I know this vids audio is distorted, but the weird thing is, thats almost how it was in person. Ever been by something so loud you can't make it out? A concert where the volume is way to high? Same thing. So this is actually a pretty good representation of what it was like being so close to this. At their air show, the sound was very different because of the distance. I hope they demonstrate it again.
An artist group out of San Francisco called "Survival research labs" made one of these engines for performances,it's fed air from a car engine driven industrial blower. It was designed to make the maximum amount of noise,and does so with deafening effectiveness! I've seen the windows on downtown buildings shimmering from the low frequency sounds that thing generated. Look it up, it's worth a view!
I believe that in the 1943-44, if you hear the engine goes at 1:11, the English were not cheering like those who did in the video. That silence would had been deafening.
@harley333man are you insane? those things were like nuclear bombs,only a little less strong. you could never carpet bomb with a V1,since its too big for any WW2 plane to carry,and london was ONLY carpet bombed.
@gokoo123 Once the Germans lost their ground launch facilities they fired V-1s from He-111s over the North Sea. The warhead on a V-1 was around 2,000 pounds far less destructive power than even a tactical nuclear weapon. Had the Germans been able to launch sufficient quantities of V-1s at the same time & get them to their target the effect would have been like carpet bombing. However, V-1s were not a war winning weapon and a great deal of mythology has grown up about their effectiveness.
@gokoo123 A quick search on google....... "Almost 9,250 V1's were fired against London, but less than 2,500 reached their target. In flight they were almost as vulnerable as their ramps: about 2,000 were destroyed by anti-aircraft gunfire; 2,000 by fighter planes, and almost 300 by barrage balloons."
Yes, this engine is to scale. This is an engine made by Ford for a prototype of an American flying bomb called the JB-2. It is a nearly exact replica of the pulsejet engine which powered the V-1.
I plan to build such an engine myself-valveless...and I had a few ideas of how to improve it!What's do you think about:
1. A ceramic (or asbestos?) coating inside the combustion chamber. It would protect the outer metal shell and it would increase the combustion temperature thus increasing the fuel efficiency and power?
2. A turbo, powered by some exhaust that would in turn send compressed air into the intake?
@pipzipcip2000 1. it really doesn't need it, pulse jetscan't be made fuel eficient. they burn clean, but they burn alot.
2> here you are talking about buildin a turbojet, a very different typ of engine. look them up, search "turbocharger jet engine"
3.linking two engines in a series is not advisable. if you are building aturbojet however, you might use an afturburner, wich is essentially a ramjet engine atatched to the exaust of your turbojet. hoever, these do not work with pulse jets!
I always thought that the pulse jet engine had to be moving forward to operate. Obviously I am mistaken. That had to be a sound to anyone who heard it back in the day, would never forget. One of a kind.
@kolbpilot I believe that the valveless ones require air to be forced into them to run, but the valved ones (like this one) create the air flow by drawing in the air after the valves open following combustion. Closed valves force the expansion of combustion out the open back end and this flow creates a vacuum in the combustion chamber which then opens the valves (like the reeds on a 2 cycle engine do) drawing in air to and fuel starting the cycle over again..
@angusandleigh no, they only use compressed air to start. they all (all pulsejets, anyhow) run on thermodynamic cycles of low-high pressure waves to "breath".
You jumped, ( I would too ) but the axels seemingly didn't budge. Not even a millimeter.
This isn't a challenge- I just want to understand.
cjheaford 4 days ago
Thanks for this!
Physics question:
I don't see that trailer anchored with anything other than a 2x6 at the tires, and the pedestal in front.
What is keeping that engine from shooting the trailer it is secured to into the next zip code?
cjheaford 4 days ago
Yup. And that was me.
futureopression 4 days ago
hahahah scared the shit out of the camera man when it started lol
omgidontknowwtf 4 days ago
Is this how the made the DUN DUN DUN DE DUN DUN for the battlefield theme?
TheBlackBritt 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That is one "industrious" video. =p
ramonshaw921 1 month ago
wish that Verizon dude would stand next to this and say "CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW!!!!"
