The soviets thought James Bond was on that flight, in a spy mission, but seriously why didn't the pilot get close to perform visual recognition to see if civilian were on the plane before shooting down?
I guess the denial of the fighter pilot is a defense mecanism... if it -did- dawn on him that he actually killed 270 people, he would most likely break down.
@georgelei12 Iran Air Flight 655 occurred in the Middle East, during the Iran-Iraq War. There are 2 parties who could be blamed for that crash. The 1st is the Iranian Government (a dictatorship), which is said to have set up their own people The 2nd is the crew of the U.S.S. Vincennes; a.k.a., a bunch of paranoid idiots who believed IR655 was an Iranian Fighter Jet & not a civilian airliner.
@TheLastScion1 I have met and personally spoken with the skipper of the Vincennes. I can assure you, he is no idiot, nor was the crew paranoid as you state so flippantly. One has to look at the big picture.
@georgelei12 Still, the question remains - who was/is to blame for the fate of Iran Air Flight 655? The world may never know. Indeed, it seems that any Middle Eastern conflict the U.S. gets involved in - the War on Terrorism, for example - is, as they say, a "Sea of Lies". But that's my opinion. What's yours?
To all russians and Specially you GENNADI OSIPOVICH
NOOOO!!!! It was NOT a Spy plane and don't say SHIT about protocol because you goddamn russians don't respect that !!!!! and YESSSS!! you did MASS MURDER 269 INNOCENT PEOPLE ""GENNADI OSIPOVICH""..you PUSHED the goddamn red thing and that makes YOU a GODDAMN MURDERER..
I really hope that you GENNADI OSIPOVICH and your whole chain of command
4. Andropov was at power in Moscow; assuming that he was the guy who started to move Soviet Union direction Russia, the shoot-down could be used by him to show the military how incompetent it was... an to path his own way (which was briefly stopped by Chernenko but resumed by Gorbatschev)
This is awful story. So many lives lost because of a mistake...I hope this story from the past will teach us that any kind of war is just not worth it...
@thedayitriedtodie The pilots are supposed to be responsible for their own navigation. ATC won't tell them of their required course unless they are obviously heading WAY off course.
@thedayitriedtodie You have a point there, but the thing is (correct me if I'm wrong) that ATC doesn't actually know the pilot's exact route. The pilots file flight plans, with the information about their route, by themselves, so it's the pilot's job to keep the plane on course.
@ChristopherSaindon Ohh, you are sooo cooool, you are sooo brave, telling people ANYthing you want ANYtime you want on YouTube...just great, well done!
@Serdjo89 I do agree with you on the Iran Air incident, however you have to remember that the Soviets at the time were shifty in there behavior and they had a tendency to be overly secretive (as are most communist government). I am an American, but I think the Russian pilot acted appropriately given the information he had at the time and to be honest I probably would have done the same. He was given an order and he followed it. I certainly can't blamed him for still believing it was spy plane.
@craigdragon17 I agree with you. It's nice to know that there are people how are willing to talk about facts without involving emotional or political opinions.
@Serdjo89 I agree as well, the Iran Air incident was a bullshit move by us. For this particular incident, Korean Air 007, while I don't blame the Soviet pilot, I certainly do blame the people giving the orders that night. THEY should be the ones that are at falt. The pilot was just acting on orders.
@HittokiriBatosai you see, for the mission to be accomplished efficiently, what you least expect is usually the best alternative in order to deceive. Using a Boeing 747 could easily deceive anyone into thinking it definitely wouldn't be a spy plane when it actuality, it could, even though I'm not saying in this case it was.lol
@BABS7474 No air force has ever used civilian airplanes for spying. The high command on the ground assumed the Boeing 747 was a Boeing RC-135 reconnaissance plane because of its 4 jet trails. They were determined to shoot this plane down because of previous infractions of American spy planes. They ordered the pilot to shoot it, and he followed the order like a robot. The pilot was stupid, a monster plane like the 747 is unmistakable and can never be a spy plane.
