Nice pull and typical for a stock 2010 GT500, those stating its inflated are wrong, case closed. With a 2.59in. pulley, better CAI and solid tune these cars can lay down 560+ rwhp and same for torque, my 2010 with the aforementioned laid down 566rwhp and 564 rwtq, on a mustang dyno no less. The 2010's have additional upgrades over the previous generation, most significantly a larger dual clutch set up and revised suspension. With mods these cars are absolute beasts!
I'm sure the dyno places are thrilled when they get a powerful motor in. Imagine running a million Hondas who's owners "need their numbers" so they can show off to their friends. And then a beauty like this shows up. I'm talking about the regular shops, might not pertain to this one.
I LOVE looking back at these old videos seeing the super inflated dyno numbers you guys come up with. That car will usually run about 450rwhp on a dynojet in any weather. 511rwhp is closer to pulley/cai/tune numbers. What a bunch of bullshit.
@LMBC6Brian so this car is losing almost 100hp from drivetrain losses? are you on crack or just a dumbass? a pulley,cai,tune 2010 gt500 will put hell of alot more then 511rwhp! you dont dick about this car
@braddfordy You fucking dumbass, I own one. I have an 09 GT500. My CAI/pulley/tune car made 535rwhp. But it made 450rwhp with just the car before the mods. The 2010 is nothing more than the 07-09 with a factory CAI. Add the pulley and tune to the 2010 and its the same HP numbers. And those cars dyno in the mod 400s pal. Check out real dyno runs, not these fake magazine ones. Fucking moron.
@LMBC6Brian youre the moron, theyre using the KR drivetrain which is a slightly more agressive tune, less restrictive exhaust and an intake, these "fake" magazine ones are done on a cold engine, with a hot engine youre looking at around 480rwhp, pulley, full intake and exhaust and these cars have done high 500rwhp.....cmon mate, the proof is right there in the video
@ADD8oi biggest bunch of bullshit. There is no such thing as a "KR" drive train. The KR had a factory CAI, slightly different tune and different mufflers. There is no difference here. Again, this car with the same mods will be the same as an 07 GT500. The other difference I forgot were knock sensors on the new car. Otherwise, its the same, and these numbers are so inflated it sick.
@LMBC6Brian lmao the KR had a different setup than the 07-09 GT500, sure same base block, same blower, however you have the less restrictive exhaust and intake with an agressive engine tune, same as the 2010s, literally every single tester got the same results with a cold engine, there were even a couple at the speed shop i got my turbos done that were running between 500-520rwhp on cold engines, and 07 GT500 makes roughly 450rwhp, the KR will lay down anywhere from 480-510rwhp
@LMBC6Brian wow you are really a stupid fuck so now a 07-09 will put the same HP as a 2010 gt500? You don't own a gt500 and if you do you should get rid of it!
I just bought an 01 v6 turbo mustang bored to a 4.3, built, turbo'd with a built t5 and dyno'd at 500 hp and 500 tq to the rear wheels. I was wondering how a higher displacement engine that is also boosted makes less tq is that just because of the way it is set up or what? my first Mustang so I am curious about everything and trying to learn all I can.
you can make any dyno read any number. They all read different. put this same car on another dyno and it may read 450hp or it may read 600hp... Take these numbers with a grain of salt...
@MattToppan52 Both are Ford modular series engines, both 5.4 Liters, both have 4 valves per cylinder, both are aluminium blocks, both have twin-screw roots-type superchargers, and both were even made in the same plant? Sure there are differences, but the two are pretty similar....
@iamidiotic wrong,wrong,wrong! gt500 didnt come with a twinscrew and the video car is a 2010 with a iron block, these motors are not really as close as some think! wet sump vs dry sump oiling systems,cams, and the fgt heads are a tad bit bigger
@braddfordy what I was trying to prove is that these engines are similar and based on the same architecture, where-as this other guy says they are completely different.
When I lived in Baltimore, the people at the emissions place use to fight over who got to put my old mustang on the dyno to do the emissions...I'd watch there face and see that big shit eating grin appear!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
its so ugly, it has an annoying sound, and its just no good, If your going to spend all of that money to buy expensive, fast cars, buy corvette or a viper!
