@JamesRideout123 kent hovind is in jail because he lied and said that his creation museum was not turning a profit and was, in fact, a christian mission. He was found guilty of tax evasion. There is no such thing as darwinism, there is only darwin's theory of evolution and those who accept it as true
And then the US is baffled why our science and math scores are so bad: you have idiots that brainwash their children into closing their ears the moment they set foot in Biology class. Imagine the Banana Man in an AP Biology course.
@TheOkami1113 I CAN IMAGINE IT. In a corner atop of a bench, admiring the banana and slowly pealing it, while kirk is drools beside him, amazed at the wonderful smell and texture of it, with people around him taking pictures.
I always find it kinda funny, the obsession with the banana he has, i mean he truly loves bananas, guess this goes to show he ain't too distant relative of monkeys and chimps, the irony is epic i would think.
Kent Hovind is in jail because he was trying to warn the world that their is a dark agenda out there that aims at destroying the morality of every man woman and child making them into beasts. In fact Darwinism states that we evolved from mere beasts. God says you should hold your head up because you have been given free will by an all powerful all wise and all loving Creator. Jesus answered "Woe to them who worship the Created (Monkeys/Primates) rather then the Creator."
OMG you should have showed how they discovered from where the term ID came from! in the full movie they show that the original version of the book was written with the word creationist, and because the were so quick to change the books the actually changed the word with the word "intelligent design". in one of the times they made the mistake of deleting only part of the word and ended up with: "cintelligent designst" (the "c" at the beginning and the "st"in the end belong to "creationist".
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm what? It doesn't matter the context or what he said it to be in favour of, saying that DNA is more complex that a ny computer program we've ever designed is a pertinent statement and there's no fallacy in using it to support an argument about the complexity of DNA. I'm an atheist, but i totally disagree with Tf00t here. Anyone else agree?
@messakg123 > saying that DNA is more complex that a ny computer program we've ever designed is a pertinent statement and there's no fallacy in using it to support an argument about the complexity of DNA. I'm an atheist, but i totally disagree with Tf00t here. Anyone else agree?
No. Have people been writing code for a half-billion years?
@messakg123 Its not that its not relevant due to its being out of context, its the way they use it to make Gates seem like he is saying something he isn't. They use it as if the quote was originally meant to be in support of ID. To me it seems like an arguement from authority type thing like "Hey Bill Gates is a super smart guy!! And look what he said in support of our arguement!!"
@firebirdthecody yeah yeah i know i understand that the quote wasn't in favour of ID, im just saying that quote mining is only fallacious when they're not making the point that the quote miner claims they are making. Like the quote they use all the time from darwin about the eye. Here, Gates is actually saying that DNA is complex and that's all they claim that he is saying so there's no fallacy as such, theyve just applied it to a new context which isnt wrong.
@firebirdthecody ...cont. And yes i agree that its completely an argument from authority and a totally irrelevant quote. That is a much better reason to object to its use
@messakg123 they say :"DNA is complex, therefore God did it" which is VERY stupid.everyday we find more and more about DNA and complexity in general.And the fact that it's complex doesn't make any more place for god in science.
And you're objecting to premise 2. And i totally agree with you. But all I'm saying is that the bill gates is just being used to support premise 1 and i see no problem with that
@Panz82 No, Science and religon can not "work toghter" Alot of people have told me this and believe they don't know what they are talking about. Sorry but it's either science or God. ANd science makes MUCH more sense.
@85Damix; the act of taking a persons words out of context or using their words to make it seem as though they were saying the opposite or a differing view than was intended by the original speaker.
@Dubickimus Yes, because if you were a self-made billionaire owning one of the largest brands in history you would be sitting alone, in the dark, with a glass of merlot in your hand, wondering what a mindless-utterly stupid-child fucker has to say about you. Bill don't give a shit.
@NonnyMus1 Then how can the atheists delude themselve and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
@1tabligh ?? I was commenting on the fact that the radical activist School Board lost the case and badly. Sadly, Bosnell and Buckingham avoided being charged (and convicted) of perjury. It's also sad that the new School Board had to pay the judgment.
What does that have to do with the Big Bang and fusion products? Are you deluded enough to think they are the same thing? If you want to debate someone on those topics, go to Thunderf00t's first 3 videos in this series!
@NonnyMus1 What does that have to do with the Big Bang...
____
If you will still persist in your ignorance at least assure me as to when this *big bang* created itself-whether it did it before it came into existence, or afterwards?
If you say afterwards, your assertion is absurd. Because it is impossible for a thing to create its own self when it was already created.
The purpose of your assertion would be that the *big bang* made itself twice. It would mean that its first endeavours consisted in creating itself, and when it was quite ready and created, it created itself again. This is the most *absurd* and impossible theory-the acquisition of what is already acquired.
If you say that it created itself before it came into existence, it is really *stupid*. Because it was absolutely nothing before it came into existence.
How is it possible for a non-existing thing to create another thing (*big bang*) ? You consider my belief in an existing thing (God) that creates another non-existing thing (*big bang*) as absurd. But you do not consider your own, as to the non-existing thing having the power to create an already existing thing,(*big bang*) as absurd and stupid.
Be yourself the judge, and tell me whose theory is absurd and irrational.?
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth (Universe) were joined together as one unit (atom) of creation, before we clove (exploded) them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?"
@1tabligh I was once at a party before the 2008 Presidental primaries. A friend & I were talking about media coverage, when this guy walked up to us and yelled, "Exactly why do you think Rudy Guiliani is an asshole?!" We kind of made soothing noises to the obviously crazy man as we moved away. He apparently did that to other people because by the end of the evening he was all alone in a corner of the room and everybody at the party had their backs to him as they chatted away. You are that guy.
@1tabligh IIRC, the crazy guy at the party was a friend of the host's brother. The brother was a bit wacky, but very entertaining. He would tell great stories from his consulting jobs as a accountant at many of the larger companies in town. Things like how a major employer was paying over $200k/year in IRS fines because they had major payroll tax problems yet didn't want to pay ~$65k for the softtware package to fix them! Yep, the brother was very entertaining. His crazy friend not so much!
