Some creationists are now claiming all animals were vegetarian before Noah's Farce, Genesis 1, verse 30, but some fossilized carnivores still have fossilized prey in their stomach.
creationists might have an overly sensitiv abstraction of thought? they like analogies but not analytic thinking. they mix up concepts wit reality and vice verca? I don't know, Its mind boggeling.
@lateralaus Petrification refers to the mineral SILICA replacing the original organic matter . The famous example is petrified trees in Arizona with the beutiful red , gold/ tan and clear crystal looking rock. Fossilization is often thought of as mineralization (but unspecific as to which of the many minerals where used) . There are a half dozen fossil methods types. Unaltered fossils are mumification or frozen in ice where the original body is still present but preserved (Mammoths ) .
@J2A4MEEE There was still land , its just there where no ice caps (melted) making sea level 600 feet higher .There was still dry land but it was baren and lifeless .
@flyingscience I was referring to the CREATION of the earth. There was no land at all until later when in Genesis 1:9. Before then there was only heaven and the sea.
@J2A4MEEE The bible was written by men who thought the world was flat and the center of the solar system.
Let there be light! Light is a Boson in the Standard Model of the atom, the force carrier for the Electromagnetic Force. When did God make the other Intermediate Vector Bosons?
You can't use the bible for a science book, it is not even a good history book.
"Even the noneducated YEC will be able to see that some things about these fossils just don't add up" My friend you are sorely underestimating the creationist's willful ignorance.
Unfortunately you will never be able to teach creationists anything. I guess that they know enough to flip burgers and clean toilets and they are happy enough with that.
@bustermk2 YECers as burger flippers and toilet cleaners? I'm good with that. Here's hoping that can be trained to at least that level of ability. They'll make nice pets once we speciate out from them. Remember to spay and neuter your pet YEC/IDiots before they get into trouble. Hell, I think we should start now with that public service. I've got a big pair of tin snips that aren't being used. Who's with me?
if there really is a god (which i strongly doubt) he is the funnyiest fucking pranskter ever. in my opinion irony is hilarious, and god would be the master of it
@Raverlutionary The dates on these sediments show slow and gadual deposition of a tiny amount per thousand years .The math of the reefs is parralel to this , it takes more than a century per layer to grow reefs of such complexity .(think like old forest growth its visualy obvious ).
@flyingscience you people are demonic, with your pierced faces, rings in your noses., pot smoking vile evil people. There are no millions of years. It never happened.
@Revolutionary Lime stone is accumulated VERY slowly from the trickle down of Oolitic microscopic lime shells of plankton like creature . Hurricanes are an exception they can dump sediments in a day they are visually very different in appearance .
This doesn't debunk anything. Whether you're right or not, THIS ALONE certainly isn't enough to make a strong case against a global flood. Sedimentary layers full of sorted, fossilized organisms work RIGHT into the flood theory, no matter where they're found, because a global flood would produce EXACTLY this effect. Organisms could be sorted based on MANY other things: density, environment, intelligence, etc. Take scientific truth as authority, people... not scientific authority as the truth
1 @Raverlutionary I wish I had a dollar every time I had to explain this .A -they are dated at 440 million years old ,each centimeter dates at a thousand years .B. There are no land plants or animals alive at this time .C Sea storms cant relocate and plant /put in place reefs !
2@Raverlutionary A sea storm force that could move delicate coral/ bryozoan reefs thousands of miles would also smash it to bits .A tornado cant reassemble a jet from a scrapyard .Seastorms cant reassemble communities . These are thriving communities ,there are thousands of burried flat layers of INTACT reefs .
@flyingscience But isn't the idea of these organisms, being swept thousands of miles inland from where the ocean is NOW, based on the assumption that the oceans existed PRE-GLOBAL CATASTROPHE exactly the way they exist today? We'd have no way of knowing where water bodies existed which were habitable to these or any organisms. Also I hate to bring up the obvious, but you're GLUING THESE TOGETHER! Why's this not an indication they could've been buried & broken, assuming they DIDN'T travel so far?
The creationists are the ones that claim the flood made all the fossils .The reefs are standing upright in their grown position .Ive seen them eroding out and collected them with the bases still attached to the sea floor .They are broken due to being delicate and under hundreds of tons of pressure of rock layers above them .There are whole ones unbroken as well .
@Raverlutionary A sea storm cant transport them and then deliver and plant them side by side as if they had grown in plave . The communities / reefs are seen in a natural setting not a storm setting .Leonardo Da Vinci first figured that out by compareing real flood aftermaths.
@flyingscience ...okay, well I don't see how that response was a refutation of my point, as much as it was like plugging your ears and going "la la la". Your ENTIRE "debunking" is based on the assumption that if there were a worldwide flood, all of this coral would've had to have been transported to its home FROM the CURRENT location of the ocean, when it's just as easy to assume that THIS place was once habitable for coral before the flood buried it in mud, fossilizing it into sedimentary rock.
@Revolutionary Correct ,the Cincinnatian series (name of the rock layers that are 700 feet thick lime stone & shale layers that blankets the Earth) was created slowly as sea floor accumulation . Noahs flood is imaginary it has no evidence to support it .
@Revolutionary If there had been some type of Deluge flood contributing to these rock series the rocks would date as recent and their would be modern sea life mixed in .There is no modern sea life mixed in (extinct species only) .The dating is ancient with about an inch layer representing a thousand years passage .
@flyingscience ...years worth of mutation and speciation. As for larger and more complex organisms such as fish, whales, seals, and the like... once again, this is not a problem for the flood theory as there is such a huge array of other variables such as environment, intelligence, mass, density, etc which would sort these organisms in different layers than denser bottom-dwellers like the ones you're displaying. The very presence of world-wide sedimentation is evidence of world-wide flood.
The fossils are layered like this, In the bottom layer of rock are shell fossils, above that is a layer with shells and fish fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish and amphibians fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian and reptile fossils, above that is a layer with shells, fish, amphibian, reptile fossils and dinosaur fossils SEE a Pattern? There are no human fossils found in any of these layers. No dating methods used Floods don't sort that way.
@Raverlutionary About every inch differs in date from the previous layer, no modern species at all no big brain coral or modern fish ,shrimp , snails , whales ,seals etc.. No deposition at all of Holocene modern rocks , paleozoic age dates and fauna only .
3@Raverlutionary Can you understand that thousands of buried intact reefs layers CANT be made by violent storms . It represents actual history of decades and centuries at EACH layer . Think of it like buried forests MAYBE you'll get it . I pray (wish) that God (wonders of the Cosmos) can grace you with inteligence to go further .
@Revolutionary How can you watch this video and NOT get it ? Did you watch to the end ? Reefs intact can ONLY be grown here .Grown in place and with thousands of older layers below .MOST creationists will simply say this from BEFORE the flood NOT from the flood .Of course the other issue is animals evolving in the strata incrementally .
