Why did he work to legalize child molestation and abortion, but not work to help homosexuals? I haven finished watching the vid yet, but thought it strange that if he was a gay child molester who was rewriting statistics to suit his desires, why wouldn't he push public acceptance for gays?
Oh, one more thing. He was a ZOOLOGIST!!!!!!!!! animals not people. WHY DID THE COURTS LISTEN TO HIM?????? if he wanted to study human nature, they should at least make sure he has the right degree!!!
Dr (of communications, not biology) Judith Reisman is a despicable homophobe with an ill-founed personal vendetta against Afred Kinsey. Her slurs on Kinsey are the same as her beliefs that the Nazi party was a homosexual movement - ludicrous and pernicious. Those who have been taken in by this bigotry and prurient wishful thinking should be ashamed.
He was a pedophile, and advocated for pro-pedophile laws, it does nothing to discount all of his great ideas about sexuality. I believe that on an individual level, sexuality is of paramount importance. His ideas were spot on in that respect. This whole bloating of the pedophilia issue is just a way for Right-wing Bible thumping imbeciles to say, "SEE, IT'S OKAY TO HATE FAGS, KINSEY WAS ALL WRONGG." Wrong. Ad Hominem, you stupid cunts. Look it the fuck up.
This is such a Christian propaganda film. These people are idiots. Every idea from the past must be evaluated with a respect for the present understandings, be it physics, astronomy, or biology. Until the 70's, the idea of ETHER pervaded in physics. It's an utter crockery. But it doesn't mean everything around ether was shit. We have learned so so much more about the universe since then, because of the wrongness of Ether. The same can be said for Kinsey. In my opinion, Kinsey was a hero. Even if
With kinsley Hippy movement died and gay movement was born. It was a Goverment manipulations to declare that homosexuality is an option but in fact all gays have been created, there´s no a gen to demostrate that homosexuality is normal. The nature is normal and if we have penis and woman have vagine it is to use together, oviusly. I´m not against homosexual people, the can do whatever they want, but they chosse an option depending of their lives,their love histories,their country,their city....
First things first: There is some truth to what is being told in this programme, and I do definatly not see Kinsley as some sort of lone hero for sexual liberty. But, having that said, for those of you not equipped with basic media-criticism here is a golden rule: Never take a programme seriously that only allows one side to have a say. My point: This programme just reaks of Fox Network to me.
@TheHmmhmm In a court of law (where it really counts, unless you don't believe we need laws to protect the innocent and punish the guilty), when a defendant's own witnesses provide evidence that tends to prove guilt, then it is more credible evidence (by LAW ) than prosecution witnesses evidence. This expose is rife with such evidence provided by defendant's witnesses and even Kinsey himself. End of story. Don't reply to me..you are an anarchist and you don't even realize it. You've been duped.
@finishstrongdoc I was not questioning any law or any court, although certain courts and certain laws could definatly be questioned still today. I was simply questioning the reliability, diversity and agenda of this documentary. In what way that would make me an anarchist I'm still none the wiser to, unless you're one of those who believe you can either be a "right-wing, fag hating conservative" or an "anarchist". You know, besides having a correct spelling, words also carry a meaning.
@TheHmmhmm ....oh, and by the way, the English language has correct and incorrect spellings of words. You even ignore spellcheck...so it's obvious that you are being given a very lenient interpretation of reality by your teachers. You should sue them.
This is very sickening to watch. This is the most backwoods conservative smear job I've ever heard. I love how it paints homosexuality in such a negative light... this is exactly the attitude kinsey was trying to put in the limelight.
This is very sickening to watch. This is the most backwoods conservative smear job I've ever heard. I love how paints homosexuality in such a negative light... this is exactly the attitude kinsey was trying to put in the limelight.
i can't believe how many dupes there are, how people are duped by hucksters like him and think they're "progressive." This has nothing to do with progress. Progress would be economic progress, but I don't think the Rockeffellers would want to sponsor that as they sponsored this clown.
over the course of my fifty years i have known many many homosexuals and nearly all have confided in me that they were abused as children , some of them do not see it as abuse , as they admit to having enjoyed it , but it is still abuse , i firmly believe that if they had not been exposed to this then they would not have turned out gay , i would also say that , not all victims of childhood abuse go on to be abusers , but nearly all abusers were abused themselves,
I mean I agree that anything involving kids should be totally illegal...in that regard Kinsey was wrong.,...but why these people attack homosexuals and pornography just doesnt make sense....those things are for consenting adults
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Poor Judith Reisman, she,s so frustrated because no one wants to fuck her ugly goddamn face. This documentary is disgusting and it wants to put us back a hundred years, NO PORNOGRAPHY, NO ABORTION, NO GAYS, I hope Reisman loves being a fucking bitch
I am a moderate who leans left. I am very accepting of homosexuals and lesbians. To me, where sexual orientation comes from shouldn't matter. It's a civil rights issue, and that's it, However, I have done enough research on Kinsey to know that the conservatives are 100% correct about him and non-bias when presenting all the facts. Gays and Lesbians need to find a new hero, because (tbc...)
using Kinsey's "research" as the foundation of human sexuality seems like a desperate reach for approval. It also makes the left, including gays and lesbians, look just as bad and guilty as the religious right when it comes to using false info, lies and sentiment as "fact" in order to manipulate while protesting for their rights.
Look, if you go back to the abbey of thelema, kenneth anger used his blacks magicks to put a spell on kinsey. then he wacked off on camera. and then they both sat around and looked creepy!
That fucking retard bitch Judith Reisman also says kinsey encouraged Fritz to kill and rape children!!!!!! She is so biased it makes no sense at all. she is an horrible woman
Oh my god they are saying that homosexuality acceptation and the legalization of abortion are bad things in this! Fucking church zombies what the hell is wrong with them????? They are assholes, they are disgusting
Well, i think abortion is bad and these people need to be steralized THEN let lose to FORNICATE. i myself am a huge queer and there are no bastards born of this unholy union of man on man lust.
Unless you believe michael aquino is a shit baby!
I think it is valid to question Kinsey's methods and political activism. What troubles me is when you over-simplify these problems and blame Kinsey for everything. This film is clearly pandering to a repressive, anti-gay, anti-sex political agenda.
Kinsey was wrong about many things -- that's typical of much science done in his time period -- but the answer is not to return to a society in which sex is a dirty, secretive thing that should only happen in the context of heterosexual marriage.
Finally, the spiritual consequences. Of course nobody believes that Hell exists, until they arrive there. This is just an additional example of the overall destruction taking place in our society. No one fears the eternal consequences of doing evil. And why should they? Even the Church has joined the "fun". Right now Kinsey would give anything to have just 1 hour alive again to repent. But it's too late, He faces the horrifying prospect of eternal death in unimaginable torment. I pity him.
Disease, broken homes & communities, the violence & crime that accompany "sexual freedom", the loss of innocence of children which in turn feeds the cycle of irresponsible behavior that often lands kids in prison, the untold emotional, psychic, physical & spiritual damage from the rape & molestation of children, which Kinsey helped to systematize, the prevalence of divorce & cohabitation which permanently damages kids & society at large, the death of commitment, all these MARVELOUS Kinsey gifts!
Another "benefit" of the sexual revolution - gangs. Fathers who have lost their authoritative role in the community & family. Teen boys turning to gangs to fill the void.Why take responsibility when there are condoms & abortion to take care of any unpleasant consequences of wetting your wick between the legs of a ho? If she has the kid, well, there's welfare!. Crowded prisons & plenty of welfare gals lugging those strollers onto the bus in the morning. Yeah! Just wanna feeeeeeel good bro!
Ha ha. The majority of pedophiles were mid-western bible thumping daddies. I take it yours got to you as well. Your father was not a product of a report on human sexuality, sorry. No scape-goat for you.
Kinsey was a monster, pure & simple. I wonder how many of those who defend him are themselves sexually attracted to children. He certainly made it a lot easier for you guys, didn't he? 1 out od 4 adults with herpes simplex, which never goes away. How do you like it when those sores appear? Makes it a bit painful for sex, doesn't it? The breakdown of families & the plague of unwed motherhood. Huzzah! What wonderful things "sexual liberation" brought us! Thank Kinsey the diddler for much of this.
