" presented in "Fit for life", then it will remain in the domain of quackery since it is pure speculation.
Quackwatch's article even presents reasons why the Fit for Life "theory" has no basis to it, even though the burden of proof didn't rest on them.
It's unfortunate that the Fit for Life scammers decided to mix in vegetarianism...Onision should really chose his source better.
Mixing carbohydrates with meat makes you fat? That can easily be proved by reading any book on nutrition. Why should you trust Quackwatch any more than Fit For Life? Maybe they have their own ulterior motives. Who's to say that Quackwatch is any more correct than Fit for Life?
Quackwatch's article writers are usually medical and nutritional professionals, in the proper sense of the word since they actually have a real formal education.
I just looked through the Fit for Life magazines, and although they are titled "Health Science", there is nothing scientific in them: no research papers and no data or experimental protocols accompanying the claims they make.
And regarding your claim that mixing meat and starch makes you fat: provide peer reviewed sources please.
I'm fully aware and in agreement that man is an omnivore, I just hate ever seeing QW used as a reference for anything. I'd use articles they list that are not authored by the members instead. Just a suggestion to boost credibility.
the thing is there onision had not brought any evidence other than from a magazine, news article he got
journalists always have their newsletter bias in their best interest and wont give out proper evidence they like to make up things that will sound in favor for the parties they belong in, check fox news which makes their motives blatantly obvious
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The fact is, it doesn't matter if we're herbivores or omnivores, the fact is that we can choose not to eat animals. We can make that choice quite easily without sacrifice.
I'd really love to discuss that further, but the last time I tried you didn't approve my comments on your videos or you would just reply with one-liners and links.
It's true, kangarooelaine. We can choose not to eat animals. I choose to eat animals and when I eventually go to hell as Onision says, I'll then have even more fire to grill all that delicious meat! See, we can agree and get along! =)
lol that shit looked like a cookbook
kilkolio 1 month ago
@kilkolio, you're not far from the truth. It contained vegetarian recipes, anecdotes and small articles bitching about "big pharma".
No research though.
easuter 1 month ago
galactic domination? this guy is the reason aliens didnt contact us yet cuz there's no intelligent life on earth to be reported
kilkolio 1 month ago
i liked quackwatch until they tried to use "catholic" science to disprove reiki-if 1 is skeptical of energy healing, 1 certainly would not defend their position with the kings of quackery-christianity-you know-insestial beginnings of humans,talking snakes and burning bushes, don't 4get the "miracles"! members of organized religion have no place in rational skepticism!
3642130 2 years ago
Of course you guys will say all this stuff is "quackery" just so you can justify your meat-eating lifestyles.
stephjuhler999 2 years ago
Unless you can provide evidence that corroborates the food mixing "theory" presented in "Fit for life", then it will remain in the domain of quackery since it is pure speculation.
Quackwatch's article even presents reasons why the Fit for Life "theory" has no basis to it, even though the burden of proof didn't rest on them.
It's unfortunate that the Fit for Life scammers decided to mix in vegetarianism...Onision should really chose his source better.
easuter 2 years ago
Mixing carbohydrates with meat makes you fat? That can easily be proved by reading any book on nutrition. Why should you trust Quackwatch any more than Fit For Life? Maybe they have their own ulterior motives. Who's to say that Quackwatch is any more correct than Fit for Life?
stephjuhler999 2 years ago
Quackwatch's article writers are usually medical and nutritional professionals, in the proper sense of the word since they actually have a real formal education.
I just looked through the Fit for Life magazines, and although they are titled "Health Science", there is nothing scientific in them: no research papers and no data or experimental protocols accompanying the claims they make.
And regarding your claim that mixing meat and starch makes you fat: provide peer reviewed sources please.
easuter 2 years ago
I'm fully aware and in agreement that man is an omnivore, I just hate ever seeing QW used as a reference for anything. I'd use articles they list that are not authored by the members instead. Just a suggestion to boost credibility.
trulyheaven777 2 years ago
yeah steph that sounds sane. perfectly normal and perfectly logical response. no psychopathologies in your life at all i would say. perfectly healthy
threadysparrow 2 years ago
@stephjuhler999 lol. I just had a chicken sandwich. It was delicious.
moonlightkisu 1 month ago
@stephjuhler999
looks like someone cant bear the truth about her hero
kilkolio 1 month ago
@stephjuhler999
the thing is there onision had not brought any evidence other than from a magazine, news article he got
journalists always have their newsletter bias in their best interest and wont give out proper evidence they like to make up things that will sound in favor for the parties they belong in, check fox news which makes their motives blatantly obvious
kilkolio 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
watch?v=iACDNNtITEs
kangarooelaine 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The fact is, it doesn't matter if we're herbivores or omnivores, the fact is that we can choose not to eat animals. We can make that choice quite easily without sacrifice.
kangarooelaine 2 years ago
Hi Crazy Pen Lady :)
I'd really love to discuss that further, but the last time I tried you didn't approve my comments on your videos or you would just reply with one-liners and links.
So no point really...
easuter 2 years ago
Yeah, you're right. No point in brevity, links to scientific studies or anything like that...
kangarooelaine 2 years ago
"links to scientific studies or anything like that... "
Like onision's supposed "scientific" sources that I exposed in this video?
Keep your pseudo-science to yourself.
easuter 2 years ago
It's true, kangarooelaine. We can choose not to eat animals. I choose to eat animals and when I eventually go to hell as Onision says, I'll then have even more fire to grill all that delicious meat! See, we can agree and get along! =)
Gindelbi 2 years ago 6
We can choose to do a lot of things. I am unable to come up with any arguments as to why I shouldn't eat meat.
LaCerca 2 years ago
Thank you very much for this video. I think I will add an annotation on mine linking to this.
antybu86 2 years ago 4
No problem :)
easuter 2 years ago
I'll be updating my video as well. Thanks for the video.
atheistvstheist 2 years ago