the end of the world like we know it is beginning, richest people elites gonna hide in underground bunker anti-nuclear, and 99% of us will die like bitch thanks to monetary system and his rich ass familys like Rothschilds detroying our world
At the levels > 30 sievert, death comes in 1-2 days to 100% of untreated people. At 1 Sv, death would come to 1% to 5% of the population in 6-8 weeks. People in the area who refuse to leave have been there a YEAR and have no symptoms. If you were a worker at the plant, you have something to worry about. If you live in Europe, Canada, or the USA you have a better chance of being hit in the head by a falling dead alien than sickness from radiation.
You me, everybody is fukked because the japanese governement are criminals, they should go to prison all of them, the fukushima architects, plantmanagers, anyone who is involved are killing many people, polluting the oceans, destroying our foodbasket, and the whole fukking atmosphere.. People will be affected heavily by this, this is not over yet. Its the big slowly invisable murder we all going to get poisening by this human made tragedy. Tjernobyl, fukushima, all the fuking nukes on this plane
What I really got shocked at after the crisis are:
(1) When radiation & contamination levels rose way over the allowed limits, Japanese government simply increased the levels (numbers) for safety accordingly and told their citizens that things are safe and under control.
(2) Officials & media are be reluctant to reveal the fatal truths, in the name of avoiding creations of unnecessary discomforts in the society.
(3) People simply accept things, and the government has taken no responsibility yet.
Do you really believe some of the things you are saying. Perhaps you should have covered what is really occurring.The crisis is over? Whatever. So how many tons of nuclear fuel do you think was in each reactor? where did it all go? What about the fact that a meltdown does not simply stop. Where are all the facts. I think conjecture is irresponsible when you are talking about an event that has global implications.
@W4rD0g72 They want you to believe it is ok, nothing to see here, keep walking. We as the west have an unprecedented amount of dumbing down and its fucking sickening to say the least.
If they divide all the electricity produced by these 6 molten down plants into the cost of the plant+fuel+electricty previously billed+damage so far+damage for next 100 years+insurance+contamination now and in the next 100 years+ cost of labor so far and 100 years out, they will get the true cost per kilowatt for 130 years. Was it worth it?
The point is that we have to dig other possibilities - but concretely. The last decades nuclear power has been PUSHED by governments and investors who were hoping to take advantage.
They did - but did WE?
What is the prize? The health of the same people who are buying the stuff?
Let me comment this: The so called "physical world" is nothing but an abstract theory - an attempt to understand the real world. People are modifiying it to EARN money. That's not new. In the face of almost a million chernobyl victims we all know Fukushima will be worse.
... and: @ WILL BE - because the damage can't be "measured" exactly and genetic diseases caused by radioactivity can only be monitored in the future. As long as this long-term research is not being accepted as scientific and scientists don't execute it - it will be called "an opinion or a rumor".
But the scientists I see are giving me FRAGMENTS of arguments and interpretations as well. If you are looking for "truth" (whatever it may be) - take a look at the victims. It's not THIS easy.
@gunzcontrol Not so, it was not that long ago ( the 80's and 90's ) actually true that the japs were building more reliable cars but not today, today the American cars are once again the best on the planet and toyota has been ranked as one of the most problem car makers in 2011 with the most defects and the most customer complaints. Thats the fact - be fair and deal with it. Everything changes!
Need a solution for Fukushima nuclear disaster and radioactive waste problem ? - Watch KBVxUd6HdS0 and YYdqakZI99o and aTSoWzOTnWo. - And now ? - That's easy: Send an email to Jap. Gov. members, representatives, media, etc. etc. including the links until sanity and reason get the upper hand over witlessness and ignorance! - But be patiently, it may need a long time as history teaches ...
But the voiceover is talking about cleanup operations around the plant.
This gives a false impression that the nuclear plant caused the shown incredibly destructive flood damage - and that this is what a nuclear disaster looks like, lots of damage.
Local accident? Crisis over? No it ain't over and the radioactive stuff is still spreading all over the world thru winds and sea. They can't even get to the melted fuel. Months already passed and still not much can be done but continuously pumping water. Chernobyl part deux, except much bigger.
There is an immense ammount of astroturfing going on to try and sway support in favor of nuclear power and to convince people japan is safe from radiation.
Stop lying. The cores of at least 2 reactors have buried and workers at Fukushima think that the cooling system ain't doing much since they have observed radiation in the soil outside the complex is increasing. It's a slow Chernobil, like it or not. The problem is if the cores bury enough to reach sea water. That would a disaster never seen by modern humans. And OF COURSE they will not tell the truth. They haven't done so the first weeks & they won't now. They talk about decades, I say centuries
Stop lying. The cores of at least 2 reactors have buried and workers at Fukushima think that the cooling system ain't doing much since they have observed radiation in the soil outside the complex is increasing. It's a slow Chernobil, like it or not. The problem is if the cores bury enough to reach sea water. That would a disaster never seen by modern humans. And OF COURSE they will not tell the truth. They haven't done so the first weeks & they won't now. They talk about decades, I say centuries
Is it just me or is there an entire industry being created to oppose nuclear power, coal-fired stations in the name of green targets to place greater control over our lives. This morning sept 12th reports of blasts at French plant. 2 months ago world-leading nuclear scientist and team wiped-out on suspicious russian plane crash.
