Even all these "experts" who criticize each other have no idea at all of what happened with these creatures. They only have bones and their big Steven Spielberg imagination to brag about stuff because they have their PhDs. Paleontologists are like Teologists: the have a "science" built up on beliefs more than facts.
And the poeple here is even worse, because at least they have a PhD on something that they studied.
You guys know only Hollywood crap. So STFU. Talk about football or baseball.
I remember growing up watching this at early 2001. Looking back at it as an adult, wow do I real retarded just for glancing at it too long. This really makes zero sense and as a kid, I didn't even noticed such dramatic lacks of consistencies with excruciatingly bad info. This wasn't even a good documentary series to begin with and we are all aware of the fact it was forcefully canceled half way because of such debacles. But, 2001 was a very long time ago.
I remember growing up watching this at early 2001. Looking back at it as an adult, wow do I real retarded just for glancing at it too long. This really makes zero sense and as a kid, I didn't even noticed such dramatic lacks of consistencies with excruciatingly bad info. This wasn't even a good documentary series to begin with and we are all aware of the fact it was forcefully canceled half way because of such debacles. But, 2001 was a very long time ago.
It's staggeringly alarming the amount of gullible kids who believe whatever terrible illogical 10 year old documentary tells them without question nor the intellect or education to differentiate realism and dramatic laws of physics breaking assumptions basted on nothing but blatant opinion that has zero evidence to even slightly prove it and is entirely contradictive to itself...
It's a testament to the lack of education in our planet's civilization -_-
It's staggeringly alarming the amount of gullible kids who believe whatever terrible illogical 10 year old documentary tells them without question nor the intellect or education to differentiate realism and dramatic laws of physics breaking assumptions based on nothing but blatant opinion that has zero evidence to even slightly prove it and is entirely contradictive to itself...
It's a testament to the lack of education in our planet's civilization -_-
It's staggeringly alarming the amount of gullible kids who believe whatever terrible illogical 10 year old documentary tells them without question nor the intellect or education to differentiate realism and dramatic laws of physics breaking assumptions basted on nothing but blatant opinion that has zero evidence to even slightly prove it and is entirely contradictive to itself...
It's a testament to the lack of education in our planet's civilization -_-
@daverowbotham Wow, I didn't even noticed but that was because of this. Sorry, I was typing a bit too fast and didn't even notice such a small insignificant errors.
Also, it's "delicious" It's nice to see you are very comfortable with your fetishes to masturbate to comments but that was more than I needed to know.It scares me that there are people who have such, "conditions".
@elmersglue82 you're not clever enough to masterbate to, sorry, people who can't spell don't do it for me ^.^
Also the correct grammar would be "a small insignificant error" nor "errors" ;)
So, looks like you are the one needing educating. ( hint: the moral of the story is when ranting about the "state of education today" make sure your rant is correctly spelled and punctuated or you risk looking like an ass -- which you did ;) .
@daverowbotham Posting a comment with a single small error as a YouTube comment is not an indicator of how intelligent a person is. It's just a YouTube video, not a college exam.The fact that you actually believe that's the case only shows such processing debacles and actually a low intellect on your part rather than my own.
Lesson of today: Your claims are ironic as for they are shrouded in hypocrisy. Might want to think about that.
@elmersglue82 I totally agree that small errors are not important , spelling or grammar or otherwise.
However, if the comment is deriding the "state of education", like I said, make sure it's properly spelled and has correct grammar, or you can expect to have it pointed out you have been hoisted by your own petard ^.^
Good job to the producers! How on Earth did they manage to make a program about dinosaurs so unimaginably boring and repetitive like they did with this one! Also the animation was way off. I know it's supposed to be an educational show, but for a program aired in 2009, they could have done way better. Nah I think I'll go back to watching Walking with dinosaurs even though that one isn't up-to-date anymore.
god they're so dumb, even i knew from the beginning, it attacked it on the legs constantly so it could fall down and then take it out..scientists r smart...but no common sense
Perhaps they killed the babies of the Sauropods? they could grapple with the babies or imnature offspring no problem,perhaps they worked in groups of 2-3? sauropods usualy roamed in social groups so a lone attacker is unlikely... do you see a lone lion attack a elephant? never.
I think this beast used teamwork and usualy picked on the babies.
