Black holes are often portrayed as some mythical beasts that eat stars and planets. It's time people realize that black holes are just the same old matter, but gathered into one spot.
I've always seen black holes as sink drains...once theres no more water...the "black hole" dies. Yet, water still sits in the tub...same for space. I don't see a black hole growing past the critical point. Once it has all the matter it's gravity can get...it's done for. I'd be more worried about black holes disappearing...not getting larger. Take away the spin, take away the life.
well, stjester's the only one to address me. but further on SMBH's, this was taken from wikipedia "Eventually, as a result of gravitational relaxation, all stars will either fall into central supermassive black holes or be flung into intergalactic space as a result of collisions." look up galaxy. So with this statement, and proof that black holes can eventually absorb enough matter to become an SMBH (no star is large enough to create one from the start), this vid is either old, or a fake.
Hey Stupids Humans. well it's 70% of all but 10% aren't, 20% are like"I don't know or don't care". I mean it's all Theory like everything else on what humans believe.
You can't tell Whats what here or there. You need real Proof not pictures or Graphics and lies. It takes lots of studying, A LOT OF TIME to see what this or that is. In Truth, Humans aren't the most intelligent creatures.
Beliefs can't tell it. But you can with your studies.
Don't Believe what People SAY or Think. Choose Wisely.
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
their's something your theory hasn't gone over, w/ good reason, because it would be evidence enough to prove it wrong. a bh gravitational pull absorbs light itself. something stars definitly don't do. and just how strong is a bh gravity? well last time I checked, every circular galaxy (like ours) has a supermassive bh towards the center of it. a bh's gravity would be higher than the star it came from since it would have roughly the same amount of matter, but an extremely higher density.
let me add to this stupid video full of lies that theres plenty of evidence that on the center of globular clusters THERES A BLACKHOLE, a black hole that was once a star who not only ate/moved/attract his stupid solar system but ALL THE STARS ON HIs NEIGHBORHOOD, kk? thanks!
2 stars 1 of them became a blackhole and start sucking material from the other star even if their orbiting and millions of miles away that means this doc is wrong bout puting a black hole in center of our solar system
@stjester No, you're wrong in thinking that matter is stripped from all stars in the gravity of a black hole. In fact, we are in the gravitational field of every black hole in existence right now. Gravitational fields go on forever.
The doc's point was that as long as the mass is the same, there is no difference
@tommyk77 matter can be stripped from a star if the star is close enough to do so, theres plenty of hubble photos and videos that shows this. Let me put it this way if theres a super gigantic star on another solar system , that sun goes supernova/blackhole THE BLACKHOLE will eat the solar system plain an simple on time X.
@stjester Yes, but my point was that the distance has to be small enough for stars to have matter stripped. Our closest star (second closest, technically) is far too far away for our sun (as a black hole) to strip it of its matter
Black Holes are an abstract mathematical figment of physics arrived at by dividing by 0, theorised like dark matter/energy to account for a failed gravitational only model of the universe, when gravity was found to be insuficient to hold galaxies together with thier angular momentum as it is. When the original BH theories didnt fit accretion discs were made up. It is clearly an electrical phenomenon & a plasma universe needs no undetectable imaginary stuff to account for all we observe
Awesome video. I've always been fascinated by black holes. I already knew about the x-rays. Interesting still....first time I've ever heard of the outflows....... ^.-
"keep funding us" is what it seems to be saying....at first i was hopeing it to be educational....now me thinking just a piece of propogander to keep getting funded...why else should we be happy that black holes exist other than to be paid to research them. A little bit dissapointed.
the mass actually does not matter, it's the density that makes all the difference....the earth could technically become a black hole *IF* it was compressed to the size of a dime.
well obviously. but in terms of current knowledge etc., you can say it is. for example....in physics infinity can be seen as reachable when a value is so small that it is insignificant like the gravity between two objects (there is always some pull, but when it is a certain distance away, the distance can be labelled as 'infinity').
one what?....and infinity actually isnt too hard to reach in terms of physics - all you have to do (from a gravitational point of view) is escape the mass' binding energy. if you match it, you will end up just outside of its pull. if you exceed it, any excess velocity you still have will carry you even further away.
cant reach the end to infinity like a hamster wheel you keep going trying to get to the end but you never do, there no number to infinity thats why it has the sleeping 8 for its symbol.
lmao. why has no one ever found it? what makes you think no one has ever found it? we already have. the pen on your desk has reached infinity relative to a star in the sky. if left alone, your pen will never be pulled into the gravitational pull of the star, or at least not for millions and millions of years...physics calls this infinity.