Is anyone else wise to these serious events? There's no doubt of billions invested into pseudo-green industries, including our own BBC.
nice report. But: minute 2:10 -ish, this catastrophe Far exceeds Chernobyl and is vastly more than a local or national pollution. At least 600,000 little plutonium pellets were blown up to 2miles away when #3 blew up.Some of that plutonium is dust. There are vast amounts of micron sized particles floating in the sky for 1000's of miles. Stay out of the First rains! I just now (10AM,9/11) I was rained on by a rare Sept rain. The rain drops catch those micron sized particles and drop them on Us.
Some people prefer to base what they say on physical fact rather than picking their beliefs based on whatever sounds most dramatic.
If what you're saying is true, what is the name of the isotope which you think will cause the supposed eternal contamination to that farmland? What is it's half life? What concentration is it present at today?
It's easy to calculate, unless you have some emotional reason not to even bother trying.
Shut your big gob and stop spamming me with inbox posts you little spaz. I have had enough of reading your annoying and ignorant comments. Everyone who thinks I am being mean to him, have a look at his profile and you will find out what I'm talking about. You sir, are a moron.
@BushyBrows301 So you're refusing to give any factual details, or demonstrate any objectivity, or answer any question about the physical reality of the situation, and instead you're just going to have a tantrum and call me bigoted names?
If that was conceived as some sort of rhetorical tactic you've shot yourself in the foot.
It just makes you seem childish and prejudiced, and further serves to highlight the fact that you don't have anything objective or evidence based to say.
@BushyBrows301 Why is it so hard for you to grasp that some people don't just choose the most dramatic rumour they hear, and prefer to have observations of the physical world?
You didn't even attempt to answer any of the factual questions I asked. You have shown, by that, your profound ignorance of the matter on which you preach. And now you're trying to cover it up by trying to distract attention with your childish insults.
Ad hominem attacks simply don't carry the same weight as facts.
Some people prefer to base what they say on physical fact rather than picking their beliefs based on whatever sounds most dramatic.
If what you're saying is true, what is the name of the isotope which you think will cause the supposed eternal contamination to that farmland? What is it's half life? What concentration is it present at today?
It's easy to calculate, unless you have some emotional reason not to even bother trying.
@ImMichaelTaylor ....radioactive cesium, half-life of 30+ years, and all the uranium, plutonium "fuel Fleas" blown around in the wind. Even radioactive silver. Denying is easy, isn't it? It was like the pollution from 200 nuclear bombs going off...
@FeldwebelWolfenstool " Denying is easy, isn't it?" Denying anything without a shred of evidence is easy.
" It was like the pollution from 200 nuclear bombs going off."
What is that claim based on? What level of exposure would that produce? What proportion of exposures at specifica points in and around fukushima is that equivalent to?
Neither you nor the person whose scaremongering rumour you're repeating has quantified that, and people who have aren't scaremongering. Coincidence?
What part do you disagree with and why? I'm sure if you point it out I can give you descriptions of how the fact was established scientifically.
(In answer to your question; asking you for specific details argues I'm a troll; expecting you to accept scientific facts as answer suggests I may just be stupid.)
@BushyBrows301 Are you just claiming that any detectable level of radiation of radionuclides is significantly dangerous? Do you believe that one atom of radioactive material could make you sick? (If so I have bad news).
Unless the potential exposure possible is compared numerically to the observed risks from those levels of exposure, your fear is totally out of proportion. It's your (and the mass media pundits') ignorance which makes you that frightened, not the physical facts.
I just love the way you do not even read what I have said. It amuses me that you can be so dumb, yet so passionate about fighting your cause. You try to sound smart but still fail so epically.
Why do you assume that I think one atom producing radioactivity is going to harm us? That is just plain ridiculous. Why do you say I'm frightened? I am not even near Japan! Do you understand that radiation poisoning takes many years to manifest?
@BushyBrows301 "do not even read what I have said" I did read it. I didn't agree.
"Do you understand that radiation poisoning takes many years to manifest?"
That isn't true.
Radiation poisoning manifests symptoms within minutes if the dose is high enough (many times lethal) and can take up to a few months if the dose is low (just above the threshold of detectable damage.)
Under no circumstances yet observed does it take years (for the accepted medical definition of radiation poisoning).
@BushyBrows301 Cancer takes years to manifest. Maybe that's what you're thinking of.
"You try to sound smart but still fail so epically."
How smart a person may sound is irrelevant. How smart they genuinely are is irrelevant. Whether it fulfils a scientifically illiterate 13 year old's mass media founded idea of what is smart is irrelevant.
The measure of accuracy is agreement with observations of the physical universe. Which you'd know if you had half the sense you pretend to.
There are two reasons people believe things. One is a factual basis, the other is an emotional basis.
I discounted the factual basis as a possibility since no facts were evident, and I recognised some of your narratives and rhetoric as the gross exaggerations and over simplifications prevalent in the lowest common denominator portions of the media.
@BushyBrows301 Since it is possible I have misconstrued or mistaken your position, and since you have said you have a degree in a relevant field, please outline how dangerous the situation is (in a quantitative or at least objective manner), and how many you expect to be killed and made ill by the exposures received.
Please say how you determined the exposures, what sources you based the determination on, and what model of the health effects you used.
Totally downplayed, as instructed by the authorities I'm sure. Sickening isn't it? The people responsible should be strongly held accountable. I can't believe it has come to this.
