The Greatest Adventure - Stories From The Bible - The Creation Part 1

[YonaArieFeinberg]

שלום, הזמנת חבר לערוץ

''אל האמת'' - שמע ישראל

מועדפים סרטונים FAVORTE 214 - בנושאים שונים ומענינים. מיסטיקה. הדברות. זוהר. קבלה . ועוד

שירים בעברית 234 HEBREW SONGS-

שירים ביידיש 226 - YIDDISH SONG _ ניגונים 119MELODIE-

שירים אנגלית 25 - Songs in English - שירים ברוסית 23 Русские песни –

סרטים ושירים Movies and songs - עברית, יידיש ,אנגלית,צרפתית,רוסית,ספרדית,יו­ונית ,איטלקית, ה¬ודי

English, Yiddish Русские,Spanish,Greek,French, Italian, Indian Hebrew,

HELLO, MEMBER CHANNEL INVITATION

[DreadLordBalnazaar]

FREAKAZOID HELL I missed this!

[tdickensheets]

The Bible is God word. The truth!

[blkplaya19]

@ibendair1 Actually it was no mistake. Unicorns did exist. Just because they are not presently seen doesn't mean that they never were made. A lot of creation was wiped out from the flood but mostly from mankind's greed by hunting for sport. If we start saying that the bible has mistakes just because of translation or no physical evidence then that is not trusting fully in the word. Unicorn translated for them meant unicorn...leviathan meant leviathan.

[EmetTalmudim6]

@blkplaya19 "unicorns" are not a texual mistake; true enough, but context is vital. In this case it is referring to Rhinosauras Unicornos(The Asiatic one horned rhino) & the Middle Easter Wild Ox-Not the oner horned chymera horse of modern fantasy-

[Blackmark52]

@ibendair1 I don't see where I even mentioned plants. But I wonder why you cite scientific fact when you're talking about plants that were magically popped into existence fully grown. What difference does it make whether or not those magical plants could survive a day without sunlight? Why not just believe like RebmaBoss, that that day had sunliight without the necessity of yet having a sun? I am simply pointing out that the whole creation story is ridiculous when compared to reality.

[Chico9569]

ADAM AND EVE WERE BLACK!

[JakobDailes]

@Chico9569 Uh... how do u kno that?

[Chico9569]

@JakobDailes search ''black israelites'', I highly doubt adam and eve as portrayed in the cartoon were white and spoke English. What are you a mormon?

[JakobDailes]

@Chico9569 I don't believe Adam and Eve were white and spoke English. The English is simply so Americans can understand what they're saying, tho they should be darker skinned. I never said I believed that stuff. I'm Protestant. And who says Adam and Eve were Israeli? The Bible doesn't. In fact, it would place them more around Iraq or West India. U wanna go tell a Muslim or a Hindu he/she's black?

[Chico9569]

@JakobDailes first of all muslims and hindus are religous groups not ethnicities, second of all not only should they be darker skinned they should have a different bone structure and another race, not these nordic anglo saxon americans as middle easterns, I could point out many more countless flaws (like dinosaurs, why are there no dinosaurs anymore? God saw flaws in his own creations and annhialated them?), this video is misleading and confusing, unless i can see some of it clearly explained.

[JakobDailes]

@Chico9569 I kno Muslims and Hindus r religious groups, but they r Middle-Eastern too (duh). There were dinosaurs, dude. Did u not watch, like, the first 8 or 9 minutes? God didn't see them as flaws, he said all creation was good. They just died out (probly from Flood/from being hunted down alongside the mammoths). This movie isn't God's Word, it's simply some people's attempt to dramatasize it. Humans (like me and u) make mistakes, dude. Back to the original question: y'd Adam+Eve be black?

[Jakegothicsnake]

@JakobDailes I don't believe Adam and Eve would be blacl/afro. More like somewhere in between afro and anglo like middle-eastern.

[JakobDailes]

@Jakegothicsnake Thank you. Plus, that's where the Bible places them: West Asia. The Middle East. Unless anyone has proof that the Tigris and Euphrates are also part of Africa.

