Aren't the days numbered as the US is looking for tender for a new side arm? And how can it a 92 FS as if it's for the US Military it's the M9 why not use the Military designation when you are talking of them being made for the military? Is it true ti won over SIG due to the fact they gave the government a better price?
And I like how they make it seem as if Beretta was American, when it is actually Italian. Beretta USA is just the American headquarters of the Italian company Beretta!
@Th3m4X92 There is a Beretta in Italy, and the Beretta family is indeed italian. However, the M9s are made in America, by Americans. Beretta USA employs hundreds of American workers and pays Federal taxes right here in the USA.
@BerettaCommunity Much agreed, however, the company, even it's american "branch" (Beretta USA), is run by the italian family the owns the whole thing. Indeed Beretta created a Beretta USA to reduce cost of transportation (they wouldnt be able to suppy the whole american military by shipping, they would eventually end up in loss, despite the huge contract they signed with it). Ultimately, it would be unimaginable to see employers in american factiories that are actually not citizens.
@Th3m4X92 Sorry, but that's not accurate. Beretta owns Benelli, which has been successfully importing firearms from Italy to the US and is a major competitor in the firearms market. The decision was not made for savings' sake.
@BerettaCommunity Thanks for the correction: this makes me think that not only did Beretta create the american headquarters of its own company, but it also uses a subsidiary company to ship guns in order to cover as much american gun market (potentially very profitable) as possible. Wow, good job Beretta!
What more can you ask for? I'm pretty sure 9mil was adapted because of other NATO countries using 9mil. The only gripe I can see for Military use is that it isn't light, and most Hand guns are rarely ever used in Combat. But better to have something and not need it than to need something and not have it eh?
I own a former range gun, a Baretta model 96 Centurion, it's 40 cal S&W. They are identical in field stripping. Push a button, rotate a lever, hold your slide and carefully bring it forward. I've never had any issues or the slide coming off in use or otherwise. It's dependable as any gun so long as you use good quality Ammo and and clean your weapon. a/ Reliability***** b/Ease of use (No tools required to field strip)***** c/ Cost to operate ***** This my friends is why they got the contract!
As an additional note, The Air Marshalls post 911 were issued Barettas in 40 cal. S&W. It's a pleasant gun to shoot as is the 92FS. I've shot .45's in the Navy and .45's that were recal'd to .22 down in San Diego when I went through basic. Reasons being is cost and to ease wear and tear on the range. The 1911 was reliable and dependable in it's day. The Barettas are also quite light, every oz of weight counts when your marching along for 30 or 40 miles.
I will start this by stating I have no problem with Beretta at all. They make great firearms. But they only got this contract because the military decided to scrap the search for a new 45 caliber pistol to replace the 9mm. I guess they figured it was just cheaper to stay with what they got. I read that they were leaning towards the HK45 or FNP45. But Glock,Sig,Colt, and S&W all tried out for the 45 contract as well. Just in case nobody new about it!!!
@straywolf5 i love how you say beretta are a POS when they are the oldest gun manufacturer in the world. lol apparently 500 years means nothing to you. ill give you the fact a .45 has more stopping power than a 9mm but if you are a good shot then a 9mm is plenty. a .45 is for lazy marksman. anyway you probably need to get back to playing call of duty or something, just dont stay up too late, you gotta climb back up into your race car bed and get some sleep, big day at school tomorrow.
@TheSTURMGEWEHR44 SERIOUSLY. I love all these idiots who base their knowledge of weaponry off of video games and firearm blogs. Especially the people who always say "how come Glock (or other firearm) isn't the official sidearm of the US military...it's more reliable". Well look at the design and you might just figure out why. Glocks are great but at the end of the day it's JUST a Glock, a beretta on the other hand is literally a work of art in my opinion.
@TheSTURMGEWEHR44 the fact that a gun came from an 500 years old maker doesn't make it automatically perfect... I live in belgium and know some of the reputed FN Herstal workers, aftermarket service and R&D people there, and you'l be surprised by what they say about their own products...
i love 1911's and beretta 92's, but the one thing i dont care for about the 92's is how easy they are to take apart by a enemy, its as simple as grabing the gun, pushing the button, then the barrel pops off.