@SlidewaysPG "Totally downplayed" By who? The mass media who were speculating cases of radiation poisoning right left and centre?
The fact is radiation hasn't killed anyone and probably won't. Compare that to the exploding oil refinery or the thousands drowned. That's what's being downplayed.
To what? Dramatised, attention-seeking speculations from people who don't understand the physics involved, haven't looked at the data, and have virtually no capacity for objective thought?
Your estimate of the fukushima accident's severity is based on your emotional prejudices, not on the evidence.
You are entitled to your own opinion. You are NOT entitled to your own FACTS.
You crazy man! Read what you are saying please, then try to tell me you don't seem like a moron. MANY people have died by radiation all over the world. Many more people are to come. What do you think the nuclear bomb did to the Japanese people? Yeah it blew lots up immediately, but the most damage came from the nuclear fallout.
@BushyBrows301 "MANY people have died by radiation all over the world"
How many of those were from chernobyl radiation and how many from fukushima radiation? How did you work it out? What is the source of observations that you based it on?
@BushyBrows301 I understand that you're scared, and that you don't really understand most of the scientific side of it, but that's no reason to make shit up.
If you bothered to learn about radiation measurement and the health risks of various levels of exposure you'd quickly see that many of the mass media claims and internet rumours are gross exaggerations or outright lies.
Unless you prefer only speaking on subjects you're ignorant of?
I am not ignorant in this subject. I researched this information for 3 years at university... The way you speak is just silly, you get angry when someone else has an opinion but it is clear you don't know much about this topic. Still in Japan there are people dying from mutations caused by the nuclear bombs fallout. Internet rumours?! what are you talking about? I read journals only for my information. They are all peer reviewed and are very reliable information.
@BushyBrows301 You're dealing with either a brainwashed twit, an astroturf shill, or both. He's a waste of time. This fucker was saying it was nothing like Chernobyl day one. He refuses to acknowledge that internal emitters take more time to kill people than ARS. He's a write off. Ignore him.
@BushyBrows301 "nuclear bomb ... most damage came from the nuclear fallout"
Nuclear bombs aren't the same thing as nuclear power stations.
You speak as though you know the radiation levels the bomb produced and what the effects were and have compared them to the radiation level around fukushima. Have you done that, or are you just making it up?
What is the radiation level around fukushima, and what has happened to people who were exposed to that level in the past?
@ImMichaelTaylor I am not sure where you live but none of the US or Canadian news has anything on Fuku. This is the biggest coverup I've seen in a long time. Ever since the radiation hit the West coast the Canadian detectors were shut off... the people have a right to know. Some people, like yourself, think this won't affect us because we are an ocean away. Do some research and think again. I wish you were right, but you are not I'm afraid.
@ImMichaelTaylor I dont know where you get your 'facts' from, but you may need to do more research before you make such claims. There has already been a death from leukemia in the workers at the site, not that it matters, radiological effects can take years to manifest. I used to think too that nuclear tech was safe, but the human element that it has to include is not.
At chernobyl, nearly everyone who slept in pripyat, un-warned of the danger, had their health ruined or suffered long term effects.
Every single person involved in the first few weeks of the cleanup was exposed to more radiation than a fukushima worker is allowed in a lifetime. The reactor was a pit with burning fuel at the bottom. The plant workers could literally TASTE the nuclear fuel in the fucking air. So it's not the same thing at all.
At chernobyl, nearly everyone who slept in pripyat, un-warned of the danger, had their health ruined or suffered long term effects.
Every single person involved in the first few weeks of the cleanup was exposed to more radiation than a fukushima worker is allowed in a lifetime. The reactor was a pit with burning fuel at the bottom. The plant workers could literally TASTE the nuclear fuel in the fucking air. So it's not the same thing at all.
The Nuclear War happened six months ago WAKE UP, Fukushima Daiichi =nuclear war in a can well 4cans, 168 times Hiroshima cesium 137 and still going plus all the outher over 200 different radionuclides released = 10 TO 30 times chernobyl just like TMI, WTF Japan is finished because it is geographically small, the USA has raised the max level of Acceptable radation Exposure in food BY X 1000 TOTAL MEDIA BLACKOUT stay out of the rain watch out for hair loss
This video is a joke, a hoax of TEPCO and the Govt of Japan and the USA. They all are the ugly masterminds of a massive world-wide cover-up. The facts are that this man-made nuclear accident/ disaster is the worst EVER- not 25 years!- , far surpassing Chernobyl...not to mention the oceanic radiation pollution cover-up... anybody else get the picture? Come on, let's all WAKE UP!
At fukushima fuel melted because the decay heat couldn't be cooled well enough. The core was not undergoing fission when coolant failed. The containment is cracked, and radioactive vapour, water and flammable hydrogen can get out.
At chernobyl fuel exploded because the core power jumped to very many times higher than normal. The 2000 tonne lid of the reactor was thrown into the air and the fuel caught fire and could not be put out.
At fukushima fuel melted because the decay heat couldn't be cooled well enough. The core was not undergoing fission when coolant failed. The containment is cracked, and radioactive vapour, water and flammable hydrogen can get out.
At chernobyl fuel exploded because the core power jumped to very many times higher than normal. The 2000 tonne lid of the reactor was thrown into the air and the fuel caught fire and could not be put out.
