Democrats should consider voting in the republican primaries for Ron Paul, based upon the national discussion it could create for the notion of international Peace and corporatism.
Even if they don't vote for him in the general election.
Do you Really want Newt or Romney to run any risk of being president? Really?
A nomination for Ron Paul to be GOP nominee at least keeps the possiblity of a warmonger out of the equation.
@budgeX2 "Reasonable suspicion". If the evidence is right there, then the officer has reasonable suspicion as defined by the Supreme Court so he/she can search.
@CircusofPython What evidence is there that a body is in the back you your car that can lead to a police officer to have 'reasonable suspicion' to search it? And if there is such evidence, why can we not replace the word 'body' with 'drugs'?
@budgeX2 Don't ask me lol the court will decide what constitutes "reasonable suspicion" if you were to sue for an illegal search, and Im sure the court would say that a body and/or drugs constitute reasonable suspicion.
@CircusofPython Apologies for jumping down your throat XD. Here, in the UK, just the whiff of cannabis can be the 'reasonable suspicion' for the officer to examine a car. But, to be honest, I don't think the officer needs a reason. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about.
wake up. key words here: IF THE JUDGE AGREES just because you know your rights according to the law don't think it will save you from cops, lawyers and judges taking each others words over those of a tax paying citizen.
record what lol anyway USA and Canada is bit different and here you can get easy ticket recording is not admissible evidence unless otherwise the party recorded is made aware of it so it all lol but if a 3rd does recording that would work .
we are anonymous, we are aware of the corruption in the world's governments and their apathy for the human lives because of money.
we are aware of the governments' attempt to cover on the news of the rebellions to keep us as slaves for the current system.
we are anonymous, we declare war on the corrupted system, join the plan to get your freedom and rights back. you are a human being, your life has value. we are legion, expect us!
@MrJudas666666 They can't use any evidence if you do not consent because they do not have a warrant to search. The warrant is issued by a judge and they must state what/where they will search and what they are looking for. If you show "probable Cause" then they can legally search you. If you have drugs in the backseat and you refuse and they find it it can't be used in court. If you're high or have the drugs in plain sight, it's probable cause and they can search you regardless.
This is a thin line, very thin. If a known drugseller is refusing to consent to a search of his car, and the police find large amounts of drugs hidden, the situation is pretty clear and the judge should look past any laws protecting the dealer and give him max prison for his crime.
If a otherwise law abiding citizen is caught with a few grams of weed in his car from an search he did not consent to, the judge should rule in his favor and dismiss any proof.
@Dreez76 just because a person is a known drug dealer does not mean that their rights are null and void to consent to search. equal protection under the law for everybody.dealing drugs is not truly a crime because nobody's property or person is being hurt.
This is true.... this summer i got bopped for grabbing some percs at a hott location... the cop pulled me out reached into my pockets grabbed my shit, then put me in cuffs...
My lawyer filed a motion to surpress.... All thrown out !
Just be careful out there my friends.... the government has some of the meanest, ugliest, nastiest dogs in the yard, and they're all trained... very well !
I was convicted of a DWI while not driving. My keys were not in the ignition. They were in my pocket; and I was standing outside my car. However, I had been driving my car and I was in close proximity to my car and had a strong odor of alcohol on my breath. I consented to a field sobriety test. In retrospect, I should have walked away and had a taxi pick me up. It would have saved me $2000 in court costs and legal fees that set my life back . Don't drink and drive!!!
@sbranson01 I would appeal this, he had not proof that you were driving other than your own admission to have been driving. why did you consent to a sobriety test that you were not necessary to do if you were not driving? standing outside of you car would only be conspiracy to dui not an actual dui. APPEAL THIS WITH ALL YOUR MIGHT ESPECIALLY IF YOU DRIVE FOR A LIVING. DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE COST .
@sbranson01 tell me about it I've been there before. my attorney folded like a lawn chair at the last moment. I thought he was enough of an expert on the intoxlizer 5000 , and he never mentioned extra money to bring in experts to dispute the false numbers given fasly & illegally by the state, not to mention I was refused the opportunity for a real blood test and falsly imprisoned with no phone call. I was 300 feet from my home, nobody was hurt nor their property , hence no real crime.
@circusboy90210 I consented to the sobriety test because I was afraid and I didn't know any better. I really thought the officer might call for backup if I refused, and you know how things go down when they call for backup.
Yes. Rule number one when dealing with cops: DON'T LET THEM INTIMIDATE YOU. Their operation is dependent on intimidation and the ignorance of the public. If everyone was informed and strong enough not to be intimidated these cops would never get away with most of the shit they get away with.
It really exists just because of the really dumb drug laws, people enjoy marijuana, and most people who do enjoy it do not pose any kind of personal or public threat.
However, the law deems it illegal, and Police are obligated to uphold that.
Since it's a retarded law, people are looking for ways around it until government officials get their heads out of their asses and stop accepting bribes from Cigarette lobbyists to keep Marijuana illegal.
@animekid200 Cannabis is only illegal because the government makes less money off of it than if it were legal. If they legalised it and sold it at your local Walmart etc people would think hold on a second, why don't I just grow my own free of charge? Hence they make more money from it being illegal.
When you compare cannabis to alcohol it's amazing that alcohol is even legal.
In the UK you can join the army (become a trained killer) when you're 16 but buy cigarettes and alcohol when you're 18.
i swear this sum shit to get money....cus i been thru all this shit before, the LAW wins all the time, being an American means you have no RIGHTS, bullshit ass videos
@learningmusic247 on a certain level i agree, the cops dont follow what they should but thats becuz they get away with it cuz citizens are retarded. im 17 years old, and im driving home on my bike with my backpack and i got a gun in my backpack that my brother asked me to bring him from his locker on base. now i get pulled over and the officer asks to search and i declined and he looked thru my bag, found the gun, and detained me. that officer is now on probation? the law won? i think i won.
@MrBeastluver thats cool, good for you. Police primary function is to collect revenue for the state by putting people in the hands of the court system
@clayperro he got it on base several months ago and has a permit for it and everything, all i had to do was unlock the locker and putt it in my backpack, and as military doesnt question people leaving the base, it was easy to get off the base. and if stopped on base it would have been simple, it was the jacksonville police department that decided to make it difficult
@MrBeastluver Awesome that officer deserved to be on probation. Police hav to remember PROTECT AND SERVE not DISRESPECT AND DO WHATEVER THE HELL I WANT.