Of course Playboy isn't considered porn today, given what else is out there. Those who don't consider Playboy as porn are themselves so brutalized that they don't realize it. 2 mongrel dogs screwing in an alley have more dignity than most humans engaged in sexual profligacy today. At least the dogs do it by instinct when necessary. What we have today is a generation of animals who can't keep their zippers closed or their legs together. Sluts, whores & pigs grunting away in swinish happiness.
They spend so much time portraying Kinsey as a monster, and then they inadvertently demolish their own argument. Kinsey was responsible for Roe v Wade? Oh no! Kinsey was responsible for legalized porn? Oh, Jesus, no!
So Kinsey was responsible for making America more sexually liberated and less of a repressed theocracy. Them's some heavy charges, boy howdy.
Look, this doc is produced by an agency that had it's own agenda. As far as Kinsey is concerned, right idea...wrong execution. They shouldn't be busting his chops on the fact he was doing sex research...just his methodologies.
Try as you might, you will never make Dr. Kinsey appear any less relevant. He was a pioneer. He did this research at a time when most people wouldn't dare talk about sex in polite conversation, much less record sexual histories.
His methods may have been flawed, but they opened the door to better studies of sexuality. Now people can get accurate information about sexuality; although this abstinence only crap makes it seem like people want to continue being ignorant.
Excuse me, sir. Being a "pioneer" is pointless. I could come up with thousands of perverted methods and become a "pioneer" as well. This does not mean anything but this: Kinsey dared to do something that NO ONE in his right state of mind would do. He was sick enough to molestate children "in the name of science." The ends justify the means, huh? And what are the ends? To prove that molestating children is acceptable. It is a vicious circle to support a perversion.
Perhaps you could be a pervert, but you wouldn't be a "pioneer." You profile says you're from Brazil. I'm sure you wouldn't say the ends didn't justify the means when Europeans usurped the land from the natives thus creating an industrialized country for you to live. BTW, Kinsey never molested children. Judith Reisman is a pseudo-scientist and a slanderer who is obsessed with discrediting Dr. Kinsey.
this doc. about kinsey is a crock... pure guesses, and speculation. unfounded accusations and NO proof what so ever aside from nothing more than testimony from obviousley biased right wingers.
Okay, wait a damn minute! Hugh Hefner? A PORN tycoon? I don't think so. Absolutely not. Do they even know what Playboy is? It's not considered porn at ALL. This piece of slanderous crap documentary just gets better and better. It's ridiculous. The amount of blatant bias in this program is truly shocking.
It is not your fault, because you have been brilliantly trained to be oblivious to it, but you are completely unaware of the political implications of the "sexual liberation" movement. You have no understanding of non-military subversion methods. Even in the 21st century, when the contrary should be obvious to all, you believe that nations and governments still matter. They don't. America was transformed to be properly merged into the international socialist system. It is upon us.
And what you're saying is not argument qualified? Calling people bigots and saying christifaggotry, No, you can say whatever you want, because it's obviously not an argument.
confidentiality is vital in the sciences! ALL SCIENCES! if he blew in his sources for the child molesters, not only this study but all Scientific studies would be discredited. DON"T BELIEVE THIS GOD FEARING BORDERLINE CULT CRAP. ..SCIENCE LIVES AND IS ALIVE AND WELL!!!!
Also even if adults consent anal sex we have to see the big problems of that.
1. Most homosexuals doesn't have a steady couple.
2. The rectum is a spongy part of the body and is dangerous to have sex in that part of the body because of aids and other diseases.
3. All gays should know something of psychology to know that homosexuality is something not good. Hellfireblogs if you don't believe me you should read "homosexuality: shadow in the land"
What you are saying is totally biased & wrong. Many straight people have anal sex. Anal sex has nothing to do with homosexuals having long or short relationships. Over 1/2 of heterosexual relationships end in divorce. Is this due to them having anal sex? NO! It's because relationships are tough for anybody. The hypocritical societal intolerance for gay people can be blamed for a lot of gay people's problems. Even animals display gay behavior. Do a search on gay animals if you don't believe it.
1. A steady couple is hard to do when your sexuality is condemned by bigots and people feel harassment is ok, even starting as children. Which is why you have so many "straight" men cheating on their wives with other men.
2. Oral sex is less risky for Aids than vaginal sex So you're saying people shouldn't have vaginal sex too? Doesn't make sense. Just wear a condom.
3. Hello. Gay isn't about psychology. It's the biology of the brain. Built in from birth. Either gay, bisexual, or straight.
1.There are not to MANY straight guys cheting on their wives. Even in communities in which homosexuality is ACEPTED,Homosexuals have not a steady couple.
2.if everyone in the world would have sex right now using a condom.
the entire population of peru would be infected by some kind of sexual disease .
Lmao, yes there are. The more famous ones end up on television. Every year there are public scandals of married men caught having or seeking sex with other men. This is thanks to the homophobic environment that they grew up in making them think they had to get married and have kids in order to "pray the gay away" or hide themselves. It's hilarious and sad.
And the world needs to stop populating, we are overcrowded. Use a condom.
I think that you are right about this (i'm not very sure).
I know that a group of gays was against NAMBLA.
But how does homosexuality is something normal if a group of gays caused problems to the American asociation of Psychiatry, instead of making a study to determine if homosexuality was a pathology.
You americans are so stupid that can't even watch a bussines that is trying to make americans think that homosexuality is a normal way of life.
Come on. A man who likes to have sex by introducing it's penis in the rectum of another man is something "normal"?¿?¿?
So you americans will be so stupid that in the next 50 years, havig sex with a 4 year's old child will be considered a way of life and the ones who see that as a perversion will be called pedophobics.
I think that you are right about this (i'm not very sure).
I know that a group of gays was against NAMBLA.
But how does homosexuality is something normal if a group of gays caused problems to the American asociation of Psychiatry, instead of making a study to determine if homosexuality was a pathology.
The difference btween gays and perverts is that gays seek relationships, sexual and otherwise, with the same sex while Pedos have fetishized children and are driven by the desire for sexual gratification which they receive through sadism. It is the unnaturalness of sex with children that turns pedophiles on while gays are adults minding their own business.
But how does homosexuality is something normal if many of them didn't recieve a "dad"'s love during childhood and they search this love in men during adulthood (this happens in most cases not all).
That shows me that Homosexuality is not a normal state of a person.
Well because that's simply not true. Fatherless homes are quite common in the inner cities among Black and Latino families but they produce less homosexuals than other groups.
Not having a father at home does not translate into liking a cock in the mouth if I may be so blunt.
There is nothing wrong with a man who happens to be born with attraction to another man. I think the problem is your perception of men and women. You probably believe that what gender a person happens to be born into determines their role in life.
I don't. I think the race, gender, social status or whatever your born with does not limit or determine who you have to be, what your job is, what your personality is, who you become attracted to, what education you achieve, etc.
An homosexual is a person who lacked of man love or a paternal figure during childhood. Homosexual are people that in many cases had suffered during childhood.
I understand homosexuals and we should help them to change. But something that is wrong is that we accept that being gay is something normal.
Most homosexual suffer from narcisim and doesn't have a stedy couple because they can't have a responsible relation with a girl because of it's psychological issues.
regemo if you are homosexual you should see a Psychologist and determine with your own eyes if your psychological state is normal.
That's not quite true. The problem is that your claiming sexual preferences are psychological conditions that can be treated. By that logic a shrink could stop me from preferring voluptuous women to skinny women or blonds to brunettes, or coffee to tea. A preference isn't a pathology and even if it was it simply doesn't effect anyone so it wouldn't matter. Pedophiles are sadists to enjoy the suffering their acts cause, gays are just dudes who like other dudes.
LOL. The APA does not consider homosexuality a pathology. It was forced into it's earlier view by politics. Science has made things clearer. But for some reason I don't think you are the science type.
Btw good luck in life thinking that 10% of the world population is pathologically ill. And that's not even including bisexuality.