@schizophrantic But the airforce pilot and his country could still have thought that the country who owns the airliner would go to any length as to use a 747 passenger jet to spy on their territory.Have you seen insects used to spy lately? Great creative technology.
Just because you know no country that has ever used a spy plane to spy doesn't mean it would never happen.I'm not saying it did or didn't in this case though.
@BABS7474 They didn't know it was a 747, so they couldn't have thought "that the country who owns the airliner would go to any length as to use a 747 passenger jet to spy." You don't make sense.
As I wrote before the high command assumed it was a RC-135 and they didn't take the necessary steps to verify it wasn't a passenger jet. Some modified passenger jets do spy, they are called AWACS and can be spotted from 10km away because of the large rotating radar dome.
@schizophrantic You lack understanding.How wouldn't the fighter pilot not have known it was a 747 or a passenger jet. He was flying right behind it at probably the same exact height, the 747 aircraft manuevered right before him to move to a different altitude. I can tell it's a 747 if I'm right behind one and wouldn't even mistake it for a A340. The point is that it didn't really matter to the pilot if it was a passenger jet or not.To him and those who sent him, it's just a matter of suspicion.
@BABS7474 I simplify it for you: pilot knows when he gets close; the command on ground don't ask/confirm/certify with him; trigger-happy commander is only concerned with aerial violation=destruction of the plane and orders pilot to shoot it down; pilot behaves like a robot.
Search for "Korean Air Lines Flight 007 transcripts" on google and read it if you have the time. At no time the command thought "the country who owns the airliner would go to any length as to use a 747 passenger jet to spy"
1)I think it is very simplified to say that the pilots don't turn the selector from HDG to INS.It is a whole process to setup and monitor theINS.It gives the possibility to check your track for drifting.More possible is that the INS had problem.2)In the interception the pilot goes side by side with the "enemy" aircraft and swing the wings so the"enemy" understand and leave or guide him out from the airspace,if they can't contact with radio.So I think they cover the maker & Rusians and all is OK
@etcpool they thought it was an enemy. I dont think itd be good tactics to radio and enemy trespassing your airspace asking permission to shoot it down
@etcpool yea i was w8ing for that moment on the video, but it seems there was never radio contact? wtf? they could'v just said something like "hey buddy , you're entering forbidden air space. you either move away now or you are going down." i bet the pilots would be scared shitless and make something.
but i guess the russians had made up their minds by now, so there was no turning back point. sad :|
@etcpool The Soviets perceived the liner as a threat. Not to mention there are hundreds to thousands of aircraft in the sky. At night, you can't see if the aircraft is a B747 or a B52, let alone see the aircraft's markings.
Even if they were to somehow magically get the plane's callsign and radio frequency, how would warning them help? "Oh, hello, you might be a high-tech reconnaissance plane, but I'm gonna warn you that we're right on your ass and we're gonna shoot you down, k?"
@etcpool The Russians claimed that they believed the plane was a spy plane and was in violation of their airspace. This would have given them authority to fire without warning. Even knowing the plane had civilians didn't change that fact. The truth of it is that they didn't care. It's not like games where you fire a warning shot.
@etcpool i dont think it would be good idea to radio to your enemy plane and warn them that you are gonna shoot it. it was a cold war era and russians probably thought it was a enemy or a spy plane. and more thing is usa had a military plane in the near airspace and i think they are probably knew that russians dispatch interceptors twice to that korean airplane. why they didnt do anything?
@saintex50 They probably mean usual geographic coordinates, but in order to make it more understandable for today's audience familiar with navigation systems in cars they call them GPS coordinates. Buy anyway, how did this navigation system in the plane work anyway at that time, before GPS? How did it find the waypoints, especially in the ocean? Can anybody tell me?