@o0dl they didnt let me do anything. the gun was in my brothers locker at the gym. all i did was go in and unlock his locker and putt it in my backpack and leave. they dont guard the lockerrooms dipshit. it was a simple thing and my brother would have got it himself but his car was outa gas so he asked me to take my motorcycle.
sir i do agree,BUT what did you do after that? did you persuave to make sure your rights where not violeted? i guess not or maybe you did. if you did im glad, because the more people wake up and demand their rights to be respected the lesslikely their rights will be ignored.
@learningmusic247 Judging by your crappy grammar and poor spelling I'll assume your a black Negro. In which case any officer of the law has the right and should make it his duty to search you.
@bnz500 A black negro? So there are non-black negros?
Also, I wouldn't be talking about grammar if I were you. You used "your" instead of "you're" and your second sentence is a sentence fragment, since you began it with a prepositional phrase. It should read "black Negro, in which case..." instead of separating it with a period.
@NutritiouslyHigh I never said I had good grammar. All I said was that I could tell he was a black Negro (as opposed to an albino Negro) because of his grammar. You = Grammar Nazi = Raging fagot.
By your logic and your own admission of not having good grammar skills, are we all safe to assume that YOU'RE a "black negro"?
You see, this is the problem with your comment. You set a criterion, i.e. having poor grammar, as a bogus basis for making baseless and utterly idiotic assumptions about a person's ethnicity all while NOT living up to your own criterion.
You don't have to be a grammar Nazi to come off as an ignoramus and hypocrite.
@Titus420ful Im a nigger. And they should search people like me because it makes weaklings like you safer. Thats all im saying. Do you understand now you dumb shit wanna-be intellectual poser?
Haha, cute. You apparently suck at getting your idiotic point across, because you still make no sense at all.
I couldn't possibly say anything to expose your stupidity more than you already have. Congratulations, you are truly a dumb fuck. Your mother must be really proud of you, haha....
Now. Quit trying to sound like a grown-up and go back to your reality television, asshat.
Haha, what a pretty comment. I must say I am impressed that you actually had the cognitive skills to complete such an organized comment. I wouldn't have expected you to be able to pull off such simple pattern recognition, ya know--given that you have the cranial capacity of a grape.
I think you have proven yourself worthy of advancing to the 3rd grade.
"You used "your" instead of "you're" and your second sentence is a sentence fragment, since you began it with a prepositional phrase."
You should not have put a comma after the word "fragment." That is called a comma splice.
Ya know,..since we're on the subject of grammar.
If you were a writer, you would understand, too, that it is a tacky practice to begin a sentence with the word '"also", though it is not grammatically incorrect.
If you can't tell that I was being buoyantly ironic on purpose there's probably not a whole lot I can do for you.
It is quite clear (at least it should be) that I wittingly used the informal or improper "ya know" in my sentence while your mistakes were genuine. The fact that your genuine mistakes were made while correcting another's mistakes makes them unwittingly ironic. There's a difference.
But don't get me wrong, I didn't think you corrected that other dude in a hypocritical way, he was definitely a douche. I didn't call you a hypocrite or anything. You were spot on in your corrections of that douchebag's comments and he needed to be called out by somebody. I just noticed the comma splice and figured I'd keep the grammar rodeo alive. Also, (haha I did that on purpose) I did point out that beginning a sentence with "also" isn't incorrect, it just isn't preferred.
@Titus420ful Haha, well touché. I guess there's nothing left to say here...
...except that you put a comma where should have put a semicolon in "[...] in a hypocritical way, he was [...]". What is that called when you separate two independent clauses with a comma? I believe it is called a COMMA SPLICE.
Haha, no worries I won't hold it against YA. I knew what YA meant (ok I'll stop). And yes, I did realize the semicolon thing as I was typing it. I thought about it for a fleeting moment, but I get lazy, and honestly it's pretty rare that anyone knows how to use a semicolon so don't be offended when I say I didn't expect you to catch it, but most people don't know what a preposition is either so all I can say is nicely played, sir. Way to keep the rodeo a-goin'...
@Titus420ful Correct the placement of your quotation marks in the first sentence of this comment. Also, the word "since" should be replaced with "because".
Question marks are to be inside the quotation mark if the question is part of the quotation, and outside if the question is not part of the quotation.
When I wrote that sentence I was thinking that the quoted phrase, "black negro," wasn't part of the question I was asking. If that were true my punctuation would be correct, but upon delayed review of the comment I realized the question would be incomplete otherwise.You're correct. I didn't review the comment before I posted it.
If I have enough money I have the "right" to break the law and get away with it, but if I'm poor and don't have any money I don't even get my basic rights.
@learningmusic247 people only have their rights abused because people like you believe you hold no power. the constitution still hasn't been burned. maybe you should try to read it once in a while
@learningmusic247 people only have their rights abused because people like you believe you hold no power. the constitution still hasn't been burned. maybe you should try to read it once in a while
And what about the original arrest record? Just because the charges may have been dropped doesn't mean that the record of arrest disappears. You forgot to mention that. You forgot to mention that the arrest record has to be expunged also.
@TheReturningShadow I think that varies state by state... Some states you just have to show the chief law enforcement agency that you were not convicted, and they will take it out of the public records search.
The interesting thing is that in the US, as soon as you are arrested all that information is usually available on a website. But in England, you actually have to be found guilty before that information becomes public record.
i am enraged because this happened to me and i got pulled over for not having a light bulb for my back license plate and the cop opened my door because he apparently smelled weed and took us out onto the curb and searched the whole car just to find my friend had 2 grams of weed and a grinder is it illegal for that to happen since i said i had no consent for searches
@dendrok1 That was legal he had probable cause, he used the no ligh tbulb to pull you and he smelled the weed. Therefore he can legally search the car.
I got pulled over when I was high as a fucking kite, getting head from a rock ho and blasting NWA's 'Fuck tha Police' at full volume. I forget how it ended but your mother's a whore.
I learned this on Law & Order too! Cause this dude had crack/drugs or whatever but they searched his stuff without a warrant and what not, so they couldn't even use the evidence they found. HAHA
this series of videos is really interesting, I live in australia here, but it makes me think that it's just a tutorial on how to get away with drug trafficing, and doing other illegal shit. this one is a prime example. it's teaching criminals how to not get in trouble! that's exactly the BAD side of having lawyers! because the criminal always has someone defending him! and this law, too
@super6plx Regardless of whether your drug trafficking or not, it your right against unlawful searches and seizures. Whether you have 10 pounds of dope in your car or your just refusing the search for the reason its you car (and your right) it should all be the same. Your property, your right. And besides, the cops still get the drugs, you just cant get in trouble for it.
