9/11 Debate: Jon Gold V.S. Pat Curley Part Three

[newsmanbluesman]

Here's a note for Pat Curley - a closing statement in Roberts or any rules of order must be comprised of material raised in the course of the debate - yours was gratuitous and a speaker in the chair would have stopped you. And it's a sure sign, you lost this debate. PS: actually the possible new findings you hypothesize, far from so-whats, would be bomb-shells, and you left out a trace on Atta's $100K - easy work for the FBI to nail down. Left it out, in sudden observance of Robert's Rules.

[sssssjjjj1]

@scottishatheist go watch on youtube>mossad caught in vans on 9-11"filled with explosives" gw bridge>Don't assume you know what's on it.I thought I did.has actual police dispatch radio recording footage of officer speaking to hq describing the van he pulled over before it blew up and the israelis ran and were caught.It shows the cop describing the van,"the van has mural depicting nyc skyline w/jet diving into twin twrs exploding. 30 mins after it happened. Defend that moron. Write me back.

[sssssjjjj1]

these people who defend the gov story after it is so obvious control demo, no wreckage at pentagon, no wreckage at shankesville, no plane hit 7, israelis dancing with van that ACTUALLY had a mural of twin towers with plane hitting them. This is on FBI files. This is outrageous. If you think about this and still think it's immaterial you are a vile individual. The israelis, 4 of them failed polygraph and the 5th refused to take one. Then released to Israeli custody. Wake up we need you!

[ScottishAtheist]

@sssssjjjj1 What I find more outrageous is after 9 years people still make sad claims that there wasn't wreckage at the Pentagon and at Shanksville. When a simple Google search can find lots of photos and testimonials of people who worked on both sites, and had the grim task of recovering body parts.

What's more, they tell you to wake up, when they can't be bothered come up with a plausible alternative, and instead jump on the "New Investigation™" bandwagon and making a fool of themselves.

[scoretosettle]

why is there a debate, the towers were obviously blown up. i wish everyone would grow up

[Claytrainor]

We need some more debates like this.

i'd like to see Gumboot from JREF take on Robert Hordon, a former FAA Controler who wrote Flight protocols for the government.

I think that debate would be extremely productive.

[gamingeh]

Robert hasn't been in NORAD for decades. Why would anyone argue about out of date information?

[Claytrainor]

a very fair point really... can't deny it :-)

[Claytrainor]

That was a pretty solid debate.

I do suspect there was some more corruption on 911 than the official version lets us know but, we gotta dump some of these retarded theories as a movement

WTC1 and WTC2 were NOT controlled demolition. Im still skepticle about 7, but that could just be my own engineering ignorance

The NORAD procedure change on June 6 2001, which somehow brought intercepts to a halt for the summer, including 911 is extremely suspect, and rumsfeld should've been questioned on it.

[Slobbert]

HOW would wtc7 be a demolition unless they were pre-set charges? and if wtc7 had preset charges, why wouldnt WTC1 and 2? becuase building dont just fall down like that dude. EVER.

[gamingeh]

Why do you have a problem with no-planers? The vast majority of 9/11 deniers think no plane hit the Pentagon.

[MrSammo1]

And...it's the only theory a logical person can have.

[grozlz]

no-planers is a deragatory term towards counterintelligence assets such as Nico Haupt (main) who spout the theories that holograms were used and tv fakery was involved in NYC

this has nothing to do with the pentagon, and you know it, you're just a typical dishonest pseudosceptic with typical dishonest arguments.

we see through you.

[gamingeh]

They are people who say the Pentagon footage is faked, even to go so far as to say that the eyewitnesses were paid off.

Again, what makes Nico different from those who think Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon? Both have footage, both have physical evidence of the planes, and both have eyewitnesses.

[grozlz]

Wow, cool! You have footage of the Flight 77 slamming into the Pentagon? Share it with us, stupid tin hat wearing holocaust deniers, please!

You're such a dishonest piece of shit, fuck off.

[Claytrainor]

holocaust deniers?

Now your just slandering!

[grozlz]

wow no wonder JREF moron had to bring Nico Haupt into the discussion.

how low can these pseudosceptics get?

good job Pat, you've failed to convince anyone.

[troyfromwestvirginia]

HI. We're watching you.

[samhouston1886]

Good now go fuck yourself punk.

[samhouston1886]

Good, now go suck a penis.