Hundreds of things in the quran are being proven NOW, with science. Look into that. No offence directed to you nor any atheist, I believe we should all co-exist :)
@TheDjHotTea "Hundreds of things in the quran are being proven NOW, with science."
Like Sura 18:86 "Till, when he reached the setting-place of the sun, he found it setting in a muddy spring, and found a people thereabout. We said: O Dhu'l-Qarneyn! Either punish or show them kindness."
I'm an Atheist, and I believe in reicarnation. Welll I don't really believe in it, but I hope that I'll become another human after I die..... Like Assasins creec man! FUCK YEAH!
@ParadoxEternal I think it's kind of sad that you think the person who isn't talking about demons, satan, and idolators is the one who sounds mad. I mean Satan, seriously? Do you believe the boogeyman will get you if you don't brush your teeth?
@ParadoxEternal Nothing you said makes sense. You didnt offer any proof for why your god is actually different.
I dont see any influences for Christianity's devil, I assume you mean sluts, killers, rapist or something like that. Well no those people are not like that because of demons, sorry.
Wow, just Wow, you sound like a preacher, but you are atheist , i love you, and you also brought up a couple points i have never really thought about before. you sound crazy but you smarter than smart, well done. keep it up.
Just as Dusty has said I have been awaken now to the reality that feelings are for pussies and I am going to kick everyone in the fucking face with my boot of logic from now on. Either lead, follow or get the fuck out of the way of progress. Leave the past exacly where it is in the past. This is 2012 and things today DO NOT APPLY to bronze age thinking. We do not codone slavery, we do not condone females being made to be submisive, we do not condone killing our children for disobedience, ect...
@BigDwarren And you are wrong again, my friend. The Bible was written by God... through Men... big difference. Get your facts straight before keep on slandaring me with words... Thanks.
@timiscool1984 And the only "FACTS" you have to back that up dipshit is that same fucking book. Wow guy. I can not believe you just wrote such a stupid statment, really?
@BigDwarren LOL... such RAGE!!!! Calm down my biologist friend. You should be above this rage... lol. Breath in... now breath out. Breath in... now breath out....
Why is it so wrong for me to have faith that the Bible was written by God? You have faith that previous evolutionists were all knowing and infallible. I don't see a difference here.
One last thing and then I'm done talking to you, (It's not healthy for your blood pressure).
If you get rid of the concept of god, you get rid of a moral authority that convicts you of sin. atheist are atheist because they have moral problems and cant accept a moral authority. I'll be praying for you.
@timiscool1984 And for your last statement, are you kidding me??? I have never knowingly broken a law in my life soooo I obay and accept our local and governent authority. FAILED LOGIC AGAIN. I am not an anarchist. I do not push back to authority, I served 3 years in the Army till I was injured and medicaly retired and that payed my way through college. Please I beg you grow up and use your brain before making stupid statements that are baseless and innacurate.
@timiscool1984 Faith is the excuse given for things known WITHOUT evidence. I have evidence for evolution , faith is not needed. I can make predictions and make models based on the theory. If evolution is wrong then everything I do would come out wrong, but guess what, it doesn't. FAILED LOGIC AGAIN, wow you are not doing well here Mr. Cool.
@timiscool1984 you should stick your prayers in your fairy tale believing stupid ass. get off this web site and go find yourself a bullshit christian site with the rest of the brain washed morons
@timiscool1984 Trust me I am calm. I can not stop laughing long enough to be upset, but love you too my friend and hope you grow out of this thing that makes you stuck in the past and join us in the future. I only use those kind of words like, Georege Carlin did, to express the magnitude of my statements. And plz pray for yourself, you need it more than me.
@timiscool1984 Are you really that mentaly challenged that you write "The Bible was written by God... through Men... " THROUGH MEN as you said man is fallible. Wow guy just wow.
@BigDwarren You are placing your life in the hands of men that told you they were speeking for god and you just eat it up, still not see the flawed logic?
@timiscool1984 Morality is subjective to the times dumbass thats why it HAS CHANGED THREW THE YEARS. We once thought slavery was a good thing and guess what NOW WE DON'T. Grr how can a human be this stupid.
@timiscool1984 The last thing on the face of this planet that is NOT moral is a fucking book writen by men in the BRONZE age telling us in 2012 what we should or should not be doing. How hard is that to comprehend? Grow up and join us in the fucking future. Move forward NOT backwards.
One last thing, YES we have seen things evolve both in labs AND the histoical fossil record. Your logic is totally flawed in every aspect there Mr. Cool and by the way sinner, I would change my name to something that does not project vanity (deadly sin), look it up.
@timiscool1984 Flawed logic from the start there Mr. Cool lol. Guess what, no one has ever seen a "monkey" evolve into a "human" is because thats not how evolution works you small minded twat. Read a fucking book lol. So sad I live in a world that the most simple things seem to be the toughest to grasp. We have a comon acestor that us and apes evolved from and we have found that link, but people like you are way to bright to even see whats right infront of your face. Sorry for your ignorance.
