@Caucasianpride1 What, you are going to answer my questions for me? Let me tell you, They believe in racial profiling, which is a violation of my freedoms. They believe in segregation (Sam Dickson once ran for I believe Georgia Governor on a segregationalist platform). That's a violation of my freedoms. And Taylor once pushed for forced sterilization for welfare recipients. Another violation.
So what would be racist about opposing that? Are you saying only white people think this way?
@NoPawn :...they believe in "freedom" to associate with everyone you like! If you knew what were yo talking about you would also know that the racial profiling, not for racist purposes, is used today and is not prohibited anywhere. Without racial profiling police wouldn't be able to work in some areas. Study some stats on US crime and you will find "racial" profiling very useful from the point of view of law enforcement. How does it violate you freedom? Please explain.
@Caucasianpride1 I believe the 4th and 14th amendments explains it best, as evidenced by the fact that it when they made racial profiling illegal it was based on them. So if a police officer can't do their job without it, they don't need to be a police officer. Equal protection under the law and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Remember that. Stats can also show that if cops shot eveyone they pulled over there will be fewer cars on the street too.
@NoPawn ..and i can say the same to you: "let the blacks have their own way and let's see what freedom white people will enjoy"...shall i remind you South Africa as an example of "equality" for everyone?
@Caucasianpride1 Ummmm...South Africa spent the 60 some-odd years prior doing what AmRen associates like Dan Roodt want. It didn't work. And even with that, things seemed to be just fine during the World Cup last year, despite all the Chicken Littles on the right warning of all the calamities happening.
@NoPawn ..Umm...Sout Africa was a very prosperous nation and probably you don't know that crime is rampant there and the country is going down to the drain....after blacks took control. World Cup? LOL...well even a messed up Country like SA puts out on the streets the best show they can..to show the world they can do it. Truth is different thou...
@controversyking Relax, I was watching Robin Hood. I am not on the computer 24-7. Oh, and I can think of more than a few white people who would prefer you don't speak for them, including one who shares a bed with me :)
@controversyking Well, I would make you miserable as hell then, and I know a few white people that do all of that who would make you downright miserable!
Let no one say Free Speech in America is safe. It's about time for a radical rightwing movement to emerge in order to give these leftwing troglodytes a taste of their own medicine.
@NoPawn Well it sounded like you were being an obnoxious jerk. Forgive me if this is an erroneous assessment, but usually when someone says they're willing to die for a just cause, you wouldn't tell them they're "obliged" because it conveys an indecent disregard for human life.
I wonder how many of the clowns in this video will risk their lives to enforce censorship on a free society?
@strong8action You're right. I am being an obnoxious jerk. I do that to people who want to pretend they are defending free speech when they fight for those like the AmRen crowd who want to take that and other freedoms away from anyone that is not white. In other words, don't pass off that free speech crap on me. I doubt highly you are about it.
@strong8action Well, you have to let me answer the question before you make declarations like that. We can start with racial profiling, go on to deporting non white immigrants regardles of legal or illegal status, and just as an aside talk about forced sterilization of people on welfare. And why stop with Taylor? You have Tom Metzger among your videos. He's actually been held responsible for people of color getting killed and so has past associates of his. Stop acting like you don't know.
@NoPawn Jared Taylor makes an intelligent argument for "racial profiling". For example, men are known to commit higher rates of crime than women, so its rational for cops to pay more attention to men than women. This is just common sense.
You claim to hold democratic values, but a democracy would've permitted debate on why racial profiling is right or wrong. Instead you used threats of violence to make a hotel break contract.
The issue of immigration and welfare also deserve debate.
@strong8action In other words, AmRen advocated taking freedoms from someone who is not white, when I said it, it wasn't a lie, and you defend it - while at the same time demanding that I respect your rights! In one fell swoop you made yourself a liar, a hypocrite and a fool.
@NoPawn How am I a hypocrite? Unlike you, I support everyone's right to free speech and freedom of assembly. I may not like what you say, but I defend your right to say it because censorship is antithetical to democracy. Wake up silly, it is you who is the filthy, lying hypocrite.
@NoPawn I never said I wanted to restrict anyone's rights. You continue to make this up!
I advocated freedom of speech so that the democratic process can be upheld. Issues like immigration, and law enforcement should be part of a national debate.
You're a hypocrite for claiming to value democracy whilst simultaneously using bullying tactics to suppress the viewpoints of those who disagree.