@SkateOrDie7749 You're an idiot, Canada and the USA are different countries and they have different laws and regulations. Shows what complete ignoramus you truly are. So do me a favor, fuck off yeah?
@ruskie20 I know they are different countries, Alot of there laws are the same. You wouldn't know that because your a goofy ass Russian. You take stupidity to a whole nother level.
@SkateOrDie7749 I'm from the UK, I serve in the RAMC and was stationed in Russia you fucking twat. A bit obvious that you're an idiot, if the country is different, the laws are different. It doesn't matter if some are the same, the legal precautions always change. Just like you said, you take stupidity to a whole other level.
and all the pig has to say is that he smelled the pot and the whole search becomes legal under probable cause. The fourth amendment is meaningless people wake up!
First off, most police officers will not search you with no warrant, so refusing a search is very moronic. If you feel that you are now invincible and can now drive around with paraphernalia in your vehicle be our guest. This video isn't a great resemblance to reality.
I'm a fellow pothead to but as americans we always think about our RIGHTS instead of our RESPONSIBILITIES to this country. such as voting, serving jury duty and stuff like that. in other words helping this country run via volunteer work. i think if we excersized our responsibilities then we deserve to be granted rights instead of abusing them for selfish reasons.
Cops only see their side and see themselves as righteous coz they wear blue, don't they realise they need another world to watch over this one? And likely, a bigger one?? SIMPLE MATH geeeez. They make me rant even when I don't like doing so!
there is only Criminal Justice, not, Civilian or Moral, or Just Justice.
It is all a fools only play game. So if they are illegally searching us, why don't THEY pay up the damaged of our lawyer??
Oh, unless I can say I don't have the money to a lawyer, nor I want to spend if I have it... oh wait if I have it I must spend it, even though it's the cops fault.
@7ito1990 Well, there will be a lawsuit filed (most likely from the party searched) against the police officer. You will more than likely receive money for winning this case. Is that not justice enough? You pay for a lawyer, you win the suit, you are able to pay your lawyer and might even have some extra left :) That's the justice.
Well, seeing so that he receives justice, it's just :)
Otherwise there is a strong possibility it's unjust.
But if it's common for that to happen, in terms of justice (again), then I humble down my reasoning and listen to yours as more valid :) or just valid :))
Thanks bro! Nice info :)) Hey check out Nassim Haramein, David Wilcock, Pete Peterson, Bashar, Project camelot. THey're awesome, this is my thanks to you :)
my problem with this is, it's all your word against the police officers' as to whether you said you don't consent to searches or not, and that's the judge's call and they will always side with the officer because 80% of the time the police officer will be telling the truth
@iliketha That's why I put my phone in my armpit (weird i know), but I use the voice recorder function everytime I get stopped. I also ask the officer to state his name before I do anything, and if he asks why, i say "just to verify who you are in case i can't read your handwriting on the ticket/warning"
This is what I hate. The law being "bent" because of legality bullshit. You don't' consent to a search and the cop searches you anyways, find a bag of cocaine on you that's obviously going to be distributed because your a fucking dumbs drug dealer, and you get off scott free because you said, "I don't consent to searches"? That's retarded. You still broke the fucking law and got caught! If anything the cop should be charged for breaking the law AND the drug dealer charged! bullshit!
@crazybadcuber yeah think of it another way, you sleep with a girl, turns out to be a cop's wife, he pulls you over, you say you don't consent, he plants drugs in your car, you'll be glad of the law against illegal searches then
So like, what do you do if you say you dont consent & then they sill search you & you had like a body in the car or some shit? Wouldn't you be fucked regardless? I dont think that rule will aply here.
@xXdarkredknight consider this your economy depends on illegal money from drugs to keep it propped up
research this
its true
also the government is involved in trafficing and has been decades read the book where the underground meets government and watch the doco the war on drugs
Ok, so if i say to a cop that pulled me over " i dont consent to searches" and he asks me to get out of the vehicle. What should i do? And seaches my body.
So pretty much don't allow your car to smell of weed and be sure you are not driving recklessly when you have some on you. That gives officers probable cause and the legal right to search your vehicle. If on the other hand you have been pulled over for something completely unrelated to suspicious behavior, any drugs the cop finds in your car during an unlawful search cannot be held against you because the Constitution holds reign. But wait, too bad cops and perjury go hand in hand.
If you step out and are searched, be sure to say before hand (loudly) you do not consent to any searches, it is recorded on the cruiser's video camera and usable as evidence for the motion if the cop takes it that far. Do not say anything else at all.
Your experiences do not constitute as the legal or illegal procedure of upholding our law. The only things that constitute as PC is consent or exigent circumstances. For those that are too ignorant to understand that I will explain what that means. If you do not consent and have no contraband or weapons visible while in your car, he has no justification to ask you to step out at all, if you do it is at your own will, which arguably constitutes as complying to a search in a cops eyes.....
Unfortunately, its been my experience that if you are a teenager caught with some pot, you're pretty well fucked. Doesn't matter how the cop found it, what the law says, whether its probable cause or not. A teenager's word against a cop's is a losing battle.
A teenager if smart enough has the police cruiser's camera on his side, think about that. The only way you will be legally caught with pot is if you are smoking it in front of him or it is visible from outside the vehicle, a smell DOES give PC to the officer, so crack your window, give license and registration and then close your window. You're not required to do anything past that point until the officer unlawfully detains you or lets you go.
@thatdudeonyourscreen To bad the government just passed a bill called S. 1867 National Defense authorization Act Enabling martial Law in the United States. Now they can arrest you indefinitely without trial. The S.1867 bill is treason
I don't know bout this. I was arrested for having an oz. of marijuana leaf in my car earlier this year. But I wasn't in my car. I was standing outside of it. And the officer wanted to search my car. I said "no I don't consent to a search" and he bullied me into doing it. My case was not thrown out. I have now have a class B felony
@Voileen Isnt it obvious? frame the cop for possession lol, but i take everything too serious and hate cops, alternatively fuck with his car when hes off duty.
