Anarchism & Marxism Part 1

[EmotionalIntrovert]

Leftist women tend to be hot.

[MrGreeneggsnham]

@EmotionalIntrovert Janeane Garofalo, lol

[Pulchism]

wearing a scarf indoors is silly

[PtAltmVansanTarr]

@7:00 good analysis of American left with it's focus on activist govt

[PtAltmVansanTarr]

Why are the radicals drinking Pepsi?

[Neighb0urhoodWatch]

@PtAltmVansanTarr Whats your point?

[Erlind255]

Nothing more than a bunch of hypocrites. Theoretically condemning international corporations, practically drinking Starbucks and Pepsi!!! 

[lolpizza14]

@Erlind255 dude your right!

[johnmickle]

@Erlind255 Are they suppose to concoct their own sodas? Drinking a Pepsi doesn't contradict your political affiliations or orientation.

[Erlind255]

@johnmickle People reveal they true views about politics by their conduct, not by what they jabber. By just drinking Starbucks, they support it. If you are a filthy consumerist yourself, why would you condemn consumerist lifestyle???

[johnmickle]

@Erlind255 You are a consumer, face it. We live in a consumption based society, it's just how it works. Unless you're sitting naked in a house that you built yourself living off of carrots that you grew in your garden, you are dependant on consumerism. If you drive a car, own a computer, wear clothes, eat food, ect you are supporting consumerism. Why does the IWW even bother with having a starbucks union? If the employees there are just uncool phonies and not true anarchists like you?

[Erlind255]

@johnmickle I am going to ask you a straightforward question... Why do you even bother watching a lecture about anarchism or communism?

What you just said, shows that the distribution of wealth is impossible in a capitalist society and people will never get bored from consumerism. Your beliefs profoundly contrast both Marxist and Anarchist ideology.

[johnmickle]

@Erlind255 What 'beliefs' of mine? All I've stated is that everyone is a consumer, including you. Don't lie, you're not fooling anybody. Did you build your car yourself? Did you mine the sillicon and build your computer yourself? Do you make your own clothes, grow your own coffee beans, and eat only food you grow? Grow the fuck up and lose the dogma. I'm a member of the WSA and IWW, what exactly do you do for the cause?

[Erlind255]

@johnmickle wow! Do you want me to applause you for wasting your time with organizations that no one gives a shit??? Name me one achievement that IWW have done during these last 10 years? NOTHING! Just jabbering nonsense, degrading Marxism, and wasting the precious time of the members.

I never said that I am not a consumerist. But the point is that I am first a citizen, I am a social being, a person who enjoys reading books for their intellectual benefit and artistic beauty.

[johnmickle]

@Erlind255 The IWW has created numerous co-operatives and unions over the last decade. They created a Starbucks union which resulted in a strike. They aren't irrelevant and they advocate direct action against employers and the state, this doesn't exactly degrade marxism. Wasting your time with childish shit like condemning revolutionaries for drinking a Pepsi doesn't get you further than creating self managed industry.

[Erlind255]

@johnmickle At the end I am a consumerist. I never felt enthusiastic or went through ecstasy because I would consume something. I consume something because my body requires it, not because I choose so. In fact I am very poor, and very happy. I do not even want more money, as long as I have enough to live. The PC that I am writing is not even mine.

Tell me one reason why would a person drink Starbucks, which has the most expensive coffee's? The answer is clear: "SNOBBERY"!

[agapeiron]

@Erlind255 I am drinking Pepsi right now (for caffeine; the taste is mediocre), so does that mean I love corporate capitalism?

By your definition, just putting on a pair of jeans means adopting a consumerist "lifestyle." Can you define this idea of "lifestyle" for us? Or are you just saying anti-capitalists should not consume goods produced in capitalist societies?! The latter is absurd.

[GodOfTheInternets]

@Erlind255

Yeah! And they make use of roads, which the GOVERNMENT built!

[havok4]

Go Pepsi, Odwalla, and Starbucks!

[PositivelyBored]

@havok4

That's not Starbucks, it's Green Mountain Coffee and Vermont is a socialist U.S. State. :)

[STOPG20]

viva el anarqia !!!

[finishstrongdoc]

Americans don't labor under the illusion that "the state is somehow bad" as the speaker said, but there is a big difference between a State governing OF, BY & FOR the people and the State governing the people. The state should protect the Law-Abiding from the criminal. We are a nation ruled by laws, not men. Bad laws enable bad men to lead good men into evil ways. Socialism is a bad, failed project, always led by bad men who lead good men to ruin.Matter isn't all that matters.