@NoPawn The first case of racial profiling involved a white criminal. I take no position on that issue, and neither defend nor rejected racial profiling. However, if there's an intelligent, rational argument, people should have a right to hear both sides, and not be censored by you. In the absence of free debate, you've taken the liberty of twisting the concept of "racial profiling" into a meaningless sound bite that Am-Ren wants to take away the rights of non whites, but you've failed.
@NoPawn As expected you have selective hearing. I didn't answer your question because I was explaining how the first case of racial profiling was used to apprehend a white criminal. Therefore, its fallacious to use "racial profiling" as a hammer to attack Am-Ren as wanting to "take rights from non whites".
Are you speaking about the right to commit crime? The fact is Am-Ren advocates equality for all. You advocate racial preferences for non whites. This shows you are a hypocrite.
@strong8action AmRen doesn't advocate equality for all if they support racial profiling, and they are most certainly not talking about profiling white people when they do it. And once again, you didn't answer the question. Are you going to punk out of saying exactly what it would be that I disagree with?
@NoPawn You've been brainwashed and don't understand the argument for racial profiling. "Race" is only one variable in a criminal profile, including age, gender, demeanor, as well as, occupation, education level, and much more. It has been used by the FBI to catch criminals of all races. For example, if some middle eastern men threatened to hi-jacked planes, police shouldn't focus their attention on 80 year old white women because they don't fit the profile. That's "racial profiling"!
Obvious here that minorities don't want "freedom of speech" it applies only to them not to others: I see a bad future for America here.
Caucasianpride1 11 months ago
@Caucasianpride1 Let the AmRen types get their way and let's see what freedoms people who are not white have, eh?
NoPawn 10 months ago
@NoPawn : what is the AmRen type like according to YOUR racist view? Or racism is only "white"? Pathetic..
Caucasianpride1 10 months ago
@Caucasianpride1 What, you are going to answer my questions for me? Let me tell you, They believe in racial profiling, which is a violation of my freedoms. They believe in segregation (Sam Dickson once ran for I believe Georgia Governor on a segregationalist platform). That's a violation of my freedoms. And Taylor once pushed for forced sterilization for welfare recipients. Another violation.
So what would be racist about opposing that? Are you saying only white people think this way?
NoPawn 10 months ago
@NoPawn :...they believe in "freedom" to associate with everyone you like! If you knew what were yo talking about you would also know that the racial profiling, not for racist purposes, is used today and is not prohibited anywhere. Without racial profiling police wouldn't be able to work in some areas. Study some stats on US crime and you will find "racial" profiling very useful from the point of view of law enforcement. How does it violate you freedom? Please explain.
Caucasianpride1 10 months ago
@Caucasianpride1 I believe the 4th and 14th amendments explains it best, as evidenced by the fact that it when they made racial profiling illegal it was based on them. So if a police officer can't do their job without it, they don't need to be a police officer. Equal protection under the law and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. Remember that. Stats can also show that if cops shot eveyone they pulled over there will be fewer cars on the street too.
NoPawn 10 months ago
@NoPawn ..and i can say the same to you: "let the blacks have their own way and let's see what freedom white people will enjoy"...shall i remind you South Africa as an example of "equality" for everyone?
Caucasianpride1 10 months ago
@Caucasianpride1 Ummmm...South Africa spent the 60 some-odd years prior doing what AmRen associates like Dan Roodt want. It didn't work. And even with that, things seemed to be just fine during the World Cup last year, despite all the Chicken Littles on the right warning of all the calamities happening.
NoPawn 10 months ago
@NoPawn ..Umm...Sout Africa was a very prosperous nation and probably you don't know that crime is rampant there and the country is going down to the drain....after blacks took control. World Cup? LOL...well even a messed up Country like SA puts out on the streets the best show they can..to show the world they can do it. Truth is different thou...
Caucasianpride1 10 months ago
@controversyking Relax, I was watching Robin Hood. I am not on the computer 24-7. Oh, and I can think of more than a few white people who would prefer you don't speak for them, including one who shares a bed with me :)
NoPawn 1 year ago
@controversyking Well, THESE whites won't do what THEY want, that's for damn sure!
NoPawn 1 year ago
@controversyking Well, I would make you miserable as hell then, and I know a few white people that do all of that who would make you downright miserable!
NoPawn 1 year ago
White people are now the enemy in our own country.
doomsdaypreacher 1 year ago
@doomsdaypreacher Well conservatives I would say that about, not white people in general.
