CBSNEWS you are a bunch of fucking lying scum. Unknown, how long have nuclear plants been around giving it's employees low doses of radiation? Unknown, how about the doses of radiation in Nagasaki. I hope Anonymous hacks your shit News Station. Liars !!!!!
keep in mind that Bush41 was ambassador to the U.N. and loyal to the German bloodeed royal family. he was knighted in the early 1980s for selling out America and setting up Japan, Europe's biggest economic competitor, for the Fukushima meltdowns. The Nazi eugenics program was pushed by Prescott Bush, who was Hitler's banker in the U.S.. There is no harmless level of radiation. This documentary is A+.
....these dose rates are EXTERNAL radiation exposures.
The main threat to health is from internal exposure - ie the inhalation and digestion of radioactive particles that lodge in the lungs, gut and can move around in the blood stream and effect any body organ.
The maximum dose rate becomes irrelevant when youre inhaling and eating "hot particles"
A few inhaled nano particle of Plutonium and you're gone in the long run - an almost certain road to cancer
@Alchaeon1, good points! This video addresses the 20 mSv/y maximum dose rate allowed in Fukushima, and if you want to compare that dose rate to dose-rate findings in the medical literature, the studies you'll find involve external exposures.
The fact that the literature reports increased cancer mortality at low external dose rates demonstrates that external doses are not irrelevant. If just those external doses increase mortality, a-fortiori those external doses + internal doses can't be safe!
@Alchaeon1 please we must show all people the cure for radaion poisoning, Bentonite Clay and I am already starting to send Bentonite clay to help heal people in Japan right now directly to them, please check out my links I have more info on the real cures to help people from radation poisoning, this will help all people in the world
@HRCKH3 ベントナイト粘土が放射能中毒を助ける、起こしてください, I am helping people in Japan right now with Bentonite clay to help them to heal, please tell all people how to heal with Bentonite clay
Nice job, Its nice to see the issues with low dose radiation brought to light. The staff in radiology depts should be worried with the mickey mouse shielding that they put faith in to be safe
Whoever posted this vid needs to rewrite the headlines and write something that get this video viral cuz it needs to be for this world to see that our governments plural are out of and are in need of a big change. Also, these owners of the companys that created thes nuclear system need to be fined and imprisoned...Rockefellers are going to stand before God at his throne for judgement one day soon and I cant wait!
Thehealphysicist, I will not bother to answer to him that much anymore
He is the one who clime to have little know of physic
And he wont to dispute Helen Caldicott studys!? and Chernobyl Janette Sherman,M.D Toxicologist
Insisting radiation does not harm and do not give cancer, that births in Chernobyl disaster, no child has suffer from DNA deformation .I'v seen them, poor children's Look Adi Roche Chernobyl Ireland. No radiation is safe!!
Japan, 3 leaks in amerika and two in europe that I have seen in the news just this year. Sounds fishy. Indefinate detention of amerikan citizens and now its out that they are staffing the fema camps. Economic collapse worldwide is knocking at the door and you have to be really stupid not to see that it was totally on purpose. Sam smuggling guns to mexico to blame the 2nd amend. TSA checkpoints on the road. Radioactive water in philly.. Its nazi germany 1938 and we are all gonna be the jews.
First, the Japanese gov't rescinded the 20 mSv/yr limit, which was only applicable for one month. It's back to 1 mSv/yr. Second, your playing semantics with the word "safe". Something doesn't have to cause zero deaths to be safe, which seems to be what you're inferring. Many people drive autos because they don't feel unsafe - they feel safe. Even though thousands of people die every year from auto wrecks.
@TheHealthPhysicist, is there not a logical problem in saying 20 mSv/y (ie, per year) was intended apply for only one month? Can you cite a source supporting your claim?
Also, people don't drive cars because they believe they're safe, but because they value transportation more than the risks involved. So the *utility* of cars exceeds their risks. Nuclear fallout, on the other hand, offers no counter-balancing utility. So your analogy of fallout to cars is apples to oranges.