Again, you ignore scientific study and only spout from opinion. Studies have shown that the non-straight population is around 10%. The APA wasn't forced by gay people. It was a discussion based on evidence and logic that reached the right conclusion.
Yes, the term gay is used more frequently. The same reason black people don't use the term negro to define themselves anymore. A population has the right to change the term being used for them.
One thing is your opinion and the other thing is your "studies".
Second...what is the difference between an homosexual and a pedophile?
If they have sex with people of the same sex (pedophiles also with "women"). So your society considers a pedophile a sexual deviant and a Homosexual a normal person because being homosexual is more accepted.
Third, the homosexuals forced with violent tactics the APA. PLEASE READ AND THEN TALK
If I am asian do I live an asian way of life because of my facial features? What defines me as asian? Am I asian because I look asian, is it because i am part of the culture, is it because my genes are asian?
The definition I use is that a person is gay or bisexual if they have ever had thoughts of arousal to a person of the same sex. We do live in an age where the brain can be scanned to see when and to what sexual arousal is happening. Brain scanning will become more frequent.
What defines you as Asian legally is the place you were born?
Second, the excuse you are using is that Homosexuality is a preference.
That is a non accurate excuse because a Pedophile would use the same excuse as you. Also a serial killer. So if HOMOSEXUALITY is a preference how can you born with a preference.
You do see a qualitavite difference though between consenting adults having sex and adults having sex with children though, no?
Look, if two gals who are both adults decide to have sex it simply doesn't effect anyone else. When an adult violates a child it does, as does murder. Surely you can't relate raping children and murder people to gay or lesbian sex?
Why a great part of homosexuals lacked of a father's (Dad if is not understandable) love and they search for a man's love in adulthood by having this type of relationships with other men.
You should read something of Psychology to realize that Homosexuality is not a preference is a pathology.
To put pedophilia in the same sentence as homosexuality is wrong to both gay people and children. Child abuse has nothing to do with two adults consenting to an action. You are exploiting abused children and insulting gay people.
Second, IMO if you have sexual thoughts about children (even for a min) but never act on them you are still a pedophile. If you have sexual thoughts about the opposite sex, u are either straight or bisexual. It's not preference, it's the way your brain works.
Two people in my family are psychologists. Most people growing up today lack a stable father in their life growing up. They still turn out to the same percentages of straight, bisexual, and gay as people who have a stable father.
It's a myth that if a father is too weak, or too violent, or not around enough that the child will be gay. All you need to do is look at gay people who had great fathers, and straight people who never had a father figure at all growing up.
Did you know the profit of sex bussines and why is a coincidence that Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and the Rockefeller family are investing in this type of bussiness?
No, you didn't because you were watching the superbowl while you were eating a Big Mac.
You know about the profit of selling fetus for the production of vaccines and other products?
no, you don't know because Mtv doesn't say anything about this bussiness.
Did you know about Margaret Sanger(planned parenthood founder) was a racist and promiscuous women who talked about black people as: Stupid race or even a##holes?
NO, you americans didn' know because New york times didn't even mention the subject.
Part of the reason kids get molested is because no one understands why it happens. Kinsey should be thanked for doing what he did, and not be morally flagellated over it.
I'm pretty sure Kinsey only did what was legal. If someone was stupid enough to allow themselves to be molested (and not even know about it, for God's sake?), it's their own damn fault. Child molestation is a preventable problem thanks to the psychological research that has gone into the topic. Kinsey learned about this stuff in order to educate close-minded morons like you.
If I got raped, I would blame myself or the jackass responsible for it. Not an entomologist who died fifty years ago.
how can a child be to blame when they are molested? It is the adult family members duty to protect the children in the family. Not take advantage of them. A child is powerless & is often terrified from the threats that the molestor tells them. Blaming the child is just WRONG!
Vatoxido was speaking as though s/he was referring to an adult getting molested. What I don't understand is why people think Kinsey is responsible for child molestation. That was my point. Please read the bottom-line before you go making assumptions.
So in your country even if the parents of the molested child gives permission to other person to have intercourse with their son, still is legal????
So, legaly an eight year's old boy is considered an adult to take this kind of decissions?? What a moron you are even if it was with the approval of the kid it's decission doesn't count because in this kind of experiments is needed a document in which the test subject (an adult) signs that he approves the experiment.
I'm sorry - at what point did I say anything along that line? There is no proof anywhere that says Kinsey ever had sex with children. Is it so wrong for someone to wonder why it happens? All you conservative pissants sit around whining about child molestation without providing a solution. A guy tries to educate people about their basest of instincts and he might as well be given the death penalty. What the fuck is wrong with you idiots?
man kinsey should have been executed for this, early 19th century to its middle years america the superpower was being played from the inside, the very thing, their ancestors fought is the very thing they are becoming right now... pitiful, soon that country will go down to the pit for their mistakes if the people continue to blind themselves, just like any empire it will decline
Kinsey is evil. What he did was unconscionable, and his victims of his "revolution", are still paying for his crimes. Any support for him is wrong. Period.
Stop celebrating perversion. Stop worshiping science. Find God, and realize that you are a sinner.
Realize that Playboy, which is evil, would not have been, without this so-called "research".
Kinsey was not the first to research sexuality. German psychologists were writing about it in the days before Hitler. The Germans were not prudish about sex, and they saw Kinsey's research as silly and wastefull. Kinsey didn't visit Germany, and I doubt he liked dealing with foreign academics.
sooo. who is doing this cover up 4 kinsey. It just doesnt make sense that all of this has happened and other pedophile scientists hid it 4 him and no1 blew the whistle? and now porn is bad 4 the american public bcuz kinsey supported it? this sounds like these ppl are against porn homosexuals and abortiona laws and by dicrediting kinseythey can say that all of these things r bad 4 the american society. shame on these documentarians 4 their irresponisble research
This is total BS.Kinsey and company only reported what was already happening in the sexual lives of those who consented to give their sexual histories.Of course they also engaged in sexual activity with each other, but to insist that Kinsey and the others condoned and participated in pedophilia is complete BS.People are such hypocritical scaredy cats - afraid of themselves more than anything else. I may not be able to articulate it fully - but self imposed ignorance is essential for acceptance.
So basically your whole point is this: Kinsey is responsible for acceptance of sexual diversity, the freedom to make pornography, and better abortion laws. And somehow, in your messed up world all of this is supposed to be a bad thing? Oh, and also that he was a pedophile because he said their was nothing wrong with children getting sexual urges. Yeah, you're not a bunch of old paranoid squares.
We have school shootings, child sex offenders (children who molest other children), and inner city children growing up with no fathers but plenty of "uncles" (who sometimes abuse the children). Even 30 years ago, movies (Pretty Baby and Taxi Driver) cast pre-teen girls as prostitutes. 1 in 4 girls is raped or sexually abused by adulthood. Abortion is accepted, but executing child rapists is considered cruel punishment. Something has gone seriously wrong in the past 50 years.
Um, actually, statistically speaking, children are much safer than they were fifty years ago from sexual predators. The difference is that nowadays we more freely talk about these things. I'm not against this, but it does seem to have the side effect of making people paranoid. It probably has to do the way the information is sensationalized by the media. As for your last comment, what has gone wrong in the last fifty years exactly? (cont'd on next post)
Statistically, 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys is sexually assaulted by their 18th birthday. That is just what is reported.
The sad thing is that those statistics are reflected in the % of people I know personally who were sexually abused as children. So it's not paranoia or propaganda. Children are no safer these days, with the advent of the internet and the ability to gather information, than they were 50 years ago. I'd say it's gotten worse.
Was it giving black people equal rights? Or perhaps it was decriminalizing homosexuality? Or not forcing all women to be stay at home moms? We've made some amazing strides in the last fifty years, but you think things have gotten worse because a criminal has more rights than a pile of cells? Get real.
What went wrong in part was the sexual revolution's attack on black fatherhood. I've worked for years in inner city Miami's black community and I have heard their sentiments. Young men will use their agression to be either protectors (faithful husbands and fathers) or predators (thugs and baby daddies). Easy sex inspires the latter; chastity and fidelity inspires the former.
