Added: 1 year ago
From: LoudStudios
Views: 221,062
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4,451)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • watch?v=EADtWCh30Bg&feature=re­lated

  • @liabilitymate It's funny that you're linking to Ben Lowrey, because his experiences are proof that freeman crap doesn't work. He has violated statutes in the past, and the police immediately arrested him. He kept repeating that he didn't consent, but the police didn't care and arrested him anyway. And nobody lifted a finger to stop them or punish them after the fact, in direct contradiction to the law according to freemen.

  • O the misunderstanding of the laws of the land. Freeman are wrong. Their interpretation of the Constitutional Act 1867 - 1982 is wrong. You don't wish to abide by the laws of the land, then leave.

  • Know your rights. Fantastic. Well done.

    Not going to court would alloow them to rule whatever they want to rule.

  • @theawesomebeliever YES WELL DONE.... GREAT JOB LOSING IN COURT GETTING FINED AND LOSING HIS LICENSE.

  • @greywolf424 Guess what my friend.

    You don't need a fucking licence.

    But you don't believe me do you? answer this?

    Can you tell me what license means?

    Is Keith a public servant or a govt trustee?

    Is the (judge) a public servant?

    Has Keith harmed anyone?

    Can you startpage or google CONSENT + CONTRACT?

  • @liabilitymate "Can you tell me what license means?"

    .

    ALREADY GIVEN YOU THE COMMON LAW DEFINITION 5 TIMES COCK SUCKER....

    .

  • @greywolf424 well he would lose it anyway.

  • @theawesomebeliever no need to go to a statute court it is only for public servants and consenting FOOLS.

    Any cooperation with these private corporate courts is seen as accepting their terms of contract, forget it what has their bullshit corporate court got to do with the general public without consent?

    Answer - NOTHING. they have no authority over you. so DON'T CONSENT.

    Its a SCAM.

    Startpage - CONSENT and CONTRACT.

  • @liabilitymate AND THE BOTTOM LINE IS NO MATTER HOW MUCH PISSING AND MOANING AND FUCKING LYING YOU DO HERE.... KEITH LOST THE CASE, WAS FINED AND LOST HIS LICENSE. SINCE KEITH LIVES IN A SMALL TOWN WHERE THE POLICE KNOW HIM IF HE TRIES DRIVING WITHOUT HIS LICENSE HE GOES STRAIGHT TO JAIL.

  • @greywolf424 You can not represent yourself in court, that is bad grammar. You can only PRESENT yourself, In fact you cannot represent yourself in anything you can only re-present something else. ie, PERSON. words are tricky...

    Freeman on the land is a self ordained title (invented by the barons) if your are en-titled (receive benefit from title) then you have obligation, so the creator gave us the title man so the only obligation for using that title is to the creator. Take a hike.

  • @liabilitymate This is what happens when you try to understand the English language if you don't believe in etymology. Or dictionaries. Or general usage.

    Nope, let's just look at the words and make figure out puns out of them.

    Words, how the **** do they work?

  • @greywolf424 Well King Charles believed the same when Cromwell personally signed his execution.

    Gandhi attended all court cases against him and yet he managed to beat the english out on their own game.

    However interesting suggestion I might consider them, and I understand you, it does makes sense.

  • I think the courts ought to start indulging these fools in their maritime fantasies, and make them walk the plank when they're found guilty.

  • Blacks online dictionary is fun stuff when watching these videos... The judge wants Keith to agree(form a contract) to be the "agent".

    From my brief check online you don't want to agree to be the agent cause then he will start sticking it to you legally.

  • My pussy is incredibly wet. Banana nipples.

  • hahahahahaahahah did a notice show up to your house saying you had to pay/???

  • @ebayisajoke <==== HE LOST THE CASE, GOT FINED AND LOST HIS LICENSE.... FROM YOU'RE PROFILE YOU ARE CLEARLY A SCAM ARTIST WHO IS CRYING BECAUSE YOU GOT KICKED OFF OF EBAY.

  • @greywolf424 their was no case and he does not need a licence.