[superindhia]

@Jakegothicsnake How would you know if they were middle eastern there's a good plausibility that they could have been black or white Chinese etc.. The bible doesn't tell us. :]

[EmetTalmudim6]

@superindhia given that Adam & Eve are the ancestors of all humanity they most likely looked like those today who could fit in with any people on earth or like multiethnic indivuals today; In their case the most beautiful traits from all three "races."

[MARIOXLB]

And blackmark52 if you dont belive in god why are you on this HOLY page!!!!!!!!!

[MARIOXLB]

Also to blackmark52 I rebuke you in the name of jesus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[2ue2ue2ue]

that fruit looks like a peach, buy is it really?

[TheNatkidd]

So were Bill and Joe really christian's. Or they just made this cartoon just to get people to know that they are good and not bad by making a christian show.

[wiggaroo]

How come there was light before the sun was made?

[EmetTalmudim6]

@wiggaroo light exists whether a sun does or not-suns are only an accumulation of gasses that produce light; They aren't light itself-

[DSFURGIS]

lol @ 1:23 "yay..."

[redwolf2k]

Shark, Octopus, Whale BAM! PTERADACTYL!

[curlybro7]

Brings back memories!

[funnyclipluvr]

ive grown up with a vhs tape filled with all the episodes in The Greatest Adventures. i <3 it, but unfortunately i need a restored version of it i guess cuz last time i tried to put it on the tracking wouldnt stop acting up. we used to have a player that had tracking adjustments available, but not anymore :"( until i solve that problem, ill hafta stick with youtube. :/

[krauseinthehouse]

I remember this video when I was a kid. This is Great

[PHDcsfan]

did anyone notice a pteradactyl at 5:41

[funnyclipluvr]

@PHDcsfan OMG, no ive never noticed that despite the MANY times ive watched my vhs tape!!! thank u for pointing that out! interesting..

[PHDcsfan]

@funnyclipluvr not only that notice a brachiosaurus at 5:58?

[KairuHakubi]

What an unbelievable story...

Who ever heard of archaeologists that believe in the bible? XD

[funnyclipluvr]

@KairuHakubi im sure there are countless!

[YourProblem1]

Don't watch the first scene while you're high. It will mess you up o.o

[lilpatty92]

and remember that this movie is still an artists rendition; if you study the scriptures and history you will discover that God didn't make dinosaurs; but that they came as a result of the people of earth cross-breading the animals :) and I do believe that God is God and that He owes no man any explanation but I do think that He has given us answers to some things and others we just have to trust. Just like evolutionists have to trust in their hypothesis on how the earth was made.

[funnyclipluvr]

@lilpatty92 where does it say that God didnt make the dinosaurs along with all the rest??? my dad pointed out that unicorns are in there also but it turned out to be something along the lines of "strength of a unicorn".

[JakobDailes]

@lilpatty92 Where does it say God didn't create dinosaurs? I always saw it that he created the dinosaurs, but they died out right about the same time he made man. After all, the Bible does say 1 day to God is like thousands of years (he's outside of time after all).

[lilpatty92]

@JakobDailes Also remember that if you and are to believe that the Garden of Eden was to have been a perfect place without sin or void we also have to acknowledge the fact that there was no death. If you say that the dinosaurs were created but then died off then that means that you acknowledge the presence of sin in a perfect world which is, for a lack of a better word, impossible.

[potionsmistressful]

I spotted a jacaranda tree!!

and the bible is amazing isn't it?

[Blackmark52]

@RebmaBoss Thanks. Have a good holiday too.

[Blackmark52]

@RebmaBoss You are simply dancing around the truth.

Purpose: the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists

[Blackmark52]

@RebmaBoss That response surprises me. I would expect something like: God works in mysterious ways, It's not for us to judge God, our minds can't possibly comprehend, all will be revealed, etc. While those kinds of reply are an obvious cop out, at least they're honest. It seems the height of hubris to suppose you can know the reason for God's existence, yet rgandy accuses me of pride for simply stating the obvious fact that the sun is necessary for daylight. Strange lot, you fellows.

