I just don't like women cause sure, they raise your kids till they can do stuff on their own (around maybe 10), but after that, they just sit on your hard earner money while you get up 4 am and work till 6 pm for their lazy ass.
I'm a 15 years old male that is (High school in AUS, middle school in USA), and i find this video disgracing because i have been doing University math or College math since i was 14 and i don't see a me on a TV show. This is because of useless woman thinking they are superior to men. feminists to be exact. I see they want to talk about biological reasons, OK. Women's body's are made for birth and and men are made for protecting and providing, men are built psychically better.FEMINISTS COME AT ME
On average, the difference in aptitude of men and women are negligible; however when it comes to the extremes, both retarded and genius, its a different story. Men have a greater variance in Math aptitiude and dominate both at the lower and upper end. Theres a reason why despite the gender gap closing in Math courses due to feminist radicals, theres still hardly an female Olympiads, Putnam fellows and no Fields medalist.
She says math scores are equal in countries where there is gender equity.
What she means is math scores are equal where feminists have stacked the deck against males and made educational institutions anti-male and where fewer males graduate from high school or go to college.
from the video 0:30 "Girls and boys in fact are now equal in average math scores."
Average math students are not accepted into top engineering and science programs let along offered jobs. With full access to any field of study, women continue to flock to the Humanities.
I'm a guy in high school and very good at math i did year 10 math when yr 6 and year 12 exams grade math is yr 9 so.... I think im definitely smarter than these girls.
America will never catch up to other countries when it comes to females and math.because of the attitude here towards women.Women in America are brainwashed to mutilate themselves with plastic surgery,keep their intellect and opinions to themselves ,discoiuraged by men that can't stand any woman getting anyhere in life.There's so much information that debunks these pop psychology books like Gurian.But since there's so many close minds here.BYE done with woman hatrers.Waste of time
I can't believe the sexism from the men here.My guess is you can't handle smart women,because you are threatened by them.A smart woman would have nothing to do with any of you.I see a deep hatred of women on this posting board.BYE
n December 24, 2006 at 8 o'clock in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Jackson was found dead. Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death. His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened. Turns out he was still signed into myspace. She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didnt repost a chain letter. if you dont repost this to 6 videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight.
We'll never know the answer because social sciences are not science. They start with a conclusion and look for evidence to support it rather than look at evidence first then draw a conclusion. Sociology is no better than creationism or astrology. I would just suggest that if someone likes and does well at math they should go for it and ignore any of this silly talk.
@jethrodassam that claim that women are better than men at everything not requiring physical strenght. Just empty postulates. Men are responsible almost exclusively for all technological advances made, all the great philosophers, all greatest guitarists, musicians, all the greatest cooks, all the greatest geniuses and I could go on.
@Sivels More men take IQ tests because in this sexist society,it is believed it's more important to have smart men.Another fact is,women have been discouraged from taking difficult subjects in school.When we see how girls are raised it's no wonder they grow up not using their full potential.I know a woman with an IQ of 191.She excels at math and spatial reasoning.Maybe it's her background who knows.Her dad is from a foreign country and always believed Americans are sexist which is true.
@rad7610884 "women have been discouraged from taking difficult subjects in school.When we see how girls are raised it's no wonder they grow up not using their full potential..." Huge amounts of government funds have gone to feminize the education system, academia in general is extremely feminized and anti-masculinity (because it's anti-authority) and promote feminine values as well as extra help for women. Women are like parasites being carried by men because that's what's expected of the men.
@Sivels However, men would feel less masculine if they didn't get to carry women sometimes. Though I agree, some women misuse men. However, some men misuse women.
what else could an idiot reporter think? He didnt even listen to what the girl said. ITS FUN you idiot forget the career. success is not everyone's only aim
Also, just because you appear to be ignoring it; Women apply themselves in non-physical tasks (and most physical tasks; though there are exceptions) just as well as men do.
There is, simply put, no evidence stating otherwise. In fact, current rates are in their favour.
It is also interesting (yes, I was reading up on the education shift you mentioned--I found nothing solid insofar :P) that boys are given more attention on average in school than girls (positive and negative).
The US gone overboard with helping women in education.
Women now make the majority of college enrollments, men being only 42% of the college students.
The schools are becoming more feminine friendly and way less masculine friendly.
It has been shown in several categories that men and boys are falling behind in education, but still women and women are alone are the primary concern still.
Things like female only college loans and other aids to help women, but not men must go away.
@ManSpeakOut men only want to point out hormone differences when it benifits men, but when it benifits women, men suddenly want to pretend we're the same. Please explain how school is at all or ever was masculine. Boys are naturally more wiggly and more aggressive, making it harder to pay attention. You can TRY to masculinise school, but I highly dought it would work.
@missyah101 We could if people would actually try, but an attemps has not even been made. Cause all the education system cares about is women.
Even though men are lagging behind women in college students, 42% of which being men making us the minority. Women still are getting special loans and other aids to help them with college and no special aids for men.
Its not that we can't, people are not even trying, or give a damn about men.
@missyah101 Boys respond to discipline, competition and physical exercise to run off their excess energy. These are all things that were once common in schools in the past, when the boys outperformed the girls. In the quest to improve the performance of girls, the education system has been feminised to the point were a high proportion of boys are completely turned off by it. I think the best solution is to teach boys and girls separately. The boys taught by men and the girls taught by women.
@SalaamAlaykum I see from your profile that you live in Iraq. I don't know what the educational opportunities are for girls there, but in the UK girls have had access to education for a long time.
For decades feminists have been complaining that girls were disadvantaged by the educational system and campaigning to make it more girl friendly. Now it is boys who are disadvantaged by the educational system. The response to this is to say suck it up and adapt! Can't you see the double standard?
@dalriada842 but the thing is...women and men are never equal. is there really a system that is truly fair, and makes girls and boys can compete on an equal basis? What I think is, it isn't the problem of the system. Girls beats boys at school is because they're more mature in their younger ages and fight hard at their academics. Meanwhile, boys especially the younger generation delay their maturity due to video games. If this continues, boys need to accept the reality of being beaten by girls
@SalaamAlaykum I do agree that girls of a particular age are more mature than boys of the same age. This is why I suggested that they should be educated separately in an earlier post. As others have also pointed out, the education system in the West, is very much biased towards promoting the interests of girls. I believe video games are a symptom of disaffection, and not the cause. They are not engaged by their schooling.
@dalriada842 yes I do agree boys seems not engaged by their schooling as boys like to go outdoor. but it's difficult to separate boys and girls in school. who should pay for the extra cost? and when should we combine girls and boys again? at university stage? And should we separate the public exam for the two gender? I am afraid that cause even more chaos. It is possible many girls who are academically superior will not enter the University they'd have entitled to.
@SalaamAlaykum I don't see that it would be difficult. Apart from the initial cost of reorganisation, why would it cost more on a sustained basis? I would keep them separate until university, to avoid hormonal distractions for both sexes. I would expect the final exams at school to be the same, so they are compared on a level playing field. Why do you assume that girls would be disadvantaged? I want both boys and girls to receive the best education possible!
@dalriada842 if final exams are the same, the results are the same: boys being beaten. the fact is girls are better in academics(generally). and you won't ask girls to play a football match with boys as another exam right? the problem is you can't make boys really sit down for long hours to study for an exam! the problem in academics is you really need to sit down, study, memorizing, agree to whatevertheauthorthinks.
@SalaamAlaykum " if final exams are the same, the results are the same"No,the different approaches to educating boys and girls are intended to get them to reach the same destination by a different route!I hated sports at school because my PE teachers were sadists. It is still a way to expend excess energy.It is a means to an end,not an end in itself.Boys would obliterate girls in a football exam:) Boys can study when the conditions are right.The female centred system at the moment prevents this!
@dalriada842 Maybe it's the male-centred social system that prevents boys from doing well in school. Ever considered that before?
I never had a problem paying attention in school (except in long-winded math classes--and yeah, I'm a guy :P); but I was 'interested' in history/english/science. Instead of cars; I liked jet engines. Instead of action shows, I liked the history channel and (a few) books.
It's boredom that messes with education. And that's a personality trait.
@jaieet I was able to pay attention in school too. You have to look at these issues as they affect boys and girls overall. The outliers don't represent the whole. I'm aware that there are cultural factors affecting boys performance in school, but these 'ride' on top of biological factors.
@dalriada842 Hormones and biology don't directly influence the degree of intelligence or extensive knowledge that you can display. Girls and boys both can compete and excel in all fields. The main issue seems to be--not the culture within our schools (which are blatantly unbiased up until the point you get a biased teacher); but the culture leading 'up' to school (barbies on one side; soldiers on the other)
@jaieet Biology most certainly does affect the degree of intelligence. The intelligence of boys tends to have a greater spread. There are both more boys at the upper AND lower levels of intelligence. Girls tend to cluster more around the mean. Hormones affect concentration levels, either in terms of high spirits or attraction to the opposite sex. I disagree that schools are 'blatantly unbiased'. Watch manwomanmyth's videos on education.
@jaieet My brother is a secondary school teacher. When he was a student, a group of them visited a primary school. The female students were allowed to be alone with the pupils, and had refreshments in the staffroom afterwards. The male students were NOT allowed to be alone with the pupils, and were REFUSED entry to the staffroom. They had to use another room. This apartheid reflects the view that all men are paedophiles and rapists. This anti-male perspective will prejudice the education of boys
@dalriada842 Not that this is really an 'issue'. =P As long as the person calling the shots is fit to do so, they should! There's no 'battle of the sexes' that we haven't invented in our own heads.
