Added: 3 years ago
From: HellwrathUK
Views: 81,051
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (428)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WTF Imma kill Stalin then I am gon.... Wait... He is already dead X3

  • "those who look and DO NAZI" LOL

  • This wasn't how the book ended!

  • Very interesting.....just glad we've won and this didn't happen.

  • ( 2 . ) Men moet, om dit te fantaseren, welhaast van de ratten besnuffeld zijn, of zich van Amerikaanse regisseursherkomst weten! We moeten het de Yanken meegeven : in alle onmogelijke en kromme situaties redden zij de wereld op filmisch-cabaretesque wijze van alle mogelijke en onmogelijke tirannen, buitenaardse wezens en wereldnatuur- en -klimaatrampen! Zij menen God op aarde te kunnen spelen, zoals God zich slechts in Frankrijk thuisvoelt!

  • Het einde van de film is ietwat goedkoop, misschien prozaïsch-voorspelbaar en abrupt. Een ander einde zou echter langdradig-saai geworden zijn. Omdat de 'almachtige' V.S. van N.A. geen verbond sluiten met Germania loopt alles spaak. Dit is natuurlijk een belachelijke suggestie en constatering na 30 jaar Germania. Zoveel gewonnen en nog meer bestreden dan wel doorstaan, voor geen kleintje vervaard ( Denk aan de 6.000.000! ), en dan zou men buigen voor dat samenraapseltje smeltpot-amerikanen?

  • The ending was a let down

  • I thought about a seqel : I called it Fatherland 2 Rise of the Reds and it's set after this film . The failure of the strategic alliance between the Reich and the USA has allowed the Soviet Union to expand unchecked and its new leader , Alexander Romanov has chosen this moment to attack . The sequel opens with the rebuilt Soviet war machine threatening to wipe the Greater Reich off the map .

  • 2) Parts of the film suggests Germany won Stalingrad (the autopsy guy clearly fought there). The USSR would never give up Stalingrad unless USSR can offer no resistance against Germany. Furthermore, the fact Kennedy is agreeing ally with Hitler means the USA's lend lease policy was no longer in effect with USSR. With the war dragging on so long, it seems crazy on how USSR has the resources to overcome Hitler.

    This film should be set in a parallel universe than protraying an alternative ending.

  • @TKKTism Even if the germans made it to the Ural mountains there would be 2 million square miles of russia left to conquer. 

  • Despite allowing poetic licence, I still dislike how it provides an alternative history extremely detached from the important elements in real history which could be kept in an alternative history where Germany won.

    1) Hitler most likely wouldn't have killed so many Jews (6-7 mil) during the war if he had won the war. The rise of killing of Jews coupled with Hitler's desperation to deal with Jews under the pressure of both Soviet and Allied both closing up to Berlin.

  • thanks for uploading!

  • The book is a masterpiece of writing, this film does not do it justice at all.

  • A nice friendship with America failed so the empire collapsedXD LOL

  • 3 and 1/2 minutes of credits at the end?

    It's like the nazis really did win the war.....

  • It was good to start with got more and more shit towards the end

  • Turned a perfectly good book into such a shit film, first time I have watched from beginning to end, now I know why. What a fucking embaressment,

  • "Son, I just called to tell you that it's your fault I got shot. What are you a retard?"

  • This was an interesting idea. The whole "because the alliance didn't go through the empire collapsed" was a bit of a stretch. Mabye if they had made it so that it was pretty obvious Russia was winning or something. I've heard this is based of a book so mabye they talk about it more in the book. Anyone know?

  • This is really a stupid movie......just goes to show you how a good ideea can be turned to crap.

  • Lovely. Both main characters die in the end, the Soviets take over and control everything from China to the UK. Better than the Nazis? Perhaps. But I don't think the US can survive the resulting nuclear war.

  • WHAT A STUPID MOVIE ...

  • Finished watching this movie for the fourth time. The first time I'd seen it was in the late 90's. Powerful film; a good speculation about the events. Evil will always get what it deserves. To the millions of innocent Jews who died at the hands of that lunatic: Kiddush Hashem. Baruch Hashem.