[agapeiron]

@finishstrongdoc States generally do not govern for the people, but for the wealthy and powerful. If the state took protecting people from criminals seriously, it would be at war with itself, because it is composed of cynical elitists and cronies for the business community. Your characterization of socialism-- a broad tradition-- is extremely narrow, but I agree if you are referring to the Stalinist models of undemocratic dictatorship of the 20th century.

[sauron170]

long live communism and anarchism

long live the working class

[TuffLuck777]

@sauron170 You and people like you should hold classes like these in front of refugees who fled communist countries to convince them that they just misunderstand communism. 

[agapeiron]

@TuffLuck777 Some of the people in this video are from "communist" (Stalinist/Titoist) countries. You and people like you should grow the fuck up and educate yourselves about the difference between Stalinism and libertarian socialism. If only for the sake of your Cold War rhetoric; it will make your reactionary quips a little less impotent.

[TuffLuck777]

@agapeiron The funniest shit by far is the narrow eyed wirey “self proclaimed anarchist” women. She would be the first victim in a lawless anarchist environment; who the hell is she going to stop when some fellow anarchist wants to rob her ass and take her stinky pinky…. Enjoy your bucket of freedom!

[agapeiron]

@TuffLuck777 Who said that anarchists propose a lawless environment? I think you misunderstand some of the fundamental principles of anarchism. What anarchist thinkers have you read that advocate, say, random rapes and aggression because it is pleasant?

[TuffLuck777]

@agapeiron In the back of that commie noggin of yours you know you’re a coward; and you know why, because you don’t have the balls to travel to those countries and stay to profess your allegiance publicly and “continue the commie fight” with as much passion as you do here in the U.S. Your student ass would be rounded up in the middle of the night by the secret police and never heard from again.

[agapeiron]

@TuffLuck777 Where did I defend any of the Stalinist countries? You are attacking a straw man.

[TuffLuck777]

@agapeiron If those jokers in the video are from those countries like you claim, then why are they not OVER THERE being a “revolutionary for the “cause”! You certainly are a sharp one with your snide clever (U.S. educated) ‘quips’. I couldn’t POSSIBLY began to fathom the oh so righteous communist/ anarchist philosophy you clutch to your chest so dearly; it’s all for the working class of course!

[agapeiron]

@TuffLuck777 First of all, they are Slovenian. Titoism has been off the agenda in Yugoslavia for quite some time (though you probably think the Cold War is still going on). Second, if they are anarchists, why would they want to further the aims of a quasi-Stalinist state bureaucracy? Do you know the difference? Anarchists have been enemies of Stalinism longer than you have. And what is it about anarchist thought that makes you think it is not for the working class?

[agapeiron]

@TuffLuck777 Also, what makes you think Grubacic, for example, isn't from ex-Yugoslavia? Did you not detect his accent?

[agapeiron]

And certainly my quips are US-educated. Does it surprise you that one can be politically radical and patriotic? The Wobblies are more American, even as internationalists, than you any day.

I am more of an American than you because I am not a boot-licking worshiper of state power. You on the other hand are a vulgar reactionary douche bag with no love of liberty, with a hatred of free thinking, and with a cynical view of working class people.

Now go work on more straw man arguments.

[TuffLuck777]

@agapeiron Wow, the hostility! You are pretty riled up about your "Stalinism libertarian titobandito libertard socialism" thing you got goin on!  You know what I don't get about you 'useful idiots' as Stalin used to refer to you people; it’s the fact that you are so brave to spew your vomit behind the protection of a “evil capitalist” countries walls instead of places where they’ll really appreciate your rhetoric like China, Russia or better yet North Korea!?

[agapeiron]

@TuffLuck777 On the contrary I don't think my "rhetoric" about mutual aid, workers councils and self-management etc. would be appreciated in China or North Korea. However, Russia is no longer Stalinist, because it is 2011. Did you not get the note?

[TuffLuck777]

@sauron170 Yes, long live the slave labor camps of China,and North Korea!!! Long live the ruling working class of those countries!

[dubified89]

I say keep anarchism pure, don't synthesize it

[seigneurvoland666]

@dubified89 but mah friend, everything eventually get's synthesized ;)

[smolny1917]

@shadowgeyser The end result of Marxism is a classless, stateless society but the means of achieving it is a social revolution that overthrows the capitalists from power, and a workers state that suppresses the capitalist until conditions of material abundance make capitalists impossible. In other words, Marxism doesn't separate the end goal from the means. Anarchists want the classless society but have a superstitious fear of state power making them impotent to lead the working class to power.

