CONSTANDLY passing the collection plate for something people can do for FREE if they put their minds to it is a SIN!!!
GOOGLE should just rape him with a broom handle and slit his throat, and dump his corpse in the ocean!! THEY could run an encyclopedia MUCH BETTER than this dreamer!!!
Jimmy's anal rape and murder would make excellent internet tv though! and if he's lucky, his stalkers MIGHT give him a reacharound! he can GET OFF before he GETS OFFED!!!
i still don't get it. wikipedia has audio and video clips. i mean how huge of a database must it have and how much bandwidth must it consume? a lotta money to cover that shit.
Thank mr. Jimmy wales for your outstanding contribution to the world. we are very much helpful through your site. we appreciate for your super creation. specially Non-organization on the internet world. God bless you...
shame! you just said it! you now have for profit wiki, yet you just ended your "non-profit" fundraiser.where did the money go? i do know you managed to ruin a perfectly fine, easily navigable site, that i will never use again. where did my money go jimmy? i will never donate online again. hey, maybe they'll make a movie about you just like that facebook guy, a non-profit movie. right!
He said his other project, Wikia, just profited, not Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia and is non-profit, running on donations, while Wikia is advertised based and is for topical encyclopedias, such as tv shows and the like.
KingCast: OK here's the Nashua Telegraph, Wiki says it's the second-largest paper in NH (27,000 daily, and 34,000 on Sunday)
Wiki: Hey King you misquoted the account.
KingCast: OK, here's direct quotes showing that I spoke to Kelly Ayotte and the Police had me escorted out after she refused to acknowledge my presence.
Wiki: Hey King that's not good enough either, you have no proof she knew about the litigation.
I kind of feel sorry for the companies that used to and still sell encyclopedias, like britannica. They have absolutely no chance of surviving a free and larger encyclopedia.
Comparison of articles about the two:
Britannica says:
about "Britannica": almost 2000 words;
about "Wikipedia": almost 1000.
Wikipedia has:
article "Britannica": over 7500 (& featured article);
article "Wikipedia": almost 8000 words.
So the best place to learn about britannica is still wikipedia... RIP britannica :(
1) Jimmy Wales is a Southerner from Alabama. That's right, he is from the same Neanderthal ilk that fought, bled, and died to keep black people in chains and who regard rape and castration of people different from them as their moral duty. 2) Jimmy Wales is an Objectivist, also known as a Randroid, which means he is a robotic member of the Ayn Rand cult. 3) Wikipedia is an idiotic idea. Vandalism and accuracy mingle on every page.
@diakr0n: You fucking asshole moron! You think the Civil War was just about slavery? You call Southerners Neanderthals. Can you call Black people Neanderthals? No? Then who are the real victims of prejudice?
Wikipedia is a great source of information and the only reason teachers don't want us to use it is because we would have all the information we need in just one place and we wouldn't have to do any other research. Wikipedia can be edited by people but the information is accurate.
But you must check the sources of info in the footnotes. Sometimes the cited sources can be totally unreliable. Don't take it for granted that the editor has good references.
Yes, but you can't be set on one thing, you must ALWAYS question things...and never believe anythig without reliable proof, yes you can check wikipedia but it's good to confirm everything that is of importance
You should try reading any academic reference library. One of my fields of expertise is audio, and the kind of misleading stuff you'll find in their AES academic library from the 1960s, some of it has had me rolling around on the floor.
But that's what's cool about academia and not so cool about wikipedia. Academia keeps the wrong answers intact. It's a different thing.
@02browns actually I've tried but the process is beyond me. It comes down to what the majority thinks is right. Despite recent discoveries the old beliefs die hard.
@02browns Very true, I've seen deliberate vandalism on ONE page, I reopened the page about 5 minutes later and the vandalism was erased. I've seen about 3 spelling mistakes altogether, which I corrected. It's the best encyclopedia on the planet!
