@Mrthegnomez Dude your 16 stop getting your info from COD and wait till your actually in the Fucking military to even begin to act like you know what your talking about as a member of the armed forces I say wait till your an nco before you go and say stuff chances are you'll be my troop and you'll just be busy using a broom and mop before any other stuffn
Point is, Russia is not the most powerful country in the world, most of the people that come here and comment on this are war happy soft cod players. Me, a 16 year old kid, Planning to join the US Army, am not the one to say a country sucks, I join because I love my country, I hate my government, But I love my country for what it could be. I will use the weapons I have to use, IT IS NOT THE GUN THAT IS BETTER, IT IS THE SHOOTER! I am an excellent shot, I could take a russian out with a pistol.
@SecretSpetsnaz First off... I never mentioned training, therefor you either have terrible reading skills or listening skills period. Second off, you are way too late, You cannot fathom the amount of fuck in which I do not give at this point. Lastly, yes, yes I can "Own" a Russian soldier, It's not that hard man. Seriously... They roll around on the ground and shit, that's their avoidance tactics... To fucking roll on the ground. I also didn't brag, at all. I also said a pistol, not no weapons.
@MrTheGnomez oh shut the fuck up you fucking idiot the truth is we all die so fuck off and stop commenting you piece of shit have fun living stupid piece of shit
O yea we are so strong that the five of us can push this tank to a halt. (1 minute later...) wow! Says the tank drive, where did these speed bumps come from?
Russian Army will bow down to U.S Army. I was wishing Russia would have done more to start bullshit during the Cold War. Russia was too chicken shit to do anything. I have more respect for China.
Who buys Russian weapons, really??? other then poor countries that have international arms restrictions, so they have to turn to Russian made/designed weapons, which seem to function to a sub-par extent. I'm seeing former Warsaw-pact countries buy western designed weapons because NATO-pact nations arm's are of higher quality and have better engineering methods put into practice. Former Communist Russia nearly destroyed it's own weapons industry by not allowing free enterprise.
@Garduus nay, Russian's arms industry is not destroyed by lack of free enterprise. There was competition among desighners/ producers even in Soviet times. Our arms industry is now being killed by our jewish government who dont really want the army to be strong.
@6opyt I think you are replying to someone else. Pls, re-read my assertion. I can't be "bad informed" cause I live here. Serdyukov- the minister of defence- never had any military experience, - he deliberately converts the army into a force to suppress civil unrest. He eliminates the massive part of officers and academies and everything that can deal with external enemy. Simply because all this jewdoine gang ruling the country after CCCP collapse is installed and controlled by the west.
@Garduus Yeah thats why US troops prefer the AK to the M4 any day of the week. Shoot a hadji pick up their aks throw the m4 in the back and use it. Stfu you dont know what youre saying. Do some research on russian weaponry then blabber off
@8187daytheory You did field research yourself on which battle carbine the U.S. troops prefer? I would like to do my own weapons study, but I don't think any Russian arms manufactures are allowed to import any there military type weapons to the U.S. commercial arms market. And what's a "hadji"???
@Garduus I have buddies who were in Afghanistan and Iraq I myself am a Navy Corpsman....They dont import anything all the taliban use the old AKs from the 79 80 wars
gotta love Russian small arms tech, US guns are usually inferior. I hear the AN94 is a little complicated compared to the AK obviously. they even developed 9x19mm rounds that can punch through standard ceramic armor at close range.
If i had to choose an assault rifle, it would either be a AK74 or a G36 personally.
I'd probs go AK-101 ('cause most countries use NATO standard rounds) or an OTs - 14 Groza 'cause somthing about it is austheticly pleasing to me...... or an F88 ( Steyre AUG A1 made under license in Australia)
Russia today has the best weapons and military in the world. Remember americans IT DOESNT MATTER IF YOU LOOK LIKE CAPTAIN PRICE WITH A ''COOL'' M16 THATS ALL FUTURISITIC IT MATTERS IF THAT WEAPON IF USED WIDELY AND IF THE COUNTRY SELLING IT ALREADY EXPORTS WEAPONS TO THE BIGGEST AND SMALLEST POWERS ON EARTH *COUGH* RUSSIA *COUGH* I MEAN SERIOUSLY NO AMERICAN WEAPON TODAY CAN EVEN COME NEAR TO THE CRAFTSMANSHIP OF THE AN-94 ASSAULT RIFLE OF THE AEK-971 ASSAULT RIFLE OR THE BISON SUBMACHINE GUN!
M16 is shit compared to the obviously superior AK47! Tell me, do 3rd world countries with ruthless and powerful armies choose the m16 as their main weapon? No, they choose the AK47- simply because- it gets shit done. It's cheap, easy to produce, powerful, nearly indestructible and comfortable to use. The m16 barely covers half of it's benefits. Plus being a Russian weapon already gives it the upper hand.
@ComradeChad Let me ask YOU does the 7.62x39 create a larger hole in a man than a 5.56? NO! The 5.56 tumbles out to 400m, creating a larger cavity than a 7.62x39 The 5.56 also fragment inside someone up to 300m The 5.56 has better range than a 7.62x39 and is more accurate. Who the fuck are these 3 world countries? Don't say China they use the new 5.8mm bull pup rifle. Russia uses the AK-74m which fires a smaller round than the M16.