@420gma Then how can the atheists delude themselve and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
It amazes the lies IDers and creationist have to tell for their Propoganda. I think it is cos they know creation is a lie and that they're pretty much busted.
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
the funniest thing is that you can easily be an evolutionist and believe in God like me... i just dont believe every fucking thing that the church say me.... but i still believe in God
@Panz82 The funniest thing is that this isn't about believing in God at the same time as accepting scientific principle. It's about Creationism, an almost exclusive Judeo-Christian myth, encroaching on and misrepresenting scientific principle. One question for you though, You were pretty broad with "but I still believe in God", do you attach meaningless past stories to that conclusion and try to understand his intentions? Or do you make some up for yourself and think that sounds nice?
@Panz82 Character count stopped me from finishing the question, Or do you simply believe in the idea of a higher power that created everything somehow somewhere, he may be with you, he may not be, their may be an afterlife, their may not be. God without made up stories of his intentions that verify these questions is nothing but stubborn agnosticism.
@Panz82 Are you dense on purpose? I never claimed to hold the truth, in fact I even consider myself an agnostic atheist because I do not exclusively know, but I need the atheism title to state my position of refute on idiotic "word Gods" from the Bible and Koran. Where did that come from, "foundamentalism"? I'm not debating you on anything, there isn't anything to debate. You presented it like, "You're all stupid, at least I believe in both" like holding a position on both spectrums is good
@Panz82 As if it gives you a higher reasoning ground, when all it does is show how unable to arrive at a conclusion you are, so you mix theories out of all I can see to be, fear of a possible God. -Tw1st3dst33l "And so whats the problem with that" It's no better than the other people who believe literal fantasies written out in epic yarns called fables, oops, I mean Bibles.
@Panz82 Haha :D But really belief is a great thing as long as it's not fed to anyone. Congrats :) I myself just don't have mental "strength" to believe in any sort of god, even though I would want to. :)
@Panz82 I don't believe in god... well at least not god as described by religion anyway. Nevertheless, I could understand your position and respect it, unlike creationism which I have zero respect for.
@CamBlack92 and why? just keep yourself away from distraction....... creationist are a distraction + they keep thinking only the bible is the truth which is the biggest proof of their close mind... (sorry for bad english)
@Panz82 Why do you believe in god? I was amazed when my lecturer, a critical social scientist no less, compared her belief to my friend, who is a Muslim. Both believe in god and I have no problem with that. But when you are immersed in the scientific community, it seems almost beyond comprehension that you would accept something for which there is absolutely no evidence.
@Panz82 do u have any proof that god exists?cause there r countless proves that god is just a creation of mans imaginations serving many purposes like political power and influence money and pshyckological needs that had to be fullfilled and satisfied(example..comfort)
@AlexRaveloTV Without doubt, one of the factors in the emergence of anti-religious ideas and a phalanx of deniers of God, has been the false teachings, the inadequacies and the intellectual perversions of the followers of some religions. The peculiarities and separate characteristics of each religion must, therefore, be individually examined when studying the reasons that have led men to adhere to that religion.
@TomFynn How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
@1tabligh Because they don't make claims that necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe. You should probably look up the terms Hypothesis, Observation, Scientific Method, Unknown, Scientist. Your "list of unknowns concerning this very earth" is shortening itself through science every day, and as it gets shorter, people like you do nothing but interject that there could be an invisible entry on that list, that a higher power *somehow* interacted to help it along.
@1tabligh In short, How can religious people permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of every Religion ever deigned on earth,when their knowledge of the total scheme of written theology is *Damn close* to zero,when confronted with a whole mass of scientific and natural evidence concerning this very earth and tangible life and parts of the known universe? You crazy fucks don't even focus on real issues anymore,you just inject God where you can
@1tabligh I love this comment..it almost seems like you weren't just making pointless arguments. You just didn't go on to the part where "Individual examination and studies of what have led men to adhere to that religion" shows you just how stupid the religion is, how stupid it's fables and ideas are, and that's what led to the phalanx of deniers.
@b33p3rz Then how can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
@1tabligh "beings" is misleading how you use it. They go on to be the source of EVERYTHING, if that happens to become life, so be it, that's a different subject. How the fuck can you try and debunk logical science with terms like "decree the laws that regulate themselves" and then comfortably use "God decreed the laws of everything" to defend your argument. The laws that regulate them ARE them, the materials are what cause the "force", the interaction of which create things.
@b33p3rz How the fuck can you try and debunk logical science ...
____
So much "fuck" science for this brainless pseudo-Scientific Demagogue!
Your delusions that science has put out the notion of God is purely *rhetorical* and has nothing to do with logical method, because even thousands of scientific experiments could not possibly suffice to demonstrate that no non-material being or factor exists.
Your claim is nothing more than a *fanatical* illusion based on unproven theories.
Views such as these derive directly from a system of thought centered on materialism; within it, everything is defined and delimited with reference to materialism.
To interpret materialism in such a sense is in the final analysis strictly meaningless; it would be a superstitious notion involving the perversion of truth, and to regard it as scientific would, in fact, be *treason* to science.
Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim,
to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.
The atheist Delusion!
Some people try to propagate this *fantasy* in the garb of science and to present their choice as having been dictated by scientific thought. In the final analysis, however, the denial involved in such an assertion is unworthy of science and philosophy, and even *contradicts* empirical logic.
@1tabligh There are no decrees, or order applied, just stuff. Stuff that does stuff. Thankfully with our beautiful brains we can elaborate on that further, thank God ;D. 2nd comment - You're kidding me right? You're a fucking troll. "Western intellectuals were aware only of the superstitious aspect of false religion(I love that term, not only can you debunk science, but Massive theologies that you've never cared to learn about). Lacked all logical basis...LAWL. It uses the same basis as yours..
@b33p3rz Western intellectuals were aware only of the superstitious aspect of false religion and how the established dogmas of religion lacked all logical basis, so they had no hesitation in condemning religion as such to be baseless. Their judgment was based on their discouraging experiences with their own religion, and it could not fail, then, to be hasty, unrealistic, irrational and illogical.