I lobe the way the gun looks and feels but I've never fired one. I love my beretta shotgun but that obviously has nothing to do with their handguns and my only experience with those is an awful beretta 96 that i couldn't hit shit with but I guess u can't rly compare that with a nine mil
@767Alaa Designed for killing humans that are about to kill you... that doesn't sound that bad does it? Being good doesn't necessary mean being defenseless. Not everyone in the world shares your rare sense of pacifism. I wish they did. :)
Pacifism!!! What the hell are you talking bout? At first their intention of making this gun was to kill innocent iraqi people[they told in the clip, for the US soldiers, ie iraq], then they advertise the product to the public telling it for defense purpose........
The Beretta M92FS is not a bad weapon, it is accurate, easy to handle, and anyone can pick it up and shoot it.
But it is not the best that money can buy. I support the 1911 design and the CZ-75 design. Glocks are good, I like the sight picture they have, but I just want that grip angle closer to the 1911 or Hi-Power.
A Beretta sure is not a bad gun at all - I own a M9A1 myself. But in my opinion it has no chance against a Glock 17 or a Sig P226. And yes, I speak out of experience, I own all of them. Of course just my opinion.
No there not. A beretta is the best pistol on the earth. Not strength wise but as a reliable gun and it does have the strength to take out your target as well.
@foho123 - So, why is the american military carrying Beretta's instead of Glocks? Maybe because they haven't got a clue right? Please....Glocks are all right but, BERETTA is on a league of its own.
@Mamertum345 Because glocks are in general - more expensive. Glocks have also improved alot since the first generation, and they fixed a lot of problems that came up when the military did their first selection for the replacement of the 1911. Law Enforcement agencies around the world has adopted the glock as their prime weapon, including many US police officers. I do like berettas, but you'll have to admit glocks are going to overtake Berettas if they dont improve it soon.
Shootcentermass. The Beretta 92 is the most reliable firearm I've ever owned. I've shot probably around 10K rounds through it. Not a single malfunction. I've shot cheap ammo, steel case ammo, several varitiies of JHP ammo through it. Its fed and shot every single round I've put through it. The firearm is every bit as reliable as any ammo manufacturer. The design had problems initially back in the 1980s which have been fixed. Its probably the most reliable centerfire firearm in existence.
dont lie. there are loads of pistols that would totally RAPE the Berretta 92 FS. now dont get me wrong, the 92 is a great pistol, reliable, accurate. but it really doesnt come close to the M1911, or the FN Five seveN. or the Browning HI-Power. This pistol just breaks too easy. i mean im all for the AR-15, but a pistol is supposed to be the very definition of reliability, something the soldier can depend on no matter what. not this.
@shootcentermass you do realise that a single stack 15 round magazine would be more than double the length of the original M1911 round magazine right? in order to have ANY possibility of decent length with a .45, it HAS to be double stacked. The M1911 is as close as it comes to perfection. it doesnt get any better. I mean it is perfectly useable in a double stacked form, no thicker than this is, but yeah it still is a bit harder to use.
@PrivatePeterson yes the Beretta Family make firearms since 1526, the the Beretta Company was found nearly 500 years ago in the city of Brescia, Italy!
@GARTV101 You really think the united states military is going to change there sidearm that they have used for the last 2 decades because some guy named GARTV101 says bring it back?
@GARTV101 not the gun, but the caliber!45 is heavy and slow and a 45 magazine can't contain 15/16 bullets!! they should built the 1911 in 9mm with double-stack magazine! a single stack mag pistol is obsolete.
@GARTV101 the United States has won the Second World War thanks to rifles and machine guns. But also thanks to the millions of men at his disposal. Luger and walther in 9mm was great guns too.
@GARTV101 9mm and .45 perform about the same in fmj which is all the military uses anyway. On top of that, it's faster, has less recoil, lighter, and cheaper. .45 is great, but the extra firepower isn't worth it in my opinion.
@THX14438 thats one of the original reasons i think they swithched to 9mm,because its cheaper.i love 9mm its got to be one of my favorite rounds,but if you put me in the middle of war i would rather have a .45,but thats just me.