And just cause I have to say it; we really shouldn't just 'separate' the sexes in school. That could be disastrous later in life. That's the kind of thing that you'd really need to think through thoroughly before attempting (if current sex-specific schools are anything to go by)
@jaieet Single sex schools tend to have better academic results. There is a conflict between the view that differences are innate versus cultural. Evolutionary psychology recognises that there are innate differences between the sexes. You appear to prefer the cultural explanation
I view men and women as complementary to each other. We tend to have the opposite strengths and weaknesses. I do believe in a 'level playing field' and equal rights, as there is a considerable degree of overlap however.
@dalriada842 Indeed; you hit the cultural and personal VS academic education point right on the head; so I'll not go too much into that exploratory point've view (it's all trial and speculation right now anyways, far as I know :P).
Now;
The male VS female student example at primary school is NOT a representation of our/your country's form or forum of education on the whole. It has an incredible list of factors; ranging from community acts/crimes/victims/rumours or even teacher bias.
@dalriada842 Biology IS a factor in hormonal interests; and it obviously makes boys more competitive (on average) than girls.
However, it does not--as far as I know--dictate our interests. That 'is' a cultural phenomenon. And differring social environments spawning different ideals/interests/hobbies is very solid evidence of exactly that.
Hobbies directly influence what you learn about; as well as how much you take in. Personality has a part in this; but.. no clue on how to definitively fix that
@jaieet People tend to like doing what they are good at. I agree that environment influences our interests, but our innate capabilities are a bigger influence. Boys tend to be better at logical and visual-spatial tasks. Girls tend to be better at human relations and linguistic tasks. Boys tend to prefer the stem subjects whilst girls tend to prefer the humanities. Coincidence? I think not!
@jaieet Girls are hailed as multi-taskers, but the opposite of that is single-tasking which boys tend to do. The former is usually hailed as an unqualified advantage.
For many things it is useful, but not for all. Single-tasking allows intense focus on a problem. Boys tend to do this better, when they are interested in something. I believe this is why most inventors and researchers are men!
@dalriada842 You can believe what ever you like. :P If women can (in mass) join the military and surpass their male counterparts; or join the research field and surpass their male counterparts, then obviously there's a gaping hole/inconsistency in that trail of though (and it's not like successful and/or educated women are rare, after all).
@jaieet :) There is so much wrong with the underlying assumptions that you make here, that I could spend forever trying to disentangle them! You should go and watch manwomanmyth's series of videos on education and other issues. I suggest that you just watch them though, and refrain from commenting, as he has been known to tear feminists a new arsehole in the comments section!
Women surpass men in the military! This made me laugh! My brother was in the air-force before he retrained as a teacher.
@dalriada842 "There is so much wrong with the underlying assumptions that you make, that I am completely incapable of providing any counter argument here; so I won't. Go watch videos that should have provided me with some information I could use to generally negate your opinion." :P
Isn't it interesting the way you imply that when a woman succeeds, it's society's fault; but if she fails, men are awesome--even in male-dominated and shaped industries such as business? =P
@jaieet You shouldn't use quotes when it isn't a quote of my words :P There's little point in me spending forever trying to explain things that are already better explained on this guy's channel. I've already watched all of his videos. We've also high-jacked the comments on this video.
I implied no such thing! You merely inferred that, incorrectly! I have no problem with women succeeding when it's merited.
@dalriada842 The air force? Are you implying that women can't fly planes? :P
I personally know a girl who came second in an interstate hand-to-hand combat session; and first in a marksmanship contest (only with rifles, though).
Even if you could objectively argue that the men went 'easy' on her in the h2h contest (at least one obviously did not :P), what's the excuse for rifle use?
Evidently, men are not inherently better.
Y'know if silly arguments like that didn't exist feminism wouldn't either
@jaieet Flying is only a tiny part of the air-force. The main role of ALL the services is soldiering. Female athletes tend to perform at the level of 13.5 year old boys. This is why you don't see mixed sports. The physical training for female soldiers is much easier, and the men in their group have to carry some of their load. There is also unofficial pressure to pass women who have failed non-physical training courses, due to political pressure to increase the numbers of females.
@dalriada842 Your 5% statistic is also almost definitively incorrect. Where you got it, I'll never know. :P But I would LIKE to. Could you please tell me?
No--a video doesn't count. =P
With that said; sport and physique are predominantly associated with the biological traits I admitted the existance of earlier (not like you can deny a fact).
It still does not denote the unemployment or education rates; nor the fact that women are just as likely to succeed as men.
@jaieet The best 5% of women perform at the average for the men. Most are far below this. I used to have a humorous video on it but it's disappeared from my favourites:( I don't discount the odd Amazon though!
Many have trouble using military issue weapons because they either lack the strength, or their hands are too small to reach the trigger. Most can't throw grenades far enough to avoid blowing themselves up in the process! Twice as many women required to carry a stretcher as for men. etc.
@dalriada842 Oh really? Interesting... So most females who have the qualifications to fight in combat cannot throw grenades properly or carry stretchers without having double the numbers as men... VERY interesting. Especially the part about you denying that you inferred a flying argument - the single coherent argument that is pro to your stance. :P
Don't believe me? Google up the G-force argument against women serving in fighter planes. I would suggest you keep that one on hand.
@jaieet I never denied anything about a flying argument. There are a lot of factors that determine flying ability, including visual-spatial ability. Those facts come from a US military report. They changed their procedures as a result of general female feebleness. Women are essentially mascots in the military. Kept away from as much risk as possible, but paid the same as the men!
Had you watched the education videos on the channel I suggested, you would know how the changes occurred in the UK.
No video; I care not for unfactored impressionable and indemonstrable opinions. I would like some solid evidence. If you can provide a credible source, I'll know what to search for to find another. If you cannot, then the point is not moot or void; but I would heavily suggest learning some even-handedness. It only serves to irritate others if you play the victim all the time.
@jaieet "It only serves to irritate others if you play the victim all the time." My education was a conservative one that largely pre-dates the current disaster. I'm not "playing the victim". I'm criticising a harmful change in our society.
Your unwillingness to make any effort doesn't inspire me to spoon-feed you with information. I suspect you of being a troll whose only interest is in spinning out a worthless conversation for as long as possible. This conversation is terminated!
@dalriada842 Oh yeah? Well your unwillingness to provide any information doesn't inspire me to put in any effort. =P
You can 'suspect' whatever you like. I 'suspect' that's very closely related to why you may 'suspect' women control the most important aspects of our society (and, yet, cannot compete with men).
I would just like some relevant key terms; as well as the name of that military report, and even a single educational shift that was pro-fem.
@dalriada842 It is ironic that our society is formed specifically 'around' female equality--especially given the severely vocal opinion that feminism is wrong; and the girls simply aren't suited to certain industries (it is so easy to point at business, don'tcha think? =P).
Educate me; at what point in our recent history has our educational system switched to favour females? Up until recently, men outperformed them regularly.
According to your theory, there was a major shift.
@dalriada842 If you want to go as far as saying 'most of ____ are men', then it's easy to point at the majority of school leavers being men; or the unemployment ratio being dominated by men.
In contrast, you can point at women--as a percentage--achieving degrees of higher learning (Uni/College) in greater amounts and more often cases than men are.
You could 'also' point at their recent trend of sliding into the business industry; a predominantly male-dominated area in the past.
@jaieet I don't disagree with most of this. This is the essence of the debate! Women and girls are getting superior treatment in our society. In the case of the business industry, much of this is due to positive discrimination (AKA affirmative action). Of course this is an oxymoron, there is nothing positive about it. It is discrimination against men, particularly white men! Even straight white men!! That's me by the way:(
@dalriada842 In Australia and America particularly, women are outperforming men (as a percentage). This is not people skills. That's almost sexist. :P
Any rationale that men are 'better' is just as silly as any fanatic feminism ideals. Some things we do have an edge on due to our physical make; but, aside from small edges (which are easily compensated for), both sides are just as good as each other.
@jaieet I'm saying that men are better at some things, and women are better at other things. What is wrong with that? It is not just physical things! I make no claim that men are better overall! Men and women should be complementary to each other. Vive la difference!
@SalaamAlaykum It is true, generally, that boys are a little more 'fidgety' than girls when it comes to schoolwork. But boys are also generally more 'competitive' and 'ambitious' when it comes to schoolwork, as well.
Practical and/or physical tasks tend to appeal to the (general) male school population. They also appeal to most girls; but the difference in concentration in regards to these separate approaches is more notable in boys.
Definitely not feminised; but practical tasks wouldn't hurt.
Whats funny is that western society can claim women are superior to men.
but if men like summers claim men are better then women at something its discrimination.
We all know what happened to summers, he got fired for speaking about this.
and the fact that during the recession 80% of jobs created during this time period went to women, but the western world ignores such things cause men are not important, only women are.
@lewtube the majority of teachers have almost always been female dumbass, and school hasn't actually changed that much. School in itself is naturaly more feminine then it is masculine. Not saying girls are smarter, just that girls hormones makes then more equipped for education...sorry :)
If men are better at something like summers says men are better at math, the western world pushes to close that gap, but if men lag behind in something we all just say its the way it is and lets it go
This is why men are lagging behind now in education because the magnifying glass is solely on women's side of the room
By making school more and more feminine friendly and not also making it masculine friendly, cause of this men are being ignored in education.
@missyah101 Plus I heavily disagree that girls hormones make them more equipped for education.
Almost every single technological marvel was invented by the hands of men. Even the computer you used to type your comment on to this web page was made by men. The house you live in was built by men, the car you drive invented and built by men. Almost everything was invented by men, and saying they are not as capable of education and learning is miles off the mark.
It really doesn't matter if women are subjected to grade inflation. The school system makes money off increasing tuitions and swelling student enrollmment. It has been shown to be easier to entice women to go to college. Employers, however, need qualified workers. Engineering and other scientific work is still the domain of men with less than 10% female participation. Why don't women even apply for thos jobs? The US should refocus on men for this.