    You can conduct normal activities without one, (Licence) but if you don't want the pigs to bother you make your own, send a Proposal of Contract with your Secretary of State or your Minister of Transport. These are non-negotiable, and for any issues he is held culpable unless you actually commit a crime of some sort. Record your license instead of Registering it.

  • @liabilitymate "their was no case and he does not need a licence."

    .

    THERE WAS A CASE, WHICH KEITH LOST AND YOU DO NEED A LICENSE..... POST SOME MORE LIES AND BULLSHIT LOSER.... IT IS FUN HUMILIATING YOU.

    .

  • @liabilitymate OH AND LET'S NOT FORGET THE BEST PART, ANYONE WHO FOLLOWS YOUR BULLSHIT ADVICE AND ENDS UP IN COURT CAN SUE YOU FOR ALL OF THEIR LEGAL EXPENSES AND DAMAGES.

  • @greywolf424 well, i'd say that it's best to avoid going to court ever, by going to court, you are contracting with the crooks right off the bat.

    Offer solutions via letters, which seals the deal by stating that they have no authority over you, without having to go into court!

    Is a Judge a public servant? bet your shiny butt they are!

    They have no jurisdiction over anyone without consent except for trustees and public servants.

  • @liabilitymate "by going to court, you are contracting with the crooks right off the bat."

    .

    PROVEN BULLSHIT..... NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU REPEAT THIS LIE IT REMAINS A LIE.

    .

    "They have no jurisdiction over anyone without consent except for trustees and public servants."

    .

    ANOTHER FUCKING LIE

  • Wonderful. I don't understand it. But I have seen the so called "justice" system at work, up close and personal. I am never going to let them get away with their bull shit again. My rules next time, if there is ever a next time. Peace

  • Fuck that "judge"

    Great job!

  • Good on you "keith" (Kate) im Myddrin's Daughter xxx

  • @greywolf424 I can write an act and state your a fucking idiot and if you consent which I gather you would then you are a fucking idiot and I can do whatever I want with your sorry ass, cause you obviously are a fucking idiot because you consented to being fucking idiot. Your LEGAL Act crap, I love it when they have got the serious bullshit glasses on they state (THE ACT) that along with codes,statutes BULLSHIT. The blind mind game is all over fool you just don't know it.

  • @liabilitymate""I can write an act"

    .

    NO ACTUALLY YOU CAN'T... AND ONLY ONE POSTING BULLSHIT IS YOU..... AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT.

  • Comment removed

  • Why would the government need to "trick" anyone into consenting? I mean, if they're willing to use lies and deceit, I don't understand why they wouldn't be willing to just use force in every situation. Considering the fact that apparently all police and judges are in on the conspiracy, I can't imagine the negative consequences for them.

  • @MidnightWins2 You bring up a good point, but as usual, it's just going to go right over their heads.

  • So wait... he lost the case and his license? Why the hell would he post this? Some other witless yokel may try the same shit and get in trouble also. Not cool.

  • @AJS0121 the ones that actually get it - let me in on the little secret, this video shows how the wool has been pulled over the sheeples eyes.

    Guess what my friend.

    You don't need a fucking licence.

    But you don't believe me do you? answer this?

    Can you tell me what license means?

    Is Keith a public servant or a govt trustee?

    Is the (judge) a public servant?

    Has Keith harmed anyone?

    Can you startpage or google CONSENT + CONTRACT?

  • @AJS0121 he didnt lose, the captain abandoned ship, the case was dismissed

  • @xcvsdxvsx Only in Keith's mind. In the real world, court reconvened later, and another hearing was scheduled later in the month. He didn't show up and was fined $260.

    Google "guelph mercury keith thompson"

  • @xcvsdxvsx YES KEITH DID LOSE, IT IS A WELL DOCUMENTED FACT... THERE ARE A COUPLE PATHOLOGICAL LIARS HOWEVER WHO LIKE TO TROLL HERE AND LIE TO PEOPLE.

  • @greywolf424 if you and i are playing a game of chess and suddenly i dont like the way the game is going, so i pick the board up and fling it across the room does that mean you lost?