@DemoticVEVO That's why police are required to use cameras with audio capability. If they don't have the tapes then the courts are actually forced to take your word on it and the police officer who destroyed the tapes or never had it running will be reprimanded or suspended.
you should also say the part where if you say no, the police can tow your car if they have reasonable suspicion....
isreal194 4 hours ago
key word IF the judge agrees. *****IF*****
airmatt86 1 day ago
Would a pending concealed weapon charge be probable cause, to search my vehicle
taborsspot 2 days ago
I love driving around with drugs
123lowp 3 days ago
IF the judge agrees..
MrDlobMusic 3 days ago
Awesome, but if that works ... will I get my weed back?
Neonman78 4 days ago
@Neonman78 lol
greenchef6 3 days ago
LMFAO I DIED <3 funniest thing i read ever
123LilSerb123 5 days ago
if the judge agrees ----come on.
Krewcible 1 week ago
But what about my baggy you just threw away? Will the police reimburse me my sack of 90?
tehcheat0 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Search "Blue Republican"
Democrats should consider voting in the republican primaries for Ron Paul, based upon the national discussion it could create for the notion of international Peace and corporatism.
Even if they don't vote for him in the general election.
Do you Really want Newt or Romney to run any risk of being president? Really?
A nomination for Ron Paul to be GOP nominee at least keeps the possiblity of a warmonger out of the equation.
Plus it irks the neocons.
Premier112 1 week ago
Does this work if I have a body in the back of my car?
budgeX2 1 week ago 33
@budgeX2
I would imagine so, yes.
WeirdAlYankoviced 1 week ago
@budgeX2 Or a bomb?
JaiNobesIsARat 1 week ago
@budgeX2 Your free to go just like Casey Anthony! Whoa hoo!
Celebrity729 3 days ago
@budgeX2 "Reasonable suspicion". If the evidence is right there, then the officer has reasonable suspicion as defined by the Supreme Court so he/she can search.
CircusofPython 2 days ago
@CircusofPython What evidence is there that a body is in the back you your car that can lead to a police officer to have 'reasonable suspicion' to search it? And if there is such evidence, why can we not replace the word 'body' with 'drugs'?
budgeX2 2 days ago
@budgeX2 Don't ask me lol the court will decide what constitutes "reasonable suspicion" if you were to sue for an illegal search, and Im sure the court would say that a body and/or drugs constitute reasonable suspicion.
CircusofPython 2 days ago
@CircusofPython Apologies for jumping down your throat XD. Here, in the UK, just the whiff of cannabis can be the 'reasonable suspicion' for the officer to examine a car. But, to be honest, I don't think the officer needs a reason. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about.
budgeX2 2 days ago
@budgeX2 haha no worries man just a misunderstanding. I was speaking from an American perspective so yeah
CircusofPython 2 days ago
HEY, who wants to buy weed hit me up (puf puff)
ku42 2 weeks ago
wake up. key words here: IF THE JUDGE AGREES just because you know your rights according to the law don't think it will save you from cops, lawyers and judges taking each others words over those of a tax paying citizen.
pockEclipse 2 weeks ago
you tube for drug dealers
mackattacksback 2 weeks ago
Why are you telling people how to get away with doing illegal things?
MsFreedom2fly 3 weeks ago
@MsFreedom2fly its not about that. Its about protecting our privacy, a police officer has no right to search you if you do not consent to it.
Most police officers get kind of intimidated when you KNOW YOUR RIGHTS.
balaalalaslk 3 weeks ago
@MsFreedom2fly Because criminals are people too. They have the right to live their life without being oppressed and have their liberty be taken away.
Just because I massacred a hundred people doesn't mean I'm a bad person does it.
Stop discrimination.
raydredX 2 weeks ago
record what lol anyway USA and Canada is bit different and here you can get easy ticket recording is not admissible evidence unless otherwise the party recorded is made aware of it so it all lol but if a 3rd does recording that would work .
MrWhySoSeriousKhan 3 weeks ago
Bull crap lol that law how would you prove it that you actually refused this joke
MrWhySoSeriousKhan 3 weeks ago
@MrWhySoSeriousKhan: Record everything. Let the officers own words bury him.
Pafoofnik1 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we are anonymous, we are aware of the corruption in the world's governments and their apathy for the human lives because of money.
we are aware of the governments' attempt to cover on the news of the rebellions to keep us as slaves for the current system.
we are anonymous, we declare war on the corrupted system, join the plan to get your freedom and rights back. you are a human being, your life has value. we are legion, expect us!
watch the documentary at
thezeitgeistmovement. com
daryps03 3 weeks ago
so what if they find evidence that you commited a murder?
MrJudas666666 3 weeks ago
@MrJudas666666 They can't use any evidence if you do not consent because they do not have a warrant to search. The warrant is issued by a judge and they must state what/where they will search and what they are looking for. If you show "probable Cause" then they can legally search you. If you have drugs in the backseat and you refuse and they find it it can't be used in court. If you're high or have the drugs in plain sight, it's probable cause and they can search you regardless.
Christianmarquez 3 weeks ago
There's only one problem... The police law of "Probable Cause" win every time. All they have to say is that you were acting suspicious.
jewelavenueahx 3 weeks ago
@jewelavenueahx That's true...
Christianmarquez 3 weeks ago
First, we have to clean the Judicial branch, then the law will have an effect.
TheDukeofMania 3 weeks ago
HAHAHAHA wow this video is one of the funniest I have ever seen. This was a joke, right?
VoidmasterNX 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
vote ron paul for president in 2012 and weed will be legal
spread this to 5 videos if you believe in legalization!
Koopaaah 3 weeks ago
Drug dealers are the real job creators.
Thanks Fox :D
ThatBlackPanda 3 weeks ago 43
This is a thin line, very thin. If a known drugseller is refusing to consent to a search of his car, and the police find large amounts of drugs hidden, the situation is pretty clear and the judge should look past any laws protecting the dealer and give him max prison for his crime.
If a otherwise law abiding citizen is caught with a few grams of weed in his car from an search he did not consent to, the judge should rule in his favor and dismiss any proof.
Dreez76 3 weeks ago
@Dreez76 just because a person is a known drug dealer does not mean that their rights are null and void to consent to search. equal protection under the law for everybody.dealing drugs is not truly a crime because nobody's property or person is being hurt.
circusboy90210 3 weeks ago
in order for this to work, you have to have a ratio of people in the car, greater then how many officers there are. Otherwise, it just wont work
hopefulbeef 3 weeks ago
This is true.... this summer i got bopped for grabbing some percs at a hott location... the cop pulled me out reached into my pockets grabbed my shit, then put me in cuffs...
My lawyer filed a motion to surpress.... All thrown out !
