First off the referees are not allowed to go against any particullar team because if they did they would get fired and they wouldn't be on the ice calling games so that isn't the case. Second when you see the initial play when the goalie shoveled it out at the end it looked like part of his glove is sitting on the goal line so you can't say goal because you don't know where under the glove the puck is it could be in or it can be sitting on the line and the puck has to cross completely.
It's no goal because the ref originally said no goal and in order to get the call reversed there has to be conclusive evidence that the puck went in the net and in all those replays you can't tell where that puck is.
Its the referee on the ice who rules it goal or not. Only after conclusive evidence the puck crossed the goal line. The call can be reversed. That means the puck MUST be visible crosses completely over the line. BTW: On penalty shots and shootouts, if the pucks forward motion is stopped on the attempt, no rebounds like in soccer.
Am I the only one that thinks that there should have NEVER been a penalty shot in the first place? When Stamkos was on the breakaway the defenseman hit the PUCK first before knocking Stamkos down. You can clearly see him knock Stamkos' stick resulting in the pick being knocked away puck away.
there was no conclusive evidence that the puck went over the line, the glove was over but that doesnt mean nething, u have to see the puck in order to delare a goal! i agree with the refs no goal!
The puck goes into Lehtonen's glove while his whole glove is behind the line, and yet it's not a goal because the refs literally can't see it? Wow. I guess they use quantum physics to determine goal validity. I bet NHL refs have a great time at magic shows. Where is the bunny? Is it in the hat?! No! It's in the back of the net.
After rewatching the vid its really funny to see a fan mainly a fan of a crap team get mad so much over a goal and saying the refs ruined there season because they didn't get this one call there way lol.... I'm sure this is the reason tampa sucked all year lolololol..... and yes lets fire all the refs for 1 mistake against the almight tampa lightning..
Why are lightning fans complaining? lol... They could've had made their choice between tavares or hedman if they lost more.. so rly the refs were helping them.. It's pretty sad you drafted the 1st pick last year have lecavallier and st.louis signed so many guys overpaid for malone and are still the 2nd worst in the league..
ok, if u watch a few tampa bay games, the refs are trying to KILL the lighting. im a fan of tampa, and i watch all of their games (i got the centre ice pack) and so i would no how many times a ref tried to make tampa lose.
It doesnt matter if it's in the glove either? They have to SEE the puck over the line to make a goal. And there is no such evidence of that. Right?
ThaAngelus1 6 months ago
@ziebler
what happened to logic?
NoClue1472 9 months ago
First off the referees are not allowed to go against any particullar team because if they did they would get fired and they wouldn't be on the ice calling games so that isn't the case. Second when you see the initial play when the goalie shoveled it out at the end it looked like part of his glove is sitting on the goal line so you can't say goal because you don't know where under the glove the puck is it could be in or it can be sitting on the line and the puck has to cross completely.
DUPioneerHockeyFan 1 year ago
It's no goal because the ref originally said no goal and in order to get the call reversed there has to be conclusive evidence that the puck went in the net and in all those replays you can't tell where that puck is.
DUPioneerHockeyFan 1 year ago
That was in freiken ref
sportsman1441 1 year ago
Its the referee on the ice who rules it goal or not. Only after conclusive evidence the puck crossed the goal line. The call can be reversed. That means the puck MUST be visible crosses completely over the line. BTW: On penalty shots and shootouts, if the pucks forward motion is stopped on the attempt, no rebounds like in soccer.
Signed,
Dean of the Maple Leafs Nation.
BTW: GO LEAFS GO !
mapleleafsforever 1 year ago
Am I the only one that thinks that there should have NEVER been a penalty shot in the first place? When Stamkos was on the breakaway the defenseman hit the PUCK first before knocking Stamkos down. You can clearly see him knock Stamkos' stick resulting in the pick being knocked away puck away.
There should have never been a penalty shot.
TheHockeyCentral 1 year ago
@TheHockeyCentral ya he also wasnt passed the d completely so the shot should never have been awarded
Synergy9211 1 year ago
I saw it. NO GOAL!! It was on his sleeve, not in the glove. So the refs made a good call.
IceHero1991 1 year ago
good goal.
ChopperCity47 1 year ago
ok this was a legit no goal...you want to see a war room fail look at steve ott on the wings in a shootout counted a goal
FeenixxCustoms 1 year ago
he should of shot it higher
MrPlzsub2me 1 year ago
100% clean goal
ChopperCity47 1 year ago
Stamkos should have pulled the trigger sooner great move but he let Kari back and Kari got lucky
zackallen2 2 years ago
there was no conclusive evidence that the puck went over the line, the glove was over but that doesnt mean nething, u have to see the puck in order to delare a goal! i agree with the refs no goal!
maddogmatt44 2 years ago
@maddogmatt44 : concur
mapleleafsforever 2 years ago
nice save.
TheJokkepappa69 2 years ago
Well, in all fairness, you can't be 100% sure if it's in the net or not. And when you can't do that, you can't call it a goal. That's the rule.
Nevahood1 2 years ago 2
The puck goes into Lehtonen's glove while his whole glove is behind the line, and yet it's not a goal because the refs literally can't see it? Wow. I guess they use quantum physics to determine goal validity. I bet NHL refs have a great time at magic shows. Where is the bunny? Is it in the hat?! No! It's in the back of the net.
phongnasty 2 years ago
goal for sure.
bishoppx 2 years ago
After rewatching the vid its really funny to see a fan mainly a fan of a crap team get mad so much over a goal and saying the refs ruined there season because they didn't get this one call there way lol.... I'm sure this is the reason tampa sucked all year lolololol..... and yes lets fire all the refs for 1 mistake against the almight tampa lightning..
VmanAK47 2 years ago
Why are lightning fans complaining? lol... They could've had made their choice between tavares or hedman if they lost more.. so rly the refs were helping them.. It's pretty sad you drafted the 1st pick last year have lecavallier and st.louis signed so many guys overpaid for malone and are still the 2nd worst in the league..
VmanAK47 2 years ago
lmao this video is hilarious!
epic80s 2 years ago
those refs r from pittsburgh
tnt181 2 years ago
ok, if u watch a few tampa bay games, the refs are trying to KILL the lighting. im a fan of tampa, and i watch all of their games (i got the centre ice pack) and so i would no how many times a ref tried to make tampa lose.
RunescapePreist001 2 years ago 4
WORST CALL EVER!
CitizenXSoldier 2 years ago 2
that was'nt a shootout attempt................
thera1827 2 years ago 2
I was there and can tell you that the puck was not IN the pocket of his glove. It was almost up his sleeve, which was not over the line.
dr3amsofglass 2 years ago 5
If you're right then why did the NHL issue an apology today (Friday) to the Lightning for blowing that call?
NoleMan007 2 years ago
Do you have a link for that? I'm not arguing with you, I just never saw it and would like to.
dr3amsofglass 2 years ago 3
how can you even tell the puck was "in his sleeve?"
imnotaqueer 2 years ago
i think i believe u cuz the puck did get shot up his sleeve
tfkrulz45 2 years ago
Bettman, Refs and Toronto Warroom should all be shot
uk70sprogrock 3 years ago 2