Th film adresses his interviews with pedophiles. Maybe you could watch past the first five minutes. And working with pedophiles to gather information about the way their mind works doesn't mean that he's a child molester. Police do it all the time to track child molesters.
WHAT?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Do you not see the irony in insisting that Kinsey was linked to a child rapist based on the child rapist's own testimony? My god. You guys are really getting desperate.
Kinsey's data was skewed.... correct. But understand this: Sexual depravity is the natural state of the male animal and has been at the core of the downfall of most prior civilizations. Given absolute sexual freedom without any social or moral restraints, most men will screw anything and EVERYTHING! will Judaism placed sexuality into the context of marriage between a man and a woman in order to preserve a civil and prosperous society. This is not a religious statement, just a fact.
Are you kidding me?!? Some people are turing this into a racist/politcal/religous issue?! Really?!?! This pervert participated in crimes against children!!! And then called it scientific and it was ok. I don't care what race, religion, politcal party, sexual orientation you are. As human beings we should be outraged at this! And that this man's "research" is now the basis for laws and sex ed quidelines. Please! Can't we just stop and use our brains for once?!
what is up with the anti-semitism expressed in many of these comments? dr. reisman has done a wonderful service to the entire world - only a demon possessed pedophile or pedophile lover would discount her objective observations. keep up the good work judith and may God bless the children.
This movie that will be out or is out will increase the sexually insanity & perhaps all the religous insanity as I can see. religion is created & controlled by man/government, therefore it's rediculous to critize one group or another. They all work together for the World Bank in oder to tear apart any normality the "slaves" (income tax payers) may have. I hope this bring this evil to the light so it can be healed.
Remember that Dr Green and Dr Greenberg is the Nazi, Josef Mengele who has bought over to the U.S by Operation Paper via the Roman Catholic Priest, Krusoslav Dragonovic and his ratlines. All protected by the Vatican and their British Intelligence. British Intelligence then created the CIA by merging most of the O.S.S with the Gestapo. All funded behind the scenes using stolen Judiac money from the Holocaust.
I think Judith Levine (not Reisman) is a better figure than Reisman or Kinsey. She is the one who wrote, Harmful to Minors which has a theme of decently speculating on both extreme sides of sex-issues in society and politics.
I was always skeptical about Kinsey's claims. It's good that sex isn't the tabu anymore that it once was, but the pendulum has swung too far to the other extreme. The ubiquituousness of porn has turned society into a bunch of perverts. JMO.
Right on. But. Sex is supposed to be taboo. Why? It's a matter between husband and wife, not an exhibition for the masses. We shouldn't talk so much sex, just have it, and within marriage I might add. Above all it's a procreation act, isn't it?
No, sex should no be a taboo subject. It's a good thing that we can now discuss sexual problems, etc. but it's gone too far; it's turned into an obsession. I do not agree that sex needs to be restricted to marriage only, and it's not just for procreation, either.
Burn his fucking perverted institute down !
pcpaulius 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from jareisman
Why did he work to legalize child molestation and abortion, but not work to help homosexuals? I haven finished watching the vid yet, but thought it strange that if he was a gay child molester who was rewriting statistics to suit his desires, why wouldn't he push public acceptance for gays?
Oh, one more thing. He was a ZOOLOGIST!!!!!!!!! animals not people. WHY DID THE COURTS LISTEN TO HIM?????? if he wanted to study human nature, they should at least make sure he has the right degree!!!
There
me39274 2 months ago
@me39274 because they were so desperate to unleash their pedophilistic desires, sick fucking scums
pcpaulius 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from jareisman
When a priest holds serial killer's confession to himself, no one says a god damn thing.
machket 4 months ago
Dr (of communications, not biology) Judith Reisman is a despicable homophobe with an ill-founed personal vendetta against Afred Kinsey. Her slurs on Kinsey are the same as her beliefs that the Nazi party was a homosexual movement - ludicrous and pernicious. Those who have been taken in by this bigotry and prurient wishful thinking should be ashamed.
GeorgesBarras 6 months ago
He was a pedophile, and advocated for pro-pedophile laws, it does nothing to discount all of his great ideas about sexuality. I believe that on an individual level, sexuality is of paramount importance. His ideas were spot on in that respect. This whole bloating of the pedophilia issue is just a way for Right-wing Bible thumping imbeciles to say, "SEE, IT'S OKAY TO HATE FAGS, KINSEY WAS ALL WRONGG." Wrong. Ad Hominem, you stupid cunts. Look it the fuck up.
darrbare 10 months ago
This is such a Christian propaganda film. These people are idiots. Every idea from the past must be evaluated with a respect for the present understandings, be it physics, astronomy, or biology. Until the 70's, the idea of ETHER pervaded in physics. It's an utter crockery. But it doesn't mean everything around ether was shit. We have learned so so much more about the universe since then, because of the wrongness of Ether. The same can be said for Kinsey. In my opinion, Kinsey was a hero. Even if
darrbare 10 months ago
With kinsley Hippy movement died and gay movement was born. It was a Goverment manipulations to declare that homosexuality is an option but in fact all gays have been created, there´s no a gen to demostrate that homosexuality is normal. The nature is normal and if we have penis and woman have vagine it is to use together, oviusly. I´m not against homosexual people, the can do whatever they want, but they chosse an option depending of their lives,their love histories,their country,their city....
franj27 1 year ago
First things first: There is some truth to what is being told in this programme, and I do definatly not see Kinsley as some sort of lone hero for sexual liberty. But, having that said, for those of you not equipped with basic media-criticism here is a golden rule: Never take a programme seriously that only allows one side to have a say. My point: This programme just reaks of Fox Network to me.
TheHmmhmm 1 year ago
@TheHmmhmm In a court of law (where it really counts, unless you don't believe we need laws to protect the innocent and punish the guilty), when a defendant's own witnesses provide evidence that tends to prove guilt, then it is more credible evidence (by LAW ) than prosecution witnesses evidence. This expose is rife with such evidence provided by defendant's witnesses and even Kinsey himself. End of story. Don't reply to me..you are an anarchist and you don't even realize it. You've been duped.
finishstrongdoc 11 months ago
@finishstrongdoc I was not questioning any law or any court, although certain courts and certain laws could definatly be questioned still today. I was simply questioning the reliability, diversity and agenda of this documentary. In what way that would make me an anarchist I'm still none the wiser to, unless you're one of those who believe you can either be a "right-wing, fag hating conservative" or an "anarchist". You know, besides having a correct spelling, words also carry a meaning.
TheHmmhmm 11 months ago
@TheHmmhmm ....oh, and by the way, the English language has correct and incorrect spellings of words. You even ignore spellcheck...so it's obvious that you are being given a very lenient interpretation of reality by your teachers. You should sue them.
finishstrongdoc 11 months ago
@finishstrongdoc You should look up the word "anarchist" in a dictionary.
TheHmmhmm 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is very sickening to watch. This is the most backwoods conservative smear job I've ever heard. I love how it paints homosexuality in such a negative light... this is exactly the attitude kinsey was trying to put in the limelight.
mcsibs 1 year ago
This is very sickening to watch. This is the most backwoods conservative smear job I've ever heard. I love how paints homosexuality in such a negative light... this is exactly the attitude kinsey was trying to put in the limelight.
mcsibs 1 year ago
i can't believe how many dupes there are, how people are duped by hucksters like him and think they're "progressive." This has nothing to do with progress. Progress would be economic progress, but I don't think the Rockeffellers would want to sponsor that as they sponsored this clown.
gosciu555 1 year ago
over the course of my fifty years i have known many many homosexuals and nearly all have confided in me that they were abused as children , some of them do not see it as abuse , as they admit to having enjoyed it , but it is still abuse , i firmly believe that if they had not been exposed to this then they would not have turned out gay , i would also say that , not all victims of childhood abuse go on to be abusers , but nearly all abusers were abused themselves,
knucklebutty 1 year ago
I mean I agree that anything involving kids should be totally illegal...in that regard Kinsey was wrong.,...but why these people attack homosexuals and pornography just doesnt make sense....those things are for consenting adults
ninetiesbaby10 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Poor Judith Reisman, she,s so frustrated because no one wants to fuck her ugly goddamn face. This documentary is disgusting and it wants to put us back a hundred years, NO PORNOGRAPHY, NO ABORTION, NO GAYS, I hope Reisman loves being a fucking bitch
TheAmazingstarman 1 year ago
@TheAmazingstarman Do you honestly think the world is a better place today???