At fukushima, a few workers have had their cancer risk raised from the normal level of 45% to 45.5% or in one or two cases 46-47%. Crops have been wasted and some farm land may be suspect. There is no evidence whatsoever that people outside the plant have been exposed severely enough to have detectable increase in risk.
At chernobyl, many of the first responders were lethally irradiated within minutes.
@ImMichaelTaylor It is hopeless to try to contain the hysteria of morons. People like BushyBrows will respond with non-sequiturs that barely make any sense.
@MvRMax24712 Or advance in nuclear technology to make it safer. It is possible, and unfortunately its not being done. Most of this blame can be put on the NRC. It isnt nuclear power thats wrong, its the people who are in charge of it.
@eastcoaster54 Actually, our ecosystem is the last thing to worry about. We do need electricity and fuel, simply because of the shape of the economy. There is no other power source that would be worth the cost of putting in Nuclear Powers place.
BENJAMIN FULFORD VALENTINE'S DAY 2012 UPDATE PART 1
watch?v=0pCpA7RccYc&feature=related
Ganseblumchen12 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the end of the world like we know it is beginning, richest people elites gonna hide in underground bunker anti-nuclear, and 99% of us will die like bitch thanks to monetary system and his rich ass familys like Rothschilds detroying our world
motarido 2 weeks ago
At the levels > 30 sievert, death comes in 1-2 days to 100% of untreated people. At 1 Sv, death would come to 1% to 5% of the population in 6-8 weeks. People in the area who refuse to leave have been there a YEAR and have no symptoms. If you were a worker at the plant, you have something to worry about. If you live in Europe, Canada, or the USA you have a better chance of being hit in the head by a falling dead alien than sickness from radiation.
TheJasperkitty 3 weeks ago
I m sure the Media is hiding some information about fukushima how bad it is
sampleforyou 3 weeks ago
@sampleforyou It looks very much like it. Even now, the problem is not solved: guardian.co.uk/world/2012/feb/12/fukushima-reactor-reheating-concern
When the temperature's too high and officials say "nah we like to think the thermometer's broken", you know something's fishy.
theShice 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
sampleforyou 3 weeks ago
@sampleforyou lol you need to relax and enjoy life!
Fox250R 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
sampleforyou 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
sampleforyou 3 weeks ago
You me, everybody is fukked because the japanese governement are criminals, they should go to prison all of them, the fukushima architects, plantmanagers, anyone who is involved are killing many people, polluting the oceans, destroying our foodbasket, and the whole fukking atmosphere.. People will be affected heavily by this, this is not over yet. Its the big slowly invisable murder we all going to get poisening by this human made tragedy. Tjernobyl, fukushima, all the fuking nukes on this plane
sampleforyou 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This pisses me off. One nation screwing the whole world. Japs are the cancer of the earth. They are going to kill us all with their radiation.
mechichi666 4 weeks ago
''A LOCAL disaster affecting all of Japan''......?
I think you will find its a little more wide spread than that, try the entire northern hemisphere, just give it time.
OpenPYourLMindZ 1 month ago 2
@OpenPYourLMindZ
yes. Canada for example.
BlueBackup 1 week ago
What I really got shocked at after the crisis are:
(1) When radiation & contamination levels rose way over the allowed limits, Japanese government simply increased the levels (numbers) for safety accordingly and told their citizens that things are safe and under control.
(2) Officials & media are be reluctant to reveal the fatal truths, in the name of avoiding creations of unnecessary discomforts in the society.
(3) People simply accept things, and the government has taken no responsibility yet.
youngk9lover 1 month ago
What do you expect? Fukushima nuclear meltdown is right next to Chernobyl...
chococta96 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WORLD RECORD: BIGGEST WIND TURBINE
windturbinecarriedbywheels.weebly.com
ZERO-NOISE from the gears and the generators because they are silenced underground (Only the outer parts of the turbines may create sound.).
This SAVES THE BIRDS AND BATS (since slow-moving) and helps the wind energy companies (since it is FREE FOR ALL.).
TheServiceWeb 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is one very "clammy" video. =p
octaviocurti922 1 month ago
This vid went viral on Manila
ughkane614h 1 month ago
Do you really believe some of the things you are saying. Perhaps you should have covered what is really occurring.The crisis is over? Whatever. So how many tons of nuclear fuel do you think was in each reactor? where did it all go? What about the fact that a meltdown does not simply stop. Where are all the facts. I think conjecture is irresponsible when you are talking about an event that has global implications.
W4rD0g72 2 months ago
@W4rD0g72 They want you to believe it is ok, nothing to see here, keep walking. We as the west have an unprecedented amount of dumbing down and its fucking sickening to say the least.
SlayerofFiction 1 month ago
Lying, distorting truth and manipulative exaggerating are so typical of Brits, what a fag nation.
gunzcontrol 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If they divide all the electricity produced by these 6 molten down plants into the cost of the plant+fuel+electricty previously billed+damage so far+damage for next 100 years+insurance+contamination now and in the next 100 years+ cost of labor so far and 100 years out, they will get the true cost per kilowatt for 130 years. Was it worth it?
altgeldrarities 2 months ago
@Zoza15
The point is that we have to dig other possibilities - but concretely. The last decades nuclear power has been PUSHED by governments and investors who were hoping to take advantage.
They did - but did WE?
What is the prize? The health of the same people who are buying the stuff?
