Added: 5 years ago
From: moni123s
Views: 591,296
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,216)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'd hate to Just be driving down some road and randomly see this o_O

  • Thats the most comforting secure sound it the world.

  • where was the siloh?

  • WMP: Weapon of Mass Peacekeeping

  • How does it pop out of the silo like that?

  • @MrZw69 Compressed air. It's called a cold launch, unlike the Minuteman that lights the engine and blasts out of the silo.

  • Stupid to call a ICBM "Peacekeeper"...

  • @KRaikkonenSF it worked didn't it?

  • @JPSwissCheese Sure... And "Satana" is not much better ;)

  • @KRaikkonenSF It kept the peace for all the years it was operational, didn't it?

  • @KRaikkonenSF stupid to use "a" instead of "an"

  • @micheltariq So stupid to write such a stupid comment !

  • nnnniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiicccccccc­eeeeee !!!!!!!!!!

  • yeah so pretty much well get fucked if women made our weapons

  • ist das ein nuklearsprengkopf oder nur eine attrappe?

  • peace keeper? more like hell raiser

  • Comment removed

  • Russia, prepare your anus.

  • Where was this shot? Looks like Montana or Wyoming...

  • No, rickcain, they would not. That's just stereotypical nonsense. They'd look like handbags. Or shoes.....

  • too bad they took these out of service. especially now when russia's nuclear force has higher yield MIRVS on new missiles. we maintain old ones while the ruskis are building newer ones? fuck you obama, see what being a pussy does to our security>

  • Oh lord, this was launched on my birthday, November 5th! :O

  • HOW AN ICBM CAN BE Peacekeeper !?!?! WTF

  • @GravityPowerful Great nations wont be fighting soon.. you know why? Because they are afraid of the consequences of their mistakes.

    It's a necessary evil...

  • @GravityPowerful What Kuti said. All major powers have some type of Nuclear arsenal, basically, everyone has their finger on the button saying "If you attack we'll fire a warheads". This is why an atomic war is unlikely, most nations with nuclear arms, have the common sense not to fire one, places like North Korea, or Iran (Who is working to acquire warheads) do not.

  • @GravityPowerful However, they are terrified at what the UN (Mainly United States, United Kingdome, France, Germany and Russia) will do to them if a missile launch is even detected.

  • @GravityPowerful The original name was to be Peacemaker. They PCed it.

  • "I would love to have the launch and detonation codes to ALL of these missles, especiall the MIRV's!"

  • @MrWINNSLAW Right... Might be 15 years too late for you, but they were 00000000 ;)

  • Subtitles: Spufff...........Prrrrrrrrrrrr­rrrrrrrrrrrooroarrrrrrrrrrrr..­.............

  • i live in an upland part of NYS i think im good, still this is no good!!!

  • @BuBzIeNYNY Yea, you might be fine there, I live 15 miles from the largest powerplant on the eastern seaboard. Toast.

  • i see no explosion....wtf? LoL

  • @OmegasEdge ...your joking right?

  • this is the stupidest name for a weapon...

  • @fedrosspy

    It's the perfect name for a weapon like this because it does exactly what the title suggests, it keeps the peace..it stops idiot countries from doing stupid things because they know what will happen otherwise.

  • @CynicalVision Saudai Arabia must have never seen this video.

    Saudai Arabia sent 19 hijackers to the USA on 911 and got away with murdering 3000 innocent people.

  • If women designed our weapons, would they all look like vaginas instead of penises?

  • @rickcain2320 If women designed our weapons we would have been conquered long ago.

  • @rickcain2320 i hope so... XD

  • @rickcain2320 pressure waves look like breasts, woman have nothing to complain about.

  • @rickcain2320 They wouldn't work...

  • @rickcain2320 Sweet Jesus man! I almost choked! ^^

  • @rickcain2320 GENIUS!

  • @rickcain2320

    Not if they needed to fly.

  • @rickcain2320 penis weapons the way to go when tryin to shag the enemy

  • @rickcain2320

    penises were designed to fuck shit, so weapons are designed after them.

  • ICBM, delivery in 30 minutes or less or the next ones free

  • Comment removed

  • @4eVaShia Do not share classified information with youtube users. The feds monitor military oriented forums and look for that kind of sierra...

  • @KobraSahin Stupid Turk..The Rocketry as a science was pioneered in America by Dr.Robert Goddard in 1920's and von Braun has profited from it hugely..Look at yourself ,your army can't even handle 5.000 kurdish rebels and is officially defeated. Without American F-16's , you would be even less defenceless than Libya.

  • @barracuda7018 damn u told him

  • @barracuda7018 Yeah, but they have the best hash as long as you don't get caught and go to a turkish prison.

  • Greeting's Mother Fucker!..