@novicharged306 sure but if you take a mustang gt and give it a twin turbo thats what this is. and if you take an evo and put in a twin turbo its the same thing. so in essence, this isnt even really stock, its like a reproduction.
they need to reduce size of mustang in next type. they look nice but they are too bulky. If they reduce size and weight it could be best sport car for that amount money in any book.
@93549john1 ok, i know your comment is like from a year ago, but can you image the 2013 gt500. its getting redone with a bigger blower and a 5.8l engine, and is suppost to push out about 600-650hp. if it can hook up with all that power, i think it can run with a fricken vet, since the boss 302 with 444hp runs 0-60 in 3.9 off of several magazines and fords website
i know this may be a late response but that was not a 2010 gt500 and the car put down exactly what it wa suppose to to the wheels those guys r critical to us cars check out the 2011 version all alum motor and 550 hp
Problem with Top Gear is they're biased. They were making fun of our culture in that episode just as we haze them about the revolution. I don't consider Top Gear when I go shopping.
The 500 hp was rated at crank. Since about 15% is lost, they only got 450 rwhp, which isn't too bad considering 500hp - 15% = 425 rwhp. This one is rated at 540 hp from the factory, but it seems to be under rated.
Let me clarify, Ford rated the 500 hp at crank, not the wheels. So, when it gets 500 hp at the crank and approximately 15% of power is loss through the drivetrain (which is average) then you should expect about 425 rwhp. Rear wheel horsepower , or rwhp, is what you measure at a dyno like the one you see here, horsepower is measured with the engine out of the car, like you see in the 2011 Ford Mustang 5.0 V8 Dyno video.
@mikbla92 Yes, all GT500's use a 5.4 V8. I was simply telling people to look up that video so they could see an example of what an engine dyno looks like.
The challenger is a cool car. It looks nice and it comes with 425hp. Give it some credit. I'm with you on the Camaro though, I like the '69 Camaros better.
BAse prices should stay close to what ther are now. Expect anywhere from $2000-$3000 diff. Except if u want even more features, like nav, stereo, back up camera, blind spot alert, upgraded perfomance parts and accsesories
too bad the Ford GT hennessy puts out 1000 at the wheels when on the dyno :( which is better than any crappy ass camaro :( Mustangs will always dominate the muscle car world, camaro's need to learn there place as second runner up.
@sweet00976 too bad the hennessey camaro is a aftermarket tuned car that doesnt have to pass all of the OEM rules. a simple tvs upgrade dont wont void ur warranty will put the gt500 over 600rwhp
I can't stand mustangs honestly. but this thing is beautiful. i love how ford has "retinkered" with the front and rear of the new mustangs. and this car is no exception. great power and beautiful color. just a little outta my price range...
@289pinto he said rice infestation, LOL! but you are very right. The shelby's and Super Sports had stripes, and others as well. The Mach 1 and AAR Cuda had the "black hoods", something the ricers have adopted, and try to call their own.
LOL, and i thought it was stupid comparing the $48k Shelby to the $32k Camaro, hell that guy just compared the $48k Shelby to a million plus Bugatti, hahaha, what a lame ass
Cool thing about the Shelby is affordable supercar performance, not everyone can get their millionair daddy to buy their son or daughter a $300k Lambo or Ferrari, with the Shelby you yourself can buy it, pay for it, and keep up with the best of them, all while not looking like a snobby prick, LOL
@0spaceboy Hahaha turbo CRX, he came up with an uglier car! hahahaha, and he's calling ricer the almighty GT500 a ricer. Poor guy, he must be put to sleep.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this dude make me laugh,cause by 2011 they'll have another camaro ss,and stangs will be out back in there grave bitch.chevy camaro ss all the way.beat a mustang anyday.
Those numbers r pretty stout right from the factory, if they could shed about 500-1000 pounds no one could touch this mustang for the money...... Beautiful ride, nice color
the GT 500 with tires runs 11.7s with stock tires it will not hook up you guys need to read up more! plus be a good idea to go to you local track lol been racing mustangs longtime now have 2 turbo LX's 5.0
stock gt500 run 11;9 on stock tire's,11;5 on m/t tire's this car mid 10 with blower swap,stock ls9 camaro want see 10 sec et the zr1 vette couldn't do it.