maitreyaisthebeast 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheAmazingstarman He molested children you fucking moron.
astrolifter 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am a moderate who leans left. I am very accepting of homosexuals and lesbians. To me, where sexual orientation comes from shouldn't matter. It's a civil rights issue, and that's it, However, I have done enough research on Kinsey to know that the conservatives are 100% correct about him and non-bias when presenting all the facts. Gays and Lesbians need to find a new hero, because (tbc...)
funk7000 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
using Kinsey's "research" as the foundation of human sexuality seems like a desperate reach for approval. It also makes the left, including gays and lesbians, look just as bad and guilty as the religious right when it comes to using false info, lies and sentiment as "fact" in order to manipulate while protesting for their rights.
funk7000 2 years ago
Comment removed
jorg1111 2 years ago
look shes a homophobe and a retard, she shouldnt be able to fucking be interviewed, crazy cunt
TheAmazingstarman 2 years ago
Look, if you go back to the abbey of thelema, kenneth anger used his blacks magicks to put a spell on kinsey. then he wacked off on camera. and then they both sat around and looked creepy!
1stTimothy6KJV 2 years ago
I think these people need to get laid and chill out.
purgal20 2 years ago
i never had a child and could raise children better than anyone you ever met, go figure
1stTimothy6KJV 2 years ago
That fucking retard bitch Judith Reisman also says kinsey encouraged Fritz to kill and rape children!!!!!! She is so biased it makes no sense at all. she is an horrible woman
TheAmazingstarman 2 years ago
Oh my god they are saying that homosexuality acceptation and the legalization of abortion are bad things in this! Fucking church zombies what the hell is wrong with them????? They are assholes, they are disgusting
TheAmazingstarman 2 years ago
Well, i think abortion is bad and these people need to be steralized THEN let lose to FORNICATE. i myself am a huge queer and there are no bastards born of this unholy union of man on man lust.
Unless you believe michael aquino is a shit baby!
1stTimothy6KJV 2 years ago
I think it is valid to question Kinsey's methods and political activism. What troubles me is when you over-simplify these problems and blame Kinsey for everything. This film is clearly pandering to a repressive, anti-gay, anti-sex political agenda.
Kinsey was wrong about many things -- that's typical of much science done in his time period -- but the answer is not to return to a society in which sex is a dirty, secretive thing that should only happen in the context of heterosexual marriage.
jontv 2 years ago 3
Thanks Jews!
SunnyIllusion 2 years ago
Child sexual abuse exist before Kinsey, but now most of countries around the world put in jails pedophiles.
WALTKRIEG 2 years ago 2
Finally, the spiritual consequences. Of course nobody believes that Hell exists, until they arrive there. This is just an additional example of the overall destruction taking place in our society. No one fears the eternal consequences of doing evil. And why should they? Even the Church has joined the "fun". Right now Kinsey would give anything to have just 1 hour alive again to repent. But it's too late, He faces the horrifying prospect of eternal death in unimaginable torment. I pity him.
aerodc8 2 years ago
Hell is built and maintained by Christians.
TODDJihadAFR 2 years ago
Disease, broken homes & communities, the violence & crime that accompany "sexual freedom", the loss of innocence of children which in turn feeds the cycle of irresponsible behavior that often lands kids in prison, the untold emotional, psychic, physical & spiritual damage from the rape & molestation of children, which Kinsey helped to systematize, the prevalence of divorce & cohabitation which permanently damages kids & society at large, the death of commitment, all these MARVELOUS Kinsey gifts!
aerodc8 2 years ago
All of what you list didn't exist before a scientist generated a report? You were home-schooled, weren't you?
TODDJihadAFR 2 years ago
Another "benefit" of the sexual revolution - gangs. Fathers who have lost their authoritative role in the community & family. Teen boys turning to gangs to fill the void.Why take responsibility when there are condoms & abortion to take care of any unpleasant consequences of wetting your wick between the legs of a ho? If she has the kid, well, there's welfare!. Crowded prisons & plenty of welfare gals lugging those strollers onto the bus in the morning. Yeah! Just wanna feeeeeeel good bro!
aerodc8 2 years ago
Ha ha. The majority of pedophiles were mid-western bible thumping daddies. I take it yours got to you as well. Your father was not a product of a report on human sexuality, sorry. No scape-goat for you.
TODDJihadAFR 2 years ago
Kinsey was a monster, pure & simple. I wonder how many of those who defend him are themselves sexually attracted to children. He certainly made it a lot easier for you guys, didn't he? 1 out od 4 adults with herpes simplex, which never goes away. How do you like it when those sores appear? Makes it a bit painful for sex, doesn't it? The breakdown of families & the plague of unwed motherhood. Huzzah! What wonderful things "sexual liberation" brought us! Thank Kinsey the diddler for much of this.
aerodc8 2 years ago
Of course Playboy isn't considered porn today, given what else is out there. Those who don't consider Playboy as porn are themselves so brutalized that they don't realize it. 2 mongrel dogs screwing in an alley have more dignity than most humans engaged in sexual profligacy today. At least the dogs do it by instinct when necessary. What we have today is a generation of animals who can't keep their zippers closed or their legs together. Sluts, whores & pigs grunting away in swinish happiness.
aerodc8 2 years ago
This is hilarious.
They spend so much time portraying Kinsey as a monster, and then they inadvertently demolish their own argument. Kinsey was responsible for Roe v Wade? Oh no! Kinsey was responsible for legalized porn? Oh, Jesus, no!
So Kinsey was responsible for making America more sexually liberated and less of a repressed theocracy. Them's some heavy charges, boy howdy.
Stupid conservatives.
orlandobloomsucks 2 years ago
Look, this doc is produced by an agency that had it's own agenda. As far as Kinsey is concerned, right idea...wrong execution. They shouldn't be busting his chops on the fact he was doing sex research...just his methodologies.
spectman1 2 years ago
Try as you might, you will never make Dr. Kinsey appear any less relevant. He was a pioneer. He did this research at a time when most people wouldn't dare talk about sex in polite conversation, much less record sexual histories.
His methods may have been flawed, but they opened the door to better studies of sexuality. Now people can get accurate information about sexuality; although this abstinence only crap makes it seem like people want to continue being ignorant.
AlcolmEx 2 years ago
Excuse me, sir. Being a "pioneer" is pointless. I could come up with thousands of perverted methods and become a "pioneer" as well. This does not mean anything but this: Kinsey dared to do something that NO ONE in his right state of mind would do. He was sick enough to molestate children "in the name of science." The ends justify the means, huh? And what are the ends? To prove that molestating children is acceptable. It is a vicious circle to support a perversion.
milunhasartisticas 2 years ago 16
Perhaps you could be a pervert, but you wouldn't be a "pioneer." You profile says you're from Brazil. I'm sure you wouldn't say the ends didn't justify the means when Europeans usurped the land from the natives thus creating an industrialized country for you to live. BTW, Kinsey never molested children. Judith Reisman is a pseudo-scientist and a slanderer who is obsessed with discrediting Dr. Kinsey.
AlcolmEx 2 years ago
Kinsey was such sick bastard!
Absynthe12 2 years ago 8
this doc. about kinsey is a crock... pure guesses, and speculation. unfounded accusations and NO proof what so ever aside from nothing more than testimony from obviousley biased right wingers.
Diannakw 2 years ago
Okay, wait a damn minute! Hugh Hefner? A PORN tycoon? I don't think so. Absolutely not. Do they even know what Playboy is? It's not considered porn at ALL. This piece of slanderous crap documentary just gets better and better. It's ridiculous. The amount of blatant bias in this program is truly shocking.