@brennenmyers Good for you! By the way, Deinosuchus was more of an aligator, than a crocodile, but that's not the point. Point is that in my previous comment I contested the theory which says that Deinonychus pushed Acrocanthosaurus into extinction. Your reply was about Deinosuchus, so it had absolutely nothing to do with my comment. Therefore, you need to read carefuly the comments you want to reply to, because otherwise it makes you look like an ass.
@brennenmyers Can you tell the difference between DEINONYCHUS and DEINOSUCHUS ( not Dienosuchus, as you wrote it )? One of them is a dinosaur, the other one isn't! Can you actually tell which is which? If not, perhaps you should watch the whole show first, instead of making lame comments...
With the climate changing, the sauropods - who thrived in humid conditions - started disappearing. With their main food source gone, then Acro disappeared as well.
I have a hypothesis that might link to their idea on Acro's extinction. They say that during the mid-Cretaceous, when Acro lived, it was the warmest time in Earth's history. This was caused by a massive series of volcanism, which boosted the air with tons of CO2. But by the time the late Cretaceous arrived, around 95-90 million years ago, the surges of volcanism slowed down, reducing the CO2 levels, slightly cooling the planet, and shrunk the Western Interior Seaway that was present then.
They totally missed it when saying Deinonychus was a threat for Acrocanthosaurus. It is highly unlikely, mainly because the size difference was just too great. A male lion stands it's ground against tens of hyaenas. Also, they hunted significantly different prey. Acrocanthosaurus's doom was most likely caused by the rapid decline of sauropods.
Unlike Biggest Killer Dino, this episode is really great. When Philip Currie talks about carnivore dinosaurs, we better listen!
Dienosuchus is thought to get btwn 33 and 45 ft long and approx. 5-7 tons, thus making heavier than Acrocanthosaurus and it also was thought to steel food FROM big predators, so acro would have had to look out for a big croc, so it could keep its kill.
Honestly I'm surprised they didn't mention Utahraptor. It lived at the same time as Acrocanthosaurus, had all the same adaptations as Deinoychus, and was bigger.
@TheTomboyPresident In other words, a group of T-Rexs were just as deadly at tackling with bigger prey as a group of Acrocanthosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus etc. But because very large prey was almost absent during its time, T-Rex had to take down smaller prey because that's what was around. It developed a crushing biteforce as a response to this adaptation at hunting smaller but in many cases, heavily armored prey. Acrocanthosaurus didn't need a strong biteforce.
@TheTomboyPresident Acrocanthosaurus was roughly the same size (only slightly smaller) as Tyrannosaurus Rex, not 6000 pounds lighter. It preyed on large sauropods because it hunted in packs. The same must have been true for T-Rex when talking about taking down prey bigger than itself, like Alamosaurus, the largest sauropod during the late Cretaceous. So saying T-Rex was able to hunt only smaller prey is not true, because except Alamosaurus, there were no other bigger dinosaurs during its time.
Even a T. rex skull can't withstand the stresses of hundreds of tons of bite force, it doesn't have enough room for the muscles needed to generate that much force. Let alone a Utahraptor skull! These were living animals, not fairy tale dragons - they DID have limits to their strength.
its kinda funny they say trex is "weak" yet, they hav PROOF Trex was the only animal a raptor wouldn't challenge or fight, yet Acro gets his ass kicked by raptors all the time
The raptors in T. rex's time were puny little Dromaeosaurus, the ones in Acro's time were big Utahraptors. So the size of the raptors mattered too. Even so, there's no evidence that raptors EVER attacked an Acro. Acro still had 100x their bite force.
????? You have NO point to begin with, idiot. T. rex had at most 3 times the bite force of Acro, not 300 times. 300 times the bite force of Acro would be hundreds of tons of pressure, that would literally break the bones of any animal doing the biting. You obviously failed physics class. And biology too.
These big predators had bite forces in tons, NOT hundreds of tons. Once again another dumb T.rex worshipping Jurassic Park fanboy thinking he's an expert who knows EVERYTHING....