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
one thing we do not know what parts of the world was sea and what parts was land before the flood.
there is evidens, that there was a world flood,one thing we all believe in that something did happen many many years ago,catestrofic event took place.
Please show me the source for this evidence. I think its crazy that no scientists have this evidence but you do. So please send it to this account. Quickly!
The father of creationism Henry Morris popularized the idea (which he plagiarized from a psychic channler /cult ) that the entire geologic column was created by Noahs flood .
Geology 101 the paleozoic seas lasted for millions of years , their fossilized intact reefs burried layer upon layer are evidence of millions of years (like counting tree rings ) negating a flood hypothesis (less than 1 years time) .
Special instant creationism is negated by a fossil record sequence in an evolutionary chronolgical order .Creationism and catastrophism have been replaced by evolution and gradualism .
its from a childrens show on disney chanel called phineas and ferb there is this evil scientist who makes giant machines like this heartbeat thing to control babies and called it like the heartbeatinator
I can't stand it when IDiots say, ''there are clams on the top of mountains, proving the flood", when in reality, whole sea bed are the tops of mountains
Can you prove that? Didn't think so. if you could, you would be known worldwide. I can't believe you are a scientist the way you debate. I'm no scholar, but i would expect more from someone like yourself.
Can I prove what ? Proof is actualy an incorect term to even use .Proof is for mathmatics only .Courtcases use the word prove but not science .You'd have to read up why .
@flyingscience "The universe cam from Transcendental Singularity ,you can call that God .I doubt its a man with a beard that tortures infidels though."
Indeed. They take something so simple and saddle it up with a human ego.
I personally think religions origins are from flawed agenda driven ,corrupt humans .This is seen world wide in all lands where religious leaders where mixed with Pharaohs , emperors ,popes ,kings etc..
you said there is no evidence of a flood, yet you also said water was over 600 feet. Kinda contradictory huh? "after ice caps melted" you too can't prove ice caps melted.
If you want evidence, why not go to the ex-heavily guarded mt ararat and disprove all creationist that noah's ark is not there. It's very simple. but then be able to explain why gopher wood would exist there in that region. taletell is throwing out numbers like 13 billions years. How do those numbers come about...please say carbon testing.
The Only way Noahs ark could have been real is if Dr .Who helped Noah .You would need a tardis to fit the animals .Youd need a time machine to get all species on board before those in the back line died waiting their turn .
Hell evolved theologically . Christian hell was unknown to the Jews . Skeptics know the history of religion .Don't accept the Sunday school version at face value .Ask the hard questions in life .
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I had to come back to this. Readers...case and point...This is an example of poor science. What scientist assertains conclusives evidence based on what a billion people believe. So if they all jump off a bridge will you too? I can sense your hate about God, but you still don't prove anything.
Religion is a complex subject to understand it well you have to understand psychology , sociology , political history , history and science .Critical thinking skills are a must (lacking by all fundamentalists).
Scub - I'm an amature paleontoligists who lives on top of a world famous fossil layer .The subject at hand is that these reefs grew in place over hundreds of millions of years .These where not transported by a fictional deluge .
@scubisnax1: I've had the dubious honor of going back and rereading all your posts thus far in this video. Lots of personal assertations, but not one cold, hard fact. The closest you come to a citation is that BS bible quote. Science doesn't work on your say so. It's about what you can prove. What does the evidence say. And be specific. Thus far, all you've proven that the cult of the uneducated amatuer is alive and well on YT. CITE IT or GTFO.
Hundreds of creationists have written in .You are the first to claim Noahs ark on a mountain validates creationism .The boat claim doesn't even validate the flood story .I'm listening tell more.
here's what I'm saying. The bible says the ark is in Mt Ararat. The bible doesn't contradict itself. so if you can prove it's not there, then you win, bc you can now say the bible finally contradicted itself. Very easy experiment. Your fellow atheist should jump all over that.
Scub - you must be brand new to internet debating . The burden of proof is always on those making the claim .A negative cant usualy be proven .You cant disprove bigfoot , unicorns or fairies .
Both special creationism and Noahs flood differ from all other bible stories .Both would leave taletale evidence world wide in great abundance -they didnt !
The burden of proof is on the believers to back up their claims with good evidence that statues cry blood , Ararat wood was from an ark , Benny Hinn healed cripples etc .etc.
Scub have you read any articles on bible errors or contradictions ?Simply google bible math errors for starters .Skeptics ask the hard questions in life
Scub -this may come as a shock to you but the bible isn't an actual transcript of real conversations . Less than 20% of Jesus actually words are accurate according to the majority of bible scholars.
Noahs fllod is disprovable by medicine , geology . physics , biology . You need to read the links in the video description to know why we are certain there never was a universal flood
Paleozoic is before there where any large vertabrates or humans . Grown in place reefs and radiometric dating and stratigraphy cancel out that this was during human times .
that does not cancel anything. it doesn't disprove or prove. similar to creation. we can't physically prove it, same as you. we can only go by faith which comes by hearing the word of God.
The Earth being old or life evolving is supported by literaly the crust of the Earth .Faith has nothing to do with the methods of science .Faith means to shut up , submit and turn off your brain to accept dogma.
to someone who doesn't have faith sure it means all those things. Who laid the first cell? You can't answer that. But you debate those who have the written answer. Some other created being of a darwanistic theory.
The first life came from non life naturally and inevitably as far as can be understood . Genesis plagiarized from Babylonian creation myth .Not truth given on a silver platter .
Scub- you are made of recycled atoms and they have been in countless bodies before being in you .Atoms are non life but can be part of life's chemistry .
The chemical attraction of lifes origins is natural not supernatural .God as a potter blowing magical breath into pottery people and teracotta animals is religious poetry not modern science.
The ice caps are evidence there NEVER was a universal flood .A universal flood would have melted / covered the ice caps .Ice caps would have melted and floated off Antartica .
Creation museums will eventually be ridiculed right out of business. The only reason they're still around is because there are too many ignorant people, but that'll change eventually. Science will always pass the test of time, religion will always fail. Rest assured the truth will prevail; it's just a matter of time.
Even the freaks at the museum dont necesarily believe that the world actually came into existence the way genesis says. I've watched a number of interviews, and they've gotten very good at hidden disclaimers. "if genesis is right, then", and "we believe that", and "What we think probably happened"
The question is what they say to people off camera. If they are lying to children and saying that science backs this stuff up, they should be shot.