"Won't beat the GT500?" The 400 hp Camaro SS is only a tenth of a second slower then the GT500. 12.8 vs 12.9. Yes those are average 1/4 times with both cars running on their O.E.M. tires. And you don't think the new Camaro Z28 with the 550+hp LSA CTS-V motor won't run faster then that? Get a clue! As far as the Corvette being in danger of sales? Our you kidding me? The Corvette is a two seat sports car built for road course use. The C6 Z06&ZR1 have nothing to worry about heavy muscle cars.
EvilxMerlin-I know quite well what the new GT500 is capable of doing in the 1/4 mile with a skilled driver and some good rubber. That said, with the stock O.E.M. tires its mid to high 12's. We are not talking about "glory runs" Were talking "AVERAGES" from a number of sources. Yep, get better rubber and those 1/4 e.t. drop like hell. But on stock tires that just not the case. The Camaro SS comes with some decent rubber and maximize the use of its available power. The GT500 does not.
is the torque curve the derivative of the power curve?
danthemanpatrick 4 weeks ago
And sounds so much better than the New Camaros
03Cobra10thAnnivrsry 1 month ago
I've seen better......
BassLoverDari 2 months ago
Nice pull and typical for a stock 2010 GT500, those stating its inflated are wrong, case closed. With a 2.59in. pulley, better CAI and solid tune these cars can lay down 560+ rwhp and same for torque, my 2010 with the aforementioned laid down 566rwhp and 564 rwtq, on a mustang dyno no less. The 2010's have additional upgrades over the previous generation, most significantly a larger dual clutch set up and revised suspension. With mods these cars are absolute beasts!
4632v 4 months ago
I'm sure the dyno places are thrilled when they get a powerful motor in. Imagine running a million Hondas who's owners "need their numbers" so they can show off to their friends. And then a beauty like this shows up. I'm talking about the regular shops, might not pertain to this one.
OneGuitarGuy 5 months ago
I LOVE looking back at these old videos seeing the super inflated dyno numbers you guys come up with. That car will usually run about 450rwhp on a dynojet in any weather. 511rwhp is closer to pulley/cai/tune numbers. What a bunch of bullshit.
LMBC6Brian 7 months ago
@LMBC6Brian so this car is losing almost 100hp from drivetrain losses? are you on crack or just a dumbass? a pulley,cai,tune 2010 gt500 will put hell of alot more then 511rwhp! you dont dick about this car
braddfordy 7 months ago
@braddfordy You fucking dumbass, I own one. I have an 09 GT500. My CAI/pulley/tune car made 535rwhp. But it made 450rwhp with just the car before the mods. The 2010 is nothing more than the 07-09 with a factory CAI. Add the pulley and tune to the 2010 and its the same HP numbers. And those cars dyno in the mod 400s pal. Check out real dyno runs, not these fake magazine ones. Fucking moron.
LMBC6Brian 7 months ago
@LMBC6Brian youre the moron, theyre using the KR drivetrain which is a slightly more agressive tune, less restrictive exhaust and an intake, these "fake" magazine ones are done on a cold engine, with a hot engine youre looking at around 480rwhp, pulley, full intake and exhaust and these cars have done high 500rwhp.....cmon mate, the proof is right there in the video
ADD8oi 7 months ago
@ADD8oi biggest bunch of bullshit. There is no such thing as a "KR" drive train. The KR had a factory CAI, slightly different tune and different mufflers. There is no difference here. Again, this car with the same mods will be the same as an 07 GT500. The other difference I forgot were knock sensors on the new car. Otherwise, its the same, and these numbers are so inflated it sick.
LMBC6Brian 7 months ago
@LMBC6Brian lmao the KR had a different setup than the 07-09 GT500, sure same base block, same blower, however you have the less restrictive exhaust and intake with an agressive engine tune, same as the 2010s, literally every single tester got the same results with a cold engine, there were even a couple at the speed shop i got my turbos done that were running between 500-520rwhp on cold engines, and 07 GT500 makes roughly 450rwhp, the KR will lay down anywhere from 480-510rwhp
ADD8oi 7 months ago
@LMBC6Brian wow you are really a stupid fuck so now a 07-09 will put the same HP as a 2010 gt500? You don't own a gt500 and if you do you should get rid of it!
braddfordy 6 months ago
...and that's before it ate a few civics for breakfast
TheReservoirTip 7 months ago 7
@TheReservoirTip and a couple camaros for lunch
BAUERHOCKEY17 7 months ago
Wow, that much power so it must be a great car. Simple fact.
clearlogicify 8 months ago
I just bought an 01 v6 turbo mustang bored to a 4.3, built, turbo'd with a built t5 and dyno'd at 500 hp and 500 tq to the rear wheels. I was wondering how a higher displacement engine that is also boosted makes less tq is that just because of the way it is set up or what? my first Mustang so I am curious about everything and trying to learn all I can.