When Rushton and colleagues weighted each SAT question by an established general intelligence factor called the g-factor, they discovered that males surpassed females by an average of 3.6 IQ points.
@XxFATfishxX Consider the changes to both the PSAT and SAT. The PSAT doubled the weight of verbal in its score while reducing the complexity of the math. The SAT also eliminated higher math. This inflates female scores. If women were indeed better at math, such modifications to standardized tests would not be necessary.
Very few in the younger generations in the U.S. have strong verbal/grammar skills. The causes are teachers today themselves have poor verbal/grammar skills-they can't teach what they themselves don't know, and the media. The verbal errors that I hear many people making are "this is the most unique... The other is fewer/less. There are no degrees of unique. Something is either unique (one of a kind) or it is not. Use fewer with discrete items (like pencils) and less with items you can't count.
Very few in the younger generations in the U.S. have strong verbal/grammar skills. The causes are teachers today themselves have poor verbal/grammar skills-they can't teach what they themselves don't know, and the media. The verbal errors that I hear many people making are "this is the most unique... The other is fewer/less. There are no degrees of unique. Something is either unique (one of a kind) or it is not. Use fewer with discrete items (like pencils) and less with items you can't coount.
Very few in the younger generations in the U.S. have strong verbal/grammar skills. The causes are teachers today themselves have poor verbal/grammar skills-they can't teach what they themselves don't know, and the media. The verbal error that I hear many people making are "this is the most unique... There are no degrees of unique. Something is either unique (one of a kind) or it is not.
oh good their closing the gap...by making girls more competent and educated? think again: that gap is being closed primarily because of the neglect of the boys' educational needs, and the disparate amnt of resouces denied them in favor of catering to the females. these people would rather everyone be equally SCREWED than admit any natural difference between the sexes, and their doing a damn fine job of it. the US is down DOZENS of rankings in education compared to other countries since 1950.
These are evil women trying to explain away their own insecurities by putting forward all women. Only a dishonest person would equalize women to men in technical and mathematical fields. I have MSc degrees in both - most women are able to learn by hart and believe they understand what they learned but very rarely actually understand and make progress. In the current educational system boys are suppressed so girls excel, so boys give up as they naturally dislike playing with dolls. 9/11 truth.
ok first i like to state that it is only fair to ask boys as a share of a girls vs boys vid as both sides want to be better or at least think there better. GOD created all men and woman equal so i think that as we all have different aturbites we should not have to dissuss it and asking a girl " do you think girls are better then boys" in anything or vis versa is just bias, pride, and seist.
at basic math level skills, girls and boys are pretty close to equal (like 10 or 20 point difference in average SAT), but at high-level competitive mathematics, there is an overwhelming dominance of males. among the top scorers of the usa math olympiad, there's usually only 1 girl for every 40 or so guys.
yes,edu system may favor girls,but think about previous ages, he farming system favors men and that's why men rules.and why the society need more schools? because we need to inHERit our civilization, knowledge.Those blaming the edu system failing boys are fundamentally same as feminist who blame farming favors men!
as we step into a knowledge, mechanical age, we need an edu system.I predict women are leaders from now on.As a boy who is taught to behave by female teachers,i'm happy women rules!
Why is it wrong to blame education system for failing boys if that's reality? Because that would be politically incorrect? People used to blame edu-system for failing girls and measures were taken to help girls out, now when boys are falling behind it is because girls are smarter not because system is failing boys?
The reason for the closing of the gender academic gap is the fact schools are failing boys. I'll bet a million bucks those "other countries" they are talking about are other western countries where feminism has ruined the society. School curriculums have become more girl-biased and are almost exclusively taught BY WOMEN. Things which boys respond to (competition and leadership) has been replaced with things girls respond to (Methodical work and attentiveness).
If females were 'not equal' in the past because of nurture based syndromes and profound and simple discriminations, then how come those same nurture phenom could not be responsible now for whatever gender data?
It is obvious that the west has many [_unconstitutional_] female-only policies and an anti male tenor. That is not relevant to why males as a group are falling behind?
What these good ladies here haven't seemed to have noted is that the pre-university school system is now highly feminized. Some 80% of secondary school teachers are women. But boys need masculine role models in order to repond well and remain motivated. Boys will grow to be men. So they need male role models they can emulate. This is not to diminish the achievements of girls, but far too many boys with great potential are now failing. This will skew success rates in favour of girls.
they should have had a male and a female research it- not two women- hehe... they may have gotten the stats wrong. okay just a joke ;) I'm sure there are tons of women better at math than myself
@DexterBoyGenius33 Maybe you are not so wrong. Those with pro female agendas when it comes to comparing or including males are routinely biased, slanted, and rationalizing away conclusions to fit their agenda. BTW, women outright lie? Of course not. Never (eyes rolling here).
No doubt. There are a few women that do very well in math. The real question is who cares? The US is spending a lot of time, money and effort to bring women up in math without spending the same to bring men up in verbal. Many claims are made that the US will be more competitive with more women in technical fields and in college, but we are seeing that both foreign men and women (Japan/TaiwanKorea and Germany/France) are exceeding US men.
@sting444 Groups like the American Association of University Women will never allow it. They launch vicious lobbying campaigns against any legislation that is aimed at helping males in education. They are the hate mongers of the new century!
@Runz32 yeah, and there's also this mentality that the boys in the class will be just fine because they're just boys. Not ALL guys are better in math, and not ALL girls are better at verbal. If a person (regardless of gender) is struggling, that person should be able to get help from their instructor. Too bad teachers aren't willing to pull kids aside at younger (and shyer) ages and help them to succeed. Oh well.
@Runz32 True. That is one very aggressive misandry organization. A boys entire educational experience is now very negative and anti-male so it is not surprising that boys are tuning out schooling.
actually a study within the America's in 2008 has proven that statement wrong. Women are as proficient in math as men nowadays. Likewise with men and language arts. I myself am doing college algebra in 7th grade along with my peers in the incredibly gifted STEM class. The ratio of girls and boys in my class has, as a matter of fact, more girls. But only by 4 more people. And we all, girls and boys, excel in Science(S), Technology(T), Engineering(E), and Math(M).
It was men who started and ended wars it was men who invented religion to manipulate people and enslave certain minority groups including women. It is men who beat the shit out of their children and their wives. It is men who rape, it is men who comit paedophilia, it is men who decide to cut their oxygen supply while jacking off; It is men who fuck corpses (necrophilia), it is men who do all kinds of gross things and still have the nerves to fill themselves with an un-deserving pride..
@mtavares92 You that is very true. The funny this is, I'm a nice guy and yet I never get the girl. Women always claim men are worthless, but it's because they always look at the bad men, men who are badasses; the men women like. And when they do get beaten, raped, etc. they think all men are like that because they never tried the nice smart guy because he was a loser, sitting at lunch by himself.
you know, thats a common misconception of what reality truly is.
Women do fall in love with the nice guy, and there is a difference between dating a jock just for the hell of it and having a real commited relationship.
Women don't look only at "bad men". They look at men who have confidence. Self-confidence attracts women, charismatic men attracts women. It just happens to be that some of those jock assholes eventually beat the shit out of their partners for some reason
True, but statistics prove that women, more often that not when choosing the jock, happen to choose the jock assholes that beat them? Why, because they dated without really knowing them.
maybe women don't date you because you never actually talk to them ?
obviously, if someone sits alone in a bench at lunch all by himself, that person can either be a psycopath serial killer or the nicest, sweeatest guy on Earth, no one will ever give you the oportunity to settle and have a talk if you dont come to them first
Women date all sorts of men.. because there are also all sorts of women ! and even a girl who is "on the other side" can date a nerd
@mtavares92 Seriously? You believe religion was invented for manipulation and enslavement only? Religion can often keep people in line, like if you're a strong believer in Christianity. Religion gives people hope, religion gives people strength, and religion can give people a set of rules that make our world heck of a lot better than it could be. Also, women CAN be as cruel as a man, women CAN do disgusting things, and women can also decide to masturbate. See? Women can do anything a man can do
@Qyarx Yeah. We know they CAN be as cruel as men. But the vast majority ISN'T because they are not as vile as men.
And if you pay real attention, you'll see religion always brings more harm than good.
Besides... all the hope you'll ever get with religion is the Ilussion of happiness and security, and a life after death. And if you ask me, I'd rather know the truth then pray to a void of nothing.
Being happy with false hopes and lies is just as wrong as a friendship with dishonesty
@mtavares92 You know what's vile? Prostitution. And who does most of that? I think you know the answer. And women sell themselves not because men want it, it's purely for $ . Also, go ahead and know the "truth", but what I know is that people who see this illusion of happiness and security, tend to have MUCH happier lives than those that don't. So really, this "illusion" you speak of, makes people live good lives, so at the end of the road, it won't even matter if life after death even exists.
@Qyarx So you blame women for chosing a career that brings them money, when the only thing they have to do is fuck.
That sounds.. pretty easy don't you think.
And actually, it's a win-win scenario. The man improves his self-esteem and ejects his weekly sperm payload delivery and the woman gets out with a quick buck.
@mtavares92 I'm sorry, I missed the part where prostitution was a good thing. And whats so wrong? Last time I checked, prostitution was illegal, and guess what? It still is.
@Qyarx By the way.. when you said. "And who does most of that?"
Trust me, there are A LOT more men willing to fuck for a buck than women. That doesn't mean they sell their "services" for sexual purposes thought more than women.
You might want to take that into consideration before opening your mouth.
Not by any chance that 90 % of the porno industry is directly aimed at MEN. While it's the "bitches" of women who are evil, and impure that run that business.