@BigDwarren and again... "small minded twat." People like you are a disgrace to the world of debates and intellegent arguments. Please, enlighten me... exactly how does evolution work? I'm assuming you have seen it with your own eyes. Or are you just believing in something that someone else has written about... man, that sounds a lot like believing in Jesus Christ... who someone else has written about... ROFL!!!!!
@timiscool1984 All I ever see on here from creationists is please explain evolution to me so I understand, ie. Ray Comfort. It has been explained to you a thousand times. So it has to be that you are mentaly challenged or just a liar which are you? Because all the facts and evidence point toward common ancestry. "Even if there were NO fossil record, DNA alone proves common ancestry". Fancis Collins, biologist AND devout evangelical christian. Write him he can explain it in your terms.
"Remember that you are an atheist as long as you do not believe a deity exists." is something you said and I responded to that. Sorry if I might have misunderstood you. I have been called an atheist based on what I explained to you. The reasoning goes that since Christians believe in one God, but atheists believe in none, Christians are atheists as well for simply believing in one less god.
@mrtadreamer Not all of them. In fact, most atheists aren't like that at all, and, I can't speak for every atheist, but I find those atheists to be kinda dumb, because if they believe with certainty that there is no god, I have to ask them: Prove it. If you can prove there is no god, then by all means, do so. But you can't know with certainty anything. You can't know if there is, or isn't a god with ANY amount of certainty at all.
@mrtadreamer Actually that makes me an agnostic atheist. All agnostic means is a - without, Gnostic - Knowledge. I am without knowledge that God exists. a - without. Theist - Belief. So, I don't know he exists, and I don't believe.
If you were someone who knopws god exists, and you believe in him, you are a Gnostic Theist. If you believe in him, but you don't know for sure, you are an Agnostic Theist. If you know there is no god, and don't believe in him, you are a Gnostic atheist.
@mrtadreamer You forgot a word. That would him/her an agnostic...atheist. Remember that you are an atheist as long as you do not believe a deity exists. Recognizing that it is possible for a god to exists, doesn't affect one's atheist status. After all, it is possible that magical pink, invisible unicorns exist, but that doesn't mean people actually believe they do
@1Lanavis1 Do your home work. In the first century, the Romans called the early Christians atheists because they didn't believe in the many pagan Roman gods. With the recent resurgence of such paganist notions by the so-called new atheists, the attempt is being made again to label Christians 'atheists". As for the Gospel, nowhere in the Bible are Chrisiens called "atheists." In the Book of Acts, it recounts that we were first called Christians at Antioch Acts 11:26.
@mrtadreamer Read what I am writing. You are not answering my comments correctly at all! I never said Christians were atheists or said that I agree with the Romans or even mention the Romans at all before you did. WTF is your problem. I'm talking about the differences in the Gospels, not what Christians were called back then! Use your eyes to read not to judge.
Fairy Tales... sure this retard realizes that these "fairy tales" have been written about on Cave walls or in old books. Surely this retard realizes that Christians don't belive that "magic" created cars or any of the other materialistic things he brought up. Surely this retard realizes that without an omnipotent being to set guidelines and morals, then there would be way to distinguish between what is good or evil. This is just a guy who gets a high on screaming and hearing his own voice.
@timiscool1984 You need to be told what is the difference between good and evil? weird..l don't. If that's the case please keep believing in fairy tales.
@Da40kOrks Um... have you had any education outside of grade school? Have you once taken ANY form of philosophy class where they teach you about the different teachings of scholars and philosophists... much of whom weren't Christians? Whether you choose to do what's right based off of what "feels" good to you or based off of what is best for a "group" of people is called choosing between types of philosophies. However, one thing remains the same between each...
@Da40kOrks Each philosophy... and there are a lot of them... are based on the societies that you live in. There are many cultures in the world (mostly middle eastern) that believe FGM is completely acceptable. Hopefully, anyone that is reading this would see that it is a complete violation of someone's rights and down right inhumane. The difference is... in OUR society, FGM is not ok. FGM would be considered a violation of rights and is therefore illegal... continued...
@Da40kOrks In the contries that carry out the FGM practices, it is morally accepted by society. Keep in mind that the main reason FGM is carried out is because it is said to bring more sexual satisfaction to men while copulating. So, here we are... two different societies with 2 different opinions of what is right or wrong. At what point did these societies decide that it was "ok" to do something like this? Continued...
@Da40kOrks Who was the person that decided that it was not Ok to do this and where did they get their beliefs from? Surely someone has an answer for that. So, to answer your question... do I need someone to tell me the difference between right and wrong? Absolutely! If a distinction was never created between what was right or wrong then anyone locked up in jail should be set free, FGM should be carried out worldwide, and punishment should not be a word.