Just be careful out there my friends.... the government has some of the meanest, ugliest, nastiest dogs in the yard, and they're all trained... very well !
therealplease 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
sbranson01 4 weeks ago
I was convicted of a DWI while not driving. My keys were not in the ignition. They were in my pocket; and I was standing outside my car. However, I had been driving my car and I was in close proximity to my car and had a strong odor of alcohol on my breath. I consented to a field sobriety test. In retrospect, I should have walked away and had a taxi pick me up. It would have saved me $2000 in court costs and legal fees that set my life back . Don't drink and drive!!!
sbranson01 4 weeks ago
@sbranson01 I would appeal this, he had not proof that you were driving other than your own admission to have been driving. why did you consent to a sobriety test that you were not necessary to do if you were not driving? standing outside of you car would only be conspiracy to dui not an actual dui. APPEAL THIS WITH ALL YOUR MIGHT ESPECIALLY IF YOU DRIVE FOR A LIVING. DON'T WORRY ABOUT THE COST .
circusboy90210 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
sbranson01 3 weeks ago
@circusboy90210 It is very hard to fight a DWI in NC.
sbranson01 3 weeks ago
@sbranson01 tell me about it I've been there before. my attorney folded like a lawn chair at the last moment. I thought he was enough of an expert on the intoxlizer 5000 , and he never mentioned extra money to bring in experts to dispute the false numbers given fasly & illegally by the state, not to mention I was refused the opportunity for a real blood test and falsly imprisoned with no phone call. I was 300 feet from my home, nobody was hurt nor their property , hence no real crime.
circusboy90210 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
sbranson01 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@circusboy90210 I consented to the sobriety test because I was afraid and I didn't know any better. I really thought the officer might call for backup if I refused, and you know how things go down when they call for backup.
sbranson01 3 weeks ago
@sbranson01
Yes. Rule number one when dealing with cops: DON'T LET THEM INTIMIDATE YOU. Their operation is dependent on intimidation and the ignorance of the public. If everyone was informed and strong enough not to be intimidated these cops would never get away with most of the shit they get away with.
Titus420ful 3 weeks ago
@sbranson01
If it only cost you $2000 you're lucky.
You said you were driving before that. Did the officer see you driving your car? Is there any way the officer could have seen you driving?
If not, you got hosed. You should never have consented to the sobriety tests. I would have said "I wasn't driving" and stuck to it.
Titus420ful 3 weeks ago
Seriously, if your country needs these public information films to protect you from your own police then WTF. Do you live a Police State?
MrThreeLions 4 weeks ago 39
@MrThreeLions with the NDAA and SOPA bills going into reform yes we will be in the near future
multiglitching 2 weeks ago
@MrThreeLions These aren't from the government
LockedGT 2 weeks ago
@MrThreeLions Yes, yes we do.
CONFLlCT 2 weeks ago
@MrThreeLions Umm, yeah pretty much man. Welcome to america.
One1GreatCity 1 week ago
@MrThreeLions Pretty much, yes.
MasterPoIsoN1 1 week ago
It really exists just because of the really dumb drug laws, people enjoy marijuana, and most people who do enjoy it do not pose any kind of personal or public threat.
However, the law deems it illegal, and Police are obligated to uphold that.
Since it's a retarded law, people are looking for ways around it until government officials get their heads out of their asses and stop accepting bribes from Cigarette lobbyists to keep Marijuana illegal.
animekid200 1 week ago
@animekid200 Cannabis is only illegal because the government makes less money off of it than if it were legal. If they legalised it and sold it at your local Walmart etc people would think hold on a second, why don't I just grow my own free of charge? Hence they make more money from it being illegal.
When you compare cannabis to alcohol it's amazing that alcohol is even legal.
In the UK you can join the army (become a trained killer) when you're 16 but buy cigarettes and alcohol when you're 18.
SkitzLdN 1 week ago
@MrThreeLions pretty much
CreatureParallax 1 week ago
@MrThreeLions this is USA of course it is :D
Aldama209 1 week ago
after watching this video i watched ...and justice for all - Metallica. Thats the truth.
leearmour1 1 month ago
Only problem... THE JUDGE WON'T AGREE CUZ HE WANTS YOU IN JAIL.
GrayAu 1 month ago
BULLSHIT!
Thuggin2fullest 1 month ago
i swear this sum shit to get money....cus i been thru all this shit before, the LAW wins all the time, being an American means you have no RIGHTS, bullshit ass videos
learningmusic247 1 month ago 51
@learningmusic247 on a certain level i agree, the cops dont follow what they should but thats becuz they get away with it cuz citizens are retarded. im 17 years old, and im driving home on my bike with my backpack and i got a gun in my backpack that my brother asked me to bring him from his locker on base. now i get pulled over and the officer asks to search and i declined and he looked thru my bag, found the gun, and detained me. that officer is now on probation? the law won? i think i won.
MrBeastluver 1 month ago 47
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrBeastluver thats cool, good for you. Police primary function is to collect revenue for the state by putting people in the hands of the court system
learningmusic247 1 month ago
@MrBeastluver Where??
FlowStatePT 1 month ago
@FlowStatePT state of florida.
MrBeastluver 4 weeks ago
@MrBeastluver how did you get your bro's gun on base? Were you riding on a bike or driving a car? Confused.
clayperro 1 month ago
@clayperro driving a motorcycle.
crosby8987 1 month ago
@clayperro he got it on base several months ago and has a permit for it and everything, all i had to do was unlock the locker and putt it in my backpack, and as military doesnt question people leaving the base, it was easy to get off the base. and if stopped on base it would have been simple, it was the jacksonville police department that decided to make it difficult
MrBeastluver 4 weeks ago
@MrBeastluver Awesome that officer deserved to be on probation. Police hav to remember PROTECT AND SERVE not DISRESPECT AND DO WHATEVER THE HELL I WANT.
Zenphose 3 weeks ago
@MrBeastluver like someones gonna let a underage kid onto a base and take a gun that doesnt belong to them.... right.
o0dl 2 weeks ago
@o0dl they didnt let me do anything. the gun was in my brothers locker at the gym. all i did was go in and unlock his locker and putt it in my backpack and leave. they dont guard the lockerrooms dipshit. it was a simple thing and my brother would have got it himself but his car was outa gas so he asked me to take my motorcycle.
