Stephanopoulos: "Bill Clinton has no character problem"

[lvgolden]

Bill Clinton has no character.

[asterisk911]

@alitosbigears That's a silly argument. ALL of the presidential candidates are cordially invited to beat all of the others and win the plurality of electoral votes. You might as well say that Clinton and Bush cost Perot the election. Think about it: if both Clinton and Bush had withdrawn in October, there's an excellent chance Perot would have won.

Um... but all of the candidates a required to compete against all of the other candidates. Them's the breaks.

[asterisk911]

Once.

[larilin]

@alitosbigears The way Clinton "meant the definition of the word 'is' " happens to be the only reasonable way to understand it in that context. It's not his fault that some people are too stupid to understand that, including lots of repubtards.

[xukeith33]

what a loser, george!!

[Tsnore]

George Stephenflopolous?

[msbrando]

And this guy Stephanopoulos is a "journalist" now in USA. hahahhah.

USA DOESN'T HAVE NEWS. IT IS ONLY HAVE ENTERTAINMENT MEDIA THAT THEY CALL THEMSELVES "NEWS MEDIA".

[jasmineskydancer]

Stephanopoulos is the problem now...

[lumpagogo]

@jasmineskydancer

POTUS Bill Stinkton is back with yet another book with nothing new in it. We can also look at Rooosh Lim-boo--23 years of dull. Who fault this worthless drivel have gone non-stop from 1783--present?

[Danbo342]

George Stephanopoulos is great. I hope he never gets corrupt and states things like he sees them. He's always impressed me.

[RightWingHunter666]

I had problems in my marriage my fucking wife would kick my fucking ass. Problems in your marriage means you fucking other chicks.

[BoogieWithStew]

Watch and learn folks, this is how one becomes "Chief Washington Correspondent" at ABC News. At least it worked for Stephanopoulos...

[chinchonchinchon]

What about Bush?

He got you into Iraq! Now, the middle east is all for Iran with no buffer zone!

Thanks for attacking clinton!

[gregor7700]

Keep lying George, you two bit punk.

[jksonny]

This is the same guy who was one of the first to predict Clinton's impeachment.

[Market42Fan]

Bill Clinton has no character problem?

George, this isn't amateur nite at the comedy club.

[Thejbirdy]

George, backstabbing weasel.

[TheKSE1990]

Fuck Sam Donaldson.

[freesoul2005]

So what if he has a heart and a working dick?

I am more interested in American president working for ppl. And Clinton did. Bush recklessly destroyed American power from within and abroad. So what he didnt fuck a bimbo? Who fucking cares?

[Starskylina87]

That's Right Bush mess it all up when the attacks occur!

now we are struggling to bounce back

[OCV7]

I agree completely I tired of hearing people defend the right to the death and they defend bush who fucked up alot of things.

and Clinton? I don't care of he fucked janet Reno but he did throw that much shit like Bush.

[lashkaretoiba]

@freesoul2005

Your messing the real issue which is he commited perjury. It's not the blowjob it's the lie.

[larilin]

@lashkaretoiba Ha ha... yeah, unlike you he's "messing" the real issue, and Bill Clinton made a miss out of things with the blowjobs. The things is though, he did not perjure himself, he said "there IS no such relationship" at a time when there was none.

[ScienceTalk100]

He said, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Monica Lewinsky." Stephanopolous has always protected Clinton. He thought that by getting regular men to identify with Clinton (those who had extramarital affairs), people would forget all about Clinton's bald-faced lie to the American public. And it worked perfectly. The mainstream shifted the focus of Clinton's tale to one of sexual exploration and a man caught cheating from the much more serious offense of lying under oath.

[larilin]

@ScienceTalk100 OK, you repubtard nitwit: Bill Clinton said those words you are quoting at a press conference. You cannot perjure yourself at a press conference. It has never been proven that Bill Clinton lied under oath. What's more inmportant though, is the anti-democratic, anti-consitutional agenda of the republicans - they tried to overturn an election. How can you vote for a party that is morally bankrupt?