[crazybasement]

@smolny1917

su·per·sti·tion (spr-stshn)

n.

1. An irrational belief that an object, action, or circumstance not logically related to a course of events influences its outcome.

2.

a. A belief, practice, or rite irrationally maintained by ignorance of the laws of nature or by faith in magic or chance.

b. A fearful or abject state of mind resulting from such ignorance or irrationality.

c. Idolatry.

[crazybasement]

@smolny1917 Now take a look at history and tell me that state power is not a long list of violence, oppression, genocide, totalitarianism, and murder.

[Gusty85]

marxism has have its chances . fucked it up major, move on towards anarchism and we will have true communism.

[arzoyan]

A moneyless,classless,stateless communities of humanity expressing our freedom in creative harmonious cooperation for a world that is so POTENTIALLY AND ACTUALLY nourishing. Capitalism in any form, Statist or Corporatist is the denial of our common humanity in a politically manipulated,tyrannical armed MARKET SYSYTEM of artificial scarcity that is designed to perpetuate the enslavement of immense humanity for the material interest of the criminal ruling elite

[seigneurvoland666]

lol pepsi bottle

[dubified89]

@seigneurvoland666 Do you think it's less supportive of exploitation to buy generic products such as soda than it is supporting the major corporations? Curious

[seigneurvoland666]

@dubified89 lol exploitation is a loaded term but in the generic sense it's almost impossible to not support exploitation. ANyway, to answer your question, i think it is less supportive to buy small business beverages. While resisting and living in the system of capitalism, hypocrisy is right on your tail !

[MD40LD50]

you arnt even american you fucking dog shit...you are worthless and should be shot in the fucking head with ur red buddies.........you are a complete idiot that has not even the first clue of what you talk about.......i hope every single red you know dies a very very slow cancer death......

[MD40LD50]

you arnt even american you fucking dog shit...you are worthless and should be shot in the fucking head with ur red buddies.........you are a complete idiot that has not even the first clue of what you talk about.......i hope every single red you know dies a very very slow cancer death

[smolny1917]

I was disappointed after five minutes but watched the whole thing looking for something redeeming to no avail. This panel discussion should have been called "The EZLN and the Anarchists Who Love Them". I don't recommend this for anybody looking for a serious discussion of the differences between Marxism and Anarchists.

[JasonDamisch]

I am 100% against the political left. I am counter revolutionary. I am reactionary. Civilization is War. It is the great war to create a singularity. It is war against Mother Earth and Father Time. Socialism is a more extreme, more violent, more oppressive and more evil form of capitalism. I would rather go to a concentration camp than go back to college. I am the eternal enemy of Anarchism and Marxism. Socialism is the completion of civilization, which is death.

[666IRONMAN666]

mmmmmmm pepsi goes down great with hypocrisy! :)

[RagoBiscuit]

hahaha cidseven thank you for the youtube comment of the year - "I know more about history and human psychology than karl marx and lenin did,"

they are two of the most influential political theorists/philosophers/sociolo­gists of the modern epoch, and you are? where is your three volume analysis of the dynamics of capitalist society? or detailed notes on the hegelian system? or revolutionising of historical analysis?

a child prodigy who was dropped on his head no doubt

[xdeadxtreex]

this video should be titled 'anarchism, marxism, and product placement' for the pepsi bottle there

[MrSpieldose]

Marxism sucks ass!!

[celticraider1]

Marxism is a smoke screen/tool used by those with all the power and money, to make themselves more powerfull and richer, you can see this with Russia, a few are mega rich and the majority are mega poor...............marxism is a con job!

[celticraider1]

We need national socialism, communism and multiculturalism is the road to white European extinction as we know it.......................commu­nism/marxism will do us no favours!

[patient0Studios]

buddha, we Canadians are attempting to organize a similar event. Can you put me in touch with some of the organizers or people "in the know"?

[xNervousxBrainx]

* sponsored by pepsi.

Revolution, Just do it!

thanks for the upload!

[SamSpade2010]

Buffoons in black.

[gosmokesome]

taxation is theft and immoral :D

[cidseven]

@gosmokesome It is immoral theft.......until someone tries to invade your country, kill the men, enslave the children and rape the women.

Then suddenly all that tax money gone into equipping and training a regular army suddenly was worth it afterall.

Marxists are a group of brainless, useless sheep in a world full of ferocious and hungry wolves.