  • government policy could not be changed on the spur of the moment on the basis of a few dubious pictures...kennedy would have met hitler.....the british invented concentration camps, experimented with anthrax weapons in ww2.....on eisenhowers orders, german pows were kept on a 600 calorie per day diet to keep them compliant....firebombing of civilians was another british invention...close cooperation with soviet, and red partisans is very british, who even now love russians...

  • The movie is good,except the ending explanation,because Germania was a superpower and it wasn't going to collapse even if both America and Japan get out of alliance,so the only thing what could've happened is a WW3 with Germania vs America and again Russia.Then Germania would crush America and Russia will return its territories and the World would have had Germania and Russia instead of today's America and Russia.And I pefer Germania than America today!

  • I find this movie rather amusing, it was quite realistic at first (except for the majority of the architecture that would never look like that in Germania), but what happend in the end with Joe Kennedy Sr. is just so unrealistic it becomes silly.

  • This film had a strong start and a very, very bad ending.

  • I quite enjoyed this movie, thanks for uploading. I enjoy a good mystery/thriller with some alt.hist thrown in is just icing on the cake. Great visual style, great acting and good screenplay. I also found all the holocaust deniers' comments to be very funny. Nothing like YouTube brings sheds light on the worst among us.

  • That ending almost reduced me to tears!!!

  • Wrong flag (48-star) in front of the hotel, or on the cars. Which is it? 48 or 50 states?

  • Holy shit, this movie is ridiculous.

  • That movie suckkkked!!!!!!

  • This would have never fucking happened.

  • So, the ratzis get whupped and the SOVIETS take over. I just LOVE a happy ending!

  • @talochIV Read the comment I made below about the sequel called Fatherland 2 Rise of the Reds .

  • Wow what a strong and intensely great movie~! Though...if you think about it... The Germans would never have Succeeded in killing off the entire Jewish race. Remember people.. every time they have come so close to being Destroyed GOD has saved them, after all they are the "CHOSEN PEOPLE" So you got to figure that sooner or later everyone trying to kill them off will die and they will Prevail. Guess Hitler made a HUGE mistake when he decided to target them.For Germany...."Failure Is an Option" :)

  • LOL as if an empire could collapse like that.

  • @ImAllFact

    You would be surprised. Empires such as the Soviet Union which had decades behind it, to the Romans which had lasted entire centuries collapsed relatively quickly. In the last year 3 more autocracies, like Nazi-Germany, fell in the Arab Spring. History proves that Empires rarely undergo some kind of gradual decline. Since this film is set in the 60's and the war ended in the 40's, a 20-ish year old Empire could collapse from such a small incident. Especially if it is an Autocracy.

  • @ProcrastiKing The Roan Empire took centuries to decline to irrelevancy, and even then it took the breaking up of the empire. The Soviet Union was really no longer a threat in the early 1980's. Collapsed in 1991. The Arab countries aren't collapsing, their governments are just changing.

  • @ProcrastiKing My guess: The Reich would completely disintegrate by 1975

  • the damn ignorant jews started it ....do real research fag

  • fucking jews

  • @italian1413 fucking fascists.

  • The thing about Nazi Germany is that once Hitler would die it would likely go the way of Yugoslavia where the different factions within the country fight for power to the point of all out war. A dictatorship can only run as long as a new and strong dictator replaces the old one. It's unlikely that it would have outlasted the Soviet Union from our time.

  • Sadly we never learn from the lessons of history look at the War in Bosnia Britain had to beg America etc to intervene we couldnt do it alone. 

  • @majesticscot Have some pride man. We begged america for NOTHING ! If the useless assholes that are in power in Britain new how to not waste money and resources then the armed forces would be better equiped. Being realistic though Britain is a tiny country compaired to most and we havn't bowed to anyone since the Roman occupation. America is not better than us they just have greater numbers

  • Finallly , during the credits , we hear the following conversation :

    Alexander Romanov :"Is it done Yuri ?"

    Yuri :"No comrade premier . It has only began ."