[mtb416]

@larilin Bill Clinton lied to the American people, that really isn't up for discussion.

Side note: When you use words like "repubtard" you sound like a "retard."

Only a soulless lawyer (is that redundant?!) would argue such a thing. Dishonesty is dishonesty.

Also, with the way Democrats have been working, it's very hard - some might say impossible - to take a constitutional high ground. They've stepped on religious and pro-liberty toes.

You, fellow youtuber, are intellectual bankrupt.

[larilin]

@mtb416 All politicians lie to the people, the question is about what and to what extent. Clinton lied about getting a blow job - big deal! Ronald Reagan lied about cutting deals with the terrorists in Teheran and selling arms lillegally to latin American guerillas. GWB lied to the American people in order to be able to go to war.

Repubtards only care about the constitution when it serves their purposes. Most of them don't even understand it. They think it's a libertarian policy document.

[mtb416]

@larilin The world is much more complex than you seem to think. Arming less than friendly people to fight much less friendly people is unfortunately a very strategic move, one that can certainly backfire. I don't blame any politician on any side for having to make such a decision. It's a very difficult, but sometimes necessary, move. Ronald Reagan put an end to the Cold War. In that respect, it's obviously a positive outcome

It's entirely pointless to respond to your last paragraph.

[larilin]

@mtb416 Moreover, you "don't blame any politician on any side for having to make such a decision." Bullshit! First of all, what happened to "Dishonesty is dishonesty"? And secondly, if Bill Clinton had done anything like Iran-Contras, you would have been all over him with accusations of soullessness and dishonesty. Let me put it this way: Is "hypocritical republican" a redundancy?

[mtb416]

@larilin Democrats backed Bush in going to war. You really need to come to terms with that. The "we didn't have any information" or "we were given wrong information", which has been used incessantly by Monday Morning Quaterbacking Democrats, is an outright lie. You should know that. Remember, "All politicians lie to the people."

Strange how you only apply "All" to "Repubtards."

[larilin]

@mtb416 Why do I need to come to terms with that? I never claimed that "no Democrat backed GWB on the Iraq war." Strange? I responded to your hyperpartisan attack on Bill Clinton. I'm a reasonable and moderate person, unlike you who are intellectually bankrupt and a hypocrite. You know, as Jesus said: Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?

[TankSombrero]

rezactly

[mtb416]

@freesoul2005 Clinton bombed people, created the greatest program for Mexican drug smugglers ever (NAFTA), and had the easiest Presidency of any President in the latter half of the 20th century. The largest creation of wealth (i.e. IT boom) had nothing to do with Clinton).

You or I could have done as well as that man. He's a smart man, no doubt about it. But so was Jimmy Carter, who was an absolute awful one. Clinton was blessed with an economy that could do no wrong, thanks to IT guys.

[gbarb74]

@freesoul2005 It is people with your same attitude that said "So what if these mortgages we are packaging and selling are worthless, if they are stupid enough to buy them that is their problem."

Personal honesty evidently means little to nothing to you, but when making a decision that will effect others it counts for a lot. I don't agree with Bush on most things but at least he wasn't a smooth talking liar only looking out for himself like the two crooks before and after him...

[mtb416]

@gbarb74 That is much how I feel. Bush had plenty of faults, but at least he seemed like a President that would screw you from the front, not from behind.

[royski9]

saw him in a porno-not kidding

[jengsu26]

Wow! He was only 31 at the time...so young to be in such a high profile position!

[Snotra]

Word smith!

[BobReidy]

Yes he does.He is a draft dodger.A man who refuses to serve is country is not entitled to run it.Bush 41 was a war hero and the American people voted for that coward instead.What a shame.

[spurgistan]

Last four years? Same thing.

[llehman84]

Well the American voters disagreed with you...twice. So sit down and shut up.

[lashkaretoiba]

@llehman84

You are a fine example of tyranny.

[mashdown08]

yea a racist bastard is what he is