Liberals do understand this (at least some) and this is why they want this to happen. They want to take all our money so they don't have to work. These people will take the shirt off your back if they want it and you aren't looking. Sadly the system socialists oppose (the current one) is a socialist government, I don't think many realise this. These people hate anyone with more money than themselves.
Peter is going to have to focus on this election and begin to work harder if he is going to succeed. He needs to use his internet fame to get on more shows like this one, except next time not be surprised by any question that is asked by snarky interviewers
The first questioner clearly detests Libertarianism, it was obvious the way he kept pecking his question. I think people like him and Odonnell only help Peter, because Peter always remains cordial when he's attacked. This is actually what people will notice most.
Not too bad of a performance for the cards being stacked against him. People who aren't too familiar with Peter's commentaries, please check out watch?v=AIcfMMVcYZg. Peter takes some time to refine his response to the GI question which caught him off guard.
i think the reporters did their job well. they voiced the same concerns the average voter might have of schiff's polices, giving peter a chance to explain. i just wish the MSM reporters were as critical of obama's policies.
I think that reporters need to report and not distort. Their questions were loaded and not posed in a neutral manner. I thought it was obvious that the guys asking the questions were Liberals who think that without the government we'd all still be living in the stone age. Note the aggressive tone of the gentleman asking the GI bill question. See Peter's video blog where he answers that question after having more than a few seconds to respond @ /watch?v=AIcfMMVcYZg
aren't those two guys more like commentators/columnists than reporters? at any rate, i think the days of "objective" reporting are numbered. no one believes reporters are unbiased any more so they might as well all come out of the closet.
I'm not really sure who they are, I don't live in CT. I hope those days aren't numbered, but I am afraid that they are numbered. There are a few guys out there who are unbiased, but they aren't Americans. They should have to have a disclaimer, "all of our comments are opinions and not based on facts but flawed ideologies and hearsay"
The GI bill guy is a total fool. He'd fail 7th grade debate class.
dskillz1 1 year ago
Watch the guy on the right's movements. I think he is gay. No joke.
Thrice13 2 years ago
Holy cow; that guy on the right is smug.
CountArtha 2 years ago 2
Local mainstream media smear campaign right here baby. Digging up dirt on Peter by attacking his father, crap news media.
residentzombie 2 years ago
There is no such thing as Government money, liberals don't understand this premise.
Government redistributes tax payers money, I am the best judge of how to spend or save my own money!
genusrightwingus 2 years ago 5
Liberals do understand this (at least some) and this is why they want this to happen. They want to take all our money so they don't have to work. These people will take the shirt off your back if they want it and you aren't looking. Sadly the system socialists oppose (the current one) is a socialist government, I don't think many realise this. These people hate anyone with more money than themselves.
residentzombie 2 years ago
That would be sweet!
sink Dodd!
genusrightwingus 2 years ago
lol, are those clowns the best they could get, nice one peter
texxta 2 years ago
Gotta love how he's used to being doubted, and whips em right back! Schiff for Senate!!! 2010!!!
Free Market Capitalism!
christinagomez 2 years ago
Reminds of Tim Russert interviewing Ron Paul asking questions about the Civil War
358Liberty 2 years ago 3
ron paul should be president
obama and bush should be on jail
hyylo 2 years ago
anyone know where pt 3 is?
radiatethecorruption 2 years ago
I wonder who the flaming liberal "journalist" on the right votes for every election.
Peter Schiff would get elected easily in any red or battleground state, hope he can do it Connecticut...they did elect center-left Lieberman!
RuflessRecords 2 years ago
Peter is going to have to focus on this election and begin to work harder if he is going to succeed. He needs to use his internet fame to get on more shows like this one, except next time not be surprised by any question that is asked by snarky interviewers
robrigo80 2 years ago
The first questioner clearly detests Libertarianism, it was obvious the way he kept pecking his question. I think people like him and Odonnell only help Peter, because Peter always remains cordial when he's attacked. This is actually what people will notice most.
LisaJ4Liberty 2 years ago 2
fuck that dudes questions were the shitist questions ever, totally fucken irrelivant
danbuck333 2 years ago
Whats with these guys trying to blindside peter with these questions?
How would Peter know how to vote on a bill made 20+ years before he was born?
flclfanman 2 years ago
where did they get these 2 fags with cucumbers up their ass to ask question.
"peter, would you support a bill passe din 1813 if you would be elected"?
Dkouts57 2 years ago 2
Not too bad of a performance for the cards being stacked against him. People who aren't too familiar with Peter's commentaries, please check out watch?v=AIcfMMVcYZg. Peter takes some time to refine his response to the GI question which caught him off guard.
lewisfiecke 2 years ago
fuck those reporters are duds.
ThebigTH 2 years ago
i think the reporters did their job well. they voiced the same concerns the average voter might have of schiff's polices, giving peter a chance to explain. i just wish the MSM reporters were as critical of obama's policies.
michaelpshipley1 2 years ago
I think that reporters need to report and not distort. Their questions were loaded and not posed in a neutral manner. I thought it was obvious that the guys asking the questions were Liberals who think that without the government we'd all still be living in the stone age. Note the aggressive tone of the gentleman asking the GI bill question. See Peter's video blog where he answers that question after having more than a few seconds to respond @ /watch?v=AIcfMMVcYZg
lewisfiecke 2 years ago
aren't those two guys more like commentators/columnists than reporters? at any rate, i think the days of "objective" reporting are numbered. no one believes reporters are unbiased any more so they might as well all come out of the closet.
michaelpshipley1 2 years ago
I'm not really sure who they are, I don't live in CT. I hope those days aren't numbered, but I am afraid that they are numbered. There are a few guys out there who are unbiased, but they aren't Americans. They should have to have a disclaimer, "all of our comments are opinions and not based on facts but flawed ideologies and hearsay"
lewisfiecke 2 years ago
Thanks for posting!
Uh oh. There's that GI bill question. That was a bit hostile...
MengersDisciple 2 years ago