  • @xcvsdxvsx You can come up with any analogy or metaphor you want to. The reality is that court reconvened later. The case was not, in observable fact, dismissed.

  • @AJS0121 YES HE DID LOSE..... JUST LIKE THESE "FREEMEN" ALWAYS LOSE.

  • @greywolf424 Your info ha, ha.

    Free men and women are winners all over the world as statutes et al are ghost laws, nobody to fight? They don't don't exist without trickery too consent.

    I can write an act and state your a fucking idiot and if you consent which we gather without doubt you would then you are a fucking idiot and I can do whatever I want with your sorry ass, cause you obviously are a fucking idiot because you consented to being fucking idiot.

  • @liabilitymate "Free men and women are winners all over the world as statutes et al are ghost laws, nobody to fight? They don't don't exist without trickery too consent.

    .

    MORE BULLSHIT

  • @liabilitymate ONLY FUCKING IDIOT HERE IS YOU, AND YOU PROVE EVERY TIME YOU POST

  • @greywolf424 lol, its true. They never document there failures. 

  • @1madaboutguitar How convenient.

    But then, how can anyone proclaim with any authority that there have beeen "thousand of Freeman successes", or even one, if not a single one of them is documented?

    What it really says is that you are exceedingly easily persuaded.

  • Comment removed

  • @1madaboutguitar Welcome to the internet!

    If you want to have a private conversation, I invite you to use the "private message" feature. Most websites have such a feature.

    This being said, I'm pretty sure I got the context. If not then who are this "they", who never document "there" failures? I would truly be shocked if you weren't invoking a vast coverup conspiracy by the powers that be to hide the "truth" of Freeman evangelism.

  • @dbnkr2011 Ha Ha, you're still talking shit. Goodbye.

  • @1madaboutguitar Awww I guess we'll never know what you think you were talking about. Oh well. No big loss I suppose.

  • @dbnkr2011 Bye Imbecile.

  • @1madaboutguitar Seriously I don't think you understand how the internet works.

  • That was cool.

  • Comment removed

  • Hell yes!!! What was the outcome of this movement?

  • @TacticalWarMachine KEITH WAS FINED AND LOST HIS LICENSE.

  • @greywolf424 You tell @applemanjohn to learn to read, but there's no s in the word licence.

  • @raynarks Pointing out a typo or spelling error is always such a compelling argument.

    Especially when the alleged typo is in fact a perfectly legitimate spelling. Both spellings are acceptable. Look it up.

    Fail.

  • @dbnkr2011 maybe in American but not in English & it's not a typo it's a spelling mistake: at least in England it is. Licence does not have an S, licensing does, but the S replaces the seccond C not the first C. Anyway the point of my post was that someone told someone else to learn to read & then put a misspelling ; I was being ironic, but if your American you wont know what that is.

  • @raynarks OOOOOOH YOU FOUND A NONEXISTENT SPELLING ERROR.... YOU MUST BE SO PROUD..... FUCKING IDIOT.

  • @raynarks TRY AGAIN FUCKTARD..... The noun license (American English) or licence (Indian English, British English, Canadian English, Australian English)

  • @raynarks The only thing ironic here is you saying you're being ironic. What you actually mean is that it is paradoxal. For example, when someone writes "seccond" when complaining about typos. Or, in admonishing someone for telling others to "learn to read", he misreads "license" as "lisence".

    While reading the dictionary to find out what irony actually means, look up "license" and observe that no, it really is an acceptable spelling and save yourself from further embarrassment.

  • @applemanjohn TRUTH BEING FUCKING IDIOTS LIKE YOU LOSE ALL THE TIME, HOWEVER THAT RADIO STATION CAN BE SUED FOR GIVING LEGAL ADVICE THAT IT IS NO QUALIFIED TO GIVE.

  • @applemanjohn IT IS ILLEGAL FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO GIVE LEGAL ADVICE .... ANYONE FOLLOWING SAID ADVICE WHO SUFFERS DAMAGES CAN SUE THE PERSON WHO GAVE THEM THAT ADVICE.

  • @applemanjohn AND BY THE WAY.... PEOPLE LIKE YOU HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED AS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS BY THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.... AND BY IT'S VERY DEFINITION ARE GUILTY OF TREASON.

