I like the liberties he took with the prelude, but personally I believe in sticking to the music, only because it's Bach. Maybe with Romantic you can get away with it, but not a purely straight, Baroque pieces like the WTC.
@aileneco12 Baroque music was much more concerned with freedom than Romantic. The prelude here was probably an improvisation that was written down. There is little music out there which is more profound and more passionate than the WTC.
@pianopower1 Afraid? I am playing this right now and I am ten. (It's actually fun and addicting.) Just to tell you, int the Fugue part the right hand playing both 1st and 2nd voice in measure 24 and 25 is ahrd because you have to use your 4th and fifth finger at the same time.
@SCArmCannon well, the listeners for one, and the composer's intention for another. If a piece loses its beauty or clarity because the performer is just showing off how fast they can play, or how good their finger-memory is, then it does the composer's music an injustice
@phryar How can you think this does the piece injustice? He's absolutely not just showing off speed here. Else why would he play the fugue part soo much slower than the prelude part? If he shows off speed, why is he playing many other pieces in a slower pace? Please don't tell me this isn't exceptionally beautifully played. And don't hate gould for this. Look up some others that has played this piece. Gould didn't start this trend. He's just good at it.
@phryar : : poliphony, man ! popolililililili, put your ears over the main roads and you'll find a new drag, and if you already walk on it you just don't like gould's playing, but nobody deeply cares here unless a part of their heart is devoted to gould, what you can understand as I do, I guess.
@hirgons Yes, I understand polyphony, as well as voicing, counterpoint and harmony. Try listening to some different performances by other artists, such as Angela Hewitt
@phryar The fact that you believe a composer's intentions and the audience's desires are in any way, shape, or form even remotely related to an artist is the greatest statement possible to the autruisitic brainwashing that has saturated our so-called democracy into a shade of its former, great self. We are nothing more but a bunch of tyrants that carry the banner of freedom while be secretly revel in the hammer and sickle. You disgust me.
@SCArmCannon So any opinion on an artistic performance that differs from yours is 'brainwashing' and disgusts you? What a very strange person you are. By the way, I think you mean 'altruistic'.
@SCArmCannon If you can't even spell (and it's a spelling error, not a typographical one) why should anyone pay any attention to your paranoid ranting?
Oh, I found another by the way - "while be secretly revel" doesn't even make sense. Crap spelling as well as grammar. You're not doing to well here.
@phryar You, sir or ma'am or whatever, have just proven my exact point in that you are merely a sore loser who resorts to low blows and irrelevent nit-pickiness...Just read the comments that others have for you and maybe you will finally see that this so-called audience that you aim to satisfy so much is, in reality, against you. If anyone is ranting here...it's you, because you're the one who talks more about my quantum typing mistakes than Gould and his interpretations...
@SCArmCannon and obviously, saying that I can't spell nor write with proper grammar because of a few obvious mechanical errors in typing, while avoiding the subject at hand, just makes you look, frankly, silly.
@SCArmCannon Just admit it, you're just jealous that Gould is original and successful....and that I'm right about his ingenuity and that you're wrong...it's also ironic since you persist in this that the statement in which you say I'm not doing too well, you make a mistake yourself, being that it's "too" and not "to".
@phryar Gould cared deeply about Bach's intentions. Occasionally he did exaggerate some aspects of the music but it was all to give a new revelation to the listeners. I don't think he was concerned with giving the "perfect" interpretation as giving an "educational" interpretation. But yes I do agree that the artist is of mere importance when compared to the composer and listener.
@Enix5548 There's a fascinating documentary about him showing that he was an early pioneer in recording techniques, and would micro-manage recordings for the sake of perfection - obsessively so in fact.
oh god i just finished learning the prelude, and i was expecting this recording to go fast, but when it started, i had a physical jolt away from my computer because of the tempo he was playing at.
What amazing FUN to sit here and just listen, especially to that fugue. Sometimes I wonder if a technician from the computer age did not take one of Gould's recordings and diker with it to make it so precise, but all I have to really do to check that idea out, is to listen to an old vinyl and confirm there was no need to. Gould was his own computer.
@KABRIS1 And you can know Gould's intentions, because he himself in due time explained them. The tempo is stretched to the limit: slow is extremely-slow and fast is extremely-fast. I prefer a bit more of moderation. Nevertheless, I've spent hours listening to Gould. I share the passion for Bach music. Bach, the super-genius.