@mtavares92 Okay then, one more thing. Try going to Miami at night and just take a stroll down the streets, and we'll see how many women ask you if you're looking for a good time, if you are a guy at least. And, women don't usually pay those men who are willing to "f*#k for a buck" that you speak of, because it's usually women who have more success flaunting their bodies. And still, the porno industry wouldn't exist, if there weren't women willing to blatantly expose themselves for money.
@mtavares92 And, I can't help but notice that you're extremely sexist. I don't know about you, but sexism is stupid no matter what gender you are. I don't believe that women are superior, nor do I believe that men are superior as well. However, it does tick me off when people are extremely ignorant in seeing how many insanely nice people there are for both genders.I'd even protect women if some douche was being sexist against them, and you mtavares are no different.Quit being such a sexist geez.
You're definetly mentally retarded or just plain fucking stupid.
You sir, don't belive women are as equal as men no matter how hard you try to fool yourself. That's why you can't even stand the word "fuck", and believe that prostitution is a sin. Unconsciently (and directly), you blame women for it and you consider whores to be souless harpies.
Well guess what, their human. As human as you and me. AND IT'S JUST A "FUCKING" JOB.
@mtavares92 lol, you can try to tell me what I think about gender equality, but it still doesn't change the fact that I think men and women are EQUAL. Never in my life, am I going to think it's ok just to have sex with a random person for money, and you know why? It's not even my Christian values that tell me it's wrong, it's the fact that whores want to sell themselves to a person they don't even know. Are they only worth the money they're being paid?
@mtavares92 The fact that I dislike prostitutes because they don't treat themselves like a human being, is completely rational. Being a whore, is like being a toy to someone else.You play with it, then throw it away.These women deserve to be treated like people, not just toys for pleasure.Also, penis and vagina are hardly sinful words dumbass.And I don't swear b/c I'm not a dirty mouthed idiot.There's people who have happy families, I can't say you'll be part of one with your sexist attitude,
@mtavares92 lol, it was just an expression, but anyway, the whole point of sex is to try to produce a child, correct? Then why share this action with someone you're not going to raise a baby with? Sex, in my opinion, is misused a lot, and put in lots of movies, and then teens everywhere just want to screw each other and wish they didn't.
@Qyarx Well you know what, I believe it is something only to be used by "desperate men".
Lonely men. i dunno. 38 year old virgins. Personnaly, I dont think I would ever visit a strip club or go to a ho club. That because I believe love is an essencial element in having sex.
Also, in a strip club I think i would feel sorry for those women. Not because they are flashing their titties, but because ignorant dumb men are objectifying while they are there trying to pay the rent.
@mtavares92 lol, it was just an expression as in you just hump em and dump em, but anyway, the whole point of sex is to try to produce a child, correct? Then why share this action with someone you're not going to raise a baby with? Sex, in my opinion, is misused a lot, and put in lots of movies, and then teens everywhere just want to screw each other and wish they didn't.
You believe that god created our species and the universe along with all the things that are in it right?
So, given that god is omnipotent and omniscient, he must have known eventually we would be fucking for no reason, just for pleasure. And that mean's that is part of god's ALLMIGHTY design, because "everything happens according god's will".
So no worries my friend. if god allowed us to spawn to make prostituion available that means he aproves it :)
Your saying that a woman shouldnt sell herself to another person.
Well first lets clear one point:: Whores don't sell themselves. That would be slavery, something you as a good christian should know about, which clearly is not the case.
The man who pays does not own the woman at any times, not even during the act of sex. ...
@mtavares92 Ok then, women shouldn't "rent" themselves to another person lol, but still, the act of sex is something personal, and should be treated with respect and responsibility.
It should be treated with respect and responsibility. Psychologically forcing your girlfriend to get you laid is not something a man should do. That is immature and stupid.
But just fucking is just making your penis a bit happier.
I believe you hold some missplaced prejudice against that, that you don't fully understand but still can't shake the idea that this is somewhat a wrong thing.
I get it, and I don't blame ya. But try making it simpler to see
This is why I think your ultimate prejudice involves the act of sex, but since you have absolutly no problem with that as you made clear in your responses, then all prostituon is is a service.
A service where one party gets what he wants, and the other is paid in return.
Pure simple business.
Now, if you have some weird supersticion consisting of two people having to actually know eachother in order to first fuck now that's another story..
@mtavares92 Well, yes, that's my superstition, I mean, at LEAST go on a date, and get to know each other better, maybe then it would be a bit ok to have sex afterwards. I'm not saying at all, that sex should be restricted before marriage, contrary to Christian values, because it's a completely natural process that can happen between lovers and can hardly be stopped. Also, I really, don't like the idea of sex being a business, it has a purpose, and it's to bring a daughter or son into this world.
@Qyarx many purposes are just about the dumbest abstract shit invented by humankind.
If you add a purpose to a child's life, then you can say that an unborn human baby's life is either worthless or the most beautifull thing in the world.
@mtavares92 Hmm, I did say the purpose of SEX was to produce a child, but still, an unborn baby has the potential to do anything, and if you raise him/her correctly, he/she won't end up being a prick.
@mtavares92 But, a fetus does have the potential of life, doesn't it? I mean, it has the potential to live a life outside of it's mom, but anyway, I agree that not everything's purpose is to be followed. Take rock-climbing for example, the whole purpose was to overcome and scale a mountain or wall, but now it's also a sport that's fun!
I just don't like women cause sure, they raise your kids till they can do stuff on their own (around maybe 10), but after that, they just sit on your hard earner money while you get up 4 am and work till 6 pm for their lazy ass.
patmiass4eva 20 hours ago
on average men are better then women in math, take a look at poker where men completly dominate women in the game.
wildy774 1 day ago
1:13 wtf is that thing?
Selotrum 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video is popular on Ljubljana
elijahunderw25 2 weeks ago
I dont care if girls are smarter than us . It's been proven we have better lives than them so yeah .........
TheVideogame360 3 weeks ago
@TheVideogame360 Sure, all the guys in the world have the same exact lifestyle.
kriSongs 3 weeks ago
I'm a 15 years old male that is (High school in AUS, middle school in USA), and i find this video disgracing because i have been doing University math or College math since i was 14 and i don't see a me on a TV show. This is because of useless woman thinking they are superior to men. feminists to be exact. I see they want to talk about biological reasons, OK. Women's body's are made for birth and and men are made for protecting and providing, men are built psychically better.FEMINISTS COME AT ME
oliverhallblack 1 month ago
On average, the difference in aptitude of men and women are negligible; however when it comes to the extremes, both retarded and genius, its a different story. Men have a greater variance in Math aptitiude and dominate both at the lower and upper end. Theres a reason why despite the gender gap closing in Math courses due to feminist radicals, theres still hardly an female Olympiads, Putnam fellows and no Fields medalist.
Max07129 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bunch of lies! there is no equality! examine the statistics.
userek69 6 months ago
so one or 2 girls disproves the rule? and why is it that its still men that invent the few things that are still left to invent?
TENNSUMITSUMA 6 months ago
Math sucks!
Uk12Us 6 months ago
She says math scores are equal in countries where there is gender equity.
What she means is math scores are equal where feminists have stacked the deck against males and made educational institutions anti-male and where fewer males graduate from high school or go to college.
That's what feminists mean by "equality".
gamenode 7 months ago 7
from the video 0:30 "Girls and boys in fact are now equal in average math scores."
Average math students are not accepted into top engineering and science programs let along offered jobs. With full access to any field of study, women continue to flock to the Humanities.
feministsAreCorrupt 7 months ago
We can clearly see that these women mathematicians are masculine brains trapped in a woman's body.
FreddyFuFu 7 months ago
The whole question is just stupid, if you have time to think about this you need to start doing something with your time.
xXSparky117Xx 7 months ago
I'm a guy in high school and very good at math i did year 10 math when yr 6 and year 12 exams grade math is yr 9 so.... I think im definitely smarter than these girls.
oliverhallblack 8 months ago
@oliverhallblack
School subjects doesn't tell that u're wise. U're just good at math...
Hyyra 7 months ago
u girls beat me i suk at math im good at science
andrewgmu1 9 months ago
@andrewgmu1 You can't suck at maths and actually be good at science.
mrfrankincense 8 months ago
@andrewgmu1 u need to be good at math in order to be good in science.
MrSavagegamer 6 months ago
I'm in a math/physics/chemistry class.
We're eleven boys and eighteen girls.
And this is the class where there are most boys.
Lythya 9 months ago
America will never catch up to other countries when it comes to females and math.because of the attitude here towards women.Women in America are brainwashed to mutilate themselves with plastic surgery,keep their intellect and opinions to themselves ,discoiuraged by men that can't stand any woman getting anyhere in life.There's so much information that debunks these pop psychology books like Gurian.But since there's so many close minds here.BYE done with woman hatrers.Waste of time
rad7610884 10 months ago
@rad7610884 Wish you were still here.:(
cubicaljane 10 months ago
I can't believe the sexism from the men here.My guess is you can't handle smart women,because you are threatened by them.A smart woman would have nothing to do with any of you.I see a deep hatred of women on this posting board.BYE
rad7610884 10 months ago
sorry but i dont understand english well. What is the result? There is no differences or?
recklesspower 11 months ago
n December 24, 2006 at 8 o'clock in the morning, a young 14 year old boy by the name of Scott Jackson was found dead. Doctors couldn't come up with the cause of his death. His mother checked his emails to see if she could figure out what happened. Turns out he was still signed into myspace. She found he had gone to sleep after he read and didnt repost a chain letter. if you dont repost this to 6 videos a girl with no face will kill you tonight.
dragonszsdsd 11 months ago
I wanna bang Janet Mertz.