[Blackmark52]

@RebmaBoss I don't believe there is such a thing as nothing. Science seems to be coming to the conclusion that true nothingness is impossible. And it seems to me that the notion of nothingness is more problematic for theists than for atheists: theists put such large import on purpose, but what purpose would a god serve in that eternal void before creation?

[Blackmark52]

@RebmaBoss Science can say a lot more about the nature of light itself, but yes, earth's daylight requires the sun. For you to suggest that you need not believe that in deference to what some ignorant primitive wrote says illustrates just how little you care for truth over fantasy. God as you portray him doesn't know what he's doing, you should show him a bit more respect and make your interpretations agree with reality.

[Blackmark52]

@RebmaBoss Not to question is to remain ignorant. The chef still has to follow the correct order: nobody becomes greatest by adding the ingredients after baking the cake. Light can’t exist without the sun and the stars and it seems you and whoever wrote the bible doesn’t know any better. Good grief, the creation account has the sun and the stars hung on the firmament; that’s the magic dome above the earth that keeps all those waters above out. Do you believe that is still accurate?

[nagaking07]

I'm a Kemetist, but I enjoy watching this.

Besides my religion teacher (I go to a Catholic school, don't ask) who is a Brother, said that the Creation Story is a myth.

But this is entertaining.

[WordsInAction465]

The facts of Nature lead me to know there is a Great Mind that exists. Moral Law tells me it is rational that there is a god that cares about right and wrong, justice, and obedience. Testing transmission of info through centuries tells me the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures are quite reliable in copying and archeaology greatly supports physical events of nations and kings in the Bible. I test the physical prophecies and it is clear Yahweh is the god of Nature and mankind. I test this by science.

[dragonlvrgyrl]

I'm just here for Tim Curry. :T

[p0m91]

haha what a good story, but seriously, read a science book

[rgandy123]

@p0m91 The Bible is the perfect science book. It has every thing you need to know for your whole life.

[Blackmark52]

@rgandy123 Really?? You don't see the problem illustrated by god not making the sun until the fourth day? I'm dumbfounded.

[rgandy123]

@Blackmark52 No I don't see the problem. God did things the way He did for a reason and He can do it anyway he wants He's God. Don't try to wrap your head around understanding Him. You won't be able to.

[Blackmark52]

@rgandy123 Well of course if god is too dumb to know that the sun is the source of daylight, and that night and day is defined by it hitting one side of the earth and leaving the other in shadow meaning day and night happen at the same time, then naturally I won't be able to understand him. Also I don't understand how a person who should know better would believe that daylight just blinked on and off for the first three days.

[rgandy123]

@Blackmark52 Well God is the source of all knowledge so I don't think He is dumb in the slightest. And pride was the first sin. Sounds like u gota bad case of it. I pray God brings u down to where u realize u need His son Jesus Christ. And He is all that matters. I hope to see u in heaven bro love ya.

[Blackmark52]

@rgandy123 Well I'm not likely to turn religious, too old for that. But I do know that it is possible to believe in a god and not lose your sense of reality. You can take the creation myth for what it is and not for an explanation of how the earth formed. You don't have to deny scientific reality in favour of writings of a primitive people only just starting to question a world with no easy answers. There is nothing wrong with seeing the world for what it is.

[cf572]

@rgandy123 why wasnt the dinosaurs there? and why got kill dinosaurs?

[EmetTalmudim6]

@cf572 Dinosaurs;

IF dinosaurs weren't in the Garden of Eden or the pre-Flood world it was because they perished as a result of the fall of satan & his angels. Note; God told Adam & Eve to restore the earth; What were they restoring it from? In that case it wasn't God who killed the dinosaurs but rather satan(either deliberately for vengence sake or indirectly as a result of what he chose to become). Thus, Eden can be seen as a left over refuge of what the world had been intended to be.