  • *plop*...*fart*

  • that was Polaris

  • FLY PELICAN FLY

  • Chuck Norris uses the Peacekeeper as firecracker to celebrate 4th of july

  • @4eVaShia

    Maybe you should ask your step-father again how it's being done ;-) The MX carried up to 10 warheads each of them in it's own reentry vehicle. The 10 RVs were released and reentered the earths athmosphere independently. There is a pretty good animation of a Minuteman III flight: watch?v=2aHpqqhaHJ

    Just imagine that the last rocket stage releases 10 RVs instead of just one.

  • why too fucking short!!

  • @Avarim

    It's obvious... IT FARTS !

  • what was that one nuclear?

  • @punkyboy2

    If I'm not mistaken, the peacemaker can carry several nukes in its'payload; when it reaches orbit, its' shell split apart to disperse these nukes over a wide area.

  • @melvinthedeathless Peace keeper can hold up to 12 warheads. under the START treaty we were only allowed 10... but we do not use them anymore... I used to build Nuclear Missiles Minuteman 3 in Montana

  • @keeshateachphet thats absolute right - RS20/SS-18 could hold up to 24MIRV under Start russia were only allowed 10 - 4tons Payload Peacekeeper 8tons RS20/SS-18

  • @punkyboy2 no.. we do not launch missiles with live warheads. this was just a test

  • @KobraSahin: "We wanted to see the world spared another conflict such as Germany had just been through, and we felt that only by surrendering such a weapon to people who are guided by the Bible could such an assurance to the world be best secured." We defeated Germany without von Braun. Just to let you know.

  • Holy shit i just jizzed

  • how does the ICBM get out of its silo?

  • @Avarim the first explosion you see where it pops out is steam. there is a fire generator inside the silo that boils thousands of gallons of water instantly, using the steam as pressure the missile then bursts out and ignites

  • anyone else find the fact that an ICBM is called a "peacemaker"? LOL

  • @alexkvaskov PeaceKEEPER. It keeps the peace by making it so that anyone who'd attack would be hurt as badly, if not worse.

    The PeaceMAKER was the B-36 bomber of the 1950s, which was a ludicrous name related to the fact that Curtis LeMay was an insane "bomb them back to the Stone Age" type...

  • @rdfox76 Wow, no shit, sherlock, I kinda realized that as being part of MAD.

  • Пиписькер.

  • pong, BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMM

  • we need to anihilate the enemy in orde to keep peace

  • theres no fins?? how does it stay upright??

  • Comment removed

  • @RadicalMassacre

    Precision machinging, gimballed thrusters, possibly a Reaction Control System too

  • @RadicalMassacre It's tied to a long wire.

  • Comment removed

  • 5 4 3

    Oh shit i forgot to fuel it

  • thats one HELL OF A MODEL ROCKET

  • oh so pretty. so witty and GAY!!

  • Peacekeeper is an accurate name. Imagine what WW3 would be like without nuclear weapons preventing it. A LOT of people would have died in a conventional NATO / Soviet face off. All Nuclear technology has done in the past 70 years is end WW2 faster, prevent WW3 and provide us with clean, efficient electric power.

  • the russians build more missiles and we get rid of the best missile we ever had.

  • You can discern countrys which have a long history and care for their citizen and usa which is no country just a refuge of lost fucks who want to shot guns fuck around.

    just let the population do what they want we do our thing and conquer the globe but never come in our way

    just kill each other thats why they have jails full

    its a big difference to other countrys

    usa is just a war mongering ressource greedy more power hungry evil empire

    and your the seed of it.

    attack me loyal dogs bark HAHA

  • @USCUNTSareOWNEDbyCHN just promise me you wont side with north korea if there is a war please cause if there is a war my generation will be fighting it im only 12 and people like you make things harder for me cause im in constant fear of russia or north korea starting world war 3 and blowing the world apart

  • @USCUNTSareOWNEDbyCHN fuck you.

  • @USCUNTSareOWNEDbyCHN We don't do what ever the fuck we want. We have laws. Disobeying them result in punishment. We don't care how fucked up your laws are but we will never kill a prisner unless he has done one of the worst crimes imanginable.

  • what total brainwashed americunts dont realise is that your government is not interested in your wealth its the land which they attack not the yanke incest scum.

    its about power the game between governments

    you the usual fat burger muncher have nothing to do with this

    so stop saying we no they you worthless piece of trash south slave holders

    everybody who is not already totaly in the media world knows this

    thats why they risk your shity lives and invade others HAHA

    it can be over that quik snip

  • Couple of megatons of democracy

  • @KevinSun242 lol i like that :D

  • Call that "we dead" if we fire this at anyone! I can only imagine the country that fired that would be absolutely disintegrated within minutes. I know I wouldn't hesitate to disintegrate the country.