  • @greywolf424 The American Governmnet hasn't held office since 1871. We don't consent to the US CORPORATION and their terrorism.

  • @ltajambi YOU'RE FULL OF SHIT..... AND NO ONE IS BUYING YOUR FUCKING LIES....

  • @ltajambi I couldn't have said it any better myself. Thanks

  • @greywolf424 OOOOOh I'm scared. There is no American government or at least the one you think you have. Go back to sleep.

  • @applemanjohn THERE IS IN FACT AN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT..... WHICH IS WHY UNEDUCATED FUCKTARDS LIKE YOU, LOSE EVERY SINGLE TIME.

  • @applemanjohn Personally I am looking forward to the day when traitors like you are lined up and shot. 

  • @SnapDragon2012 You will. You really want to shoot me? Maybe you need to look in the mirror for the traitor and You might want to think twice before you make public death threats.

  • @applemanjohn HE NEVER SAID HE WANTED TO SHOOT YOU...... LEARN TO READ FUCKTARD.

  • @greywolf424 I'm sorry. I just cannot waste any more time on low life NWO garbage like you and your boyfriend crapdragon or whatever his name is. Enjoy your tyranny.

  • @greywolf424 Im bored.

    Can you answer me this.

    Is Keith a public servant or a govt trustee?

    Is the (judge) a public servant?

    Do you work in a circus with makeup on?

    And do you have the hots for Keith?

  • @liabilitymate YOUR QUESTIONS ARE AS MEANINGLESS AS THE REST OF YOUR BULLSHIT AND PROVEN LIES...... THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS IS THAT KEITH LOST THE CASE AND NOT ONLY WAS FINED BUT LOST HIS LICENSE. 

  • I know this guy in person, he was a good friend until he started making advances on me (I'm a guy LOL) im pretty sure after he became a phaggot it started messing with his lololol

    I know for a FACT that he gave the judge a blow job. I think Freeman is a faggot cult LOLOLOL PHAGGOTS!!

    Live. Love. Laugh. Copyright 2012. Of the op is a faggot clan.

  • @mstargeted2012 what crimes? What are you talking about? Listen - foryour own safety do remember couple of things:

    a) Keith - lost this case in the end

    b) FBI doers recognize these people as domestic terrorists

    c) Each country pays taxes. (Also - point me where in the US budget do these money go towards English queen as sovereigns believe).

    d) It's all not going to matter as world is running out of ffing oil and soon all this not gonna matter.

  • Awesome!

  • That was great. Very Well done

  • @WilAzzamEdison YES AWESOME JOB LOSING IN COURT

  • @greywolf424 :)

  • what does he hand over at 1:10 ?

  • No...the man playing the role of the "Judge" is not the administrator of the court. He is simply a public trustee. If you are the administrator than that's it...there cannot be two. You gave life to the fiction therefore you own it. You are the sole Beneficiary, Executor, and Administrator. Nothing happened here at all. Just avoid their stupid play altogether in the future...it's all a fiction and has nothing to do with you as a Man. Going there means you still think they have authority.

  • @BlossomAndBlood Keith didn't go when court reconvened later. He was still fined and lost his license.

    Although I would agree that not showing up is a lot more productive for everyone involved than the stupid, pointless gesticulation demonstrated in this video.

  • @dbnkr2011 is Keith a public servant? or a trustee?

  • @BlossomAndBlood FUCKING IDIOT.... YOUR BULLSHIT BABBLING IS FOOLING NO ONE.

  • @greywolf424 Very well thought out and intelligent comment...thank you.

  • @BlossomAndBlood REALLY THINK YOUR LITTLE BULLSHIT SOCK PUPPET SHILL ACCOUNT YOU JUST OPENED TWO DAYS AGO IS FOOLING ANYONE?..... THINK AGAIN.

  • @greywolf424 You've got me greywolf...I can't argue with that logic.