[PHDcsfan]

@rgandy123 ? i thought man is gods children im jew by the way

[EmetTalmudim6]

@PHDcsfan in the creative sense yes, mankind are God's "children", But in the personal sense no. I'm a born again Christian, but recently I was watching a

Modern-Orthodox Rabbi teach on Passover when he brought up that the blood on the doorposts was an act of identification-kind of like someone who becomes a US citizen taking the oath of loyalty-Thus, it's not enough to be born a Jew or even circumcised, the ethnic Jew must become a Jew in their heart & mind.

[EmetTalmudim6]

@PHDcsfan on the other hand, until Genesis 12 the Jewish people didn't exist; So unless God's plan is bigger than just the Jews(a fact attested to by the most Orthodox of Jews)the preAbrahamic Patriarchs are screwed.

[juicyplm15]

@Blackmark52 obviously you have read too many science books and closed your mind.

[Blackmark52]

@juicyplm15 Yes, that must be it. I should have read more of the like of Martin Luther:

“Reason is the greatest enemy faith has.”

“Whoever wants to be a Christian should tear the eyes out of his reason.”

"Reason should be destroyed in all Christians.”

[EmetTalmudim6]

@Blackmark52

1.Come, let us reason together

Isaiah 1; 18

2.God is the author of logic & science; He established the World by them.

3.Luther-a collage professor-was referring to our LIMITED reason as opposed to God's HIGHER reason; in otherwords to come to faith we must realize that WE don't know everything & must therefore depend on what we do know & trust God-Being Who He is-will reveal all we don't know when it is time to do so & not before that.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Uh, dude. God is our light. He supplied the daylight for those days. He can do whatever he wants cuz he has unlimited power and infinite knowledge. If anything, Science proves that Genesis is true. According to science, land appeared after water, aquatic creatures were the first living species, then birds, then mammals (at least if my scientific history book is true). Also, scientists think at one point all Earth was covered in water (the Flood).

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes I find it utterly mind boggling that you could think anyone would take comments so antithetical to a scientific understanding of reality at all seriously. That you say science supports Genesis makes me doubt you took any legitimate science courses at all. One day a week in Sunday school doesn’t count as a scientific education. Sorry fella, the earth does orbit the sun, the sun came first, and there was never enough water on earth to cover all the land.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 I've taken a physics class, several glasses on geology and weather, and I even have a history textbook (written by an atheist) that backs up wha I'm saying. I never said the Earth didn't orbit the Sun. The Bible just says that the Sun came after the Earth. Never enough water on Earth? I'm sorry, but do u actually do any research other than a few elementary school textbooks.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes I find it utterly mind boggling that you could think anyone would take comments so antithetical to a scientific understanding of reality at all seriously.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Dude, what do you think ur Einstein? Are u just using big words in the hope that no one will understand what ur saying? Why is it mind-boggling? It's the truth. There is a God who created everything, with an infinite love for us, who cares for us, and to show it he came down in human form and died for us to be forgiven of all sin. He defeated Death and Satan, and resurrected himself after 3 days to show us his infinite power. What needs to be explained?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Considering the outlandishness of your claims, nothing needs be explained because you are talking nonsense. Your comments show either a gross misunderstanding of science or you are simply making things up.

Do you really think that some "history book" written by an "atheist" is a valid citation? It causes me to wonder why you consider the opinion of this particular atheist so impeccable. You are the one making the claims; give your sources.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 It's an actual history textbook used in schools. And it's by an atheist, so you know it's not Christian thinking mixed in. It's actually what atheists believe due to scientific fact, meaning that if the Bible agrees with it, than both must be true. What is outlandish? Do u just not want to explain yourself in fear of being wrong? How can we have a conversation if I don't kno what ur saying? Look up what I said about the beginning of the world online or in a science book, it's true.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes You only say that since what you say about a certain book agrees with the bible, it must be true. I'm asking: What is this book? Does it say what you claim? In what respect does it agree with the bible? How do you know the author is an atheist? And so what if he is; is he a credible scientist? Considering what the Texas SBOE is trying foist upon the US educational system, pardon me for not being impressed with such unsubstantiated claims. Can you show any source for any claim?