@Da40kOrks I personally believe that Jesus Christ (Who has been accepted as a philosopher) was sent to this earth to spread a new set of teachings. What is so wrong with the Bible and the teachings it renders. As the Son of God, Christ was the megaphone for God's voice. Christ spread the word and distinguished between what was right or wrong. Some people chose to follow him, and some didn't. Hence... many different philosophies/beliefs.
@timiscool1984 Authority is not, nor can it ever be, morality. It is tyranny. Which is what the god of the bible is, a tyrant. His morality boils down to "do what I say not what I do..or else." This is NOT morality in any way, shape or form. Because you will always come up against they Euthyphro dilemma.
Apologists will play endless word games and literally make shit up, basically to whatever they can to get around it..and fail every time.
@Da40kOrks You are complety. Wrong... it's not and never has been a... do what I say or else. There has ALWAYS been a choice... whether you choose to take it is completly up to you. Also, if we were to go by that logic... then any laws known to man would be considered tyranny. How is different if God punished because of misbehavior, than being sent to jail because of failure to obey laws? Also, since when did I ever say anything about authority? 10 Commandments = Laws
@timiscool1984 Ya great response. Follow the tyrant or go to hell, great choices. Infinite punishment for finite crimes. And which of the hundreds of different GODS laws are right, Jews, Christian, Sharia? I hope you have made the right choice there Mr.Cool, or you get the same treatment;-). The best choice is ALWAYS to just live your life and do all you can to do more good than harm to the world around you. Anyone, GOD or not that demands worship does not deserve it.
@BigDwarren And again, we are back to the concept of... who determines what is right and wrong?>>> I question which you evaded a few posts ago. That is funny thing about arguing/debating the origin of morality with agnostics/atheists. They always find a way to divert the attention away from stuff they can't answer with "scientific proof". It's almost a waste of my time to debate with people like that... yet I can't get away from it... not sure why.
@timiscool1984I will say this. I do recognize you are searching for answers. But, your way of goin about it is off. I know you can not see it I use to not be able to see the other side myself. Evolution is not out to destroy God. It is out to destroy ignorance. If knowledge is what you aspire I can help the same as you can help me with things I don't understand. I apologize for being terse and blount with you, but it does upset me to see these kind of arguments that are baseless and inaccurate.
@timiscool1984 Also FYI I am a biologist in the medical field and I do see evolution in germs and bacteria every day. Also I have visited museums to see the fossil record for myself, you can too. So again your logic is flawed. It took many years of study and hard work to get where I am and it makes me out of my mind to see someone skew the facts and bring up all these tired, disproven talking points from creationists.
@BigDwarren Also, by calling my God (or any God) "A Tyrant" leads me to believe that you do in fact believe there is a God. If this is not the case, then you are a true nut-case calling something/someone names when/if they don't exist. That would be like my 4 year old daughter talking to her friend Jenny right next to her even though there is no one obviously there.
@timiscool1984 And I may be wrong if I am plz anyone correct me but you called me the nut-case first lol. SOOOO you were saying and I quote "If this is not the case, then you are a true nut-case calling something/someone names when/if they don't exist" and "People like you are a disgrace to the world of debates and intellegent arguments". Can you not see the flawed logic in all your statements from start to finish? Come on guy you have to grow out of this.
@BigDwarren Excuse me? I was quoting our dear friend up in the video above that started this whole debate... Haha. It was you who went on the offensive. Not to mention, you have still failed to explain to me how evolution works? You>>>Yourself>>> have NOT seen the evolution of humanity with your own eyes. Congratulations though, what you have seen is the rapid change of germs/bacteria. This rapid change is so far off from evolution that I don't see how you can compare the two.
As for fossil records... someone somewhere decided the "time frame" for what fossils would be based off. How do we know that this time frame is accurate? No one was around billions of years ago... like Scientists seem to think. The Bible tells stories that back no more than 6000 years ago. Guess what... the earliest forms of recorded history started about 6000 years ago. Coincedence? No! You know why? Because there was no history to record before that point... there was no history!
@timiscool1984 UNFORTUNATELY there is no excuse for you anymore and I did explain evolution to you. You just can not see the forest for the trees. Francis Collins will tell you all you need to know look it up, (thats sarcasm , I know you have seen his videos you just want to be a troll). Sorry to everyone for feeding him but I can not stand stupidity.
If you haven't seen the evolution of humanity, then you ARE forced to put faith in the infallible humans (or "scientists" before you) that the world deemed "intellegent." This is the same corrupt world that used God's Will during the crusades. The same world that allowed someone like Hitler reign. The same world that allowed Obama to become president... Clearly, our world makes mistakes. We are, after all, human.
Kudos to you and your degree, but have you ever run across an All-knowing proffessor who has all kinds of degrees/recognitions who you disagreed with? I have... Not everyone is perfect. Yet, you still must choose to believe in these humans/scientists/evolutionists and with that... their margin of error. No thanks... I will NEVER put my faith in another human!