  • what a stupid son

  • The book was by far, better than the movie. Though, it is nice to put some images to the characters and the style of that probable life.

  • this film was highly flawed and the leaking of the Holocaust probably wouldnt have happened if it did anti semitic ism would have been all but forgotten cause the jewish people and culture probably would have been whipped from history of human civilization just like thousands of tiny tribal cultures that got whipped out when the romans had an empire

  • @joshuaajones7185 The Jews aren't... Ok Weren't exactly a "small" people.

  • i personally dont get this film

  • Hitler got left standing on his little altar.

  • Comment removed

  • good job murdering your dad, kid.

  • I can't imagine what the world have been look like today if the Nazi's ruled the entire world..

  • @Peekarica Why can't you imagine a world of greatness?  Imagine television not having Jews pushing all the sex, drugs and violence. Imagine the media not attacking Christianity at every turn. Germany saw what the Jews in Russia were doing and tried to stop it. We have only ourselves to blame for the disgusting society we live in now.

  • @AxisSalley Wait, the Jews were pushing communism in Russia and Capitalism in the States ??? how does that work ? oh and btw in Denmark we have more sex,drugs and violence on tv, but we have almost no Jews, but I guess it's the Muslims fault then, right ?

    But I wont try to reason too much with you, you have obviously had too much of the nazi kool aid

  • @TigerWOo OMG do you live under a rock? Who was Karl Marx? Who was Trotsky? Why don't you take five seconds and google Jews in Russia? LOL are you in third grade?

  • @TigerWOo It took me all of 30 seconds to see Jews play a major role in your entertainment.

  • @AxisSalley What did you see, and how did you determine it was run by jews ? ??? again we don't have any jews, how can they control the media if they aren't there ? I know who Marx and Trotsky are, I was pointing out the ridiculousness of claiming a jewish conspiracy when jews were working against each other. jews are not the problem, stupid religious people like yourself who fill themselves up with hate so they can forget their own petty exitence are the fucking problem.

  • without the defeat of germany the US would be behind on ICBM's and jet fighter's germany's tech was way past the usa and there would have been no chance that the reich would have been stopped. with theending of bombings on germany by the western allies the germans would have steam rolled the russians , just imagine 3000 jet fighters taking the russian sky's and the thousands of King Tigers pushing the russians to the peace table germany would have settled for peace ... for time to rearm

  • They never said what happened to FDR. And JPK would've still gone through with the meeting even after seeing the pictures.

  • if the nazis won ww2 we wood have see the buring of jerusalem, and fall of israel as well as big civil war, but hitler wood not live to today, and wood the reich last to today without hitler. yes, but it wood be half the of size it was in 1940-1943.

  • @blackjacklover70 If Hitler and Nazi Germany had won the war, MANKIND would be History after the CRUZADE they'd raise against the human civilization. This movie is a very good example of how sick, ill, insane, madly-blind and absolutely senseless is the Nazi Mind. A true cancer to mankind, which we might always watch carefully to prevent it from ever returning! ;)

  • @DerAdventurer I like how you spelled that with a 'Z'. Is that a CRU'Z'ADE against 'Z'ionism?! If so, then it would have saved humanity.

  • @catalystleader Okay, nobody is perfect and everyone makes mistakes. The word is ----CRUSADE--- English is not my first language.

    And to blame jews for anything is a typical nazi thing. NaziGERMANS were the evil. After the jews, they would kill japs(who were their "allies") and blacks, and muslims, and CHRISTIANS who werent blond blue-eyed and every single one who was not "the aryan type". Therefore have principles and stop defending those criminals.

  • @DerAdventurer You don't have to be Jewish to be a Zionist. Nor are all Jews Zionists. And what basis do you make the claim that the Nazis would have killed blacks and Muslims? There were Muslims and Africans that served in the German military. You are also exaggerating about the Aryan look and so forth as Hitler himself did not have blond hair or blue eyes.

  • @catalystleader Blond and blue-eyed is a figure of speech. Hitler himself wasnt any of both. However, if you get to read about nazis you will observ they were focused on cleaning the entire planet of what they disliked. And I have all reasons to believe they would betray even the japanese. They wanted to rule. They wanted to impose. They did not want to argue. And yes. I defend the state of Israel - which does commit ALOT of errors - but I also want the State of Palestine, since I do seek peace.