@esh325 Actually, cost did have a bit to do with the selection of the pistol. The Sig Sauer P226 performed better than the 92fs, however, it was much more expensive (that is why the P226 is standard issue to the Navy SEALs). Its not a comfortable thought that our troops get second rate gear based on economics, but frankly, economics are a major part of warfare.
Personally, I hate this weapon. I cannot wait until they let me carry a .45 as my sidearm (USMC- Oorah).
Any of the big name armorers produce quality handguns. SIG, Glock, Beretta, etc. They are all quality manufacturers.
Can't speak to the other couple million Berettas manufactured, but I've never suffered a critical malfunction of my 92FS. Mine works as advertised in temperatures ranging from -20°F to 105°F.
It's a matter of personal preference. I prefer Beretta. Others prefer Glock or SIG or S&W.
Not one mention of Italy? I guess America as usual is always ready to take credit on behalf of others. When I bought my 92FS Inox I specifically got one made in Italy after replacing the following on my U.S. made 92FS - 1 magazine caused untold jams, cracking on the falling block and dodgy misaligned transfer bar. My Italian one is unmodified from factory and works great. Sure I give my pistols a hard time but those peices should have lasted :( I love american guns but the boast is too much
Military contracts always go to the lowest bidder, why you think 20,000 Beretta's are going to Iraq? They going to work out the bugs, using Iraqi's first
The P226 cost less per pistol than the 92F, but SIG's package price with magazines and spare parts was higher than Beretta's. The Navy SEALs, however, chose to adopt the P226 later after a repetition of failures with some issued Beretta M9s.
The P226 was designed for entry into the XM9 Service Pistol Trials, which were held by the US Army in 1984 on behalf of the US armed forces to find a replacement for the M1911A1. Only the Beretta 92F and the SIG P226 satisfactorily completed the trials. According to a GAO report, Beretta was awarded the M9 contract for the 92F due to better durability during endurance testing and a lower total package price.
funny how they emphasize "american" crafmanship when it's clearly italian!! probably will sell better that way if they say american made and american workers..lol
Well jackass...I guess you didn't know about the Beretta plant in Accokeek M.D. You know...the place where ALL U.S. Miliatary handguns are produced by American workers? Tell me you forgot or something? I can live with that.
Our Beretta's are made in the U.S.A. And there are differences between American Berettas and Italy's, aside from the stampings. Also many of the variations made in the U.S are only made in the U.S and the same goes for italian variations.. It is American craftsmanship. Our Berettas are crafted/fabricated by Americans on American soil in an American factory.
So The video claims craftsmanship NOT engineering.
I don't know who the Engineer of the 92 is, I never cared to look it up or I don't recall. Beretta owns the rights to the design but many engingeers all over the world design things and sell their design to the highest biddders. Most auto pistols makers get most if not all of their design ideas from Browning, he was the greatest gun engineer to ever live. He was American, but he sold his designs throughout europe as well as the U.S.A
@PopcornCoolie- Hmm didnt know that. I just thought that it was just from Italy. So is it the same how like for example Glock has a factory in Smyrna,GA but Glock came from Austria?? I still like the M1911...I think they should use that man.
Yup, same deal. AND the 1911 is a great gun. It does prove the original is always best. The 1911 is still in the arsenal and is an optional carry depending on who you are. I'm sure the 92 was chose over the 1911 due to it's safety redundancy. It has so many safety features it's stupid. But the military will give a gun to anyone. So better safe than sorry The 1911 allows easy conceal and carry of multiple 1911's due to it's slim design. So it's also a backup option.
@i7q You are correct sir. But the 8000 wasn't the best thing they came up with. The 92 was hit while the 8000 was a bit of a miss. Especially the 8045. A double stack .45 that only packs one more round than a single stack 1911. The 92 is great but we shouldn't forget the Hi-power and similar were around long before the consideration to adopt the 92 as the uniform sidearm. I guess it was chose for style more than function.OR the bid for the contract was too good to say no. :D
ha! now it's getting replaced
uiiiiop1234 1 week ago
a 9mm to a .45 yea i'll take the M1911.