I think rallentando aren't pointful for Bach thing! Prelude sounds like Chopin nocturne, only Chopin invent that musical mode, not I'm sorry - Bach. I hope you understand :)!
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi,i am looking for a fugue speciallist to tell me what is that chromatic fugue:
youtube.com/watch?v=yotypIIavlQ&list=HL1326399726&feature=mh_lolz
I found it as notes and then i made it with a music notation program
Enlightenment82 1 week ago
I like the liberties he took with the prelude, but personally I believe in sticking to the music, only because it's Bach. Maybe with Romantic you can get away with it, but not a purely straight, Baroque pieces like the WTC.
aileneco12 3 weeks ago
@aileneco12 Baroque music was much more concerned with freedom than Romantic. The prelude here was probably an improvisation that was written down. There is little music out there which is more profound and more passionate than the WTC.
Jolteon206 3 weeks ago
Love this fugue! i could dance to it XD
BassicStorm 1 month ago
wtf, i'm not even HALF his speed
boogeeboogie 2 months ago 6
I love that photo of the young Gould with a dog at the keyboard. He was so talented that he could probably teach a dog to play the piano.
MrTonykulas 2 months ago
うわあぁぁ こりゃ完璧だあ!
Wow ooo It's really perfect!
poti0909 3 months ago
Comment removed
poti0909 3 months ago
Comment removed
poti0909 3 months ago
aahhh, I feel like someone is massaging my brain when I listen to this, feels heavenly
junka22 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
MCHOI1108 3 months ago
Glenn is amazing. i like the way he plays the chords in the prelude. im rubbish compared to him
MCHOI1108 3 months ago
Comment removed
MCHOI1108 3 months ago
7 people are airheads.
music4me9613 3 months ago
wonderful !!!!!!
Maria18081977 3 months ago
The piano will never be played this well again.
111Blowfish 4 months ago 7
Bach was possessed by God.
Nomekiller 4 months ago
@tomclementss in canada with the royal conservatory of music there is grade ten and then ARCT or diploma
LiangVids 4 months ago
@spaceshouldbeallowed yea sorry, i meant Piece
LiangVids 4 months ago
that prelude is something else . . . oh Glenn.
BrantFortunate 4 months ago
So good.
ontupite 4 months ago
so good
lusiyuan1 4 months ago
awful
MrSalimMilas 4 months ago
@MrSalimMilas Dead.
FINKELANDPOLL 4 months ago
speechless
oh and btw, isn't this song a grade ten song?
LiangVids 6 months ago
@LiangVids It's not a song...
spaceshouldbeallowed 5 months ago 2
@LiangVids Well i'm doing it for my grade 8, there's no such thing as grade 10, after grade 8 it becomes diplomas.
tomclementss 5 months ago
@tomclementss There are ten grades in the RCM.
712Stephen 5 months ago
May all of you
go to my channel listening for the same song
and give me some comment ?
I ma having grade 8 exam with this song
conway200903 6 months ago
Give me some comment too.... go to my channel and listen to the same song please
I am having a grade 8 exam with this song
conway200903 6 months ago
grande interpretrazione =)
fiorearmwrestler 6 months ago
best
lusiyuan1 6 months ago
And i´m supposed to play this...
exia32 6 months ago 3
@exia32 good luck
misterj4mz 6 months ago
Such clarity. His playing is like crystal. To bad we can't see it though.
jaythoven67 7 months ago
amazing
iluvturkeyegg 7 months ago
Bravísimo!! Merci Beaucoup
marroyo666 7 months ago
but.. but.. I want to play like that as well :( So AMAZING !
nivtal20 8 months ago
Absolutely Inspirational!!! Makes me want to get to work.
Mr02213 8 months ago 13
how fast is this on a scale of one to ten?
Elsid1111 8 months ago
@Elsid1111 12
yumeybaconcutout 7 months ago
i'm afraid to play this
pianopower1 9 months ago 20
@pianopower1 tatallly agree!!!
eewawa2010 3 months ago
@pianopower1 Afraid? I am playing this right now and I am ten. (It's actually fun and addicting.) Just to tell you, int the Fugue part the right hand playing both 1st and 2nd voice in measure 24 and 25 is ahrd because you have to use your 4th and fifth finger at the same time.
connie3112 2 months ago
wonderful wonderful. A legendary pianist!
iguarni 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow he's amazing!
Alexberryscarylovee 9 months ago
How can anyone dislike this?