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 The Usborne Encyclopedia of World History by Jane Bingham, Fiona Chandler, ad Sam Taplin. They are all atheist, because in the book they clearly express the views of the Big Bang and evolution. The book says that land and water were the first things on Earth. It continues to state that the first life were aquatic creatures, followed by birds, followed by land-animals. Then humans came into being. This almost directly corresponds with the order of the creation-account in Genesis.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Just because the book mentions evolution doesn't make the authors atheists: a great many Christians accept evolution and the big bang and from a diverse perspectives as William Lane Craig to the Pope. But really, what you are citing is a children's book!! Here's part of a review from Amazon: "This is great for Josh right now in first grade." And it's not even science, it's general history. How am I supposed to take you seriously??

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Uh, you're not technically a Christian if u believe Big Bang and Mass evolution. They deny God created us, which means these guys rnt Christians, no matter how much they lie and say they are (do u not even READ the Bible?)

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 (cont.) The book gathers all its information on prehistory from what science tells us (except of course mass evolution and big-bang, which r only theories). Look it up, it's true.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes You clearly don't know what a theory is. There is Gravitational Theory, Music Theory, Mathematical Theory, etc. Because these are theories does that mean we don't know how fast an apple falls? Does it mean that music is somehow false? Does it mean that the math we use to build computers and make airplanes fly is only guesswork? Theories are the top of science understanding. Einstein's theories are more true than Newtons' Laws. Evolutionary theory is irrefutably true. Look it up.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 I believe evolution, dude, just not mass evolution ("we evolved from monkeys, who, of course, evolved from replites! Because monkeys have scales, no matter what anyone tells u!"). By the way, calling something a theory and it being a theory are different. Those things you mentioned are proven, so they aren't technically theories in the sense that they are only ideas. Mass evolution and the Big Bang are only ideas, tho.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes So a christian isn't a christian if he understands and accepts modern scientific theory. (You still don't understand what theory means, but if that is beyond your ability so be it.) You think in order to be a christian you must remain as ignorant as a bronze age sheep herder. Okay, at least you practice what you preach. You use a history book written for eight year olds as your source of scientific understanding and you can't even understand that very well. God must be proud of you.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Uh, that's not the only history book i use. It was just the one that happened to be on my desk. Also, if it's a book for kids, then isn't it true? Unless all of a sudden, adult's are lying to kids in a book that's supposed to be true. I don't use it for scientific understanding, it just helps prove my point. What r u saying, that the books lying about that stuff. Wouldn't that also mean it's lying about Big bang and evolution being real?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes "if it's a book for kids, then isn't it true?"

I'm not saying it isn't true, I am saying it is simplified for children. Frankly, I don't know what it says. But what you are saying that it says is in all probability untrue: from the little you say, you are just looking for a way to interpret it as fitting with the bible and ignoring any words that don't fit. I am saying that I can't take what an adult that would cite a children's book seriously. It's not even a science book!

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Then look it up dude. You'll find the same stuff that the book says about the beginning of the world. The evidence fits the Bible, tho. Go on, look it up.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Just because it's modern scientific theory does that mean it's right? How do u kno it's right or true? Just because someone tells u? Also, i'm just so happy that u apparently believe nothing at all. That is your religion, right? Nothing at all. Because so far that's all u've told me about what u believe. A bronze age sheep herder is ignorant? How?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Ignorant means lacking in knowledge.

Scientific theory represents the height of human knowledge. Theory is not just "only ideas." It is a huge compendium of facts proven to comply to all known scientific law, checked, verified, over and over, over years of study by all scientists in the field. Evolutionary theory is how we know how germs mutate and how vaccines and antibiotics work, it is how we can identify people by their DNA. It is how we got to the moon.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Like I said, i believe in evolution, just not mass evolution. And i don't believe in the Big Bang. What proof do u have for those?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Since there is no such thing as mass evolution, I suppose I don't believe in it either. I guess what you meant to say was macro (as opposed to micro) evolution, but in truth there is no such distinction: there is only Darwinian biological evolution. Macro/micro evolution is a distinction made up by creationists because they couldn't deny evolution altogether. After all, we see evolution in action all the time.