If you are in a crowded public place look at the faces of those around you .Note that most are not interested in the past or science at all . Easy comforting answers are popular and easily embraced.
psx- always write the name of the person you are messaging.Typically people who threaten torture to make conversions dont have many brain cells to begin with .
psx - More than 1 Billion Christians dont accept instant creation or a universal flood . Learn about writting styles of the bible . Jesus might forgive you for implying death / torture threats (on his behalf )but he may not .
psx - Imagine having a spouse that demanded you love them or else they would blow torch your face .You recognise that the spouse would be sick but not that religion is .Religion was bastardised and corrupt when it employs torture threats .
@psxwarrior: Accept Thor today or you'll find out who nailed who to a cross! Same BS, different name. The facts stand regardless of your superstition. I can go to any road cut and clearly see the changes in the life forms and reef environments fossilized since the Late Carboniferous. The earth herself testifies against such middle eastern mythological BS.
Creationism requires that complex, fully formed organisms are brought to life from clay statues (or somehow materialize independently,, fully formed, by some unseen force). Show an observed instance where this has ever happened.
AWB17a- Evolution is now known to be a fact no if ,and ,or butts about it .Evolution 100% falsifies biblical literaism .Evolution does not rule out God , 1 Billion + Christians accept evolution.
AWB - Evolution is a fact .That is the stand of the scientific community .Macro evolution is documented .If I'm wrong I owe you $1000 dollars .If I'm right you owe it to yourself to read some pro science books .
To be a creationist you have to believe evolution is fiction . Its already known by science to be a fact .Catch up and expand your horizons .Knowledge is the cure to fundamentalism of any religion !
excellent video, the museum is a testimony to the state of science education in parts of the country. How they raised 26 million demonstrates a lot about us. Thanks.
Evolution has the "living" evidence of atavism , hens with teeth , whales with baby legs , manatees with finger nails , humans with tails that wag etc. etc.
No guessing about this the evidence of evolution fills several hundred libraries. Genesis is plagiarized from anonymous oral tradition /campfire stories !
AWB - Your computer can set you free from the psychological cult like evils of fundamentalism .Study hard with curiosity to break free .Knowledge will set you free !
"I have studied this subject very hard, considered both sides of the argument - my conclusion is creation is more reasonable than evolution"
Then you really have not studied both sides. Have you looked at an Evolution textbook? That alone would show you monumental evidence for both micro AND macro evolution. I think you have only looked at evidence on Creation sites. There is NOT ONE Shred of evidence for Creation. NONE. Please post some.....
Have YOU ever studied a CREATION textbook?" THERE is none, LOL. 3 court cases decided it is RELIGION and can not be taught in class. lol. I have read many creationists sites, vids, was one myself, etc.
now are YOU kidding? DNA is no where near a programmable language even close to what man has done for software. seriously I have seen many many videos from creationists and it is laughable science. Where is the Nobel Prize that shows they have debunked Evolution?
haha, sorry but you said textbook, and seriously they are not allowed in classrooms so I dont consider them textbooks. The Dover trial closed that door a THIRD time.
so many points, looking over what you have said in the past you certainty appear to be a creationists.
2 - Abiogenesis is the science of how life began, Evoltuion is about common descent and speciation.
3 - Wow, another classic tactic of taking Darwin's quote OUT OF CONTEXT. I can post the entire quote here and he was NOT saying the eye evolve was insurmountably with Natural selection.
""" 3 - Wow, another classic tactic of taking Darwin's quote OUT OF CONTEXT. I can post the entire quote here and he was NOT saying the eye evolve was insurmountably with Natural selection. """
Whether it is out of context is debatable - we can't ask darwin what he meant - this has been well debated for decades.
The point I was trying to make was that Darwin was not a DEFINATE - 100% believer in evolution - he THOUGHT it was right.
DEBATABLE, no sorry friend. It IS out of context. You need to read the entire quote. AND YOU are right about one thing, Darwin did not have all the things and tools we have to show Natural Selection was right. He did not have all the thousands of fossils, 100s of thousands actually. But 150 yrs later we have them AND something new, the old Phylogenetic tree matches right up with the GENETIC tree. hmm, interesting huh? BOTH provide further proof for Evolution.
you microevolution, and no if you mean have seen a fly transform into a fly no, that takes many many years, BUT we have seen speciation AND we have the fossil record that we have predicted using the Phylogenetic tree AND now Genetic evidence.
4 - MOST of the world believes in Evolution. In the US it is one of the only industrialized nations, Turkey is the other, that has about half the population not believing in it. NOW that is a logical fallacy, we do not do Science by popularity contests or much of what we know would not be possible. There was a time when MOST people did not believe in Germs, believed blacks were inferior, etc etc. Science is done by evidence, empirical data and Evol has it.
People in the United States are much less likely to accept Darwin's idea that humans and apes share a common ancestor than adults in other Western nations, a number of surveys show.
In the U.S., only 14 percent of adults thought that evolution was "definitely true," while about a third firmly rejected the idea.
The investigation also showed that the percentage of U.S. adults who are uncertain about evolution has risen from 7 % to 21 % in the past 20 years.
you showed by the stats I was right. actually one poll shows (2006) that 39% think it is false and 21% are unsure.
Again, this means nothing to science. Science goes by Evidence and not popularity. I will bet there is a percentage of people who dont believe software will one day be as intelligent as people, sorry that is my field, Computer Science and we believe it will happen one day.
My stats showed that 86% do not believe it!!!!!!!!!!!!
The really interesting stat though is that the number of unbelievers is increasing according to the poll - this is despite the APPARENT increase in evidence.
Hey - its good to talk and debate stuff.
But I gotta go - from a grey and wet scotland - bye bye
huh? ok you are playing some funny numbers. no poll i have seen here in the US is that high. and again Science would not care if 90% dont believe. Science is science.
ok take care, I hope to visit Scotland one day, sent my kids to England and there last year.
Whats stupid about creationists and the big flood idea in regards to your nice collection of fossils, is that even in the flood theory, it doesnt last long enough to submerge normally exposed land and have coral grow and fossilize in that short space of time, neither does their super flood theory make sense because wouldnt ofssils etc be scattered equally around large continental areas, evelution and science wins again, nice vid and fossils. cheers
If the evil bullshitter Matthew wants to turn the other cheek,I'd be more than happy to lay him out.Sorry,that's just the way we did things on Chicago's south side.While I'm at it,I'd like any creationist to present me with one iota of scientific evidence to support ID.
"Unless they are making sense and distroying false arguments about the creation of Earth, in which case, use Votebots and insult them in the comments section".
Therealmunkone wrote :I feel really bad for the kids that will have to take remedial science classes and be laughed at later on in life after visiting this sincere but severely misinformed museum.
If we close restaurants due to unsafe food handling this place should be closed for the mishandling of science
I feel really bad for the kids that will have to take remedial science classes and be laughed at later on in life after visiting this sincere but severely misinformed museum.
If we close restaurants due to unsafe food handling this place should be closed for the mishandling of science.
