Extra Dimensions and Near Death Experiences

[Chronos251]

/watch?v=EMwOsUNI2Mc

[tokyocityrat]

I wonder why every thing has birth and death in this universe?...everything including the universe itself.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum No but Scientism is: "Scientism is the idea that natural science is the most authoritative worldview or aspect of human education, and that it is superior to all other interpretations of life."

But that's it: your arrogant rudeness and inability to debate on topic without the primitive use of insult just got you deleted. I think you may be the one who needs to grow up here.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening You are so predictable. I point out the gaping holes in your argument, and you launch into a hysterical tirade against me. You were the one that misrepresented me so thoroughly. I don't take kindly to that. Nothing in Greene's writings, nor in QM, supports your crackpot views. There is a good name for this; quantum woo. You've just taken a perfectly respectable scientific theory, and bastardized it to suit your own aesthetics. Forgive me if I call bullshit on that.

[3hcompany]

I am thinking I can add to your fine work here. I think I have located our string loop. It is when we connect our observer self, in the core of our being, with our projected self image and reflect upon it, as in when doing self reflection. Visually you have completed your sting loop when you see your inner light. Using your hearing sense it happens when you hear your inner music.  Each sensory system has its own feedback loop with its own way of experiencing your total energy.

[GoodyBob]

Keep up the great work...need more research! I just read the book by Betty Eadie, "Embraced by the Light", & others. Very interesting.

All seem to be even more support of all that Jesus taught.

[FallofDarkness55]

now this may seem like a radical notion but i think ideas inside the human mind is more or less formulating a 2 dimensional universe. instead of extra dimensions i'm thinking in terms of inwards. what if every idea imaginable is contained in a 2 dimensional realm and each of these ideas resides in an alternate 2 dimensional universe. basically what i'm saying is for example the harry potter universe may be real after all but in a 2 dimensional alternate universe which obviously we can't see.

[pinbac92]

look up astral projection. it ties in with experiencing extra dimensions and outer body experiences. as a kid this was something that i thought everyone could do so i rarely spoke about it. i would sometimes say to people, you know when you are having a dream but you realise it's a dream but you stop yourself from waking up and no one did, so a few people i know probably think im insane, but a freind told me about astral projection this year. definatley worth looking into anyway

[batfly]

It was revealed to me there is no such thing as you or I. A "You" or an "I" is an illusion.

There is only a single consciousness. "You" or "I" is what the consciousness uses to experience it's own creation without the burden of infinite knowledge.

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you is complicated and interesting...

If you despise another because they spoil the one, can you not cut it out of the one like a cancer? The alternative is to allow the cancer to spread.

Do you see?

[bonzihunter]

at 4:10 you say the "golden rule of religion... what you do unto others you do unto yourself" - that's not it! It's "Do unto others as you would like them to do unto you!!" lol get it right!! :P

You basically just said that anything you do to others will come back and affect you. Fair enough i guess, but that's more in line with the concept of karma than "the golden rule".

[smariot]

I don't think that's quite right either, people have different tastes, opinions, and desires.

What you want, someone else will more than likely be indifferent to, or even detest.

[zezt]

please check out this guy. Finding his video quite a few weeks back really inspired me to renew research into UFOs, and NDEs etc especially in relation to entheogens

He introduced me to Hadronic Mechanics which I an not that familiar with, claiming that QM and STT are...limited.

/watch?v=lF4y93hvDBY

[Awhiffofsuspicion]

mm, im sure the pineal gland is connected to nde, a gateway of sorts. im just pissed off waiting for cern to find the higgs particle, once we can confirm ex.sp.dims then evrything is up for grabs.