Orchadorkcello 2 years ago
It is not your fault, because you have been brilliantly trained to be oblivious to it, but you are completely unaware of the political implications of the "sexual liberation" movement. You have no understanding of non-military subversion methods. Even in the 21st century, when the contrary should be obvious to all, you believe that nations and governments still matter. They don't. America was transformed to be properly merged into the international socialist system. It is upon us.
jackiedowsett 2 years ago 2
The Christfaggotry is strong in these ones. They attack abortion, homosexuality, , oh god what else...pornography. What a bunch of bigots.
DestroyGender 2 years ago 2
Way to not address the points made in this film. Argument from outrage is not an argument at all.
schticky547 2 years ago
You sound like a beacon of logical thinking and understanding.
usmm05 2 years ago
Hey guys, I believe you're supposed to point out logical fallacies when someone actually TRIES to make an argument.
Maybe you should leave an outrage as an outrage and not try to pretend it's an argument. You know not EVERYTHING constitutes an argument.
DestroyGender 2 years ago
And what you're saying is not argument qualified? Calling people bigots and saying christifaggotry, No, you can say whatever you want, because it's obviously not an argument.
usmm05 2 years ago
confidentiality is vital in the sciences! ALL SCIENCES! if he blew in his sources for the child molesters, not only this study but all Scientific studies would be discredited. DON"T BELIEVE THIS GOD FEARING BORDERLINE CULT CRAP. ..SCIENCE LIVES AND IS ALIVE AND WELL!!!!
philgigs 3 years ago
The reason because everyone talks about sex now, is because a group of bussiness man discovered that sex was a great bussiness.
Fast profit after a small investment.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Also even if adults consent anal sex we have to see the big problems of that.
1. Most homosexuals doesn't have a steady couple.
2. The rectum is a spongy part of the body and is dangerous to have sex in that part of the body because of aids and other diseases.
3. All gays should know something of psychology to know that homosexuality is something not good. Hellfireblogs if you don't believe me you should read "homosexuality: shadow in the land"
Vatoxido 3 years ago
What you are saying is totally biased & wrong. Many straight people have anal sex. Anal sex has nothing to do with homosexuals having long or short relationships. Over 1/2 of heterosexual relationships end in divorce. Is this due to them having anal sex? NO! It's because relationships are tough for anybody. The hypocritical societal intolerance for gay people can be blamed for a lot of gay people's problems. Even animals display gay behavior. Do a search on gay animals if you don't believe it.
urbaandiultra 3 years ago 2
Consult a good psychologist and then we talk about it.
"...hypocritical societal intolerance for gay people..."ha,ha,ha
So you mean that everybody is homosexual but nobody admits it because the society is hypocritical¿?¿?¿?
So you are saying that i am gay and i don't admit it because i am an intolerant.
Animals display this behavior because they use this behavior to show their mates that they are redy for sex not because they are homosexuals.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Okeeeeeeyyyyyyyy!!!!!!
Anal sex isn't only for gays but that doesn't mean that is a healthy way of sex...RIGHT???????????
Vatoxido 2 years ago
1. A steady couple is hard to do when your sexuality is condemned by bigots and people feel harassment is ok, even starting as children. Which is why you have so many "straight" men cheating on their wives with other men.
2. Oral sex is less risky for Aids than vaginal sex So you're saying people shouldn't have vaginal sex too? Doesn't make sense. Just wear a condom.
3. Hello. Gay isn't about psychology. It's the biology of the brain. Built in from birth. Either gay, bisexual, or straight.
regemo 3 years ago
regemo
1.There are not to MANY straight guys cheting on their wives. Even in communities in which homosexuality is ACEPTED,Homosexuals have not a steady couple.
2.if everyone in the world would have sex right now using a condom.
the entire population of peru would be infected by some kind of sexual disease .
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Lmao, yes there are. The more famous ones end up on television. Every year there are public scandals of married men caught having or seeking sex with other men. This is thanks to the homophobic environment that they grew up in making them think they had to get married and have kids in order to "pray the gay away" or hide themselves. It's hilarious and sad.
And the world needs to stop populating, we are overcrowded. Use a condom.
regemo 3 years ago 3
Of course the famous ones not the common population.
You should take a look to the enviroment in which they live.
2nd. If condom is so effective why there is aids in Africa if condoms were created before the 14th century
Vatoxido 2 years ago
Hellfireblogs thanks for your comment.
I think that you are right about this (i'm not very sure).
I know that a group of gays was against NAMBLA.
But how does homosexuality is something normal if a group of gays caused problems to the American asociation of Psychiatry, instead of making a study to determine if homosexuality was a pathology.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
You americans are so stupid that can't even watch a bussines that is trying to make americans think that homosexuality is a normal way of life.
Come on. A man who likes to have sex by introducing it's penis in the rectum of another man is something "normal"?¿?¿?
So you americans will be so stupid that in the next 50 years, havig sex with a 4 year's old child will be considered a way of life and the ones who see that as a perversion will be called pedophobics.
PLEASE HAVE COMMON SENSE
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Most Gays actually don't participate in anal sex but regardless no one has a problem with consenting adults, it's pedophilia that we're against
Hellfireblogs 3 years ago 3
Hellfireblogs thanks for your comment.
I think that you are right about this (i'm not very sure).
I know that a group of gays was against NAMBLA.
But how does homosexuality is something normal if a group of gays caused problems to the American asociation of Psychiatry, instead of making a study to determine if homosexuality was a pathology.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
The difference btween gays and perverts is that gays seek relationships, sexual and otherwise, with the same sex while Pedos have fetishized children and are driven by the desire for sexual gratification which they receive through sadism. It is the unnaturalness of sex with children that turns pedophiles on while gays are adults minding their own business.
Hellfireblogs 3 years ago
Again thanks for your comment.
I really enjoy talking with you.
But how does homosexuality is something normal if many of them didn't recieve a "dad"'s love during childhood and they search this love in men during adulthood (this happens in most cases not all).
That shows me that Homosexuality is not a normal state of a person.
Homosexuality is a subject of human nature.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Well because that's simply not true. Fatherless homes are quite common in the inner cities among Black and Latino families but they produce less homosexuals than other groups.
Not having a father at home does not translate into liking a cock in the mouth if I may be so blunt.
Hellfireblogs 3 years ago
There is nothing wrong with a man who happens to be born with attraction to another man. I think the problem is your perception of men and women. You probably believe that what gender a person happens to be born into determines their role in life.
I don't. I think the race, gender, social status or whatever your born with does not limit or determine who you have to be, what your job is, what your personality is, who you become attracted to, what education you achieve, etc.
regemo 3 years ago
People doesn't born homosexual.
An homosexual is a person who lacked of man love or a paternal figure during childhood. Homosexual are people that in many cases had suffered during childhood.
I understand homosexuals and we should help them to change. But something that is wrong is that we accept that being gay is something normal.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Most homosexual suffer from narcisim and doesn't have a stedy couple because they can't have a responsible relation with a girl because of it's psychological issues.
regemo if you are homosexual you should see a Psychologist and determine with your own eyes if your psychological state is normal.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
That's not quite true. The problem is that your claiming sexual preferences are psychological conditions that can be treated. By that logic a shrink could stop me from preferring voluptuous women to skinny women or blonds to brunettes, or coffee to tea. A preference isn't a pathology and even if it was it simply doesn't effect anyone so it wouldn't matter. Pedophiles are sadists to enjoy the suffering their acts cause, gays are just dudes who like other dudes.
Hellfireblogs 3 years ago
The american Psychiatry asociation was considering homosexuality a pathology.
Please regemo of you don't believe me and you are angry because of what i have just said talk to a professional for help and open your eyes.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
LOL. The APA does not consider homosexuality a pathology. It was forced into it's earlier view by politics. Science has made things clearer. But for some reason I don't think you are the science type.
Btw good luck in life thinking that 10% of the world population is pathologically ill. And that's not even including bisexuality.
regemo 3 years ago 2
Sorry but this is not true.
Homosexuals say that 10% of the population is gay which is completely wrong.
Gays are not even 2% of world population.
The APA was forced by gay people instead of making a research to determine if homosexuality was something wrong.
For example the slang.
Gay means happy and the homosexuals called themselves gays instead of homosexuals to change people minds.