  • USA: we keep the peace by vaporizing countries.

  • Comment removed

  • imagine this loaded with a hydrogen + atomic bomb.......

  • Mmm... this makes me remember Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker

  • Adults only understand one thing: Consequences!

  • aim this baby at North Korea

  • @Hoganforever lmao. Your bloodlust is exactly the sort of comments I like to see on videos such as this. Just so you know, the peacekeeper was the baddest of the bad in terms of death and destruction with its payload of 10 250 kiloton thermonuclear warheads. A wise man one said "Rome creates a desert and calls it peace." This thing will create that desert and then turn the sand into glass!

  • @LonghornPhysicist So a person that claims to be working for ATK loves to see blood lusting comments... great.. just that sort of people we need working in the space program...

  • @SquirrelFromGradLife I don't appreciate you stalking my comments and who I work for is none of your business.

  • @LonghornPhysicist How dumb are you?.. it was you that claimed you worked at ATK and used that as an argument... Apparently being retarded is a job requirement in the space industry or is it just at ATK?...

    You actually did claim that "we" meaning ATK had tried cross feeding technology before and couldnt get it to work and therefor SpaceX couldnt possibly make it work either.. You said that not me so how dumb and blood lusting are you actually?

  • @LonghornPhysicist actually it did carry 10 MIRV warheads but they were 300 kilotons each.

  • @bobafettfan32 If you say so. :) Keep in mind not everything you read on wikipedia is exactly the truth, especially when it concerns systems manufactured under ITAR :)

  • @LonghornPhysicist I know this not from Wikipedia, but from a friend who was a missile maintenance tech that worked on the Minuteman III and The Peace Keeper. The Minuteman III at one time was a 3 MIRV ICBM and each of those MIRVS were 300-330 kilotons each.

  • @LonghornPhysicist russia...ss-18 satan-10 550, to 750 kiloton warheads or one 20 megaton warhead.-u.s...mx or peacekeeper missile-10 475 kiloton, 500 kiloton, or 10 megaton warhead---who wins being that russia has less people........................­............nobody?

  • @LonghornPhysicist your my hero lol

  • @LonghornPhysicist ..standard yeild warhead is 550 kiloton...just saying..

  • @LonghornPhysicist this isn't any kind of soviet fanboyism, you're just wrong. the SALT II agreement placed limitations on the number of warheads a missile could carry, but the r-36/ss-18 has a ridiculous throw weight, and could theoretically carry 38 × 250 kt yield, 24 × 500 kt yield, or 15–17 × 1 Mt yield, as well as FOBS capability which would place a payload into an orbit, giving it unlimited range

  • @LonghornPhysicist: The russian RS-20 Vojevoda as example can carry 8, 800 kiloton thermonuclear warheads. The Peacekeeper is a toy compared to this.

  • peacekepper?? huh

  • @LeeehHemogenim yeh, without these missiles a country is vulnerable to attack via another country who may have such weapons.

  • dear santa.........

  • Will it blend ? xD

  • Only on earth are peace keepers designed as ballistic systems capable of destruction. When on earth will humanity address the war machine profit structures that perpetuate war as the message for peace.

  • Peace is our profession, war is just a hobby.

  • hey i see some orion tech here

  • peacekeeper? really?

  • @pierceys234 There has not been a nuclear weapon used since 1945. I call that peace.

  • @ExtremePeppers it's the name of the weapon i don't understand your comment...and many nuclear weapons have been used since then just not on people

  • @pierceys234 The simple fact the no major player in the arms race during the Cold War wanted to be the first to launch a weapon is the reason we had peace. The WARSAW Pact and NATO both knew life would not exsist in a nuclear war.Its called MAD- Mutual Assured Destruction. Reagan out spent the USSR in the final leg of the Cold War. It was all about who has the money to win. We did..By a hair.

  • @ExtremePeppers its really ironic that Japan pulled a fukushima and nuked itself.

  • @datzfast Are you saying a natural disaster is "Nuking" yourself?

  • @ExtremePeppers LOL Are you thinking a natural disaster is nuking yourself?

  • @datzfast Are you talking about the earthquake and the power plant? Thats the only topic I could see about nuking yourself? The bombs America dropped in 1945 were not wanted by Japan. I doubt the people of those two cities really wanted to be the first to try it out.

  • @pierceys234 Yes, mutually assured destruction. You start a war with me, I nuke the hell out of you, you nuke the hell out of me we're both dead.

    No one wants to start a war because it kills both countries not just one. So yes, a crude peace keeper.

  • @Mrxb0x oh well most governments don't care about civilians anyways..you are right

  • @pierceys234 ICBM ass penetrator would be better

  • @pierceys234 Mainly because the enemy disappears within 45 minutes any place on this planet after pissing off the right Man down range. .

