these are the rudest questioners of chomsky on youtube. it is clear they just want a punchy quote so they can write 'chomsky condemns hizbullah' in their rags the next day.
hm, didn't Israel enter Lebanon because they were attacked by rockets or so from Lebanon? why should Lebanon have a "deterrent" against Israeli invasion when they themselves were the very reason that Israel entered in the first place?! Israel entered in the 70's, not right after 1948. I like Chomsky always, but I disagree here...
@ahmed337799 he talked about Lebanon I think(forgot because it was some days since I wrote this). and Israel was attacked by Hezbollah I believe for a long time, but I don't remember in what form they were attacked prior to entering Lebanon, but I think it was some kind of rocket back then too(not only from Gaza after 2001).
@ahmed337799 hezbolla is a result of the natural human reaction from population that's been shamefully brutalized by the very people that are exponents of democracy
i wish more people think like you. these days it is impossible to be palestinian lebanese or similar without being influenced by radicalism because of the humiliation we suffer.
thank God for the revolution in tunisia, people are now using their anger and shame on productive goals.
"You wanna concentrate on some minor footnote in the whole story, and I suggest that we look at the whole story. Okay... turning to your minor footnote..."
What a douche. You, Mr. Reporter, are a minor footnote in the brilliance of his thought. Keep your mouth shut next time. You should stick to arguing with someone of your own intellectual ability...
@MrHowToDoIt Well that is a good sugestion. Chomsky responds to dum propagandistic manipulative questions the way they should. Otherwise you let the journalist control the discussion.
rofl. what an amaizng amount of propaganda we're confronted with. this guy's (the journalist asking the question) busy complaining about what ahmadinejad said about israel, quoting khomeini essentially. meanwhile israel is busy occupying/killing/raiding and stealing other peoples land by the day with U.S. support right in front of our eyes. what poor credulous fools we are.
I love the way the reporter through ALL his education tried to bring the cHom down to his own level of mediocraty.. only to be owned 100% by a different & tottaly rational and progressive train of thought...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wrong again about israel/palestine-ck it out!
the gaz has always been a desert-what an azz!
hezbollah/hamas is islam/mulim and funded by iran- this guy is so naive, its laughable-he is so anti- american, -israel, -democracy, -republic, -freedom--it is unbelievable that anyone would listen to this guy in seriousn thought. he is an egghead socialist/utopian/naive-it boggles the mind to think who would want to hear what he says!
TY for your comment I obviously attacked his ideas- i didn't say he is ugly, wears glasses, wears a tweed jacket, combs his hair on the left, etc therefore he thinks this way- it is so obvious he hates all the written above it seems the liberals who defend him only attack with no argument, personal attacks, "big" words, and no thought. Thanks for the ad hominem attack on me if you wish to discuss the issue post a better, more concise thoughtful comment otherwise keep your attacks to yourself
Your attack on his ideas is my point... attacks should be supplemented with evidence or logic. You just made idiotic, empty statements of slander against Chomsky. I presume you misunderstand "ad hominem". Please lrn2wikipedia.
More pertinently, what is your point in alluding to funding? Israel is funded by the US...
The point is in Iranian-American relations, the United States is the belligerent, bellicose, antagonist, whilst Iran is the victim.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Have u watched hisother videos? thisguy cant geta fact right middleeast, globalwarming, iraq, iran israel, bush/cheney et al, --he is wrong onall of them btw "slander" is using the spokenword the correct word is libel--wiki it urself thisforum donot lend itself to listing all the actualfacts, mystatements clearly say to ckitout 4 urself funding -r u high? hez/hamas r funded by iran-did i stutter? the us hasgiven $ tomany countries Iran- a victim? readthe history "whilst"? wiki+pretentious!
well in fact Iran is the victim, the united states supported an Iranian dictatorship, after their democratically elected PM decided to nationalize their oil industries, the Iranian people discovered the power of religion to finally overthrow this dictatorship, which created such a support for theocracy in Iran look up operation ajax
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
sure, good point- its only 50 years ago- i certainly dont believe everything the US gov does is good- actually i dont like much of what it does- but that does not take away from the fact that this guy cant get facts right at all
So true - its like he's got five or six or ways to bitch slap someone and he tries to articulate them all at once.... He finally resigns himself to one response and destroys opposition.