  • @BlossomAndBlood MAN THAT VIDEO YOU UP LOADED WAS HILARIOUS.... YOU ADMIT YOU BROKE THE LAW YET YOU WHINE AND CRY AND MAKE UP ALL KINDS OF BULLSHIT ABOUT HOW YOU ARE ABOVE THE LAW...... GREAT COMEDY, HOPEFULLY NEXT TIME YOU SPEND A GOOD LONG TIME IN PRISON.... FUCKING LOSER.

  • It's silly for the legal system to be based on this childish word game. Just leave people alone if no one gets hurt or gets something stolen/vandalized.

  • @mg03nma It's not.

  • I would just love for at least one of the idiots post a video of a so called soverign winning a court decision instead of arguing with a judge and sounding stupid over their name. I know this is Canada, but all of the so called soverigns in Canada just post vidoes of them charging the police with 1 billion dollars, and CLAIMING they won a court decision. Until these tards post a video of them winning in court, they are an epic fail.

  • oh my god this is amazing u can do this

  • He didn't abandon ship ( he's not a captain ) he didn't abandon the court room he called for a recess which means a break. The guy was pulling shit on the judge and being disrespectful. So the judge called for recess. All the judge was asking was for him to verify if he was the person on the complaint. The answer is yes. He didn't win because he has no grounds to stand on.

  • @pinghead105 No you have it completely wrong. Firstly a 'person' is a legal fiction. Your birth certificate is your person YOU are either a Man or a Woman. Secondly, the Judge did abandon the court, because he failed to state a time frame for the recess. Thirdly, that MAN won, because he, as a sovereign being is subject ONLY to common law, admiralty law does not apply. You've been brainwashed and tricked. You should research this to verify for yourself.

  • @w0y1z92753 Who issues your birth certificate? The state had laws and procedures. Show me where the Judge has to state how long a recess is and why it makes any difference. If he parked his car on his property and they ticked it he should have challenged that law not whether he was sovereign citizens. Has nothing to do with being brainwashed ( which doesn't exist ) it has to do with the laws of the land. That part you can argue. You can't' just say I am wrong and not site the clause.

  • @pinghead105 So what the judge can just call recess and come back in 20 mins, 2 hours or six months time and everyone still has to be there waiting? Without stating a time for recess he has abandoned the court. It has everything to do with being a sovereign, because when you are sovereign you are not subject to ICC or 'admiralty' law. You are ONLY subject to common law. Therefore, as a sovereign you do not have to pay any fines or taxes issued by the state.

  • @w0y1z92753 Unless you can find where in the procedure it says they have to specify a time for the recess to be valid, yes, they have to wait. If you know of any procedure where in the physical absence of a judge, the control of a court goes to whoever yells the loudest, then by all means, please share that with us instead of continuing your fabulation.

  • @w0y1z92753 yes unless you can provide legal court documents stating what the proper procedures for recess are. Just because you claim you are sovereign doesn't mean you are exempt from city, county and state laws where you live. You still have to obey speed limit laws, parking laws etc. I don't really know where you guy get this stuff from. Again you sight our founding fathers but they believed in the rule of law. How do you answer that. If they did what you did they would been in jail.

  • @pinghead105 Why go to a public servants court? You're right, it doesn't work in their court, which is why you just don't go :) Look up the word "Apply", - to beg, look up the word Submit, - bend to another's will, look up "Register", - hand over ownership. Paperwork settles all this gobbledygook , Acts, Statutes, Codes & have nothing to do with anyone but - PUBLIC SERVANTS or TRUSTEES. Which most men and women ARE NOT. look up CONSENT & CONTRACT. Its not hard!

  • @liabilitymate I do invite people to please look these words up and see for themselves that you are lying or have been lied to and are now repeating this lie like the credulous, uncritical moron you are. As opposed of doing like you did and just unquestionably taking some internet yokel's word for it.

  • @dbnkr2011 ha ah ha your dog and pony show is over we see you like vampires in the afternoon sun.

    Consent and Contract that's it.

    Oh that's right like you said the founding fathers needed a license to ride a horse ha ha. don't forget to register that cart.. ha ha you people never grew out of playing dress ups in play school.

  • @liabilitymate I have to seriously wonder if you can tell the difference between a horse and a car.