@bazookajoethethird true, a tight group of shots from an m4 will leave a HUGE cavity wound, so the entrance wounds will be small but take a look at the 0ther side ;)
@mohiahmed1 No it takes only one shot for a 5.56mm to make a larger cavity in someone than a 7.62x39 It's all about ballistics. On the INSIDE of a man it "tumbles" and fragments. You might want to look up what the tumble effect is.
@bazookajoethethird Yes i know but more 5.56 bullets will make a larger cavity in tight group then just 1 bullet.....yes i know about the tumbling effect
@bazookajoethethird Funny, because the US are now investing into larger calibre 7.62 NATO rifles, like the SCAR-H, due to the lack of energy in the 5.56mm NATO, which struggles with modern day body armour. It's not a major issue yet, because the US are shooting at men in rags.
@MarkusNemesis Yeah lack of energy. I was referring to the "tumble" effect. 7.62x51 is the 7.62 NATO round, I was talking about the 7.62x39 so I don't know why you said that. The SCAR-H is the only large caliber assault rifle the US thought about making standard issue, most rifles they looked into were 5.56 NATO. What you said hadd nothing to do with what I was talking about so why did you reply?
@ComradeChad You're an idiot I don't know fuck all about guns but its fairly obvious the 3rd world has to use what they can get. Which doesn't work as good proof. Go back to highschool and learn how and what evidence is man.
To all of you people saying "God bless [so and so",
How about "God bless peace"? Or "Can't we just be friends?" Why make more things designed to kill each other, rather than make something to actually help the progress of human civilization?
Да улыбнула передача, оссобенно иосиф линднер в синей рубашке вобще знаток. Пиздит только уши вянут. Про вторую мировую и отсутствие пистолетов пулемётов это прикол, ППШ ППД это что милионы зделали
Нифигасе "Во время войны малая серия пистолетов пулеметов..." . Одних только ППШ выпустили 5,5 миллионов. Еще выпустилиболее миллиона ППСок и, до кучи 400 тысяч ППД. 7 миллионов, ну очень малая партия.
@Ygorij Походу этот тип просто ППШ и ППД, МП40 банально называет автоматом. Или правда верит что воевали только с мосиным, так потери легче списывать. В третей части он Узи автоматом назвал, хер знаит что за клоун.
@FedorovAvtomat Ah well very good.That sure is a cool round and has quite a bit of history behind it! ah how enjoyable to know what it did to the germans hahaha
you seem ignorant, the only fighters inthe world using old rpg are talibans, iraqi insurgents or cechens.russian army uses rpg22 or rpg 27, and these at weap. are able to penetrate modern tanks, also they have very modern at weap.
the last lebanon war israeli tanks were defeated by russian at weap. from russia.
you should have more informations about the argument you wanna talk about before open your mouth.
you should also explain your idea beacuse insulting the other's opinion doesn't prove you are right.
most of the at weap. used by russian force are rpg-22 and rpg 27 the last rpg in service i nthe russia narmy are used in cechen wars simply beacuse they can used that tube to launch an HEAT rocket against infatry, they dont need a new rpg 22 or 27. but if they will ever fight a conventional war they wil lnot use an rpg 7 typical ignorant western brainwashed...
first of all why would use a HEAT warhead against infantry its an anti-tank warhead . its also the type of warheads used in the rpg-22 etc . They use the rpg-7 because it can fire a wide selection of warhead types > Thermobaric , HE-frag , HEAT , Tandem charge Heat & Smoke . Thats why its still used . ps get a bit more knowledge before commenting kid
ha ha heat stands for High Explosive Anti Tank . It will kill infantry but the He-frag is designed for the job . God help you your dump ! cant believe your using the crap info at wikipedia ha ha .
should i have to use your crap info, is a known fact that rpg 7 can be used against infantry with a proper warhead so, jsut a little suggestion, stop oisting bullshit cuz there is a lot of people able to understand how much ignorant you are.there are 2 warhead basically for the rpg 7 , 1 is for vehicle second is for infantry , noob.
@alexandrvasi not ur stupid,if u compare with nearly any other its shit, its cheap,not that effective,it maybe armour peiceing but does not have any accuracy and aint reliable,even the asshole taliban use it,sound rubbish dont ya think....
You have no idea. Its not ineffective against modern battle tanks. Iraqis destroyed 12 Abrams M1A1 with old Warheads with RPG 7. And a few destroyed on IED's.
@Talshet I said my first comment wrongly. An Abrams took 17 RPG's and it did nothing. These are King Tigers of the modern battlefield. An RPG-7 can take out an Abrams if hit from the back. An EFP can take out an abrams, an IED could knock it's tracks off. An RPG-29 could destroy an Abrams. There, the end.
You're wrong. At first the Merkava IV is the King Tiger nowdays. And RPG-7 destroyed 12 tanks that is a fact reported from US soldiers. and this is the end. Face it and stop beeing such pathetic patriot and dont believe all propaganda. The RPG-7 is the most proved and got most killz.
If you search destroyed abrams you can see that they was penetrade from each side. The M1 Abrams have weak reactive armor, only deployed on the sides. And this is not effectiv enough. It doesn't matter how good an armor is people in middle east one of most battle proven guys nowday. They know where to shoot and how.