USSWISCONSIN64 2 weeks ago
I'd rather have a 1911
Alexn1067 2 weeks ago
Aren't the days numbered as the US is looking for tender for a new side arm? And how can it a 92 FS as if it's for the US Military it's the M9 why not use the Military designation when you are talking of them being made for the military? Is it true ti won over SIG due to the fact they gave the government a better price?
NovaScotiaNewfie 2 weeks ago
At 2:31... FN HP!!! That make my day :))))
serbianhero 3 weeks ago
And I like how they make it seem as if Beretta was American, when it is actually Italian. Beretta USA is just the American headquarters of the Italian company Beretta!
Th3m4X92 1 month ago
@Th3m4X92 There is a Beretta in Italy, and the Beretta family is indeed italian. However, the M9s are made in America, by Americans. Beretta USA employs hundreds of American workers and pays Federal taxes right here in the USA.
BerettaCommunity 2 weeks ago
@BerettaCommunity Much agreed, however, the company, even it's american "branch" (Beretta USA), is run by the italian family the owns the whole thing. Indeed Beretta created a Beretta USA to reduce cost of transportation (they wouldnt be able to suppy the whole american military by shipping, they would eventually end up in loss, despite the huge contract they signed with it). Ultimately, it would be unimaginable to see employers in american factiories that are actually not citizens.
Th3m4X92 1 week ago
@Th3m4X92 Sorry, but that's not accurate. Beretta owns Benelli, which has been successfully importing firearms from Italy to the US and is a major competitor in the firearms market. The decision was not made for savings' sake.
BerettaCommunity 1 week ago
@BerettaCommunity Thanks for the correction: this makes me think that not only did Beretta create the american headquarters of its own company, but it also uses a subsidiary company to ship guns in order to cover as much american gun market (potentially very profitable) as possible. Wow, good job Beretta!
Th3m4X92 1 week ago
Go Italiansss!!! Forza Beretta!!! :)
Th3m4X92 1 month ago
Beretta won the race for best gun, that's wy they got the contract.
Capitancanguro1 1 month ago
450' 000 more worthless 9mm pea shooters, O yeah for that lol.
pac6010 1 month ago
Goes bang when you go click.
What more can you ask for? I'm pretty sure 9mil was adapted because of other NATO countries using 9mil. The only gripe I can see for Military use is that it isn't light, and most Hand guns are rarely ever used in Combat. But better to have something and not need it than to need something and not have it eh?
kop4321 1 month ago
I own a former range gun, a Baretta model 96 Centurion, it's 40 cal S&W. They are identical in field stripping. Push a button, rotate a lever, hold your slide and carefully bring it forward. I've never had any issues or the slide coming off in use or otherwise. It's dependable as any gun so long as you use good quality Ammo and and clean your weapon. a/ Reliability***** b/Ease of use (No tools required to field strip)***** c/ Cost to operate ***** This my friends is why they got the contract!
flojogrande 1 month ago
As an additional note, The Air Marshalls post 911 were issued Barettas in 40 cal. S&W. It's a pleasant gun to shoot as is the 92FS. I've shot .45's in the Navy and .45's that were recal'd to .22 down in San Diego when I went through basic. Reasons being is cost and to ease wear and tear on the range. The 1911 was reliable and dependable in it's day. The Barettas are also quite light, every oz of weight counts when your marching along for 30 or 40 miles.
flojogrande 1 month ago
@flojogrande Federal Air Marshals carry Sig P229 in 357 sig not Barrettas
Lord666Belial 1 month ago
I will start this by stating I have no problem with Beretta at all. They make great firearms. But they only got this contract because the military decided to scrap the search for a new 45 caliber pistol to replace the 9mm. I guess they figured it was just cheaper to stay with what they got. I read that they were leaning towards the HK45 or FNP45. But Glock,Sig,Colt, and S&W all tried out for the 45 contract as well. Just in case nobody new about it!!!
HKmanlp1 1 month ago
forza baretta
goonbots 1 month ago
Straywolf5....ok name a better manufacturer?...The only one that compares is smith & wesson.
bmister50 2 months ago
@bmister50 Sig, Glock, FNH, those are just three to start.