[marsCubed]

@cidseven Conservatives want tax for armies you fool. & Govt run by corps for fierce competition. which is what leads to wars. when they say no tax.. they just mean no welfare so the poor die.

Your position is the most ugly & nasty of all.

Tax is used tor roads, the fire service, education, health.

Denmark has highest tax on the rich in the world, it has led to the most equal and wealthy population on the planet. low crime, innovative.

co-cooperating works.

It's conservative states that crashed.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed Of course they want to tax people for armies, how else are they going to get the money to arm and train them?

While not all taxes are obviously fun, taxes that help the armed forces are awesome and logical.

The government is run by corporations? wtf? you idiot.

What leads to wars is people trying to rule other people, often on stupid grounds.

Denmark is not the most equal nor wealthy population on the planet. It is a great country, but it is not that.

[marsCubed]

@cidseven

Denmark, Norway and similar, in Northern Europe have the the most Equal and Wealthy populations on Earth. They have the highest tax on the top 5%.

War is hyper-competition, Hitler's munitions were even named after corp logos.

The right want Govt by corps. that is what deregulation means; corp rule.

You saw glossy vids by segregationists & far-right on YT; Propaganda for private property elites. anti-democracy, pro-inequality.

Your argument makes you a ranting idiot corp stooge.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed Yes, but your error is that you assume that their success is simply due to the implementation of socialist policies. Northern European countries typically have small, yet, intelligent populations that have produced sophisticated and civilized cultures. Compare this to the peoples of africa and latin america etc, and really, taxing the rich there won't really help much.

Corps didn't rule Nazi germany, what are you talking about?

[marsCubed]

@cidseven Nazi munitions were even named after corporate logos..

After the crash of '29, United banking corp, Unilever, IBM.. etc, poured money into Germany, Hitler was the thug that got their profits rolling again.. by smashing unions and deregulating so slaves could be used. Germany became an obscenity of profiteering. Nazis ended welfare so "the weak did not hold back the strong". It was hyper conservatism gone mad.

Another term for fascism is corporate state. Nazis were peasant boss thugs.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed which munitions and which coporate logos?

This 'smashing' of the 'unions' you refer to was the rejection of communism by German patriots. The Nazis were proponents of autarky, so they clearly we not part of an international coporate conspiracy.

Fascist corporitism, isn't the same as capitalist corporatism you fool. The Nazis were smarter than you.

[marsCubed]

@cidseven

Corps like; messerschmitt, Focke-Wulf, Junkers, Heinkel to give just a few examples from aviation.

I see your friend on your channel is a BNP member, that's a Nazi organization. They even have a wing named after Adolph Hitler.

watch?v=04QolIvfQEw

Nazis smashed Unions, Nazis famously were unable to recruit workers. thus they 'took the provinces' ie, peasants & criminals.

Nazis were moron corp thugs. The nastiest shit around.

Hate and fear, divide & rule, scapegoating & violence.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed You are mentally inferior. You do realise that junkers were taken over by the Nazis? and besides, these were german, why would the nazis oppose them?

The BNP aren't nazis mentally inferior bastard, where the hell did you get that crap from? You fool.

Nazis smashed communists, they actually gave jobs to the unemployed workers, they fixed the German economy.

Most biologists joined and/or supported the nazi party, infact, artists and scientists in general really liked the Nazis.

[marsCubed]

@cidseven LoL like Einstein was liked by the Nazis.

BNP are a Nazi party, I gave you a link where this is confirmed by their own leaded talking to the KKK.

BNP even have a wing named after Adolph Hitler.

I end my communication with you now, you are obviously a poorly educated person who thinks that all the problems of you life can be solved by scapegoating other poor people.

divide and rule.. I hope you realize this now.

1% own 43% of financial wealth in USA now, 80% own 7%

think about it.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed That nazis didn't really need einstein, but that is a totally different issue all together. The BNP aren't nazis and the KKK aren't nazis either, infact the KKK don't like the nazis. Wheren in your video did it prove that the BNP were nazis? All Nick Griffin was saying was that they use buzzwords, which is what all politicans use.

Who am I scapegoating? Who am I blaming???

You don't know what you are on about.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed You talk of hate and fear, divide and rule, thuggery and violence?

The communists took over russia violently, something opposed by the majority of people. The Nazis were elected. The soviet union banned genetic research, the nazis pioneered various sciences and implemented eugenics policies.

Nothing is more scape goat than blaming the rich and encouraging class war. Go and fuck yourself you stupid commie idiot.

[marsCubed]

@cidseven Lenin realized the revolution was doomed unless other industrialized countries supported her.