This makes me want to go and edit Stephen Colbert's page, "YOU FUCCKIN LOSER!! LEAVE JIMMY WALES ALONE!" And cause' he is so vain and stupid-headed he checks it every second thinking "I am so cool, I'm on wikipedia" so he will see and be like D:
Wikipedia is certain one of the most impressive ideas to pop out of the internet. I love that it promotes the interest in the concept of verifiability. It is sad when one utilizes a single source claiming 'it must be true, it's written'. Citation is provided in Wikipedia offsite to point other sources and therefore more complete and separate sources; its a link page of interest by interested parties bringing unconfirmed but dynamically verifiable focus to a modern age of information overload.
Most wikipedia articles have many references that can be tracked down, not to mention further research sections. It isn't always complete, but wikipedia is a good way to get info together quickly, due to how much gets compiled right away.
Should I even mention how easy it is to get a publisher to let you publish a book? Some publishers check their content less than wikipedia does, which is pretty insane. Any information that is incorrect can be double checked by cross-reference.
@TKGB2006 I know, i just liek the site because it's got a lot of cruel jokes and it's name was based off wikipedia, like wikipedia, it features thousands apon thousnads of things, wikipedia can tell you science, history etc, sickipedia can tell you jokes about deaf people and make funny cracks at recent event's they have a simalar base, but wikipedia is consturctive
I just re-subscribed Rocketboom to keep track of her interviews. She gives this shorts some kind of sweetness and freshness which makes one's day a lot better. Good work and thanks for interviewing Jimmy.
He's a bit of a candy-ass for believing roody-poos can write a comprehensive encyclopedia.
funkgerat 2 weeks ago
THIS FOOL WILL PAY FOR HIS SINS!!!!!
CONSTANDLY passing the collection plate for something people can do for FREE if they put their minds to it is a SIN!!!
GOOGLE should just rape him with a broom handle and slit his throat, and dump his corpse in the ocean!! THEY could run an encyclopedia MUCH BETTER than this dreamer!!!
Jimmy's anal rape and murder would make excellent internet tv though! and if he's lucky, his stalkers MIGHT give him a reacharound! he can GET OFF before he GETS OFFED!!!
RodMunch247 1 month ago
i still don't get it. wikipedia has audio and video clips. i mean how huge of a database must it have and how much bandwidth must it consume? a lotta money to cover that shit.
halflifeproductionz 1 month ago
This guy is a fag. How do you think he lives? Donating to this greedy ass is the same as donating to a bank CEO
SOLIDSNAKEXXX360 1 month ago
Thank you, Jimmy, for creating something that is more amazing than every other service out there on the net - while humbly asking for donations only.
I will donate real soon - I promise! The $20 I will send is nothing compared to the knowledge I have learned!
impreprex1979 1 month ago
Thank mr. Jimmy wales for your outstanding contribution to the world. we are very much helpful through your site. we appreciate for your super creation. specially Non-organization on the internet world. God bless you...
saifunited 2 months ago
I hate this guy
ministryhellie 2 months ago
Man, I'm disappointed. I expected this guy to have a deep voice and a British accent.
BigDogJang0 2 months ago
@BigDogJang0 Why?
Geophrie39 2 months ago
@Geophrie39
I don't know. That's just what I imagined when I saw photos of him.
BigDogJang0 2 months ago
This really helps me with my presentation for school:) Thnx
Mariep0z 4 months ago
I would have never pronounced Wikia that way.
dex208 8 months ago
shame! you just said it! you now have for profit wiki, yet you just ended your "non-profit" fundraiser.where did the money go? i do know you managed to ruin a perfectly fine, easily navigable site, that i will never use again. where did my money go jimmy? i will never donate online again. hey, maybe they'll make a movie about you just like that facebook guy, a non-profit movie. right!
coldscorpio619 1 year ago
@coldscorpio619
He said his other project, Wikia, just profited, not Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia and is non-profit, running on donations, while Wikia is advertised based and is for topical encyclopedias, such as tv shows and the like.
The two are not the same.
wowthatsweird 8 months ago
Wi-key-a? I thought it was wickey-a. I'm crushed. :-(
TheGravitationist 1 year ago
omg hes hot :O
cookiescreambs 1 year ago
Jimmy is going to put everyone on wiki even that red haired woman D:
darkangelcloud7 1 year ago
Long Live Wikipedia!!!!!!!!!!!!
chris9380 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wiki: Hey King go get a newspaper account.