Lord666Belial 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here in Brazil, to have any gun is a crime.
daltonagre 2 months ago
berettas are not a good quality pistol when compared to many on the market today! POS
straywolf5 2 months ago
@straywolf5 i love how you say beretta are a POS when they are the oldest gun manufacturer in the world. lol apparently 500 years means nothing to you. ill give you the fact a .45 has more stopping power than a 9mm but if you are a good shot then a 9mm is plenty. a .45 is for lazy marksman. anyway you probably need to get back to playing call of duty or something, just dont stay up too late, you gotta climb back up into your race car bed and get some sleep, big day at school tomorrow.
TheSTURMGEWEHR44 2 months ago 7
@TheSTURMGEWEHR44 SERIOUSLY. I love all these idiots who base their knowledge of weaponry off of video games and firearm blogs. Especially the people who always say "how come Glock (or other firearm) isn't the official sidearm of the US military...it's more reliable". Well look at the design and you might just figure out why. Glocks are great but at the end of the day it's JUST a Glock, a beretta on the other hand is literally a work of art in my opinion.
Robertjcksn40 1 month ago
@TheSTURMGEWEHR44 the fact that a gun came from an 500 years old maker doesn't make it automatically perfect... I live in belgium and know some of the reputed FN Herstal workers, aftermarket service and R&D people there, and you'l be surprised by what they say about their own products...
serbianhero 3 weeks ago
does the army even use their beretta? i only see us forces clearing the ground with their assault rifles. never saw a soldier firing his beretta!
ploetzlich30 2 months ago
nice gun im buying one but we need the 1911 back in our military
patriotcam1776 2 months ago
What Model and type of m9 does the marine corps use?
Ascenscion123 3 months ago
@Ascenscion123 M9A1
BerettaCommunity 3 months ago 2
@BerettaCommunity thanks
Ascenscion123 3 months ago
i love 1911's and beretta 92's, but the one thing i dont care for about the 92's is how easy they are to take apart by a enemy, its as simple as grabing the gun, pushing the button, then the barrel pops off.
cooey84 3 months ago
@cooey84 if they get close enough to do that, your doing something wrong
agricola 3 months ago
IS Beretta Italian ?
davixx234 3 months ago
92fs racks smoother than any other gun ive fired. too bad its a tad big for CCW
agricola 4 months ago
It looks cool but they should have kept the m1911a2
EmanGtown 4 months ago
I lobe the way the gun looks and feels but I've never fired one. I love my beretta shotgun but that obviously has nothing to do with their handguns and my only experience with those is an awful beretta 96 that i couldn't hit shit with but I guess u can't rly compare that with a nine mil
angryasian2 4 months ago
0:16 bundeswehr?
AtomPilsener 4 months ago
This weapon is especially designed for killing humans!!! therefore I hit the dislike button!!!!!!
767Alaa 4 months ago
@767Alaa Designed for killing humans that are about to kill you... that doesn't sound that bad does it? Being good doesn't necessary mean being defenseless. Not everyone in the world shares your rare sense of pacifism. I wish they did. :)
StriderCX 4 months ago
Comment removed
767Alaa 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pacifism!!! What the hell are you talking bout? At first their intention of making this gun was to kill innocent iraqi people[they told in the clip, for the US soldiers, ie iraq], then they advertise the product to the public telling it for defense purpose........
767Alaa 4 months ago
not only did the 92fs pass, so did the sig p226, but the reason why they dont use sig is the fact that it cost much more. sigs are amazing.
Grawr93XD 4 months ago
The Beretta M92FS is not a bad weapon, it is accurate, easy to handle, and anyone can pick it up and shoot it.
But it is not the best that money can buy. I support the 1911 design and the CZ-75 design. Glocks are good, I like the sight picture they have, but I just want that grip angle closer to the 1911 or Hi-Power.
Reynard13Fuchs 5 months ago
troops don't like this rig.
semiautoriflelover1 5 months ago
This commercial... So american....