BrettSchall 11 months ago 2
We'll never know the answer because social sciences are not science. They start with a conclusion and look for evidence to support it rather than look at evidence first then draw a conclusion. Sociology is no better than creationism or astrology. I would just suggest that if someone likes and does well at math they should go for it and ignore any of this silly talk.
cavejourney 11 months ago
@cavejourney Well put.
BrettSchall 11 months ago
It's being discovered more and more how women are better than men at anything not requiring much physical strength.
jethrodassam 11 months ago
@jethrodassam lol, feminist articles with no link attached.
Sivels 10 months ago
@Sivels What do you mean?
jethrodassam 10 months ago
@jethrodassam that claim that women are better than men at everything not requiring physical strenght. Just empty postulates. Men are responsible almost exclusively for all technological advances made, all the great philosophers, all greatest guitarists, musicians, all the greatest cooks, all the greatest geniuses and I could go on.
Sivels 10 months ago
@Sivels Oh, Can't debate any of that. Owned :(
jethrodassam 10 months ago
@jethrodassam oh.. You seemed pretty confident by claiming what you did in your original comment. Do you just believe things point blank?
Sivels 10 months ago
@Sivels Not usually, but I know when I'm licked.
jethrodassam 10 months ago
@jethrodassam lol.
Sivels 10 months ago
@Sivels It's the old boys cluib that kept women out,not lack of ability.
rad7610884 10 months ago
@rad7610884 men on average have 3-5 iq points more than women. Even the areas where women have not been 'kept out', men excel women.
Sivels 10 months ago
@Sivels More men take IQ tests because in this sexist society,it is believed it's more important to have smart men.Another fact is,women have been discouraged from taking difficult subjects in school.When we see how girls are raised it's no wonder they grow up not using their full potential.I know a woman with an IQ of 191.She excels at math and spatial reasoning.Maybe it's her background who knows.Her dad is from a foreign country and always believed Americans are sexist which is true.
rad7610884 10 months ago
@rad7610884 "women have been discouraged from taking difficult subjects in school.When we see how girls are raised it's no wonder they grow up not using their full potential..." Huge amounts of government funds have gone to feminize the education system, academia in general is extremely feminized and anti-masculinity (because it's anti-authority) and promote feminine values as well as extra help for women. Women are like parasites being carried by men because that's what's expected of the men.
Sivels 10 months ago 3
@Sivels However, men would feel less masculine if they didn't get to carry women sometimes. Though I agree, some women misuse men. However, some men misuse women.
Goes both ways.
Lythya 9 months ago
what else could an idiot reporter think? He didnt even listen to what the girl said. ITS FUN you idiot forget the career. success is not everyone's only aim
h0wud0in2 1 year ago
Also, just because you appear to be ignoring it; Women apply themselves in non-physical tasks (and most physical tasks; though there are exceptions) just as well as men do.
There is, simply put, no evidence stating otherwise. In fact, current rates are in their favour.
It is also interesting (yes, I was reading up on the education shift you mentioned--I found nothing solid insofar :P) that boys are given more attention on average in school than girls (positive and negative).
... facts? =P
jaieet 1 year ago
nature can"t be wrong for thousands years man always was 1 step forward other way
who want woman like that bold one :)
aisteroman 1 year ago
I wish in this "equal" society that everything didn't evolve around women.
WhatIsItToBurn 1 year ago
i find it hard to believe that chick with the reseeding hair line is a chick
ThePixelPwner 1 year ago
The US gone overboard with helping women in education.
Women now make the majority of college enrollments, men being only 42% of the college students.
The schools are becoming more feminine friendly and way less masculine friendly.
It has been shown in several categories that men and boys are falling behind in education, but still women and women are alone are the primary concern still.
Things like female only college loans and other aids to help women, but not men must go away.
ManSpeakOut 1 year ago
I suck at math
NeccoWecco 1 year ago
I got here by somebody posting the example comments
apkillua6 1 year ago
0:32
Batman abs
squwip 1 year ago
@ManSpeakOut men only want to point out hormone differences when it benifits men, but when it benifits women, men suddenly want to pretend we're the same. Please explain how school is at all or ever was masculine. Boys are naturally more wiggly and more aggressive, making it harder to pay attention. You can TRY to masculinise school, but I highly dought it would work.
missyah101 1 year ago
@missyah101 We could if people would actually try, but an attemps has not even been made. Cause all the education system cares about is women.
Even though men are lagging behind women in college students, 42% of which being men making us the minority. Women still are getting special loans and other aids to help them with college and no special aids for men.
Its not that we can't, people are not even trying, or give a damn about men.
ManSpeakOut 1 year ago
@missyah101 Boys respond to discipline, competition and physical exercise to run off their excess energy. These are all things that were once common in schools in the past, when the boys outperformed the girls. In the quest to improve the performance of girls, the education system has been feminised to the point were a high proportion of boys are completely turned off by it. I think the best solution is to teach boys and girls separately. The boys taught by men and the girls taught by women.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 have boys ever outperformed girls in the past? or is there no girls at school in the past?
I just think it's men who should adapt to this edu system.
SalaamAlaykum 1 year ago
@SalaamAlaykum I see from your profile that you live in Iraq. I don't know what the educational opportunities are for girls there, but in the UK girls have had access to education for a long time.
For decades feminists have been complaining that girls were disadvantaged by the educational system and campaigning to make it more girl friendly. Now it is boys who are disadvantaged by the educational system. The response to this is to say suck it up and adapt! Can't you see the double standard?
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 but the thing is...women and men are never equal. is there really a system that is truly fair, and makes girls and boys can compete on an equal basis? What I think is, it isn't the problem of the system. Girls beats boys at school is because they're more mature in their younger ages and fight hard at their academics. Meanwhile, boys especially the younger generation delay their maturity due to video games. If this continues, boys need to accept the reality of being beaten by girls
SalaamAlaykum 1 year ago
@SalaamAlaykum I do agree that girls of a particular age are more mature than boys of the same age. This is why I suggested that they should be educated separately in an earlier post. As others have also pointed out, the education system in the West, is very much biased towards promoting the interests of girls. I believe video games are a symptom of disaffection, and not the cause. They are not engaged by their schooling.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 yes I do agree boys seems not engaged by their schooling as boys like to go outdoor. but it's difficult to separate boys and girls in school. who should pay for the extra cost? and when should we combine girls and boys again? at university stage? And should we separate the public exam for the two gender? I am afraid that cause even more chaos. It is possible many girls who are academically superior will not enter the University they'd have entitled to.
SalaamAlaykum 1 year ago
@SalaamAlaykum I don't see that it would be difficult. Apart from the initial cost of reorganisation, why would it cost more on a sustained basis? I would keep them separate until university, to avoid hormonal distractions for both sexes. I would expect the final exams at school to be the same, so they are compared on a level playing field. Why do you assume that girls would be disadvantaged? I want both boys and girls to receive the best education possible!
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 if final exams are the same, the results are the same: boys being beaten. the fact is girls are better in academics(generally). and you won't ask girls to play a football match with boys as another exam right? the problem is you can't make boys really sit down for long hours to study for an exam! the problem in academics is you really need to sit down, study, memorizing, agree to whatevertheauthorthinks.
SalaamAlaykum 1 year ago
@SalaamAlaykum " if final exams are the same, the results are the same"No,the different approaches to educating boys and girls are intended to get them to reach the same destination by a different route!I hated sports at school because my PE teachers were sadists. It is still a way to expend excess energy.It is a means to an end,not an end in itself.Boys would obliterate girls in a football exam:) Boys can study when the conditions are right.The female centred system at the moment prevents this!
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Maybe it's the male-centred social system that prevents boys from doing well in school. Ever considered that before?
I never had a problem paying attention in school (except in long-winded math classes--and yeah, I'm a guy :P); but I was 'interested' in history/english/science. Instead of cars; I liked jet engines. Instead of action shows, I liked the history channel and (a few) books.
It's boredom that messes with education. And that's a personality trait.
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet I was able to pay attention in school too. You have to look at these issues as they affect boys and girls overall. The outliers don't represent the whole. I'm aware that there are cultural factors affecting boys performance in school, but these 'ride' on top of biological factors.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Hormones and biology don't directly influence the degree of intelligence or extensive knowledge that you can display. Girls and boys both can compete and excel in all fields. The main issue seems to be--not the culture within our schools (which are blatantly unbiased up until the point you get a biased teacher); but the culture leading 'up' to school (barbies on one side; soldiers on the other)
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet Biology most certainly does affect the degree of intelligence. The intelligence of boys tends to have a greater spread. There are both more boys at the upper AND lower levels of intelligence. Girls tend to cluster more around the mean. Hormones affect concentration levels, either in terms of high spirits or attraction to the opposite sex. I disagree that schools are 'blatantly unbiased'. Watch manwomanmyth's videos on education.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@jaieet My brother is a secondary school teacher. When he was a student, a group of them visited a primary school. The female students were allowed to be alone with the pupils, and had refreshments in the staffroom afterwards. The male students were NOT allowed to be alone with the pupils, and were REFUSED entry to the staffroom. They had to use another room. This apartheid reflects the view that all men are paedophiles and rapists. This anti-male perspective will prejudice the education of boys
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Not that this is really an 'issue'. =P As long as the person calling the shots is fit to do so, they should! There's no 'battle of the sexes' that we haven't invented in our own heads.
And just cause I have to say it; we really shouldn't just 'separate' the sexes in school. That could be disastrous later in life. That's the kind of thing that you'd really need to think through thoroughly before attempting (if current sex-specific schools are anything to go by)
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet Single sex schools tend to have better academic results. There is a conflict between the view that differences are innate versus cultural. Evolutionary psychology recognises that there are innate differences between the sexes. You appear to prefer the cultural explanation
I view men and women as complementary to each other. We tend to have the opposite strengths and weaknesses. I do believe in a 'level playing field' and equal rights, as there is a considerable degree of overlap however.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Indeed; you hit the cultural and personal VS academic education point right on the head; so I'll not go too much into that exploratory point've view (it's all trial and speculation right now anyways, far as I know :P).