KingCast: OK here's the Nashua Telegraph, Wiki says it's the second-largest paper in NH (27,000 daily, and 34,000 on Sunday)
Wiki: Hey King you misquoted the account.
KingCast: OK, here's direct quotes showing that I spoke to Kelly Ayotte and the Police had me escorted out after she refused to acknowledge my presence.
Wiki: Hey King that's not good enough either, you have no proof she knew about the litigation.
KingCast: You guys are scum
KingCast65 1 year ago
Watch this video at KingCast65 Channel
Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia = bought & sold hypocrites who cannot be trusted
KingCast65 1 year ago
I kind of feel sorry for the companies that used to and still sell encyclopedias, like britannica. They have absolutely no chance of surviving a free and larger encyclopedia.
Comparison of articles about the two:
Britannica says:
about "Britannica": almost 2000 words;
about "Wikipedia": almost 1000.
Wikipedia has:
article "Britannica": over 7500 (& featured article);
article "Wikipedia": almost 8000 words.
So the best place to learn about britannica is still wikipedia... RIP britannica :(
pcdsgh 1 year ago 4
@pcdsgh Aahhh, Britannica... Another excellent world famous British idea that was taken over and destroyed by the Americans.... R.I.P indeed :(
MissydMCR 1 year ago
@MissydMCR:
You mean democratized and improved by Americans... Right?
Mujangga 8 months ago
Comment removed
pcdsgh 1 year ago
Comment removed
pcdsgh 1 year ago
Comment removed
pcdsgh 1 year ago
what a clump
lemonsandshii 1 year ago
Is it just me, or does he look strikingly like chuck norris?
InsertNameWhere 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if they had ads they would lose 5013c tax exempt status...
spencertron88 1 year ago
thanks for making our lifes Easier Jimbo
MasterpieceMusicHM 1 year ago
I already donate some money, he really deserve it, it's a great job he's doing, I use wikipedia ALL THE TIME!
Thanks Jimmy Wales!
derrenvictorbrown 1 year ago 2
Ban Wikipedia
thepetitionsitdotcom/1/ban-wikipedia/
16neelloc 1 year ago
1) Jimmy Wales is a Southerner from Alabama. That's right, he is from the same Neanderthal ilk that fought, bled, and died to keep black people in chains and who regard rape and castration of people different from them as their moral duty. 2) Jimmy Wales is an Objectivist, also known as a Randroid, which means he is a robotic member of the Ayn Rand cult. 3) Wikipedia is an idiotic idea. Vandalism and accuracy mingle on every page.
diakr0n 1 year ago
@diakr0n: You fucking asshole moron! You think the Civil War was just about slavery? You call Southerners Neanderthals. Can you call Black people Neanderthals? No? Then who are the real victims of prejudice?
Mujangga 8 months ago
I use wikipedia all the time, its the best thing ever, and I would gladly donate money but I dont have any , lol
smilingasteroid 1 year ago 3
Jimmmyyyyyyy!!!!
RebelHQ 2 years ago
I love Jimmy Wales, I hope he gets the money he needs to carry on with Wikipedia. Personally, I will donate money
talioson1945 2 years ago 3
He's a cool guy. And a visionary .
tickman2 2 years ago 10
Wikipedia is a great source of information and the only reason teachers don't want us to use it is because we would have all the information we need in just one place and we wouldn't have to do any other research. Wikipedia can be edited by people but the information is accurate.
RethParish 2 years ago 4
But you must check the sources of info in the footnotes. Sometimes the cited sources can be totally unreliable. Don't take it for granted that the editor has good references.
victoriabagpiper 2 years ago 3
Yes, but you can't be set on one thing, you must ALWAYS question things...and never believe anythig without reliable proof, yes you can check wikipedia but it's good to confirm everything that is of importance
sebastal 2 years ago
@victoriabagpiper
You should try reading any academic reference library. One of my fields of expertise is audio, and the kind of misleading stuff you'll find in their AES academic library from the 1960s, some of it has had me rolling around on the floor.
But that's what's cool about academia and not so cool about wikipedia. Academia keeps the wrong answers intact. It's a different thing.