NorHuxy 5 months ago
A Beretta sure is not a bad gun at all - I own a M9A1 myself. But in my opinion it has no chance against a Glock 17 or a Sig P226. And yes, I speak out of experience, I own all of them. Of course just my opinion.
schubidubap 5 months ago
glock is a tad more reliable on the whole. i wouldnt feel undergunned with a 92fs, but their grips are alittle big for my hands......
twinpeninsulas 6 months ago
My two cents in the M9 review n shooting of this gun, here in my channel hd closeup
revistadearmas 7 months ago
i like how they say by the U.S ARMY at 0:19 and yet they show a U.S MARINE
GinJewVitus 7 months ago 6
No there not. A beretta is the best pistol on the earth. Not strength wise but as a reliable gun and it does have the strength to take out your target as well.
1989CAPRICECHEVY 8 months ago
glocks are better
foho123 8 months ago
@foho123 - So, why is the american military carrying Beretta's instead of Glocks? Maybe because they haven't got a clue right? Please....Glocks are all right but, BERETTA is on a league of its own.
Mamertum345 6 months ago
@Mamertum345 Because glocks are in general - more expensive. Glocks have also improved alot since the first generation, and they fixed a lot of problems that came up when the military did their first selection for the replacement of the 1911. Law Enforcement agencies around the world has adopted the glock as their prime weapon, including many US police officers. I do like berettas, but you'll have to admit glocks are going to overtake Berettas if they dont improve it soon.
foho123 6 months ago
@foho123 Actually the glocks are cheaper.
semiautoriflelover1 5 months ago
Shootcentermass. The Beretta 92 is the most reliable firearm I've ever owned. I've shot probably around 10K rounds through it. Not a single malfunction. I've shot cheap ammo, steel case ammo, several varitiies of JHP ammo through it. Its fed and shot every single round I've put through it. The firearm is every bit as reliable as any ammo manufacturer. The design had problems initially back in the 1980s which have been fixed. Its probably the most reliable centerfire firearm in existence.
strat1080 8 months ago
dont lie. there are loads of pistols that would totally RAPE the Berretta 92 FS. now dont get me wrong, the 92 is a great pistol, reliable, accurate. but it really doesnt come close to the M1911, or the FN Five seveN. or the Browning HI-Power. This pistol just breaks too easy. i mean im all for the AR-15, but a pistol is supposed to be the very definition of reliability, something the soldier can depend on no matter what. not this.
anduril37 10 months ago
@anduril37 "AR-15?!?!" And you're complaining about durability? Your comment is redundant.
TheMegazapcat 8 months ago
@shootcentermass you do realise that a single stack 15 round magazine would be more than double the length of the original M1911 round magazine right? in order to have ANY possibility of decent length with a .45, it HAS to be double stacked. The M1911 is as close as it comes to perfection. it doesnt get any better. I mean it is perfectly useable in a double stacked form, no thicker than this is, but yeah it still is a bit harder to use.
anduril37 10 months ago
@anduril37 ever seen para-ordinance hi cap mags? 1/8" wider, not "twice as long as 1911's mag"
thatpunkwelder 9 months ago
@shootcentermass i agree with that i wrote that comment 6 months ago
GARTV101 10 months ago
0:19 I love how they say U.S. Army while showing a picture of a Marine
FlyboyPiper 10 months ago
@FlyboyPiper nobody GAF dumbshit, its a picture -____-
Robbieifyoucan 10 months ago
Comment removed
FlyboyPiper 10 months ago
Ok voce venceu!
Mas o 45 e a 1911 são eternos.
PertigueiroBR 1 year ago
500 years!?!?!
PrivatePeterson 1 year ago
@PrivatePeterson yes the Beretta Family make firearms since 1526, the the Beretta Company was found nearly 500 years ago in the city of Brescia, Italy!
johnny1793 1 year ago
I rely on the 1911
atomman45 1 year ago
i dont do drugs, but this makes me high
dakanister23 1 year ago
keeping the peace in Bosnia-otkad to?
lunatiy 1 year ago
i want one sexy pistols
cowhurter 1 year ago
$488.89 per pistol why can't civilians buy it at that price. All my local guns shops charges around $650 per pistol.