/watch?v=Pb6Z6NVmLt8&feature=f­eedu

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes The big bang is different science altogether from evolution. It is cosmology. The big bang is simply an extrapolation of what we see when we look at celestial objects. They are all moving away from each other. That means that they must have all originally been in the same place. Don't mistake the big bang for an explosion. There was no bang, there wasn't even a flash of light. There is no sound in space and light came later. The first nanoseconds are still not understood.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Then how come they call it "big bang"? Doesn't that name kinda imply a large explosion? And why do most people use it as a substitution for creation? I believe microevolution, but not macro. I don't believe all mammals were reptiles at first, or all reptiles were aquatic creatures at first... It doesn't make sense and it's anti-Biblical. I believe microevolution in fact explains a lot in the Bible, like how Noah had all the animals on one ark.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Big Bang was not coined to be descriptive. In fact, the person that first used it meant it as a joke because he believed in the steady state model. Regardless, there was no bang. Nothing exploded.

You need to bear in mind that biblical creation condenses all creation into one event over a mere 7 days. In science the big bang and the creation of earth are billions of years apart. The formation of earth and animals are millions of years apart.

(see part 2)

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 How do u know science is right in saying all these things?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Did you watch the video? You should try to understand that evolution doesn't say mammals used to be reptiles and reptiles used to be fish: that is just nonsense creationists say about evolution. And frankly, creationists spread a lot of lies.

No animal used to be another animal, but all animals have ancestors that were different, and the farther back you look back the more different they were to what they are now. But it's like a tree, branches don't grow together at the ends.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Yes, i watched the video. What does that have to do with evolution? Personally, a person like u who claims to know so much about science should kno there r Creationists, and there r Christians: the 2 r not the same however. Creationists simply believe in creation. Christians believe in God. If there is no "mass evolution", then why do so many people believe in it?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Creationists believe in the biblical story of creation. That means creationists could be christian, jewish, or muslim. But most american creationists are christian. There are other creation myths, but that isn't relevant.

(see part 2)

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Dude. Ever heard of "Intelligent Design"? Look it up. Yahweh isn't the ONLY thing creationists believe. And even most creationists I've heard of that do believe a God don't believe in the Prophets or Jesus or anything.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes "Ever heard of "Intelligent Design?"

Of course. Intelligent Design is christian creationism, it's just not young earth creationism (which I suspect you subscribe to). It's total nonsense that pretends to be scientific. One of the leading centres for I.D. is the Discovery Institute. The DI is controlled by the Baptist Church.

I don't really get the point you are trying to make. You seem to spend a lot of time saying christians that don't hold your beleifs aren't christians.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Christians who don't hold my beliefs RNT Christians, because all my beliefs come straight out of the Bible. Also, I've taken several theology classes. Personally, just because the Baptist Church controls ONE ID center, that doesn't mean it controls them all. I do not believe young earth creationism.

[MARIOXLB]

@Blackmark52 What do you beilive in because i belive in god and im christian and you say the bible is some faulty book no your stupid and faulty for treating good like crap when he created you.

[Blackmark52]

@MARIOXLB I can't "treat" a mythological being in any particular way any more than I can treat a comic book hero in any sort of way. The only people who would get upset with me for bad mouthing Spiderman would be Spiderman fans. Spiderman can't care because Spiderman doesn't exist. See how it works? It's the same with God. The only ones who feel mistreated by my not showing proper respect for God are those that don't know he's not real. Think. Why would a god exist before anything else?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes The video is entirely about evolution.