Arksband 10 months ago
I love the way gould does bach. Its weird, his style just makes my brain tingle more than is usual
SwampKing04 10 months ago
my god...
afffred 11 months ago
The problem with Gould was it was always more about him than Bach
phryar 11 months ago
@phryar Haha! So true!
Pianist46 11 months ago
@phryar If it's not about the artist who interprets the music, then who IS is about?
SCArmCannon 11 months ago
@SCArmCannon well, the listeners for one, and the composer's intention for another. If a piece loses its beauty or clarity because the performer is just showing off how fast they can play, or how good their finger-memory is, then it does the composer's music an injustice
phryar 11 months ago
@phryar How can you think this does the piece injustice? He's absolutely not just showing off speed here. Else why would he play the fugue part soo much slower than the prelude part? If he shows off speed, why is he playing many other pieces in a slower pace? Please don't tell me this isn't exceptionally beautifully played. And don't hate gould for this. Look up some others that has played this piece. Gould didn't start this trend. He's just good at it.
Ianthe22 11 months ago
@phryar You are speaking from the perspective of a business musician
SCArmCannon 11 months ago
@phryar : : poliphony, man ! popolililililili, put your ears over the main roads and you'll find a new drag, and if you already walk on it you just don't like gould's playing, but nobody deeply cares here unless a part of their heart is devoted to gould, what you can understand as I do, I guess.
hirgons 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hirgons Yes, I understand polyphony, as well as voicing, counterpoint and harmony. Try listening to some different performances by other artists, such as Angela Hewitt
phryar 1 week ago
Comment removed
SCArmCannon 1 month ago
@phryar The fact that you believe a composer's intentions and the audience's desires are in any way, shape, or form even remotely related to an artist is the greatest statement possible to the autruisitic brainwashing that has saturated our so-called democracy into a shade of its former, great self. We are nothing more but a bunch of tyrants that carry the banner of freedom while be secretly revel in the hammer and sickle. You disgust me.
SCArmCannon 1 month ago
@SCArmCannon So any opinion on an artistic performance that differs from yours is 'brainwashing' and disgusts you? What a very strange person you are. By the way, I think you mean 'altruistic'.
phryar 1 month ago
@phryar How typical of people like you to find irrelevent typos which you obviously can decipher in order to further your own faulty argument...
SCArmCannon 1 month ago
@SCArmCannon If you can't even spell (and it's a spelling error, not a typographical one) why should anyone pay any attention to your paranoid ranting?
Oh, I found another by the way - "while be secretly revel" doesn't even make sense. Crap spelling as well as grammar. You're not doing to well here.
phryar 1 month ago
@phryar You, sir or ma'am or whatever, have just proven my exact point in that you are merely a sore loser who resorts to low blows and irrelevent nit-pickiness...Just read the comments that others have for you and maybe you will finally see that this so-called audience that you aim to satisfy so much is, in reality, against you. If anyone is ranting here...it's you, because you're the one who talks more about my quantum typing mistakes than Gould and his interpretations...
SCArmCannon 2 weeks ago
@SCArmCannon and obviously, saying that I can't spell nor write with proper grammar because of a few obvious mechanical errors in typing, while avoiding the subject at hand, just makes you look, frankly, silly.
SCArmCannon 2 weeks ago
@SCArmCannon Just admit it, you're just jealous that Gould is original and successful....and that I'm right about his ingenuity and that you're wrong...it's also ironic since you persist in this that the statement in which you say I'm not doing too well, you make a mistake yourself, being that it's "too" and not "to".
SCArmCannon 2 weeks ago
@phryar I think you are wrong. It is always about the music for Gould. And why should it be about Bach? Gould is the one playing the instrument.
Ianthe22 11 months ago
@phryar Gould cared deeply about Bach's intentions. Occasionally he did exaggerate some aspects of the music but it was all to give a new revelation to the listeners. I don't think he was concerned with giving the "perfect" interpretation as giving an "educational" interpretation. But yes I do agree that the artist is of mere importance when compared to the composer and listener.