@tipex12 well the us should be getting a new abrams soon hopfully with better armour but tanks are weak there peak is gone tanks peaked in ww2 as nothing could stop them until portable rpgs
Wrong and wrong, a full power rifle cartridge like the .308(7.62x51) has a higher velocity and a high energy on impact. a heavier bullet is more accurate, yes it drops but it wobbles less and is less likely to be deflected by wind, rain, or foliage.
see it for your self lol... how many rounds you can carry in the battle? and in riality (not games) not allways bigger bullet is accured, even .50cal bmg... .408 in my opinion is best todays sniper round...
My money is on the .338 Lapua, very good range for its class and heavy enough to ensure significant wounding through helmets, glass and body armor. .50s are not usually made match grade, I dont know the specs of the .408
Oh hell yeah. But in performance wise it's much better. And its easier to handle and be made and cheaper then the ak-47 and ak-74 which is standard issue over there.
to 257morg: MP7 имеет кучность гораздо ниже, чем Каштан, и заявлення прицельная дальность mp7 в 200 метров не соответствует реальности. Останавливающее действие патрона сравнимо с патроном Каштаном, но mp7 требует редкий спецпатрон, тогда как Каштан стреляет стандартными патронами.
Работа автоматики mp7 менее надежна, чем Каштана. Стоимость mp7 значительно выше стоимости Каштана. Каштан легче почти на четверть килограмма. И боеприпасы Каштана легче. Каштан превосходит твой mp7 практически по всем показателям.
== I think USA forces know AK-47 the best ,, Vietnam , Korea , Iraq Afganistan ,,, IRAQ now eacefull country , beautifull democracy , great USA puppet state where , 100 people a day die ... ha ha ha ha ... IS this how Democracy is in USA ...
You simply illiterate! You do not even know that Kalashnikovs are constantly improving! In addition, the machine-like appearance on the Kalashnikov rifle, which you saw in this video - NOT Kalashnikovs! What you see - the world's first machine with a balanced automation Isagov's system !
the XM8 failed horribly? its just a G36 clone. from what i've heard/ read its still a reliable weapon (with a few ergonomics problems). but yeah, thats good news about the 416 in 6.8 mm in the works for adoption. i was not aware of that. thanks :)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
AK-47 goes bang every time but can't hit shit past 200 meters. Besides it's a pesants' weapon. Designed for simple peoples to operate. The safety selector is in a bad spot for fast transition from safe to semi, having to pass automatic, in order to aquire and shoot the rifle. Automatic mode is for immediate suppression. Don't believe the hype and go to the range shoot them both then add yout two cents guys.
accuracy and the like is improved with the AK74. the russian military no longer use the AK47, it was surpassed by the AKM and now the AK74 (as the name implies, it was introduced in 1974)
the idea of the selector having semi auto at the bottom is that if semi was in the middle (where auto is) it would be too easy to slip past semi and into auto while leaving safe. much easier to just pull the selector quickly down until it stops (on semi-auto) then click up a notch if automatic fire is needed.
lol no it CAN hit shit!!.. its u who KNOW shit! i bet u never even shot from ak.. so get bend! and its not 200 its 400.. and + russian army use ak 101 103 and 108...
5:01 its a russian richard machowicz
Ironhouse1982 3 weeks ago
IF HE IS SHOOTING A FUCKING AEK-971 HE IS FRICKING RICH THE COST 40K TO SHOOT A MAG FOR 12 SECONDS
TheFrenchZarrior 1 month ago
@TheFrenchZarrior Dude, its the russian government
dwightlight 1 month ago
@dwightlight dude its a TF2 reference XD
mrbeanthe2nd 1 month ago
can someone please add subtitles in english PLEASW i love this series.
firefox8192 1 month ago
устроили здесь срач. Россия рулит и все тут !
Yurielkafa 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the AN 94 assault rifle operating mechanism
youtube.com/watch?v=3JxedhGg7z0
youtube.com/watch?v=Tfw4KIge_y0
If this link is not working, search for "AN 94 operating mechanism of two round burst" and click on the first and second results.
imalchanaka 5 months ago
@Mrthegnomez Dude your 16 stop getting your info from COD and wait till your actually in the Fucking military to even begin to act like you know what your talking about as a member of the armed forces I say wait till your an nco before you go and say stuff chances are you'll be my troop and you'll just be busy using a broom and mop before any other stuffn
XriddimXkillaX 5 months ago
Point is, Russia is not the most powerful country in the world, most of the people that come here and comment on this are war happy soft cod players. Me, a 16 year old kid, Planning to join the US Army, am not the one to say a country sucks, I join because I love my country, I hate my government, But I love my country for what it could be. I will use the weapons I have to use, IT IS NOT THE GUN THAT IS BETTER, IT IS THE SHOOTER! I am an excellent shot, I could take a russian out with a pistol.
MrTheGnomez 5 months ago
@MrTheGnomez yeah yeah keep bragging your training is so so intense without weapons you would surely own a russian soldier
SecretSpetsnaz 4 months ago
@SecretSpetsnaz First off... I never mentioned training, therefor you either have terrible reading skills or listening skills period. Second off, you are way too late, You cannot fathom the amount of fuck in which I do not give at this point. Lastly, yes, yes I can "Own" a Russian soldier, It's not that hard man. Seriously... They roll around on the ground and shit, that's their avoidance tactics... To fucking roll on the ground. I also didn't brag, at all. I also said a pistol, not no weapons.