@timiscool1984 No and you have never ran across an all-knowing pasture either dipshit and you may have been lead down the wrong path which is the entire point. Your bible was writen by men you retard so yes you do trust in just what MEN have writen in that book LMAO. You are so blind.
Faith in god is like believing you can run through brick walls. so Christians, put your faith to test . try and run through brick walls head 1st =D maybe you'll wake up then?! i hope so. lol
@TyeDye07 No it's not. I believe in God and I stubbed my toe on a wall once. Believing in God doesn't give you super-powers, it gives you eternal life.
@dude33ism your not understanding. you totally missed the FULL point of what im trying to say. so let me break it down for you sir/mam lol you know you can't actually run through a wall but when you put your faith to test you believe you can... just like god. you know he doesn't exist . so you use the whole faith thing as an excuse to believe. FAITH is your TOOL(excuse) for everything.
@TyeDye07 Know I know God exists hence the point of my faith. And I don't believe I can run threw a wall. I have put my faith to the test by trying to tell you about mine. Your faith in an explosion out of nothing is like walking into the middle of a busty highway and saying "I won't get hit because I don't believe in trucks!"
@dude33ism Lol wow dood your logic is all bent. science is reason and evidence. not just people making stuff up and believing what you CANT see smell touch or hear lol you cant make me believe im Atheist you should convert. i believe the SUN is the real god. please dont call me crazy. please dont! becus i could call you and every other christian crazy for soooo many reason... but yeah bigbang theory is the reason were here on this earth,,,,
@TyeDye07 I could also call you crazy too. Explosion coming out of nothing and coincidence and random chance leading to a perfect earth with perfect sustainable conditions to sustain life with no reason. But since I don't need an argument I'm going to settle our differences and move on with life believing in a reason for being while you don't have to if you don't want.
@dude33ism you act like it All happened in 7 days... man this it toook billions of years,. big bang is not from nothin its a collide of 2 things and what came about is planets. who created all the other planets theres soooo many planets did your god create them all and decided to put people on earth cmon man you sound crazy lol but dood just continue believing in your god and i will continue to be free thinking rationally with Logic and reason. while you rely on your faith and a book lol peace!
@TyeDye07 Yes he did I do believe in pangea. God gathered the land in one place in Genesis. The when the flood happened the springs of the deep burst forth spewing water and breaking the continents separating them which is why they look like puzzle pieces. I believe earthquakes are caused not only by tectonics but also by the continents continuing to settle in their new locations. And what where those 2 things that collided causing the big bang? Where did you say they came from?
@dude33ism "Explosion coming out of nothing and coincidence and random chance leading to a perfect earth with perfect sustainable conditions to sustain life with no reason."
Most of our planet is uninhabitable. The vast vast majority of species that evolved on our planet have gone extinct. This is not a perfect earth..we live on a climatic knife edge.
The 'big bang' wasn't an 'explosion'.
If there was a designer, they are incompetent and callous.
@AtheistPowerlifter Most of our planet is uninhabitable? Even though we are in severe overpopulation? And all the species that have micro-evolved on our planet have gone extinct due to something as natural as death. This earth is not a perfect world I see that...but it is the only planet with perfect enough conditions to support life. I don't see how random chance can cause this. I just don't. I just find it scientifically impossible for a Big Bang or anything to come from nothing.
@dude33ism Yes humans have overpopulated...this is a huge problem BECAUSE 90% of the earths surface cannot be inhabited by humans...oceans, deserts, etc.
Whether you want to accept the randomness of the universe matters not...it is what it is. There is no purpose...no 'why'. Our human brains try to seek patterns and purpose- but there is none beyond what we make/invent.
For me this does not detract from the wonder and beauty of life. We live, we die, that's it. Enjoy it.
@heryop Well I do believe that scientists have found fossilized woolly mammoths with food still in there mouths. So i'm guessing the "ice age" happened a lot quicker than we think. I believe that when the flood happened, water and debris swept across the globe fossilizing and even freezing animals as fast as instantaneously. I have a comeback for everything. The Bible cant contradict itself, not once. Do some more research before spouting your mouth off about something you don't even know about.
@AtheistPowerlifter Really? The 4 Gospels all have the same story. He was crucified from the 6th hour to the 9th hour.
He died while saying "Father into your hands I give you my Spirit.
Each Gospel agree's that Mary went to the tomb though none of them state which Mary it is. And then Matthew and Luke name more visitors. But they all agree that Mary was there but the other Gospels just name the other people that went as well.
And they were angels because the 4 Gospels all say there were.
@dude33ism They have the same story, but with different details like with the number of angels for one. Any contradiction despite how small it is, IS STILL A F-ING CONTRADICTION!
@dude33ism "Everything coming from nothing & life from a blob of non-living crap...totally logical."