@susumu07 actually utahraptors where not in the same time era as acro it was deinochys they where pack hunters in groups of 5 to 6 predators lead by a male or female they where one of the smartest raptors to evolve
and i think the only way a acrocanthosaurus could have died out was the evolution of more complex prey such as the heavily armoured dinosaurs and the duck bill hadrosaurs
You're probably right, Acro wasn't built to deal with armored dinosaurs (though I don't think hadrosaurs were so much of a problem for it.... they were just a bit too fast perhaps but not that well-defended).
Acro's sauropod prey getting scarce was probably what did it in. That's the Achilles heel of all specialized predators.
@susumu07 also the acro could have had a advantage if it evolved the same time as allosaurus where prey was at it's largest quite unfortunate really. :(
Good point. Something like Acro could have driven Allosaurus into extinction. Though the sauropods in the EK were pretty big too. Sauroposeidon was bigger than any Jurassic brachiosaurs. Of course, it may have been TOO bog for Acro to take on. It was a lot bigger than Paluxysaurus.
I don't think 'daspletosaurs' had anything to do with it, they were separated by at least thirty million years. You would probably have a wave of different Carcharodontosaurs and more primitive Tyrannosaurs in the meantime.
They should've included the utahraptors in this episode - in Bakker's "Raptor Red", they and the acros fiercely competed against each other, and they were much bigger than the deinonychus, much more troublesome rivals for the acros...
@Junketh71 Another good point. Together with the different raptors and the daspletasaurs the acros were getting out competed by much better adapted predators.
0:11 awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
TheScrawnyChicken 3 weeks ago
Even all these "experts" who criticize each other have no idea at all of what happened with these creatures. They only have bones and their big Steven Spielberg imagination to brag about stuff because they have their PhDs. Paleontologists are like Teologists: the have a "science" built up on beliefs more than facts.
And the poeple here is even worse, because at least they have a PhD on something that they studied.
You guys know only Hollywood crap. So STFU. Talk about football or baseball.
SomeoneCommenting 4 weeks ago
@SomeoneCommenting Even Spielberg's beasts made more sense.
CanadianBaconPwnage 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I remember growing up watching this at early 2001. Looking back at it as an adult, wow do I real retarded just for glancing at it too long. This really makes zero sense and as a kid, I didn't even noticed such dramatic lacks of consistencies with excruciatingly bad info. This wasn't even a good documentary series to begin with and we are all aware of the fact it was forcefully canceled half way because of such debacles. But, 2001 was a very long time ago.
calibersoul2012 1 month ago 5
I remember growing up watching this at early 2001. Looking back at it as an adult, wow do I real retarded just for glancing at it too long. This really makes zero sense and as a kid, I didn't even noticed such dramatic lacks of consistencies with excruciatingly bad info. This wasn't even a good documentary series to begin with and we are all aware of the fact it was forcefully canceled half way because of such debacles. But, 2001 was a very long time ago.
calibersoul2012 1 month ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
It's staggeringly alarming the amount of gullible kids who believe whatever terrible illogical 10 year old documentary tells them without question nor the intellect or education to differentiate realism and dramatic laws of physics breaking assumptions basted on nothing but blatant opinion that has zero evidence to even slightly prove it and is entirely contradictive to itself...
It's a testament to the lack of education in our planet's civilization -_-
elmersglue82 1 month ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
It's staggeringly alarming the amount of gullible kids who believe whatever terrible illogical 10 year old documentary tells them without question nor the intellect or education to differentiate realism and dramatic laws of physics breaking assumptions based on nothing but blatant opinion that has zero evidence to even slightly prove it and is entirely contradictive to itself...
It's a testament to the lack of education in our planet's civilization -_-
elmersglue82 1 month ago 6
Wow... 2001 was a bewildering day for paleontology due to this... it's why it was canceled half way in the first place. 10 years was a long time ago.
elmersglue82 3 months ago
It's staggeringly alarming the amount of gullible kids who believe whatever terrible illogical 10 year old documentary tells them without question nor the intellect or education to differentiate realism and dramatic laws of physics breaking assumptions basted on nothing but blatant opinion that has zero evidence to even slightly prove it and is entirely contradictive to itself...
It's a testament to the lack of education in our planet's civilization -_-
elmersglue82 3 months ago 9
@elmersglue82 Ok calm down with the overuse of big words, doesn't make you better than anyone else.......but I do agree with you :)
JamesGigner33 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@elmersglue82 the irony of your rant when you spell "based" as "basted" is deliciously hilarious ^.^
daverowbotham 1 month ago
@daverowbotham Wow, I didn't even noticed but that was because of this. Sorry, I was typing a bit too fast and didn't even notice such a small insignificant errors.