StatusElite01 9 months ago
@Marshmallowrex What do you mean by "ricer"..?
undeadkillers 1 year ago
you can make any dyno read any number. They all read different. put this same car on another dyno and it may read 450hp or it may read 600hp... Take these numbers with a grain of salt...
cdoliver 1 year ago
thats a ford gt engine for u.
Rsanson21 1 year ago
@Rsanson21 ford gt engine and Shelby gt500 engine are 2 completely different engine bro....
MattToppan52 10 months ago
@MattToppan52 Both are Ford modular series engines, both 5.4 Liters, both have 4 valves per cylinder, both are aluminium blocks, both have twin-screw roots-type superchargers, and both were even made in the same plant? Sure there are differences, but the two are pretty similar....
iamidiotic 10 months ago
@iamidiotic wrong,wrong,wrong! gt500 didnt come with a twinscrew and the video car is a 2010 with a iron block, these motors are not really as close as some think! wet sump vs dry sump oiling systems,cams, and the fgt heads are a tad bit bigger
braddfordy 7 months ago
@braddfordy what I was trying to prove is that these engines are similar and based on the same architecture, where-as this other guy says they are completely different.
iamidiotic 7 months ago
@MattToppan52 actually, your the one thats wrong "bro" the GT500 and GT's engines are based on the same layout.
123tyler1234 7 months ago
thats the best song ive heard all day. LOL!!!!! 12 dislikes. must be camaro owners upset because they got beat by one of these machines
chaosad09 1 year ago
Doesnt sound like he took it to 6.2k
jsn0x 1 year ago
holy shit i tought this was an air raid siren lol
shant151 1 year ago
never liked mustang,, but i do want that engine....
dtsn0703 1 year ago
wow!!!
kuhndog52 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice but not quite as nice as the Hennessey Camaros
CamaRO9923 1 year ago
@CamaRO9923 try a super snake
Storm7289 1 year ago 3
@CamaRO9923 yeah but it will rape an ss, this is an in house svt car, yeah a super snake vs a hennessey would be a far race
suepsetts 1 year ago
ooohh myy god the engine noise, i luv it!! :D
marcz4100 1 year ago
Damnnnn, that intake is the size of Shaq feet.
jrider41023 1 year ago
wow i hate mustangs but. thats kinda good i have to give it to ford for this one
XYLANISEQUALTONYHM 1 year ago
i think you can squeeze just a little bit more torque out of it but other than that it is a GREAT CAR!!!!
xmegapwnx 1 year ago
O cool. ill check that out
jnormous1000 1 year ago
ford should remake the boss 302
jnormous1000 1 year ago
@jnormous1000 they did
bsk315 1 year ago
@jnormous1000 they did type in 2011 boss mustang
bsk315 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LEARN THE INSIDER SECRETS OF THE SUPER WEALTHY !!!
30billionaireschangingtheworld dot kom
Steventk26 1 year ago
When I lived in Baltimore, the people at the emissions place use to fight over who got to put my old mustang on the dyno to do the emissions...I'd watch there face and see that big shit eating grin appear!
DCNCIDER 1 year ago
Damn, what a beautiful piece of automotive engineer. I love the sound of the supercharger at high RPM's. 100% American Muscle.
AntonioMontana0 1 year ago
I hate ever saying it can't compare to the ss. That's such a lie
zalenski9 1 year ago
@zalenski9 Hey guy this video is not about the Cramparo SS. It is about the GT500 and how it is an amazing factory vehicle. FORD.
shoDOHC 1 year ago 4
Its nice but it cannot compare to the Camaro SS HPE500 by Hennessey...