Enix5548 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Enix5548 There's a fascinating documentary about him showing that he was an early pioneer in recording techniques, and would micro-manage recordings for the sake of perfection - obsessively so in fact.
phryar 1 week ago
Comment removed
fbager 10 months ago
All that matters is whether you like the music.
fbager 10 months ago
I know, let´s play how fast can I play Bach. Ready, go!
wonderlasting 1 year ago
Very nice performance!
pianovirtuoso1000 1 year ago
Comment removed
ThePianistCat 1 year ago 2
precioso
ThePianistCat 1 year ago 2
The prelude was stupidly fast, seemed like he just wanted to get it over with. The fugue was great though
A7henderson 1 year ago
he plays it too fast to express the beauty of the prelude.
ladygaga1me 1 year ago
seriously guys he is not that good sometimes he plays very well but others not so good like this one he plays it to fast
lightmyfire90 1 year ago
I love the photo 00:47 !!!
The dog seems more focused on the score than Gould ! haha
SalHernor 1 year ago 4
oh god i just finished learning the prelude, and i was expecting this recording to go fast, but when it started, i had a physical jolt away from my computer because of the tempo he was playing at.
iansquared3 1 year ago 2
What amazing FUN to sit here and just listen, especially to that fugue. Sometimes I wonder if a technician from the computer age did not take one of Gould's recordings and diker with it to make it so precise, but all I have to really do to check that idea out, is to listen to an old vinyl and confirm there was no need to. Gould was his own computer.
TheOtherMusicMan 1 year ago
AND HE IS CANADIAN
raraandraja 1 year ago 4
lol this guy was really good at fingering :D:D
Pivotevil 1 year ago
This is insanely fast!! Fastest recording I've heard on YouTube thus far!
violinsrockdude 1 year ago
The prelude is supposed to be in improvisatory style, but he just....too much with section B....keep it light, is what I'm trying to say, I guess.
blooper631 1 year ago
Glenn's probably the only one who can play this piece in a matter of two and a half minutes. :O
RoyalDecapitation 1 year ago
@RoyalDecapitation richter plays it this fast
goldnuggetby 1 year ago
Glenn Gould is astonishing and amazing, no doubt. But the supersonic speed perhaps goes beyond Bach's intentions.
MusicVideoLooker 1 year ago
@MusicVideoLooker Only Bach would know his own intentions.
KABRIS1 1 year ago
@KABRIS1 And you can know Gould's intentions, because he himself in due time explained them. The tempo is stretched to the limit: slow is extremely-slow and fast is extremely-fast. I prefer a bit more of moderation. Nevertheless, I've spent hours listening to Gould. I share the passion for Bach music. Bach, the super-genius.
MusicVideoLooker 1 year ago
@MusicVideoLooker I hope you know what "supersonic" means... Plz don't tell me you seriously mean this is supersonic.
Ianthe22 1 year ago
1:09 - the fugue begins here
BrucknerMotet 1 year ago
Amazing speed in prelude, but all in tempo. Gj Glenn :D
Veldionar 1 year ago
Thank you Glenn Gould
bachkwt 1 year ago
perfection
anisometropie 1 year ago
I don't know why, but this version just doesn't work for me. No denying his technique is impeccable, but it just doesn't seem to feel right...
coujellis 1 year ago 2
suprisingly i hate this recording of prelude 21.... goulds the bach guy i understand, but way to kill the prelude.. idk it sucks, booooooo gould
oas1s2004 1 year ago
I think rallentando aren't pointful for Bach thing! Prelude sounds like Chopin nocturne, only Chopin invent that musical mode, not I'm sorry - Bach. I hope you understand :)!
In other way, this is 21 gs.
ChopperGAD 1 year ago
I thought it was Triple Pie And Mash Walk-in
wawawaanita 2 years ago 3
aye!
hatstalker 2 years ago
ahhh! i'm playing this for my jury tomorrow!!!!!! lol!
babygotbach22 2 years ago 2
good luck!
lkove 2 years ago 2
thanks! i got an A! :)
babygotbach22 2 years ago
un genio un genio un genioun genio un genio un genioun genio un genio un genioun genio un genio un genioun genio un genio un genio
iguarni 2 years ago
fantastic triple pie and mash walking there!
MrAde747 2 years ago
WOOW! awesome!
Kraviotho 2 years ago
er spielt das präludium voll anders als gewohnt ((=^_^=))
Franci110 2 years ago
0:47 funny dog ^^
ssXgeneral 2 years ago 3
Un genio... fortissimo a 0.47 !
Arithmos90 2 years ago
Absolutely amazing! I havn't got words!
etellerannet 2 years ago 28
Glenn is the best to play bach. Thank you.
chopin8585 2 years ago 24
@chopin8585 one of the best for sure (richter..!) but don't forget the harpichord players
hirgons 10 months ago