BiasedScientists 3 months ago
@BiasedScientists Money, your health means absolutely nothing to governments.
SlayerofFiction 1 month ago
@ImMichaelTaylor
Let me comment this: The so called "physical world" is nothing but an abstract theory - an attempt to understand the real world. People are modifiying it to EARN money. That's not new. In the face of almost a million chernobyl victims we all know Fukushima will be worse.
BiasedScientists 3 months ago
Comment removed
BiasedScientists 3 months ago
... and: @ WILL BE - because the damage can't be "measured" exactly and genetic diseases caused by radioactivity can only be monitored in the future. As long as this long-term research is not being accepted as scientific and scientists don't execute it - it will be called "an opinion or a rumor".
But the scientists I see are giving me FRAGMENTS of arguments and interpretations as well. If you are looking for "truth" (whatever it may be) - take a look at the victims. It's not THIS easy.
BiasedScientists 3 months ago
@BiasedScientists Excellent post
SlayerofFiction 1 month ago
TEPCO LIES JUST LIKE TOYOTA LIES, THE DIRTY COWARDS LIE WHILE WE DIE, SEND A MESSAGE AND BOYCOTT JAPAN!!!!!!
meattube4u33 3 months ago
@meattube4u33
nawww .... please allow me to add: boycott the liars and help the people.
BiasedScientists 3 months ago
@meattube4u33 Get over it, dude, american cars are crap compared to these of japanese, your car industry belongs to history
gunzcontrol 2 months ago
@gunzcontrol Not so, it was not that long ago ( the 80's and 90's ) actually true that the japs were building more reliable cars but not today, today the American cars are once again the best on the planet and toyota has been ranked as one of the most problem car makers in 2011 with the most defects and the most customer complaints. Thats the fact - be fair and deal with it. Everything changes!
meattube4u33 2 months ago
@meattube4u33 American cars still suck. As an American, I can assure you of that.
GDuff123 2 months ago
@meattube4u33
Who did the ranking?........uhhhh oh yeah you forgot to mention that.
W4rD0g72 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Japan raped 200,000 Asian teenagers during history's largest sex slavery system... Japan was already fucked up 65 years ago.
Gwegqwet 3 months ago
ban nuclear power now!!!!
zebra4593 4 months ago
@zebra4593 Thats Ok, but do you have a sollution to boost up Elektricity to power your Tv. or computer?.
We can all go to substainabe Energy, even though substainable energy is not stable enough for contiues producing.
Even funnier, Nuclear energy is substainable energy if handled carefully..
Zoza15 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
see my blog please!
OCCUPYWALLSTREET2012 DOT BLOGSPOT DOT COM
spell it properly or you will be redirected!
willkill4kronic 4 months ago
nicht nur deutschland, auch die schweiz hat den atomausstieg beschlossen. Bravo!
Vassilika1 4 months ago
@Vassilika1 Beschliessen ist gut, durchführen ist besser.
2010collapse 4 months ago
Need a solution for Fukushima nuclear disaster and radioactive waste problem ? - Watch KBVxUd6HdS0 and YYdqakZI99o and aTSoWzOTnWo. - And now ? - That's easy: Send an email to Jap. Gov. members, representatives, media, etc. etc. including the links until sanity and reason get the upper hand over witlessness and ignorance! - But be patiently, it may need a long time as history teaches ...
helmionyt 4 months ago
2:52 all of this is flood damage.
But the voiceover is talking about cleanup operations around the plant.
This gives a false impression that the nuclear plant caused the shown incredibly destructive flood damage - and that this is what a nuclear disaster looks like, lots of damage.
roidroid 5 months ago 2
tHIS REPORTER IS SUCH A GOOD zionist zoo kok sukker...
```
nOTICE THE WAY HE FLUFFS OVER all the big truths like the fact
```
all the contamianted water is going straight into the Ocean
HoodwinkedbyanAngel 5 months ago
Local accident? Crisis over? No it ain't over and the radioactive stuff is still spreading all over the world thru winds and sea. They can't even get to the melted fuel. Months already passed and still not much can be done but continuously pumping water. Chernobyl part deux, except much bigger.
lexwalker2 5 months ago
I heard TEPCO will stop supplying foods for worker of Fukushima nuclear power plant.
They are DEVIL
hmaturkey 5 months ago
hahahahhaha hiroshima and nagasAKI!
ghoststrider45 5 months ago
@ghoststrider45
are you laughing at this?
guibin 5 months ago
Respect to those still following, refusing to ignore the nuclear dilemma.
I can almost feel the hate already from future generations of humans on Earth.
Drahcir9truthurts 5 months ago
There is an immense ammount of astroturfing going on to try and sway support in favor of nuclear power and to convince people japan is safe from radiation.
Jpower24 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stop lying. The cores of at least 2 reactors have buried and workers at Fukushima think that the cooling system ain't doing much since they have observed radiation in the soil outside the complex is increasing. It's a slow Chernobil, like it or not. The problem is if the cores bury enough to reach sea water. That would a disaster never seen by modern humans. And OF COURSE they will not tell the truth. They haven't done so the first weeks & they won't now. They talk about decades, I say centuries
yowyOw69 5 months ago
Stop lying. The cores of at least 2 reactors have buried and workers at Fukushima think that the cooling system ain't doing much since they have observed radiation in the soil outside the complex is increasing. It's a slow Chernobil, like it or not. The problem is if the cores bury enough to reach sea water. That would a disaster never seen by modern humans. And OF COURSE they will not tell the truth. They haven't done so the first weeks & they won't now. They talk about decades, I say centuries
yowyOw69 5 months ago
Is it just me or is there an entire industry being created to oppose nuclear power, coal-fired stations in the name of green targets to place greater control over our lives. This morning sept 12th reports of blasts at French plant. 2 months ago world-leading nuclear scientist and team wiped-out on suspicious russian plane crash.
