Added: 2 years ago
From: bigthink
Views: 1,298
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i love that woman's voice!

  • stop you blabbing and nonsense.

    you cost the democrats many seats in 2010 for mimicking the drudge report and criticizing the Obama administration simply to get some action on your website.

    then you talk about freedom of expression that you suppress on you own website, so go to hell hypocrite .

  • Apparently this verbose cow missed "the sign" that she, and the rest of the nutty left-wing fringe, is completely out of touch with the American people.

  • too bad only 300 people viewed this!

    It's nice if she really cares Arianna Huffington, about the "warning signs", about informing people really about what's important. Not what's important to Wall Street, or what's important to the elites (omg, someone wants to form a union!) but what's important to the bottom 90%.

    However ladies & gentlemen, in this day of propaganda and mainstream media, DONT TRUST ANY NEWS SOURCE. Arianna Huffington must EARN our trust, just like anyone else.

  • 1:00

    Ten MILLION people being moved from middle class to below the poverty level.

    It doesn't matter whether or not you like Huffington, you'd have to be a fool to think that's not important.

  • Arianna Huffington is a joke. Her website is a joke. The level of censorship on her website is surreal. It makes members of her site think that is what everyone is thinking when in reality she is censoring any opposing views. Here's to freedom of speech Arianna.

  • what has huffington ever done that makes her qualified to talk about anything? seriously? marrying a senator makes you an expert at sociological trends how?

  • Do you have any intelligent comment to make about the MERITS of the policy arguments she is making? Or ALL YOU CAN COME UP WITH IS A PERSONAL ATTACK?

    Republicans = NO IDEAS. NO PROBLEM-SOLVING. JUST RHETORIC.

  • she really didnt make any real conclusions. lol. she basically said based on her personal observations, this that and the other. there was no controls, no studies, nothing backing up her opinion. she made claims, now she has to back them up. until she does, her opinion is as valid as an chimpanzees.

  • Her policy views are clear in this video. If you dont understand what she is saying, go to college.

    Check out the Huffington Post for DETAILED POLICY ANALYSIS, including studies, to BACK UP HER CLAIMS.

    Or ask a chimpanzee what HE thinks, as per your normal process.

  • in academics, people cite studies, show proof. use scientific method to make their points. you and arianna have done neither. now it is you how aren't talking policy but making personal attacks. on her site their is not one academic study that backs up her claims. policy is not science. you apparently like the monkey logic, you listen to an unqualified chimp, huffington.

  • keep soaking in the propaganda. sociobiologists are shredding these theories to death. read some pinker and dawkins. they enjoy making mincemeat of these kinds of illogical utopian visions.

  • "On her site, there is not one academic study that backs up her claims..."

    THAT IS SIMPLY A LIE.

    Republicans lie. And freaks like you repeat the lies. And Sarah Palin becomes a public figure, that retards think has something REAL to say about public policy, because she repeats the lies again.

  • i'm not a republican. lol. there isn't one academic source available. a government study is hardly academic. one independant source would be nice. and maybe one model where this policy has ever worked would be nice too. not there either. but keep making personal attacks after you claim you want ot talk about policy. i am talking about sourcing and you are making personal attacks. lol. you nuts are so easy to turn into hypocrites.

  • THE SOURCES ARE THERE, and the historical models. Why do you keep lying? Is it a Terret's thing?

  • the sources are government sources. the historical models are invalid. you have to model american society.

  • Oh. So you dont AGREE WITH HER SOURCES.

    I probably wouldnt agree with yours: Hannity, Limbaugh, Drudge, OReilly, Beck, David Horowitz, Bill Crystal, The Heritage Foundation, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove...DID I LEAVE ANY OF YOUR FAVORITES OUT?

  • what a moron. you folks from the left pole seem to think anything diverting from your ideas must be cheney like. you are such a windbag. go watch my videos, i am hardly republican. i spent 3 years on youtube bashing bush. you idiots think because someone doesnt like apples they have to like oranges. i don't like any of those people. i just don't believe in silly right-left paradigms that make your life easy.