5687678 1 year ago
They should make one in .45acp I would probably really buy one then!!!
pancho0022 1 year ago 2
@pancho0022 there are beretta caliber variants, they are very nice pistols either way
gunny9098 1 year ago
@gunny9098 Yea I know but I mean the 92 fs, but regardless they are nice.
pancho0022 1 year ago
BRING BACK THE .45 1911,PLEASE
GARTV101 1 year ago 43
@GARTV101 You really think the united states military is going to change there sidearm that they have used for the last 2 decades because some guy named GARTV101 says bring it back?
Good luck with that...
and who were you expecting a response from?
BosomyDefused 1 year ago
@BosomyDefused yep i was expecting a response from the military .
...fuckin dumbass
GARTV101 1 year ago
@GARTV101 BRING BACK THE MUZZLE LOADING GUN OR WHY NOT THE MEDIEVAL LONGBOW!!hahahaha
ciaociao381 11 months ago
@ciaociao381 are you saying the 1911 is outdated
GARTV101 11 months ago
@GARTV101 not the gun, but the caliber!45 is heavy and slow and a 45 magazine can't contain 15/16 bullets!! they should built the 1911 in 9mm with double-stack magazine! a single stack mag pistol is obsolete.
ciaociao381 11 months ago
@ciaociao381 the 1911 is a great design and the .45 is a great round ,slinging a big slug.it helped win ww2
GARTV101 11 months ago
@GARTV101 the United States has won the Second World War thanks to rifles and machine guns. But also thanks to the millions of men at his disposal. Luger and walther in 9mm was great guns too.
ciaociao381 11 months ago
@GARTV101 9mm and .45 perform about the same in fmj which is all the military uses anyway. On top of that, it's faster, has less recoil, lighter, and cheaper. .45 is great, but the extra firepower isn't worth it in my opinion.
THX14438 11 months ago
@THX14438 thats one of the original reasons i think they swithched to 9mm,because its cheaper.i love 9mm its got to be one of my favorite rounds,but if you put me in the middle of war i would rather have a .45,but thats just me.
GARTV101 11 months ago
@GARTV101 I don't really think cost had anything to do with it. NATO standardization was really more of a factor.
esh325 11 months ago
@esh325 Actually, cost did have a bit to do with the selection of the pistol. The Sig Sauer P226 performed better than the 92fs, however, it was much more expensive (that is why the P226 is standard issue to the Navy SEALs). Its not a comfortable thought that our troops get second rate gear based on economics, but frankly, economics are a major part of warfare.
Personally, I hate this weapon. I cannot wait until they let me carry a .45 as my sidearm (USMC- Oorah).
clt19111 11 months ago
@clt19111 I haven't fired the Beretta but I have fired the Sig. Not to be a knob, but where is the data indicating Sig out performed the 92fs?
Thanks, and I agree, I like my .45 as well.
commonsense369 7 months ago
@GARTV101- I would have to agree. Plus the M1911 is american made by an american!!! Beretta is from Italy.
KING5TORM1418 11 months ago
@KING5TORM1418 Uck American....
TheMegazapcat 8 months ago
@TheMegazapcat uck american? what exactly do you mean by that?
twinpeninsulas 6 months ago
@GARTV101 Or remake it into a better gun, the looks of the gun is awesome
lillskiten1337 10 months ago
@GARTV101 P226!
NallePu83 6 months ago
@GoldenRing1989 aw shit soz nvm, read your comment wrong lol
supernaturalguru 1 year ago
@GoldenRing1989 220 mil, divided by 450k is 488 dollars per pistol lol
so yeah they`re getting charged the same.
supernaturalguru 1 year ago
Any of the big name armorers produce quality handguns. SIG, Glock, Beretta, etc. They are all quality manufacturers.
Can't speak to the other couple million Berettas manufactured, but I've never suffered a critical malfunction of my 92FS. Mine works as advertised in temperatures ranging from -20°F to 105°F.
It's a matter of personal preference. I prefer Beretta. Others prefer Glock or SIG or S&W.
Go with what works for you.
DragunovJ 1 year ago
Sorry i just looked at Popcorns post, never mind :P.
OORah4life 1 year ago
Should have went with colt.
