Added: 5 years ago
From: scuzzler
Views: 7,207
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (22)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So SLM gave money and now Lee says he HIMSELF didn't give? Sounds like yet more untruths, smoke and mirrors from "Smilin' Stan"... the guy's word is as truthful as his wig...

  • Thank God there are powerful people out there in the media who don't support the Republican scalawags who'd like to eliminate the "lower classes" and take over this country like Darth Vader and his satanic Imperial cronies

  • With great power comes great responsibility

  • Stan Lee has admitted he traded $100,000 campaign contribution checks to Hillary's Senate campaign with his partner Peter Paul so Hillary could lie to the public that Stan Lee was one of her biggest contributors- not Peter Paul. That reimbursement of a $100K is a felony.

  • This video is a big nothing. What's the big scandal supposed to be? Hillary said that Stan gave the money. Stan Lee Media gave the money. Or, there wasn't any money. Who cares?

    This is the best you guys can do? Give it up. By the way, Obama is going to be a great president. Bush is the worst ever. When will you guys ever learn.

  • Stan Lee reminds me of myself. Just a nice guy, who tells it like it is.

  • thankyou for the post. hillary needs to be exposed and removed from the next presidential election.

  • this guy is full of crap

  • to historicalirony: what guy is full of crap? The attorney asking the questions or Stan Lee, the man swearing under oath to facts? Lee is swearing that he was involved in exchanging $100,000 checks. He is swearing that he gave no money to Hillary's campaign. Yet, in her 4th amended FEC report, after the FEC determined the first three reports were false, Hillary reported to the FEC that Lee gave 225K. Hillary is still lying. How surprising is that?

  • its one person against another, you republicans are the easiest to fool b/c u tend to be less educated...ever wonder why 77% of those in academia are democrats?

  • yeah historicalirony,

    get out of hillarys snoot

  • This has nothing to do with Clinton. Stan Lees former business partner, who Stan is sueing in this deposition, gave money to the Clinton senate campagin and was trying to hide the donation as being given by Stan Lee. It says nothing about Stan Lee. It says nothing about Clintion. It says that Stan Lee's former business partner is a crook. Which is why Stan Lee is ttaking a deopsition and suing the guy, Nice try and editing it to death and trying to smear Clinton.

  • You would never agree that there was any wrongdoing by the Clintons if it was done in Yankee Stadium in front of 80,000 fans on live TV. Nobody cares what you think.

  • YOU care enough to respond. DUH.

  • musenla - you never let facts get in the way, do you? Hillary is on notice that Lee gave no money, yet in her 4th amended FEC report, she fraudulently claimed that he gave 225K. She is on notice and has refused to change the false report and refund the illegal money. Stan Lee is not suing Peter Paul - you are either ignorant of the facts or are deliberately lying about that. You really like shooting off you mouth when you know absolutely no facts about the case, don't you?

  • Just for the record, I didn't write the above comment. I left my youtube account open on someone else's computer and he inadvertently used my account to post the comment. I'll let him know of your response.

  • Thanks for the clarification. I've read thousands of pages of documents for my documentary film. The person who made the response clearly has no idea whatsoever of what he speaks. Let your friend show his face so he can be publicly and figuratively eviscerated. Tell him first to wipe off the Clinton DNA that is dripping down his chin.

  • On second thought, after a comment like that, never mind.

  • Fine, never mind. It would be like bringing a little tiny knife to a gunfight. Your friend's comments show himself to be a fool using your screen name.

  • I love it. The New York Times media will never speak of this like a child with autism. So what if this scandal is untelevisable; YouTube is like TV2. I have many democrat friends who say they will never vote for another Clinton.

  • i dont get it, i didnt get it....i dont get it...should i care, i dont get it.

  • I love stuff like this, just so weird and untelevisable. Him and Michael Jackson at his studio is great too.

  • The Clintons lie with thw Bushes. For more info - seek Mena.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more