MrBeastluver 2 weeks ago
@learningmusic247
sir i do agree,BUT what did you do after that? did you persuave to make sure your rights where not violeted? i guess not or maybe you did. if you did im glad, because the more people wake up and demand their rights to be respected the lesslikely their rights will be ignored.
diablito118 1 month ago
@learningmusic247 Judging by your crappy grammar and poor spelling I'll assume your a black Negro. In which case any officer of the law has the right and should make it his duty to search you.
bnz500 1 month ago
@bnz500 you're*
syiunshi 4 weeks ago
@bnz500 A black negro? So there are non-black negros?
Also, I wouldn't be talking about grammar if I were you. You used "your" instead of "you're" and your second sentence is a sentence fragment, since you began it with a prepositional phrase. It should read "black Negro, in which case..." instead of separating it with a period.
NutritiouslyHigh 4 weeks ago
@NutritiouslyHigh I never said I had good grammar. All I said was that I could tell he was a black Negro (as opposed to an albino Negro) because of his grammar. You = Grammar Nazi = Raging fagot.
bnz500 4 weeks ago
@bnz500
By your logic and your own admission of not having good grammar skills, are we all safe to assume that YOU'RE a "black negro"?
You see, this is the problem with your comment. You set a criterion, i.e. having poor grammar, as a bogus basis for making baseless and utterly idiotic assumptions about a person's ethnicity all while NOT living up to your own criterion.
You don't have to be a grammar Nazi to come off as an ignoramus and hypocrite.
You are destined for small things, friend.
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@Titus420ful Im a nigger. And they should search people like me because it makes weaklings like you safer. Thats all im saying. Do you understand now you dumb shit wanna-be intellectual poser?
bnz500 4 weeks ago
@bnz500
Haha, cute. You apparently suck at getting your idiotic point across, because you still make no sense at all.
I couldn't possibly say anything to expose your stupidity more than you already have. Congratulations, you are truly a dumb fuck. Your mother must be really proud of you, haha....
Now. Quit trying to sound like a grown-up and go back to your reality television, asshat.
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@Titus420ful Clutching at straws much? HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH HAHAHAH PATHETIC.
bnz500 4 weeks ago
@bnz500
Haha, what a pretty comment. I must say I am impressed that you actually had the cognitive skills to complete such an organized comment. I wouldn't have expected you to be able to pull off such simple pattern recognition, ya know--given that you have the cranial capacity of a grape.
I think you have proven yourself worthy of advancing to the 3rd grade.
Ahem. Thanks for making my point, jackass.
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@bnz500
You should print that out and have your mommy stick it on the fridge.
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@NutritiouslyHigh
"You used "your" instead of "you're" and your second sentence is a sentence fragment, since you began it with a prepositional phrase."
You should not have put a comma after the word "fragment." That is called a comma splice.
Ya know,..since we're on the subject of grammar.
If you were a writer, you would understand, too, that it is a tacky practice to begin a sentence with the word '"also", though it is not grammatically incorrect.
Don't you just love YT grammar rodeos?!
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@Titus420ful Ha, so you point out that beginning a sentence with "also" is tacky in writing, yet you used "ya". That is slightly hypocritical, no?
NutritiouslyHigh 4 weeks ago
@NutritiouslyHigh
If you can't tell that I was being buoyantly ironic on purpose there's probably not a whole lot I can do for you.
It is quite clear (at least it should be) that I wittingly used the informal or improper "ya know" in my sentence while your mistakes were genuine. The fact that your genuine mistakes were made while correcting another's mistakes makes them unwittingly ironic. There's a difference.
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@NutritiouslyHigh
But don't get me wrong, I didn't think you corrected that other dude in a hypocritical way, he was definitely a douche. I didn't call you a hypocrite or anything. You were spot on in your corrections of that douchebag's comments and he needed to be called out by somebody. I just noticed the comma splice and figured I'd keep the grammar rodeo alive. Also, (haha I did that on purpose) I did point out that beginning a sentence with "also" isn't incorrect, it just isn't preferred.
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@Titus420ful Haha, well touché. I guess there's nothing left to say here...
...except that you put a comma where should have put a semicolon in "[...] in a hypocritical way, he was [...]". What is that called when you separate two independent clauses with a comma? I believe it is called a COMMA SPLICE.
HA!
NutritiouslyHigh 4 weeks ago
@Titus420ful Oh, damn it. I messed up my own correction by forgetting to type the word "you" in between "where" and "should."
NutritiouslyHigh 4 weeks ago
@NutritiouslyHigh
Haha, no worries I won't hold it against YA. I knew what YA meant (ok I'll stop). And yes, I did realize the semicolon thing as I was typing it. I thought about it for a fleeting moment, but I get lazy, and honestly it's pretty rare that anyone knows how to use a semicolon so don't be offended when I say I didn't expect you to catch it, but most people don't know what a preposition is either so all I can say is nicely played, sir. Way to keep the rodeo a-goin'...
Titus420ful 4 weeks ago
@Titus420ful Correct the placement of your quotation marks in the first sentence of this comment. Also, the word "since" should be replaced with "because".
sbranson01 3 weeks ago
@sbranson01
Question marks are to be inside the quotation mark if the question is part of the quotation, and outside if the question is not part of the quotation.
When I wrote that sentence I was thinking that the quoted phrase, "black negro," wasn't part of the question I was asking. If that were true my punctuation would be correct, but upon delayed review of the comment I realized the question would be incomplete otherwise.You're correct. I didn't review the comment before I posted it.
Titus420ful 3 weeks ago
@NutritiouslyHigh
It wasn't a comma splice; it was an unnecessary comma.
Titus420ful 3 weeks ago
@bnz500 MUPHRYS LAW STRIKES AGAIN!
JewsInUranus 1 week ago
@learningmusic247 you keep thinking that. evidence is suppressed every day. it does help to have an attourney to make it stick though.
circusboy90210 3 weeks ago
@learningmusic247 Actually you DO have rights, as long as you have the money.
sbranson01 3 weeks ago
@sbranson01
If I have enough money I have the "right" to break the law and get away with it, but if I'm poor and don't have any money I don't even get my basic rights.
Titus420ful 3 weeks ago
@learningmusic247 ahhh.... america... a free country. lol
PEREZ29MMA 2 weeks ago
@learningmusic247 people only have their rights abused because people like you believe you hold no power. the constitution still hasn't been burned. maybe you should try to read it once in a while
TheBuckley555 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@learningmusic247 people only have their rights abused because people like you believe you hold no power. the constitution still hasn't been burned. maybe you should try to read it once in a while
TheBuckley555 2 weeks ago
And what about the original arrest record? Just because the charges may have been dropped doesn't mean that the record of arrest disappears. You forgot to mention that. You forgot to mention that the arrest record has to be expunged also.
