I've recently come to realize that it really isn't the US's business to assume we are the only one's who can do anything about the problems in the middle east. No matter how bad it might be over there, we have to fix our own problems before we can give serious thought about help other nations with theirs. it will only get worse for us if we continue down this 'big brother' mindset. And other nations don't like it anyway.
Yep its Bill interviewing Bill...He asks something but keep interupting to answer the question himself. Boring!!!!! Let Ron answer or else its The Oreilly Monologue.
fox is watched by many ignorant people that follow bill, what they need to know:Consensus isn't based on fact, fox is an evil corporate empire that wants to delute the truth (this is why they didn't lety ron on the last fox debate)
the government loves fox, or is fox idk. Ron Paul is going to cut the government in half which means more anarchy!!! xD \m/
It seems like since Ron Paul has gotten more support, he's gotten more forceful in his views, which I like. I saw a vid of Ron Paul on some talk show when he first ran for president in '88 and it was awesome. He really hasn't changed at all since then.
O'Reilly looks like a fool when he shouts down Paul by saying "we don't have time for a history lesson" -- and then continues to talk for quite some time. The truth: O'Reilly and his viewers - NEVER hear the history of American intervention in Iran going back to the 1950's. Paul's references to "blowback" are crucial and the entire point of what is going on. O'Reilly is clearly frightened of what Paul has to say here.
If you believe that yellinmg over someone and cutting them off rudly in the middle of expressing their thoughts is "winning" then you believe that OoooReilly "won". If you believe in reason, logic, and intelligence then Ron Paul shined brightly. As usual.
The history lesson Ron Paul was giving him is exactly what Bill needed to hear in order to make sound judgment. Notice how quickly Bill cut him off because he knew it would probably destroy his position.
I hate Bill O'Reilly and love Ron Paul. Usually O'Reilly sounds like a fool, and he still seems to ignore the fact that our foreign policy contributes to Iran's hatred for America. However, objectively, I think Bill made some good points, tonight.
I'm not so sure he made good points. He ignored the fact that the Saudis and Pakistanis are just as guilty if not more guilty in this terrorism business as Iran is. He said the Iran would produce a nuke quicker if we weren't there, which I don't see how that's even logical. And he pawns his 5 year prediction for the nuke as truth, yet the CIA is wrong about their 10 year assessment.
I think Bill, as usual, just used his voice and talked over Ron Paul.
So, O'Reilly's position is to keep kicking their ass until they stop hating us? I see a 1000 year war coming on. Either nuke the sand till it turns to glass or get the hell out of there and defend this country and stop trying to police the world. Sounds like Bill got his info from the same people that brought it to us on Iraq.
Thank you for posting this. I had hoped to see an exchange of ideas. I have no excuse for my naïveté. The Fox Network doesn't exchange ideas; they just talk over the guest until he gives up trying to respond. Zero information Bill. Nice job.
Paul *tried* to say that there are many nuclear, and pre-nuclear powers out there who don't like the U.S. invading and overthrowing governments. This policy gives radicals a stronger voice with those nations. We are *less* safe because of it.
O'reilly is the establishment's cock sucker
temudjin1155 6 months ago
I've recently come to realize that it really isn't the US's business to assume we are the only one's who can do anything about the problems in the middle east. No matter how bad it might be over there, we have to fix our own problems before we can give serious thought about help other nations with theirs. it will only get worse for us if we continue down this 'big brother' mindset. And other nations don't like it anyway.
wachman 2 years ago
O'Reilly's philosophy is who ever is louder wins and if the guest is louder, turn off the mic.
veganthrope 3 years ago 2
bush is a drunk
causeofmyanger 3 years ago
'if you keep living in this dream land that they attack us because we are free and prosperous...' BAM! oh i love this show for all the wrong reasons
lovesahoax 3 years ago
Ron Paul Owned Bill O'Reilly!
Magicguy15 3 years ago
Ron Paul's point was nuanced with historical perspective but O'Reilly is a bully. So--if you can't be right, then be loud and obnoxious.
icarusinbrazil 3 years ago
Bill... you are so small minded
spudea 3 years ago
Yep its Bill interviewing Bill...He asks something but keep interupting to answer the question himself. Boring!!!!! Let Ron answer or else its The Oreilly Monologue.
TheCresent 4 years ago
someone needs to put a fat penis in O'Reilly's mouth so ron can speak..
Ron Paul 2008!!
zelaznogeidde 4 years ago
what, put a fat penis in a fat penis, it be like looking at some sort of porn russian doll.
chrissteel1975 3 years ago
yeah, the only people I have seen actually hold their ground against Oreilly are Steven Colbert and Jon Stewart.