  • @bodacious2109 at this time the "right Man" has disappeared

  • @MrMegacurie I don't think so... he's just out back reloading.

  • @bodacious2109 but i think so

  • @MrMegacurie So... the stalemate continues (stay tune as the story developes).

  • @pierceys234 you had probably many replies but i must add one more. Yes, Peacekeeper is quite proper name in fact. You won't start a full-scale attack at USA, Russia or China, or any of their allies. Why? Because you are scared to death of their nuclear warheads that would wipe out your country from the map of the world. That is the reason why there was only "cold war" instead of "hot war". MAD was and maybe still is a powrfull doctrine

  • @pierceys234 It's worked. There have been no nuclear attacks because of the fear of return attack.

  • @pierceys234 That's all that it is there for. It's not to kill, but to keep the enemy from attacking, in fear that we'll use it (and we would). If we ever have to use an ICBM, then they have failed their purpose.

  • @pierceys234 Yes, peacekeeper. MAD. Read up on it, my friend.

  • I would love to see when they launch one and it won't start and just falls back on the ground...

  • This ain't go shit on Topol-M

  • @nicf17 don't really matter when a nuke goes off

  • i love how they name weapons of massive destruction with such a names such as peacemaker.. :)

  • @DrKillaser hey....it keeps the Peace :)

  • Pop! Goes the weasel!

  • @ deukhoofd

    Then it should be called fearmaintainer or armaggeddonthreatener or somethin

  • chaaaaaarrrggggge

  • the people who called this thing 'peacekeeper' are fucked in the head.

  • @zimonslot do you think anyone dares to attack you if you have something like this

  • @deukhoofd

    Two points here,

    1. You're absolutely right. This is why we still have nukes.

    2. The MX Peacekeeper has been decomissioned. But we still have Minuteman 3's.

  • Ask Khadaffi this:"Hey Khadaffi can you catch things with your mouth, like M&M's and stuff?" Khadaffi: Ye I do it when Im eating M&M's when there is a commercial break on the tv. Why?" America:"Well, CATCH THIS! *PGOOOOOOOOWWWWW!*" Khadaffi:"NOOOOOOooooo..... *Booom*".

  • 0:15 sounds like me after Mexican food

  • That gives me a hadron

  • Well... Mankind is screwed! :D

  • all that power from metal amazing Nitrates and metal hot ass metal thanks to info from a woman of all things ...60 minutes interview oh well who knows these may get used or maybe never...?

  • The ultimate weapon

  • Its like a GIANT Javelin missile

  • When you consider the principles of "Mutually Assured Destruction" this thing really was a Peacekeeper! These nukes were the most likely reason why the US and the Soviet Union's Cold War never went hot, they were all scared shit to declare war directly on each other for fear of being blown to radioactive bits by each other

    The irony really is that the greatest weapons of war ever created by humanity are the the greatest motive for peace, the only weapons so powerful we're too scared to use.

  • "peacekeeper"... my ass

  • @ticaouette dude if it wernt for nukes the us would be screwed they dont want to invade or luanch nukes back because they know if they luanch its comin right back at them and even then after we launched we would have a high % of being able to knock the nukes out of the sky with thaads and agis and patroits but if they luanch well knock em out of the sky but im not sure if the russians have the stuff to do that

  • Its actually the LGM-118A. That idiot Ronald Reagan called it the peacekeeper, as if killing 10 million people in a city keeps the peace or something.

  • When you see that shit, someone is about to get raped.

  • @manowartrexspacefan they have be retired for years stupid!

  • i just stood my tip of one sat in muesem at colorado springs air force base was kinda spooky cool

  • I'm sure after it's launched it will pull out a white flag and fly above the city.

  • I can do that with my dick

  • Stop bitching about the name. Nuclear weapons are peace keepers. They're the only reason the rest of the world hasn't invaded the US. Hey America, the whole world hates us. These are what's stopping them from killing us.

    Nukes have done more for peace for the US than any peace movement ever has.

  • @HeadbangerFromHell99 Yes, two vast armies equality capable of destroying one another. Just one problem with that plan, it's bullocks somebody will push the button one day.

  • @HeadbangerFromHell99 Yes, two vast armies equality capable of destroying one another. Just one problem with that plan, it's bullocks somebody will push the button one day.

  • @HeadbangerFromHell99

    well they still kill you but unfortunately not in big numbers !

    I hope that will improve soon and that somebody will kill few millions of Americunts in few days...that would be nice :)

  • And about 15 minutes later... this hit the capital of north korea and WW3 began...

  • America....

  • The begining somewhat reminds me of a Javelin

  • @RTSmaster787 dude you would say that...