I'm having trouble getting YouTube to accept links. I have linked to this video in my blog (click on my picture to get blog address). There you will find sources. Also, the fallout was associated with the value of using nuclear power. The utility of nuclear power was felt to exceed the risk of an accident. My analogy is completely apples to apples.
@TheHealthPhysicist, thanks! But while the report you cite does imply a 1 mSv/y limit, that's also the national limit. 20 mSv/y was for Fukushima only and which standard is referred to is not explicit.
I did find this: "In late May, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology conceded that 20 mSv was not appropriate and announced that it would endeavor to limit exposure to 1 mSv." But the report says the "endeavor" was limited to exposures at schools.
Then you didn't read the second link in the blog which reiterated the 1 mSv/yr limit for children and adults at Fukushima specifically. The first link said, "Despite this, many people still reside within Fukushima. One of the most at risk demographics is children...". So it was clearly pinpointing the location and age group that was under discussion.
@TheHealthPhysicist, the subjects are in Fukushima, but what I said still applies. Your interpretation is sensible prima facia, but we still don't have an explicit statement contrary to the statement I quote @ 0:13.
I can't see how the Govt could have a limit lower than the expected exposure, and in that broader context your sensible interpretation isn't persuasive. Notice that in the Science quote, the population must be removed from any region with exposures above limit.
@TheHealthPhysicist, a June 17 article in Science (Vol 332, p 1368) states that on June 6, "the government announced that it is again considering widening the evacuation zone northwest of the plant where radiation doses could accumulate to more than 20 millisieverts over a year."
So if as you said the limit had been intended to be lowered to 1 mSv/y in May, that statement can't be true. But I'm sure that quoted statement is true. That said, your point might be true in part.
The article you just quoted tells you that the limit is 1 mSv/yr..." But it is still 10 times background levels and even above the 1-millisievert-per-year limit for ordinary citizens set by Japanese law."
Since the evacuation zone could result in accumulated doses above 20 mSv/yr, it is being evacuated. That's because the limit is 1 mSv/yr.
@TheHealthPhysicist, you're misreading the article, it's saying the level is 10 time the limit in * Chiba Prefecture * and the limit there is still the normal 1 mSv/y standard. That's what they mean by 1 mSv/y "for ordinary citizens." This is not ambiguous.
Your 0:13 in the video mentions April 19 raising of limit. My first blog link (May 28) says that the limit raised last month was rescinded. There were no other raised limits for the public. Timing and location in perfect synch. I realize para are in Chiba Prefecture....that doesn't change what the national limit is. You are conflating a legal dose limit with an exposure condition. That para says Chiba conditions exceed limit, but no evac.
@TheHealthPhysicist, your first link is to a blog entry that the data we've reviewed proves to be mistaken.
I don't put more faith in a blog post than in the journal Science, which clearly indicates that 20 mSv/y was in effect a time past May 28 because the population would have to be relocated if the "radiation doses could accumulate to more than 20 millisieverts over a year."
I'm referring to the LINK within the blog from LA Times, which says "Under the new guidelines, the government set the upper limit of safe radiation exposure for children at 20 millisieverts per year, from 1 millisievert previously. On Friday, Japan's Education Ministry pulled an about-face, announcing plans to return exposure limits for children at school to 1 millisievert a year."Science is saying that limit is 1 mSv/yr, people who could get 20 mSv/yr are being relocated.
If you go back to my blog, I updated with a definitive link that should leave no question at all that I have been correct. The limit you reference as being raised, was lowered within a month.
@TheHealthPhysicist, your new link says: "On Friday, Japan's Education Ministry pulled an about-face, announcing plans to return exposure limits for children at school to 1 millisievert a year."
"Announcing plans" to lower the limit is not the same as lowing it. As we learned, thanks to researching your claim, the level for children was lowered in late August to < 1 mSv/y but only * at school *. That Aug 26, AFP report would make no sense if your full claim was true.