Itdrivesus 4 years ago
bill oreilly is the most damaging person on the air.
could you let someone, anyone actually answer your questions fucked up bill?
zilcher 4 years ago
How do you rate a video like this?
fox is watched by many ignorant people that follow bill, what they need to know:Consensus isn't based on fact, fox is an evil corporate empire that wants to delute the truth (this is why they didn't lety ron on the last fox debate)
the government loves fox, or is fox idk. Ron Paul is going to cut the government in half which means more anarchy!!! xD \m/
backlash420 4 years ago
Yes sirrrrrr!!!!
onblock7 3 years ago
O'Reily manipulated everything to make Ron Paul look stupid. Ignorant people like Bill O'Reily are the true demons of America
benn4 4 years ago 3
uggggggghhh......When anyone starts to speak the truth O'reilly cuts them off....What an ass!
Shyanna25 4 years ago
O'Reilly's an idiot. There's nothing to debate: America made Iran stronger by invading Iraq. No debate.
SpySlowhands 4 years ago 4
Einstein once stated "critizing or avoiding something without knowing why is a recipe for ignorance...
jake18274 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL O'Reilly may not be a fair source, But Ron Paul came off as a completely ignorant fool.
quinch1 4 years ago
Since when does Stating the facts and the truth make you a fool.. Those who dont listen to the facts and truth our in fact fools themselves.
jake18274 4 years ago
O.k. Let me ask you a question,
While I'm a [Ron Paul] supporter didn't this come to mind. "Rep. Congressman Dr. Ron Paul would be the last one to admit that "we" failed?
But he did!
Now wouldn't you think that Ron Paul would be, let's say a little more "privy" to that knowledge then a Fox News personality?
Just a question. -_-
masonexcell 4 years ago
Bill O'Reily is a stupid, evil man! He never wants to hear the truth!
feriacu 4 years ago 5
The Footage thier showing, It is not Iran!!They never go after the real terorist, witch is saudi Arebia!!All lies
Bill you are stupid man! you are just want bllod and killink people!
feriacu 4 years ago 3
Bill! Why isn't such an important "debatable" issue being truly debated?! Hiding something are we?
mintyman89 4 years ago
It seems like since Ron Paul has gotten more support, he's gotten more forceful in his views, which I like. I saw a vid of Ron Paul on some talk show when he first ran for president in '88 and it was awesome. He really hasn't changed at all since then.
sstearns34 4 years ago
O'Reilly looks like a fool when he shouts down Paul by saying "we don't have time for a history lesson" -- and then continues to talk for quite some time. The truth: O'Reilly and his viewers - NEVER hear the history of American intervention in Iran going back to the 1950's. Paul's references to "blowback" are crucial and the entire point of what is going on. O'Reilly is clearly frightened of what Paul has to say here.
Skere7 4 years ago 2
If you believe that yellinmg over someone and cutting them off rudly in the middle of expressing their thoughts is "winning" then you believe that OoooReilly "won". If you believe in reason, logic, and intelligence then Ron Paul shined brightly. As usual.
CaptainShays 4 years ago
The history lesson Ron Paul was giving him is exactly what Bill needed to hear in order to make sound judgment. Notice how quickly Bill cut him off because he knew it would probably destroy his position.
md6040vr6t 4 years ago 2
Paul rolls his eyes a bit at around 4:03 , hilarious, exactly what my reaction is watching Bill O'Reily.
jd603 4 years ago 2
I hate Bill O'Reilly and love Ron Paul. Usually O'Reilly sounds like a fool, and he still seems to ignore the fact that our foreign policy contributes to Iran's hatred for America. However, objectively, I think Bill made some good points, tonight.
benedictive 4 years ago 2
I'm not so sure he made good points. He ignored the fact that the Saudis and Pakistanis are just as guilty if not more guilty in this terrorism business as Iran is. He said the Iran would produce a nuke quicker if we weren't there, which I don't see how that's even logical. And he pawns his 5 year prediction for the nuke as truth, yet the CIA is wrong about their 10 year assessment.
I think Bill, as usual, just used his voice and talked over Ron Paul.
BlamePenguins 4 years ago
Corrections:
He said the Iran would produce; should be He said THAT Iran would produce
And he pawns his 5 year prediction for the nuke as truth; should be And he pawns his 5 year prediction for the nuke off as the truth
BlamePenguins 4 years ago
So, O'Reilly's position is to keep kicking their ass until they stop hating us? I see a 1000 year war coming on. Either nuke the sand till it turns to glass or get the hell out of there and defend this country and stop trying to police the world. Sounds like Bill got his info from the same people that brought it to us on Iraq.
jackdforrp 4 years ago 4
Thank you for posting this. I had hoped to see an exchange of ideas. I have no excuse for my naïveté. The Fox Network doesn't exchange ideas; they just talk over the guest until he gives up trying to respond. Zero information Bill. Nice job.
Paul *tried* to say that there are many nuclear, and pre-nuclear powers out there who don't like the U.S. invading and overthrowing governments. This policy gives radicals a stronger voice with those nations. We are *less* safe because of it.
VeniVidiVid 4 years ago 3
It's already too late, ron Paul 2008
jerseyg00d 4 years ago 4
Our own Government is the biggest threat to our national security. I only hope we can realize this before its too late.
AntiFed1791 4 years ago 3