Killsuit71 1 year ago
@Killsuit71 lets see a aftermarket tuner car vs a bone stock car.
braddfordy 1 year ago
@Killsuit71 yea cause thats an extreme tuner car. the hennessey cant compare to a tuned cobra, the super snake. so...
V12Carlucci 1 year ago
GO MUSTANG
ookiss00 1 year ago
the blue reminds me a porto-potty, what the hell.
vo7tage 1 year ago 4
does shelbys actully come from the factory to the dealership ready to race
xlt42 1 year ago
great engine, too bad most of that power goes up in smoke off the line.
nmac121 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
its so ugly, it has an annoying sound, and its just no good, If your going to spend all of that money to buy expensive, fast cars, buy corvette or a viper!
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
@Motorfordtoyota Viper engines have the highest stock failure rate of any oem engine (pre 09) and vettes are boring and everywhere
slingblade1991 1 year ago
i have a 2008 shelby gt 500 and all i did was add a cold air intake and get the chip configured and now it has 510 hp at the wheels
carsgirls7685 1 year ago
this is stock, your evo is not, get a clue
novicharged306 1 year ago 10
@novicharged306 sure but if you take a mustang gt and give it a twin turbo thats what this is. and if you take an evo and put in a twin turbo its the same thing. so in essence, this isnt even really stock, its like a reproduction.
goo5976 2 months ago
thats all it makes my evo make way more but i still like this car
MrBOSS626 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That's one Smokin Stang!!
Join us at SmokinStangs dotcom
SmokinStangs 1 year ago
damn 510,looks like actual crank is more towards the 600 hp range..sweet
wellshii 1 year ago 4
Yea 601HP not shabby.. thought they put down 490wHP.. 511wHP thats sweet..
IXGQ4LifeXI 1 year ago
Dude 511 rwhp = about 588 hp to the crank. that a powerful engine in anyone book.......................
93549john1 2 years ago 46
@93549john1
too bad its not the supersnake or kenne bell version.
rolltideroll14 2 years ago
its 601HP which yes is a powerful engine..
IXGQ4LifeXI 1 year ago
@93549john1
they need to reduce size of mustang in next type. they look nice but they are too bulky. If they reduce size and weight it could be best sport car for that amount money in any book.
KarelYalek 1 year ago 2
@KarelYalek Agreed, bring back the size of the Foxbody, and @ 3,200lbs. for the GT, and we'd have a real hot car on our hands for not a lot of money.
SpeedingStudent 1 year ago
@93549john1 Thats actually 601hp to the crank with a 15% drivetrain loss. 15% is conservative through that 6 speed.
JarrodGT 1 year ago
@93549john1 F/I the actual engine doesn't put that down by itself.
Cripton805 8 months ago
@93549john1 ok, i know your comment is like from a year ago, but can you image the 2013 gt500. its getting redone with a bigger blower and a 5.8l engine, and is suppost to push out about 600-650hp. if it can hook up with all that power, i think it can run with a fricken vet, since the boss 302 with 444hp runs 0-60 in 3.9 off of several magazines and fords website
paladain55 8 months ago
@93549john1 its supercharged........
blunted12 8 months ago
Good to see the new gt500 actually has 500+ hp, especially after watching the top gear episode where they found out theirs had only about 450hp.
g0ing2n0where 2 years ago
@g0ing2n0where factory rates power at the crank not the wheels like the dyno measures
keotafango 2 years ago 11
@g0ing2n0where
'10 supersnake has 750+ hp
rolltideroll14 2 years ago
i know this may be a late response but that was not a 2010 gt500 and the car put down exactly what it wa suppose to to the wheels those guys r critical to us cars check out the 2011 version all alum motor and 550 hp
havokauto 1 year ago
that WAS 2010, look at the tail lights, bro.
wigglezdamonsta 1 year ago 2
Problem with Top Gear is they're biased. They were making fun of our culture in that episode just as we haze them about the revolution. I don't consider Top Gear when I go shopping.
shorty6388 1 year ago 3
The 500 hp was rated at crank. Since about 15% is lost, they only got 450 rwhp, which isn't too bad considering 500hp - 15% = 425 rwhp. This one is rated at 540 hp from the factory, but it seems to be under rated.