Infinity itself is unreachable and has no value, but in terms of physics it is.
you all fucked in the head this vid is closer to the truth than you Bible thumper's want to expect Just shut up everything in this vid came from NASA the went to Harvard stupid fucking loser
Finally something scientifically correct about black holes. I'm sick of seeing idiots say "if sun became a black hole all the planets would be sucked up". (our Sun isn't massive enough to collapse into a black hole anyway) Just knowing that light can't escape a black hole once inside, people think they're more massive than stars.
If they knew more about the gravitational lens effect of stars, and thought about the matter within the accretion disc...
True they are niot 'more' massive than stars, they have about the same mass.... BUT the mass is concentrated to such a small area that it bends or tears the fabric of space.
thank you for your truthful comment....so many ppl commenting r wrong. The sun has nowhere near enough matter to become a black hole.....the gravity has to be greater than the force of combustion.
You're right about the size of black holes too....the black hole itself is only a mile wide in diameter....thats extremely tiny in space...
@ScientistCat blackholes mass is so high that according to Steven Hawkin by traveling just at the edge of his event horizon u can travel in time. Even when theres a super massive star somewhere in a galaxy there will be a SUPER MASSIVE BLACK HOLE on the center of that galaxy way more powerfull and masive than any sta on his own galaxy. thats mean black hole wins...ALWAYS
@ScientistCat and how the BH gain mass in the fist place if not by simply disturbing his surroundings and eating everything around it, so this doc lies and lies again, A star and his solar system planets and surrounding stars are in "complete" balance, once a BH its created if affect drastically the equilibrium. In fact by simply removing one single planet of our on SS u can drastically change the equilibrium and bring chaos, lets not talk bout the chaos created if u change the Sun. ty
@stjester fi the sun were a black hole suddenly, it wouldnt eat our planets. it would have the same gravitational pull as the sun did. the planets wouldnt be disturbed.
@Vykkdraygo713 this is the formula of gravity g=GM/r2 and this is the escape velocity v= sqrt(2Gm/r) Thus as r decreases , the Escape velocity (from its surface) increases. Once the Star's radius drops below a certain point the escape velocity becomes greater than that of light. This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star.
@Vykkdraygo713 For instance, the escape velocity at the distance of the original surface of the star remains constant no matter how far the star collapses.What the collapse of the star allows is that one can get to get closer to the center of the star, while still having all of the star's mass "below" you.
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
@Vykkdraygo713 again this is the formula of gravity g=GM/r2 So, big star (large r) has much less gravity than small black hole (small r). Its funny how you discuss the laws of conservation of energy, pls refer to a SINGULARITY and the implications of that word when you talk bout laws of physics, pls dump that ol textbook of physics 101 cause these days are worthless.
@stjester@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
@stjester@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
the bH is pulling together the "grid" of space and time more closer together , and moving with it all that is around it and lets say for an example. Mercury closest planet to the sun was on poin x before BH but after BH its now on point Y. CONCLUSION: Its was disturbed and this doc lies and lies again...kk? thank!!!
@stjester its pulling together the "grid" of space in a smaller, compacted region, smaller than the sun originally was. any object's orbit would remain the same. dude are you twelve? if you disagree with this video then you disagree with modern physics altogether.
@Vykkdraygo713 wtf!! if you make the grid of space smaller the orbits of the planets would be closer to the epicenter of the anomaly in this case the BH. I dont disagree with modern physics but this vid is like physics for dummies, who r trying to make a stupid point just to impress dumb people. I suggest you take the formula of gravity and actually use it so im proving mathematically my point. This debate its not new its all around the web on serious physics forums i suggest u check em,k?ty
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
@stjester@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
The truth:they dont exist
The lie:they exist :P
cLozze1996 2 months ago
Black holes are often portrayed as some mythical beasts that eat stars and planets. It's time people realize that black holes are just the same old matter, but gathered into one spot.