Part of our misunderstanding is language, part is your lack of understanding of what evolution is. When I say there is no difference between micro and macro evolution, I meant all evolution is very small changes. When I say no animal was ever a different animal, I mean whatever an animal is born as is what it is, and it is always the same animal as its parents. But small differences add up: birds did evolve from dinosaurs.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 How do u kno birds evolved from dinos? Reptiles might've, since they're kinda like the same family, but bird? What's ur proof?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes Don't be swayed by casual observation. A professional can much better tell which attributes show whether things are related. There is mounting evidence that birds have descended from dinosaurs, first from fossil evidence, but now even more persuasively from DNA evidence: /watch?v=C_fm1ebqkSA&feature=r­elated YouTube vidoes on about this are easy to find (as are creationist propaganda videos trying to discredit the proof) /watch?v=NLaIFf96PP4&feature=r­elated

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Isn't it possible, tho, that dinosaurs and chickens could simply be anatomically similar? Personally, I believe the idea that all species are a result of evolution is propostrous. Makes no sense and it's against the Bible. Altho I do believe in micro-evolution.

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes There is just too much evidence to support the idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs for it not to be true. And it isn't just about appearances. There is also the genetic evidence.

You keep repeating that "it's against the Bible." But what the hell does the bible know? Little or nothing, and much of what it says is plainly wrong. I simply don't know why you would trust such a faulty book.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 I truly hope God humbles u so u may discover the truth of his glory.

Also, really, the evolutional "fact" that we came from monkeys, which came from reptiles, etc. is propostrous. If so, what was first, before of of that? Didn't those animals have to come from something if there's no God?

[Blackmark52]

@JakobDailes It's sad that theists suggest others should be more humble, while having the conceit to believe there is an all-powerful god that favours them above all others. They take of the fruits of science every day to live better, healthier, and longer, and then claim it is their god that makes their lives better, even though they can't show a damn thing that their god can do. Hollow words, invisible man, superstition, and ignorance. You can have it. I'll pass.

Been fun.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Oh. okay. well, sorry for u. Hope u live ur life well, considering...

Funny, I actually had some new proof that God exists but oh well (u probly wouldn't have taken my word for it anyway). See ya.

[JakobDailes]

@Blackmark52 Oh. okay. well, sorry for u. Hope u live ur life well, considering...

Funny, I actually had some new proof that God exists but oh well (u probly wouldn't have taken my word for it anyway). See ya (or not, I guess, since we've never met)

[hawklord2001]

@rgandy123 When referring to god, there is y nothing to understand.

[ErichJSanford]

@Blackmark52

Sarcasm right?

[p0m91]

@rgandy123 Science like:

Leviticus 15: 28 - When she is cleansed from her discharge (period) , she must count off seven days, and after that she will be ceremonially clean. On the eighth day she must take two doves or two young pigeons and bring them to the priest at... the entrance to the Tent of Meeting. The priest is to sacrifice one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. In this way he will make atonement for her before the LORD for the uncleanness of her discharge.

mad..

[skilla23]

@p0m91 John 14:6 Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

[GabrieLaVedier]

How awesomely retro and completely ridiculous, as all Toons were back in the day. Also, hooray for Tim Curry.

[lizazoon]

Deuteronomy 25:11-12 NASB

If two men, a man and his countryman, are struggling together, and the wife of one comes near to deliver her husband from the hand of the one who is striking him, and puts out her hand and seizes his genitals, then you shall cut off her hand; you shall not show pity.

[toxictwin7]

dope intro so trippy haha

[dougmoerhoffman]

They're very clever about not proclaiming old-earth or young-earth creationism over the other.

What with the volcanoes and the animals not being shown eating one another. Very clever, very clever.

[Jakegothicsnake]

They drew the animals and Adam and Eve so well done. :)

[Jakegothicsnake]

I find it interesting that they would depict dinosaurs and creatures seen in evolution book along with the animals we see today. Don't get the wrong idea I personally don't believe in evolution.

[nannyies1994]

thanks i also have watched these when i was little i always watched the videos instead of reading godbless you

[BriggOfEden]

Thank you for posting these! I remember these videos from when I was little. But all the VHS tapes got destroyed in a house flood! THANK YOU!. God bless you!