[NearDeathAwakening]

Totally share your excitement on that. Some scientists believe the "God-particle" will disprove "God" but once we have proof of extra dimensions everything is open.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening The God particle (terrible name) has nothing at all to do with god. The only function the Higgs has is to give particles their mass. Nothing more.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum That's a very dry interpretation. The Higgs exists in another dimension and if found this would be the scientific proof that there are extra dimensions in our universe. That is quite exciting both for both science and religion. And if you define God as "ultimate reality" and say that 'he' - it - exists in another dimension: then the Higgs has everything to do with God.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening This is nonsense. No one is saying the Higgs exists in anther dimension. At least, the standard model does not specify. You have absolutely bastardized actual scientific knowledge by expanding one simple prediction out far beyond rational boundaries. The Higgs has NOTHING to do with god (any god). Neither do extra dimensions. They merely exist as explanatory tools which determine the properties of elementary particles in M-Theory. Please stop propagating such nonsense.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum MIND your language - if you are so clever at least you should understand the idea of respect. I will give you that I am not a scientist but the suppression of the Higgs should be connected to extra dimensions, and linking it to the 11 dimensions of M-theory - surely has to do with extra dimensions. Either way, the point here (if you can focus on it) is that the proof of extra dimensions has very much something to do with God as ultimate reality existing in another realm (dimension)

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening Look, the Higgs has nothing at all to do with extra dimensions. The 6 or 7 other dimensions in String Theory are curled up so small that we can't see them (if they exist at all). There is nothing mysterious about them, they are simply other spacial geometries (Calabi-Yau shapes). There is no reason at all to invoke god. But if you want to invoke some 'ultimate reality' (whatever that could possibly mean) , don't misrepresent actual science in doing so. Thanks.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum Listen: don't tell me what to do or think - this is fundamentalism - which is not only found in religion but also in science as 'Scientism.' OK, forget the Higgs but do NOT tell me that I may not connect extra dimensions to God - this is my choice - and I find plenty of reason. Besides; many credible scientists become open to the spiritual and mysterious after looking at the evidence from QM - so just because you happen to be conservative does not make you the only religion.

[NearDeathAwakening]

Physicist Brian Greene (who is a bit more credible than you) links the Higgs to the old aether or "divine spirit" idea by Henry More and say that "we may well closely brush up against the thinking of Henry More in our scientific quest to understand space and time...To us, the usual concept of empty space may be similarly elusive, since the empty space we're privy to may always be filled with an ocean of Higgs field." The Fabric of the Cosmos, p 270

[NearDeathAwakening]

You will have to respect other people and their views: even if you disagree. If you keep up your nothing mysterious and no reason to invoke God as an absolute truth- you will come across as a fundamentalist believer in Scientism, who is on a crusade against religion. This would mean you are what you reject - and that's quite a blind angle for someone claiming to have knowledge.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening I'm not telling you what to do or think. I'm telling you what the actual science says, not what you would like it to say. "do NOT tell me that I may not connect extra dimensions to God"

I did no such thing. But only know that your 'god in extra dimensions' hypothesis is synonymous with the hypothesis that gravitational waves are carried by minuscule pixies on golden chariots. Neither has any evidence in favour of it, and both are unnecessary in furthering our understanding

[NearDeathAwakening]

As I said your religion is not the only one. Physicist Brian Greene (who is a bit more credible than you) links the Higgs to the old aether or "divine spirit" idea by Henry More and say that "we may well closely brush up against the thinking of Henry More in our scientific quest to understand space and time...To us, the usual concept of empty space may be similarly elusive, since the empty space we're privy to may always be filled with an ocean of Higgs field." The Fabric of the Cosmos, p 270