If homosexuality is a way of life. How can you born with a way of life if homsxlty i genetical?
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Again, you ignore scientific study and only spout from opinion. Studies have shown that the non-straight population is around 10%. The APA wasn't forced by gay people. It was a discussion based on evidence and logic that reached the right conclusion.
Yes, the term gay is used more frequently. The same reason black people don't use the term negro to define themselves anymore. A population has the right to change the term being used for them.
regemo 3 years ago
yeah right ten percent of population
Which studies?¿?¿?¿?¿?¿?
One thing is your opinion and the other thing is your "studies".
Second...what is the difference between an homosexual and a pedophile?
If they have sex with people of the same sex (pedophiles also with "women"). So your society considers a pedophile a sexual deviant and a Homosexual a normal person because being homosexual is more accepted.
Third, the homosexuals forced with violent tactics the APA. PLEASE READ AND THEN TALK
Vatoxido 3 years ago
If I am asian do I live an asian way of life because of my facial features? What defines me as asian? Am I asian because I look asian, is it because i am part of the culture, is it because my genes are asian?
The definition I use is that a person is gay or bisexual if they have ever had thoughts of arousal to a person of the same sex. We do live in an age where the brain can be scanned to see when and to what sexual arousal is happening. Brain scanning will become more frequent.
regemo 3 years ago 2
What defines you as Asian legally is the place you were born?
Second, the excuse you are using is that Homosexuality is a preference.
That is a non accurate excuse because a Pedophile would use the same excuse as you. Also a serial killer. So if HOMOSEXUALITY is a preference how can you born with a preference.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
You do see a qualitavite difference though between consenting adults having sex and adults having sex with children though, no?
Look, if two gals who are both adults decide to have sex it simply doesn't effect anyone else. When an adult violates a child it does, as does murder. Surely you can't relate raping children and murder people to gay or lesbian sex?
Hellfireblogs 3 years ago
well in some cases children consent the pedophilia and because of that that doesn't mean that pedophilia should be accepted
Vatoxido 2 years ago
If homosexuals are in a good psychological state.
Why a great part of homosexuals lacked of a father's (Dad if is not understandable) love and they search for a man's love in adulthood by having this type of relationships with other men.
You should read something of Psychology to realize that Homosexuality is not a preference is a pathology.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
To put pedophilia in the same sentence as homosexuality is wrong to both gay people and children. Child abuse has nothing to do with two adults consenting to an action. You are exploiting abused children and insulting gay people.
Second, IMO if you have sexual thoughts about children (even for a min) but never act on them you are still a pedophile. If you have sexual thoughts about the opposite sex, u are either straight or bisexual. It's not preference, it's the way your brain works.
regemo 3 years ago
If it's because how your brain work why i haven't seen homosexual kids.
Well...in my country i haven't seen that and in your country?
Vatoxido 2 years ago
Two people in my family are psychologists. Most people growing up today lack a stable father in their life growing up. They still turn out to the same percentages of straight, bisexual, and gay as people who have a stable father.
It's a myth that if a father is too weak, or too violent, or not around enough that the child will be gay. All you need to do is look at gay people who had great fathers, and straight people who never had a father figure at all growing up.
regemo 3 years ago
About the father figures that's just a cause not the entire cause.
If two people of your family were psychologists why you didn't told that in the begining when i was talking about psychology.
Did they talk you that homosexuals are more propense to suicide?.
Well you should ask them.
Vatoxido 2 years ago
Did you know the profit of sex bussines and why is a coincidence that Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and the Rockefeller family are investing in this type of bussiness?
No, you didn't because you were watching the superbowl while you were eating a Big Mac.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
seriously you americans are really stupid.
You know about the profit of selling fetus for the production of vaccines and other products?
no, you don't know because Mtv doesn't say anything about this bussiness.
Did you know about Margaret Sanger(planned parenthood founder) was a racist and promiscuous women who talked about black people as: Stupid race or even a##holes?
NO, you americans didn' know because New york times didn't even mention the subject.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
come on you americans are really stupid.
you americans like harveystewart are americans that stay at home and believe everything that tv puts in front of your ignorant eyes.
so you are telling me that 50 years ago was the same sh#t?
You americans are so stupid and dumb ass that you can't even have common sense.
COME ON!!!!!! can't you see the sex bussiness that is behind?
do you think planned parenthood cares about freedom or the rights of women.
NOOOO!!! this is all about money$
Vatoxido 3 years ago
Part of the reason kids get molested is because no one understands why it happens. Kinsey should be thanked for doing what he did, and not be morally flagellated over it.
Ogawa47 3 years ago 2
Of course Ogawa47.
How would you feel after knowing that your father or your mother was molested by Kinsey?
Or even YOU?
Your answer would be the same?
THINK!!!
Why don't you try to be in the shoes of one of the molested kids?
Do you think your life would be normal after a man handles your genitals and penetrates by the rectum?
Try that and then we talk about it.
Vatoxido 3 years ago
I'm pretty sure Kinsey only did what was legal. If someone was stupid enough to allow themselves to be molested (and not even know about it, for God's sake?), it's their own damn fault. Child molestation is a preventable problem thanks to the psychological research that has gone into the topic. Kinsey learned about this stuff in order to educate close-minded morons like you.
If I got raped, I would blame myself or the jackass responsible for it. Not an entomologist who died fifty years ago.
Ogawa47 3 years ago
how can a child be to blame when they are molested? It is the adult family members duty to protect the children in the family. Not take advantage of them. A child is powerless & is often terrified from the threats that the molestor tells them. Blaming the child is just WRONG!
urbaandiultra 3 years ago
Vatoxido was speaking as though s/he was referring to an adult getting molested. What I don't understand is why people think Kinsey is responsible for child molestation. That was my point. Please read the bottom-line before you go making assumptions.
Ogawa47 3 years ago
So in your country even if the parents of the molested child gives permission to other person to have intercourse with their son, still is legal????
So, legaly an eight year's old boy is considered an adult to take this kind of decissions?? What a moron you are even if it was with the approval of the kid it's decission doesn't count because in this kind of experiments is needed a document in which the test subject (an adult) signs that he approves the experiment.
ONLY IF HE IS AN ADULT!!!
Vatoxido 3 years ago
I'm sorry - at what point did I say anything along that line? There is no proof anywhere that says Kinsey ever had sex with children. Is it so wrong for someone to wonder why it happens? All you conservative pissants sit around whining about child molestation without providing a solution. A guy tries to educate people about their basest of instincts and he might as well be given the death penalty. What the fuck is wrong with you idiots?
Ogawa47 3 years ago
ok you are right.
you should be molested with the intention
of proving that pedophilia is something wrong.
Oh! Sorry i am so close-minded that i can't enjoy screwing 4 year's old kids like you.
OH!!!!
I SHOULD BE OF OPEN MIND LIKE KINSEY.
Yes i am a close minded moron that doesn't enjoy what you approve.
SOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRYYYYYYY
Vatoxido 3 years ago
man kinsey should have been executed for this, early 19th century to its middle years america the superpower was being played from the inside, the very thing, their ancestors fought is the very thing they are becoming right now... pitiful, soon that country will go down to the pit for their mistakes if the people continue to blind themselves, just like any empire it will decline
ouano1 3 years ago
Kinsey is evil. What he did was unconscionable, and his victims of his "revolution", are still paying for his crimes. Any support for him is wrong. Period.
Stop celebrating perversion. Stop worshiping science. Find God, and realize that you are a sinner.
Realize that Playboy, which is evil, would not have been, without this so-called "research".
xistntial 3 years ago
Kinsey was not the first to research sexuality. German psychologists were writing about it in the days before Hitler. The Germans were not prudish about sex, and they saw Kinsey's research as silly and wastefull. Kinsey didn't visit Germany, and I doubt he liked dealing with foreign academics.
He was also a racist.
