Added: 2 years ago
From: GERONAMI
Views: 495
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I think you are earning a lot of money! As you are converted from Hindu Tamil (DRAVIDA)? You speak GEO politics, civilization & Religion. YOU are still lucky that you reached USA in the name of GOD. GOD BLESS usa.

  • You're an idiot, is the library proposing something or just perhaps the books it contains?! idiot.

    When someone asks for a source, you give reference to that source i.e. this book or this person or whatever institution.

    Another point in fact, if perhaps you were proposing I look in some book (which btw you failed to reference), the book will no way be as up to date as the internet nor as easily and quickly accessible to all. You pratt.

    You didn't say why using wiki was pathetic.

    IDIOT

  • Why is using facts from wikipedia pathetic?

    If you have a different source proposing contradictory facts I would be grateful if you please forward the references

  • The next time you go there, do us all a favor by boiling in that steam and go to hell.

  • LOL

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Is someone getting angry? Whosaid that we created organisms out of non-living matter? Amino acids are the building blocks of your body, which we have proven to be possible to be created purely from natural means. Then brings forth evolution. Never did I say we can make cellular organisms. Oh and good job hitting the reply button for your reply to mine.

  • Comment removed

  • I haven't? Amino acids are the basis of living things. Without them we wouldn't be here. We have proved possible that amino acids can come through natural means. They are living molecules since they do a number of different functions, some essential and some aren't. Do you consider cells or proteins living?

  • Comment removed

  • who the hell said "without them we wouldn't be here" was a definition? Your response isn't really even a response and clearly the definition of alive for you is different than what it really is. Amino acids can be alive or dead understand the difference? They are alive as in they operate, they are active, and they exist. You are really being ignorant. Clearly something that is made naturally and can operate and are active are in fact ALIVE.

  • What I'm guessing is your definition of living is much different.

    Alive: 1. Having life; living. See synonyms at living. 2. In existence or operation; active: keep your hopes alive. 3. Full of living or moving things; abounding: a pool alive with trout. 4. Full of activity or animation; lively: a face alive with mischief.

    I'm sure we can both conclude that amino acids are alive then? They operate, they are active, they exist.

  • Comment removed

  • Oh and also they do in fact REPRODUCE faster than they die. That's one of the great traits of amino acids.

    "The amino acids in the experiment are NOT alive"

    Hmm, you have a lot of work to do explaining this position

  • Comment removed

  • WOW RLY? So have I so quit trying to brag when clearly I've explained this to the point a baby could understand this, I'm thinking now you're just being willfully ignorant. Did you even read my comments and see what would be considered alive? I'm guessing you must think whatever is leaving must have very similar organs as humans do, at least that's what you sound like. Everything you said at the end I have stated also, your being very circular.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • We evolved to be able to live with the given conditions. It's us that must work in a certain way to survive with these conditions not the other way around. You are rationalizing, you're saying "oh how beautiful all this is" while you're forgetting of everything that opposes.

  • Comment removed

  • Are you kidding me??? So many things ARE going wrong. Global Warming, famine, the list goes on.

    "And this is not even taking into account that life itself cannot be created from non-living matter."

    You do know that amino acids, the building blocks of life, have been PROVEN to spontaneously form under the right conditions? life from non-life is proven. And no, nobody is trying to disprove god since it's impossible, i cant disprove the toothfairy either, do you believe in that also?

  • Comment removed

  • a better word i should have said is abiogenesis, "theory on life from nonlife," is possible

  • Comment removed

  • HAHA wow, dude its been confirmed. look up the miller-urey experiment. and here also:

    watch?v=yet1xkAv_HY

    So I'm guessing all this is a lie also? As I've said before, life from non-life is possible. If you watch the link i just gave you and still say otherwise. i can't help you because then your just being ignorant

  • Pinche ngr, ni te ves! Did you see yogi bear? you´ll catch a cold !

    Self-realization means awareness of transcendental reality in three stages: Brahman or impersonal spiritual effulgence of the Supreme, Paramātmā or the all-pervading localized Supersoul, and Bhagavan or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Of these, all are eternal and beyond material consciousness but Bhagavan realization is most complete because it contains the most transcendental qualities.

  • Dr. Paul for President !

  • awesome video, beautiful country. God is so amazing.

  • Using that logic you could also say the sun is bad. The sun causes droughts, heatwaves, etc. Think outside the box and stop using wikipedia to do your debates.

  • I went to a reliable source which was accessible to all, I was using facts to present my train of thinking.

    The sun is a natural phenomena it has no power to control itself (in the context of determinism i.e. God) or the nature of things around it, the sun reaches its own equilibrium state and the environment around the sun also reaches it's natural equilibrium, this is seen in the form of droughts, heat waves etc

  • just a bunch of blah, blah, blah. You still haven`t proven that God doesn`t exist. Your line of thinking is good for a laugh.

  • It's not me asserting that a 'God' exists, it's the believers in a God or Gods asserting this belief, the onus is on them to prove there is a God or Gods.

    You havent given me any proof of your God thus I cannot begin to determine whether you may have a point or you're just a loon

  • The fundamental assertion to which I was replying to was that GOD was amazing he created Yellowstone but he also created things that were not so amazing like malaria, cancer, children born with disabilities etc

    Im all for thinking outside the box as you put it, but given no plausible evidence for a God if any I would have to either be so far outside the box that I cannot see it or that the box didnt really exist in the first place.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more