Good call, though. "Completely demolished," indeed.
Check out his interview w/ Evan Solomon on CBC right after 9/11 - it reinforces your observation.
He is a great man. And hopefully one day we can understand the whole picture and that International Law exercises it's power to curb foreign invaders and the plummeting of the worlds resources.
Noam slapped the shit out of those two reporters. Seriously, most of the "educated" college people can be the dumbest ever and it reflects in the media.
Great shit Noam. Now it's up to us to create a more democratic society.
International law only applies to war losers and weak states like Serbia. It shouldnt apply to powerful states that use aggressive war to privatize oil fields in the middle east after falling out with dictators they supplanted in power. What is the world turning to when Arabs start believing they should control their own oil or Palestinians start thinking they have human rights. Human rights are for those with advanced military forces that can define law and enforce it at their own behest.
Isn't that true of all legal forms? The point of the UN charter etc. is to "self-grant" and "self-enforce" human rights, checks on aggression, and so on, among the member states.
Of course out of the crooked timber of humanity nothing straight was ever made. And might makes right. Until it doesn't.
one last time, this is what it is.. No concept can be applied universally, there are no general principles, all ideals fail the crucial test of application. I see zero point in int'l law apart from a hollow idealistic framwork for western liberals to lecture third world countries about, failing to apologise for not recognising those same human rights while they were rapaciously colonising and pillaging those same nations. Morality is artificial, corrupt and blasphemous my friend
you have to admire the man. At his age going through something like this, most would've called it quits long time ago. He still have that fighting spirit. I only wish i could be as passionated about something as he his :)
CIA is the best funded terrorist organization in the world..
Hezbollah is more like freedom fighters who use terrorist tactics
out of desperation.. Theyre religious nuts imo.. but so are the
Israeli settlers.
jsgdk 1 month ago
these are the rudest questioners of chomsky on youtube. it is clear they just want a punchy quote so they can write 'chomsky condemns hizbullah' in their rags the next day.
s0673451 5 months ago
hm, didn't Israel enter Lebanon because they were attacked by rockets or so from Lebanon? why should Lebanon have a "deterrent" against Israeli invasion when they themselves were the very reason that Israel entered in the first place?! Israel entered in the 70's, not right after 1948. I like Chomsky always, but I disagree here...
USAneedsaChange 10 months ago
Israel was not attacked by rockets in the 1970s, they didn't have any. he's talking about NOW, not the 70s.
ahmed337799 10 months ago
@ahmed337799 he talked about Lebanon I think(forgot because it was some days since I wrote this). and Israel was attacked by Hezbollah I believe for a long time, but I don't remember in what form they were attacked prior to entering Lebanon, but I think it was some kind of rocket back then too(not only from Gaza after 2001).
USAneedsaChange 10 months ago
@USAneedsaChange
hezbolla didn't exist before israel went in lebanon
ahmed337799 10 months ago
@ahmed337799 hezbolla is a result of the natural human reaction from population that's been shamefully brutalized by the very people that are exponents of democracy
bilfo71 9 months ago 3
@bilfo71
i wish more people think like you. these days it is impossible to be palestinian lebanese or similar without being influenced by radicalism because of the humiliation we suffer.
thank God for the revolution in tunisia, people are now using their anger and shame on productive goals.
ahmed337799 9 months ago
One of the last scientists whos knows how to school journalists instead of kissing theis asses.
tuxedo55 11 months ago
This video: 17.000 views
Video named "3 Year old crying over Justin Bieber": 21.000.000 views
Need i say more about this world?
tuxedo55 11 months ago 4
Minor footnote: Watch 5:30 to see Chomsky getting angry.