A bunch of Christians lying and deceiving those they deem to be non-believers in order to get their way and advance their cause. Wouldn't that make them...Muslims?
I mean forced religion. Because the public school system is of the state and not of the church. If it's like, 15 people praying silently at lunch on their own, That's OK, they aren't hurting anyone. But the everyone in the whole school shouldn't be forced to pray. And not everyone was raised with a religious background.
" If it takes a little myth and ritual to get us through a night that seems endless, who among us cannot sympathize, and understand. We long to be here for a purpose, even though, despite much self deception, none is evident. We long for a parent to care for us, to forgive us our errors and save us from our childish mistakes. But knowledge is preferable to Ignorance, better by far to embrace the hard truth, than a reassuring fable.." -- Carl Sagan
Further proof that religion serves to separate rather than unite. And to beget really ridiculous, illogical statements with classically "great" grammar. :)
As much as i agree with you in the other points, as far as i am informed( plz correct me if im wrong) islam doesnt mean peace but obedience or something like that
Holy crap! Does the guy in the blue suit at the beginning have a ridiculously small head or what? He reminds me of a goomba from the Mario Bros movie...
Only thing that sort of bugs me about that case of the ID idiots trying to get it into schools is that at the end of the video it sounds like the district was forced to use TAXPAYER money to pay off this outlandish lie. He says there was no insurance to pay for their fraud and now the school is paying the bill for these morons, which in turn ends up being the community.
If creationism gets into American schools it will be very scary. They would become a theocracy within a generation or two.
I know they interfear with Canada now, but I don't fear them. If they became a full theocracy I would become very affraid and start to consider Europe or Australia...
@JamesRideout123 Awesome, I want to see him vs Hulk Hogan. As for Bill Gates, I am hesitant to ever knowingly buy a Microshit product ever again after hearing that they were donating money to the Discovery Institute. Supposedly it wasn't the section explicitly for trying to fuck over education, but that's still a bit fucked.
@KnightOFLight07 ya blame the media for telling the truth about islam degrading women and raising children to hide ieds under teddy bears to kill there own children!
Do u think I am degrading my mom,sister and my wife
HAHAHA
come on , why ?
And please dont say Muslims killing their children HHHHH because it does not make sense even
the degrading of women by make them naked in the front of TV screen for marketing purpose or let them work in the army when the men designing their underwear
@KnightOFLight07 women are not forced to be naked in the front of TV screens, and they do hide ieds that kill children your right that doent make sense, Do i think you are degrading your mom,sister and wife mabye not but it is happening
@KnightOFLight07 "let them work in the army when the men designing their underwear" WTF? they are in the army cos they want to, and what does their underwear have to do with anything?
Muslims don't do much of anything. Jihadists and Islamists are what worries me.
@KnightOFLight07 hahahaha..i thought religion was about forgiveness and putting ppl on right track not ENDING their lives???if god has such power y he doesnt just change the way BAD PPL think.. y is he playin games with ppl??y after muahmmad there hasnt been any prophet 2 guide the world?? cuz ppl got smart, they stopped fallin for con men, now ppl have science they ask million questions b4 believing. in old times all the creationists of 2day would hav been prophets they r such con men.
Islam emphasizes forgiveness and giving us excellent way to be good people and that is very clear if u compare a real Muslim behavior with any human in the world.
And who said Islam end people lives??
Islam is the Happiness and the peace of mind.
OK, now u talk about science , that is very interesting for me because Islam doesnt prevent the logical discussion so my friend did u believe in the Big Bang theory? or not
and how many scientific evidence u want from the Quran? to Convinced of Islam
@KnightOFLight07 Ive tried reading the quran but it has death threats against me on the very first page. I find it a very weird and hateful book about livestock. It equates belief with good and disbelief with evil, and therefore fails as a guide to morality. As for a scientific guide it is just as bad as the bible, with very vague claims that can only be interpreted as accurate science after the science is already known. The same goes for its "prophesies"
"Islam emphasizes forgiveness and giving us excellent way to be good people and that is very clear if u compare a real Muslim behavior with any human in the world."
Pretty sure you don't want to do that bro. Especially if you want to make a case that Islam is peaceful.
if u became a Muslim thats mean u believe in one God and Muhammad is the messenger of God SO dont then convert to believe in something else or worship yourself or the monkey theory or to be a slave for humans
I am sad to admit that I thought ID was an intelligently laid out theory before a friend of mine pointed me to the wiki article for this trial... le sigh...
The bitter tears I cried at my former ignorance...
The funny thing about intelligent design is that it displays all of the hallmarks of evolution - creationism had to evolve to keep up with vastly superior scientific knowledge, so it mutated itself into intelligent design, and obviously, natural selection had ID with more followers than old school creationism.
@Arkomonicus lol you should be happy youve broken the chains of religion, only the strong can do that when they stop wishing for heaven and start believeing in logic and reason
Were atheists there when the Universe began? Were atheists there when life began n earth? Were the atheists there when the first man appeared on earth? So, how is their irrelevant argument relevant? :/
@Airlightf That's not proof. That's making a claim. Proof requires evidence, not just a statement claiming to be fact. I can say the purple monkey sitting on my desk created the universe ten minutes ago, but without any proof to back that claim up it's meaningless. Show me the evidence. Go on.
Oh dear......Christians swearing on the holy book to tell the truth........and then lying !
MrHaggis03 1 week ago
@MrHaggis03 oh the sweet, sweet irony... it's burning.
linkuei83 1 week ago
@JamesRideout123 kent hovind is in jail because he lied and said that his creation museum was not turning a profit and was, in fact, a christian mission. He was found guilty of tax evasion. There is no such thing as darwinism, there is only darwin's theory of evolution and those who accept it as true
messakg123 1 week ago
And then the US is baffled why our science and math scores are so bad: you have idiots that brainwash their children into closing their ears the moment they set foot in Biology class. Imagine the Banana Man in an AP Biology course.
TheOkami1113 1 week ago 3
@TheOkami1113 I CAN IMAGINE IT. In a corner atop of a bench, admiring the banana and slowly pealing it, while kirk is drools beside him, amazed at the wonderful smell and texture of it, with people around him taking pictures.