Therealmunkone- Munk out of all thousands of comments Ive gotten on this subject yours gets the blue ribbon for being the best! Should be on a T shirt !
NO WAI! The DEVIL put those strata layers there to confuse us into thinking it wasn't Jesus! He also put in all those transitional fossils and that thar evilution! :p
Nice video, I don't see enough geologists vids, mostly biologists and physicists.. You could be a bit more terse with your explanations though, but I suppose it's hard to be concise without a transcript.
My pastor says Bryozoans are the work of the devil. the Devil is trying to trick us with undeniable facts and isochron dating methods to sway us from God!I have burned all my science books that provide irrefutable proof that the earth accreted 3.7gya from a stellar nebula seeded with heavy elements from a nearby supernova. Join me my christian brothers in riding the world of these evils!
Comment removed
lewars1912 2 months ago
Fantastic video.
CaptainAwesomeoh13 3 months ago
Some creationists are now claiming all animals were vegetarian before Noah's Farce, Genesis 1, verse 30, but some fossilized carnivores still have fossilized prey in their stomach.
InternetDarkLord 6 months ago
@InternetDarkLord Not to mention teeth marks on some of the bones...
WWZenaDo 3 months ago 2
creationists might have an overly sensitiv abstraction of thought? they like analogies but not analytic thinking. they mix up concepts wit reality and vice verca? I don't know, Its mind boggeling.
ellensius 6 months ago
Question: If the sedimentary layer were deposited by a huge flood, where did it erode? Where was the sediment before the flood?
InternetDarkLord 7 months ago
Can someone explain the difference between fossilised and petrified please.
lateralaus 8 months ago
@lateralaus Petrification refers to the mineral SILICA replacing the original organic matter . The famous example is petrified trees in Arizona with the beutiful red , gold/ tan and clear crystal looking rock. Fossilization is often thought of as mineralization (but unspecific as to which of the many minerals where used) . There are a half dozen fossil methods types. Unaltered fossils are mumification or frozen in ice where the original body is still present but preserved (Mammoths ) .
flyingscience 8 months ago
Good job! Best regards from the Cologne Palaeontology Institute
Schatzomat 1 year ago
Creationists asking questions?
HAH.
Cyllid 1 year ago
Comment removed
J2A4MEEE 1 year ago
Comment removed
J2A4MEEE 1 year ago
AAAaaa the earth was covered with WATER BEFORE land was even formed! Life was in the sea before the land...those PESKY facts!
J2A4MEEE 1 year ago
@J2A4MEEE There was still land , its just there where no ice caps (melted) making sea level 600 feet higher .There was still dry land but it was baren and lifeless .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@flyingscience I was referring to the CREATION of the earth. There was no land at all until later when in Genesis 1:9. Before then there was only heaven and the sea.
J2A4MEEE 1 year ago
@J2A4MEEE If we refer to Detective Comics issue 1 page 1 we find out that Batman is real as well
glemmstengal 1 year ago 10
@J2A4MEEE ya but god created life after he seperated land and water
SHIBBYiPANDA 1 year ago
@flyingscience In Genesis 1:9...No land only sea and heaven :c)
J2A4MEEE 1 year ago
@flyingscience In Genesis 1:9...No land only sea and heaven :c)
J2A4MEEE 1 year ago
@flyingscience In Genesis 1:9...No land only sea and heaven :c)
J2A4MEEE 1 year ago
@J2A4MEEE shall i quote the scientology religious doctrines? they hold just as much worth as the book your quoting.
myco578 1 year ago
@J2A4MEEE The bible was written by men who thought the world was flat and the center of the solar system.
Let there be light! Light is a Boson in the Standard Model of the atom, the force carrier for the Electromagnetic Force. When did God make the other Intermediate Vector Bosons?
You can't use the bible for a science book, it is not even a good history book.
Watch the video you are spamming.
gregrutz 8 months ago
"Even the noneducated YEC will be able to see that some things about these fossils just don't add up" My friend you are sorely underestimating the creationist's willful ignorance.
shldflght 1 year ago 3
The flood did it. The flood did it. The flood did everything. Just look in the Bibel.
gregrutz 1 year ago
Unfortunately you will never be able to teach creationists anything. I guess that they know enough to flip burgers and clean toilets and they are happy enough with that.
bustermk2 1 year ago 8
@bustermk2 they go on to scam ignorant church goers out of 10% of their income, seems illegal to me
sbslusher 1 year ago
@bustermk2 YECers as burger flippers and toilet cleaners? I'm good with that. Here's hoping that can be trained to at least that level of ability. They'll make nice pets once we speciate out from them. Remember to spay and neuter your pet YEC/IDiots before they get into trouble. Hell, I think we should start now with that public service. I've got a big pair of tin snips that aren't being used. Who's with me?
NorthForkFisherman 10 months ago
@bustermk2
Exactly, to creationists, ignorance is a VIRTUE, and autonomous, rational and objective use of the mind is SINFUL.
OrthodoxDarwinist 2 months ago 2
if there really is a god (which i strongly doubt) he is the funnyiest fucking pranskter ever. in my opinion irony is hilarious, and god would be the master of it
robertwc82 1 year ago
@Raverlutionary The dates on these sediments show slow and gadual deposition of a tiny amount per thousand years .The math of the reefs is parralel to this , it takes more than a century per layer to grow reefs of such complexity .(think like old forest growth its visualy obvious ).
flyingscience 1 year ago
@flyingscience you people are demonic, with your pierced faces, rings in your noses., pot smoking vile evil people. There are no millions of years. It never happened.
DragMeToHellLuc 1 year ago
@DragMeToHellLuc Dont pretend to be a YEC there are enough real ones .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@Revolutionary Lime stone is accumulated VERY slowly from the trickle down of Oolitic microscopic lime shells of plankton like creature . Hurricanes are an exception they can dump sediments in a day they are visually very different in appearance .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@Raverlutionary - IF creationists could be swayed by science and facts there wouldnt be any creationists.
flyingscience 1 year ago
This doesn't debunk anything. Whether you're right or not, THIS ALONE certainly isn't enough to make a strong case against a global flood. Sedimentary layers full of sorted, fossilized organisms work RIGHT into the flood theory, no matter where they're found, because a global flood would produce EXACTLY this effect. Organisms could be sorted based on MANY other things: density, environment, intelligence, etc. Take scientific truth as authority, people... not scientific authority as the truth
Raverlutionary 1 year ago
1 @Raverlutionary I wish I had a dollar every time I had to explain this .A -they are dated at 440 million years old ,each centimeter dates at a thousand years .B. There are no land plants or animals alive at this time .C Sea storms cant relocate and plant /put in place reefs !
flyingscience 1 year ago
2@Raverlutionary A sea storm force that could move delicate coral/ bryozoan reefs thousands of miles would also smash it to bits .A tornado cant reassemble a jet from a scrapyard .Seastorms cant reassemble communities . These are thriving communities ,there are thousands of burried flat layers of INTACT reefs .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@flyingscience But isn't the idea of these organisms, being swept thousands of miles inland from where the ocean is NOW, based on the assumption that the oceans existed PRE-GLOBAL CATASTROPHE exactly the way they exist today? We'd have no way of knowing where water bodies existed which were habitable to these or any organisms. Also I hate to bring up the obvious, but you're GLUING THESE TOGETHER! Why's this not an indication they could've been buried & broken, assuming they DIDN'T travel so far?