dodge69874 1 year ago
its at the wheels u moron
puppi350 1 year ago
Let me clarify, Ford rated the 500 hp at crank, not the wheels. So, when it gets 500 hp at the crank and approximately 15% of power is loss through the drivetrain (which is average) then you should expect about 425 rwhp. Rear wheel horsepower , or rwhp, is what you measure at a dyno like the one you see here, horsepower is measured with the engine out of the car, like you see in the 2011 Ford Mustang 5.0 V8 Dyno video.
dodge69874 1 year ago
@dodge69874
it's 5.4 i think :P
mikbla92 1 year ago
@mikbla92 Yes, all GT500's use a 5.4 V8. I was simply telling people to look up that video so they could see an example of what an engine dyno looks like.
dodge69874 1 year ago
@g0ing2n0where The 500 in the GT500 doesnt even stand for the horsepwer.
drummer835 1 year ago
stop comparing this to your hennessey bullshit. that fucker competes with the super snake
Sforschondetta 2 years ago 3
Sounds just as nice as my 07 Shelby....I'm getting one of these in April, same color
Alex2911 2 years ago
hmm, i heard the 2011 GT500's are going to be twin turbo stock. :D
karbine409 2 years ago
no turbo in this? lame!!
Auronfan 2 years ago
No turbo... Yes Supercharger! Not lame.
worldpc 2 years ago 3
ricer
0spaceboy 2 years ago
Yah, not only that, but the retard doesn't know that both cars are in completely different classes. Shelby: muscle Veyron: exotic
residentapple 2 years ago
this car is the best...
the only problem it has , its a back lights... the old style was better !!
EXiS091 2 years ago
now thats some muscle for ya right there.
eb1zzle 2 years ago 4
in my country, that mustang is $32 000
WatchMeGo99 2 years ago
511hp at the wheels, It should be called a GT550. :)
Zsword92 2 years ago 4
Tax money beggin trash.
t3523 2 years ago
holy crap, mustang has always been the best, fuck the camaro and the challenger
residentapple 2 years ago 2
The challenger is a cool car. It looks nice and it comes with 425hp. Give it some credit. I'm with you on the Camaro though, I like the '69 Camaros better.
Adrenalinex03 2 years ago
too bad the camaro hennessey puts out 550 at the wheels when on the dyno :(
sweet00976 2 years ago
@sweet00976 ROFL.. that car also cost a lot more than a 40k Cobra too..
H0SS302 2 years ago
yeah it does...but for 550 hp I would expect it to :(
sweet00976 2 years ago
MSRP on a cobra is $50,895 not 40k
ProCharggedGTO 2 years ago
BAse prices should stay close to what ther are now. Expect anywhere from $2000-$3000 diff. Except if u want even more features, like nav, stereo, back up camera, blind spot alert, upgraded perfomance parts and accsesories
05gt5 1 year ago
too bad the Ford GT hennessy puts out 1000 at the wheels when on the dyno :( which is better than any crappy ass camaro :( Mustangs will always dominate the muscle car world, camaro's need to learn there place as second runner up.
xxnickiskewlxx 2 years ago
@sweet00976 too bad the hennessey camaro is a aftermarket tuned car that doesnt have to pass all of the OEM rules. a simple tvs upgrade dont wont void ur warranty will put the gt500 over 600rwhp
braddfordy 2 years ago
dont wont void? get back in that trailer boy!
sweet00976 2 years ago
@sweet00976 i would but you already moved in
braddfordy 2 years ago
Im half black half nigger fool!
sweet00976 2 years ago
@sweet00976 niggers live in trailers too!
braddfordy 2 years ago
But im also part white part cracker and part beaner part wetback...along with part italian part pizza
sweet00976 2 years ago
@sweet00976 its all good ,but did you leave anything out?
braddfordy 2 years ago
I think thats about it....
sweet00976 2 years ago
@sweet00976
because that makes sense.
rolltideroll14 2 years ago
I would rip on this car all day long just to hear that SC whine!