Though what you said is a mischaracterization (look up Lawrence krauss and this abiogenesis vid: watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg)..what you said is more logical than: a magic man (our image) who is eternal made everything (even though he is more complicated than everything) out of nothing by poofing it into existence to subsequently destroy it via flood and then sacrifice himself...and on...
i believe our existance is circumstantial. we are subject to the environment that preceeded us. and if you otherwise didn't exist you certainly wouldnt be questioning it. namely, its in our nature to question, but truth is impartial to what may be more appealing for most.
You don't believe in nothing. You believe there is no god. you cant prove he does not exist yet you believe he isn't there. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. The multiverse? really? please throw more hypotheticals into your argument. You throw the word science at everything when, by definition, it cant prove god doesn't exist. Nothing you spout is close to "logic". the scientific minded, who are honest and looking for answers, choose agnosticism. Not your faith based hate preach.
@SocialDiseaseTV Atheists dont believe there is no god because atheism is a rejection of a statement that there is one, not a religious position. Atheism doesnt even state that there is no god, the statement is that we think that the possibility of there is a god is lower than 50%(and thats what agnosticism is all about - agnostics dont have a position or religion, while atheists have). And the statement that the possibility is lower than 50% is actually based on science.
@SocialDiseaseTV and the scientific facts, such as the age of the universe and Earth(no 6000 y.o. world), the evolution(no Adam and Eve), the form of the Earth(it's stated in the bible that Earth is flat), also on the fact that stories told in the bible, like Noa's ark and tower of Babyl, do not actually correspond to reality, and more of that - we have the history of how the christianity was created, like how "Christ's blood and flesh" was taken from pagan's religions
@SocialDiseaseTV and on top of that - yes, no evidence for god' existence. At. All.
If you say that just the absence of evidence itself is good enough to believe in something, then why God? Why not spagetti monster, Santa or pink unicorn - they have the exact same level of trustworthiness as bible's God has.
Because the critical thinking does not work in a way of exepting something as a truth only because it isnt proven that it doesnt exist.
@SocialDiseaseTV And in the way that agnostics tend to think, the possibility of each god to exist is equal. Allah, Zeus and others - they have the same chance as bible's god has. And there cant be all the gods at once because they contradict each others. So if all the gods have the chance to exist, the chance of there be one certain god is far less then 50%.
This is far from all what I can present you with, I can just say that it's well written in "God's delusion" if you mind readnig it.
@SocialDiseaseTV And if you say that the scientific minded, who are honest and looking for answers, choose agnosticism, then why so many leading scientists are atheists? Just saying.
And seriously, Thor or Odin have better concept than God. So even if you go as far as believing in something that wasn't proven and which possibility of existence is lower than 50%, then why not pick some cool guy rather than God which demands you to kill those who work on sunday.
@DemimondXXIII bad argument. I didn't bring up god, the bible doesn't say the earth is flat.You, like so many atheists are trying your hardest to get around the definition. you say the critical thinkers don't accept things that aren't proven, then cite evolution. Leading scientists only claim to be atheist after changing the definition. Dawkins says in the god delusion he's 6th level agnostic (7th is atheism) by a scale he invented. Your percentages are made up and Dawkins is a poor philosopher.
@DemimondXXIII speaking of misinterpretations you mean Isaiah 22:18 hebrew, "dwur". Definition 1: ball, circle. Oxford English Dictionary : Atheism Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god. Why are you still calling it evolution THEORY if it's "100%" proven? index fossils? Cambrian explosion? Alot of people have converted both ways, your lack of "knowing any" isn't a valid or compelling argument. There are scientists that look at the evidence and come to very different conclusions.
@SocialDiseaseTV If you use Oxford English Dictionary, then search up what scientific theory is. Protip: it' something that's been proven to work. Gravity is also still called a theory, you know. And what about Cambrian explosion? Wasnt it already explained as a part of evolutionarey process when living organisms adapted tp oxygen which alloed more lifeforms to exist? And even more so, look what is the time period of cembrian explosion.
@SocialDiseaseTV And I dont say that critical thinkers don't accept things that aren't proven, I said(quote): "critical thinking does not work in a way of exepting something as a truth only because it isnt proven that it doesnt exist". In other words, no evidence AT ALL=no trustworthliness. even when evolution wasnt 100% proven it had a pile of evidence supporting it.
Sorry to put it out but you tried to misinterpretate me.
@SocialDiseaseTV and if scientists exept atheism only after changing the definition, then what is your definition of atheism and why do you think you know better than atheists what it actually is? I mean, almost all the atheists were religious one time in their life, but I cant name 1 single religious person who was an atheist before exepting some sort of religion. And what about scientists changing definitions, in examples, please?
@SocialDiseaseTV You bought into creationist interpretation? Dawkins clearly states that Eartj lifeforms can be brought outside the planet by aliens, but that doesnt deny the need to explain where those aliens came from. Sorry but you hear only what you want to hear.
@DemimondXXIII you referred to the bible being based off of pagan religions? does this mean you bought into zeitgeist? this sounds like you're angry and on a soapbox.you said most atheists were religious before? (id say they're religious now) but what did you go through? you've accepted what you want to hear and did no fact checking. you aren't interested in the science you claim to cling too. most critical thinking atheists wouldn't back some of the claims you've made here. Did Jesus exist?