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening I don't have a religion sweetheart. And I seriously cannot believe that you just misrepresented Greene so spectacularly. The irony is that had you read any of his books, you would have been educated enough to know that you're talking absolute bollocks. But just for the lols, please provide a reference for your astoundingly ridiculous assertion. The quote you gave had NOTHING to do with anything, except him describing the Higgs field. Good god man.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum Your arrogance is flowing over now and I warn you that you will be deleted. I gave you the reference: The Fabric of the Cosmos, page 270. Anyway, whether he or you do not invoke the spiritual with the many theories and findings in QM: extra dimensions, quantum entanglement, quantum teleportation, etc. does NOT mean that I cannot or am not allowed. AND as I said I am not alone - so keep your conservative interpretation and Scientism to yourself and DO NOT tell me know to interpret.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum And just to make the connection clear for you: religious fundamentalists use the 'only absolute truth' and fear to dominate the discourse. You, and Sciencism, use the 'only and absolute truth' together with arrogance and insult. Whether your God is religion or science it is not what you believe in but the way you hold and handle your belief. In fact, it is your arrogance and urge to dominate others with your belief that makes you a fundamentalist and here you fit the pattern.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening I wonder if you're aware of just how much bullshit you're talking. For the last time, I do not adhere to scientism. Do you understand that? Is it simple enough for you to grasp? I have never said that there is absolute truth. Misrepresentation number 1. I have never said that 'science is my god'. Misrepresentation number 2. I have no urge to dominate others. Misrepresentation number 2. Again, YOU are the fundamentalist, because you will never change your mind. I will.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum Wrong: I have given you that I was not sure about the link between the Higgs and extra dimensions - but you have given NOTHING and KEPT on your attack. Then I gave you Greene's quote + link between the Higgs and More's divine spirit - still you arrogantly insult. This one-sided arrogant rigid stance of yours is what Scientism is - seeing "science as the most authoritative worldview." Like it or not you will have to accept belief in God AND more than one interpretation of science.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "you have given NOTHING and KEPT on your attack"

Actually, I'm just responding to your ridiculous misrepresentations. The only point I wanted to make was to clarify that the Higgs has nothing to do with these extra dimensions. Then you started accusing me of scientism. Why will I have to accept belief in god, if there is no evidence for its existence? Looks like you're the arrogant one in this exchange.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum You need to look yourself in the mirror: you do have an agenda. The fact is that I expressed uncertainty about the Higgs - but still you kept your focus on the one detail of my argument. To get away from the Higgs I even told you "Either way, the point here (if you can focus on it)" was extra dimensions and God (not the Higgs). See how you bite on and close your eyes like an angry dog? Greene linked the Higgs to More's divine spirit - so be fair and allow me a little space.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening You never explained what these extra dimensions have to do with god. Perhaps you can elaborate on that. Also, Greene does not link the Higgs to More's divine spirit in any way. It was a METAPHOR. Next you'll be saying that Einstein really meant god when he said that god does not play dice. But that isn't true. Physicists use metaphors all the time to express ideas or concepts. They're not meant to be taken literally.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum Agree: but so is God - a METAPHOR. God is not a bearded man in the sky but the ultimate level of reality - for me God is energy and could be consciousness or the bare information in our universe. So, what I mean by extra dimensions is: people always ask where is God and religion says: God is immaterial and in another realm. So, let's call 'him' energy living in these extra dimensions - and here is your proof. Really, you are fighting yourself here.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening Oh for goodness sake, if you were using god as a metaphor, then you should have specified.

"let's call 'him' energy living in these extra dimensions"

The great Wolfgang Pauli, when reviewing a paper by one of his students, remarked that it was so bad, it wasn't even wrong. In order for me to reply, there needs to be some coherent points of contention, some coherent structure. You've just flung words about which have no meaning.Dennett used the term 'deepity' to describe them

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum Not being a fundamentalist, I can admit that I actually had to look up the term 'deepity' and while overly technical its sounds interesting. However, while looking it up something better caught my attention: "term coined by Daniel Dennett in his 2009 speech to the American Atheists Institution conference."

If you want to come across as a scientists or an objective person, who does not believe in Sceitism: may I suggest that any reference to Atheism does not help your case.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "Not being a fundamentalist"

That made me laugh. Good one.

"you had to attack with full force. "

Toys out of the pram. This is a grown up conversation. Your argument is baseless, because you have misused basic scientific theories without understanding them.