OORah4life 1 year ago
Not one mention of Italy? I guess America as usual is always ready to take credit on behalf of others. When I bought my 92FS Inox I specifically got one made in Italy after replacing the following on my U.S. made 92FS - 1 magazine caused untold jams, cracking on the falling block and dodgy misaligned transfer bar. My Italian one is unmodified from factory and works great. Sure I give my pistols a hard time but those peices should have lasted :( I love american guns but the boast is too much
LukeColt 1 year ago 2
Military contracts always go to the lowest bidder, why you think 20,000 Beretta's are going to Iraq? They going to work out the bugs, using Iraqi's first
raypsi 1 year ago
But it's still Italian, sad.
5687678 1 year ago
The P226 cost less per pistol than the 92F, but SIG's package price with magazines and spare parts was higher than Beretta's. The Navy SEALs, however, chose to adopt the P226 later after a repetition of failures with some issued Beretta M9s.
NallePu83 2 years ago
The P226 was designed for entry into the XM9 Service Pistol Trials, which were held by the US Army in 1984 on behalf of the US armed forces to find a replacement for the M1911A1. Only the Beretta 92F and the SIG P226 satisfactorily completed the trials. According to a GAO report, Beretta was awarded the M9 contract for the 92F due to better durability during endurance testing and a lower total package price.
NallePu83 2 years ago
funny how they emphasize "american" crafmanship when it's clearly italian!! probably will sell better that way if they say american made and american workers..lol
56bloodhorn 2 years ago
Well jackass...I guess you didn't know about the Beretta plant in Accokeek M.D. You know...the place where ALL U.S. Miliatary handguns are produced by American workers? Tell me you forgot or something? I can live with that.
maskedman1980 2 years ago
Our Beretta's are made in the U.S.A. And there are differences between American Berettas and Italy's, aside from the stampings. Also many of the variations made in the U.S are only made in the U.S and the same goes for italian variations.. It is American craftsmanship. Our Berettas are crafted/fabricated by Americans on American soil in an American factory.
PopcornCoolie 2 years ago 19
But it is still an Italian gun.
Kurac80 2 years ago
So The video claims craftsmanship NOT engineering.
I don't know who the Engineer of the 92 is, I never cared to look it up or I don't recall. Beretta owns the rights to the design but many engingeers all over the world design things and sell their design to the highest biddders. Most auto pistols makers get most if not all of their design ideas from Browning, he was the greatest gun engineer to ever live. He was American, but he sold his designs throughout europe as well as the U.S.A
PopcornCoolie 2 years ago
@PopcornCoolie- Hmm didnt know that. I just thought that it was just from Italy. So is it the same how like for example Glock has a factory in Smyrna,GA but Glock came from Austria?? I still like the M1911...I think they should use that man.
KING5TORM1418 11 months ago
@KING5TORM1418
Yup, same deal. AND the 1911 is a great gun. It does prove the original is always best. The 1911 is still in the arsenal and is an optional carry depending on who you are. I'm sure the 92 was chose over the 1911 due to it's safety redundancy. It has so many safety features it's stupid. But the military will give a gun to anyone. So better safe than sorry The 1911 allows easy conceal and carry of multiple 1911's due to it's slim design. So it's also a backup option.
PopcornCoolie 11 months ago
@PopcornCoolie ...All thanks to an Italian company, which is 500 (5-0-0) years old :)
matteoprez 4 months ago
well, these berettas are manufactured in maryland.
italian design, american craftsmanship- the perfect combination
i7q 2 years ago
@i7q You are correct sir. But the 8000 wasn't the best thing they came up with. The 92 was hit while the 8000 was a bit of a miss. Especially the 8045. A double stack .45 that only packs one more round than a single stack 1911. The 92 is great but we shouldn't forget the Hi-power and similar were around long before the consideration to adopt the 92 as the uniform sidearm. I guess it was chose for style more than function.OR the bid for the contract was too good to say no. :D
PopcornCoolie 4 months ago
it started in Italy but it is based in many country's. the u.s Beretta made the M9. its the same with H&K
SkullKing11841 2 years ago
and sig sauer
swissfa18 2 years ago
CHAVEZ DEVUELVE LA SENAL A RCTV
SAMMYMAN7777777 2 years ago