Ah4b 1 year ago
@Ah4b ha ha he OWNED the questioner - and yes, Chomsky, a supremely calm person does get a little angry because someone is trying to railroad him.
sunshineuklondon1965 11 months ago
wow that dude got PWNED
MrLamotta86 1 year ago 2
noamslap, anyone? hmm, not sure if it'll catch on
towneslives 1 year ago
Noam is a B E A S T.
annyms21 1 year ago
Chomsky you little beauty!!!
"You wanna concentrate on some minor footnote in the whole story, and I suggest that we look at the whole story. Okay... turning to your minor footnote..."
What a douche. You, Mr. Reporter, are a minor footnote in the brilliance of his thought. Keep your mouth shut next time. You should stick to arguing with someone of your own intellectual ability...
Nim Chimpsky perhaps...
MrHowToDoIt 1 year ago 2
@MrHowToDoIt Well that is a good sugestion. Chomsky responds to dum propagandistic manipulative questions the way they should. Otherwise you let the journalist control the discussion.
surlagachette2 1 year ago
@Badwolf182 Amen...it's scary sometimes how smart he is...I want him to live forever...
davehutchinson67 1 year ago 2
He fucking killed that power slave journalist! You don't mess with Chomsky!
WastedTourist 1 year ago 5
rofl. what an amaizng amount of propaganda we're confronted with. this guy's (the journalist asking the question) busy complaining about what ahmadinejad said about israel, quoting khomeini essentially. meanwhile israel is busy occupying/killing/raiding and stealing other peoples land by the day with U.S. support right in front of our eyes. what poor credulous fools we are.
darin2483 1 year ago 2
fantastic upload chomskyan
davef89 1 year ago
Thank you. Damnit! we need more people studying the facts like Chomsky, we are all capable of this type of analysis.
radjabov44 2 years ago 7
@radjabov44 exactly
mcshobe2008 1 year ago
If I may say so, he got fucking pwned
adeadlysniper 2 years ago 3
love this
mjd1982 2 years ago
I love the way the reporter through ALL his education tried to bring the cHom down to his own level of mediocraty.. only to be owned 100% by a different & tottaly rational and progressive train of thought...
take that & stick it in your goal mr toolman
saxengee 2 years ago 8
Mr. Reporter, consider yourself owned. heh.
sirMusicboy 2 years ago 10
It's always so enjoyable to hear him speak. Such a contrast to politicians who evade answering anything directly or giving any evidnece.
adcashmo 2 years ago 6
"Such a contrast to politicians who evade answering anything directly or giving any evidnece."
Ah! that is exactly what I thought, too. I am with you on that one, bro.
elguanteloko 2 years ago 6
And that people is the difference between talking points and education...
JSparkleZ2 2 years ago
Excellent!
KapitanHaddock 2 years ago 7
haha yeah that was a basic international affairs lesson to some jumped up hack there, real pleasure to watch.
take that established order of things!!
djboony 2 years ago 6
He just SCHOOLED that journalist as to which entities are subject to international laws...
I would have committed hara-kiri had I been in that poor guy'S shoes...
Pistolero24 2 years ago 10
haha LOL
HRINGNUN 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wrong again about israel/palestine-ck it out!
the gaz has always been a desert-what an azz!
hezbollah/hamas is islam/mulim and funded by iran- this guy is so naive, its laughable-he is so anti- american, -israel, -democracy, -republic, -freedom--it is unbelievable that anyone would listen to this guy in seriousn thought. he is an egghead socialist/utopian/naive-it boggles the mind to think who would want to hear what he says!
docfin63 2 years ago
For the weak minded, ad hominems supersede arguments. Thanks for the vacuous rhetoric...