Also, it's "delicious" It's nice to see you are very comfortable with your fetishes to masturbate to comments but that was more than I needed to know.It scares me that there are people who have such, "conditions".
elmersglue82 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@elmersglue82 you're not clever enough to masterbate to, sorry, people who can't spell don't do it for me ^.^
Also the correct grammar would be "a small insignificant error" nor "errors" ;)
So, looks like you are the one needing educating. ( hint: the moral of the story is when ranting about the "state of education today" make sure your rant is correctly spelled and punctuated or you risk looking like an ass -- which you did ;) .
daverowbotham 1 month ago
@daverowbotham Posting a comment with a single small error as a YouTube comment is not an indicator of how intelligent a person is. It's just a YouTube video, not a college exam.The fact that you actually believe that's the case only shows such processing debacles and actually a low intellect on your part rather than my own.
Lesson of today: Your claims are ironic as for they are shrouded in hypocrisy. Might want to think about that.
elmersglue82 1 month ago
Comment removed
daverowbotham 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@elmersglue82 I totally agree that small errors are not important , spelling or grammar or otherwise.
However, if the comment is deriding the "state of education", like I said, make sure it's properly spelled and has correct grammar, or you can expect to have it pointed out you have been hoisted by your own petard ^.^
toodle pip for now :)
daverowbotham 1 month ago
They made deinonychus appear smaller than it's actual size, it was almost three times as big as it shows in this episode
Baderwe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Baderwe yesyou musr have been alive too see this why would anyone beleive this as opposed to someone that knows next to nothing????????
thoostorm4 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Good job to the producers! How on Earth did they manage to make a program about dinosaurs so unimaginably boring and repetitive like they did with this one! Also the animation was way off. I know it's supposed to be an educational show, but for a program aired in 2009, they could have done way better. Nah I think I'll go back to watching Walking with dinosaurs even though that one isn't up-to-date anymore.
KissaKawaguichi 4 months ago
0:10 OMG face :P
Andy4everawsomeTV 4 months ago
they didnt once theorize that it may also be a carrion eater like they do with t rex
fielsofthenephilim 5 months ago
@fielsofthenephilim It would have to eat a lot of carrion. :) But there were big walking slabs of meat around at the time so I can believe it.
restlesspride666 5 months ago
Man, this show is so darn inaccurate! I mean, just look at that naked, featherless Deinonychus, at 15:50! (Sighs). :(
Utahraptor2003 5 months ago
If I was a dinosaur, I'd be stoned all the time. Raaaaaaaa!
ZeppelinFloydRoses 6 months ago
god they're so dumb, even i knew from the beginning, it attacked it on the legs constantly so it could fall down and then take it out..scientists r smart...but no common sense
926531 6 months ago
@926531 Yes. So it's gonna attack the legs and get kicked in the face. I don't think so.
SuperheldScottie 6 months ago
0:07 I will just run strait towards it like an idiot.^_^Yeah that l work!
LaurAgony 7 months ago
20:03
"Dude, stop it...that's annoying" *Bitchslap*
Slasher9485 7 months ago
Comment removed
kevennboss 7 months ago
LOL at 6:33....KNOCKOUT!!!!!!!
winniethethrough 7 months ago
why is the acro running like a 1960s trex? it is so unrealitic!!
winniethethrough 7 months ago
Perhaps they killed the babies of the Sauropods? they could grapple with the babies or imnature offspring no problem,perhaps they worked in groups of 2-3? sauropods usualy roamed in social groups so a lone attacker is unlikely... do you see a lone lion attack a elephant? never.
I think this beast used teamwork and usualy picked on the babies.
realistromeo 8 months ago
@realistromeo uh dude even in a pack lions don't screw with elephants
wwejheaton 1 week ago
tyvm for upload
BimmWPBS 8 months ago
or mayby the footprint wore away?