@SocialDiseaseTV I dont even know what zitgeist is. For example, Christ demanding to eat his flesh and drink his blood is taken from the pagan religions, etc.
You say that atheists are religious? Prove how.
I gone trough education before I became atheist, and you are just thworing shit on me with unproven statements about how Im interested in science, sir. And what about fact cheking, for example?
And what "claims" of which I made here, "most critical thinking atheists wouldn't back"?
@SocialDiseaseTV Isaiah 22:18 hebrew: He will surely wind you around and around, and throw you like a ball into a large country. There you will die, and there the chariots of your glory will be, you shame of your lord's house.
Where is the mention of sphere or circle? I meant Isaiah 40:22 "It is he that sitteth upon the circle
of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in."
@SocialDiseaseTV and the original of word for circle there is chuwg, which is translated as flat circle, like a coin. No sphere mentioned. Look, I underestand that ancient lexicon might be lucking the ways to explain stuff, but if bible was meant to say that earth is a sphere, why then people thought that Earth is flat untill Magellan proven it's a fricking sphere and why was it translated as a circle?
And pardon me but you sound angry and mad with all that unverified assumptions you make.
It's really, really fucking bizarre to see and hear someone with such a pronounced Southern accent being so logical, factual and scientific. Like, fuck! Kudos to you, sir.
you are amazing! :D i love your videos! you should give all your speeches about christians in churches then maybe they'll open there fucking eyes...or they might just say get the fuck outta gods house lol
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Anyone who uses "kinds" as a biology term doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to entropy. Stay out of science, you clearly aren't qualified to talk about it. No scientist points to the supernatural origin of the universe, at least not in their peer reviewed research. You're literally talking out of your ass.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
SCIENCE DOESN'T EXPLAIN AWAY GOD: Natural laws may explain how an airplane or living cell works, but mere undirected natural laws cannot explain the origin of either. Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as flawed or useless.
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations produced having survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
AMINO ACIDS CAN HAPPEN BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Read my popular Internet articles, "How Forensic Science Refutes Atheism," "Origin of Life Deception by Evolutionists," "Any Life On Mars Came From Earth."
INTELLIGENT DESIGN DEBATE: If you discovered a sand castle on a lonely beach, you can't prove it was made by either chance or design. No one observed its origins. Either it was designed or the random forces of wind and waves made the castle. You didn't find fingerprints. Did the wind wipe the fingerprints away? How do we know that there were fingerprints in the first place? By chance or by design? Both sides should present their case. Read the article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of transitional forms and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
You cant have a logical argument with someone who doesn't recognize logic!
JkAllDayHills 13 hours ago
God is science.
Umad?
Razer1103 13 hours ago
Hundreds of things in the quran are being proven NOW, with science. Look into that. No offence directed to you nor any atheist, I believe we should all co-exist :)
TheDjHotTea 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheDjHotTea "Hundreds of things in the quran are being proven NOW, with science."
Like Sura 18:86 "Till, when he reached the setting-place of the sun, he found it setting in a muddy spring, and found a people thereabout. We said: O Dhu'l-Qarneyn! Either punish or show them kindness."
johnrainrules 3 days ago
I'm an Atheist, and I believe in reicarnation. Welll I don't really believe in it, but I hope that I'll become another human after I die..... Like Assasins creec man! FUCK YEAH!
WhAtStHeMaTtErMan 1 week ago
dude i love you rofl.... you say everything i want to say to these damn Christians
hayvn2312 2 weeks ago
"Atheists believe in nothing" is just another hear-say "derp-quote" passed on from one ill-informed religious anti-atheist, to the next.
FunkyWhitePimp 2 weeks ago 3
FUCK atheists
wodcraszykid 2 weeks ago
@ParadoxEternal I think it's kind of sad that you think the person who isn't talking about demons, satan, and idolators is the one who sounds mad. I mean Satan, seriously? Do you believe the boogeyman will get you if you don't brush your teeth?
Snakepliskinist 2 weeks ago
@ParadoxEternal Nothing you said makes sense. You didnt offer any proof for why your god is actually different.
I dont see any influences for Christianity's devil, I assume you mean sluts, killers, rapist or something like that. Well no those people are not like that because of demons, sorry.
Oldcartoons571 2 weeks ago
FUCK YES!! YOU SIR JUST EARNED YOURSELF 1 SUBSCRIPTION!