I always find it kinda funny, the obsession with the banana he has, i mean he truly loves bananas, guess this goes to show he ain't too distant relative of monkeys and chimps, the irony is epic i would think.
linkuei83 1 week ago
Now that is a no-nonsense, excellent judge!
NoTroubleMikeG 3 weeks ago 3
Hey I had that textbook in the 4:52 shot. Jesus it was heavy.
Mustang424 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Kent Hovind is in jail because he was trying to warn the world that their is a dark agenda out there that aims at destroying the morality of every man woman and child making them into beasts. In fact Darwinism states that we evolved from mere beasts. God says you should hold your head up because you have been given free will by an all powerful all wise and all loving Creator. Jesus answered "Woe to them who worship the Created (Monkeys/Primates) rather then the Creator."
JamesRideout123 1 month ago
0:15 is there something wrong with the proportions on that man?
his head looks tiny and his shoulders extremely wide
FarhanC99 1 month ago 3
@FarhanC99 There's something wrong in his head. And yes, obviously something wrong with him physically too...
Soetman 1 month ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
This has been flagged as spam show
Conservative Christian Logic: /watch?v=UDBYGXWMAOw
csmcmillion 2 months ago
OMG you should have showed how they discovered from where the term ID came from! in the full movie they show that the original version of the book was written with the word creationist, and because the were so quick to change the books the actually changed the word with the word "intelligent design". in one of the times they made the mistake of deleting only part of the word and ended up with: "cintelligent designst" (the "c" at the beginning and the "st"in the end belong to "creationist".
lahav1 2 months ago
Ummmmmmmmmmmmmm what? It doesn't matter the context or what he said it to be in favour of, saying that DNA is more complex that a ny computer program we've ever designed is a pertinent statement and there's no fallacy in using it to support an argument about the complexity of DNA. I'm an atheist, but i totally disagree with Tf00t here. Anyone else agree?
messakg123 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@messakg123 > saying that DNA is more complex that a ny computer program we've ever designed is a pertinent statement and there's no fallacy in using it to support an argument about the complexity of DNA. I'm an atheist, but i totally disagree with Tf00t here. Anyone else agree?
No. Have people been writing code for a half-billion years?
csmcmillion 2 months ago
@messakg123 Its not that its not relevant due to its being out of context, its the way they use it to make Gates seem like he is saying something he isn't. They use it as if the quote was originally meant to be in support of ID. To me it seems like an arguement from authority type thing like "Hey Bill Gates is a super smart guy!! And look what he said in support of our arguement!!"
firebirdthecody 1 month ago
@firebirdthecody yeah yeah i know i understand that the quote wasn't in favour of ID, im just saying that quote mining is only fallacious when they're not making the point that the quote miner claims they are making. Like the quote they use all the time from darwin about the eye. Here, Gates is actually saying that DNA is complex and that's all they claim that he is saying so there's no fallacy as such, theyve just applied it to a new context which isnt wrong.
messakg123 1 month ago
@firebirdthecody ...cont. And yes i agree that its completely an argument from authority and a totally irrelevant quote. That is a much better reason to object to its use
messakg123 1 month ago
@messakg123 it's about the way they misuse this fact.
sinachiniforoosh 1 week ago
@sinachiniforoosh how is it misused?
messakg123 1 week ago
@messakg123 they say :"DNA is complex, therefore God did it" which is VERY stupid.everyday we find more and more about DNA and complexity in general.And the fact that it's complex doesn't make any more place for god in science.
sinachiniforoosh 1 week ago
@sinachiniforoosh Ok so the creationist argument here is:
1. DNA is complex
2. Complexity can only be explained by God
3. Therefore God designed DNA
And you're objecting to premise 2. And i totally agree with you. But all I'm saying is that the bill gates is just being used to support premise 1 and i see no problem with that
messakg123 1 week ago
@messakg123 oh, well that's okay.
sinachiniforoosh 1 week ago
@Panz82 No, Science and religon can not "work toghter" Alot of people have told me this and believe they don't know what they are talking about. Sorry but it's either science or God. ANd science makes MUCH more sense.
oOToStopANightmareOo 2 months ago
@oOToStopANightmareOo Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude!!! God Makes So Much More Sense! God dun it! :D :D :D
Nuerotronic 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Judge Jones is a good dude, great example of objective thinking.
RussianAssassin21 2 months ago
0:15 WTF WHY IS HIS HEAD SO FREAKISHLY SMALL?? creepy
Cheapshot420420 3 months ago
@Cheapshot420420 It's fine tuned to fit his brain....
Naddig74 3 months ago
6:34
You can hear a guy groaning in the background in response to hearing that the insurance policy had been canceled.
KajexFiredrake 3 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
Is it just me, or are the creationists in this vid LITERALLY have smaller than usual heads?
straighter100 3 months ago
well this is a war that will go on for ever...
both sides see the other as enemies, instead of looking into them and really understand what they are saying
I wonder, would you have a updated and correct book or would you have one that teaches the wrong thing?
both sides should learn to work together
I am trying to understand...
JFCocaColaJF 3 months ago
I fucking hate quote mining!
rampaginwalrus 4 months ago 37
@rampaginwalrus "I...hate...mining!" Dude, my Uncle's a miner!
HouseOfBrickOne 1 week ago
@rampaginwalrus
You say your "king ..ate quote mining"?
Jesus is your King!
:)
mphello 1 week ago
@rampaginwalrus what is it?
85Damix 4 days ago in playlist More videos from Thunderf00t
@85Damix; the act of taking a persons words out of context or using their words to make it seem as though they were saying the opposite or a differing view than was intended by the original speaker.
rampaginwalrus 4 days ago
@rampaginwalrus
rampaginwalrus has been quoted as saying "I hate fucking...!"
why is that, I wonder?
threeme2189 20 hours ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
I never get tired of hearing Judge Jones' quote that the Dover School board's decision was a move of "BREATHTAKING INANITY".
eastjones 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists? 24
I wonder how pissed off Bill Gates would be if he heard how they misquoted him.