You are being ridiculous. You don't understand how radiation regulations work. There isn't a separate category for "at school". There are children, adults, nuclear workers and emergency workers. No one is separating the doses received from children "at school" from those "not at school". Children are children. You might want to read the U.S. regulations called Title 10 Code of Federal Regulation Part 20. Much the same as the Japanese.
@TheHealthPhysicist, I'm sorry your claim fell apart under examination, but it wasn't totally wrong, as noted and given thanks for. Yet you still insist that your claim was totally correct.
The only thing I can suggest is that you write a letter to Agence France-Presse and the journal Science to tell them how confuse they are. In the meantime, I'm putting my faith in them. Thanks again.
@TheHealthPhysicist, the AFP report clearly and unequivocally states that the dose of radiation for children was lowered (not in May as you claimed) but in late August. And not to 1 mSv/y total as you claimed, but "to below one millisievert per year while at school."
Your portrayal of the AFP-reported caveat "while at school" as my being confused is plainly disingenuous. Same for your misrepresentation of the Science article. And even as I was being polite. Blocked for BS!
@TheHealthPhysicist, this is a cite that best supports your claim. From an Aug 26 AFP report: "Japan on Friday lowered radiation exposure limits for children to below one millisievert per year while at school due to health concerns in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear crisis."
But note the significant caveat, the new level is < 1 mSv/y only "while at school." This isn't the same as lowering the total limit from 20 to 1 mSv/y, but it is something. Thank you for your critique!
@GoddardsJournal Not sure if this is relevant, but they're aiming to limit exposure to the public <1 mSv/year at the 20 km boundary.
"Bringing release of radioactive materials from primary containment vessel under control and reducing public radiation exposure by additional release (not to exceed 1 mSv/year at the site boundary as a target)."
It's currently 0.1 mSv/year at the boundary.
In: Fukushima Daiichi Status Report- 24 November 2011
The Wall Street Journal (Dec 16, today): "The evacuation orders have been issued to avoid exposing local residents to radiation of more than 20 millisieverts per year […] On Thursday, a panel of experts recommended to the government that the radiation level per year should be reduced to 10 millisieverts or less in two years, where possible. For places often used by children, the radiation level should not exceed 1 millisievert, it said."
@TheHealthPhysicist You not only make errors of fact, you are an Obfukuscationist. a new kind of intentional deflection obscurer misinformation agent. You need cudgeling
@TheHealthPhysicist, right, I'm using the word 'Safe' in that tricky deceptive way to mean 'harmless'. That same meaning as in the dictionary, which was therefore obviously written by a bunch of anti-nuclear propagandists.
Why those deceptive dictionary writers would lead us to believe all manner of madness like that "cold shutdown" means "no longer warm and termination of activity," when in fact it means whatever's needed to make the nuclear industry look safe. Time for new-clear dictionaries!
Thanks for this analysis. I think anyone with a shred of human decency and commonsense would be able to see that the JP government and TEPCO are unified in promoting this unsafe industry and that they both have a long and prominent history of fraud and cover up, graft and corruption. Once again a few make money while others are put at risk. The entire health of the planet has been jeopardized so a handful of people can make money. Our entire culture looks the other way.
@r3VOLt23 actually, you will find that youtube is simply changing the way such videos are being shared, and if you like, favorite and post it to your facebook, you will find that it is easier to share such things as these.
@r3VOLt23 It's amazing you would have to point it out. The new page is a farce. It removes all the critical info as you've shown in your video. Now there are no Friends and Subscribers, my page now says "contact suggestions". We need some of those 1960's constitutional rights lawyers, all of which seem to have crawled under the carpet.
@r3VOLt23 Comments are gone? They are right HERE, I mean, we are commenting as we speak. The whole Occupy Wall Street thing would not have gone viral without the youtube videos, all the good stuff IS getting out there, but it is up to YOU to promote it, it is not like the old days where random stuff got put on the front page anymore. The viewwhoreing shit is only prominent because those are the ones who are promoting themselves well.