Flippit1303 1 month ago
I LOVE DUBSTEP
TruEviLuKki 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos 3
What??? Did somebody say something?
engineworksgmbh 2 months ago
Your video is a favorite on Singapore
elvinhickma12k 2 months ago
i heard the fuel efficiency if thats the correct term is in the Gallons Per Second
emforty2 4 months ago
I know this vids audio is distorted, but the weird thing is, thats almost how it was in person. Ever been by something so loud you can't make it out? A concert where the volume is way to high? Same thing. So this is actually a pretty good representation of what it was like being so close to this. At their air show, the sound was very different because of the distance. I hope they demonstrate it again.
futureopression 4 months ago
This is just amazing
supernaturalmc 4 months ago
Sweet! Thanks for posting!
asheguns 5 months ago in playlist asheguns's favorites
Well what do you know it really does make a buzzing noise.
ultrajd 5 months ago
Damn This means Business!!
skyprop 5 months ago
I just sampled 0:03:00 to 0:03:25 and made a hard dance kick out of it
absurdny 6 months ago
The ULTIMATE bass test!
matthewvanh 6 months ago
@matthewvanh thats what i was thinking lol. my subwoofer was goin NUTS
yamahonkawazuki 4 months ago
An artist group out of San Francisco called "Survival research labs" made one of these engines for performances,it's fed air from a car engine driven industrial blower. It was designed to make the maximum amount of noise,and does so with deafening effectiveness! I've seen the windows on downtown buildings shimmering from the low frequency sounds that thing generated. Look it up, it's worth a view!
Oldbmwr100rs 7 months ago
QUEEF!!!
SEANM4444 7 months ago
That was awesome. It must have been what it sounded like.
Too bad it was so loud that the camera audio couldn't recorded it without distortion. It would have been better if it was 100 meters further away.
tracysrocket 8 months ago
I believe that in the 1943-44, if you hear the engine goes at 1:11, the English were not cheering like those who did in the video. That silence would had been deafening.
PorkIsHalal 9 months ago
Thumbs up if you scared the shit when its started.
merdaporrenta 9 months ago
impressive, REALLY impressive.
Got loads of jet related vids on my channel, can you have a look and subscribe please.
There's a small pulsejet on a delta that is flying
ArcturanMegadonkey 11 months ago
now thats bass... fuck the records. Just use this blow out doors, windows. LOL
oddsource 11 months ago
immagine how terrifying those things must have sounded above london in WW2
PitbullNL 11 months ago 24
@PitbullNL V1's were never used in londons attacks...
gokoo123 10 months ago
@gokoo123 You best be trollin'.
DerPanzerjager 10 months ago
@gokoo123 You are wrong.
harley333man 9 months ago
@harley333man are you insane? those things were like nuclear bombs,only a little less strong. you could never carpet bomb with a V1,since its too big for any WW2 plane to carry,and london was ONLY carpet bombed.
gokoo123 9 months ago
@gokoo123 Actually the Luftwaffe began mounting the V1's on their bombers later in the war.
freakfurt 6 months ago
@gokoo123 Once the Germans lost their ground launch facilities they fired V-1s from He-111s over the North Sea. The warhead on a V-1 was around 2,000 pounds far less destructive power than even a tactical nuclear weapon. Had the Germans been able to launch sufficient quantities of V-1s at the same time & get them to their target the effect would have been like carpet bombing. However, V-1s were not a war winning weapon and a great deal of mythology has grown up about their effectiveness.
twobluehorses 6 months ago
@gokoo123 A quick search on google....... "Almost 9,250 V1's were fired against London, but less than 2,500 reached their target. In flight they were almost as vulnerable as their ramps: about 2,000 were destroyed by anti-aircraft gunfire; 2,000 by fighter planes, and almost 300 by barrage balloons."
ledtoetmn 7 months ago
Sounds like my ol' VW before I sold it.
schnitzel2k3 1 year ago 29
those things are crazy ben around when one was fired
doodman123451 1 year ago
How many pounds of thrust would this particular pulse engine have?
st8oftheart 1 year ago
I heard one of these beasts live. The poster is correct. There is no describing the sound. If Hell has a sound, it sounds like this.
bjorn2run 1 year ago
Well it beats these valveless blow lamps !!