TheLivirus 1 year ago
I've always seen black holes as sink drains...once theres no more water...the "black hole" dies. Yet, water still sits in the tub...same for space. I don't see a black hole growing past the critical point. Once it has all the matter it's gravity can get...it's done for. I'd be more worried about black holes disappearing...not getting larger. Take away the spin, take away the life.
magicyte 1 year ago
well, stjester's the only one to address me. but further on SMBH's, this was taken from wikipedia "Eventually, as a result of gravitational relaxation, all stars will either fall into central supermassive black holes or be flung into intergalactic space as a result of collisions." look up galaxy. So with this statement, and proof that black holes can eventually absorb enough matter to become an SMBH (no star is large enough to create one from the start), this vid is either old, or a fake.
84warhead 1 year ago
Hey Stupids Humans. well it's 70% of all but 10% aren't, 20% are like"I don't know or don't care". I mean it's all Theory like everything else on what humans believe.
You can't tell Whats what here or there. You need real Proof not pictures or Graphics and lies. It takes lots of studying, A LOT OF TIME to see what this or that is. In Truth, Humans aren't the most intelligent creatures.
Beliefs can't tell it. But you can with your studies.
Don't Believe what People SAY or Think. Choose Wisely.
BloodyFang117 1 year ago
@BloodyFang117 Are you non-human?
libraryquiet 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
their's something your theory hasn't gone over, w/ good reason, because it would be evidence enough to prove it wrong. a bh gravitational pull absorbs light itself. something stars definitly don't do. and just how strong is a bh gravity? well last time I checked, every circular galaxy (like ours) has a supermassive bh towards the center of it. a bh's gravity would be higher than the star it came from since it would have roughly the same amount of matter, but an extremely higher density.
84warhead 1 year ago
@84warhead thats the main point I was trying to explain to these fools, not only notice SMBH at center of galaxy, look globular clusters within
stjester 1 year ago
i believe that the black holes are high density matter, cold donw, since light would not escape gravity, but, from the poles, yes...
Take a look at the gamma ray bursts...they look as lasers...
I have a video with my idea about super-massive black-holes...
Thanks for the attention...:D
FelipeZucchetti 1 year ago
let me add to this stupid video full of lies that theres plenty of evidence that on the center of globular clusters THERES A BLACKHOLE, a black hole that was once a star who not only ate/moved/attract his stupid solar system but ALL THE STARS ON HIs NEIGHBORHOOD, kk? thanks!
stjester 1 year ago
Oh for fuck sake get over it i hope that earth gets sucked into a black hole and we all get demolished!! muahahahaha!!!!
Dan09Moo 1 year ago
this is cool. i feel smart!!!!!!!!
TheBreakingMPLS 1 year ago
i thought that the whole point of the black hole is that they have no volume and high mass.
bengelatuber 1 year ago
2 stars 1 of them became a blackhole and start sucking material from the other star even if their orbiting and millions of miles away that means this doc is wrong bout puting a black hole in center of our solar system
stjester 1 year ago
@stjester No, you're wrong in thinking that matter is stripped from all stars in the gravity of a black hole. In fact, we are in the gravitational field of every black hole in existence right now. Gravitational fields go on forever.
The doc's point was that as long as the mass is the same, there is no difference
tommyk77 1 year ago
@tommyk77 matter can be stripped from a star if the star is close enough to do so, theres plenty of hubble photos and videos that shows this. Let me put it this way if theres a super gigantic star on another solar system , that sun goes supernova/blackhole THE BLACKHOLE will eat the solar system plain an simple on time X.