  • It's got a pretty good production but a very bad storyline.

  • yeh you snitched your own father up. follow him. take a gun and shoot yourself. lol.

  • I do not think this was a secret amongst leadership. While Japan committed war crimes in Nankin and greater China, they did not send nearly 30,000 Jews to Germany from Shanghai as requested per the Tripartite Pact. The Japanese knew what fate lied ahead of the Jews and so did other International leaders. Sooner or later, oil reserves from the Middle East would be needed to feed the trans-European regime. Moreover, so many languages and cultures would not maintain their hetrogeneity.

  • @go4gopher There was a huge difference between literally bloodthirsty Japanese military leadership and the much more sane rest of the society. Even Japanese civilian political leaders lived in fear of a brazen assassination by "their" officers all the time. Capitulation of Japan was practically a conspiracy, winning the support of the Emperor, but even then some military madmen have stormed the Emperor's palace and the prime minister's office to stop it before it happens.

  • Ugghh, all the commentary about this and that. It's a FICTIONAL STORY people!! Alternate history. Just one example of many of the what ifs. Joe Kennedy might have been anti Semite in real life, but in this FICTIONAL STORY, he is not. Get over your selves.

  • I dont think that the release of those photo's would have toppled the reich, after all the United States Government drove Native Americans to the point of extinction and its practically passed off as a necessity. Seems they ran out of production time because of th eabrupt ending.

  • @Broadhammer America was supplying weapons and fuel to Russian guerillas and refusing to attend the Olympics because of Germany. The US and her allies control the entire Pacific and with support from the British Commonwealth and South America, a virtual Oceania could form. With a German controlled Eurasia(minus Britain) and China remaining stubborn with their own rule(Eastasia) you have the set up for 1984. Obviously a different one with Oceania being the good guys.

  • @Broadhammer

    Really? And did you forget that everyone is a hypocrite? Just because the US slaughtered Native Americans doesn't mean they wouldn't condemn the Nazis for slaughtering Jews. As it is, they did anyway during the war and continue to do so today. Nobody likes to be held accountable for the bad things they do, but they sure as hell will persecute others for doing the same thing. In this story, the collapse of the Reich would have happened gradually, much like the Soviet Union's.

  • @Elfrunner If you pay any attention to what I wrote at the beginning ie:the first 3 words "I dont think" you would know its an opinion, I wasnt arguing anything, relax a bit.

  • @Broadhammer

    Yep. And I was including a few details to your opinion. You'll find that people don't put up a stink for massacres and genocides that take place in their own countries. The Nazis did it to people outside their own country, so everyone acts with a bleeding heart over it.

  • @Elfrunner

    read your history book. Nazis killed a lot of german citizens (not including the jews) as well. Ever hear of the Gestapo?

  • @Broadhammer you are rught it will not. because it is not in real life. thing is that this movie is not fiction. such country existed, just had other name USSR. and such country exists called Russian Federation. Have ever Obama got interested where have dissapeared 250 000 Chechens? why are human rights activists and journalists disapearing in Russia? who is poisoning with Polonium those who opose regime? no space to list all crimes.despite all this Obama is proud of "reset" policy with Russia.

  • @Broadhammer "Native Americans", I presume you mean the Indians in the today's USA, like everwhere decimated mostly by the new diseases (well, Cuba was special as apparently they were practically ALL worked to death by Spaniards). Anyway what "the point of excinction" is this when there are more of them today than EVER?

  • What utter Smithsonian Institute, there were only 1 million Native American people north of the Rio Grande in 1492 theory tripe. I'd look at the burial mounds in or around the former land of the Iroquis nation of the upper mid-west. They could have supported a population at contact of 1 million plus in that area alone. Spanish explorers compared Mexico City in 1519 to Constantinople in terms of size, the largest city of its time.