Raverlutionary 1 year ago
The creationists are the ones that claim the flood made all the fossils .The reefs are standing upright in their grown position .Ive seen them eroding out and collected them with the bases still attached to the sea floor .They are broken due to being delicate and under hundreds of tons of pressure of rock layers above them .There are whole ones unbroken as well .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@Raverlutionary A sea storm cant transport them and then deliver and plant them side by side as if they had grown in plave . The communities / reefs are seen in a natural setting not a storm setting .Leonardo Da Vinci first figured that out by compareing real flood aftermaths.
flyingscience 1 year ago
@flyingscience ...okay, well I don't see how that response was a refutation of my point, as much as it was like plugging your ears and going "la la la". Your ENTIRE "debunking" is based on the assumption that if there were a worldwide flood, all of this coral would've had to have been transported to its home FROM the CURRENT location of the ocean, when it's just as easy to assume that THIS place was once habitable for coral before the flood buried it in mud, fossilizing it into sedimentary rock.
Raverlutionary 1 year ago
@Revolutionary Correct ,the Cincinnatian series (name of the rock layers that are 700 feet thick lime stone & shale layers that blankets the Earth) was created slowly as sea floor accumulation . Noahs flood is imaginary it has no evidence to support it .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@Revolutionary If there had been some type of Deluge flood contributing to these rock series the rocks would date as recent and their would be modern sea life mixed in .There is no modern sea life mixed in (extinct species only) .The dating is ancient with about an inch layer representing a thousand years passage .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@flyingscience ...years worth of mutation and speciation. As for larger and more complex organisms such as fish, whales, seals, and the like... once again, this is not a problem for the flood theory as there is such a huge array of other variables such as environment, intelligence, mass, density, etc which would sort these organisms in different layers than denser bottom-dwellers like the ones you're displaying. The very presence of world-wide sedimentation is evidence of world-wide flood.
Raverlutionary 1 year ago
gregrutz 1 year ago
@Raverlutionary About every inch differs in date from the previous layer, no modern species at all no big brain coral or modern fish ,shrimp , snails , whales ,seals etc.. No deposition at all of Holocene modern rocks , paleozoic age dates and fauna only .
flyingscience 1 year ago
3@Raverlutionary Can you understand that thousands of buried intact reefs layers CANT be made by violent storms . It represents actual history of decades and centuries at EACH layer . Think of it like buried forests MAYBE you'll get it . I pray (wish) that God (wonders of the Cosmos) can grace you with inteligence to go further .
flyingscience 1 year ago
@Revolutionary How can you watch this video and NOT get it ? Did you watch to the end ? Reefs intact can ONLY be grown here .Grown in place and with thousands of older layers below .MOST creationists will simply say this from BEFORE the flood NOT from the flood .Of course the other issue is animals evolving in the strata incrementally .
flyingscience 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
one thing we do not know what parts of the world was sea and what parts was land before the flood.
there is evidens, that there was a world flood,one thing we all believe in that something did happen many many years ago,catestrofic event took place.
lovesack 2 years ago
lol argument by assertion for the win
TheLastCoolName 2 years ago
@lovesack Yes! I'm glad you straightened us out on the "evidens". Breathing through your mouth DOES make you smarter!
pureevilfnord 2 years ago
Here's a clue: If there is sedimentary rock, there was water.
...and there is no evidence for a world-wide flood. Quite the contrary actually.
TheFifthApes 2 years ago
Please show me the source for this evidence. I think its crazy that no scientists have this evidence but you do. So please send it to this account. Quickly!
greencrack666 2 years ago
If I understand you right, the fossils you have are not part of the global flood so creation is wrong. What did I miss?
Wootah111 2 years ago
The father of creationism Henry Morris popularized the idea (which he plagiarized from a psychic channler /cult ) that the entire geologic column was created by Noahs flood .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Geology 101 the paleozoic seas lasted for millions of years , their fossilized intact reefs burried layer upon layer are evidence of millions of years (like counting tree rings ) negating a flood hypothesis (less than 1 years time) .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Special instant creationism is negated by a fossil record sequence in an evolutionary chronolgical order .Creationism and catastrophism have been replaced by evolution and gradualism .
flyingscience 2 years ago
i will use my new "inator" to take over the entire tri state area
XavierDrake 2 years ago
What is an "inator" ?
flyingscience 2 years ago
its from a childrens show on disney chanel called phineas and ferb there is this evil scientist who makes giant machines like this heartbeat thing to control babies and called it like the heartbeatinator
i just couldnt think of one haha
XavierDrake 2 years ago
I can't stand it when IDiots say, ''there are clams on the top of mountains, proving the flood", when in reality, whole sea bed are the tops of mountains
gregrutz 2 years ago 3
The universe cam from Transcendental Singularity ,you can call that God .I doubt its a man with a beard that tortures infidels though.
flyingscience 2 years ago
Can you prove that? Didn't think so. if you could, you would be known worldwide. I can't believe you are a scientist the way you debate. I'm no scholar, but i would expect more from someone like yourself.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Can I prove what ? Proof is actualy an incorect term to even use .Proof is for mathmatics only .Courtcases use the word prove but not science .You'd have to read up why .
flyingscience 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@flyingscience "The universe cam from Transcendental Singularity ,you can call that God .I doubt its a man with a beard that tortures infidels though."
Indeed. They take something so simple and saddle it up with a human ego.