TheReturningShadow 1 month ago
@TheReturningShadow I think that varies state by state... Some states you just have to show the chief law enforcement agency that you were not convicted, and they will take it out of the public records search.
The interesting thing is that in the US, as soon as you are arrested all that information is usually available on a website. But in England, you actually have to be found guilty before that information becomes public record.
jjashmor 1 month ago
well it's quite obvious that the american legal system is a massive fail
theuglyhairmonster2 1 month ago
i am enraged because this happened to me and i got pulled over for not having a light bulb for my back license plate and the cop opened my door because he apparently smelled weed and took us out onto the curb and searched the whole car just to find my friend had 2 grams of weed and a grinder is it illegal for that to happen since i said i had no consent for searches
dendrok1 1 month ago
@dendrok1 That was legal he had probable cause, he used the no ligh tbulb to pull you and he smelled the weed. Therefore he can legally search the car.
jerryhowell9 1 month ago
I got pulled over when I was high as a fucking kite, getting head from a rock ho and blasting NWA's 'Fuck tha Police' at full volume. I forget how it ended but your mother's a whore.
maradona87 1 month ago
@maradona87 you sound SO cool....
daveslangsrocks 1 month ago
FUCK DA POLICE COMIN STRAIGHT FROM THE UNDERGROUND!!
xxHiiTMaN 1 month ago
I learned this on Law & Order too! Cause this dude had crack/drugs or whatever but they searched his stuff without a warrant and what not, so they couldn't even use the evidence they found. HAHA
MizzYungMacMar 1 month ago
But it'd make a lot more sense to just not have contraband.
element5333 1 month ago
@element5333 Yea because EVERYTHING illegal is bad.
ShdowSora 1 month ago
my dad got caught with meth and paraph and got off because the officer illegaly searched him just a couple months ago
SmokedOut1017 1 month ago
@SmokedOut1017 im sorry
87Nbrawl 1 month ago 2
this series of videos is really interesting, I live in australia here, but it makes me think that it's just a tutorial on how to get away with drug trafficing, and doing other illegal shit. this one is a prime example. it's teaching criminals how to not get in trouble! that's exactly the BAD side of having lawyers! because the criminal always has someone defending him! and this law, too
super6plx 1 month ago
@super6plx Regardless of whether your drug trafficking or not, it your right against unlawful searches and seizures. Whether you have 10 pounds of dope in your car or your just refusing the search for the reason its you car (and your right) it should all be the same. Your property, your right. And besides, the cops still get the drugs, you just cant get in trouble for it.
xXRyoZinXx 1 month ago
I live in Ontario, Canada. Are the laws same here as they are there? I am not sure
SkateOrDie7749 1 month ago
@SkateOrDie7749 HEY I LIVE IN CANADA TO
hello26580 1 month ago
@SkateOrDie7749 Canada and the USA are different countries.
ruskie20 1 month ago
@ruskie20 No shit. I just said I live in Canada. You don't think I realize they're different countries? Damn your dumb
SkateOrDie7749 1 month ago
@SkateOrDie7749 You're an idiot, Canada and the USA are different countries and they have different laws and regulations. Shows what complete ignoramus you truly are. So do me a favor, fuck off yeah?
ruskie20 1 month ago
@ruskie20 I know they are different countries, Alot of there laws are the same. You wouldn't know that because your a goofy ass Russian. You take stupidity to a whole nother level.
SkateOrDie7749 1 month ago
@SkateOrDie7749 lol dude you misspelled "a lot", "their", and "you're". It doesn't really help your case...
angelshalo 1 month ago
@angelshalo You take the time out of your life to come onto youtube and correct peoples spelling, That is just sad
SkateOrDie7749 1 month ago
@angelshalo You missed " other " when he put " nother ".
ruskie20 1 month ago
@SkateOrDie7749 I'm from the UK, I serve in the RAMC and was stationed in Russia you fucking twat. A bit obvious that you're an idiot, if the country is different, the laws are different. It doesn't matter if some are the same, the legal precautions always change. Just like you said, you take stupidity to a whole other level.
ruskie20 1 month ago
and all the pig has to say is that he smelled the pot and the whole search becomes legal under probable cause. The fourth amendment is meaningless people wake up!
MTVVH1sucks 1 month ago
First off, most police officers will not search you with no warrant, so refusing a search is very moronic. If you feel that you are now invincible and can now drive around with paraphernalia in your vehicle be our guest. This video isn't a great resemblance to reality.
Fiftee1Fiftee 1 month ago
I like this videos <3 me learning something i would learn in 1 school year :P
96Axl 1 month ago
ok if a Cop ask to search my car. let him. if you are Innocent you would let them. but those who say no and get mad. you are idiots.
USSWISCONSIN64 1 month ago
I'm a fellow pothead to but as americans we always think about our RIGHTS instead of our RESPONSIBILITIES to this country. such as voting, serving jury duty and stuff like that. in other words helping this country run via volunteer work. i think if we excersized our responsibilities then we deserve to be granted rights instead of abusing them for selfish reasons.
DFGDubstep 1 month ago
you gotta fight ..for your right ...toooo PPPAAARRRTTTYY!!!!
geonerd1000 1 month ago
can this be applied to Canada?
kalofimi 1 month ago
i was watching battlefield videos an hour ago how the hell did i get hear
Redreximus 1 month ago
Cops only see their side and see themselves as righteous coz they wear blue, don't they realise they need another world to watch over this one? And likely, a bigger one?? SIMPLE MATH geeeez. They make me rant even when I don't like doing so!
7ito1990 1 month ago
there is only Criminal Justice, not, Civilian or Moral, or Just Justice.
It is all a fools only play game. So if they are illegally searching us, why don't THEY pay up the damaged of our lawyer??
Oh, unless I can say I don't have the money to a lawyer, nor I want to spend if I have it... oh wait if I have it I must spend it, even though it's the cops fault.
WHERE IS THE JUSTICE????
7ito1990 1 month ago
@7ito1990 Well, there will be a lawsuit filed (most likely from the party searched) against the police officer. You will more than likely receive money for winning this case. Is that not justice enough? You pay for a lawyer, you win the suit, you are able to pay your lawyer and might even have some extra left :) That's the justice.