Now;
The male VS female student example at primary school is NOT a representation of our/your country's form or forum of education on the whole. It has an incredible list of factors; ranging from community acts/crimes/victims/rumours or even teacher bias.
jaieet 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Biology IS a factor in hormonal interests; and it obviously makes boys more competitive (on average) than girls.
However, it does not--as far as I know--dictate our interests. That 'is' a cultural phenomenon. And differring social environments spawning different ideals/interests/hobbies is very solid evidence of exactly that.
Hobbies directly influence what you learn about; as well as how much you take in. Personality has a part in this; but.. no clue on how to definitively fix that
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet People tend to like doing what they are good at. I agree that environment influences our interests, but our innate capabilities are a bigger influence. Boys tend to be better at logical and visual-spatial tasks. Girls tend to be better at human relations and linguistic tasks. Boys tend to prefer the stem subjects whilst girls tend to prefer the humanities. Coincidence? I think not!
dalriada842 1 year ago
@jaieet Girls are hailed as multi-taskers, but the opposite of that is single-tasking which boys tend to do. The former is usually hailed as an unqualified advantage.
For many things it is useful, but not for all. Single-tasking allows intense focus on a problem. Boys tend to do this better, when they are interested in something. I believe this is why most inventors and researchers are men!
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 You can believe what ever you like. :P If women can (in mass) join the military and surpass their male counterparts; or join the research field and surpass their male counterparts, then obviously there's a gaping hole/inconsistency in that trail of though (and it's not like successful and/or educated women are rare, after all).
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet :) There is so much wrong with the underlying assumptions that you make here, that I could spend forever trying to disentangle them! You should go and watch manwomanmyth's series of videos on education and other issues. I suggest that you just watch them though, and refrain from commenting, as he has been known to tear feminists a new arsehole in the comments section!
Women surpass men in the military! This made me laugh! My brother was in the air-force before he retrained as a teacher.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 "There is so much wrong with the underlying assumptions that you make, that I am completely incapable of providing any counter argument here; so I won't. Go watch videos that should have provided me with some information I could use to generally negate your opinion." :P
Isn't it interesting the way you imply that when a woman succeeds, it's society's fault; but if she fails, men are awesome--even in male-dominated and shaped industries such as business? =P
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet You shouldn't use quotes when it isn't a quote of my words :P There's little point in me spending forever trying to explain things that are already better explained on this guy's channel. I've already watched all of his videos. We've also high-jacked the comments on this video.
I implied no such thing! You merely inferred that, incorrectly! I have no problem with women succeeding when it's merited.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 The air force? Are you implying that women can't fly planes? :P
I personally know a girl who came second in an interstate hand-to-hand combat session; and first in a marksmanship contest (only with rifles, though).
Even if you could objectively argue that the men went 'easy' on her in the h2h contest (at least one obviously did not :P), what's the excuse for rifle use?
Evidently, men are not inherently better.
Y'know if silly arguments like that didn't exist feminism wouldn't either
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet Flying is only a tiny part of the air-force. The main role of ALL the services is soldiering. Female athletes tend to perform at the level of 13.5 year old boys. This is why you don't see mixed sports. The physical training for female soldiers is much easier, and the men in their group have to carry some of their load. There is also unofficial pressure to pass women who have failed non-physical training courses, due to political pressure to increase the numbers of females.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Your 5% statistic is also almost definitively incorrect. Where you got it, I'll never know. :P But I would LIKE to. Could you please tell me?
No--a video doesn't count. =P
With that said; sport and physique are predominantly associated with the biological traits I admitted the existance of earlier (not like you can deny a fact).
It still does not denote the unemployment or education rates; nor the fact that women are just as likely to succeed as men.
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet The best 5% of women perform at the average for the men. Most are far below this. I used to have a humorous video on it but it's disappeared from my favourites:( I don't discount the odd Amazon though!
Many have trouble using military issue weapons because they either lack the strength, or their hands are too small to reach the trigger. Most can't throw grenades far enough to avoid blowing themselves up in the process! Twice as many women required to carry a stretcher as for men. etc.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Oh really? Interesting... So most females who have the qualifications to fight in combat cannot throw grenades properly or carry stretchers without having double the numbers as men... VERY interesting. Especially the part about you denying that you inferred a flying argument - the single coherent argument that is pro to your stance. :P
Don't believe me? Google up the G-force argument against women serving in fighter planes. I would suggest you keep that one on hand.
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet I never denied anything about a flying argument. There are a lot of factors that determine flying ability, including visual-spatial ability. Those facts come from a US military report. They changed their procedures as a result of general female feebleness. Women are essentially mascots in the military. Kept away from as much risk as possible, but paid the same as the men!
Had you watched the education videos on the channel I suggested, you would know how the changes occurred in the UK.
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Which military report?
Which changes to the school system?
=P
No video; I care not for unfactored impressionable and indemonstrable opinions. I would like some solid evidence. If you can provide a credible source, I'll know what to search for to find another. If you cannot, then the point is not moot or void; but I would heavily suggest learning some even-handedness. It only serves to irritate others if you play the victim all the time.
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet "It only serves to irritate others if you play the victim all the time." My education was a conservative one that largely pre-dates the current disaster. I'm not "playing the victim". I'm criticising a harmful change in our society.
Your unwillingness to make any effort doesn't inspire me to spoon-feed you with information. I suspect you of being a troll whose only interest is in spinning out a worthless conversation for as long as possible. This conversation is terminated!
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 Oh yeah? Well your unwillingness to provide any information doesn't inspire me to put in any effort. =P
You can 'suspect' whatever you like. I 'suspect' that's very closely related to why you may 'suspect' women control the most important aspects of our society (and, yet, cannot compete with men).
I would just like some relevant key terms; as well as the name of that military report, and even a single educational shift that was pro-fem.
If you can do that, your theory is plausible.
jaieet 1 year ago
@dalriada842 It is ironic that our society is formed specifically 'around' female equality--especially given the severely vocal opinion that feminism is wrong; and the girls simply aren't suited to certain industries (it is so easy to point at business, don'tcha think? =P).
Educate me; at what point in our recent history has our educational system switched to favour females? Up until recently, men outperformed them regularly.
According to your theory, there was a major shift.
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet LMFAO YAAAAAAAA RRRIIIIIIGGGGGHHHHTTTT
terriblefart 8 months ago
@dalriada842 If you want to go as far as saying 'most of ____ are men', then it's easy to point at the majority of school leavers being men; or the unemployment ratio being dominated by men.
In contrast, you can point at women--as a percentage--achieving degrees of higher learning (Uni/College) in greater amounts and more often cases than men are.
You could 'also' point at their recent trend of sliding into the business industry; a predominantly male-dominated area in the past.
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet I don't disagree with most of this. This is the essence of the debate! Women and girls are getting superior treatment in our society. In the case of the business industry, much of this is due to positive discrimination (AKA affirmative action). Of course this is an oxymoron, there is nothing positive about it. It is discrimination against men, particularly white men! Even straight white men!! That's me by the way:(
dalriada842 1 year ago
@dalriada842 In Australia and America particularly, women are outperforming men (as a percentage). This is not people skills. That's almost sexist. :P
Any rationale that men are 'better' is just as silly as any fanatic feminism ideals. Some things we do have an edge on due to our physical make; but, aside from small edges (which are easily compensated for), both sides are just as good as each other.
In fact; there is no 'side'. =P
jaieet 1 year ago
@jaieet I'm saying that men are better at some things, and women are better at other things. What is wrong with that? It is not just physical things! I make no claim that men are better overall! Men and women should be complementary to each other. Vive la difference!
dalriada842 1 year ago
@SalaamAlaykum It is true, generally, that boys are a little more 'fidgety' than girls when it comes to schoolwork. But boys are also generally more 'competitive' and 'ambitious' when it comes to schoolwork, as well.
Practical and/or physical tasks tend to appeal to the (general) male school population. They also appeal to most girls; but the difference in concentration in regards to these separate approaches is more notable in boys.
Definitely not feminised; but practical tasks wouldn't hurt.
jaieet 1 year ago
Whats funny is that western society can claim women are superior to men.
but if men like summers claim men are better then women at something its discrimination.
We all know what happened to summers, he got fired for speaking about this.
and the fact that during the recession 80% of jobs created during this time period went to women, but the western world ignores such things cause men are not important, only women are.
ManSpeakOut 1 year ago
@lewtube the majority of teachers have almost always been female dumbass, and school hasn't actually changed that much. School in itself is naturaly more feminine then it is masculine. Not saying girls are smarter, just that girls hormones makes then more equipped for education...sorry :)
missyah101 1 year ago
@missyah101 Don't you see it though
If men are better at something like summers says men are better at math, the western world pushes to close that gap, but if men lag behind in something we all just say its the way it is and lets it go
This is why men are lagging behind now in education because the magnifying glass is solely on women's side of the room
By making school more and more feminine friendly and not also making it masculine friendly, cause of this men are being ignored in education.
ManSpeakOut 1 year ago
@missyah101 Plus I heavily disagree that girls hormones make them more equipped for education.
Almost every single technological marvel was invented by the hands of men. Even the computer you used to type your comment on to this web page was made by men. The house you live in was built by men, the car you drive invented and built by men. Almost everything was invented by men, and saying they are not as capable of education and learning is miles off the mark.