DireDowns 1 year ago
I personally think religions origins are from flawed agenda driven ,corrupt humans .This is seen world wide in all lands where religious leaders where mixed with Pharaohs , emperors ,popes ,kings etc..
flyingscience 2 years ago
Some people incorporate science with religion .Some people ignore all of science in favor of cozy warm comfortable simple answers .
flyingscience 2 years ago
you said there is no evidence of a flood, yet you also said water was over 600 feet. Kinda contradictory huh? "after ice caps melted" you too can't prove ice caps melted.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Paleozoic flooding is not a universal flood .Universal flood is fictional that WOULD have left enourmous taletell evidence .
flyingscience 2 years ago
If you want evidence, why not go to the ex-heavily guarded mt ararat and disprove all creationist that noah's ark is not there. It's very simple. but then be able to explain why gopher wood would exist there in that region. taletell is throwing out numbers like 13 billions years. How do those numbers come about...please say carbon testing.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
The age of the universe is now understood very precisely to 4 decimal places . Carbon dating is not used , carbon dating is easily contaminated .
flyingscience 2 years ago
The Only way Noahs ark could have been real is if Dr .Who helped Noah .You would need a tardis to fit the animals .Youd need a time machine to get all species on board before those in the back line died waiting their turn .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Well I'm making it easy for you and and your supreme leader dawkins. Go check out mt ararat and disprove creation and God all at once. C'mon.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Remember more than 1 Billion Christians accept evolution and are NOT fundamentalists . Creationism is falsified by evolution not Mt . Ararat .
flyingscience 2 years ago
that's not new. remember Matthew 7:13
[ The Narrow Way ] Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Hell evolved theologically . Christian hell was unknown to the Jews . Skeptics know the history of religion .Don't accept the Sunday school version at face value .Ask the hard questions in life .
flyingscience 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I had to come back to this. Readers...case and point...This is an example of poor science. What scientist assertains conclusives evidence based on what a billion people believe. So if they all jump off a bridge will you too? I can sense your hate about God, but you still don't prove anything.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Sub- I'm not a scientist , the point I was making was that fundalmentalism and literalism is NOT mainstream in Christianity .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Scub - I dont hate God , I am critical of organised religion . Religion uses cult like tactics of threatning non members & exmembers with torture .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Religion is a complex subject to understand it well you have to understand psychology , sociology , political history , history and science .Critical thinking skills are a must (lacking by all fundamentalists).
flyingscience 2 years ago
Scub - I'm an amature paleontoligists who lives on top of a world famous fossil layer .The subject at hand is that these reefs grew in place over hundreds of millions of years .These where not transported by a fictional deluge .
flyingscience 2 years ago
@scubisnax1: Wow. You can sense things? Psychic? Or just fulla pride and bullshit? The latter more likely.
magick205 2 years ago
LMAO!!!! I sense the same thing about you too!!!
scubisnax1 2 years ago
@scubisnax1: I've had the dubious honor of going back and rereading all your posts thus far in this video. Lots of personal assertations, but not one cold, hard fact. The closest you come to a citation is that BS bible quote. Science doesn't work on your say so. It's about what you can prove. What does the evidence say. And be specific. Thus far, all you've proven that the cult of the uneducated amatuer is alive and well on YT. CITE IT or GTFO.
magick205 2 years ago
Hundreds of creationists have written in .You are the first to claim Noahs ark on a mountain validates creationism .The boat claim doesn't even validate the flood story .I'm listening tell more.
flyingscience 2 years ago
here's what I'm saying. The bible says the ark is in Mt Ararat. The bible doesn't contradict itself. so if you can prove it's not there, then you win, bc you can now say the bible finally contradicted itself. Very easy experiment. Your fellow atheist should jump all over that.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Scub - you must be brand new to internet debating . The burden of proof is always on those making the claim .A negative cant usualy be proven .You cant disprove bigfoot , unicorns or fairies .
flyingscience 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And likewise you can"t disprove biblical creation. You can come close, but no cigar. Readers, check other sources.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Scub - This issue is resolved in mainstream science . The fossil record is in an evolutionary sequence world wide .Genome maping had the final word .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Both special creationism and Noahs flood differ from all other bible stories .Both would leave taletale evidence world wide in great abundance -they didnt !
flyingscience 2 years ago
The burden of proof is on the believers to back up their claims with good evidence that statues cry blood , Ararat wood was from an ark , Benny Hinn healed cripples etc .etc.
flyingscience 2 years ago
Scub have you read any articles on bible errors or contradictions ?Simply google bible math errors for starters .Skeptics ask the hard questions in life
flyingscience 2 years ago
Scub -this may come as a shock to you but the bible isn't an actual transcript of real conversations . Less than 20% of Jesus actually words are accurate according to the majority of bible scholars.
flyingscience 2 years ago
Noahs fllod is disprovable by medicine , geology . physics , biology . You need to read the links in the video description to know why we are certain there never was a universal flood
flyingscience 2 years ago
Paleozoic is before there where any large vertabrates or humans . Grown in place reefs and radiometric dating and stratigraphy cancel out that this was during human times .
flyingscience 2 years ago
that does not cancel anything. it doesn't disprove or prove. similar to creation. we can't physically prove it, same as you. we can only go by faith which comes by hearing the word of God.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
The Earth being old or life evolving is supported by literaly the crust of the Earth .Faith has nothing to do with the methods of science .Faith means to shut up , submit and turn off your brain to accept dogma.
flyingscience 2 years ago
to someone who doesn't have faith sure it means all those things. Who laid the first cell? You can't answer that. But you debate those who have the written answer. Some other created being of a darwanistic theory.
scubisnax1 2 years ago
The first life came from non life naturally and inevitably as far as can be understood . Genesis plagiarized from Babylonian creation myth .Not truth given on a silver platter .
flyingscience 2 years ago
so you are saying non-life can create a life...hmmmm...yeah that adds up
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Scub- you are made of recycled atoms and they have been in countless bodies before being in you .Atoms are non life but can be part of life's chemistry .
flyingscience 2 years ago
The atoms in your body used to be inside stars , not just one but several .The stars died so that you could live .Google population 2 two stars .
flyingscience 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You believe everything on the internet?
scubisnax1 2 years ago
The chemical attraction of lifes origins is natural not supernatural .God as a potter blowing magical breath into pottery people and teracotta animals is religious poetry not modern science.
flyingscience 2 years ago
The ice caps are evidence there NEVER was a universal flood .A universal flood would have melted / covered the ice caps .Ice caps would have melted and floated off Antartica .
flyingscience 2 years ago
it doesn't have anything to do with the way that the earth is tilted and facing the sun? hmmmm...thus winter, fall, spring, summer????
scubisnax1 2 years ago
Antartic ice layers can be dated to be far older than a YEC Earth .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Why did you disable rating? That is of course to prevent the creationist vote bots?
crzer07 2 years ago 2
Creation museums will eventually be ridiculed right out of business. The only reason they're still around is because there are too many ignorant people, but that'll change eventually. Science will always pass the test of time, religion will always fail. Rest assured the truth will prevail; it's just a matter of time.
a0eoj 2 years ago 13
@a0eoj Agreed, and well said :D
TheJackassManiacs 1 year ago
@a0eoj LOLOLOL NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MAN I REALLY THINK WE SHOULD SAVE THEM FOREVER..... GREATEST SOURCE OF COMEDY ON EARTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SHIBBYiPANDA 1 year ago
I love this...thank commonsense...