stjester 1 year ago
@stjester Yes, but my point was that the distance has to be small enough for stars to have matter stripped. Our closest star (second closest, technically) is far too far away for our sun (as a black hole) to strip it of its matter
tommyk77 1 year ago
Black Holes
Allah said: So verily, I swear by the (Al-Khunnas Al-Jware Al-kunnas)
Quran 81 v 15-16
The meaning of words
Al-Khunnas: the disappeared
Al-Jware: move swiftly
Al-kunnas: the sweeper
Tofy710 1 year ago
Black Holes are an abstract mathematical figment of physics arrived at by dividing by 0, theorised like dark matter/energy to account for a failed gravitational only model of the universe, when gravity was found to be insuficient to hold galaxies together with thier angular momentum as it is. When the original BH theories didnt fit accretion discs were made up. It is clearly an electrical phenomenon & a plasma universe needs no undetectable imaginary stuff to account for all we observe
rubberdown1969 2 years ago
@rubberdown1969 Go publish that idea then and let's see how it stands up
tommyk77 1 year ago
Awesome video. I've always been fascinated by black holes. I already knew about the x-rays. Interesting still....first time I've ever heard of the outflows....... ^.-
Izilwen 2 years ago
if there money in one every counrty would figure how to teleport to one lol.
deluxedookie 2 years ago
its called spacetime not space lol
clintmak67 2 years ago
well this vid makes sance !
metaldark6 2 years ago
"keep funding us" is what it seems to be saying....at first i was hopeing it to be educational....now me thinking just a piece of propogander to keep getting funded...why else should we be happy that black holes exist other than to be paid to research them. A little bit dissapointed.
planto2005 2 years ago
this video is 100% correct.
the mass actually does not matter, it's the density that makes all the difference....the earth could technically become a black hole *IF* it was compressed to the size of a dime.
Srlancelot39 2 years ago
not 100%
vctop101dunk 2 years ago
@Srlancelot39
nothing is 100%, just dieing and eventually people will find a way to cheat that.
deluxedookie 2 years ago
well obviously. but in terms of current knowledge etc., you can say it is. for example....in physics infinity can be seen as reachable when a value is so small that it is insignificant like the gravity between two objects (there is always some pull, but when it is a certain distance away, the distance can be labelled as 'infinity').
Srlancelot39 2 years ago
@Srlancelot39
biggest limit to reaching one is human life span even going at the speed of light its would take forever.
deluxedookie 2 years ago
@deluxedookie
one what?....and infinity actually isnt too hard to reach in terms of physics - all you have to do (from a gravitational point of view) is escape the mass' binding energy. if you match it, you will end up just outside of its pull. if you exceed it, any excess velocity you still have will carry you even further away.
Srlancelot39 2 years ago
@Srlancelot39
if it not that hard why has no one ever found it?
cant reach the end to infinity like a hamster wheel you keep going trying to get to the end but you never do, there no number to infinity thats why it has the sleeping 8 for its symbol.
deluxedookie 2 years ago
lmao. why has no one ever found it? what makes you think no one has ever found it? we already have. the pen on your desk has reached infinity relative to a star in the sky. if left alone, your pen will never be pulled into the gravitational pull of the star, or at least not for millions and millions of years...physics calls this infinity.
Infinity itself is unreachable and has no value, but in terms of physics it is.
Srlancelot39 2 years ago
Unfortunately, you might not wish to cheat it.
Tom101229 2 years ago
you all fucked in the head this vid is closer to the truth than you Bible thumper's want to expect Just shut up everything in this vid came from NASA the went to Harvard stupid fucking loser
skechmasters 2 years ago
You are SO wrong. About 87% of material falls in to a black hole, and I wanna punch you for saying they blow. You probably think the earth is flat.
kwongo1 2 years ago
And you probably believe the sun, planets, and stars revolve around the Earth too.
LostLocke 2 years ago 6
yea they r u fucktard!
novacancy69 3 years ago
Finally something scientifically correct about black holes. I'm sick of seeing idiots say "if sun became a black hole all the planets would be sucked up". (our Sun isn't massive enough to collapse into a black hole anyway) Just knowing that light can't escape a black hole once inside, people think they're more massive than stars.
If they knew more about the gravitational lens effect of stars, and thought about the matter within the accretion disc...
1:57 that statement is so true.
ScientistCat 3 years ago 4
True they are niot 'more' massive than stars, they have about the same mass.... BUT the mass is concentrated to such a small area that it bends or tears the fabric of space.
coolhacky 3 years ago 2
thank you for your truthful comment....so many ppl commenting r wrong. The sun has nowhere near enough matter to become a black hole.....the gravity has to be greater than the force of combustion.