MrTheGnomez 4 months ago
@MrTheGnomez where did ppl grow such ignorance?
SecretSpetsnaz 4 months ago
@SecretSpetsnaz I think you need to go back to elementary school...
MrTheGnomez 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrTheGnomez oh shut the fuck up you fucking idiot the truth is we all die so fuck off and stop commenting you piece of shit have fun living stupid piece of shit
SecretSpetsnaz 4 months ago
I can make subtitle for this video, if you want me to
9Martel9 6 months ago
O yea we are so strong that the five of us can push this tank to a halt. (1 minute later...) wow! Says the tank drive, where did these speed bumps come from?
MrCargod05 7 months ago
The video compilation "UFO Disclosure A Global Deception Conspiracy " ON
YOUTUBE is a disclosure of major lies + with held information
about life beyond Earth. Footage contains statements
from astronauts, presidents, military personnel, politicians plus
credible news footage. The compilation contains revelations regarding
awareness of free energy technology life beyond Earth along with the
current and ongoing presence which is being hidden from the public + more
Futurecop2012H 8 months ago
Russian Army will bow down to U.S Army. I was wishing Russia would have done more to start bullshit during the Cold War. Russia was too chicken shit to do anything. I have more respect for China.
ARepublicanVictory 8 months ago
@ARepublicanVictory i bet you watched WW2 US version
hellagesoon 8 months ago
Russia. Blue jeans + Black "Bin bag" leather jacket = Gangster with cold war era arms cache under bed.
silver760 9 months ago
да ппц.. америкотам такое показывать низя) они ж на очко присядут)))
еще пишут куйню типа старое .. да епть нет аналогов лошара янки))) пойми ты ))
kz4eva 11 months ago 2
совершенно секретно....че репортеры стыбрили секретные документы чтоли ? или уже их рассекретили?
Airat3 11 months ago
"its not guns that get the job done people do" ex russian speznaz
TheAlexagius 1 year ago
i wish i could speak russian....
Gumpa2 1 year ago 14
@Gumpa2 look up huliganov. a russian who teaches basic russian on you tube. good instructor and funny too
desertdreg 11 months ago
Лента магнитовона вертиться прикольно. "Совершенно секретно...!" ХАХАХА Ржунимагу
Shaitantoo 1 year ago
@Shaitantoo гос тайны по телеку крутят хуле)))))))
Airat3 11 months ago
English please thanx
PlayBoyPabloPablo 1 year ago
@PlayBoyPabloPablo learn Russian)
iOxYGeN90 1 year ago
Why were they trying to stop a tank @ 3:25
SAGEthewisedragon 1 year ago
@SAGEthewisedragon thats revolution/ that people were against it)))
repeatter 11 months ago
In Soviet Russia, recoil feels you!
agumon12 1 year ago
Who buys Russian weapons, really??? other then poor countries that have international arms restrictions, so they have to turn to Russian made/designed weapons, which seem to function to a sub-par extent. I'm seeing former Warsaw-pact countries buy western designed weapons because NATO-pact nations arm's are of higher quality and have better engineering methods put into practice. Former Communist Russia nearly destroyed it's own weapons industry by not allowing free enterprise.
Garduus 1 year ago
@Garduus Russia no longer sells the new stuff. we keep best for ourselves
CCCP1USSR 1 year ago
@Garduus nay, Russian's arms industry is not destroyed by lack of free enterprise. There was competition among desighners/ producers even in Soviet times. Our arms industry is now being killed by our jewish government who dont really want the army to be strong.
DmitryDaren 1 year ago
@DmitryDaren you are bad informed. every country want to be strong and russia have a legacy from CCCP, so, they want to be the most powerfull
6opyt 9 months ago
@6opyt I think you are replying to someone else. Pls, re-read my assertion. I can't be "bad informed" cause I live here. Serdyukov- the minister of defence- never had any military experience, - he deliberately converts the army into a force to suppress civil unrest. He eliminates the massive part of officers and academies and everything that can deal with external enemy. Simply because all this jewdoine gang ruling the country after CCCP collapse is installed and controlled by the west.
DmitryDaren 9 months ago
@Garduus Yeah thats why US troops prefer the AK to the M4 any day of the week. Shoot a hadji pick up their aks throw the m4 in the back and use it. Stfu you dont know what youre saying. Do some research on russian weaponry then blabber off
8187daytheory 9 months ago
@8187daytheory You did field research yourself on which battle carbine the U.S. troops prefer? I would like to do my own weapons study, but I don't think any Russian arms manufactures are allowed to import any there military type weapons to the U.S. commercial arms market. And what's a "hadji"???
Garduus 9 months ago
@Garduus I have buddies who were in Afghanistan and Iraq I myself am a Navy Corpsman....They dont import anything all the taliban use the old AKs from the 79 80 wars
8187daytheory 9 months ago
a bullpup na ? oc-14, oc-03ac, ads dla chego ??
aek bulp toka netu..
kord127 1 year ago
Interesting weapons. But I hope Russia has more stability and better politicians.
SIG551P 1 year ago 12
The bigger problem with the Russian arms is their accuracy, only 4/10 shots will find target.
katerosk 1 year ago
@katerosk Good thing it only takes 1!