  • @Broadhammer I agree. I think the US would have condemned the Third Reich for war crimes, and Germany would be forced to make a peace alliance with Russia. I'm just glad they never got that far.

  • @Broadhammer

    Yes, it is sad what happened to the Native American's but what does that have to do with a fictional movie? Please stay relevant, thanks.

  • @Broadhammer Yes but that was known worldwide, this is a total exstinction of the european jewish people probably 10 times more than the indian population

  • @Broadhammer

    That comment regarding the native americans is not even remotely relevant to this movie. How would you even think to work that in there in the first place?

  • @Broadhammer Actually it's likely that without American help the war with the Soviets would have bankrupted then (as the soviet's war with Afghanistan did them) triggering a Soviet-like collapse.

  • @Broadhammer but in the 1700s-1945 it was perfectly accepable to discriminate against & wipe out tribal native peoples...... but to do the same thing to white europeans is a diffrent thing compleatly. You dont hear about imperial germanys african holocaust in Nambia do you? because it was against a native tribal people. ie nobody cares. But if in the film most people didn't know about it bacause it was coverd up , then it would be a disaster for any diplomatic relations if it came out

  • I dont think that the release of those photo's would have toppled the reich, after all the United States Government drove Native Americans to the point of extinction and its practically passed off as a necessity.

  • So the ending is like: Joseph Kennedy returns to the USA, after he saw the pictures? And then the Third Rich collapsed because of this?

  • Very unlikely story.

    If the Normandy landing would have failed the Russians would have ended their unstopable advance at the shores of the North Sea and the Atlantic, at the latest in the spring of 1946. Not the mention the very likely possibillity of the US deploying the A bomb.

  • The problem is...Joseph Kennedy was a nazi sympathizer. The producers of this movie must've known it but they just decided to make this pro-America type of shit. I liked everything about this movie except its terrible quality (why) and the ending.

  • @LocoGroove TV Movie, low budget.

  • @voidlam That's right, but low budget doesn't equal terrible ending. Joe Kennedy hated jews...

  • @LocoGroove Shrug, unless they made it in to a series they have a strict time-line they can use.

  • @LocoGroove So did Henry Ford until he found out about the Holocaust. Remember until it actually happened there was no precedent for it (i.e. most people never knew about the Armenians killed in Turkey around the turn of the 19th/20th century), so it was really horrifying even to people who never cared much for Jews.

  • @danning1 Cared much? Antisemitism is a little bit different thing than being careless about jews.

  • Great film but the ending ruined it. Shame on you America biased Hollywood :(

  • thanks for the upload

    nice movie(Y)

  • I believe Hitler would have not had an Alliance with the United States. He would have used England as a station to launch an attack on the United States. With the U.S. soldiers defeated at Normandy their resources would have buckled putting so much into it and Hitler would have defeated the United States with Russia soon to follow. While entertaining I feel Hitler would have taken another path and he probably would not have been alive in the 60's because he was really sick in 1945.

  • I agree that the book is much better but thanks for the upload. Personally I don't see the ending words of the film to very likely. Germany would in the 1960's already developed their own atomic bomb and they would probably had been able to launch a strike against the US. By then the US would have very little impact on the future of Europe.

  • @MrMugg

    There are much more complex layers in politics than simply dropping a bomb on one's enemies. Once those pictures became world knowledge, not everyone would be further supporting Nazi Germany. Germany certainly wouldn't have responded with a nuclear strike any more than the Soviet Union did in our history. The scenario is not so cut-and-dried. They may have entered into a Cold War against the US and other nations, but the collapse of the Reich would have happened eventually.

  • @Elfrunner Of course it's not that simple however Germany would not have shared the faith of Soviet Union. Germany would have had a much more solid ground to dominate Europe in a way Soviet Union never did.

    I honestly don't believe the US would have had any type of influence in Europe. In fact I belive Hitlers own version of the monroe-doctrine would have tied other parts of the world firmly to Germany. The greater German Reich would eventually have serious problems after Hitlers death though.