You're right about the size of black holes too....the black hole itself is only a mile wide in diameter....thats extremely tiny in space...
Srlancelot39 2 years ago
@ScientistCat blackholes mass is so high that according to Steven Hawkin by traveling just at the edge of his event horizon u can travel in time. Even when theres a super massive star somewhere in a galaxy there will be a SUPER MASSIVE BLACK HOLE on the center of that galaxy way more powerfull and masive than any sta on his own galaxy. thats mean black hole wins...ALWAYS
stjester 1 year ago
@stjester Technically, a black hole IS a collapsed STAR. At the BEGINNING of its life, it's no more massive than the star that gave birth to it.
It certainly does GAIN mass by sucking matter, but the MAJORITY of that matter forms the accretion disc and keeps SPINNING.
That's not mass Hawkins was talking about, it's DENSITY.
ScientistCat 1 year ago
@ScientistCat and how the BH gain mass in the fist place if not by simply disturbing his surroundings and eating everything around it, so this doc lies and lies again, A star and his solar system planets and surrounding stars are in "complete" balance, once a BH its created if affect drastically the equilibrium. In fact by simply removing one single planet of our on SS u can drastically change the equilibrium and bring chaos, lets not talk bout the chaos created if u change the Sun. ty
stjester 1 year ago
@stjester fi the sun were a black hole suddenly, it wouldnt eat our planets. it would have the same gravitational pull as the sun did. the planets wouldnt be disturbed.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
@Vykkdraygo713 this is the formula of gravity g=GM/r2 and this is the escape velocity v= sqrt(2Gm/r) Thus as r decreases , the Escape velocity (from its surface) increases. Once the Star's radius drops below a certain point the escape velocity becomes greater than that of light. This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star.
stjester 1 year ago
@Vykkdraygo713 For instance, the escape velocity at the distance of the original surface of the star remains constant no matter how far the star collapses.What the collapse of the star allows is that one can get to get closer to the center of the star, while still having all of the star's mass "below" you.
stjester 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
@Vykkdraygo713 conclusion, YES THEY WOULD BE DISTurUBED!
stjester 1 year ago
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
@Vykkdraygo713 again this is the formula of gravity g=GM/r2 So, big star (large r) has much less gravity than small black hole (small r). Its funny how you discuss the laws of conservation of energy, pls refer to a SINGULARITY and the implications of that word when you talk bout laws of physics, pls dump that ol textbook of physics 101 cause these days are worthless.
stjester 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stjester @stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
@stjester @stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
the bH is pulling together the "grid" of space and time more closer together , and moving with it all that is around it and lets say for an example. Mercury closest planet to the sun was on poin x before BH but after BH its now on point Y. CONCLUSION: Its was disturbed and this doc lies and lies again...kk? thank!!!
stjester 1 year ago
@stjester its pulling together the "grid" of space in a smaller, compacted region, smaller than the sun originally was. any object's orbit would remain the same. dude are you twelve? if you disagree with this video then you disagree with modern physics altogether.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
@Vykkdraygo713 wtf!! if you make the grid of space smaller the orbits of the planets would be closer to the epicenter of the anomaly in this case the BH. I dont disagree with modern physics but this vid is like physics for dummies, who r trying to make a stupid point just to impress dumb people. I suggest you take the formula of gravity and actually use it so im proving mathematically my point. This debate its not new its all around the web on serious physics forums i suggest u check em,k?ty
stjester 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stjester @stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stjester "This does not mean that the escape velocity increases for any given distance from the star. " you just proved yourself wrong. and something that has the same mass cannot create more or less gravitational potential energy than what it previously had, as that violates the law of conservation of energy. the planets would remain untouched, while orbiting a small black hole only a few kilometers in diameter.
Vykkdraygo713 1 year ago
@ScientistCat btw i suggetst u see the doc into the world with steven hawkin, its his latest doc, ty
stjester 1 year ago
@ScientistCat I'm also glad that there are people out here on youtube posting videos to correct misinformation.
Fyrewyrd 1 year ago
very very good!! :) 5/5
Basilisk525 3 years ago 2
booom
aFeTR 3 years ago