ManSpeakOut 1 year ago
It really doesn't matter if women are subjected to grade inflation. The school system makes money off increasing tuitions and swelling student enrollmment. It has been shown to be easier to entice women to go to college. Employers, however, need qualified workers. Engineering and other scientific work is still the domain of men with less than 10% female participation. Why don't women even apply for thos jobs? The US should refocus on men for this.
feministsAreCorrupt 1 year ago
When Rushton and colleagues weighted each SAT question by an established general intelligence factor called the g-factor, they discovered that males surpassed females by an average of 3.6 IQ points.
XxFATfishxX 1 year ago
@XxFATfishxX Consider the changes to both the PSAT and SAT. The PSAT doubled the weight of verbal in its score while reducing the complexity of the math. The SAT also eliminated higher math. This inflates female scores. If women were indeed better at math, such modifications to standardized tests would not be necessary.
feministsAreCorrupt 1 year ago
Very few in the younger generations in the U.S. have strong verbal/grammar skills. The causes are teachers today themselves have poor verbal/grammar skills-they can't teach what they themselves don't know, and the media. The verbal errors that I hear many people making are "this is the most unique... The other is fewer/less. There are no degrees of unique. Something is either unique (one of a kind) or it is not. Use fewer with discrete items (like pencils) and less with items you can't count.
cheriem432 1 year ago
Very few in the younger generations in the U.S. have strong verbal/grammar skills. The causes are teachers today themselves have poor verbal/grammar skills-they can't teach what they themselves don't know, and the media. The verbal errors that I hear many people making are "this is the most unique... The other is fewer/less. There are no degrees of unique. Something is either unique (one of a kind) or it is not. Use fewer with discrete items (like pencils) and less with items you can't coount.
cheriem432 1 year ago
Very few in the younger generations in the U.S. have strong verbal/grammar skills. The causes are teachers today themselves have poor verbal/grammar skills-they can't teach what they themselves don't know, and the media. The verbal error that I hear many people making are "this is the most unique... There are no degrees of unique. Something is either unique (one of a kind) or it is not.
cheriem432 1 year ago
oh good their closing the gap...by making girls more competent and educated? think again: that gap is being closed primarily because of the neglect of the boys' educational needs, and the disparate amnt of resouces denied them in favor of catering to the females. these people would rather everyone be equally SCREWED than admit any natural difference between the sexes, and their doing a damn fine job of it. the US is down DOZENS of rankings in education compared to other countries since 1950.
knowthingman 1 year ago
men > women
dardraa 1 year ago
These are evil women trying to explain away their own insecurities by putting forward all women. Only a dishonest person would equalize women to men in technical and mathematical fields. I have MSc degrees in both - most women are able to learn by hart and believe they understand what they learned but very rarely actually understand and make progress. In the current educational system boys are suppressed so girls excel, so boys give up as they naturally dislike playing with dolls. 9/11 truth.
PeaceAndGloryMB 1 year ago
ok first i like to state that it is only fair to ask boys as a share of a girls vs boys vid as both sides want to be better or at least think there better. GOD created all men and woman equal so i think that as we all have different aturbites we should not have to dissuss it and asking a girl " do you think girls are better then boys" in anything or vis versa is just bias, pride, and seist.
flybirdefly 1 year ago
i hate when i see all 140 character replies in the comments...so unwelcoming
luckynumber58 1 year ago
By the way, I agree that both genders are smart, but girls tend to score better in academic evaluates.
Maybe because they aren't too busy thinking of pussy all the time (nothing wrong with that), or playing poker at night to achieve some male fantasies
mtavares92 1 year ago
at basic math level skills, girls and boys are pretty close to equal (like 10 or 20 point difference in average SAT), but at high-level competitive mathematics, there is an overwhelming dominance of males. among the top scorers of the usa math olympiad, there's usually only 1 girl for every 40 or so guys.
arrangement 1 year ago
yes,edu system may favor girls,but think about previous ages, he farming system favors men and that's why men rules.and why the society need more schools? because we need to inHERit our civilization, knowledge.Those blaming the edu system failing boys are fundamentally same as feminist who blame farming favors men!
as we step into a knowledge, mechanical age, we need an edu system.I predict women are leaders from now on.As a boy who is taught to behave by female teachers,i'm happy women rules!
SalaamAlaykum 1 year ago
Comment removed
Glimppe 1 year ago
@SalaamAlaykum
@SalaamAlaykum
Why is it wrong to blame education system for failing boys if that's reality? Because that would be politically incorrect? People used to blame edu-system for failing girls and measures were taken to help girls out, now when boys are falling behind it is because girls are smarter not because system is failing boys?
Glimppe 1 year ago
@Glimppe Agreed.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
Comment removed
SalaamAlaykum 1 year ago
women,just shut up because you just give girls more courege than boys.
undertaker11ism 1 year ago
schools should be split by gender so both genders have the teaching methods,materials,etc to suceed
4marchbaby12 1 year ago
The reason for the closing of the gender academic gap is the fact schools are failing boys. I'll bet a million bucks those "other countries" they are talking about are other western countries where feminism has ruined the society. School curriculums have become more girl-biased and are almost exclusively taught BY WOMEN. Things which boys respond to (competition and leadership) has been replaced with things girls respond to (Methodical work and attentiveness).
This is sexism.
Rhonda9000 1 year ago
If females were 'not equal' in the past because of nurture based syndromes and profound and simple discriminations, then how come those same nurture phenom could not be responsible now for whatever gender data?
It is obvious that the west has many [_unconstitutional_] female-only policies and an anti male tenor. That is not relevant to why males as a group are falling behind?
Fascinating "science".
SeanMacCloud 1 year ago
What these good ladies here haven't seemed to have noted is that the pre-university school system is now highly feminized. Some 80% of secondary school teachers are women. But boys need masculine role models in order to repond well and remain motivated. Boys will grow to be men. So they need male role models they can emulate. This is not to diminish the achievements of girls, but far too many boys with great potential are now failing. This will skew success rates in favour of girls.
lewtube 1 year ago 15
funny in Britain boy have overtaken women in Maths by going back to a final exam system instead of coursework.
loroanno 1 year ago
they should have had a male and a female research it- not two women- hehe... they may have gotten the stats wrong. okay just a joke ;) I'm sure there are tons of women better at math than myself
DexterBoyGenius33 1 year ago
@DexterBoyGenius33 Maybe you are not so wrong. Those with pro female agendas when it comes to comparing or including males are routinely biased, slanted, and rationalizing away conclusions to fit their agenda. BTW, women outright lie? Of course not. Never (eyes rolling here).
freeheretic111 1 year ago
I FUCKJING HATE YOUTUBE!!!!
Why can't I write a full nice text with more than 500 characters ?? stupid shity website
Who the fuck gets any fun spamming these text boxes anyway
fucking losers
mtavares92 1 year ago
No doubt. There are a few women that do very well in math. The real question is who cares? The US is spending a lot of time, money and effort to bring women up in math without spending the same to bring men up in verbal. Many claims are made that the US will be more competitive with more women in technical fields and in college, but we are seeing that both foreign men and women (Japan/TaiwanKorea and Germany/France) are exceeding US men.
The US should be spending more money on boys.
sting444 1 year ago 26
@sting444 Groups like the American Association of University Women will never allow it. They launch vicious lobbying campaigns against any legislation that is aimed at helping males in education. They are the hate mongers of the new century!
Runz32 1 year ago
@Runz32 yeah, and there's also this mentality that the boys in the class will be just fine because they're just boys. Not ALL guys are better in math, and not ALL girls are better at verbal. If a person (regardless of gender) is struggling, that person should be able to get help from their instructor. Too bad teachers aren't willing to pull kids aside at younger (and shyer) ages and help them to succeed. Oh well.
SoggyPizzaPockets1 1 year ago
@Runz32 True. That is one very aggressive misandry organization. A boys entire educational experience is now very negative and anti-male so it is not surprising that boys are tuning out schooling.
freeheretic111 1 year ago
@sting444
actually a study within the America's in 2008 has proven that statement wrong. Women are as proficient in math as men nowadays. Likewise with men and language arts. I myself am doing college algebra in 7th grade along with my peers in the incredibly gifted STEM class. The ratio of girls and boys in my class has, as a matter of fact, more girls. But only by 4 more people. And we all, girls and boys, excel in Science(S), Technology(T), Engineering(E), and Math(M).
KaroandEk 1 year ago
@sting444 The US should be spending more money on the US lol. period
koviack 1 year ago
It was men who started and ended wars it was men who invented religion to manipulate people and enslave certain minority groups including women. It is men who beat the shit out of their children and their wives. It is men who rape, it is men who comit paedophilia, it is men who decide to cut their oxygen supply while jacking off; It is men who fuck corpses (necrophilia), it is men who do all kinds of gross things and still have the nerves to fill themselves with an un-deserving pride..
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 You that is very true. The funny this is, I'm a nice guy and yet I never get the girl. Women always claim men are worthless, but it's because they always look at the bad men, men who are badasses; the men women like. And when they do get beaten, raped, etc. they think all men are like that because they never tried the nice smart guy because he was a loser, sitting at lunch by himself.
DeadGamePits4Life 1 year ago
you know, thats a common misconception of what reality truly is.
Women do fall in love with the nice guy, and there is a difference between dating a jock just for the hell of it and having a real commited relationship.