Is anyone else wise to these serious events? There's no doubt of billions invested into pseudo-green industries, including our own BBC.
bertyUK 5 months ago
nice report. But: minute 2:10 -ish, this catastrophe Far exceeds Chernobyl and is vastly more than a local or national pollution. At least 600,000 little plutonium pellets were blown up to 2miles away when #3 blew up.Some of that plutonium is dust. There are vast amounts of micron sized particles floating in the sky for 1000's of miles. Stay out of the First rains! I just now (10AM,9/11) I was rained on by a rare Sept rain. The rain drops catch those micron sized particles and drop them on Us.
IExposeMormonism 5 months ago
LOOOLOLOLOL
SirHungryHippo 5 months ago
キリストや反キリスト?
あなたが反キリストに奉仕を希望しない場合は、あなたの魂を交換するためにイエスキリストに呼びかける。
あなたがたは真理で祈るようにすることができます...
主なる神は、私は罪人&Iは、あなたの御子イエスが私の代わりに十字架で死ぬために送られたと信じて知っている。私の罪を許すと私の魂を償還及びあなたの聖霊によって永遠の命へ導いてくれるしてください。私はあなたが私に聖書を理解していただくと悪から私を救うことを頼む
GodisTruthseekTruth 5 months ago
"for decades to come"....try FOREVER, buddy.
FeldwebelWolfenstool 5 months ago
@FeldwebelWolfenstool "try FOREVER, buddy"
Some people prefer to base what they say on physical fact rather than picking their beliefs based on whatever sounds most dramatic.
If what you're saying is true, what is the name of the isotope which you think will cause the supposed eternal contamination to that farmland? What is it's half life? What concentration is it present at today?
It's easy to calculate, unless you have some emotional reason not to even bother trying.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor
Shut your big gob and stop spamming me with inbox posts you little spaz. I have had enough of reading your annoying and ignorant comments. Everyone who thinks I am being mean to him, have a look at his profile and you will find out what I'm talking about. You sir, are a moron.
BushyBrows301 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 If you don't want people to call you on your ignorance don't flaunt it in public.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 So you're refusing to give any factual details, or demonstrate any objectivity, or answer any question about the physical reality of the situation, and instead you're just going to have a tantrum and call me bigoted names?
If that was conceived as some sort of rhetorical tactic you've shot yourself in the foot.
It just makes you seem childish and prejudiced, and further serves to highlight the fact that you don't have anything objective or evidence based to say.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 Why is it so hard for you to grasp that some people don't just choose the most dramatic rumour they hear, and prefer to have observations of the physical world?
You didn't even attempt to answer any of the factual questions I asked. You have shown, by that, your profound ignorance of the matter on which you preach. And now you're trying to cover it up by trying to distract attention with your childish insults.
Ad hominem attacks simply don't carry the same weight as facts.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@FeldwebelWolfenstool "try FOREVER, buddy"
Some people prefer to base what they say on physical fact rather than picking their beliefs based on whatever sounds most dramatic.
If what you're saying is true, what is the name of the isotope which you think will cause the supposed eternal contamination to that farmland? What is it's half life? What concentration is it present at today?
It's easy to calculate, unless you have some emotional reason not to even bother trying.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor ....radioactive cesium, half-life of 30+ years, and all the uranium, plutonium "fuel Fleas" blown around in the wind. Even radioactive silver. Denying is easy, isn't it? It was like the pollution from 200 nuclear bombs going off...
FeldwebelWolfenstool 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FeldwebelWolfenstool " Denying is easy, isn't it?" Denying anything without a shred of evidence is easy.
" It was like the pollution from 200 nuclear bombs going off."
What is that claim based on? What level of exposure would that produce? What proportion of exposures at specifica points in and around fukushima is that equivalent to?
Neither you nor the person whose scaremongering rumour you're repeating has quantified that, and people who have aren't scaremongering. Coincidence?
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor
Not sure if Troll or just REALLY STUPID
BushyBrows301 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 "Not sure if"
What part do you disagree with and why? I'm sure if you point it out I can give you descriptions of how the fact was established scientifically.
(In answer to your question; asking you for specific details argues I'm a troll; expecting you to accept scientific facts as answer suggests I may just be stupid.)
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
Comment removed
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 Are you just claiming that any detectable level of radiation of radionuclides is significantly dangerous? Do you believe that one atom of radioactive material could make you sick? (If so I have bad news).
Unless the potential exposure possible is compared numerically to the observed risks from those levels of exposure, your fear is totally out of proportion. It's your (and the mass media pundits') ignorance which makes you that frightened, not the physical facts.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor
I just love the way you do not even read what I have said. It amuses me that you can be so dumb, yet so passionate about fighting your cause. You try to sound smart but still fail so epically.