Dubickimus 4 months ago
@Dubickimus If I was him I really would not give a shit, because I would remember I was the richest man in the world :)
NateXzX 4 months ago
@Dubickimus Yes, because if you were a self-made billionaire owning one of the largest brands in history you would be sitting alone, in the dark, with a glass of merlot in your hand, wondering what a mindless-utterly stupid-child fucker has to say about you. Bill don't give a shit.
Hoolygan4ever 4 months ago
I love it when justice is done.
NonnyMus1 5 months ago 3
@NonnyMus1 Then how can the atheists delude themselve and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
1tabligh 5 months ago
@1tabligh ?? I was commenting on the fact that the radical activist School Board lost the case and badly. Sadly, Bosnell and Buckingham avoided being charged (and convicted) of perjury. It's also sad that the new School Board had to pay the judgment.
What does that have to do with the Big Bang and fusion products? Are you deluded enough to think they are the same thing? If you want to debate someone on those topics, go to Thunderf00t's first 3 videos in this series!
NonnyMus1 4 months ago
@NonnyMus1 What does that have to do with the Big Bang...
____
If you will still persist in your ignorance at least assure me as to when this *big bang* created itself-whether it did it before it came into existence, or afterwards?
If you say afterwards, your assertion is absurd. Because it is impossible for a thing to create its own self when it was already created.
1tabligh 4 months ago
The purpose of your assertion would be that the *big bang* made itself twice. It would mean that its first endeavours consisted in creating itself, and when it was quite ready and created, it created itself again. This is the most *absurd* and impossible theory-the acquisition of what is already acquired.
If you say that it created itself before it came into existence, it is really *stupid*. Because it was absolutely nothing before it came into existence.
1tabligh 4 months ago
How is it possible for a non-existing thing to create another thing (*big bang*) ? You consider my belief in an existing thing (God) that creates another non-existing thing (*big bang*) as absurd. But you do not consider your own, as to the non-existing thing having the power to create an already existing thing,(*big bang*) as absurd and stupid.
Be yourself the judge, and tell me whose theory is absurd and irrational.?
1tabligh 4 months ago
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth (Universe) were joined together as one unit (atom) of creation, before we clove (exploded) them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?"
The Quran 21:30
1tabligh 4 months ago
@1tabligh I was once at a party before the 2008 Presidental primaries. A friend & I were talking about media coverage, when this guy walked up to us and yelled, "Exactly why do you think Rudy Guiliani is an asshole?!" We kind of made soothing noises to the obviously crazy man as we moved away. He apparently did that to other people because by the end of the evening he was all alone in a corner of the room and everybody at the party had their backs to him as they chatted away. You are that guy.
NonnyMus1 4 months ago
@NonnyMus1 Is it at all feasible to regard all the geometry, functioning and movement of the universe as the outcome of matter in its ignorance?
1tabligh 4 months ago
@1tabligh IIRC, the crazy guy at the party was a friend of the host's brother. The brother was a bit wacky, but very entertaining. He would tell great stories from his consulting jobs as a accountant at many of the larger companies in town. Things like how a major employer was paying over $200k/year in IRS fines because they had major payroll tax problems yet didn't want to pay ~$65k for the softtware package to fix them! Yep, the brother was very entertaining. His crazy friend not so much!
NonnyMus1 4 months ago
@1tabligh Nope ! Not really !
420gma 4 months ago
@420gma Then how can the atheists delude themselve and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
1tabligh 4 months ago
If anyone had tried to teach sunday school lessons in my high school classroom, I would have walked out.
bharper2011 5 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists - Thunderf00t
It amazes the lies IDers and creationist have to tell for their Propoganda. I think it is cos they know creation is a lie and that they're pretty much busted.
DavidNeff2011 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (DONATED) FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
the funniest thing is that you can easily be an evolutionist and believe in God like me... i just dont believe every fucking thing that the church say me.... but i still believe in God
Panz82 5 months ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
@Panz82: "i just dont believe every fucking thing that the church say me.... but i still believe in God"
Congratulations...you're only partly deluded.
mikefromwa 5 months ago
@Panz82 you just take parts of both worlds and make your own version. just fantasy then
Tw1St3DSt33L 5 months ago
@Tw1St3DSt33L and so what's the problem with that?
Panz82 5 months ago
@Panz82 The funniest thing is that this isn't about believing in God at the same time as accepting scientific principle. It's about Creationism, an almost exclusive Judeo-Christian myth, encroaching on and misrepresenting scientific principle. One question for you though, You were pretty broad with "but I still believe in God", do you attach meaningless past stories to that conclusion and try to understand his intentions? Or do you make some up for yourself and think that sounds nice?
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@Panz82 Character count stopped me from finishing the question, Or do you simply believe in the idea of a higher power that created everything somehow somewhere, he may be with you, he may not be, their may be an afterlife, their may not be. God without made up stories of his intentions that verify these questions is nothing but stubborn agnosticism.
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@b33p3rz and so? you think you're the holder of the truth? LOL
i believe what i want, but i m quite sure on something..... foundamentalism is WRONG
Panz82 5 months ago
@Panz82 Are you dense on purpose? I never claimed to hold the truth, in fact I even consider myself an agnostic atheist because I do not exclusively know, but I need the atheism title to state my position of refute on idiotic "word Gods" from the Bible and Koran. Where did that come from, "foundamentalism"? I'm not debating you on anything, there isn't anything to debate. You presented it like, "You're all stupid, at least I believe in both" like holding a position on both spectrums is good
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@Panz82 As if it gives you a higher reasoning ground, when all it does is show how unable to arrive at a conclusion you are, so you mix theories out of all I can see to be, fear of a possible God. -Tw1st3dst33l "And so whats the problem with that" It's no better than the other people who believe literal fantasies written out in epic yarns called fables, oops, I mean Bibles.
b33p3rz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@b33p3rz the difference between me and you is that i dont care a fuck if you believe in something or not
Panz82 5 months ago
@Panz82 That is the best possible belief, really. You believe in god, but not just blindly obeying every single rule the bible has to say. :)
LeeviON 3 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@LeeviON well i'm catholic and i follow just one rule, i dont want to hurt phisically or emotionally anybody
i think it's quite good believe... but i m a sinner cause i love women..... many :D :D :D
Panz82 3 months ago
@Panz82 Haha :D But really belief is a great thing as long as it's not fed to anyone. Congrats :) I myself just don't have mental "strength" to believe in any sort of god, even though I would want to. :)
LeeviON 3 months ago
@Panz82 just read your comment here, and we are alike in that matter.. just nice to see i have a fellow hybrid.. hehe.
anticholinergic09 3 months ago
@anticholinergic09 i m happy to see i m not alone in this world of crazy ppl....... :D :D :D
Panz82 3 months ago
@anticholinergic09 but what is your belief?
