Minarchism/libertarianism is a self detonating philosphy. If you champion the non aggression principle as your guiding light (which most libertarians do) then you can not be for ANY laws or taxation.
Your either an anarcho capitalist or your inconsistent
@needtoalwayslearn Well i think that toms woods is excellent at describing the Austrian Economic philosophy, What's a minarchist? do you mean monarchist?
@88spammer Ahh, by "them" you mean the host of the program. I thought you meant Tom would have "destroyed [the host as well as Hoppe]".
Minarchism is a libertarian capitalist political philosophy. It maintains that the state is necessary and that its only legitimate function is the protection of individuals from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud, and the only legitimate governmental institutions are the military, police, and courts.
@AussieAustrianBlog Even if we live in Anarcho-capitalist nirvana: A private law society, there are still private security companies. And they work to protect their members/subscribers my use of force.
The only difference to a state sponsered security firm is that such a security system has a monolopy on the use of force, and will always protect the Government in cases that involve the government.
@needtoalwayslearn Incorrect. Firstly, in a private law society "anarcho capitalist nirvana" all exchanges are voluntary, that is, no use of force to join a particular security co. (unlike govt where aggression is used against me to join). Secondly, members are only defended by use of force in cases of self defence. This is ethical and consistent with libertarian principle. I fail to see how your comment has proven me wrong or of not understanding the topic. Quite baffled really.
Minarchism/libertarianism is a self detonating philosphy. If you champion the non aggression principle as your guiding light (which most libertarians do) then you can not be for ANY laws or taxation.
Your either an anarcho capitalist or your inconsistent
Equity213 2 weeks ago
Wow Wow Wow!!! Australians talking about the only way to peace, Anarcho capitalism!
jaminunit 2 weeks ago
Very interesting.
elstado1 3 weeks ago
They should egt Thomas Woods on there i dare them He'll destroy them
88spammer 4 weeks ago
@88spammer Why ? Is Tom Woods a minarchist ?
needtoalwayslearn 3 weeks ago
@needtoalwayslearn Well i think that toms woods is excellent at describing the Austrian Economic philosophy, What's a minarchist? do you mean monarchist?
88spammer 3 weeks ago
@88spammer Ahh, by "them" you mean the host of the program. I thought you meant Tom would have "destroyed [the host as well as Hoppe]".
Minarchism is a libertarian capitalist political philosophy. It maintains that the state is necessary and that its only legitimate function is the protection of individuals from aggression, theft, breach of contract, and fraud, and the only legitimate governmental institutions are the military, police, and courts.
See Wikipedia's Minarchism for more
needtoalwayslearn 3 weeks ago
@needtoalwayslearn Yeah sorry about my grammar and spelling. Ok will do thanx.
88spammer 3 weeks ago
@needtoalwayslearn the government protecting us from aggression, theft etc. when they exist only by engaging such acts, lol.
AussieAustrianBlog 3 weeks ago
@AussieAustrianBlog Even if we live in Anarcho-capitalist nirvana: A private law society, there are still private security companies. And they work to protect their members/subscribers my use of force.
The only difference to a state sponsered security firm is that such a security system has a monolopy on the use of force, and will always protect the Government in cases that involve the government.
Next time understand what you try to advocate.
needtoalwayslearn 3 weeks ago
@needtoalwayslearn Incorrect. Firstly, in a private law society "anarcho capitalist nirvana" all exchanges are voluntary, that is, no use of force to join a particular security co. (unlike govt where aggression is used against me to join). Secondly, members are only defended by use of force in cases of self defence. This is ethical and consistent with libertarian principle. I fail to see how your comment has proven me wrong or of not understanding the topic. Quite baffled really.
AussieAustrianBlog 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
needtoalwayslearn 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AussieAustrianBlog I misunderstood your use of the pronoun, "they", as refering to nouns in "aggression, theft, etc.", rather than "government".
Upon reflection it is obvious you were refering to the government.
Sorry about that.
needtoalwayslearn 2 weeks ago
excellent!
33Sergo 4 weeks ago
Marvelous. Who would have thought that the ABC would host Hoppe!!!
GMBCATASTROPHE 4 weeks ago
@GMBCATASTROPHE, yeah, a it is bit like Pravda hosting Milton Friedman before the fall of Communism.
LibertyDownUnder 3 weeks ago