S4M10L4 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Il n'y a pas d'AK-47 sans le stg 44 ;)
1eken 1 year ago
Comment removed
1eken 1 year ago
gotta love Russian small arms tech, US guns are usually inferior. I hear the AN94 is a little complicated compared to the AK obviously. they even developed 9x19mm rounds that can punch through standard ceramic armor at close range.
If i had to choose an assault rifle, it would either be a AK74 or a G36 personally.
Elc22 1 year ago
@Elc22
I'd probs go AK-101 ('cause most countries use NATO standard rounds) or an OTs - 14 Groza 'cause somthing about it is austheticly pleasing to me...... or an F88 ( Steyre AUG A1 made under license in Australia)
AmazingDeadThings 1 year ago
SERBIA fight with you against USA , we will attack them in BONDSTEEL their imperial base in Kosovo.
aviomaster 1 year ago
@aviomaster
Wow, an Orthodox Jihad? I thought only Islamists are that big loonies and fans of martidom.
SwineNahNah 1 year ago
En el campo de batalla las armas Rusas son las mas fiables y mejores en general.
dreadnought04 1 year ago
Russia today has the best weapons and military in the world. Remember americans IT DOESNT MATTER IF YOU LOOK LIKE CAPTAIN PRICE WITH A ''COOL'' M16 THATS ALL FUTURISITIC IT MATTERS IF THAT WEAPON IF USED WIDELY AND IF THE COUNTRY SELLING IT ALREADY EXPORTS WEAPONS TO THE BIGGEST AND SMALLEST POWERS ON EARTH *COUGH* RUSSIA *COUGH* I MEAN SERIOUSLY NO AMERICAN WEAPON TODAY CAN EVEN COME NEAR TO THE CRAFTSMANSHIP OF THE AN-94 ASSAULT RIFLE OF THE AEK-971 ASSAULT RIFLE OR THE BISON SUBMACHINE GUN!
Evilsnowman2213 1 year ago 2
In russia, you dont get nametags. Nametags get you.
Fruitfactory 1 year ago
M16 is shit compared to the obviously superior AK47! Tell me, do 3rd world countries with ruthless and powerful armies choose the m16 as their main weapon? No, they choose the AK47- simply because- it gets shit done. It's cheap, easy to produce, powerful, nearly indestructible and comfortable to use. The m16 barely covers half of it's benefits. Plus being a Russian weapon already gives it the upper hand.
ComradeChad 1 year ago 5
@ComradeChad Let me ask YOU does the 7.62x39 create a larger hole in a man than a 5.56? NO! The 5.56 tumbles out to 400m, creating a larger cavity than a 7.62x39 The 5.56 also fragment inside someone up to 300m The 5.56 has better range than a 7.62x39 and is more accurate. Who the fuck are these 3 world countries? Don't say China they use the new 5.8mm bull pup rifle. Russia uses the AK-74m which fires a smaller round than the M16.
bazookajoethethird 6 months ago
@bazookajoethethird true, a tight group of shots from an m4 will leave a HUGE cavity wound, so the entrance wounds will be small but take a look at the 0ther side ;)
mohiahmed1 6 months ago
@mohiahmed1 No it takes only one shot for a 5.56mm to make a larger cavity in someone than a 7.62x39 It's all about ballistics. On the INSIDE of a man it "tumbles" and fragments. You might want to look up what the tumble effect is.
bazookajoethethird 6 months ago
@bazookajoethethird Yes i know but more 5.56 bullets will make a larger cavity in tight group then just 1 bullet.....yes i know about the tumbling effect
mohiahmed1 4 months ago
@bazookajoethethird Funny, because the US are now investing into larger calibre 7.62 NATO rifles, like the SCAR-H, due to the lack of energy in the 5.56mm NATO, which struggles with modern day body armour. It's not a major issue yet, because the US are shooting at men in rags.
MarkusNemesis 4 months ago
@MarkusNemesis Yeah lack of energy. I was referring to the "tumble" effect. 7.62x51 is the 7.62 NATO round, I was talking about the 7.62x39 so I don't know why you said that. The SCAR-H is the only large caliber assault rifle the US thought about making standard issue, most rifles they looked into were 5.56 NATO. What you said hadd nothing to do with what I was talking about so why did you reply?
bazookajoethethird 4 months ago
@ComradeChad You're an idiot I don't know fuck all about guns but its fairly obvious the 3rd world has to use what they can get. Which doesn't work as good proof. Go back to highschool and learn how and what evidence is man.
Zaekk 6 months ago
@ComradeChad Of course of course....xD
Blazerx88x 5 months ago
people it is wrong vid.the armenian smg's hase taken in chechnia and afganistan.
ruben3198 1 year ago
@ekoukano God bless you for saying that.
kertaspaper94 1 year ago
To all of you people saying "God bless [so and so",
How about "God bless peace"? Or "Can't we just be friends?" Why make more things designed to kill each other, rather than make something to actually help the progress of human civilization?
Oh right, because the human race is f***ed.
ekoukano 1 year ago 4
@ekoukano why dnt u ask the country with the most advanced ICBM program...?
Unit88888888 1 year ago
@ekoukano we are fuckt any way so might as wel have som fun destroing ourselves
lordpoison009 6 months ago
3.25 why would u try to push a tank the opposite way
billz094 1 year ago
English please?