  • @MrMugg

    A good example would be to read Harry Turtledove's novel In The Presence of Mine Enemies. It details the Third Reich with far greater influence over the world than depicted here in Fatherland. In it, not only did the Nazis win World War II, but World War III happened, which allowed Germany to gain a tighter hold over other countries. It's worth taking a look.

  • @Elfrunner I will look it up, thanks.

  • @MrMugg actually both the us and nazi germany were nuclear powers..the reason wny the nazis were driving for peace in their cold war ws cos their economy and social structure was on the brink of collapse in the novel...they couldnt use nukes due to fearing the americans would retaliate..plus their are other world powers in the novel and reasons why if the holocaust got out then nazis woudl fall....the film diverges alot of things

  • @MrMugg The nazis were planning an atomic bomb from 1930-1940s But for an unknown reason they stopped.

  • @SiCGaming123 They did not stop - just delayed cos Norwegian heroes stopped heavy water getting through to Germany by destroyed a factory developing heavy water and blown up a ferry in which a train-load of heavy water aboard in middle of a Norwegian lake.

    The bombs does not work without heavy water so had to build somewhere in Germany to make heavy water which could take long time to complete. By the time it was almost finished the factory was overran by US forces, thus the bomb was useless.

  • @SiCGaming123 They didn't stop research, but made it a low priority. The Nazis never came close to having the A-bomb and would have needed many more years (and a MUCH greater investment) to produce one. There was just no way that after '41 Germany could have managed it before the end of the war. As brave as it was the sabotage of the Norwegian heavy water production didn't have any real effect on the Nazi A-bomb project as it was moribund anyway.

  • @Ranillon Actually, I saw a documentary only a few weeks back which is disturbing.  They canme VERY close!

  • @borgduck Damn typo's!!

  • @borgduck You must have watched a bad documentary. By 45 the Germans had barely managed a working atomic pile. From that point the US required many billions of dollars, tens of thousands working at factories free of enemy attack, and nearly 4 years to get an A-bomb. Thus, the Germans were many years away from their own bomb assuming they could have EVER managed it (since they faced enemy attack and a lack of proper funding).

  • @Ranillon I'm too tired to argue with you, & want to go to bed. Tomorrow, I shall debate!

  • @borgduck This isn't a debate -- I am just repeating known facts. Unless you are arguing that "close" to having the A-bomb means YEARS away then the Germans weren't close. Basically, they needed to make its development a top priority in 1940, but instead they went with other projects (such as von Braun's rockets) and thus lost any chance of having an atomic bomb by the end of the war.

  • @Ranillon They came close enough. It is believed that the only reason they didn't fully develop the bomb was because their own scientists sabotaged the efforts!

  • @borgduck Heisenberg, the lead German nuclear scientist, claimed this after the war, but this is generally considered to be an after-the-event convenient "reinterpretation" meant to make him look better to the Allies and history in general. In reality, his "sabotage" was likely more just errors on his part. For example, he grossly over-estimated how much nuclear material was needed to make a bomb, a miscalculation that made A-bomb development look harder than it was (and it was already hard!).

  • @Ranillon Well, the German (Nazis) scientists certainly helped towards America being the first to land on the Moon! And what about the V2 rockets, or Doodlebubs as the Londoners who were Blitzed by these "robots" called them?

  • @borgduck Oops! Bloody typo! Doodlebugs.

  • @borgduck The V2 was certainly an advanced design ahead of anything the allies had, but without a powerful enough warhead (that is, without an a-bomb) it was nearly worthless. In fact, it just made for an insanely expensive way to drop less than 1% of effect of the allied bombing campaign on Germany. So, in that sense it was perhaps WORSE than useless (and thus a good thing for the allies). Germany would have been better off spending the time and money on more conventional weapons like tanks.

  • @Ranillon Well, Hitler was never the great military stratagist.

  • @Ranillon Even then, remember the fact that the allies, even by 19422 had tanks capable of destroying Germany's. The Sherman M4A1 armed with a 76mm M1 gun would soon slaughter all Nazi tanks, including the Panther. With HVAP (given mostly to the M-18 Hell Cats) these weapons could wipe out Panthers at 1,600 meters. As for the V2? Create a nuclear warhead and launch it on England.