Iammrspickley 2 years ago 2
Damn these pesky facts.
lewisner 2 years ago 15
Yay! science! Very interesting video. Subs and thankings!
Ch35h1r3C47 2 years ago
Even the freaks at the museum dont necesarily believe that the world actually came into existence the way genesis says. I've watched a number of interviews, and they've gotten very good at hidden disclaimers. "if genesis is right, then", and "we believe that", and "What we think probably happened"
The question is what they say to people off camera. If they are lying to children and saying that science backs this stuff up, they should be shot.
seanbrockest 2 years ago 3
If you are in a crowded public place look at the faces of those around you .Note that most are not interested in the past or science at all . Easy comforting answers are popular and easily embraced.
flyingscience 2 years ago
sadly, you've hit the nail on the head :(
seanbrockest 2 years ago
I dont know about shot. Thats pretty harsh stuff man. Perhaps given a good slap and an education.
Ch35h1r3C47 2 years ago
education they got one already and did nothing with it and a slap will do nothing to them shot them may work just don't kill them
kokofan50 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing...very informative. I haved subbed and look forward to seeing more of your work...peace.
MasterOhSo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Epic * star. Accept Jesus today, or you will find out how wrong you are.
psxwarrior 2 years ago
psx- always write the name of the person you are messaging.Typically people who threaten torture to make conversions dont have many brain cells to begin with .
flyingscience 2 years ago
psx - More than 1 Billion Christians dont accept instant creation or a universal flood . Learn about writting styles of the bible . Jesus might forgive you for implying death / torture threats (on his behalf )but he may not .
flyingscience 2 years ago
psx - Imagine having a spouse that demanded you love them or else they would blow torch your face .You recognise that the spouse would be sick but not that religion is .Religion was bastardised and corrupt when it employs torture threats .
flyingscience 2 years ago
@psxwarrior: Accept Thor today or you'll find out who nailed who to a cross! Same BS, different name. The facts stand regardless of your superstition. I can go to any road cut and clearly see the changes in the life forms and reef environments fossilized since the Late Carboniferous. The earth herself testifies against such middle eastern mythological BS.
magick205 2 years ago
Appeal to force, fallacy, try again.
Tavereen 2 years ago
Creationism requires that complex, fully formed organisms are brought to life from clay statues (or somehow materialize independently,, fully formed, by some unseen force). Show an observed instance where this has ever happened.
CurbYrDogma 2 years ago
99% guess work my friend.
You might be absolutely right but it does not refute anything.
Creation?????
Evolution?????
Neither side has the killer evidence - but creation of some sort makes more sense to me.
The atlernative to creation is "nothing made everything" - which defies the basic science concept of cause and effect.
awb17a 2 years ago
AWB17a- Evolution is now known to be a fact no if ,and ,or butts about it .Evolution 100% falsifies biblical literaism .Evolution does not rule out God , 1 Billion + Christians accept evolution.
flyingscience 2 years ago
((( Evolution is now known to be a fact no if ,and ,or butts about it )))
Your statement is not true.
Natural selection is a fact - (Darwins finches had different shaped beaks!)
But "evolution" is ultimately the development of one species into another - this part is COMPLETELY unproven.
Even the great Richard dawkins will "grudingly" admit that if asked.
awb17a 2 years ago
AWB - Evolution is a fact .That is the stand of the scientific community .Macro evolution is documented .If I'm wrong I owe you $1000 dollars .If I'm right you owe it to yourself to read some pro science books .
flyingscience 2 years ago
To be a creationist you have to believe evolution is fiction . Its already known by science to be a fact .Catch up and expand your horizons .Knowledge is the cure to fundamentalism of any religion !
flyingscience 2 years ago
"facepalm"
mankey64 2 years ago
excellent video, the museum is a testimony to the state of science education in parts of the country. How they raised 26 million demonstrates a lot about us. Thanks.
easeconnect 2 years ago
Evolution has the "living" evidence of atavism , hens with teeth , whales with baby legs , manatees with finger nails , humans with tails that wag etc. etc.
flyingscience 2 years ago
No guessing about this the evidence of evolution fills several hundred libraries. Genesis is plagiarized from anonymous oral tradition /campfire stories !
flyingscience 2 years ago
AWB - Your computer can set you free from the psychological cult like evils of fundamentalism .Study hard with curiosity to break free .Knowledge will set you free !
flyingscience 2 years ago
((( Study hard with curiosity to break free )))
I have studied this subject very hard, considered both sides of the argument - my conclusion is creation is more reasonable than evolution
awb17a 2 years ago
"I have studied this subject very hard, considered both sides of the argument - my conclusion is creation is more reasonable than evolution"
Then you really have not studied both sides. Have you looked at an Evolution textbook? That alone would show you monumental evidence for both micro AND macro evolution. I think you have only looked at evidence on Creation sites. There is NOT ONE Shred of evidence for Creation. NONE. Please post some.....
easeconnect 2 years ago
I see - because I disagree with your beliefs - that means I have'nt studied the subject?????
Have YOU ever studied a CREATION textbook?
"" There is NOT ONE Shred of evidence for Creation ""
Are you having a laugh? Rather than me posting endless reems of evidence search youtube for Evolution debunked.
I was at a seminar a few months back of creation biologists and they ripped evolution to shreds.
DNA is a programmable language - where did it come from?
awb17a 2 years ago
Have YOU ever studied a CREATION textbook?" THERE is none, LOL. 3 court cases decided it is RELIGION and can not be taught in class. lol. I have read many creationists sites, vids, was one myself, etc.
now are YOU kidding? DNA is no where near a programmable language even close to what man has done for software. seriously I have seen many many videos from creationists and it is laughable science. Where is the Nobel Prize that shows they have debunked Evolution?
easeconnect 2 years ago
""" Have YOU ever studied a CREATION textbook?" THERE is none, LOL. 3 court cases decided it is RELIGION and can not be taught in class """
You need to look harder and take of the evolution blinkers as well.
awb17a 2 years ago
haha, sorry but you said textbook, and seriously they are not allowed in classrooms so I dont consider them textbooks. The Dover trial closed that door a THIRD time.
easeconnect 2 years ago
i am not a creationist and certainly do not believe the earth was created in 6 days as is taught at the creation museum.
All life comes from life - an undeniable fact.
When you do some deep research into Darwin you realise that he was not entirely cinvinced about it himself.
Darwin qoute - To suggest the eye evolved would be absurd.
I agree!
If their is SO much evidence why do most people NOT believe evolution is correct?
awb17a 2 years ago
so many points, looking over what you have said in the past you certainty appear to be a creationists.
2 - Abiogenesis is the science of how life began, Evoltuion is about common descent and speciation.