"I know you better than you know yourself"

Nothing like a bit of wanton arrogance to back up your argument eh friend? You mistake arrogance with bewilderment at your nonsensical argument.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum My judgment of you is based on evidence from previous experience. Also having studied logic I can say with confidence that: "faith is not a good reason to believe in something" and "If there is no evidence in favour of something, there is no reason to accept it" - is indeed the same as saying that science "is the most authoritative worldview or aspect of human education, and that it is superior to all other interpretations of life." Trying to get out of that is very unreasonable.

[NearDeathAwakening]

And then what really proves the point is your motivation behind what you call a "grown up conversation" - which is as I said a full on attack. But, don't get me wrong: I am not crying - I have actually had some fun and amusement with your frustration (while I have been clam). However, the point is not your language but the motivation behind your "grown up" full force attack. The point is that your method of attack is fundamentalism, which is everywhere: in religion, science, politics, etc.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "your method of attack is fundamentalism"

Wrong. You've dismissed evidence as sufficient reason to accept a claim, yet (mis)used scientific theories to back up your case. So it seems evidence is at best ancillary to your argument. If there is no evidence for something, why should I accept it? Simple question.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening Faith is simply an excuse to believe in something on bad or non existent arguments. If you have good reasons to believe in something, don't call it faith. You keep equivocating my statement with scientism, in a laughably inept way. You really have no idea what it actually means do you. When you state that something is true, you need to provide the demonstration of its validity. This can take either the form of a scientific, mathematical, o philosophical proof.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum You are blind to yourself:

Nu. 1: You said about linking extra dimensions to God that, "Neither has any evidence in favour of it, and both are unnecessary in furthering our understanding." This clearly suggests that 1) without evidence there is no God and 2) you think we do not need God bec. we have science.

Nu. 2: The arrogant insulting language you use together with - if "you would have been educated enough" - clearly reflects fundamentalist superiority + urge to dominate.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "You are blind to yourself"

Bare assertion.

Point 1: If there is no evidence in favour of something, there is no reason to accept it. This is true for any truth claim. That doesn't mean that it doesn't exist, only that there is no evidence for it.

Point 2: I never said anything about not needing god because we have science. How the fuck do you come to these hysterical conclusions?

"clearly reflects fundamentalist superiority + urge to dominate. "

No. Good grief.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum No, you just don't like to look yourself in the mirror because it hurts.

The definition of "Scientism" is: "the idea that natural science is the most authoritative worldview or aspect of human education, and that it is superior to all other interpretations of life."

You say exactly the same: "If there is no evidence in favour of something, there is no reason to accept it." This is only true in science bec. e.g. religion you do not need evidence as such but can rely on faith.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening I still have no idea why you keep telling me the definition of scientism, as if I don't already know what it means. What on Earth does my statement that 'If there is no evidence in favour of something, there is no reason to accept it' have to do with scientism? If anything, it's a philosophical argument. Do you believe in the tooth fairy or the loch ness monster? If not, why not?

[NearDeathAwakening]

If you believe in truth you need to look directly into the mirror now: "If there is no evidence in favour of something, there is no reason to accept it" is equal to seeing science as "the most authority worldview" that is "superior to all other interpretations of life."

Now while you hold this mirror image, you will have to accept that different fields of human activity and understandings of knowledge have different ways to validate themselves - as e.g. religion is based on belief. 

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "s equal to seeing science as "the most authority worldview" that is "superior to all other interpretations of life.""

Complete and utter bullshit. I asked you a simple question. Do you believe in the existence of the tooth fairy, or the Loch Ness Monster. If not, why not?

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum You are getting rude again and trying to avoid the painful reality. Your statement: "If there is no evidence in favour of something, there is no reason to accept it" cannot be applied to e.g. religion bec. here you only need faith for something to be accepted. The fact that you use the premise of evidence outside science, here against God, makes you a believer in Scientism. According to you anything not proven by science should not be allowed - thus you attack and try to dominate.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "here you only need faith for something to be accepted"

But faith is not a good reason to believe in something. In fact it is a terrible reason.

"makes you a believer in Scientism"

It seems you need to actually understand the definition of scientism.