  • @Tyco200 you totaly fogot about the king tiger,and by the time the us even had an improvment on tanks,gearman engineering was too far advanced and way ahead of its time

  • @Ranillon Also note the fact that the only tank capable of saving the Reich was the highly mobile, excellent mobility/reliability and easily produced Panther 3s as Stugs and Panzer IVs. They were good tanks - not shitty developed failures like the Tiger or Konigstiger....

  • @Tyco200 I completely agree with your points

  • @MrMugg In the begining they talk about both country's having nuke's. hence the cold war. The regime toppled much like communism in the end.............

  • 2010:with The Third Reich now in the distant past, it is true that the ripple effect of ita presence is still being felt in world events. This film, while an interesting piece of fiction, pales in the true significance that was and still is Nazi Germany. In any case, I believe the world fortunate that The Fuhrer and his chiefs died or were captured. If they had not, I shudder to think of the ramifications on world history.

    All in all though, an entertaining film. Thanks, Hellwrath!

  • At the end of the book he finds the brick foundations of Auschwitz ...they coulda done mor research for this movie.

  • i will always respect Germany for coming close to taking over the world, as i would of any other nation, i can't wait for the day the middle eastern countries like iraq and afghistan take over the world, and muslims are already taking over europe by out breading europeans, i hope iraq gains nuclear power, that will make you wish all you whites that Adolf Hitler had won, but i guess we will have to wait and find out, enjoy the crap world that's being created because hitler lost

  • The really sad thing is that this movie does, in no way, give any justice to the brilliant book that it's based on.............

  • Even without the US Germany wouldve won!!! They now only had one front!

  • i think 2nd world war is a never ending war, because of a new type of war overcoming, cold war, and right now the war is here, economic way, globalisation, mass media... well maybe is just a perspective from my own geografic situation...

  • it would be hard to find a culture not marred by the perpetration of genocide. we all just like to put our stigmas on the germans, considering all the other nations involved and russias pogroms 30 years before. in the sense of the holocaust it was your friendly christian values which gave it merit the blood libel past down through history. but hey , the jews worship a book which glorifies their own genocidal practices on the amalekites and canaanites . and what are the israelis doing today.

  • stupid kid

  • An interesting movie. In response to Iron 1871, no, you nor any other person is not responsible for anything they personally did not do. I am from the South, and while we do not pay taxes, we have been penalized in a large degree for simply declaring our independence. The pro-Southern view is not looked at in a positive light, as the victors write history. I am by no means a Nazi or anything like that. Every country has had genocide in its past- the USSR, Japan in China, Turkey with the Armenian

  • @dandebonaire Its very important that nobody has the right to connect all Germans directly with the Nazi crime.

  • people, the US with its aboriginal people, and we could continue on in this vein for ever and ever. It is human nature to kill, whether or not it is right or wrong, and the reason Germany is singled out is simply because they went after a group of people that have much political and economic power. I dont think what they did was right. If anything, they should have possibly made the Jews leave the country, much in the way that India and Pakistan seperated.Thisisjustthelateste­xampleofbarbarism.

  • if all guilty parties had been tried,then prescott bush and jo kennedy,to name but two,would have been guilty by association.they made a bunch of cash off the nazi war machine up to '42-bearing in mind pearl harbor was '41....brown harriman (thier company) had to be shut down under the 'trading with the enemy' act..treason! and to hang the guilty was vengence,not democratic justice.i thought only the nazis executed prisoners? hmmm-hypocrisy in my mind.a sorry state of affairs all round methinks

  • @PatrickvonPatey Only the German army signed the capitulation 1945 but not the Reich as whole. Only the German goverment (President Dönitz) were able to sign a state capitulation. He didnt sign. Keitel was the leader of the Wehrmacht who signed only for the German army. Thats why the war ended.

  • Fab film, thanks for uploading m8!

  • This movie just goes to show how pathetic and sick the Hitler regime was. I by no means blame Germany, but I do blame Hitler, and I can imagine what things people would have done to him if he was captured. Hitler had problems, and I can't see how anyone can ever forgive him. I lost family members in the war and the holocaust, all because of a sick person that magically came to power...