CBSNEWS you are a bunch of fucking lying scum. Unknown, how long have nuclear plants been around giving it's employees low doses of radiation? Unknown, how about the doses of radiation in Nagasaki. I hope Anonymous hacks your shit News Station. Liars !!!!!
Th2EyA0rEa1MoN2gUs 2 weeks ago
keep in mind that Bush41 was ambassador to the U.N. and loyal to the German bloodeed royal family. he was knighted in the early 1980s for selling out America and setting up Japan, Europe's biggest economic competitor, for the Fukushima meltdowns. The Nazi eugenics program was pushed by Prescott Bush, who was Hitler's banker in the U.S.. There is no harmless level of radiation. This documentary is A+.
howardtlewisiiiify 3 weeks ago
Yes, Thank You. So well done. And so sad.
Underpalace 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from GoddardsJournal
Thank you for your upload.
macos9x 4 weeks ago
Thank you for this..
humandread 1 month ago
....these dose rates are EXTERNAL radiation exposures.
The main threat to health is from internal exposure - ie the inhalation and digestion of radioactive particles that lodge in the lungs, gut and can move around in the blood stream and effect any body organ.
The maximum dose rate becomes irrelevant when youre inhaling and eating "hot particles"
A few inhaled nano particle of Plutonium and you're gone in the long run - an almost certain road to cancer
Alchaeon1 1 month ago
@Alchaeon1, good points! This video addresses the 20 mSv/y maximum dose rate allowed in Fukushima, and if you want to compare that dose rate to dose-rate findings in the medical literature, the studies you'll find involve external exposures.
The fact that the literature reports increased cancer mortality at low external dose rates demonstrates that external doses are not irrelevant. If just those external doses increase mortality, a-fortiori those external doses + internal doses can't be safe!
GoddardsJournal 1 month ago
@Alchaeon1 please we must show all people the cure for radaion poisoning, Bentonite Clay and I am already starting to send Bentonite clay to help heal people in Japan right now directly to them, please check out my links I have more info on the real cures to help people from radation poisoning, this will help all people in the world
SpaceMan131326 1 month ago
NOT SAFE!
つまり、20 mSv/yってのは、まったくもって「安全じゃない！」。
子供たちを守るためにも、もっともっと日本を叩いてくれ!!
HRCKH3 1 month ago
@HRCKH3 ベントナイト粘土が放射能中毒を助ける、起こしてください, I am helping people in Japan right now with Bentonite clay to help them to heal, please tell all people how to heal with Bentonite clay
SpaceMan131326 1 month ago
いずれにせよ、、
Kwatanabe0212 1 month ago
東京電力はこのままでいいのだろうか、いづれにせよ、わたしたちには決定権が皆無であることは間違いない。
Kwatanabe0212 1 month ago
Your analyses are of great help to the Japanese people !
rainkame2 2 months ago
Bravo,
Nice job, Its nice to see the issues with low dose radiation brought to light. The staff in radiology depts should be worried with the mickey mouse shielding that they put faith in to be safe
Pblined 2 months ago 5
seems the government of Japan shall be moved to "safe" Fukushima (but not their wifes and kids)
7Nora 2 months ago
Governments plural are out of Control*!!!!
Throwinfire101 2 months ago
Whoever posted this vid needs to rewrite the headlines and write something that get this video viral cuz it needs to be for this world to see that our governments plural are out of and are in need of a big change. Also, these owners of the companys that created thes nuclear system need to be fined and imprisoned...Rockefellers are going to stand before God at his throne for judgement one day soon and I cant wait!