Women don't look only at "bad men". They look at men who have confidence. Self-confidence attracts women, charismatic men attracts women. It just happens to be that some of those jock assholes eventually beat the shit out of their partners for some reason
mtavares92 1 year ago
True, but statistics prove that women, more often that not when choosing the jock, happen to choose the jock assholes that beat them? Why, because they dated without really knowing them.
pokos33 1 year ago
maybe women don't date you because you never actually talk to them ?
obviously, if someone sits alone in a bench at lunch all by himself, that person can either be a psycopath serial killer or the nicest, sweeatest guy on Earth, no one will ever give you the oportunity to settle and have a talk if you dont come to them first
Women date all sorts of men.. because there are also all sorts of women ! and even a girl who is "on the other side" can date a nerd
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 SEXIST BICH we men are not fucked up retards
U WHORE
turbokayaker 1 year ago
@mtavares92 Seriously? You believe religion was invented for manipulation and enslavement only? Religion can often keep people in line, like if you're a strong believer in Christianity. Religion gives people hope, religion gives people strength, and religion can give people a set of rules that make our world heck of a lot better than it could be. Also, women CAN be as cruel as a man, women CAN do disgusting things, and women can also decide to masturbate. See? Women can do anything a man can do
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx Yeah. We know they CAN be as cruel as men. But the vast majority ISN'T because they are not as vile as men.
And if you pay real attention, you'll see religion always brings more harm than good.
Besides... all the hope you'll ever get with religion is the Ilussion of happiness and security, and a life after death. And if you ask me, I'd rather know the truth then pray to a void of nothing.
Being happy with false hopes and lies is just as wrong as a friendship with dishonesty
mtavares92 1 year ago
Comment removed
Qyarx 1 year ago
@mtavares92 You know what's vile? Prostitution. And who does most of that? I think you know the answer. And women sell themselves not because men want it, it's purely for $ . Also, go ahead and know the "truth", but what I know is that people who see this illusion of happiness and security, tend to have MUCH happier lives than those that don't. So really, this "illusion" you speak of, makes people live good lives, so at the end of the road, it won't even matter if life after death even exists.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx So you blame women for chosing a career that brings them money, when the only thing they have to do is fuck.
That sounds.. pretty easy don't you think.
And actually, it's a win-win scenario. The man improves his self-esteem and ejects his weekly sperm payload delivery and the woman gets out with a quick buck.
What's so wrong in the end?
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 I'm sorry, I missed the part where prostitution was a good thing. And whats so wrong? Last time I checked, prostitution was illegal, and guess what? It still is.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx By the way.. when you said. "And who does most of that?"
Trust me, there are A LOT more men willing to fuck for a buck than women. That doesn't mean they sell their "services" for sexual purposes thought more than women.
You might want to take that into consideration before opening your mouth.
Not by any chance that 90 % of the porno industry is directly aimed at MEN. While it's the "bitches" of women who are evil, and impure that run that business.
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 Okay then, one more thing. Try going to Miami at night and just take a stroll down the streets, and we'll see how many women ask you if you're looking for a good time, if you are a guy at least. And, women don't usually pay those men who are willing to "f*#k for a buck" that you speak of, because it's usually women who have more success flaunting their bodies. And still, the porno industry wouldn't exist, if there weren't women willing to blatantly expose themselves for money.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx Wrong again.
The porno industry wouldnt exist if men weren't so hungry to subscrive to those new pics and put the piener in hand and start workin on it
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 And, I can't help but notice that you're extremely sexist. I don't know about you, but sexism is stupid no matter what gender you are. I don't believe that women are superior, nor do I believe that men are superior as well. However, it does tick me off when people are extremely ignorant in seeing how many insanely nice people there are for both genders.I'd even protect women if some douche was being sexist against them, and you mtavares are no different.Quit being such a sexist geez.
Qyarx 1 year ago
Lol...
You're definetly mentally retarded or just plain fucking stupid.
You sir, don't belive women are as equal as men no matter how hard you try to fool yourself. That's why you can't even stand the word "fuck", and believe that prostitution is a sin. Unconsciently (and directly), you blame women for it and you consider whores to be souless harpies.
Well guess what, their human. As human as you and me. AND IT'S JUST A "FUCKING" JOB.
You FUCK and you get PAID. WHAT'S WRONG?
mtavares92 1 year ago
@Qyarx Really man. tell me once and for all what's the great TABOO EVIL SIN that binds the thing that allowed us to spawn 7 BILLION people.
Do people suddenly climb out of holes?
..
NO !!
THEY .. FUCK ! It's the PENIS and the VAGINA. Those are NOT SINFULL WORDS.
This is not a subject grown adults should be so fearfull about.
This is something natural, and acceptable and NORMAL!
Its normal to have sexual urges and impulses, so I really dont see any harm in prostitution!!
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 lol, you can try to tell me what I think about gender equality, but it still doesn't change the fact that I think men and women are EQUAL. Never in my life, am I going to think it's ok just to have sex with a random person for money, and you know why? It's not even my Christian values that tell me it's wrong, it's the fact that whores want to sell themselves to a person they don't even know. Are they only worth the money they're being paid?
Qyarx 1 year ago
@mtavares92 The fact that I dislike prostitutes because they don't treat themselves like a human being, is completely rational. Being a whore, is like being a toy to someone else.You play with it, then throw it away.These women deserve to be treated like people, not just toys for pleasure.Also, penis and vagina are hardly sinful words dumbass.And I don't swear b/c I'm not a dirty mouthed idiot.There's people who have happy families, I can't say you'll be part of one with your sexist attitude,
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx No one throws away whores lol ^^
It's mearely a service.
Tell me. If you truly have no bad feelings regarding the act of sex, what exactly is your problem?
selling is legal. fucking is legal. why isnt selling fucking legal?
Having a relationship should involve love, and commited, respect etc.
But this isn't a relationship. It's the satisfaction of a primitive and basic drive. It's a simple deal between two persons.
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 lol, it was just an expression, but anyway, the whole point of sex is to try to produce a child, correct? Then why share this action with someone you're not going to raise a baby with? Sex, in my opinion, is misused a lot, and put in lots of movies, and then teens everywhere just want to screw each other and wish they didn't.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx Well it has been proved scientifically that the human species, along with some others, remains one of the few who practises regular sex.
It is written in our DNA the primal drive to reproduce, despite both parties knowing that many of those intercourses will not result in a child.
Again, your responses and contradictory.
You say you have no objections against the act of sex, but you believe paying for it is repugnant.
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 No, I believe paying for sex with a random person that you're likely never going to see again, is repugnant.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx Well you know what, I believe it is something only to be used by "desperate men".
Lonely men. i dunno. 38 year old virgins. Personnaly, I dont think I would ever visit a strip club or go to a ho club. That because I believe love is an essencial element in having sex.
Also, in a strip club I think i would feel sorry for those women. Not because they are flashing their titties, but because ignorant dumb men are objectifying while they are there trying to pay the rent.
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 And finally, EVERYTHING you said in that comment, I agree with 100%. Especially the stuff about the strip club lol.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@mtavares92 lol, it was just an expression as in you just hump em and dump em, but anyway, the whole point of sex is to try to produce a child, correct? Then why share this action with someone you're not going to raise a baby with? Sex, in my opinion, is misused a lot, and put in lots of movies, and then teens everywhere just want to screw each other and wish they didn't.
Qyarx 1 year ago
Think of it this way:
You believe that god created our species and the universe along with all the things that are in it right?
So, given that god is omnipotent and omniscient, he must have known eventually we would be fucking for no reason, just for pleasure. And that mean's that is part of god's ALLMIGHTY design, because "everything happens according god's will".
So no worries my friend. if god allowed us to spawn to make prostituion available that means he aproves it :)
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 lol, I guess you're right there, which I hate to admit. Makes me wonder what the heck is going on in God's head...
Qyarx 1 year ago
See it this way.
Your saying that a woman shouldnt sell herself to another person.
Well first lets clear one point:: Whores don't sell themselves. That would be slavery, something you as a good christian should know about, which clearly is not the case.
The man who pays does not own the woman at any times, not even during the act of sex. ...
Because all it is is an act of sex. Nothing more
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 Ok then, women shouldn't "rent" themselves to another person lol, but still, the act of sex is something personal, and should be treated with respect and responsibility.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx With that point, I agree.
It should be treated with respect and responsibility. Psychologically forcing your girlfriend to get you laid is not something a man should do. That is immature and stupid.
But just fucking is just making your penis a bit happier.
I believe you hold some missplaced prejudice against that, that you don't fully understand but still can't shake the idea that this is somewhat a wrong thing.
I get it, and I don't blame ya. But try making it simpler to see
mtavares92 1 year ago
This is why I think your ultimate prejudice involves the act of sex, but since you have absolutly no problem with that as you made clear in your responses, then all prostituon is is a service.
A service where one party gets what he wants, and the other is paid in return.
Pure simple business.
Now, if you have some weird supersticion consisting of two people having to actually know eachother in order to first fuck now that's another story..
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 Well, yes, that's my superstition, I mean, at LEAST go on a date, and get to know each other better, maybe then it would be a bit ok to have sex afterwards. I'm not saying at all, that sex should be restricted before marriage, contrary to Christian values, because it's a completely natural process that can happen between lovers and can hardly be stopped. Also, I really, don't like the idea of sex being a business, it has a purpose, and it's to bring a daughter or son into this world.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx many purposes are just about the dumbest abstract shit invented by humankind.
If you add a purpose to a child's life, then you can say that an unborn human baby's life is either worthless or the most beautifull thing in the world.
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 Hmm, I did say the purpose of SEX was to produce a child, but still, an unborn baby has the potential to do anything, and if you raise him/her correctly, he/she won't end up being a prick.
Qyarx 1 year ago
@Qyarx That was not my point. I meant that pro-choice supporers tend to say that a fetus has the "potential of life".
While I agree that is pure bullshit, what I meant was that purposes shouldn't completly define something, all the time.
mtavares92 1 year ago
@mtavares92 But, a fetus does have the potential of life, doesn't it? I mean, it has the potential to live a life outside of it's mom, but anyway, I agree that not everything's purpose is to be followed. Take rock-climbing for example, the whole purpose was to overcome and scale a mountain or wall, but now it's also a sport that's fun!
Qyarx 1 year ago