Assassin9531 3 weeks ago
dusty says shit you are the most stupid man in the world
iamBBOYOMAR 1 month ago
Wow, just Wow, you sound like a preacher, but you are atheist , i love you, and you also brought up a couple points i have never really thought about before. you sound crazy but you smarter than smart, well done. keep it up.
beerwalla 1 month ago
Comment removed
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Just as Dusty has said I have been awaken now to the reality that feelings are for pussies and I am going to kick everyone in the fucking face with my boot of logic from now on. Either lead, follow or get the fuck out of the way of progress. Leave the past exacly where it is in the past. This is 2012 and things today DO NOT APPLY to bronze age thinking. We do not codone slavery, we do not condone females being made to be submisive, we do not condone killing our children for disobedience, ect...
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Comment removed
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@BigDwarren And you are wrong again, my friend. The Bible was written by God... through Men... big difference. Get your facts straight before keep on slandaring me with words... Thanks.
timiscool1984 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 And the only "FACTS" you have to back that up dipshit is that same fucking book. Wow guy. I can not believe you just wrote such a stupid statment, really?
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@BigDwarren LOL... such RAGE!!!! Calm down my biologist friend. You should be above this rage... lol. Breath in... now breath out. Breath in... now breath out....
Why is it so wrong for me to have faith that the Bible was written by God? You have faith that previous evolutionists were all knowing and infallible. I don't see a difference here.
timiscool1984 1 month ago
One last thing and then I'm done talking to you, (It's not healthy for your blood pressure).
If you get rid of the concept of god, you get rid of a moral authority that convicts you of sin. atheist are atheist because they have moral problems and cant accept a moral authority. I'll be praying for you.
timiscool1984 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 And for your last statement, are you kidding me??? I have never knowingly broken a law in my life soooo I obay and accept our local and governent authority. FAILED LOGIC AGAIN. I am not an anarchist. I do not push back to authority, I served 3 years in the Army till I was injured and medicaly retired and that payed my way through college. Please I beg you grow up and use your brain before making stupid statements that are baseless and innacurate.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timiscool1984 Faith is the excuse given for things known WITHOUT evidence. I have evidence for evolution , faith is not needed. I can make predictions and make models based on the theory. If evolution is wrong then everything I do would come out wrong, but guess what, it doesn't. FAILED LOGIC AGAIN, wow you are not doing well here Mr. Cool.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 you should stick your prayers in your fairy tale believing stupid ass. get off this web site and go find yourself a bullshit christian site with the rest of the brain washed morons
lnkintx80 1 month ago in playlist More videos from CultOfDusty 2
@timiscool1984 You're retarded
Ender4Ever 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 i'll be fucking bitches on the street whilst you pray! <3
willbo26 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 Trust me I am calm. I can not stop laughing long enough to be upset, but love you too my friend and hope you grow out of this thing that makes you stuck in the past and join us in the future. I only use those kind of words like, Georege Carlin did, to express the magnitude of my statements. And plz pray for yourself, you need it more than me.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Comment removed
BigDwarren 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timiscool1984 Are you really that mentaly challenged that you write "The Bible was written by God... through Men... " THROUGH MEN as you said man is fallible. Wow guy just wow.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@BigDwarren You are placing your life in the hands of men that told you they were speeking for god and you just eat it up, still not see the flawed logic?
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Comment removed
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Comment removed
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@BigDwarren And again, question diverted and the result is more slanderous remarks and insults... SO classy...
timiscool1984 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timiscool1984 Morality is subjective to the times dumbass thats why it HAS CHANGED THREW THE YEARS. We once thought slavery was a good thing and guess what NOW WE DON'T. Grr how can a human be this stupid.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timiscool1984 The last thing on the face of this planet that is NOT moral is a fucking book writen by men in the BRONZE age telling us in 2012 what we should or should not be doing. How hard is that to comprehend? Grow up and join us in the fucking future. Move forward NOT backwards.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
One last thing, YES we have seen things evolve both in labs AND the histoical fossil record. Your logic is totally flawed in every aspect there Mr. Cool and by the way sinner, I would change my name to something that does not project vanity (deadly sin), look it up.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Comment removed
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 Flawed logic from the start there Mr. Cool lol. Guess what, no one has ever seen a "monkey" evolve into a "human" is because thats not how evolution works you small minded twat. Read a fucking book lol. So sad I live in a world that the most simple things seem to be the toughest to grasp. We have a comon acestor that us and apes evolved from and we have found that link, but people like you are way to bright to even see whats right infront of your face. Sorry for your ignorance.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@BigDwarren and again... "small minded twat." People like you are a disgrace to the world of debates and intellegent arguments. Please, enlighten me... exactly how does evolution work? I'm assuming you have seen it with your own eyes. Or are you just believing in something that someone else has written about... man, that sounds a lot like believing in Jesus Christ... who someone else has written about... ROFL!!!!!
timiscool1984 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 All I ever see on here from creationists is please explain evolution to me so I understand, ie. Ray Comfort. It has been explained to you a thousand times. So it has to be that you are mentaly challenged or just a liar which are you? Because all the facts and evidence point toward common ancestry. "Even if there were NO fossil record, DNA alone proves common ancestry". Fancis Collins, biologist AND devout evangelical christian. Write him he can explain it in your terms.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Atheists complain that Christians don't listen to them. The reason for that is because Christians are too busy listening to God.