3 - Wow, another classic tactic of taking Darwin's quote OUT OF CONTEXT. I can post the entire quote here and he was NOT saying the eye evolve was insurmountably with Natural selection.
easeconnect 2 years ago
""" 3 - Wow, another classic tactic of taking Darwin's quote OUT OF CONTEXT. I can post the entire quote here and he was NOT saying the eye evolve was insurmountably with Natural selection. """
Whether it is out of context is debatable - we can't ask darwin what he meant - this has been well debated for decades.
The point I was trying to make was that Darwin was not a DEFINATE - 100% believer in evolution - he THOUGHT it was right.
awb17a 2 years ago
DEBATABLE, no sorry friend. It IS out of context. You need to read the entire quote. AND YOU are right about one thing, Darwin did not have all the things and tools we have to show Natural Selection was right. He did not have all the thousands of fossils, 100s of thousands actually. But 150 yrs later we have them AND something new, the old Phylogenetic tree matches right up with the GENETIC tree. hmm, interesting huh? BOTH provide further proof for Evolution.
easeconnect 2 years ago
""" Darwin did not have all the things and tools we have to show Natural Selection was right """
Hold on a minute - Natural selection is a FACT.
The unproven bit is natural slection transferring one species into another.
awb17a 2 years ago
you microevolution, and no if you mean have seen a fly transform into a fly no, that takes many many years, BUT we have seen speciation AND we have the fossil record that we have predicted using the Phylogenetic tree AND now Genetic evidence.
easeconnect 2 years ago
sorry i meant, you MEAN microevoluiion. btw, macroevolution is only microevolution over a longer period.
easeconnect 2 years ago
4 - MOST of the world believes in Evolution. In the US it is one of the only industrialized nations, Turkey is the other, that has about half the population not believing in it. NOW that is a logical fallacy, we do not do Science by popularity contests or much of what we know would not be possible. There was a time when MOST people did not believe in Germs, believed blacks were inferior, etc etc. Science is done by evidence, empirical data and Evol has it.
easeconnect 2 years ago
From National Geographic -
People in the United States are much less likely to accept Darwin's idea that humans and apes share a common ancestor than adults in other Western nations, a number of surveys show.
In the U.S., only 14 percent of adults thought that evolution was "definitely true," while about a third firmly rejected the idea.
The investigation also showed that the percentage of U.S. adults who are uncertain about evolution has risen from 7 % to 21 % in the past 20 years.
awb17a 2 years ago
you showed by the stats I was right. actually one poll shows (2006) that 39% think it is false and 21% are unsure.
Again, this means nothing to science. Science goes by Evidence and not popularity. I will bet there is a percentage of people who dont believe software will one day be as intelligent as people, sorry that is my field, Computer Science and we believe it will happen one day.
easeconnect 2 years ago
My stats showed that 86% do not believe it!!!!!!!!!!!!
The really interesting stat though is that the number of unbelievers is increasing according to the poll - this is despite the APPARENT increase in evidence.
Hey - its good to talk and debate stuff.
But I gotta go - from a grey and wet scotland - bye bye
awb17a 2 years ago
huh? ok you are playing some funny numbers. no poll i have seen here in the US is that high. and again Science would not care if 90% dont believe. Science is science.
ok take care, I hope to visit Scotland one day, sent my kids to England and there last year.
easeconnect 2 years ago
I would like to see the pole info... is it available online?
mpfield1966 2 years ago
What statistics are you asking about ? I might be able to help , I only just now read your request .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Whats stupid about creationists and the big flood idea in regards to your nice collection of fossils, is that even in the flood theory, it doesnt last long enough to submerge normally exposed land and have coral grow and fossilize in that short space of time, neither does their super flood theory make sense because wouldnt ofssils etc be scattered equally around large continental areas, evelution and science wins again, nice vid and fossils. cheers
01101100d 2 years ago
If the evil bullshitter Matthew wants to turn the other cheek,I'd be more than happy to lay him out.Sorry,that's just the way we did things on Chicago's south side.While I'm at it,I'd like any creationist to present me with one iota of scientific evidence to support ID.
akaDickBush 2 years ago
flyingscience:
Why did you disabled the ratings? This vid is good. 4 or 5 stars.
Is it because of Votebots? Well, talk about turning the other cheek.
Mathew 5:39:
"I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also"
Matthew 5:39.1
"Unless they are making sense and distroying false arguments about the creation of Earth, in which case, use Votebots and insult them in the comments section".
PT109Boat 2 years ago
Munk :I nominate your comment as the best I've ever read (regarding this subject ) because its short witty and funny and concise .
flyingscience 2 years ago
Therealmunkone wrote :I feel really bad for the kids that will have to take remedial science classes and be laughed at later on in life after visiting this sincere but severely misinformed museum.
If we close restaurants due to unsafe food handling this place should be closed for the mishandling of science
flyingscience 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I feel really bad for the kids that will have to take remedial science classes and be laughed at later on in life after visiting this sincere but severely misinformed museum.
If we close restaurants due to unsafe food handling this place should be closed for the mishandling of science.
THEREALMUNKONE 2 years ago 6
Therealmunkone- Munk out of all thousands of comments Ive gotten on this subject yours gets the blue ribbon for being the best! Should be on a T shirt !
flyingscience 2 years ago
PS :thats one artist /mural painter to another as well !
flyingscience 2 years ago
NO WAI! The DEVIL put those strata layers there to confuse us into thinking it wasn't Jesus! He also put in all those transitional fossils and that thar evilution! :p
Bardlettt 2 years ago
Nice video, I don't see enough geologists vids, mostly biologists and physicists.. You could be a bit more terse with your explanations though, but I suppose it's hard to be concise without a transcript.
Why do you have ratings disabled?
ddrddrddrddr 2 years ago
Madzyzome made my ribs hurt—from laughing. Creationists don't get irony. LOL
WTG dude.
percy8ferry 2 years ago
Percy - you may want to check madzy account channel . Madzy is pretending to be a dumb creationist for parody comedy .
flyingscience 2 years ago
I assure you sir, I am a creationist and quite dumb.
madzyzome 2 years ago 3
Your dumb only in a Betty Bowers (worlds best Christian) kind of way .You must look up her videos if you havent already .Very funny!
flyingscience 2 years ago
"I assure you sir, I am a creationist and quite dumb."
OH YEAH!!! Why no CAPITOLS then!!!
KennyTew2 2 years ago
You tube filters out all caps otherwise I would be all over that.
madzyzome 2 years ago
Dude, nice reconstruction of Bryozoans.
keiryuujin 2 years ago
My pastor says Bryozoans are the work of the devil. the Devil is trying to trick us with undeniable facts and isochron dating methods to sway us from God!I have burned all my science books that provide irrefutable proof that the earth accreted 3.7gya from a stellar nebula seeded with heavy elements from a nearby supernova. Join me my christian brothers in riding the world of these evils!
madzyzome 2 years ago