At that time (and still now) aircrafts use inertial navigation system or INS. You enter your exact coordinates at the gate before taxiing then each move (even a few meters on the ground) is detected by very sensitive (to any acceleration) gyroscopes and a computer displays the new position. The accuracy of INS is about 1 nautical mile after a 3.000 NM trip which is remarkable. INS depends neither on satellites nor on ground beacons. Sorry for my english (I'm french).
@saintex50 Inertia system is still in use for long distance flights, now the trick is with data entry at the gate. The story behind the 007 INS screw up is that they entered magnetic course instead of true and thus got the offset of five hundred km , I don't buy this crap.
Both US and USSR are responsible-
Us for sending a spy plane on a civil route
USSR for shooting the plane witout complete confirmation
Witherwings100 2 days ago
The soviets thought James Bond was on that flight, in a spy mission, but seriously why didn't the pilot get close to perform visual recognition to see if civilian were on the plane before shooting down?
VERGIS92 1 week ago
I guess the denial of the fighter pilot is a defense mecanism... if it -did- dawn on him that he actually killed 270 people, he would most likely break down.
ballebanan 2 weeks ago
We can see no excuse whatsoever for this appalling act. What about Iran Air Flight 655 shot down by the US Navy?
georgelei12 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@georgelei12 Iran Air Flight 655 occurred in the Middle East, during the Iran-Iraq War. There are 2 parties who could be blamed for that crash. The 1st is the Iranian Government (a dictatorship), which is said to have set up their own people The 2nd is the crew of the U.S.S. Vincennes; a.k.a., a bunch of paranoid idiots who believed IR655 was an Iranian Fighter Jet & not a civilian airliner.
*I RAN OUT OF ROOM; SEE MY NEXT COMMENT*
TheLastScion1 3 weeks ago
@TheLastScion1 I have met and personally spoken with the skipper of the Vincennes. I can assure you, he is no idiot, nor was the crew paranoid as you state so flippantly. One has to look at the big picture.
campy9sp 4 days ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@georgelei12 Still, the question remains - who was/is to blame for the fate of Iran Air Flight 655? The world may never know. Indeed, it seems that any Middle Eastern conflict the U.S. gets involved in - the War on Terrorism, for example - is, as they say, a "Sea of Lies". But that's my opinion. What's yours?
TheLastScion1 3 weeks ago
IN SOVIET RUSSIA, LIES TELL YOU!
theblacksheep1000 1 month ago
I like how they blame the pilots for this and not the soviets for fucking shooting it down.
AmpEnV 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
All i have to say is this:
To all russians and Specially you GENNADI OSIPOVICH
NOOOO!!!! It was NOT a Spy plane and don't say SHIT about protocol because you goddamn russians don't respect that !!!!! and YESSSS!! you did MASS MURDER 269 INNOCENT PEOPLE ""GENNADI OSIPOVICH""..you PUSHED the goddamn red thing and that makes YOU a GODDAMN MURDERER..
I really hope that you GENNADI OSIPOVICH and your whole chain of command
BURN IN HELL MOTHERFUCKERS...
francenys01 2 months ago
thanks for uploading
Georgeruby12 2 months ago
I don't care what that damn Rooskie thought--he's still a mass murderer.
diliosthegreek1 2 months ago
4. Andropov was at power in Moscow; assuming that he was the guy who started to move Soviet Union direction Russia, the shoot-down could be used by him to show the military how incompetent it was... an to path his own way (which was briefly stopped by Chernenko but resumed by Gorbatschev)
Seraph1967 3 months ago
Did anyone considered a possibility that Korean B747 avionics were fiddled with by Americans?
Accoring to the old latin rule 'cui prodest', they could have considerably gained from it (strategically):
1. Having RC-135 in the air, they could observe and spy-hear all the communications of Soviet Air Force scrambling theit jets twice in the air.