Prublixa 1 year ago
no only do they cause a big boom during impact, but it also breaks the eardrums of its enemies along its way !
the Germans were sure smart!
dmnchi 1 year ago
Damn that thing is nasty!
Sidewinder9877 1 year ago
EAR RAPE!!!!
... suppose that could be the same for the allied troops at the time... just before the V1 hits the ground... :| what a way to go
celtic5yamum 1 year ago
Boring, the Germans did this 65 years ago :)
dx80cruiser 1 year ago
Comment removed
dx80cruiser 1 year ago
a little advice to the camera man.
Muffle the camcorders mic with foam or similar.
or
Decrease the input level of the mic if the option is available
ALL WE CAN HEAR IS ABSOLUTE DISTORTION, which is a shame because i would really like to hear the sound characteristics.
ChoonDSW 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Defo not the only one left!!
A small museum near me has a genuine complete piloted V1 that runs!
Thats a wartime V1 btw, the one in the video isn't a genuine German one of course
hetsar 1 year ago
Comment removed
hetsar 1 year ago
is that engine to scale...The Nazi flying buzz bomb...V1?
schicktd 1 year ago
@schicktd
Yes, this engine is to scale. This is an engine made by Ford for a prototype of an American flying bomb called the JB-2. It is a nearly exact replica of the pulsejet engine which powered the V-1.
douro20 1 year ago
@schicktd Engine manufactured by Ford, airframe by Republic. Original V1: Engine by Argus, airframe by Fieseler.
kolbpilot 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hy,
I plan to build such an engine myself-valveless...and I had a few ideas of how to improve it!What's do you think about:
1. A ceramic (or asbestos?) coating inside the combustion chamber. It would protect the outer metal shell and it would increase the combustion temperature thus increasing the fuel efficiency and power?
2. A turbo, powered by some exhaust that would in turn send compressed air into the intake?
3. Linking 2 eng. in a series? exhaust to intake.
Thanx, alex C
pipzipcip2000 1 year ago
@pipzipcip2000 1. it really doesn't need it, pulse jetscan't be made fuel eficient. they burn clean, but they burn alot.
2> here you are talking about buildin a turbojet, a very different typ of engine. look them up, search "turbocharger jet engine"
3.linking two engines in a series is not advisable. if you are building aturbojet however, you might use an afturburner, wich is essentially a ramjet engine atatched to the exaust of your turbojet. hoever, these do not work with pulse jets!
demonofrazgriz333 1 year ago
I always thought that the pulse jet engine had to be moving forward to operate. Obviously I am mistaken. That had to be a sound to anyone who heard it back in the day, would never forget. One of a kind.
kolbpilot 1 year ago
@kolbpilot I believe that the valveless ones require air to be forced into them to run, but the valved ones (like this one) create the air flow by drawing in the air after the valves open following combustion. Closed valves force the expansion of combustion out the open back end and this flow creates a vacuum in the combustion chamber which then opens the valves (like the reeds on a 2 cycle engine do) drawing in air to and fuel starting the cycle over again..
angusandleigh 1 year ago
@angusandleigh no, they only use compressed air to start. they all (all pulsejets, anyhow) run on thermodynamic cycles of low-high pressure waves to "breath".
demonofrazgriz333 1 year ago
@demonofrazgriz333 Thanks for the information, I stand corrected... either way a wild sounding machine :)
angusandleigh 1 year ago
@angusandleigh my pleasure.
demonofrazgriz333 1 year ago
@kolbpilot no, those are ramjets or scramjets, the much simple coousins of the pulsejet.
demonofrazgriz333 1 year ago
Whaha I like the sound of the echo!!
koolpulsejet 1 year ago