"According to you anything not proven by science should not be allowed"

Where did I say this? You're very good at making up stories friend. Well done.

Please answer the question:Do you believe in tooth fairies or LN monster?

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum It is the demand for scientific evidence in all areas of human life that is Scientism as reflected by your: "faith is not a good reason to believe in something." And where did you say what you just said? Well: "faith is not a good reason to believe in something" is the same as saying that only scientific evidence is a good reason to believe in something. And of course you said the same before: "If there is no evidence in favour of something, there is no reason to accept it." Clear?

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "It is the demand for scientific evidence in all areas of human life"

Which, for the last time, I am not advocating. You seem remarkably slow on the uptake.

"is the same as saying that only scientific evidence is a good reason to believe in something"

No, it isnt. Your powers of equivocating are not up to task at all.

"Clear?"

No, because not having enough information to accept a claim is NOT THE SAME THING as saying that the validity of the claim is not allowed.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum I am slow on the uptake? You are the one trying to divert this discussion on to tooth fairies and the LN. But you are right: its "NOT THE SAME THING" - IF, AND ONLY IF, you ALLOW the possibility for God. If you simply claim "not having enough information" then you have to allow for the possibility of God AND that other people may suggest this possibility. Can you? Can you allow me to interpret God into extra dimensions? No? Well, why not? Answer: Scientism - without proof no God.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "tooth fairies and the LN"

Which are, as far as evidence goes, on exactly the same pedestal as god.

"then you have to allow for the possibility of God "

I never said I didn't allow for it. That was a strawman of your making. But allowing for the possibility is not the same as accepting. There are an infinite number of absurdities that could be believed in.

"Can you allow me to interpret God into extra dimensions?"

That's your choice. But I can still attack your argument.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum Wrong again, we can debate reasonably but your arrogance and lengthy attack does not exactly display equal respect for my view and a desire on your path to allow for my interpretation. Does it now? Try to read some of your comments and the rude and insulting words you have used in order to try to dominate me. Try looking in the mirror - you could have gone to a more scientific channel in your taste or create your own - but no: you had to attack with full force.

[NearDeathAwakening]

And the reason I am so sure you are a fundamentalist - is because for years there are only two groups of people to attack in the way that you have: religious fundamentalists and believers in Scientism. So, sorry, after all my lengthy debates of fundamentalist on both sides - I know you better than you know yourself - I am your mirror.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "may I suggest that any reference to Atheism does not help your case."

May I suggest that this is a complete non-sequitur to my argument. Try again.

"does not exactly display equal respect for my view"

Respect is something that should be earned.

"Try to read some of your comments and the rude and insulting words you have used"

Likewise, try reading your own incessant misrepresentations of me that caused me to adopt the tone I did. It works both ways.

[NearDeathAwakening]

@BlankVellum You keep proving my point: "Respect is something that should be earned" - and therefore...? Help me out here: therefore, you have to right to be arrogant and insult people? This arrogant position is like religious fundamentalists who only love neighbors within their own religion.

Likewise?? Your very first words were: "This is nonsense" and from there you got more and more rude. And its not at just me: I even deleted some of your arrogant and rude comments made to others.

[NearDeathAwakening]

...both ways?? I have kept my language on topic, not crossed the line and only defended my position. You on the other hand have gotten more and more rude equal to your frustration that you could not win the argument or did not like what you heard. Remember, this is my channel, my house, you could have gone to another channel, done your own or looked for some scientific atheist channel. But no, here on my channel you found something that you really couldn't let go, while I have no where to go.

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "I have kept my language on topic"

A blatant untruth. I was merely pointing out the errors in your argument (which you ignored), and you launched into a childish tirade of misrepresentation.