ScopedOUT2 1 year ago
WTF is this? And can someone translate
ThePredatorAC1 1 year ago
Да улыбнула передача, оссобенно иосиф линднер в синей рубашке вобще знаток. Пиздит только уши вянут. Про вторую мировую и отсутствие пистолетов пулемётов это прикол, ППШ ППД это что милионы зделали
Mr11110111011 1 year ago
Нифигасе "Во время войны малая серия пистолетов пулеметов..." . Одних только ППШ выпустили 5,5 миллионов. Еще выпустилиболее миллиона ППСок и, до кучи 400 тысяч ППД. 7 миллионов, ну очень малая партия.
Ygorij 1 year ago
@Ygorij Походу этот тип просто ППШ и ППД, МП40 банально называет автоматом. Или правда верит что воевали только с мосиным, так потери легче списывать. В третей части он Узи автоматом назвал, хер знаит что за клоун.
Mr11110111011 1 year ago
@Mr11110111011
Karabas84 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ygorij 1 year ago
is russia still using the 7.62x25 for the pistol and smg cartridge?? sorry just not sure
Joeskateapool 1 year ago
@Joeskateapool
Yes it is highly valued for its penetrative abilities. They chamber the PP-19 for it still.
FedorovAvtomat 1 year ago
@FedorovAvtomat Ah well very good.That sure is a cool round and has quite a bit of history behind it! ah how enjoyable to know what it did to the germans hahaha
Joeskateapool 1 year ago
а что ты считаешь по другому?
1981TormentoR 1 year ago
02:55 ужас что говорит, ППШ от середины войны до конца было массовым оружием.
MrDDFoxtrott 2 years ago 3
а разве не так?
1981TormentoR 1 year ago
good vid needs subtitles
monkeypoo3000 2 years ago 2
My fav weapon. Ak 47 and the best mp5
xRUSSIANMEx 2 years ago
i saw mp5
lXlCommandolXl 2 years ago
@lXlCommandolXl They are fun to shoot, you can rent them at ranges around me.
frylock44 2 years ago
Меня подводит слух? Там сказали:
- История широкого применения ПП началась с 70х???
- Наибольшее распространение получили ... американский ИНГРЕМ ...???
Вот этого новости.
belski01 2 years ago
Это не у нас а в целом в на зпаде
Modest1758 2 years ago
I loooovveeee !!!! RUSSIAN power and WEAPONS
midnightexpress69 2 years ago 78
i love the weapons but sorry there is no Russian power if there is were is it?
lXlCommandolXl 2 years ago
In the FOAB, AK47, VODKA and the People of RUSSIA
TomsGuns 2 years ago
@midnightexpress69 Where r u from?
zeppelin812 1 year ago
@midnightexpress69 I love finnish Rk-95 :D doesn't have anything to do with ur comment but still and i love finnish special forces.
M3ibii 1 year ago
@midnightexpress69 Weapons??....power!!!?????? OMG..xD
Blazerx88x 5 months ago
@'Spankualot'
If wou want consistency with .50 cal, why don't you just buy a press and re-load them yourself ? instant consistency !
GR0UCH0MARXIST 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Lol Russia still use those old Rpg lol they are pretty much just good to explode randomly on something hoping to do some dommage if lucky ^^
sylvainh2o 2 years ago
you seem ignorant, the only fighters inthe world using old rpg are talibans, iraqi insurgents or cechens.russian army uses rpg22 or rpg 27, and these at weap. are able to penetrate modern tanks, also they have very modern at weap.
the last lebanon war israeli tanks were defeated by russian at weap. from russia.
you should have more informations about the argument you wanna talk about before open your mouth.
M1lko01 2 years ago 3
your full of shit the russian army still uses the rpg-7 because with modern warheads its still a cheap and effective weapon .
tipex12 2 years ago 33
you should also explain your idea beacuse insulting the other's opinion doesn't prove you are right.
most of the at weap. used by russian force are rpg-22 and rpg 27 the last rpg in service i nthe russia narmy are used in cechen wars simply beacuse they can used that tube to launch an HEAT rocket against infatry, they dont need a new rpg 22 or 27. but if they will ever fight a conventional war they wil lnot use an rpg 7 typical ignorant western brainwashed...
M1lko01 2 years ago
first of all why would use a HEAT warhead against infantry its an anti-tank warhead . its also the type of warheads used in the rpg-22 etc . They use the rpg-7 because it can fire a wide selection of warhead types > Thermobaric , HE-frag , HEAT , Tandem charge Heat & Smoke . Thats why its still used . ps get a bit more knowledge before commenting kid
tipex12 2 years ago
noobcake there is a warhead made for the rpg 7 which is used against infantry is an heat warhead.
so the onlyone who need more knowledge before talking is you. jesus christ noobs...
you can easy check if my info is right or not, i guess you can sue wikipedia or you can simply find more info by writing rpg 7 on google.
M1lko01 2 years ago
ha ha heat stands for High Explosive Anti Tank . It will kill infantry but the He-frag is designed for the job . God help you your dump ! cant believe your using the crap info at wikipedia ha ha .
tipex12 2 years ago
should i have to use your crap info, is a known fact that rpg 7 can be used against infantry with a proper warhead so, jsut a little suggestion, stop oisting bullshit cuz there is a lot of people able to understand how much ignorant you are.there are 2 warhead basically for the rpg 7 , 1 is for vehicle second is for infantry , noob.
