does the original film look like this? because it seems to me that the frames per second of the film/projection and the digital camera are not the same...?
It was part of a wider art movement that saw destruction as an important part of creativity than previously considered. Wolf Vostell was a German artist and one of the key figures in the dias (destruction in art) movement with his form of the idea called de/collage On it's own this film would not mean that much to any unknowing viewer (other than perhaps that it was somewhat like abstract painting using the tv screen) but once looked at in this wider picture of deconstruction and dismantling
As a Vj I have been hugly influeneced by Wolf ,Paik, Brakhage But this video is absolutely a momentous work for me. I remember seeing it at film school and seeing it here reminds me of how It made me feel, liberated. please check my video response
im digging this video! my names Elizabeth, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ PLAY-CAM...dot...COM __ my user ID there is Elizabeth_epxxqj chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah
Vostell reverts to the effect of early TV transmission test pictures from the 30's where electronic synchronisation was a major task. Later, technological progress presented the brains smoother imagery which made it easier to find sense/interpretation'. This video shows imagery with large holes in-between, the brain has to work harder allowing it more space for all sorts of interpretations which would usually work against the interest of the manipulators >TV stations and groups behind.
Wolf- I'm sorry but this was not interesting enough for me to watch. It looks like many similar movies I watched at the Kenyon Fil Festival, circa 1968 or so. It also reminds me of PAIKS videos of about that time. I would be interested in hearing from you as to when it was made and what your main ideas were for it at the time. -Don Boyd
vostell made it a very long time ago and was Paiks inspiration to start using video in his art and they were good friends. vostell was the first video artist, predating paik and others.
Wolf's long dead & got other fish to fry. Vid Art was a new media in the 60's and +-provocative to the eyes/minds back then. Today, the synapses are conditioned according to now. Certain Art Statements (of the 60's) are to be quite likely irrelevant today. Did their job back then and to be switched off afterwards (except for the museums). Expectations that things have to last forever are illusionary, look at good food! Wolf obviously lived for the Now, a modest & sympathetic gesture.
I agree with you. Wolf´s research about the "new media" of his time was so important to nowadays art movements that it is simply impossible to think about it without considering the movement ot video and computer art. He was a brilliant artist. Pity not everybody understand his meaning. But I was glad to hear that you do.
Of course, can be re-entered anytime - agree. To add >the resulting impact of an art statement is first related to the Zeitgeist at which point it was created. It may then be perceived:In phase (time-wise), out of phase (as with many old Masters) or in-phase again later resonance-wise. Some things come back again & again, may even take on a new meaning etc...
What the hell ?!
DoomSoLdier16 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So inspiring! Please, check our channel!
FLUXBROS 10 months ago
Hey check out my experimental tribute video its called "Probability of chance".
Jusstfnsk8 1 year ago
does the original film look like this? because it seems to me that the frames per second of the film/projection and the digital camera are not the same...?
GallopingDog 1 year ago
großartig*
susannehaller 1 year ago
dude wtf? i think i got a seizure?
ShaltNot07 1 year ago
It was part of a wider art movement that saw destruction as an important part of creativity than previously considered. Wolf Vostell was a German artist and one of the key figures in the dias (destruction in art) movement with his form of the idea called de/collage On it's own this film would not mean that much to any unknowing viewer (other than perhaps that it was somewhat like abstract painting using the tv screen) but once looked at in this wider picture of deconstruction and dismantling
pablorobo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
explain to me why this is important
duhumberthumbert 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
explain to me why this is important
kvduhamel 1 year ago
this has no sense, things like this cant be art.
ORubenzgzO 1 year ago
@ORubenzgzO Come now... it's simply not your attitude.
Zeanu 6 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
que pendejada
Parladaz 2 years ago
que elocuente
Carameeloo 1 year ago
que bueno!
adrianariasperu 2 years ago
As a Vj I have been hugly influeneced by Wolf ,Paik, Brakhage But this video is absolutely a momentous work for me. I remember seeing it at film school and seeing it here reminds me of how It made me feel, liberated. please check my video response
Redstar309Z 3 years ago 3
Is this one of the first works of Vostell? the ones which appeared at 1959? Need a bit of help, the images showed, are from TV and then transformed?
FedericoSantarsiero 2 years ago
great!
earthlydelights2006 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
im digging this video! my names Elizabeth, kinda feelin bored if any1 wants to join me on cam or wana chat i will be signed on at __ PLAY-CAM...dot...COM __ my user ID there is Elizabeth_epxxqj chat soon xx its FR33 to j0in! mwah
heatherp526 3 years ago
uzuri's mother
gecekusu36 3 years ago
Vostell reverts to the effect of early TV transmission test pictures from the 30's where electronic synchronisation was a major task. Later, technological progress presented the brains smoother imagery which made it easier to find sense/interpretation'. This video shows imagery with large holes in-between, the brain has to work harder allowing it more space for all sorts of interpretations which would usually work against the interest of the manipulators >TV stations and groups behind.
PyePye7 4 years ago 7
I do love fluxus, but I think I prefer the Dada manifesto ;D
blueseagull 4 years ago
vostell it´s most primitive than paik. No is the first, they are only ones.
teonasno 4 years ago
Is this a translation machine?
PyePye7 4 years ago 3
Wolf- I'm sorry but this was not interesting enough for me to watch. It looks like many similar movies I watched at the Kenyon Fil Festival, circa 1968 or so. It also reminds me of PAIKS videos of about that time. I would be interested in hearing from you as to when it was made and what your main ideas were for it at the time. -Don Boyd
dboyd 5 years ago
vostell made it a very long time ago and was Paiks inspiration to start using video in his art and they were good friends. vostell was the first video artist, predating paik and others.
sjh343 5 years ago
Wolf's long dead & got other fish to fry. Vid Art was a new media in the 60's and +-provocative to the eyes/minds back then. Today, the synapses are conditioned according to now. Certain Art Statements (of the 60's) are to be quite likely irrelevant today. Did their job back then and to be switched off afterwards (except for the museums). Expectations that things have to last forever are illusionary, look at good food! Wolf obviously lived for the Now, a modest & sympathetic gesture.
PyePye7 4 years ago
I agree with you. Wolf´s research about the "new media" of his time was so important to nowadays art movements that it is simply impossible to think about it without considering the movement ot video and computer art. He was a brilliant artist. Pity not everybody understand his meaning. But I was glad to hear that you do.
aurileide 4 years ago
why cannot this work be re-entered at anytime.. my synapses still snap to Rembrandt etc and are not set to any o'clock
popeseyes 4 years ago
Of course, can be re-entered anytime - agree. To add >the resulting impact of an art statement is first related to the Zeitgeist at which point it was created. It may then be perceived:In phase (time-wise), out of phase (as with many old Masters) or in-phase again later resonance-wise. Some things come back again & again, may even take on a new meaning etc...
PyePye7 4 years ago
loved
livmassei 5 years ago 2