"while I have no where to go. "

Toys out of the pram again. If you actually have an argument, feel free to use it. So far you've just misrepresented me consistently, made laughably inept arguments for truth claims,and think that the existence of extra dimensions will ultimately prove god

[BlankVellum]

@NearDeathAwakening "just because you happen to be conservative does not make you the only religion. "

That's one hilarious strawman. Well done. Do not dare suppose that because I don't take your anthropomorphic parochial drivel seriously, I'm therefore narrow minded. I go where the evidence takes me. If there is evidence for god, then I'll accept it. Your tactic seems to be to take genuine scientific theories, and tack them onto your own beliefs. That is fundamentally dishonest.

[NearDeathAwakening]

As I said you are a fundamentalist believer in Scientism by rejecting anything that has not been proven. Science is NOT the only religion. Dictionary: "Scientism is the idea that natural science is the most authoritative worldview or aspect of human education, and that it is superior to all other interpretations of life." - Sounds like a religion to me: just replace "science" with "my God" and then you have your standard religious fundamentalism.

[superpsilocybin]

@Awhiffofsuspicion particles are a misconception, it's more like complex geometrix shapes moving in sychrenous order. not following th properties of a *particle at all. Fractals, if you will

[BlankVellum]

@Awhiffofsuspicion The pineal gland? Are you serious? That was debunked long ago. It has nothing to do with the soul or anything 'supernatural'. Descartes was wrong, and so was everyone else after him.

[edmoochie]

thank you sir

[JaysonC117]

your very intelligent

[preacher4thedeaf]

I've really enjoyed this series. I know it took a lot of research and a lot of work and you should know that there are people who really appreciate the hours you put in.

[eVentyrBoost]

OK, I know extra dimensions, Heaven and God exists, but. Question: What dimension(s) is heaven in? I know that you only will have to be in the 7th dimension to experience infinity in one moment of this reality, the 8,9,10 and 11th, you will experience infinity of all the reality's in one moment. So, is heaven only one reality or many?

[NearDeathAwakening]

I don't know the answer to that question, since most NDErs call that dimension the Light and do not get a number of the dimension. However, I do know that many NDErs and researcher talk about the Layer-Cake Effect - that the dimensions are open ended - infinite.

[cadyfloss227]

Can you please tell me, do you know if Hell is real?

[NearDeathAwakening]

NDE research would say both yes and no. Life-reviews seem very real and the experience of hell in its dimension seem very real, but ultimately hell is not real because the ultimate truth is love. Hell, rather than a literal place, is seen as a separation from love (God) that is caused by negative projections of the mind. So, its kind of like having a negative thought - while in it this thought is very real but after when we change our mind to positive we can look back and see it was not real.

[addvictim539]

@cadyfloss227 ya its not. well, unless youre a republican. but if you have the brains/ability to question if biblestories/ fairytales come true, im optimistic for you

[k0smon]

cadyfloss227 : Download a book called "A Wanderer in the Spirit Lands". (Free)

This is a real eye-opener. There are lots of different types of hells.

[QuantumUni]

I heard their are 9 sub-planes in the astral plane. from the book astral dynamics.

[Schutzstaffel23]

unless you are talking about the christian religion Please Please dont use the word heaven and god. They are very ugly words to use in conversations like this...an eyesore if you will.

[eVentyrBoost]

Say what?! I cant use the word God and heaven? What do you want me to call God then? the light? prime creator? source of reality and consciousness? I can go on, and I'm not talking about religion, I'm talking about the science of multiple dimensions in relation to the NDE...

[Schutzstaffel23]

why do you have to say god though? When you say god people think of an old man in the sky. If you know what im saying. ''...The big electron...'' -George Carlin. lol

[Decoded69]

It's pretty much like Karma, Treat other the way you wish tobe treated

[Peacefuleagle44]

Thank you for this video..I thoroughly enjoyed it....I have been studying NDE's for a long time and it is interesting to hear what you talk about. I get a little confused, but all in all, it is amazing to hear you talk about this.

[superpaul3000]

...Near death experiences are what happen when your brain begins to shut down. I think you might be interested in a phenomenon called quantum immortality, its an actual implication of these proposed extra dimensions. Sorry to bust your bubble like this but I wish you luck on your quest for knowledge, just make sure you avoid the BS.