  • @dbnkr2011 yes it can be argued but a horse is a lot more dangerous than a car especially modern cars air bags et al.

    So Founding Fathers - no license - then LOCK THEM UP my learned friends can hear you say! You control freaks basically freak everyone out with your hypocrisy.

    CONSENT + CONTRACT nothing else matters end of story - no rocket science here to your dismay. God loves us Administrators/Executors.

  • @liabilitymate People don't need a license to ride a horse. They never did.

    This is quickly becoming the stupidest argument I've seen here and that is saying a LOT.

  • @liabilitymate Also I wonder, if your position is so clear, why do you have to lie to support it?

  • @w0y1z92753 "Firstly a 'person' is a legal fiction. " . PROVEN LIE.... ACCORDING TO COMMON LAW A PERSON IS A HUMAN BEING. . "Your birth certificate is your person YOU are either a Man or a Woman. " . WRONG FUCKTARD THAT IS BECAUSE OF BIOLOGY . "Secondly, the Judge did abandon the court, because he failed to state a time frame for the recess. . LIE
  • @greywolf424 Proven lie? Uhhhh excuse me but several legal dictionaries I have come across explicitly state a person is a legal fiction. But whatever, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

  • @w0y1z92753 You got it backward. "Legal fictions" (and I urge you to actually educate yourself on what that term actually means) such a corporations can have "personhood", but that doesn't mean persons are legal fictions. In other words, legal fiction are persons but persons are not legal fictions.

    I will bet that every single legal dictionary you have come across explicitly includes individuals in the definition of person.

  • Comment removed

  • @dbnkr2011 OOOOPS SORRY WRONG PERSON

  • @w0y1z92753 "several legal dictionaries I have come across explicitly state a person is a legal fiction."

    .

    BOLD FACED LIE.... THERE IS NOT ONE THAT SAYS THAT.

  • @greywolf424 Blacks Law Dictionary, 3rd edn.

    Eat a dick, faggot.

  • @w0y1z92753 BLACK'S DICTIONARY DOSE NOT SUPPORT YOUR FUCKING BULLSHIT LOSER.... IN FACT IT CLEARLY SAYS A PERSON IS A HUMAN BEING

  • Comment removed

  • @w0y1z92753 You should actually read what you refer to.

    "PERSON. A man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the right to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties it imposes."

    "The term is, however, more extensive than man. It may include artificial beings, as corporations"

    "It has been said that when the word person is used in a legislative act, natural person will be intended unless something appear in the context to show it applies to artificial persons"

  • i was kind of hoping he would get tazered

  • Look how they use the courtroom security to Threaten the defendant. This should be illegal since they are allowed to have GUNS, BULLET PROOF VESTS, ETC. This is PURE MAFIA TACTICS of the courts.

  • @WulfBand As opposed to walking in with a mob of at least a dozen of people, right?

  • By custom, because the Judge, or magistrate, Bowed, before he left his post and the court room, that means he by default, has abandoned ship and refuses to return a judement for or against the individual standing before him. In fact, if you watch closely, he bowed to "keith" directly, no other person in the room. Lookks like you got your victory

  • @Keystonepatriot

    - Judges customarily bow when entering or leaving the court room. It has no special significance. Look it up.

    - Court reconvened later and Keith was fined.

    - Why would he return a judgement against a random, unidentified yokel who wandered into the court room?

  • love it love it yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

  • Are you Kate of Gaia?

  • @RichardRowell1 Yes. She responded earlier in the comments here (username katiereneethompson)

  • wouldn't it be great if we lived in a world where anyone could park their car anywhere on public property whenever for as long as they wanted....no that would be crazy....absolute bananas

  • SO LEGITIMATE.

  • What was the outcome of the proceeding after departing from court?

  • @djoh0000 Court reconvened a month later. Keith didn't show up. He was fined $260. He refused to pay that and had his driver's license revoked.

    The entire debacle was reported in a local newspaper, the Guelph Mercury (Google "keith thompson guelph mercury" for the articles)

  • lol this was funny

  • The Judge is a cunt.