2. If the Soviets would shoot the plane down, they could show the world, how evil the Empire was
3. Able Archer 83 (see e.g. Wikipedia) was on its way
Seraph1967 3 months ago 2
the pilots make big mistake
efebasaran137 3 months ago
It doesn't look like is target destroyed where is the target then?
NoelCon100 3 months ago
Dumbass pilot.
Scitech101 3 months ago
This is awful story. So many lives lost because of a mistake...I hope this story from the past will teach us that any kind of war is just not worth it...
spacegirl13 3 months ago
why is there one dislike?
tommy124t1 4 months ago
and why didn't ATC notice they were off-course?
thedayitriedtodie 4 months ago
@thedayitriedtodie weren't you paying attention?? they were out of radar range.
craigdragon17 4 months ago in playlist More videos from aircrashuploader
@thedayitriedtodie The pilots are supposed to be responsible for their own navigation. ATC won't tell them of their required course unless they are obviously heading WAY off course.
MyVideoHubOnDell 3 months ago
@MyVideoHubOnDell
i agree, but they were quite off course, wouldn't u agree?
thedayitriedtodie 3 months ago
@thedayitriedtodie You have a point there, but the thing is (correct me if I'm wrong) that ATC doesn't actually know the pilot's exact route. The pilots file flight plans, with the information about their route, by themselves, so it's the pilot's job to keep the plane on course.
MyVideoHubOnDell 3 months ago
@thedayitriedtodie it was because flight 007 was out of Tokyo's Radar range, so he could only rely on what the pilots were telling him.
aabbii93here 3 months ago
@thedayitriedtodie Because they were out of ATC's (in Tokio) radar range. So the pilots could only verify their position to the controller verbally.
mirchik2 2 months ago
You Americans, just remmeber Iran Air 655, and don't say a thing!!!
Serdjo89 5 months ago
@Serdjo89 I am American, I remember 655 and I'll say any damn thing I want ANY time I want
ChristopherSaindon 5 months ago
@ChristopherSaindon Ohh, you are sooo cooool, you are sooo brave, telling people ANYthing you want ANYtime you want on YouTube...just great, well done!
Serdjo89 5 months ago
@Serdjo89 Damn right well done
ChristopherSaindon 5 months ago
@Serdjo89 I do agree with you on the Iran Air incident, however you have to remember that the Soviets at the time were shifty in there behavior and they had a tendency to be overly secretive (as are most communist government). I am an American, but I think the Russian pilot acted appropriately given the information he had at the time and to be honest I probably would have done the same. He was given an order and he followed it. I certainly can't blamed him for still believing it was spy plane.
craigdragon17 4 months ago in playlist More videos from aircrashuploader
@craigdragon17 I agree with you. It's nice to know that there are people how are willing to talk about facts without involving emotional or political opinions.
Serdjo89 4 months ago
@Serdjo89 I agree as well, the Iran Air incident was a bullshit move by us. For this particular incident, Korean Air 007, while I don't blame the Soviet pilot, I certainly do blame the people giving the orders that night. THEY should be the ones that are at falt. The pilot was just acting on orders.
airplanegod 4 months ago
@airplanegod I thought we got rid of the "just following orders" defense in 1946?
nccsa186 3 months ago
@nccsa186 The Russians certainly didn't......
airplanegod 3 months ago
For the fighter pilot to still believe he shot down a spy plane makes him a complete idiot. All the proof is there.
SoulKittyKat 5 months ago
Soviet union sucks
1shaneyeo 6 months ago
is anyone tell me what is mayday means or its like a emergance?
RKr894 6 months ago
@RKr894
m'aidez is French, means 'help me' and is pronounced like mayday, almost
garbidz 6 months ago
@garbidz ohh greatttt thnk u brother :)
RKr894 5 months ago
That Korean Air Pilot looked like the actor of JAL123(Correct me if i am wrong)
GalaxyMaster99 6 months ago
Typical soviet fashion. to them human life was very cheap including the life of their own people. communism was and is sick ideology
Lysy2 6 months ago
RIP all you 269 people who died. Totally innocent victims of a conflict which had nothing to do you with you.