[breastimus]

well if you're a physicist you should probably know that NDE are not what happens when your brain is shutting down. This is a delicate debate since the actual time the NDE happens is unclear. I'm sure Mr.Physicist has heard of Pam Reynolds. You're just being overally arrogant and seriously think that people who have faith and are enlightend are just as ignorant as children who believe in santa. Stop posting your beliefs as facts.

[carlindelco]

Your the only one who apparently is espousing the BS

[superpaul3000]

...First of all not everything in the universe is entangled. Its actually pretty hard to get two things to become entangled and things also lose their entanglement very easily. Even the best quantum computers right now only have 5 pairs of entangled particles. Extra dimensions are only speculative, but experiments like the double slit are a good indication that this is a valid possibility...

[superpaul3000]

NearDeathAwakening I know you are trying to find out what the universe is all about and thats great,but try not to jump to conclusions like this without knowing what youre talking about...

[superpaul3000]

Dont listen to anything this guy says, I dont know how he got published but he obviously does not understand anything about physics. It seems to me he just watched some TV shows on physics and read some wiki articles about these phenomena and came up with these bogus conclusions. Im a physicist, I would know...

[RESPONSE67]

so you're frightened of death

[WildCherry7777]

This is kind of confusing but it's interesting.

[An0nym0usPunK0930]

The "reaction" i meant was our "natural reaction" towards outer-force that "provokes" certain stimuli in our body, resulting in same effect(to everyone). Certain drugs leads to certain effect. You might be wasting your time, this could all be hallucinations due to dying brain. If i were you, i would look into neuropsychology, or biology. You are studying the wrong field, not to mention your whole idea depend on a theory that is not even validated.

[NearDeathAwakening]

I respect your view but you should stop telling people what to believe or what field to study. Religion tried indoctrination for too long, so please let me have my view as I respect yours.

The double-slit and Aspect experiments are scientific evidence that the fundamental level is interconnected energy. That's all I need to support a possible spiritual reality.

[NearDeathAwakening]

I am not you so give up your "if I were you" because you are not. I am a philosopher and not interested in your suggested fields. Also as a philosopher, I am interested in pushing the limit of what we know and this does not happen through limiting my thinking to what can be validated.

[An0nym0usPunK0930]

7 other dimensions string theory suggests might as well be a mathematical deception. There is no way to testify its hypothesis, and this whole "nde" experience might as well be explained with our current knowledge of science. I personally believe it is just malfunctioning brain, oxygen deprivation, perhaps its connected with our subconsciousness as well. Light, life reviews and such effects might not be a "spiritual" thing, but our reaction towards death, nothing special just chemicals.

[k0smon]

punk0930 : The ability to travel away from the body and bring back correct information disproves your theory of brain chemicals being the sole cause of NDE.

[lukeemersonG]

I agree, well said!!!

[fbastani]

thanks for this posting my friend

[fogggygyrl]

This is fantastic! Thanks so much for sharing this. :)

[GODPARTICAL]

I have had a near death experiance and since then i see death as a gift,I have no fear of dying and this because of the amazing experiance i had in my N.D.E its totally true that you feel all peace.. all you are is just a feeling a great great great feeling your body is no more untill you come out of your N.D.E

[tamagochita]

What did u see in ur NDE?

[QuantumPamm]

Why when a muslim dies and has a NDE he sees Mohamed, when a Cristian person dies they see jesus, a buddhist sees buddha....ect.......i think NDE may be all in the mind.

[NearDeathAwakening]

Because the Light or other dimension interacts with the mind in what is a co-created experience where we project our conditioning into the other dimension.

However, if you look at the core experiences of the NDE: the Light, life-reviews, etc. - these are universal and not conditioned by culture.

Rene

[HaasbiAllah]

you're very active my friend, you open a new channel and you already made 5 videos :)

I love your approach to these subjects i.e. reconcile science and spirituality, this is exactly what I do, and it seems everyone of my search criteria on youtube brings up one of your videos ;)