mdoob11 2 years ago
TY for your comment I obviously attacked his ideas- i didn't say he is ugly, wears glasses, wears a tweed jacket, combs his hair on the left, etc therefore he thinks this way- it is so obvious he hates all the written above it seems the liberals who defend him only attack with no argument, personal attacks, "big" words, and no thought. Thanks for the ad hominem attack on me if you wish to discuss the issue post a better, more concise thoughtful comment otherwise keep your attacks to yourself
docfin63 2 years ago
Your attack on his ideas is my point... attacks should be supplemented with evidence or logic. You just made idiotic, empty statements of slander against Chomsky. I presume you misunderstand "ad hominem". Please lrn2wikipedia.
More pertinently, what is your point in alluding to funding? Israel is funded by the US...
The point is in Iranian-American relations, the United States is the belligerent, bellicose, antagonist, whilst Iran is the victim.
mdoob11 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Have u watched hisother videos? thisguy cant geta fact right middleeast, globalwarming, iraq, iran israel, bush/cheney et al, --he is wrong onall of them btw "slander" is using the spokenword the correct word is libel--wiki it urself thisforum donot lend itself to listing all the actualfacts, mystatements clearly say to ckitout 4 urself funding -r u high? hez/hamas r funded by iran-did i stutter? the us hasgiven $ tomany countries Iran- a victim? readthe history "whilst"? wiki+pretentious!
docfin63 2 years ago
well in fact Iran is the victim, the united states supported an Iranian dictatorship, after their democratically elected PM decided to nationalize their oil industries, the Iranian people discovered the power of religion to finally overthrow this dictatorship, which created such a support for theocracy in Iran look up operation ajax
kazakstanr00lz 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
sure, good point- its only 50 years ago- i certainly dont believe everything the US gov does is good- actually i dont like much of what it does- but that does not take away from the fact that this guy cant get facts right at all
docfin63 2 years ago
Like what?
Redcarpet01 2 years ago
What facts do Chomsky get wrong?
passenger9411 2 years ago
LoL you can tell he gets pissed off when his voice starts to shake. Then you know someone is about to get completely demolished.
Ullbritt 2 years ago 11
So true - its like he's got five or six or ways to bitch slap someone and he tries to articulate them all at once.... He finally resigns himself to one response and destroys opposition.
Good call, though. "Completely demolished," indeed.
Check out his interview w/ Evan Solomon on CBC right after 9/11 - it reinforces your observation.
godw1thin 2 years ago 3
"And I'm sure you didn't care about it..." Check and mate.
I don't think I've ever seen a reporter or questioner challenge Noam and not get his or her ass handed back to them in a high hat.
godw1thin 3 years ago 21
"... and if you did, let me know"
damage9000 3 years ago 9
haha so true
Ullbritt 2 years ago 4
LOL good one.
alwayswilling1232000 2 years ago
chomsky-5; peons-0
rsuthe00 3 years ago 4
lol peons :P I love that word
Ullbritt 2 years ago
He is a great man. And hopefully one day we can understand the whole picture and that International Law exercises it's power to curb foreign invaders and the plummeting of the worlds resources.
louie22pr 3 years ago
Noam slapped the shit out of those two reporters. Seriously, most of the "educated" college people can be the dumbest ever and it reflects in the media.
Great shit Noam. Now it's up to us to create a more democratic society.
bootleg42 3 years ago 11
all though i agree on the face of it, he sure as hell seemed to slap them silly.
but dont forget that as a group reporters aren't all stupid or all intelligent.
you could also ponder if they asked those questions as a devil's advocate to get him to talk about these issues.
in hope of having the other reported, report what he says as a result of said question.
but i doubt this is the case here though :)
beebobox 3 years ago 2
in the knoam.
cradrum 3 years ago 3
I love Noam.
antoniorossiz 3 years ago 4
Chomsky must feel that everyone around him is so dumb. These reporters are so biased and ignorant.