MrMaxlockhart 8 months ago
@brennenmyers Good for you! By the way, Deinosuchus was more of an aligator, than a crocodile, but that's not the point. Point is that in my previous comment I contested the theory which says that Deinonychus pushed Acrocanthosaurus into extinction. Your reply was about Deinosuchus, so it had absolutely nothing to do with my comment. Therefore, you need to read carefuly the comments you want to reply to, because otherwise it makes you look like an ass.
Sorvos 8 months ago
@CrashMarioSonic The question was rhetorical. I don't have time to explain. Read previous comments if you want to understand.
Sorvos 8 months ago
@brennenmyers Can you tell the difference between DEINONYCHUS and DEINOSUCHUS ( not Dienosuchus, as you wrote it )? One of them is a dinosaur, the other one isn't! Can you actually tell which is which? If not, perhaps you should watch the whole show first, instead of making lame comments...
Sorvos 8 months ago
@Sorvos deinonychus is a raptor-like animal whilst deinosuchus is a huge 12m croc.
CrashMarioSonic 8 months ago in playlist music list #2
@Sorvos
yes i can, deinosuchus= big ass crocodile that could kill dinosaurs for food, deinonychus= dinosaur push over
oh and thank you for correcting my spelling, i have a hard time with spelling long words
brennenmyers 8 months ago
Acro is a push over that would have gotten turned into Rex-poo if they had lived at the same time!
brennenmyers 8 months ago
00:12 Fatality 0-0
ToastedFrenchToast 9 months ago
With the climate changing, the sauropods - who thrived in humid conditions - started disappearing. With their main food source gone, then Acro disappeared as well.
thephenon724 9 months ago
I have a hypothesis that might link to their idea on Acro's extinction. They say that during the mid-Cretaceous, when Acro lived, it was the warmest time in Earth's history. This was caused by a massive series of volcanism, which boosted the air with tons of CO2. But by the time the late Cretaceous arrived, around 95-90 million years ago, the surges of volcanism slowed down, reducing the CO2 levels, slightly cooling the planet, and shrunk the Western Interior Seaway that was present then.
thephenon724 9 months ago
Comment removed
thephenon724 9 months ago
That walking animation looks so very wrong.
LordTrilobite 9 months ago
They totally missed it when saying Deinonychus was a threat for Acrocanthosaurus. It is highly unlikely, mainly because the size difference was just too great. A male lion stands it's ground against tens of hyaenas. Also, they hunted significantly different prey. Acrocanthosaurus's doom was most likely caused by the rapid decline of sauropods.
Unlike Biggest Killer Dino, this episode is really great. When Philip Currie talks about carnivore dinosaurs, we better listen!
Sorvos 9 months ago
@Sorvos
Dienosuchus is thought to get btwn 33 and 45 ft long and approx. 5-7 tons, thus making heavier than Acrocanthosaurus and it also was thought to steel food FROM big predators, so acro would have had to look out for a big croc, so it could keep its kill.
brennenmyers 8 months ago
@Sorvos
Honestly I'm surprised they didn't mention Utahraptor. It lived at the same time as Acrocanthosaurus, had all the same adaptations as Deinoychus, and was bigger.
OsirisLord 3 weeks ago
@TheTomboyPresident In other words, a group of T-Rexs were just as deadly at tackling with bigger prey as a group of Acrocanthosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus etc. But because very large prey was almost absent during its time, T-Rex had to take down smaller prey because that's what was around. It developed a crushing biteforce as a response to this adaptation at hunting smaller but in many cases, heavily armored prey. Acrocanthosaurus didn't need a strong biteforce.
Sorvos 9 months ago
@TheTomboyPresident Acrocanthosaurus was roughly the same size (only slightly smaller) as Tyrannosaurus Rex, not 6000 pounds lighter. It preyed on large sauropods because it hunted in packs. The same must have been true for T-Rex when talking about taking down prey bigger than itself, like Alamosaurus, the largest sauropod during the late Cretaceous. So saying T-Rex was able to hunt only smaller prey is not true, because except Alamosaurus, there were no other bigger dinosaurs during its time.
Sorvos 9 months ago
Acrocanthosaurus was a 9,000-pound predator with knifelike teeth and claws that killed prey almost 10 times its size.
Tyrannosaurus rex was a 15,000-pound predator with spike-like teeth and hooklike claws that killed and ate anything smaller than itself.
Thus, during the Dinosaur Age, Acro was the lion, while T-rex was the Kodiak bear.