In the 1920s 21 Armies from 11 countries invaded, including USA, UK, India and Japan,

The white generals were extremely unpopular and used slave armies funded by the west.

90% mutinied.

It killed the revolution, led to mass starvation and millions dead, and allowed Stalin to use his power base of 'red capitalists' to get into power.

China too was state capitalism, with red flags.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed didn't you say you were going to stop talking to me? LOL.

Lenin was an unintelligent loser, and his 'revolution' was opposed by working class russian people, he had to violently suppress them in the civil war that followed for fucks sake.

Hitler on the other hand was democratically elected and had his very own volenteer army for fucks sake. The nazis brought prosperity, dignity and power back to Germany, communism brought misery to all.

[marsCubed]

@cidseven Until recently BNP were vandalizing Jewish cemeteries and beating up Jewish people, They even used to work with Muslims to exterminate jews.

They have a wing named after Adolph Hitler, and you say they aren't Nazis?

Next you will be saying KKK are not racist.

You are a moron.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed Wtf are you talking about, there are jewish members of the BNP, it even has a Jewish councillor. They are easily more opposed to Islam than the Jews.

Don't get me wrong, there are many annoying jews, but muslims are outrageously stupid and outrageously more annoying..

'racist' is a marxist concept.

[marsCubed]

@cidseven Racism comes from Bigoted nationalist movements.

There is only the human race.

Nazis like the BNP are about divide and rule. BNP's constitution banned all except whites from joining. They recruit from football hooligans. many of their leaders have criminal records for race hate attacks.

They are holocaust denying thugs. Nick Griffin was encouraging Sharia law until recently as a way to target Jews. then changed tactics to target Muslims as that got the BNP more political capital.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed Racism = a marxist view of nationalism and biology. Marxists tried to ban genetics afterall because it challenged their unscientific belief of economic determinism. In short, being born rich/poor won't necessarily make you a),b) or c), genetics has more to do with that.

There is a human species, and the distinct groups within that species are called races, this is a well recognized and accepted truth.

[societyvision]

@cidseven > Having such a simplistic view of the world shows how much of a 'child prodigy' you really were. Contrary to your contradictory argument, advances in genetics has debunked the myth about the existence of ' distinct groups' or 'races'. I suggest you learn more about genetics before you use in an argument.

[cidseven]

@societyvision Geniuses are well known for being able to simplify things. Where others see absolute complexity and chaos, the genius often sees the straight forward dynamic.

What 'advances in genetics' are you referring to? Please tell me you are not referring to lewtonins disproven arguments?

You are obviously very ignorant.

"Racial Groupings Match Genetic Profiles, Stanford Study Finds"

races = distinct genetic clusters produced by evolutionary isolation.

[societyvision]

@cidseven > Lynn B Jorde & Stephen P Wooding - Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine - Human populations are seldom demarcated by precise genetic boundaries. Substantial overlap occur between populations, invalidating the concept that populations (or races) are discrete types.

[cidseven]

@societyvision That is some selective reading you have there.

You conveniently left out "Because traditional concepts of race are in turn correlated with geography, it is inaccurate to state that race is "biologically meaningless."

Overall the conclusion is post modern nonsense. Genetic and furthermore anatomical differences do exist between the races, that is a confirmed scientific fact, any opposition to this fact can only be semantical and/or post modern(stupid).

[societyvision]

@cidseven > I'm afraid you are almost entirely wrong my friend however, I am NOT saying that bio-diversity does not exist. Of course it does, however, 'racial' categories are NOT bounded and distinct in the slightest. Whatever readings we both bring to the table can be argued for or against depending on a political standpoint. As a paleo-anthropologist at the University of London I should know a thing or two about bio-diversity. Your arguments seem to have an almost political flavor to them.

[cidseven]

@societyvision No, on the contrary, it is YOU who is entirely wrong, and, ironically, your own source disproved your initial claims.

As a paleo-anthropologist it SHOULD be common knowledge to you that there are indeed physically distinct groups of humans who are indeed a product of evolutionary isolation, thus genetic.

Your arguments are motivated by post modernist deconstructionism/anti-science­, and likely marxism. My arguments are based on science.

[societyvision]

@cidseven > My dear friend, I indeed am a scientist. You on the other hand, are a politician. These are two distinct camps. I live in the real world of biological evidence, and you do not. If you re-read my sources again (paying particular attention to their conclusions), you will see that I am indeed correct. As I have already stated, I am not suggesting that bio-diversity doesn't exist, It simply doesn't exist on your politically motivated level.