Panz82 3 months ago
@Panz82 Ace, champ!
Xanatos712 3 months ago
@Panz82 I don't believe in god... well at least not god as described by religion anyway. Nevertheless, I could understand your position and respect it, unlike creationism which I have zero respect for.
SeanACampbell 3 months ago
@SeanACampbell i have zero respect for creatonist.... it's like speaking with a muslim integralist.... same thing
Panz82 3 months ago
@Panz82 comments like this make you seem as unintelligent as they are.
CamBlack92 3 months ago
@CamBlack92 and why? just keep yourself away from distraction....... creationist are a distraction + they keep thinking only the bible is the truth which is the biggest proof of their close mind... (sorry for bad english)
Panz82 3 months ago
@Panz82 Why do you believe in god? I was amazed when my lecturer, a critical social scientist no less, compared her belief to my friend, who is a Muslim. Both believe in god and I have no problem with that. But when you are immersed in the scientific community, it seems almost beyond comprehension that you would accept something for which there is absolutely no evidence.
Pigroota 3 months ago
@Panz82 do u have any proof that god exists?cause there r countless proves that god is just a creation of mans imaginations serving many purposes like political power and influence money and pshyckological needs that had to be fullfilled and satisfied(example..comfort)
itachiitachi1946 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Panz82 Why do you believe in "God"?
Nuerotronic 2 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@Panz82 that's fine, it just makes you a stupid deist.
evilresidence4 2 months ago in playlist WDPLAC [Favorited Playlist]
@evilresidence4 you do not understand something.... you're the idiot trying to convince some1 else ;)
Panz82 2 months ago
wow i can not believe how far people will go to get people to believe in god to the point where even themselves know he can not be true
AlexRaveloTV 6 months ago
@AlexRaveloTV Without doubt, one of the factors in the emergence of anti-religious ideas and a phalanx of deniers of God, has been the false teachings, the inadequacies and the intellectual perversions of the followers of some religions. The peculiarities and separate characteristics of each religion must, therefore, be individually examined when studying the reasons that have led men to adhere to that religion.
1tabligh 5 months ago
@1tabligh Naw, it's not just "some". It's all of it. Because all of religion is bullshit.
TomFynn 5 months ago
@TomFynn How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
1tabligh 5 months ago
@1tabligh Because they don't make claims that necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe. You should probably look up the terms Hypothesis, Observation, Scientific Method, Unknown, Scientist. Your "list of unknowns concerning this very earth" is shortening itself through science every day, and as it gets shorter, people like you do nothing but interject that there could be an invisible entry on that list, that a higher power *somehow* interacted to help it along.
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@1tabligh In short, How can religious people permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of every Religion ever deigned on earth,when their knowledge of the total scheme of written theology is *Damn close* to zero,when confronted with a whole mass of scientific and natural evidence concerning this very earth and tangible life and parts of the known universe? You crazy fucks don't even focus on real issues anymore,you just inject God where you can
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@1tabligh I love this comment..it almost seems like you weren't just making pointless arguments. You just didn't go on to the part where "Individual examination and studies of what have led men to adhere to that religion" shows you just how stupid the religion is, how stupid it's fables and ideas are, and that's what led to the phalanx of deniers.
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@b33p3rz Then how can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
1tabligh 5 months ago
@1tabligh "beings" is misleading how you use it. They go on to be the source of EVERYTHING, if that happens to become life, so be it, that's a different subject. How the fuck can you try and debunk logical science with terms like "decree the laws that regulate themselves" and then comfortably use "God decreed the laws of everything" to defend your argument. The laws that regulate them ARE them, the materials are what cause the "force", the interaction of which create things.
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@b33p3rz How the fuck can you try and debunk logical science ...
____
So much "fuck" science for this brainless pseudo-Scientific Demagogue!
Your delusions that science has put out the notion of God is purely *rhetorical* and has nothing to do with logical method, because even thousands of scientific experiments could not possibly suffice to demonstrate that no non-material being or factor exists.
Your claim is nothing more than a *fanatical* illusion based on unproven theories.
1tabligh 5 months ago
@1tabligh Nope.
NonnyMus1 5 months ago
Views such as these derive directly from a system of thought centered on materialism; within it, everything is defined and delimited with reference to materialism.
To interpret materialism in such a sense is in the final analysis strictly meaningless; it would be a superstitious notion involving the perversion of truth, and to regard it as scientific would, in fact, be *treason* to science.
Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim,
1tabligh 5 months ago
@1tabligh Nope.
NonnyMus1 5 months ago
to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.
The atheist Delusion!
Some people try to propagate this *fantasy* in the garb of science and to present their choice as having been dictated by scientific thought. In the final analysis, however, the denial involved in such an assertion is unworthy of science and philosophy, and even *contradicts* empirical logic.
1tabligh 5 months ago
@1tabligh Nope.
NonnyMus1 5 months ago
@1tabligh There are no decrees, or order applied, just stuff. Stuff that does stuff. Thankfully with our beautiful brains we can elaborate on that further, thank God ;D. 2nd comment - You're kidding me right? You're a fucking troll. "Western intellectuals were aware only of the superstitious aspect of false religion(I love that term, not only can you debunk science, but Massive theologies that you've never cared to learn about). Lacked all logical basis...LAWL. It uses the same basis as yours..
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@b33p3rz Yep.