Don't just believe anything you read!!!
bishopdante 1 year ago
i think the reason why teachers don't allow us to use wikipedia is that it's too convenient, it's too good
3doog 2 years ago 2
I HATE when people, like teachers, say Wikipedia can be false and filled with lies or something like that :(
My teachers say don't use it for reports, but i always do ^_^
xXTobiUchihaXx 2 years ago 4
Why do you hate the truth?
igykalen 2 years ago
What you could do, is make sure to refer to the references in the wikipedia articles, since Wikipedia doesn't allow original research.
Gyrode 2 years ago
Yeah, they always say "it's full of mistakes on every page!" I've spotted 2 mistakes ever, both spelling mistakes, which i then corrected.
Wikipedia > School
02browns 2 years ago 36
You get a thumb up from me.
TKGB2006 2 years ago 3
I totally agree ^^
nriab23 2 years ago 2
@02browns I find a lot of inaccuracies and misconceptions presented on wikipedia.
rosswoof 1 year ago
@rosswoof and the beauty is that you can correct them :)
02browns 1 year ago
@02browns actually I've tried but the process is beyond me. It comes down to what the majority thinks is right. Despite recent discoveries the old beliefs die hard.
rosswoof 1 year ago
@02browns Very true, I've seen deliberate vandalism on ONE page, I reopened the page about 5 minutes later and the vandalism was erased. I've seen about 3 spelling mistakes altogether, which I corrected. It's the best encyclopedia on the planet!
yellowmetalcyborg 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol i just draw an ascii dick in wikipedia
locomotive147 2 years ago
my hero
5600981 2 years ago 3
This makes me want to go and edit Stephen Colbert's page, "YOU FUCCKIN LOSER!! LEAVE JIMMY WALES ALONE!" And cause' he is so vain and stupid-headed he checks it every second thinking "I am so cool, I'm on wikipedia" so he will see and be like D:
MUWHAHAHAHHA
But I won't cause' that would be immature...
Z0MGCODY 2 years ago
Jimmy Wales is a hero! He clearly read the Foundation series by Isaac Asimov as a kid! :D
TimTrimT 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Chulacker 2 years ago
Very nice outfit Ella!
NickTechFilms 2 years ago
wikipedia rocks!!
DAWNCB 2 years ago
lies, all lies!
I, found wikipedia first. ME.
come on people this guy can't even afford collars.
ALL my shirts have collars.
Raskolnikov32 2 years ago 2
hahaha
ToMyDearestFreak 2 years ago
I remember when Obama's wiki page was covered with the writing NIIIIGGGER.
Internetz, you're so immature.
ColRon 2 years ago 2
such sexual tension in this video
eugenethelamb 2 years ago 2
HAHA
hellokittycuddleclub 2 years ago
My balls are feeling very heavy. Let me rest them on your forehead.
ShittyNipples 2 years ago
fuck you
shfbdfi1273 2 years ago
O_o your balls are feeling very hard.....i think you need to see the doctor you may have testicular cancer
eSilva90 2 years ago
Comment removed
freeman22223 2 years ago
Comment removed
freeman22223 2 years ago
anytime people edit something on wikipedia with false information, it is surprising just how fast that info gets changed.
TheT4xid3rmist 2 years ago 2
i luv wikipadie. halpz me cheet on meh test.
Just kidding. I'm not that dumb. I do learn something from Wikipedia. LOL
bks1366 2 years ago
Stinks that my teacher doesnt let me use wiki as a sourse, at least i can just go to the refference sites at the bottom ;)
clankbot9 2 years ago 22
Comment removed
freeman22223 2 years ago 2
@clankbot9 My English teacher was afraid of that! Haha!
swtxwishes 1 year ago
EXCUSE ME... did he insult the youtube community. the true youtube community has done amazing things for each other. we are a real community
goingforthegold 2 years ago 2
Wikipedia is certain one of the most impressive ideas to pop out of the internet. I love that it promotes the interest in the concept of verifiability. It is sad when one utilizes a single source claiming 'it must be true, it's written'. Citation is provided in Wikipedia offsite to point other sources and therefore more complete and separate sources; its a link page of interest by interested parties bringing unconfirmed but dynamically verifiable focus to a modern age of information overload.