TheTomboyPresident 10 months ago
the acro are so cool!
EvilXbunny12 10 months ago
why does this show repeat itself so god damn much
jjono1991 10 months ago
Even a T. rex skull can't withstand the stresses of hundreds of tons of bite force, it doesn't have enough room for the muscles needed to generate that much force. Let alone a Utahraptor skull! These were living animals, not fairy tale dragons - they DID have limits to their strength.
susumu07 11 months ago
great stuff.,
gunawanfahri 11 months ago
That Sauropod is running way too fast. + speculation about extinction of Acrocanthosaurus (only one possible answer given, not enough)
Paralititan 11 months ago
@Paralititan i'd say by human standerds it was only running about as fast as an elephant.
ceitiosaurus 10 months ago
its kinda funny they say trex is "weak" yet, they hav PROOF Trex was the only animal a raptor wouldn't challenge or fight, yet Acro gets his ass kicked by raptors all the time
RedRex300 1 year ago
@RedRex300
The raptors in T. rex's time were puny little Dromaeosaurus, the ones in Acro's time were big Utahraptors. So the size of the raptors mattered too. Even so, there's no evidence that raptors EVER attacked an Acro. Acro still had 100x their bite force.
susumu07 1 year ago
@susumu07 ok sure 100x, trex had abt 300x the bite force of acro so shut the hell up, u just made my point even more obvious
RedRex300 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RedRex300
????? You have NO point to begin with, idiot. T. rex had at most 3 times the bite force of Acro, not 300 times. 300 times the bite force of Acro would be hundreds of tons of pressure, that would literally break the bones of any animal doing the biting. You obviously failed physics class. And biology too.
These big predators had bite forces in tons, NOT hundreds of tons. Once again another dumb T.rex worshipping Jurassic Park fanboy thinking he's an expert who knows EVERYTHING....
susumu07 11 months ago 4
@susumu07 actually utahraptors where not in the same time era as acro it was deinochys they where pack hunters in groups of 5 to 6 predators lead by a male or female they where one of the smartest raptors to evolve
and i think the only way a acrocanthosaurus could have died out was the evolution of more complex prey such as the heavily armoured dinosaurs and the duck bill hadrosaurs
XjerichoX12 10 months ago
@XjerichoX12
You're probably right, Acro wasn't built to deal with armored dinosaurs (though I don't think hadrosaurs were so much of a problem for it.... they were just a bit too fast perhaps but not that well-defended).
Acro's sauropod prey getting scarce was probably what did it in. That's the Achilles heel of all specialized predators.
susumu07 10 months ago
@susumu07 also the acro could have had a advantage if it evolved the same time as allosaurus where prey was at it's largest quite unfortunate really. :(
XjerichoX12 10 months ago
@XjerichoX12
Good point. Something like Acro could have driven Allosaurus into extinction. Though the sauropods in the EK were pretty big too. Sauroposeidon was bigger than any Jurassic brachiosaurs. Of course, it may have been TOO bog for Acro to take on. It was a lot bigger than Paluxysaurus.
susumu07 10 months ago
sorry but 0:55 just dont make any sense |:
MrPIROCAS 1 year ago
I don't think 'daspletosaurs' had anything to do with it, they were separated by at least thirty million years. You would probably have a wave of different Carcharodontosaurs and more primitive Tyrannosaurs in the meantime.
Gregatafloy 1 year ago
At least this episode doesn't have being killed and eaten like the spinosaurus and the Terror bird episodes.
Also I think another factor towards acro's death was the introduction of tyrannasauriade maybe daspletus.
BrontoSmilodon1 1 year ago
@BrontoSmilodon1 Very good point. Even though daspletasaurs were smaller they'd be quicker, more agile, and have that massive biting power.
BLowes45 1 year ago
They should've included the utahraptors in this episode - in Bakker's "Raptor Red", they and the acros fiercely competed against each other, and they were much bigger than the deinonychus, much more troublesome rivals for the acros...
Junketh71 1 year ago
@Junketh71 Another good point. Together with the different raptors and the daspletasaurs the acros were getting out competed by much better adapted predators.
BLowes45 1 year ago
YES!!! PART 2
whatyouknowabouthat 1 year ago
NICE HD! keep it up
cpde25 1 year ago