Not been rude, but what was the significance to the slow bit, i didn't understand what i was suppose to be looking out for.
Great spot, but i have to agree with railhead, i think a new tri-pod head is in order, i had a £30 tri-pod and upgraded to a £200 one and it's so much better, but i'm sure you can find cheaper one's than that
The 'slow bit' was just to show the engine working in slow motion. Simple. As for all this tripod business - thank you all very much much for your positive comments.
You obviously put a lot of time and effort into your filming. so why spoil it with poor panning,I suggest you get a better tripod head. The slo-mo was better than the normal speed, all in all a good effort
well presented at the start , the smoke above the vegatation is a good idea - but poor panning - needs a wind sock on the mike too.
squeakyadam 3 years ago
Nice one - it's good to see something a bit different.
Linesider1 3 years ago
Not been rude, but what was the significance to the slow bit, i didn't understand what i was suppose to be looking out for.
Great spot, but i have to agree with railhead, i think a new tri-pod head is in order, i had a £30 tri-pod and upgraded to a £200 one and it's so much better, but i'm sure you can find cheaper one's than that
but part from that brilliant work :D
Simon
Teenagetrainphotos 3 years ago
The 'slow bit' was just to show the engine working in slow motion. Simple. As for all this tripod business - thank you all very much much for your positive comments.
FernFilms 3 years ago
You obviously put a lot of time and effort into your filming. so why spoil it with poor panning,I suggest you get a better tripod head. The slo-mo was better than the normal speed, all in all a good effort
railhead 3 years ago