[cidseven]

@societyvision You are not a scientist. You are a post modernist., and a liar, I caught you red handed selectively quoting your own study, which, actually admitted that my stance was correct.

The racial groups, are not invalid, as such things have medical, physical and psychological significance. The races are genetically and anatomically distinguishale to the point that geneticists and anthropologists, can identify these groups.

Your opposition to this truth is purely marxist.

[societyvision]

@cidseven > My dearest racist friend, much to your disillusionment and dissatisfaction, I'm afraid I win again. I am indeed a scientist with years of travel, research and academic study under my belt. I have certificates and have published work. Furthermore, you assumed that I was a 'Marxist', when in fact, I am not. There is however, a difference between a racist and a scientist, and you, my dear friend, are the former, whilst I am the latter. You might also want to re-read our discussion.

[cidseven]

@societyvision Society, you have lost the argument. Racist is a marxist word, why are you using it? are you a marxist?

Your own source disproved your argument. In order for you to say that race is a meaningless concept you need to prove that race is not genetic, that there are no differences between the races, you need to prove that evolution didn't happen.

Geneticists and anthropologists can tell races apart through a variety of methods, races are a product of evolutionary isolation.

[societyvision]

@cidseven > The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Human Genome Program DNA studies - Studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another.

[cidseven]

@societyvision 'seperate' is a convenient choice of words.

Studies show that racial groups, easily discernable based on appearance are genetically distinct, as the stanford study made clear.

More specifically, police forensics teams can discern the racial ancestry of an individual by examining their DNA, infact, this is a common and well known proceedure.

Your argument, has no credibility outside of post modernist circles. Racial groups ARE phyiscally/genetically/anatomi­cally distinct.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed How are the bnp divide and rule? and how were the nazis divide and rule? the Nazis were pan germanists which saw the inclusion of german expats or german monorities into other countries into their reich. They were if anything all for german unification, not divide and rule.

The bnp are pro british union, so... no divide and rule either.

The Labour party and the tories hire the criminal thugs the UAF to attack their politica opponents, strong armed tactics are not a bnp monopoly.

[lethalsub]

@cidseven Is 'misanthropist' a marxist concept?

[the12gauge]

@cidseven Lenin was a prodigy, 1st student in his class, a librarian and he liked to read, you on the other hand need to read some history because people might actually read the bullshit you 're typing

[cidseven]

@the12gauge Lenin was a dumb guy with dumb opinions. Reading alot does not make someone clever.

What is ironic is, I actually was a child prodigy. I have studied history intensely. I know more about history and human psychology than karl marx and lenin did, and this is why I can easily point out the major flaws in their stupid arguments.

[cidseven]

@marsCubed I want you to answer these questions:

1) are you anti capitalist?

2) do you want to abolish nation states?

3) do you agree with marxes economic, historic and social analysis?

[dubified89]

Can you just get out of here you fucking Nazi? No one watching this video is gonna want to hear what you have to say. In fact I wish you didn't exist at all

[cidseven]

@dubified89 Why don't you fuck off you communist heap of shit.

Marx was an idiot with no education. Class isn't more important than things such as mentality, religion, nationality etc. The napoleonic wars proved that. WW1 proved it, ww2 proved it.

Communism and marxism is nothing more than a quasi religious cult for stupid people and rejects.

[hithlum]

He says the guy was a Marxist and a pacifist.... that's a contradiction.

[AdamskiAirsoft]

@hithlum: You are ignorant.

[MononofuBlood]

I don't get what Andrej is trying to say when he says that he used to describe himself as "50% anarchist and 50% I.W.W."; is he trying to affirm that he's an anarcho-syndicalist? If so, why even go trough the trouble of phrasing it like that... Or is he an anarcho-communist and is making sure nobody mistakes him for a part of the insurrectionary wing of anarchist-communism?

[greenghost2008]

pacifist and a marxist? what a contradiction in terms.

[theirresistableE]

what an epitome of political uselessness

[canaan1967]

Wow that's a long introduction. I'll have to come back later

[D0g63rt]

Click anywhere on the red line and off you go.

[thesecondshelf]

GO COLLECTIVE ANARCHISM!!

[AndyFleming]

Yes: thanks heaps for uploading this and the other vids from the Forum -- you're a gem David!

[kurtilein3]

oh, the statements about obama in the introduction....

i guess after 100 days of obama in office, its safe to say that this was an embarassing moment for the host.

[yadsik]

Thanks Buddhagem.