  • DILLEY vs. DILLEY 2007 that:12.2 The Court notes that Respondent's filings and conduct are consistent with those associated with the "sovereign citizen" domestic terrorist movement.

    Those who don't know are at the mercy of liars!!!

  • @jpnovation its all jurisdiction.

    I know that you know that! & who the real terrorists are!

    Startpage - CONSENT & CONTRACT. While your at it check out Hitler - Reich stag fire.

    In this chimera Nero moment your just pissing in the wind, time is a wonderful ally for truth.

  • @liabilitymate "time is a wonderful ally for truth."

    .

    WHICH IS WHY MORE AND MORE OF YOUR LIES ARE BEING EXPOSED OVER TIME

  • @greywolf424 LOL you just can't get their hey matey?

    One day I hope you can but till then enjoy the ride...

  • @liabilitymate OH I AM ENJOYING EXPOSING YOUR LIES, AND I AM NEVER GOING TO STOP

  • @greywolf424 I SPEAK IN CAPS SO IT MUST BE TRUE

  • @liabilitymate

    : Nisi aliud exigat causa gravis et extraordinaria propter bonum commune ecclesiae. (In other words, unless you show cause of extraordinary evidence that you are not ruled by the Pope you’re presumed to be ruled by The Holy See.)

    In International Law, which is the Supreme Law of the land e.g. Supremacy Clause, you must pledge to support another jurisdiction. The judge said "as long as you contract with your own you will be fine"

  • Guys, we don't live in this freeman world yet. Some of us are trying to work towards it, but as of now there are too many dumb-ass selfish, dishonorable criminals out there to have a system where every man is entirely free. I understand that I am ultimately a free man, but for now I am living in a system, set up for the purpose of regulating (and creating I might add) dumbass criminal scum.

  • I respect you for testing our rights in court...but you cant simply declare yourself not guilty when the Judge clearly called a recess. If you had shown a tad bit more respect, ill bet you would have won this case! Respect is met with respect and disrespect is met with disrespect. That goes for any facet of life, courts, business, its just how it is.

  • @flyinthebug35 he who leaves the venue of battle first admits defeat. If you are acting as a proxy for a fiction and "summon" (as a daemon) a Sovereign, you are putting your own wellbeing in Jeopardy. Real Sovereigns can't afford to respect fiction because the Creator holds them to a high standard. Respect for a fictitious entity is pure foolishness. The Creator only supports those who acknowledge It as first, and dabbling in or bowing to witchcraft (fiction) is strictly verboten.

  • this is inspiring. i need to brush up on my law terminology...

  • @dieyoung SURE, BRUSH UP, THEN YOU CAN LOSE IN COURT LIKE KEITH DID IN THIS VIDEO.

  • @greywolf424 You are a shill to the max, the universe comes for you, like I said your not getting paid I checked, you cant stop whats coming no matter what you do or say, they call me master for a reason, you have accepted your station in this reality on the losing side prepare yourself for what you so rightly deserve, the universe shall grant it so.

  • The state has monopoly over violence. I wish it wasn't so but everything else is theatre.

  • You live in the society - by that fact lone you can't have unlimited "natural" rights. If you would - you can just go around killing people? right? Doesn't that violate the rights of other people in the society? you betcha. If you live in the society you have not only rights - but also RESPONSIBILITIES!

    Also - for all the people out there who got lured by pseudo-legal and pseudo-historical references -> FBI recognizes "sovereigns movement" as EXTREMISTS group, basically DOMESTIC TERRORISTS.

  • @nixd3v Well said. perhaps the feds need to have a look in the mirror and see if the recon who the terrorists are looking back at them...

  • @nixd3v off to the scare tactics division are we? Won't work matey everyone knows on this planet it is being run by criminals called banksters and crims in govt. Who is going around killing people? Can you startpage and type in US drones? How many killed today?

    Freemen save people protect human rights and are to be admired and looked up too they are true patriots.

  • @liabilitymate "Freemen save people protect human rights and are to be admired and looked up too they are true patriots."

    .

    WHAT A LOAD OF BULLSHIT.... THEY ARE A PACK OF UNEDUCATED SELFISH FREELOADERS.