  • Let me guess. Ron Paul?

  • have you even bothered looking at my 200 plus videos to find out or do you always, like arianna, make assupmtions based on no proof at all? no wonder you love her so much, you both do the same things, jump to illogical conclusions. speaking of going to college, did you take critical thinking because your leaping to conclusions skills are amazing. lol. ron paul is a paranoid moron.

  • btw moron boy, do you always bash folks for making sane comments about her qulifications to speak on such matters or does your doctor have a GED and thats it? she is no expert on these matters. you claim you want to talk policy then all you do is make up shit about me. this argument is not about me, its about her qualification to speak on such matters (she has none) and whether her sources are valid, which sociobiologists have shown, its marxist oppoycock.

  • Do you actually think I am going to take time out of my day to do research ON YOU and your 400 videos, to find out what YOU are all about? WHAT AN EGO, DUDE!!

    You bash Progressives. Be ready to take the heat for what you say.

    I dont give a flying fuck how many videos you have. If you think you have some ideas -- write them down, right here, right now, and I'll read them and tell you what I think.

    Otherwise fuck off.

  • no apparently you are goni to make ad hom attacks and assuptions about people you dont even know. like most liberals, anyone who disagrees with you must be a fascist. its as silly as bush thinking anyone who doesnt agree with him is not a patriot. same cloth you are cut from.  you are a bigoted moron.

  • YOU come on here and make ad hominem attack against Huffington, a brilliant woman, who has a very popular and successful site, that provides space to hundreds of other thoughtful writers and problem solvers to debate issues.

    SO I CALL YOU ON IT.

    Then you retreat into "I'm not a Republican!" "Watch my videos if you want to know what I believe!"

    IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY--SAY IT!!

    Right here. Right now.

    Or shut the fuck up.

  • THats not an ad hom. I stated a fact. Huffington doesnt have the educational or professional merits to speak of such issues. that said, you claim you want to talk issues, then you do exactly what you rail against. that is called hypocrisy, the progessive left in america is full of that. i didnt retreat into anything, you made an accusation, i was simply refuting it, eith facts and proof. unlike what you and arianna have.

    the burden of proof is on arriana she made the claims.

  • So, should we tax the rich to pay for universal health care?

  • why not, we tax them now for medicare and medicaid. whats the difference? but the plan includes taxing small business the same as large corporations. it also will force folks that are uneployed to pay for their own healthcare. that said, its looks like its a dying policy.

  • Forcing people that are unemployed to pay for healthcare is one of the problems we have right now. If you have a family, loosing your job or changing your job puts your family at risk.

    It gives the employers unfair leverage over their employees.

  • Well, with Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy, and the loopholes that allow them to shelter money by having fake headquarters in the Caymon Islands, we actually dont tax corporations nearly enough.

    The plan actually doesnt tax small businesses the same as large corporations -- in fact it provides all kinds of help for small businesses.

    Your assertion that unemployed will have to pay for their health care is utterly false.

    Please provide citations for your assertions. Fox Snooze by any chance?

  • No, we should tax drugs and junk food.

    That way the people that are slowly killing themselves and passing the bill along to the public are actually paying their own medical bills.

    And if they can no longer afford the crap that's killing them then they won't be such a "toxic asset" for the public~

  • All ideas should be considered. And then, based on EVIDENCE, RESEARCH, FACTS, AND DATA, we should go forward.

    And that is EXACTLY what the Obama administration is doing.

  • @taoofmichael Here we are one year later, and you were completely WRONG. Lying Obama has done no "research," and is flushing this country right down the toilet. At least I don't have to live with the shame of having voted for this incompetent fool.

  • there are no merits to her agrument. he models are invalid, her sources are not academic. its simple politics. no different than faith based religion.

  • She has a MA in economics, that might qualify her to comment on the current status of the US economy. She was also raised by a journalist. So just maybe she is qualified to comment on the current economic status of the USA.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more