Annon1100 6 months ago 3
Who would use a 747 as a spy plane??
HittokiriBatosai 6 months ago
@HittokiriBatosai you see, for the mission to be accomplished efficiently, what you least expect is usually the best alternative in order to deceive. Using a Boeing 747 could easily deceive anyone into thinking it definitely wouldn't be a spy plane when it actuality, it could, even though I'm not saying in this case it was.lol
BABS7474 6 months ago
@BABS7474 No air force has ever used civilian airplanes for spying. The high command on the ground assumed the Boeing 747 was a Boeing RC-135 reconnaissance plane because of its 4 jet trails. They were determined to shoot this plane down because of previous infractions of American spy planes. They ordered the pilot to shoot it, and he followed the order like a robot. The pilot was stupid, a monster plane like the 747 is unmistakable and can never be a spy plane.
schizophrantic 5 months ago
Comment removed
BABS7474 5 months ago
@schizophrantic But the airforce pilot and his country could still have thought that the country who owns the airliner would go to any length as to use a 747 passenger jet to spy on their territory.Have you seen insects used to spy lately? Great creative technology.
Just because you know no country that has ever used a spy plane to spy doesn't mean it would never happen.I'm not saying it did or didn't in this case though.
BABS7474 5 months ago
@BABS7474 They didn't know it was a 747, so they couldn't have thought "that the country who owns the airliner would go to any length as to use a 747 passenger jet to spy." You don't make sense.
As I wrote before the high command assumed it was a RC-135 and they didn't take the necessary steps to verify it wasn't a passenger jet. Some modified passenger jets do spy, they are called AWACS and can be spotted from 10km away because of the large rotating radar dome.
schizophrantic 5 months ago
@schizophrantic You lack understanding.How wouldn't the fighter pilot not have known it was a 747 or a passenger jet. He was flying right behind it at probably the same exact height, the 747 aircraft manuevered right before him to move to a different altitude. I can tell it's a 747 if I'm right behind one and wouldn't even mistake it for a A340. The point is that it didn't really matter to the pilot if it was a passenger jet or not.To him and those who sent him, it's just a matter of suspicion.
BABS7474 5 months ago
@BABS7474 I simplify it for you: pilot knows when he gets close; the command on ground don't ask/confirm/certify with him; trigger-happy commander is only concerned with aerial violation=destruction of the plane and orders pilot to shoot it down; pilot behaves like a robot.
Search for "Korean Air Lines Flight 007 transcripts" on google and read it if you have the time. At no time the command thought "the country who owns the airliner would go to any length as to use a 747 passenger jet to spy"
schizophrantic 5 months ago
Seeing them scream and bleed alot gave me chills somehow... ._.
MyAlen09 6 months ago 2
couldent the soviet pilot flied in the front of the enemy so if they could have seen him but nope
davvvvo 7 months ago 2
Comment removed
charlikesfunnystuff 7 months ago
1)I think it is very simplified to say that the pilots don't turn the selector from HDG to INS.It is a whole process to setup and monitor theINS.It gives the possibility to check your track for drifting.More possible is that the INS had problem.2)In the interception the pilot goes side by side with the "enemy" aircraft and swing the wings so the"enemy" understand and leave or guide him out from the airspace,if they can't contact with radio.So I think they cover the maker & Rusians and all is OK
basscos 7 months ago
danm you war
Draplax 8 months ago 2
"Korean Air 007?"