M1lko01 2 years ago
Yes youre right - i think not 2 warheads - more 3 or 4
3dimon3 2 years ago
RPG has got lots of modifications, so just the appearance is similar.
DanLapko 2 years ago
@tipex12 They use the RPG-7V..
hellcatdave1 1 year ago
@tipex12 you stuped boy , РПГ - 7 , RPG - 7 best grenade !
alexandrvasi 1 year ago
@alexandrvasi not ur stupid,if u compare with nearly any other its shit, its cheap,not that effective,it maybe armour peiceing but does not have any accuracy and aint reliable,even the asshole taliban use it,sound rubbish dont ya think....
Hornetman777 1 year ago
@tipex12 Not effective against modern battle tanks at all though. The only man portable launcher that is would be a javelin.
bazookajoethethird 6 months ago
@bazookajoethethird
You have no idea. Its not ineffective against modern battle tanks. Iraqis destroyed 12 Abrams M1A1 with old Warheads with RPG 7. And a few destroyed on IED's.
Talshet 6 months ago
@Talshet I said my first comment wrongly. An Abrams took 17 RPG's and it did nothing. These are King Tigers of the modern battlefield. An RPG-7 can take out an Abrams if hit from the back. An EFP can take out an abrams, an IED could knock it's tracks off. An RPG-29 could destroy an Abrams. There, the end.
bazookajoethethird 6 months ago
@bazookajoethethird
You're wrong. At first the Merkava IV is the King Tiger nowdays. And RPG-7 destroyed 12 tanks that is a fact reported from US soldiers. and this is the end. Face it and stop beeing such pathetic patriot and dont believe all propaganda. The RPG-7 is the most proved and got most killz.
Talshet 6 months ago
@Talshet I was not saying the Abrams actually derived from the King Tiger and I just said an RPG-7 can destroy a tank. Did you not read what i said?
bazookajoethethird 6 months ago
@bazookajoethethird
If you search destroyed abrams you can see that they was penetrade from each side. The M1 Abrams have weak reactive armor, only deployed on the sides. And this is not effectiv enough. It doesn't matter how good an armor is people in middle east one of most battle proven guys nowday. They know where to shoot and how.
Talshet 6 months ago
tell that to US tank crews who had the theyre tanks disabled by them in iraq. still effective against the side and especially the rear of tanks
tipex12 4 months ago
@tipex12 well the us should be getting a new abrams soon hopfully with better armour but tanks are weak there peak is gone tanks peaked in ww2 as nothing could stop them until portable rpgs
TheAlexagius 2 months ago
Obviusly, you've played too much CoD
hotshot331 2 years ago
.223 alot faster than .308 this is fact :) when bullet is faster its more accured...
dfrss 2 years ago
Not sure about that dude .308 is a sniper rifle kind of ammunition.
sylvainh2o 2 years ago
i dont say .223 is best sniper ammo, i say its more accured, but there are much more rounds better than .223 and .308 :D
for example 6.8mm spc, .45acp , .50bmg
dfrss 2 years ago
Wrong and wrong, a full power rifle cartridge like the .308(7.62x51) has a higher velocity and a high energy on impact. a heavier bullet is more accurate, yes it drops but it wobbles less and is less likely to be deflected by wind, rain, or foliage.
spankualot 2 years ago
see it for your self lol... how many rounds you can carry in the battle? and in riality (not games) not allways bigger bullet is accured, even .50cal bmg... .408 in my opinion is best todays sniper round...
dfrss 2 years ago
My money is on the .338 Lapua, very good range for its class and heavy enough to ensure significant wounding through helmets, glass and body armor. .50s are not usually made match grade, I dont know the specs of the .408
spankualot 2 years ago
Russian Future-Weapons! and at 3:00 its Russian Mack!
Chronobeanz 2 years ago
Tyranny. The end result of elitist disarming and enslaving the people. Fuck socialism and fuck OBama!.
blunderbus21 2 years ago
any one who actually shot the Bizon like the bizon?
OEFarredondo 2 years ago
Actual test shown that AEK-971 is better than AN-94.
alongthebluff 2 years ago
In defence AN-94 better, but i prefer AEK-971, it more easy training, production and better in long turn.
Goldrag 2 years ago
Yeah but i think the ak -103 is much better
reallytightpants 2 years ago
at least cheaper (i believe) and the construction is simpler than AEK-971 and AN-94
alongthebluff 2 years ago
Oh hell yeah. But in performance wise it's much better. And its easier to handle and be made and cheaper then the ak-47 and ak-74 which is standard issue over there.
reallytightpants 2 years ago
mini ak47 just mag took from p90 :)
dfrss 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
right, boys... that's the way to stop a tank XD 3:26
what the hell is that idiot thinking lying down, that the tank will stop for him?
MatoVuc 2 years ago
lol
bobtaylor1979 2 years ago
to 257morg: MP7 имеет кучность гораздо ниже, чем Каштан, и заявлення прицельная дальность mp7 в 200 метров не соответствует реальности. Останавливающее действие патрона сравнимо с патроном Каштаном, но mp7 требует редкий спецпатрон, тогда как Каштан стреляет стандартными патронами.