NoPawn 1 year ago
Let no one say Free Speech in America is safe. It's about time for a radical rightwing movement to emerge in order to give these leftwing troglodytes a taste of their own medicine.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action Not gonna happen. Get over it.
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn Get over what, the leftwing attack on Free Speech? No sir, I won't "get over it", I will give my life to defend it.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action Works for me.
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn Typical smart ass comment by a left winger fag.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action What else was there to be said? You're being obliged!
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn Well it sounded like you were being an obnoxious jerk. Forgive me if this is an erroneous assessment, but usually when someone says they're willing to die for a just cause, you wouldn't tell them they're "obliged" because it conveys an indecent disregard for human life.
I wonder how many of the clowns in this video will risk their lives to enforce censorship on a free society?
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action You're right. I am being an obnoxious jerk. I do that to people who want to pretend they are defending free speech when they fight for those like the AmRen crowd who want to take that and other freedoms away from anyone that is not white. In other words, don't pass off that free speech crap on me. I doubt highly you are about it.
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn What freedoms has AmRen advocated taking away from anyone who is not white? That's a lie you made up out of thin air, a piece of propaganda.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action Well, you have to let me answer the question before you make declarations like that. We can start with racial profiling, go on to deporting non white immigrants regardles of legal or illegal status, and just as an aside talk about forced sterilization of people on welfare. And why stop with Taylor? You have Tom Metzger among your videos. He's actually been held responsible for people of color getting killed and so has past associates of his. Stop acting like you don't know.
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn Jared Taylor makes an intelligent argument for "racial profiling". For example, men are known to commit higher rates of crime than women, so its rational for cops to pay more attention to men than women. This is just common sense.
You claim to hold democratic values, but a democracy would've permitted debate on why racial profiling is right or wrong. Instead you used threats of violence to make a hotel break contract.
The issue of immigration and welfare also deserve debate.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action In other words, AmRen advocated taking freedoms from someone who is not white, when I said it, it wasn't a lie, and you defend it - while at the same time demanding that I respect your rights! In one fell swoop you made yourself a liar, a hypocrite and a fool.
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn How am I a hypocrite? Unlike you, I support everyone's right to free speech and freedom of assembly. I may not like what you say, but I defend your right to say it because censorship is antithetical to democracy. Wake up silly, it is you who is the filthy, lying hypocrite.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action Oh, okay. It's all those OTHER rights you wish to restrict. Gotcha. That's sooooooo much different!
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn I never said I wanted to restrict anyone's rights. You continue to make this up!
I advocated freedom of speech so that the democratic process can be upheld. Issues like immigration, and law enforcement should be part of a national debate.
You're a hypocrite for claiming to value democracy whilst simultaneously using bullying tactics to suppress the viewpoints of those who disagree.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action If you don't want to restrict anyone's rights, do not defend racial profiling. Keeps down the confusion.
By the way, just what about those viewpoints would those be that I disagree with, hmmmmmm?
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn The first case of racial profiling involved a white criminal. I take no position on that issue, and neither defend nor rejected racial profiling. However, if there's an intelligent, rational argument, people should have a right to hear both sides, and not be censored by you. In the absence of free debate, you've taken the liberty of twisting the concept of "racial profiling" into a meaningless sound bite that Am-Ren wants to take away the rights of non whites, but you've failed.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action As expected, you didn't answer my question. What are those viewpoints I disagree with?
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn As expected you have selective hearing. I didn't answer your question because I was explaining how the first case of racial profiling was used to apprehend a white criminal. Therefore, its fallacious to use "racial profiling" as a hammer to attack Am-Ren as wanting to "take rights from non whites".
Are you speaking about the right to commit crime? The fact is Am-Ren advocates equality for all. You advocate racial preferences for non whites. This shows you are a hypocrite.
strong8action 1 year ago
@strong8action AmRen doesn't advocate equality for all if they support racial profiling, and they are most certainly not talking about profiling white people when they do it. And once again, you didn't answer the question. Are you going to punk out of saying exactly what it would be that I disagree with?
NoPawn 1 year ago
@NoPawn You've been brainwashed and don't understand the argument for racial profiling. "Race" is only one variable in a criminal profile, including age, gender, demeanor, as well as, occupation, education level, and much more. It has been used by the FBI to catch criminals of all races. For example, if some middle eastern men threatened to hi-jacked planes, police shouldn't focus their attention on 80 year old white women because they don't fit the profile. That's "racial profiling"!
strong8action 1 year ago