Fiftee1Fiftee 1 month ago
@Fiftee1Fiftee
Well, seeing so that he receives justice, it's just :)
Otherwise there is a strong possibility it's unjust.
But if it's common for that to happen, in terms of justice (again), then I humble down my reasoning and listen to yours as more valid :) or just valid :))
Thanks bro! Nice info :)) Hey check out Nassim Haramein, David Wilcock, Pete Peterson, Bashar, Project camelot. THey're awesome, this is my thanks to you :)
7ito1990 1 month ago
my problem with this is, it's all your word against the police officers' as to whether you said you don't consent to searches or not, and that's the judge's call and they will always side with the officer because 80% of the time the police officer will be telling the truth
iliketha 1 month ago
@iliketha That's why I put my phone in my armpit (weird i know), but I use the voice recorder function everytime I get stopped. I also ask the officer to state his name before I do anything, and if he asks why, i say "just to verify who you are in case i can't read your handwriting on the ticket/warning"
jberkhimer 1 month ago
@iliketha: Record everything, if legal in your state. That way an officer that disobeys the law can listen to his own voice bury him.
Pafoofnik1 1 month ago
This is what I hate. The law being "bent" because of legality bullshit. You don't' consent to a search and the cop searches you anyways, find a bag of cocaine on you that's obviously going to be distributed because your a fucking dumbs drug dealer, and you get off scott free because you said, "I don't consent to searches"? That's retarded. You still broke the fucking law and got caught! If anything the cop should be charged for breaking the law AND the drug dealer charged! bullshit!
crazybadcuber 1 month ago
@crazybadcuber yeah think of it another way, you sleep with a girl, turns out to be a cop's wife, he pulls you over, you say you don't consent, he plants drugs in your car, you'll be glad of the law against illegal searches then
iliketha 1 month ago
So like, what do you do if you say you dont consent & then they sill search you & you had like a body in the car or some shit? Wouldn't you be fucked regardless? I dont think that rule will aply here.
NickTheUTubeDude 1 month ago
If the government allowed drugs to be sold legally. We wouldnt be in a national debt
xXdarkredknight 1 month ago
@xXdarkredknight consider this your economy depends on illegal money from drugs to keep it propped up
research this
its true
also the government is involved in trafficing and has been decades read the book where the underground meets government and watch the doco the war on drugs
lethal1960 1 month ago
Ok, so if i say to a cop that pulled me over " i dont consent to searches" and he asks me to get out of the vehicle. What should i do? And seaches my body.
SmokeMeLightMeTagMe 1 month ago
what if your a minor
tito28671 1 month ago
@tito28671 you have no rights!
FSPKREW 1 month ago
I got 32 hours of CS because of a 5 sac of bud
Budsmokerhaha 1 month ago
I live in America...I literally want to move to the UK or something where the law isn't horrible.
brettmiddle 1 month ago
@brettmiddle the laws are just as retarded in the UK LOL
pussyenergydrink 1 month ago
So pretty much don't allow your car to smell of weed and be sure you are not driving recklessly when you have some on you. That gives officers probable cause and the legal right to search your vehicle. If on the other hand you have been pulled over for something completely unrelated to suspicious behavior, any drugs the cop finds in your car during an unlawful search cannot be held against you because the Constitution holds reign. But wait, too bad cops and perjury go hand in hand.
PsychoNinjaFreak 1 month ago
If you step out and are searched, be sure to say before hand (loudly) you do not consent to any searches, it is recorded on the cruiser's video camera and usable as evidence for the motion if the cop takes it that far. Do not say anything else at all.
Kancerous 1 month ago
Your experiences do not constitute as the legal or illegal procedure of upholding our law. The only things that constitute as PC is consent or exigent circumstances. For those that are too ignorant to understand that I will explain what that means. If you do not consent and have no contraband or weapons visible while in your car, he has no justification to ask you to step out at all, if you do it is at your own will, which arguably constitutes as complying to a search in a cops eyes.....
Kancerous 1 month ago
Comment removed
Kancerous 1 month ago
Unfortunately, its been my experience that if you are a teenager caught with some pot, you're pretty well fucked. Doesn't matter how the cop found it, what the law says, whether its probable cause or not. A teenager's word against a cop's is a losing battle.
duffmanthegreat 2 months ago
@duffmanthegreat
A teenager if smart enough has the police cruiser's camera on his side, think about that. The only way you will be legally caught with pot is if you are smoking it in front of him or it is visible from outside the vehicle, a smell DOES give PC to the officer, so crack your window, give license and registration and then close your window. You're not required to do anything past that point until the officer unlawfully detains you or lets you go.
Kancerous 1 month ago
do i atleast get my shit back that the officer took from me as evidence?
TheBaronvonbadass 2 months ago
How many honest judges are there? How many take the defendants side? VERY FEW.
dirtbikemike69 2 months ago
I TROLL U!
pakourmasta226 2 months ago
'Cause all police are douchebag agents of THE MAN
TheLegendofPatrick 2 months ago
stand up for your rights.
thatdudeonyourscreen 2 months ago 29
@thatdudeonyourscreen To bad the government just passed a bill called S. 1867 National Defense authorization Act Enabling martial Law in the United States. Now they can arrest you indefinitely without trial. The S.1867 bill is treason
GOD719 1 month ago
I don't know bout this. I was arrested for having an oz. of marijuana leaf in my car earlier this year. But I wasn't in my car. I was standing outside of it. And the officer wanted to search my car. I said "no I don't consent to a search" and he bullied me into doing it. My case was not thrown out. I have now have a class B felony
Voileen 2 months ago
@Voileen Isnt it obvious? frame the cop for possession lol, but i take everything too serious and hate cops, alternatively fuck with his car when hes off duty.
Timohawk 2 months ago
uhhh...this doesn't apply to black men sadly....unless the officer actually believes in law.
hotoodef747 2 months ago
Man I'm sure learning a lot on youtube XD
TheDarkBlastoise 2 months ago 62
So does that mean i can keep my weed?
123whatmeworry 2 months ago
@123whatmeworry They'll get rid of it because it's contraband.
x420xBOLTS4LIFE 2 months ago
>Implying the police won't just lie about it
DemoticVEVO 2 months ago
@DemoticVEVO That's why police are required to use cameras with audio capability. If they don't have the tapes then the courts are actually forced to take your word on it and the police officer who destroyed the tapes or never had it running will be reprimanded or suspended.
UltimaWeaponDeux 2 months ago 3