NonnyMus1 5 months ago
@b33p3rz Western intellectuals were aware only of the superstitious aspect of false religion and how the established dogmas of religion lacked all logical basis, so they had no hesitation in condemning religion as such to be baseless. Their judgment was based on their discouraging experiences with their own religion, and it could not fail, then, to be hasty, unrealistic, irrational and illogical.
1tabligh 5 months ago
whats the audio from at 2:25
nailo1 6 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
A bunch of Christians lying and deceiving those they deem to be non-believers in order to get their way and advance their cause. Wouldn't that make them...Muslims?
ChipArgyle 6 months ago
@ChipArgyle No
LuniaVideo 6 months ago
Damn right, glad to see the U.S. Supreme Court owning those creationist frauds.
NorseMariner7 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only time they admit their ignorance they happen to be lying about it. =P
angelwings1086 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"thou Shall not lie"
Nixom1334 6 months ago
God damned fucking insane cult savage crooks.
NotSoOldHippy 7 months ago
I wish I could be Thunerf00t.
xXx6TRACER6xXx 7 months ago
@xXx6TRACER6xXx You can be like.
FlyingSpaghettiMoner 7 months ago
"...and the giselle is gonna get it from the lion..." ahahahahahha
managarm1349 7 months ago
am glad they had to pay
letmeinnow22 8 months ago
religion should stay the fuck away form public schools.
jeg97256 8 months ago 23
@jeg97256 Religion should stay the fuck away. Period.
Xanatos712 4 months ago
@jeg97256 why?
JFCocaColaJF 3 months ago
@JFCocaColaJF
I mean forced religion. Because the public school system is of the state and not of the church. If it's like, 15 people praying silently at lunch on their own, That's OK, they aren't hurting anyone. But the everyone in the whole school shouldn't be forced to pray. And not everyone was raised with a religious background.
jeg97256 3 months ago
no religion has any place in any school. Teach the kids what we as a race have learned and then let them make up their own minds.
andysim232 8 months ago
I'm making a transcript but my english is not perfect... what does he say at 2:17? "Buckingham (...) in front of his church"
nikotina2003 8 months ago
@nikotina2003
"Buckingham had gotten up in front of his church..."
Ylts92 8 months ago
" If it takes a little myth and ritual to get us through a night that seems endless, who among us cannot sympathize, and understand. We long to be here for a purpose, even though, despite much self deception, none is evident. We long for a parent to care for us, to forgive us our errors and save us from our childish mistakes. But knowledge is preferable to Ignorance, better by far to embrace the hard truth, than a reassuring fable.." -- Carl Sagan
bonoboe 9 months ago
@bonoboe "Just give me a bucket full of Peyote and a Hang-glider." - Albert D. Xavier.
MrBeautifulba1 8 months ago
@MrBeautifulba1 Beautiful :)
bonoboe 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Copy and paste this in your youtube search bar.
13 Minutes on The Reliability of Scripture (John MacArthur)
Jesusisthetruth1 9 months ago
Lol @ religious debates.
Further proof that religion serves to separate rather than unite. And to beget really ridiculous, illogical statements with classically "great" grammar. :)
AeternusAnima 9 months ago
@Knightoflight07
As much as i agree with you in the other points, as far as i am informed( plz correct me if im wrong) islam doesnt mean peace but obedience or something like that
UliX29D 9 months ago
@UliX29D
no my friend Islam means in Arabic peace and the obedience in Islam must be to the God and his messenger (Muhammad) [peace upon him
KnightOFLight07 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KnightOFLight07 Islam means, "submission to the will of Allah"
MrSwedenik 9 months ago
Holy crap! Does the guy in the blue suit at the beginning have a ridiculously small head or what? He reminds me of a goomba from the Mario Bros movie...
Keiichi81 9 months ago
Only thing that sort of bugs me about that case of the ID idiots trying to get it into schools is that at the end of the video it sounds like the district was forced to use TAXPAYER money to pay off this outlandish lie. He says there was no insurance to pay for their fraud and now the school is paying the bill for these morons, which in turn ends up being the community.
Reip187 9 months ago 2
If creationists have god on their side, why is that they have to lie all the time?
Here4Years 9 months ago
I love how he never misses a moment to mention the Kent Hovind is in jail. :)
JackDavid6405 9 months ago
"ID is not science"
Simple, clear, and unmistakable. Keep ID out of science classes and stop these ignorance peddlers from ruining the minds of the future.
Casanuda 9 months ago
Here's a clever piece that I came across on religion:
Religion is like a Penis...
It's fine to have one.
It's fine to be proud of it.
But please don't whip it out in public and start waving it around,
And PLEASE don't try to shove it down my children's throats.
Christ...ina Marlowe
ChristinaMarlowe 9 months ago 198
@ChristinaMarlowe You also shouldn't make false statements about it or say yours is better than others.
bleblebob 9 months ago
@ChristinaMarlowe That is hilarious. You win a cookie.
fuzzydude64 9 months ago
@ChristinaMarlowe
WTF?
havee3333333 9 months ago
@ChristinaMarlowe ha, thats bloody good.
peuterschmidt 8 months ago
@ChristinaMarlowe my brother told that joke at Christmas with my christian grand mother in the room. LUL
jony1710 7 months ago
@ChristinaMarlowe that's the most epic quote i ever heard.
aj19bcx 7 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
@ChristinaMarlowe lol ur my hero if u came up with that quote xD
camelCaseFTW 7 months ago
@ChristinaMarlowe That's hysterical.
baatzu 5 months ago
@ChristinaMarlowe ha! how 'bout "My creationist is bigger than your creationist"
eastjones 4 months ago in playlist Why do people laugh at creationists?
If creationism gets into American schools it will be very scary. They would become a theocracy within a generation or two.
I know they interfear with Canada now, but I don't fear them. If they became a full theocracy I would become very affraid and start to consider Europe or Australia...
Silentsam7532 9 months ago
jamesrideout123 is an idiot. Dont be fooled.
-.-
rongdisk23 9 months ago 26
@rongdisk23 I see you've come across that idiot too! He's a tool! That guy is idiotic in ways we don't even know yet!
ahhhhjjjj 8 months ago
Thunderf00t is a NWO agent. Don't be fooled.