112namrepus 2 years ago
I can't stand mustangs honestly. but this thing is beautiful. i love how ford has "retinkered" with the front and rear of the new mustangs. and this car is no exception. great power and beautiful color. just a little outta my price range...
nycclaye 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im willing to bet that this will come with a 100 grand price tag
bigrig243 2 years ago
well your wrong its half that
1gt289 2 years ago
love that color, had grabber blue on my 69 mach 1
86T66T123 2 years ago 5
wat about hennesy ford gt.... ssc aero tt is a shelby
botsnrunescape 2 years ago
different Shelby no relation.
mbsnyderc 2 years ago
@botsnrunescape the ssc aero is not the same shelby that works with ford fyi
braddfordy 2 years ago
Does anyone know the official name for that blue?
anthonyrocksworldz 2 years ago
Grabber Blue
kza7 2 years ago
grabber blue
honkzonk 2 years ago
Holy hell.
TheKoreanX 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bahahaha ricer stripe lololololol ford sucks
0spaceboy 2 years ago
You know nothing, domestic muscle cars had stripes in the 60's, before the rice infestation.
289pinto 2 years ago 40
@289pinto he said rice infestation, LOL! but you are very right. The shelby's and Super Sports had stripes, and others as well. The Mach 1 and AAR Cuda had the "black hoods", something the ricers have adopted, and try to call their own.
NedacFilms 2 years ago
LOL, and i thought it was stupid comparing the $48k Shelby to the $32k Camaro, hell that guy just compared the $48k Shelby to a million plus Bugatti, hahaha, what a lame ass
Cool thing about the Shelby is affordable supercar performance, not everyone can get their millionair daddy to buy their son or daughter a $300k Lambo or Ferrari, with the Shelby you yourself can buy it, pay for it, and keep up with the best of them, all while not looking like a snobby prick, LOL
Ratmouth66 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bugatti veyron = kicka the fucking balls of the shelby
LegendaryGuitarHero3 2 years ago
That's the dumbest comparison i ever heard/seen
Karnage542 2 years ago 3
No shit dumbass....thats a Million dollar car! wtf?
UnionPacificRules 2 years ago 3
The SSC Ultimate Aero (American) Kicks balls out of veyron HAHA!
24ecko 2 years ago
yea but its only by a couple mph diff
doomboy829 2 years ago
it could now do 273, and it accelerates way faster
EatmyDust1311 2 years ago
yes for an unexperenced person it may, but if thats the case then its like comparing a 2009 Chevy Corvette to a Geo Metro.
theres only a handfull of different cars that can outmach the Veyron lets name them
1st the SSC Ultimate Aero
2ed is the Hennessys Viper
3ed is the Hennessys Corvette
now if you wanna go 200+mph then dont be a dumbass and get a Veyron (1.6 million) go for the STOCK 611HP 09 Chevy Corvette (110K)
doomboy829 2 years ago
ricer lolololololol
0spaceboy 2 years ago
so you have a gt500 ? i bet that you have a civic
R33skylineR33 2 years ago 2
no i don't i have a turbo crx
0spaceboy 2 years ago
@0spaceboy Hahaha turbo CRX, he came up with an uglier car! hahahaha, and he's calling ricer the almighty GT500 a ricer. Poor guy, he must be put to sleep.
AntonioMontana0 1 year ago
Imagine if that thing broke and it just took off LMAO
lilplaya205 2 years ago
Mustang For Life <3 xD
TheMonkeypack 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im sorry but to me a camaro would spank a ford any day and i dont care what motor it has in it when u hear a camaro thats all i need
kevinwhite0485 2 years ago
What are you smoking?
Thats all I am going to ask, review your statement and you will know what i mean.
DABOYZinc 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this dude make me laugh,cause by 2011 they'll have another camaro ss,and stangs will be out back in there grave bitch.chevy camaro ss all the way.beat a mustang anyday.
janisandrandy 2 years ago
? The Camaro SS for 2011 isn't changing, at all, other than the addition of a Convertable.
For the smack talking, you sure don't keep up with the times...
EvilxMerlin 2 years ago 3
When 2011 Mustangs come out, Camaro will be taking Dirt Naps again!!!!
93SuperChargedStang 2 years ago 12
Yep I cant wait....
venomfastback 2 years ago
saw one of these on the road the other day. freakin' sweet.