ReDDDgo 2 years ago
Работа автоматики mp7 менее надежна, чем Каштана. Стоимость mp7 значительно выше стоимости Каштана. Каштан легче почти на четверть килограмма. И боеприпасы Каштана легче. Каштан превосходит твой mp7 практически по всем показателям.
ReDDDgo 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
ReDDDgo 2 years ago
Hk MP7 при габаритах сравнимых с Каштаном использует гораздо более мощный патрон.
257morg 2 years ago
8:50 nice tree
sniprzkitty 2 years ago
training didn't look to productive
weerd2normal 2 years ago
DeeJayMiiki is a dude and dumbass!
Cheapness of any arm is one of the main competitive factors especially for arms.
Widely available this gun is because Russion designers know how to build best weapons for low money!
You dude!
Ha-ha-ha!
Neversaygoodbuy 2 years ago
== I think USA forces know AK-47 the best ,, Vietnam , Korea , Iraq Afganistan ,,, IRAQ now eacefull country , beautifull democracy , great USA puppet state where , 100 people a day die ... ha ha ha ha ... IS this how Democracy is in USA ...
aviomaster 2 years ago
Comment removed
dfrss 2 years ago
Not really lol
lundholm4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is all russian no english i dont understand this shit
1000weedUser 2 years ago
You simply illiterate! You do not even know that Kalashnikovs are constantly improving! In addition, the machine-like appearance on the Kalashnikov rifle, which you saw in this video - NOT Kalashnikovs! What you see - the world's first machine with a balanced automation Isagov's system !
Antoncheg77 2 years ago
the aek-971 is the next great assault rifle. i would rather have it than any american thing.
Hinrik91 2 years ago 4
zardoz7899 -- God bless Russian Federation only hope for the FREE PEOPLE ...
aviomaster 2 years ago 7
Horoshiy apparat odnako.
inyach90 2 years ago 3
the xm8 won in the field testing
mrfrankincense 2 years ago
- GOD bless RUSSIA and AK-47 , the best assault rifle on earth .
aviomaster 2 years ago 44
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ak-47 is a crappy gun
zardoz7899 2 years ago
Yes thats why its the most prodused and popular AK in the world. SUCK I BIG DICK FAGGOT
ollonsvin 2 years ago 4
cause its cheap and easy to get ahold of that doesnt mean its a good gun lmao
reglcon1234 2 years ago
tell that to the US armed forces XD
the Ak-47 is the best gun in the world buddy, deal with it
bittemeinrammstein 2 years ago 2
thank you .
ziRexnsk 2 years ago
@aviomaster No, most reliable. The accuracy is pitiful compaired to similar guns. How about God bless the USA, and John Moses Browing.
orbitofdoom16 1 year ago
@orbitofdoom16
Amen brother!
etucker5007 1 year ago
@aviomaster Thanks friend)))
zeppelin812 1 year ago
@aviomaster Russians Don't believe in God.
etucker5007 1 year ago
@etucker5007 sure...tell that to fedor emelianenko
corporacionmonstruo 1 year ago
@corporacionmonstruo
I'm alluding to Communism. It's an atheistic religion. Christians were fiercely persecuted in Russia, so why would God bless it?
He obviously hasn't so far.
I'm not actually saying no Russians believe in God.
etucker5007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@etucker5007 " Communism. It's an atheistic religion"...,sorry,but Communism it´s not a religion,and most of atheist are not communist
corporacionmonstruo 1 year ago
@etucker5007 "I'm alluding to Communism. It's an atheistic religion."....communism it´s not a religion,and most of the atheist are not commies
corporacionmonstruo 1 year ago
The Kashtan really reminds me of the Finnish Jati-Matic SMG except without the slanted profile.
TurbineDogSevenFour 2 years ago
the XM8 failed horribly? its just a G36 clone. from what i've heard/ read its still a reliable weapon (with a few ergonomics problems). but yeah, thats good news about the 416 in 6.8 mm in the works for adoption. i was not aware of that. thanks :)
gsm1091 2 years ago
чё вы надрываетесь? задавайте вопросы я вам расскажу всё... чё к чему =))
Siniy86 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AK-47 goes bang every time but can't hit shit past 200 meters. Besides it's a pesants' weapon. Designed for simple peoples to operate. The safety selector is in a bad spot for fast transition from safe to semi, having to pass automatic, in order to aquire and shoot the rifle. Automatic mode is for immediate suppression. Don't believe the hype and go to the range shoot them both then add yout two cents guys.
nickelhorse76 3 years ago
accuracy and the like is improved with the AK74. the russian military no longer use the AK47, it was surpassed by the AKM and now the AK74 (as the name implies, it was introduced in 1974)
the idea of the selector having semi auto at the bottom is that if semi was in the middle (where auto is) it would be too easy to slip past semi and into auto while leaving safe. much easier to just pull the selector quickly down until it stops (on semi-auto) then click up a notch if automatic fire is needed.
666necrobutcher666 3 years ago 4
lol no it CAN hit shit!!.. its u who KNOW shit! i bet u never even shot from ak.. so get bend! and its not 200 its 400.. and + russian army use ak 101 103 and 108...
valik412350 3 years ago 3
you do know that Russia no longer uses the Ak-47 right?