Why do you assume that I think one atom producing radioactivity is going to harm us? That is just plain ridiculous. Why do you say I'm frightened? I am not even near Japan! Do you understand that radiation poisoning takes many years to manifest?
BushyBrows301 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 "do not even read what I have said" I did read it. I didn't agree.
"Do you understand that radiation poisoning takes many years to manifest?"
That isn't true.
Radiation poisoning manifests symptoms within minutes if the dose is high enough (many times lethal) and can take up to a few months if the dose is low (just above the threshold of detectable damage.)
Under no circumstances yet observed does it take years (for the accepted medical definition of radiation poisoning).
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 Cancer takes years to manifest. Maybe that's what you're thinking of.
"You try to sound smart but still fail so epically."
How smart a person may sound is irrelevant. How smart they genuinely are is irrelevant. Whether it fulfils a scientifically illiterate 13 year old's mass media founded idea of what is smart is irrelevant.
The measure of accuracy is agreement with observations of the physical universe. Which you'd know if you had half the sense you pretend to.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 "Why do you say I'm frightened?"
There are two reasons people believe things. One is a factual basis, the other is an emotional basis.
I discounted the factual basis as a possibility since no facts were evident, and I recognised some of your narratives and rhetoric as the gross exaggerations and over simplifications prevalent in the lowest common denominator portions of the media.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 Since it is possible I have misconstrued or mistaken your position, and since you have said you have a degree in a relevant field, please outline how dangerous the situation is (in a quantitative or at least objective manner), and how many you expect to be killed and made ill by the exposures received.
Please say how you determined the exposures, what sources you based the determination on, and what model of the health effects you used.
Or admit that you speak out of ignorance.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
Totally downplayed, as instructed by the authorities I'm sure. Sickening isn't it? The people responsible should be strongly held accountable. I can't believe it has come to this.
SlidewaysPG 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SlidewaysPG "Totally downplayed" By who? The mass media who were speculating cases of radiation poisoning right left and centre?
The fact is radiation hasn't killed anyone and probably won't. Compare that to the exploding oil refinery or the thousands drowned. That's what's being downplayed.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor Are you serious? Open your eyes man.
SlidewaysPG 5 months ago
@SlidewaysPG "Are you serious?" Completely.
"Open your eyes"
To what? Dramatised, attention-seeking speculations from people who don't understand the physics involved, haven't looked at the data, and have virtually no capacity for objective thought?
Your estimate of the fukushima accident's severity is based on your emotional prejudices, not on the evidence.
You are entitled to your own opinion. You are NOT entitled to your own FACTS.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor
You crazy man! Read what you are saying please, then try to tell me you don't seem like a moron. MANY people have died by radiation all over the world. Many more people are to come. What do you think the nuclear bomb did to the Japanese people? Yeah it blew lots up immediately, but the most damage came from the nuclear fallout.
BushyBrows301 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BushyBrows301 "MANY people have died by radiation all over the world"
How many of those were from chernobyl radiation and how many from fukushima radiation? How did you work it out? What is the source of observations that you based it on?
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago 2
@BushyBrows301 I understand that you're scared, and that you don't really understand most of the scientific side of it, but that's no reason to make shit up.
If you bothered to learn about radiation measurement and the health risks of various levels of exposure you'd quickly see that many of the mass media claims and internet rumours are gross exaggerations or outright lies.
Unless you prefer only speaking on subjects you're ignorant of?
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor
I am not ignorant in this subject. I researched this information for 3 years at university... The way you speak is just silly, you get angry when someone else has an opinion but it is clear you don't know much about this topic. Still in Japan there are people dying from mutations caused by the nuclear bombs fallout. Internet rumours?! what are you talking about? I read journals only for my information. They are all peer reviewed and are very reliable information.
BushyBrows301 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 You're dealing with either a brainwashed twit, an astroturf shill, or both. He's a waste of time. This fucker was saying it was nothing like Chernobyl day one. He refuses to acknowledge that internal emitters take more time to kill people than ARS. He's a write off. Ignore him.
HyperIndividualist 5 months ago
@BushyBrows301 "nuclear bomb ... most damage came from the nuclear fallout"
Nuclear bombs aren't the same thing as nuclear power stations.
You speak as though you know the radiation levels the bomb produced and what the effects were and have compared them to the radiation level around fukushima. Have you done that, or are you just making it up?
What is the radiation level around fukushima, and what has happened to people who were exposed to that level in the past?
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor I am not sure where you live but none of the US or Canadian news has anything on Fuku. This is the biggest coverup I've seen in a long time. Ever since the radiation hit the West coast the Canadian detectors were shut off... the people have a right to know. Some people, like yourself, think this won't affect us because we are an ocean away. Do some research and think again. I wish you were right, but you are not I'm afraid.
SlidewaysPG 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor I dont know where you get your 'facts' from, but you may need to do more research before you make such claims. There has already been a death from leukemia in the workers at the site, not that it matters, radiological effects can take years to manifest. I used to think too that nuclear tech was safe, but the human element that it has to include is not.
Shofoxy 5 months ago
@SlidewaysPG @2010Mikah "far surpassing Chernobyl"
At chernobyl, nearly everyone who slept in pripyat, un-warned of the danger, had their health ruined or suffered long term effects.