MondoBeno 3 years ago
Why did Rockefeller Pay for this he paid for UN Too ! The rich want what they cant have ,always more evil,
louis12346 3 years ago
sooo. who is doing this cover up 4 kinsey. It just doesnt make sense that all of this has happened and other pedophile scientists hid it 4 him and no1 blew the whistle? and now porn is bad 4 the american public bcuz kinsey supported it? this sounds like these ppl are against porn homosexuals and abortiona laws and by dicrediting kinseythey can say that all of these things r bad 4 the american society. shame on these documentarians 4 their irresponisble research
allenanb 3 years ago
Dr. Reisman is is a moral dinosaur and her critiques of Kinsey are highly distorted.
SG1986 3 years ago 6
@SG1986 You will die for stating such a lie.
astrolifter 1 year ago
This is total BS.Kinsey and company only reported what was already happening in the sexual lives of those who consented to give their sexual histories.Of course they also engaged in sexual activity with each other, but to insist that Kinsey and the others condoned and participated in pedophilia is complete BS.People are such hypocritical scaredy cats - afraid of themselves more than anything else. I may not be able to articulate it fully - but self imposed ignorance is essential for acceptance.
gray70 3 years ago 4
@gray70 Stop sticking up for Kinsey you mercenary cocksucker.
astrolifter 1 year ago
So basically your whole point is this: Kinsey is responsible for acceptance of sexual diversity, the freedom to make pornography, and better abortion laws. And somehow, in your messed up world all of this is supposed to be a bad thing? Oh, and also that he was a pedophile because he said their was nothing wrong with children getting sexual urges. Yeah, you're not a bunch of old paranoid squares.
harveystewart 3 years ago 4
We have school shootings, child sex offenders (children who molest other children), and inner city children growing up with no fathers but plenty of "uncles" (who sometimes abuse the children). Even 30 years ago, movies (Pretty Baby and Taxi Driver) cast pre-teen girls as prostitutes. 1 in 4 girls is raped or sexually abused by adulthood. Abortion is accepted, but executing child rapists is considered cruel punishment. Something has gone seriously wrong in the past 50 years.
quemacha 3 years ago
Um, actually, statistically speaking, children are much safer than they were fifty years ago from sexual predators. The difference is that nowadays we more freely talk about these things. I'm not against this, but it does seem to have the side effect of making people paranoid. It probably has to do the way the information is sensationalized by the media. As for your last comment, what has gone wrong in the last fifty years exactly? (cont'd on next post)
harveystewart 3 years ago
Statistically, 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys is sexually assaulted by their 18th birthday. That is just what is reported.
The sad thing is that those statistics are reflected in the % of people I know personally who were sexually abused as children. So it's not paranoia or propaganda. Children are no safer these days, with the advent of the internet and the ability to gather information, than they were 50 years ago. I'd say it's gotten worse.
DodiaFae 3 years ago
True
Hellfireblogs 3 years ago
Was it giving black people equal rights? Or perhaps it was decriminalizing homosexuality? Or not forcing all women to be stay at home moms? We've made some amazing strides in the last fifty years, but you think things have gotten worse because a criminal has more rights than a pile of cells? Get real.
harveystewart 3 years ago
What went wrong in part was the sexual revolution's attack on black fatherhood. I've worked for years in inner city Miami's black community and I have heard their sentiments. Young men will use their agression to be either protectors (faithful husbands and fathers) or predators (thugs and baby daddies). Easy sex inspires the latter; chastity and fidelity inspires the former.
quemacha 3 years ago
pornography doesn't hurt anyone. And even if it did, Kinsey wasn't a pornographer. So saying Hugh Heffner agreed with him is useless.
harveystewart 3 years ago
Th film adresses his interviews with pedophiles. Maybe you could watch past the first five minutes. And working with pedophiles to gather information about the way their mind works doesn't mean that he's a child molester. Police do it all the time to track child molesters.
harveystewart 3 years ago
WHAT?! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! Do you not see the irony in insisting that Kinsey was linked to a child rapist based on the child rapist's own testimony? My god. You guys are really getting desperate.
harveystewart 3 years ago
Again, not children, adult recalling their childhood. That's why number isn't specific. Logic people. It's called logic!
harveystewart 3 years ago
Leave it to morons to turn this issue around and make it about race and religion.
You Jew hating gay bashing morons need to be systematically exterminated like the cockroaches you are.
ohnoher 3 years ago 4
Kinsey's data was skewed.... correct. But understand this: Sexual depravity is the natural state of the male animal and has been at the core of the downfall of most prior civilizations. Given absolute sexual freedom without any social or moral restraints, most men will screw anything and EVERYTHING! will Judaism placed sexuality into the context of marriage between a man and a woman in order to preserve a civil and prosperous society. This is not a religious statement, just a fact.
mm3861 3 years ago
Are you kidding me?!? Some people are turing this into a racist/politcal/religous issue?! Really?!?! This pervert participated in crimes against children!!! And then called it scientific and it was ok. I don't care what race, religion, politcal party, sexual orientation you are. As human beings we should be outraged at this! And that this man's "research" is now the basis for laws and sex ed quidelines. Please! Can't we just stop and use our brains for once?!
5newps1995 3 years ago
Now I understand why "Planned Parenthood" is more interested in abortions for young girls than sending the criminals who committed rape to jail.
joy31608 3 years ago
You obviously don't know a god damn thing about Planned Parenthood.
ohnoher 3 years ago
Ouch--looks like I hit a nerve.
As a matter of fact I'm intimately aware of Planned Parenthood.
joy31608 3 years ago
He/she, who controls sexuality in public, controls the world.
He = Kinsey
She =Reisman
TengriAsura 3 years ago
what is up with the anti-semitism expressed in many of these comments? dr. reisman has done a wonderful service to the entire world - only a demon possessed pedophile or pedophile lover would discount her objective observations. keep up the good work judith and may God bless the children.
obvioustruths 3 years ago
This movie that will be out or is out will increase the sexually insanity & perhaps all the religous insanity as I can see. religion is created & controlled by man/government, therefore it's rediculous to critize one group or another. They all work together for the World Bank in oder to tear apart any normality the "slaves" (income tax payers) may have. I hope this bring this evil to the light so it can be healed.
Flowercity 3 years ago
Remember that Dr Green and Dr Greenberg is the Nazi, Josef Mengele who has bought over to the U.S by Operation Paper via the Roman Catholic Priest, Krusoslav Dragonovic and his ratlines. All protected by the Vatican and their British Intelligence. British Intelligence then created the CIA by merging most of the O.S.S with the Gestapo. All funded behind the scenes using stolen Judiac money from the Holocaust.
anunnaki2006 3 years ago
Fuck the Zionist PIGS!!!!!
perry911 3 years ago
I think Judith Levine (not Reisman) is a better figure than Reisman or Kinsey. She is the one who wrote, Harmful to Minors which has a theme of decently speculating on both extreme sides of sex-issues in society and politics.
TengriAsura 3 years ago
Typical right-wing, repressing sexuality shiite. Sorry I wasted a few minutes watching it. Not even worth mentioning to friends for chuckles.
kd7711 3 years ago
Is that your repressed conscience I hear in the background?
joroma77 3 years ago
these hate the messenger remarks sound like people who are themselves part of the problem, no surprise.
gellernter 3 years ago
wtf are you talking about 'Jews' want to do this? where are Jews even mentioned in this documentary?
jannonymous 3 years ago
Judith Reisman is a hero.
prahudka 3 years ago
A bit off topic though: this whole "Judith Reisman vs. Alfred Kinsey" may be a sign of decaying of western civilization.
TengriAsura 3 years ago
I was always skeptical about Kinsey's claims. It's good that sex isn't the tabu anymore that it once was, but the pendulum has swung too far to the other extreme. The ubiquituousness of porn has turned society into a bunch of perverts. JMO.
youcomeon9 3 years ago
Right on. But. Sex is supposed to be taboo. Why? It's a matter between husband and wife, not an exhibition for the masses. We shouldn't talk so much sex, just have it, and within marriage I might add. Above all it's a procreation act, isn't it?
joroma77 3 years ago
No, sex should no be a taboo subject. It's a good thing that we can now discuss sexual problems, etc. but it's gone too far; it's turned into an obsession. I do not agree that sex needs to be restricted to marriage only, and it's not just for procreation, either.
youcomeon9 3 years ago