LWRCftw 2 years ago 2
God these car's are sick. I want a red one with black stripes with a Super Snake package.
dodge69874 2 years ago 3
kenne bell 2.8 mammoth and headers dyno and bigger heat pump and injectors and clicks with a new aluminum driveshaft etc..
kief4diamonds 2 years ago
why can't camaro fans say gt500,only thing i hear is gt,listen gt500-gt500-gt500!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
93549john1 2 years ago 3
Those numbers r pretty stout right from the factory, if they could shed about 500-1000 pounds no one could touch this mustang for the money...... Beautiful ride, nice color
stetchlexus 2 years ago 4
IM GETTING THAT CAR!
crysisman14 2 years ago 2
this is creasy
misteryeison 2 years ago
the GT 500 with tires runs 11.7s with stock tires it will not hook up you guys need to read up more! plus be a good idea to go to you local track lol been racing mustangs longtime now have 2 turbo LX's 5.0
ninjazx14rblack 2 years ago
mm another thing, sorry 4 my english if it`s bad , ...
saulk 2 years ago
Sounds like sex.
DrPeeper101 2 years ago
damn 511whp is like 600hp
Rsanson21 2 years ago
Hey! I know those tail lights! they came off one of my presses at Valeo-Sylvanie in Indiana ^_^
KeairaElisabeth 2 years ago
stock gt500 run 11;9 on stock tire's,11;5 on m/t tire's this car mid 10 with blower swap,stock ls9 camaro want see 10 sec et the zr1 vette couldn't do it.
93549john1 2 years ago
that is true the GT500 does the 1/4mile in 11.9@120!!!only someone stupid would think around 12.8!!
drfaticus 2 years ago
yup, the 03 04 Cobras ran low 12s.
93SuperChargedStang 2 years ago
thats right,and the 2010 shelby does 11.9@120!!!
drfaticus 2 years ago
No, they typically ran 12.5-12.7's at 112-113. I miss my 2004.
EvilxMerlin 2 years ago
ahhhh its sadam in the front seat
deathmetal1786 2 years ago
i saw same coler back here in kuwait :P
mejawmeyaw 2 years ago
To me this is gonna be the best Mustang built in a REAL long time.
eatoutlots 2 years ago 2
Check out the 2010 GT500 KR... 740 HP...
EvilxMerlin 2 years ago
Is it on here?
eatoutlots 2 years ago
that's bull thanks for wasting my time lol..
BSbrian 2 years ago
What is bullshit? The Camaro? Yep, totally agree.
EvilxMerlin 2 years ago 3
I totally agree too
BSbrian 2 years ago
Breaking news 9/21/09: Motor Trend is posting news that the new Camaro Z28 is a go for production for 2011 with the 550+ hp LSA S.C. CTS-V motor.
jgtemplars 2 years ago
And it still won't beat the GT500. Chevy will not risk canabalizing Corvette sales.
EvilxMerlin 2 years ago
"Won't beat the GT500?" The 400 hp Camaro SS is only a tenth of a second slower then the GT500. 12.8 vs 12.9. Yes those are average 1/4 times with both cars running on their O.E.M. tires. And you don't think the new Camaro Z28 with the 550+hp LSA CTS-V motor won't run faster then that? Get a clue! As far as the Corvette being in danger of sales? Our you kidding me? The Corvette is a two seat sports car built for road course use. The C6 Z06&ZR1 have nothing to worry about heavy muscle cars.
jgtemplars 2 years ago
You need to stop listening to magazine reviews of the GT500 at go to the track more often...
EvilxMerlin 2 years ago
EvilxMerlin-I know quite well what the new GT500 is capable of doing in the 1/4 mile with a skilled driver and some good rubber. That said, with the stock O.E.M. tires its mid to high 12's. We are not talking about "glory runs" Were talking "AVERAGES" from a number of sources. Yep, get better rubber and those 1/4 e.t. drop like hell. But on stock tires that just not the case. The Camaro SS comes with some decent rubber and maximize the use of its available power. The GT500 does not.
jgtemplars 2 years ago
last time i checked they upgraded the GT500 2010 retail tires to good year eagle1 supercar tires.
magicalpoop 2 years ago
dude the mustang gt is almost faster then the camaro SS wtf are u talking about man....
nickoberer 2 years ago
Um .5-.7 seconds slower than the Camaro SS/2 isn't almost faster.
Not like it matters much the 2011 Mustang GT is going to embarrass the hell outta the 2011 Camaro SS.
EvilxMerlin 2 years ago 3