Every single person involved in the first few weeks of the cleanup was exposed to more radiation than a fukushima worker is allowed in a lifetime. The reactor was a pit with burning fuel at the bottom. The plant workers could literally TASTE the nuclear fuel in the fucking air. So it's not the same thing at all.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SlidewaysPG @2010Mikah "far surpassing Chernobyl"
At chernobyl, nearly everyone who slept in pripyat, un-warned of the danger, had their health ruined or suffered long term effects.
Every single person involved in the first few weeks of the cleanup was exposed to more radiation than a fukushima worker is allowed in a lifetime. The reactor was a pit with burning fuel at the bottom. The plant workers could literally TASTE the nuclear fuel in the fucking air. So it's not the same thing at all.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
lol at the conspiracy ppl. what a horrible way to have to live.
jeebersjumpincryst 5 months ago 5
@jeebersjumpincryst It's just an annoying by-product of evolution, just ignore it.
FreeGluon 5 months ago
@jeebersjumpincryst There is no conspiracy and never have been any. This phrase ''but don't tell this to X'' doesn't even exist.
albert6014 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Nuclear War happened six months ago WAKE UP, Fukushima Daiichi =nuclear war in a can well 4cans, 168 times Hiroshima cesium 137 and still going plus all the outher over 200 different radionuclides released = 10 TO 30 times chernobyl just like TMI, WTF Japan is finished because it is geographically small, the USA has raised the max level of Acceptable radation Exposure in food BY X 1000 TOTAL MEDIA BLACKOUT stay out of the rain watch out for hair loss
gck82s 5 months ago
Nice down play of how horrible this disaster really is guys. Great job.
getincarihavecandy 5 months ago
@getincarihavecandy
Explain, please.
pbmdh 5 months ago
This video is a joke, a hoax of TEPCO and the Govt of Japan and the USA. They all are the ugly masterminds of a massive world-wide cover-up. The facts are that this man-made nuclear accident/ disaster is the worst EVER- not 25 years!- , far surpassing Chernobyl...not to mention the oceanic radiation pollution cover-up... anybody else get the picture? Come on, let's all WAKE UP!
2010Mikah 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@2010Mikah Do you also believe the world will end in 2012? LOL you're a joke.
zaSpeaker 5 months ago
@2010Mikah lol u are a joke
jeebersjumpincryst 5 months ago
@2010Mikah "far surpassing Chernobyl"
What aspect are you comparing to come to that conclusion?
Not people killed or harmed certainly. I feel sure you must be almost completely ignorant of the chernobyl accident to say such a thing.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@2010Mikah "far surpassing Chernobyl"
At fukushima fuel melted because the decay heat couldn't be cooled well enough. The core was not undergoing fission when coolant failed. The containment is cracked, and radioactive vapour, water and flammable hydrogen can get out.
At chernobyl fuel exploded because the core power jumped to very many times higher than normal. The 2000 tonne lid of the reactor was thrown into the air and the fuel caught fire and could not be put out.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@2010Mikah "far surpassing Chernobyl"
At fukushima fuel melted because the decay heat couldn't be cooled well enough. The core was not undergoing fission when coolant failed. The containment is cracked, and radioactive vapour, water and flammable hydrogen can get out.
At chernobyl fuel exploded because the core power jumped to very many times higher than normal. The 2000 tonne lid of the reactor was thrown into the air and the fuel caught fire and could not be put out.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@2010Mikah "far surpassing Chernobyl"
At fukushima, a few workers have had their cancer risk raised from the normal level of 45% to 45.5% or in one or two cases 46-47%. Crops have been wasted and some farm land may be suspect. There is no evidence whatsoever that people outside the plant have been exposed severely enough to have detectable increase in risk.
At chernobyl, many of the first responders were lethally irradiated within minutes.
ImMichaelTaylor 5 months ago
@ImMichaelTaylor It is hopeless to try to contain the hysteria of morons. People like BushyBrows will respond with non-sequiturs that barely make any sense.
dsbnh 5 months ago
this is why governments need to stop procrastinating and switch to renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, hydroelectric and bio fuels.
MvRMax24712 5 months ago
@MvRMax24712 Or advance in nuclear technology to make it safer. It is possible, and unfortunately its not being done. Most of this blame can be put on the NRC. It isnt nuclear power thats wrong, its the people who are in charge of it.
FlashProduktions 5 months ago 4
@FlashProduktions I tend to disagree. Perhaps for space exploration nuclear power would be good
BUT we neeeeed to protect our ecosyatem mor ethen we need electricity or fuel
HOWEVER the proof is in the pudding
IF it CAN be safe. Like long term, dealing with nuclear waste included, and proof can be shown, perhaps I xcould be persuaded.
Personally i think its time for people to get an NEW power resource tech and implement it economically on a global scale STABLY
eastcoaster54 4 months ago
@eastcoaster54 Actually, our ecosystem is the last thing to worry about. We do need electricity and fuel, simply because of the shape of the economy. There is no other power source that would be worth the cost of putting in Nuclear Powers place.
FlashProduktions 4 months ago
@FlashProduktions
we can't even handle the waste.
BiasedScientists 3 months ago
@khanbaliq No they are not they are just stating the facts without hyperboly.
reafdaw01 5 months ago 2
TOP SECRET information of Fukushima: watch?v=nZClFH3qmn0
R0bb1nH00d5 5 months ago
March 11th seems to be a bay date. Bombings in Spain, Earthquake in Japan.
omiolo 5 months ago
Well made and unbiased report.
mace1337 5 months ago