  • Remember out there the germans today are not to blame for what generations did before them. Many germans didnt want the nazy regime, but had to follow orders and pretend they liked it, or else they would be put in jail as a traitor. To blame the germans today for what they did at that time during the world war ll is totally insane. We must all fight against tendency that has the face of nazism or similar system that wants to suppress people. Scientology is a system with similar tendency.

  • @PatrickvonPatey -- Still, Patrick, they knew they were supporting someone who was fueled by hate. And hate leads to destruction, everyone knows.

  • wo america,britain could be defended but could not win the war with the master of western europe.

    pearl harbour change all that,us declared war with japan n germany declared war with america thinking that the russia bear has been subdued so to speak.

  • Hitler had a valid point when he said, " A young Frauline with a baby, brings a wheelbarrow full of Deutchmarks, to buy 1 loaf of bread. Someome dumps the money and steals the Wheelbarrow". He was right, the Depression took Germany very hard, we could blame all this on greed in the stock-markets of America in the 20's. BUT BLAME IS USELESS, we fight together from now on.

  • 60% of Germans believe to be superior to other nations

    even nowdays

  • @Ssendecki you are stupid as hell lol

  • aryan?

  • @Ssendecki so what is wrong with that? everybody in the world think they are superior to others. if savages in jungles didnt think they were superior to Germans they would follow civilization. everyone is proud of their idiocy, but it takes lot of fortune to be someone like a German who has made history as well as humanity.

  • @Ssendecki Of course they have every right. Especially after that german man ate a person over the internet and told the judge he was just fu;fi;lling his creative desires

    And the judge agreed

  • i am so glad it didn't came this far

  • @EasterBunnySucks I respect Hitler but I dont believe that German people would say Hail Hitler all their lives when he is just a millitary poet who tells people what to do with his orator talents. The truth is that if Hitler show this pride with all beautiful flags, soon there will be people jelous, why would a brilliant army commander work under a dictator? this is why Hitler lost, I respect Hitler for his courage and vigor, he became something in his life and that is by hardship.

  • The Russians have been losing this war since 1941 and just 'pull through'? After 23 years? Why didn't that happen to Germany in 1944 in fact?

  • The United States Air Force had a nuclear bombing plan for Berlin If the bomb was ready on time. But the Russians had advanced too far into Germany for its use. If the Germans had held the Soviets at the Order River longer, say into August, than the Americans could had wiped Berlin from the map.

    The bomb was not a racist weapon, any many have said. The U.S. was perfectly willing to use it on Germans and Italians as on the Japanese.

    Anything to save U.S lives and end the war.

  • I still don't understand how Hitler's Reich collapsed in the movie's end. Germania had a perfectly stable situation. The Holocaust images would just lower the Us's willingness to make an Alliance. With Russia losing the war, the Reich would dominate probably 2/3 of the world, with so much valuable uranium. If there would be a war, Germania would win. Yes, I know I'm gong into huge depth of the movie.

  • Yes, I agree with you. Germany could always come up with some clever reason for why March- a bitter traitor to his country with a dead-ended career, in my book- was a bloody liar. And even if the US believed everything he and Maguire told them, that wouldn't change the fact that a 75-year old Hitler reigned supreme over Germany and Europe.

  • @YaYzIwInZ Yeah, it feels like a bit too much of a neat ending really, doesn't it?

  • if just realized something if the USA had the nuke since before the war ended and it worked on japan... wouldn't they have just used it on Berlin and called it a day?

  • @HADESRULE44

    The Nazis had one too, according to this chronology.

  • well they had to be in range to drop it....and in the book england was controlled by Germany

  • Apparently, the Nazis Had one as well. We nuked Berlin, they would have nuked London, or tried for NYC according to the book.

  • @HADESRULE44

    Because they didn´t need to nuke germany... during this phase of the war, germanys cities were mostly ruins, where the use of a nuke would have been pure decoration. What they needed was a way to shock Japan, a country that wasn´t totally destroyed by war and gave good possibilities to set an example.