Throwinfire101 2 months ago
Thehealphysicist, I will not bother to answer to him that much anymore
He is the one who clime to have little know of physic
And he wont to dispute Helen Caldicott studys!? and Chernobyl Janette Sherman,M.D Toxicologist
Insisting radiation does not harm and do not give cancer, that births in Chernobyl disaster, no child has suffer from DNA deformation .I'v seen them, poor children's Look Adi Roche Chernobyl Ireland. No radiation is safe!!
Save children first. Crime against humanity
r3VOLt23 2 months ago
Excellent video. Thank you very much for your work. Majia Nadesan
raven5555able 2 months ago
Japan, 3 leaks in amerika and two in europe that I have seen in the news just this year. Sounds fishy. Indefinate detention of amerikan citizens and now its out that they are staffing the fema camps. Economic collapse worldwide is knocking at the door and you have to be really stupid not to see that it was totally on purpose. Sam smuggling guns to mexico to blame the 2nd amend. TSA checkpoints on the road. Radioactive water in philly.. Its nazi germany 1938 and we are all gonna be the jews.
bigbadk55 2 months ago
First, the Japanese gov't rescinded the 20 mSv/yr limit, which was only applicable for one month. It's back to 1 mSv/yr. Second, your playing semantics with the word "safe". Something doesn't have to cause zero deaths to be safe, which seems to be what you're inferring. Many people drive autos because they don't feel unsafe - they feel safe. Even though thousands of people die every year from auto wrecks.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, is there not a logical problem in saying 20 mSv/y (ie, per year) was intended apply for only one month? Can you cite a source supporting your claim?
Also, people don't drive cars because they believe they're safe, but because they value transportation more than the risks involved. So the *utility* of cars exceeds their risks. Nuclear fallout, on the other hand, offers no counter-balancing utility. So your analogy of fallout to cars is apples to oranges.
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
I'm having trouble getting YouTube to accept links. I have linked to this video in my blog (click on my picture to get blog address). There you will find sources. Also, the fallout was associated with the value of using nuclear power. The utility of nuclear power was felt to exceed the risk of an accident. My analogy is completely apples to apples.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, thanks! But while the report you cite does imply a 1 mSv/y limit, that's also the national limit. 20 mSv/y was for Fukushima only and which standard is referred to is not explicit.
I did find this: "In late May, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology conceded that 20 mSv was not appropriate and announced that it would endeavor to limit exposure to 1 mSv." But the report says the "endeavor" was limited to exposures at schools.
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
Then you didn't read the second link in the blog which reiterated the 1 mSv/yr limit for children and adults at Fukushima specifically. The first link said, "Despite this, many people still reside within Fukushima. One of the most at risk demographics is children...". So it was clearly pinpointing the location and age group that was under discussion.
Good job on your other research.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, the subjects are in Fukushima, but what I said still applies. Your interpretation is sensible prima facia, but we still don't have an explicit statement contrary to the statement I quote @ 0:13.
I can't see how the Govt could have a limit lower than the expected exposure, and in that broader context your sensible interpretation isn't persuasive. Notice that in the Science quote, the population must be removed from any region with exposures above limit.
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, a June 17 article in Science (Vol 332, p 1368) states that on June 6, "the government announced that it is again considering widening the evacuation zone northwest of the plant where radiation doses could accumulate to more than 20 millisieverts over a year."
So if as you said the limit had been intended to be lowered to 1 mSv/y in May, that statement can't be true. But I'm sure that quoted statement is true. That said, your point might be true in part.
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
The article you just quoted tells you that the limit is 1 mSv/yr..." But it is still 10 times background levels and even above the 1-millisievert-per-year limit for ordinary citizens set by Japanese law."
Since the evacuation zone could result in accumulated doses above 20 mSv/yr, it is being evacuated. That's because the limit is 1 mSv/yr.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, you're misreading the article, it's saying the level is 10 time the limit in * Chiba Prefecture * and the limit there is still the normal 1 mSv/y standard. That's what they mean by 1 mSv/y "for ordinary citizens." This is not ambiguous.