"Go ahead, Korean Air 015"
"...What're you wearing?"
gloomyoutlook 8 months ago 27
@gloomyoutlook XD
sammysosa2454 4 months ago
@gloomyoutlook Its What are you doing
lugonic97 16 hours ago
why didn't they radio to warn the plane b4 shooting?
etcpool 8 months ago 31
@etcpool they thought it was an enemy. I dont think itd be good tactics to radio and enemy trespassing your airspace asking permission to shoot it down
sammysosa2454 8 months ago 3
@etcpool yea i was w8ing for that moment on the video, but it seems there was never radio contact? wtf? they could'v just said something like "hey buddy , you're entering forbidden air space. you either move away now or you are going down." i bet the pilots would be scared shitless and make something.
but i guess the russians had made up their minds by now, so there was no turning back point. sad :|
druvik 8 months ago
@etcpool The Soviets perceived the liner as a threat. Not to mention there are hundreds to thousands of aircraft in the sky. At night, you can't see if the aircraft is a B747 or a B52, let alone see the aircraft's markings.
Even if they were to somehow magically get the plane's callsign and radio frequency, how would warning them help? "Oh, hello, you might be a high-tech reconnaissance plane, but I'm gonna warn you that we're right on your ass and we're gonna shoot you down, k?"
trollolololololo 7 months ago
@etcpool The Soviets shoot first then ask questions later.
DarthKieduss43 6 months ago 4
@etcpool The Russians claimed that they believed the plane was a spy plane and was in violation of their airspace. This would have given them authority to fire without warning. Even knowing the plane had civilians didn't change that fact. The truth of it is that they didn't care. It's not like games where you fire a warning shot.
darkyoda 5 months ago
@etcpool because the soviets sucked
pastelliazzurro 3 months ago
@etcpool they did
KangaKucha 2 months ago
@etcpool i dont think it would be good idea to radio to your enemy plane and warn them that you are gonna shoot it. it was a cold war era and russians probably thought it was a enemy or a spy plane. and more thing is usa had a military plane in the near airspace and i think they are probably knew that russians dispatch interceptors twice to that korean airplane. why they didnt do anything?
telmuun1221 2 months ago
@etcpool i like pie
customlego8000 2 months ago
@etcpool because they are bloody russians!!!!
09090888ful 1 month ago
@etcpool Warn them of what? That they're going to shoot?
What difference would it make?
TheMarlinspike 2 weeks ago
Thank You, Love your uploads sir, Keep Coming!! :D
dedeyun 8 months ago
At 18:16 "waypoints are GPS coordinates"
GPS ?? in 1983 ??
saintex50 8 months ago
@saintex50 They probably mean usual geographic coordinates, but in order to make it more understandable for today's audience familiar with navigation systems in cars they call them GPS coordinates. Buy anyway, how did this navigation system in the plane work anyway at that time, before GPS? How did it find the waypoints, especially in the ocean? Can anybody tell me?
harklompil 8 months ago
@harklompil
At that time (and still now) aircrafts use inertial navigation system or INS. You enter your exact coordinates at the gate before taxiing then each move (even a few meters on the ground) is detected by very sensitive (to any acceleration) gyroscopes and a computer displays the new position. The accuracy of INS is about 1 nautical mile after a 3.000 NM trip which is remarkable. INS depends neither on satellites nor on ground beacons. Sorry for my english (I'm french).
saintex50 8 months ago
@saintex50 Inertia system is still in use for long distance flights, now the trick is with data entry at the gate. The story behind the 007 INS screw up is that they entered magnetic course instead of true and thus got the offset of five hundred km , I don't buy this crap.
TheAngrybambr 1 month ago
@saintex50 It's been operational since 1978.
trollolololololo 7 months ago
This was season 9 episode 5
daverox007 8 months ago
Just checked and this is not season 7 episode 5 as operation babylift was
daverox007 8 months ago
what happened to the other missile
titanic5577 9 months ago
yeah thank you
jazzpilotman 9 months ago
Super quality video and sound. I really do enjoy these all-in-one uploads. Thank you...
fripouille69 9 months ago 5
Thanks!!
5IrFaN5 9 months ago