PariahOlympics 2 years ago
That's a very nice description you got there. ;]
CirqueDuCloud 2 years ago
Nice work Ella.
duplicatehelix 2 years ago
I like her Accent.
4deeb 2 years ago
Most wikipedia articles have many references that can be tracked down, not to mention further research sections. It isn't always complete, but wikipedia is a good way to get info together quickly, due to how much gets compiled right away.
Should I even mention how easy it is to get a publisher to let you publish a book? Some publishers check their content less than wikipedia does, which is pretty insane. Any information that is incorrect can be double checked by cross-reference.
shadowhamster 2 years ago 4
I always laugh when someone says "That's what it says on wikipedia."
hardworker424 2 years ago
GO ELMO....that was the best...do it again. this one you are doing is boring.
foxyoxy21 2 years ago
He should have ironed his shirt
johnnyheretic06 2 years ago
*Random useless comment*
RgSchmitt 2 years ago
Nice.
rahidelvi 2 years ago
Encyclopedia Dramatica. Like wikipedia only fucking awesome and not lame.
Robotfan987 2 years ago 2
...
WizardShiz 2 years ago
And extremely saddening.
SgtLion 2 years ago
and full of porn.
TKGB2006 2 years ago
my teachers don't let me use wikipedia as a source
eSilva90 2 years ago
the easy way around that is to just cite the sources that wiki has at the bottom of most their articles.
charlieclown 2 years ago 2
@eSilva90 Cause people can post what they want and it can be all nonsense
heero854 2 years ago
Wickipedia rules but i think sickipedia rules more, it's a real website in case your new to sickipedia.
TheMegaJet 2 years ago
Sickipedia is about jokes, not articles.
TKGB2006 2 years ago
@TKGB2006 I know, i just liek the site because it's got a lot of cruel jokes and it's name was based off wikipedia, like wikipedia, it features thousands apon thousnads of things, wikipedia can tell you science, history etc, sickipedia can tell you jokes about deaf people and make funny cracks at recent event's they have a simalar base, but wikipedia is consturctive
TheMegaJet 2 years ago
His shirt doesn't have a collar...
Omniofaco 2 years ago 4
Not a big fan of wikipedia, but Wikia is awesome!
Justinfhtube 2 years ago
wikia! :D wikedpeedia :P
mattbiker419 2 years ago
"Wickeepeedeea"
Goldberg1337 2 years ago
i love the girls of this show they are real girls not CAmhores or emo bitches and they are smart
petar4onachev 2 years ago 4
And they also have just enough "real" to them to show they're really into this kind of thing, and not just there to attract male fans...
...although Ella is pretty damn adorable :P
ShingoEX 2 years ago
If WikiPedia wasn't edited by any old anonymous retard then perhaps it would deserve more praise. I've seen some amount of shit on Wiki'.
d2gizzo 2 years ago
Excellent content & such a talented interviewer as always...
Thank you, ROCKETBOOM!
n_n
ARhettE 2 years ago
Just hope wikipedia keeps up the good intentions. If it does grow big enough... Everybody has their price.
WERTY1112 2 years ago
**cough** youtube **cough**
damn ads..
MADE1NVIETNAM 2 years ago 2
I love Wikipedia and all wikis out there. Absolutly the best thing about the internet!
kevinh89 2 years ago 6
Fact: In the last ten years the population of the African Elephant has tripled.
CollateralSandwich 2 years ago 5
@CollateralSandwich HAHAHAHAHAHAHA son of a bitch you stole my line!!!!!
serpentisma 2 years ago
bit to much of but bla bla for me but that is because i dont like the subject :p
tdrone008 2 years ago
Then why'd you watch it?
TKGB2006 2 years ago
because im subscribed to rocketboom :p
tdrone008 2 years ago 2
Oh.
TKGB2006 2 years ago
I just re-subscribed Rocketboom to keep track of her interviews. She gives this shorts some kind of sweetness and freshness which makes one's day a lot better. Good work and thanks for interviewing Jimmy.
code933k 2 years ago 2
awesome
CIRCLEofLINKS 2 years ago 2
yea wikipedia
dmany13 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
GodLikeSkillz89 2 years ago
Congratulations!!!
ginomw 2 years ago 2