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
Your 0:13 in the video mentions April 19 raising of limit. My first blog link (May 28) says that the limit raised last month was rescinded. There were no other raised limits for the public. Timing and location in perfect synch. I realize para are in Chiba Prefecture....that doesn't change what the national limit is. You are conflating a legal dose limit with an exposure condition. That para says Chiba conditions exceed limit, but no evac.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
P.S. An "ordinary citizen" refers to a non-nuclear worker. It does NOT refer to a non-Fukushima citizen.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, your first link is to a blog entry that the data we've reviewed proves to be mistaken.
I don't put more faith in a blog post than in the journal Science, which clearly indicates that 20 mSv/y was in effect a time past May 28 because the population would have to be relocated if the "radiation doses could accumulate to more than 20 millisieverts over a year."
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
I'm referring to the LINK within the blog from LA Times, which says "Under the new guidelines, the government set the upper limit of safe radiation exposure for children at 20 millisieverts per year, from 1 millisievert previously. On Friday, Japan's Education Ministry pulled an about-face, announcing plans to return exposure limits for children at school to 1 millisievert a year."Science is saying that limit is 1 mSv/yr, people who could get 20 mSv/yr are being relocated.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
If you go back to my blog, I updated with a definitive link that should leave no question at all that I have been correct. The limit you reference as being raised, was lowered within a month.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, your new link says: "On Friday, Japan's Education Ministry pulled an about-face, announcing plans to return exposure limits for children at school to 1 millisievert a year."
"Announcing plans" to lower the limit is not the same as lowing it. As we learned, thanks to researching your claim, the level for children was lowered in late August to < 1 mSv/y but only * at school *. That Aug 26, AFP report would make no sense if your full claim was true.
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
You are being ridiculous. You don't understand how radiation regulations work. There isn't a separate category for "at school". There are children, adults, nuclear workers and emergency workers. No one is separating the doses received from children "at school" from those "not at school". Children are children. You might want to read the U.S. regulations called Title 10 Code of Federal Regulation Part 20. Much the same as the Japanese.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, I'm sorry your claim fell apart under examination, but it wasn't totally wrong, as noted and given thanks for. Yet you still insist that your claim was totally correct.
The only thing I can suggest is that you write a letter to Agence France-Presse and the journal Science to tell them how confuse they are. In the meantime, I'm putting my faith in them. Thanks again.
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
Those sources are not confused. I'm not confused. The only one who is confused, but doesn't realize it, is you. You're welcome, again.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, the AFP report clearly and unequivocally states that the dose of radiation for children was lowered (not in May as you claimed) but in late August. And not to 1 mSv/y total as you claimed, but "to below one millisievert per year while at school."
Your portrayal of the AFP-reported caveat "while at school" as my being confused is plainly disingenuous. Same for your misrepresentation of the Science article. And even as I was being polite. Blocked for BS!
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, this is a cite that best supports your claim. From an Aug 26 AFP report: "Japan on Friday lowered radiation exposure limits for children to below one millisievert per year while at school due to health concerns in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear crisis."
But note the significant caveat, the new level is < 1 mSv/y only "while at school." This isn't the same as lowering the total limit from 20 to 1 mSv/y, but it is something. Thank you for your critique!
iamgoddard 2 months ago
@iamgoddard
You're welcome, but as my blog update makes perfectly clear. You are in error.
TheHealthPhysicist 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist, I still can't figure how you came up with that story. In reality:
Nature (Oct 14): "the Japanese government's official safety limit for radiation exposure is 20 mSv per year."
JAEA (Oct 16) plans: "Decontamination of living environment [...] with additional annual dose estimate of 1-20 mSv."
ICRP (Nov 28) recommends to Japan: "Reference levels in lower part of 1-20 mSv/year." (google quotes)
Aug 26: a goal was issued to lower * school time * doses to <1 mSv/y.
GoddardsJournal 2 months ago
@GoddardsJournal Not sure if this is relevant, but they're aiming to limit exposure to the public <1 mSv/year at the 20 km boundary.