JamesRideout123 10 months ago
@JamesRideout123 Awesome, I want to see him vs Hulk Hogan. As for Bill Gates, I am hesitant to ever knowingly buy a Microshit product ever again after hearing that they were donating money to the Discovery Institute. Supposedly it wasn't the section explicitly for trying to fuck over education, but that's still a bit fucked.
mistereveready 10 months ago
@JamesRideout123 so anyone who beleives in evolution is apart of a new world order?
billybobboberson 9 months ago
watch my channel videos to listen the God words in The Quran about atheists
I advise all disbelievers in God to read about Islam because it is the latest message from the God to mankind after Christianity and Jewish.
you are fighting each other because you dont understand clearly the Islam religion
And that were caused by the media which attack the Islam in bad manner.
KnightOFLight07 10 months ago
@KnightOFLight07 ya blame the media for telling the truth about islam degrading women and raising children to hide ieds under teddy bears to kill there own children!
billybobboberson 9 months ago
@billybobboberson
HAHAHA
u are so funny ?
this is what I talk about exactly
this idea about Islam is stupid
Do u think I am degrading my mom,sister and my wife
HAHAHA
come on , why ?
And please dont say Muslims killing their children HHHHH because it does not make sense even
the degrading of women by make them naked in the front of TV screen for marketing purpose or let them work in the army when the men designing their underwear
KnightOFLight07 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KnightOFLight07 women are not forced to be naked in the front of TV screens, and they do hide ieds that kill children your right that doent make sense, Do i think you are degrading your mom,sister and wife mabye not but it is happening
billybobboberson 9 months ago
@KnightOFLight07 "let them work in the army when the men designing their underwear" WTF? they are in the army cos they want to, and what does their underwear have to do with anything?
Muslims don't do much of anything. Jihadists and Islamists are what worries me.
Crestote 9 months ago
@Crestote
Muslims do much of worshiping the God in the true way that is enough for us because we know who will be happy in the hereafter>
Also Islam means peace in Arabic so dont worry of Islamists if you dont want to kill them>
Also Islam prohibit killing any disbeliever if he dont fighting Muslims.
KnightOFLight07 9 months ago
@KnightOFLight07 Let me ask you this. What is the punishment for the crime of apostasy via Islamic law ?
Ethreo 9 months ago
@Ethreo
the death >>> why u asking this question ???
KnightOFLight07 9 months ago
@KnightOFLight07 hahahaha..i thought religion was about forgiveness and putting ppl on right track not ENDING their lives???if god has such power y he doesnt just change the way BAD PPL think.. y is he playin games with ppl??y after muahmmad there hasnt been any prophet 2 guide the world?? cuz ppl got smart, they stopped fallin for con men, now ppl have science they ask million questions b4 believing. in old times all the creationists of 2day would hav been prophets they r such con men.
chinamanspeakenlis 9 months ago
Islam emphasizes forgiveness and giving us excellent way to be good people and that is very clear if u compare a real Muslim behavior with any human in the world.
And who said Islam end people lives??
Islam is the Happiness and the peace of mind.
OK, now u talk about science , that is very interesting for me because Islam doesnt prevent the logical discussion so my friend did u believe in the Big Bang theory? or not
and how many scientific evidence u want from the Quran? to Convinced of Islam
KnightOFLight07 9 months ago
@KnightOFLight07 Ive tried reading the quran but it has death threats against me on the very first page. I find it a very weird and hateful book about livestock. It equates belief with good and disbelief with evil, and therefore fails as a guide to morality. As for a scientific guide it is just as bad as the bible, with very vague claims that can only be interpreted as accurate science after the science is already known. The same goes for its "prophesies"
TheMortalhuman 9 months ago
@KnightOFLight07
Quran=used toiletpaper
sonykroket 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KnightOFLight07
"Islam emphasizes forgiveness and giving us excellent way to be good people and that is very clear if u compare a real Muslim behavior with any human in the world."
Pretty sure you don't want to do that bro. Especially if you want to make a case that Islam is peaceful.
mko 8 months ago
@Ethreo
if u became a Muslim thats mean u believe in one God and Muhammad is the messenger of God SO dont then convert to believe in something else or worship yourself or the monkey theory or to be a slave for humans
KnightOFLight07 9 months ago
I am sad to admit that I thought ID was an intelligently laid out theory before a friend of mine pointed me to the wiki article for this trial... le sigh...
The bitter tears I cried at my former ignorance...
Arkomonicus 10 months ago
@Arkomonicus
The funny thing about intelligent design is that it displays all of the hallmarks of evolution - creationism had to evolve to keep up with vastly superior scientific knowledge, so it mutated itself into intelligent design, and obviously, natural selection had ID with more followers than old school creationism.
TheRyantherenegade 10 months ago
@Arkomonicus lol you should be happy youve broken the chains of religion, only the strong can do that when they stop wishing for heaven and start believeing in logic and reason
billybobboberson 9 months ago
Since the beginning, God gave permission to man to investigate earth,its depths, and the Universe.
Airlightf 10 months ago
Oh hey, Thunderf00t, feel free to use my example if you feel like it. It may prove to be entertaining.
NUTCASE71733 10 months ago
thunderf00t doesnt even need to say anything, just play the review of the trial, lol
Runningtail 10 months ago
Wait a minute! DNA is NOT like a software.
Airlightf 10 months ago
Were atheists there when the Universe began? Were atheists there when life began n earth? Were the atheists there when the first man appeared on earth? So, how is their irrelevant argument relevant? :/
Airlightf 11 months ago
@Airlightf No, atheists weren't there. Nor were scientists. Nor were creationists. What seperates the two is simple; evidence.
blue1085 10 months ago
@blue1085 I, was there. Said the LORD; and this is Evidence [pointing to Creation]. What do you say now, atheists?
Airlightf 10 months ago
@Airlightf That's not proof. That's making a claim. Proof requires evidence, not just a statement claiming to be fact. I can say the purple monkey sitting on my desk created the universe ten minutes ago, but without any proof to back that claim up it's meaningless. Show me the evidence. Go on.
blue1085 10 months ago