Chomsky is the man
mouf21 3 years ago 5
Reporters are biased but not dumb. They have a mission, as NC has pointed out, to follow the policy of the powerful states.
stirrrrrr 3 years ago 3
Asking a dumb question to smart man is the best way to get a thorough explanatory response.
guessone 3 years ago 5
uh, I love this man
Nightversionn 3 years ago 4
The questioners are very rude! and i feel like they want him to say that what they think is correct!
I feel bad cuz, men like him, should be given a little more dignity and respect when addressed.
Takillah 3 years ago 3
SMACKED DOWN by Chomsky!!
icedoutstreetgangsta 3 years ago 7
chomsky is at his best when he's schooling some retard journalist
tooyjfwn 3 years ago 69
I enjoy when people try to argue with Noam....it's funny...
jeffsensei 4 years ago 60
@jeffsensei Yes, it's like watching balloons attack a cactus.
polymath7 1 year ago 6
@polymath7
Nice videos on your profile man.
Just watching a couple Pinker and Weinberg vids I haven't seen yet.
MrHowToDoIt 1 year ago
The coxcombical jackanapes at the front suffered a trouncing from Chomsky.
NuevoNumeroNueve 4 years ago 5
"The coxcombical jackanapes at the front suffered a trouncing from Chomsky."
Lol, too true. Idiotic journalists demand to be humiliated.
MshrF 3 years ago 2
SERIOUSLY that guy went quiet. what a fucker. i wonder who the guy is, imma kick him in the chin.
boing3887 4 years ago 9
"or like the united states, and britain... radically violate international law" oooo smack down biotch. go noam go!!
mykalwhite1 4 years ago 12
05:30-06:01 tells us alot about the world.
Noam serving that ignorant journalist made my day.
donttrustany1 4 years ago 10
Mine too.
kabbinet 4 years ago
indeed :)
tokotokotoko3 3 years ago
great upload
salim201 4 years ago 4
Does that guy flip him the bird at 3:38/3:39?
NathanZackery 4 years ago
he is america's greatest intellectual. i heart noam.
historywillabsolve 4 years ago 6
International law only applies to war losers and weak states like Serbia. It shouldnt apply to powerful states that use aggressive war to privatize oil fields in the middle east after falling out with dictators they supplanted in power. What is the world turning to when Arabs start believing they should control their own oil or Palestinians start thinking they have human rights. Human rights are for those with advanced military forces that can define law and enforce it at their own behest.
layishevik 4 years ago 3
agreed, except 'human rights' is an artificial concept, can only be self-granted and self-enforced
salim201 4 years ago
Isn't that true of all legal forms? The point of the UN charter etc. is to "self-grant" and "self-enforce" human rights, checks on aggression, and so on, among the member states.
Of course out of the crooked timber of humanity nothing straight was ever made. And might makes right. Until it doesn't.
Si se puede, amigos.
internationallawman 4 years ago
All concepts are artificial.
However for a concept to applied universally we must adhere to definition.
Psycarne 3 years ago
one last time, this is what it is.. No concept can be applied universally, there are no general principles, all ideals fail the crucial test of application. I see zero point in int'l law apart from a hollow idealistic framwork for western liberals to lecture third world countries about, failing to apologise for not recognising those same human rights while they were rapaciously colonising and pillaging those same nations. Morality is artificial, corrupt and blasphemous my friend
salim201 3 years ago
I wish I had the work ethic like Chomsky..
modernmariorc 4 years ago 11
then adopt it!
Alexopolux 4 years ago 3
we need more people like him because he will be dead soon I guess :(
Ullbritt 2 years ago
Gotta love how Chomsky calls out the reporter as a tool of powerful nations, LOL
slurppypurr 4 years ago 9
you have to admire the man. At his age going through something like this, most would've called it quits long time ago. He still have that fighting spirit. I only wish i could be as passionated about something as he his :)
Thanks for uploading these Chomskyan.
silversalvo 4 years ago 10