"Bringing release of radioactive materials from primary containment vessel under control and reducing public radiation exposure by additional release (not to exceed 1 mSv/year at the site boundary as a target)."
It's currently 0.1 mSv/year at the boundary.
In: Fukushima Daiichi Status Report- 24 November 2011
Diamonddavej 2 months ago
The Wall Street Journal (Dec 16, today): "The evacuation orders have been issued to avoid exposing local residents to radiation of more than 20 millisieverts per year […] On Thursday, a panel of experts recommended to the government that the radiation level per year should be reduced to 10 millisieverts or less in two years, where possible. For places often used by children, the radiation level should not exceed 1 millisievert, it said."
GoddardsJournal 2 months ago
@TheHealthPhysicist You not only make errors of fact, you are an Obfukuscationist. a new kind of intentional deflection obscurer misinformation agent. You need cudgeling
IExposeMormonism 2 months ago 2
@TheHealthPhysicist, right, I'm using the word 'Safe' in that tricky deceptive way to mean 'harmless'. That same meaning as in the dictionary, which was therefore obviously written by a bunch of anti-nuclear propagandists.
Why those deceptive dictionary writers would lead us to believe all manner of madness like that "cold shutdown" means "no longer warm and termination of activity," when in fact it means whatever's needed to make the nuclear industry look safe. Time for new-clear dictionaries!
GoddardsJournal 1 month ago
Isn't fascism just frigging great?
UU361 2 months ago
Well done, as usual. TY, Ian!
maxie1dog 2 months ago
Thanks for this analysis. I think anyone with a shred of human decency and commonsense would be able to see that the JP government and TEPCO are unified in promoting this unsafe industry and that they both have a long and prominent history of fraud and cover up, graft and corruption. Once again a few make money while others are put at risk. The entire health of the planet has been jeopardized so a handful of people can make money. Our entire culture looks the other way.
CyberDruidtheModGod 2 months ago
Thank you for your analysis!
junebloke 2 months ago
Thank you for detailed analysis. I liked, favored, added to playlist, backed up, and I will spread this on social sites.
th3dig1tal0n3 2 months ago
Thank You, censorship is becoming biggest issue on what is happening
in this tragic happening in Japan, repercussions are reflecting on all our life
globally! THIS NEWS MUST BE SHERED ( YT has censoring plans with this
new lay out- end of shearing and alternative info).. do You mind if we
mirror this video Will feature it and promote. Excellent report, grateful
what ever You decide will be fine.
Blessings
r3VOLt23 2 months ago
@r3VOLt23 actually, you will find that youtube is simply changing the way such videos are being shared, and if you like, favorite and post it to your facebook, you will find that it is easier to share such things as these.
dangerouslytalented 2 months ago
@dangerouslytalented Honestly you believe in what you say..simply!?
This presentation, imposed decisions of yt..design by selves as a credit card format
You can see only banks, found no people or chance 2 be self inventive, collective
Cut from creative individual artistic contributions..shearing..5 people..face boo??
YT is pushing adds and big channels..money spinning, promoting subculture!
How to promote our videos,..tell me, comments r gone, it was way to identify
How can you defend this?!
r3VOLt23 2 months ago
@r3VOLt23 It's amazing you would have to point it out. The new page is a farce. It removes all the critical info as you've shown in your video. Now there are no Friends and Subscribers, my page now says "contact suggestions". We need some of those 1960's constitutional rights lawyers, all of which seem to have crawled under the carpet.
IExposeMormonism 2 months ago
@r3VOLt23 Comments are gone? They are right HERE, I mean, we are commenting as we speak. The whole Occupy Wall Street thing would not have gone viral without the youtube videos, all the good stuff IS getting out there, but it is up to YOU to promote it, it is not like the old days where random stuff got put on the front page anymore. The viewwhoreing shit is only prominent because those are the ones who are promoting themselves well.
dangerouslytalented 2 months ago