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
"Remember that you are an atheist as long as you do not believe a deity exists." is something you said and I responded to that. Sorry if I might have misunderstood you. I have been called an atheist based on what I explained to you. The reasoning goes that since Christians believe in one God, but atheists believe in none, Christians are atheists as well for simply believing in one less god.
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
I can't but like all your videos.
1Lanavis1 2 months ago
Atheists believe in their hearts, "There is no God."
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
@mrtadreamer Not all of them. In fact, most atheists aren't like that at all, and, I can't speak for every atheist, but I find those atheists to be kinda dumb, because if they believe with certainty that there is no god, I have to ask them: Prove it. If you can prove there is no god, then by all means, do so. But you can't know with certainty anything. You can't know if there is, or isn't a god with ANY amount of certainty at all.
Daniel800 2 months ago
@Daniel800 Then that would make you an agnostic.
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
@mrtadreamer Actually that makes me an agnostic atheist. All agnostic means is a - without, Gnostic - Knowledge. I am without knowledge that God exists. a - without. Theist - Belief. So, I don't know he exists, and I don't believe.
If you were someone who knopws god exists, and you believe in him, you are a Gnostic Theist. If you believe in him, but you don't know for sure, you are an Agnostic Theist. If you know there is no god, and don't believe in him, you are a Gnostic atheist.
Daniel800 2 months ago
@Daniel800 I am an Agnostic Atheist.
I don't know he exists, and I don't believe in him.
Daniel800 2 months ago
@Daniel800 So?
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
@mrtadreamer So, I'm not just an agnostic.
Agnostic by itself doesn't mean anything. Its like saying powerfully. Its basically an adjective.
So, I am an agnostic atheist.
Daniel800 2 months ago
@Daniel800 Fine.
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
@mrtadreamer You forgot a word. That would him/her an agnostic...atheist. Remember that you are an atheist as long as you do not believe a deity exists. Recognizing that it is possible for a god to exists, doesn't affect one's atheist status. After all, it is possible that magical pink, invisible unicorns exist, but that doesn't mean people actually believe they do
1Lanavis1 2 months ago 4
@1Lanavis1 I have no interest in the paganistic mindset of the Romans of the first century, nor of more of the same sort of thing in this one.
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
@mrtadreamer WTF are you talking about? You in no way replied to what I'm saying. I'm not talking about pagan Romans. I'm talking about the Gospels.
1Lanavis1 2 months ago
@1Lanavis1 Do your home work. In the first century, the Romans called the early Christians atheists because they didn't believe in the many pagan Roman gods. With the recent resurgence of such paganist notions by the so-called new atheists, the attempt is being made again to label Christians 'atheists". As for the Gospel, nowhere in the Bible are Chrisiens called "atheists." In the Book of Acts, it recounts that we were first called Christians at Antioch Acts 11:26.
mrtadreamer 2 months ago
@mrtadreamer Read what I am writing. You are not answering my comments correctly at all! I never said Christians were atheists or said that I agree with the Romans or even mention the Romans at all before you did. WTF is your problem. I'm talking about the differences in the Gospels, not what Christians were called back then! Use your eyes to read not to judge.
1Lanavis1 2 months ago
Fairy Tales... sure this retard realizes that these "fairy tales" have been written about on Cave walls or in old books. Surely this retard realizes that Christians don't belive that "magic" created cars or any of the other materialistic things he brought up. Surely this retard realizes that without an omnipotent being to set guidelines and morals, then there would be way to distinguish between what is good or evil. This is just a guy who gets a high on screaming and hearing his own voice.
timiscool1984 2 months ago
@timiscool1984 You need to be told what is the difference between good and evil? weird..l don't. If that's the case please keep believing in fairy tales.
Da40kOrks 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Da40kOrks Um... have you had any education outside of grade school? Have you once taken ANY form of philosophy class where they teach you about the different teachings of scholars and philosophists... much of whom weren't Christians? Whether you choose to do what's right based off of what "feels" good to you or based off of what is best for a "group" of people is called choosing between types of philosophies. However, one thing remains the same between each...
timiscool1984 2 months ago
Comment removed
timiscool1984 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Da40kOrks Each philosophy... and there are a lot of them... are based on the societies that you live in. There are many cultures in the world (mostly middle eastern) that believe FGM is completely acceptable. Hopefully, anyone that is reading this would see that it is a complete violation of someone's rights and down right inhumane. The difference is... in OUR society, FGM is not ok. FGM would be considered a violation of rights and is therefore illegal... continued...
timiscool1984 2 months ago
@Da40kOrks In the contries that carry out the FGM practices, it is morally accepted by society. Keep in mind that the main reason FGM is carried out is because it is said to bring more sexual satisfaction to men while copulating. So, here we are... two different societies with 2 different opinions of what is right or wrong. At what point did these societies decide that it was "ok" to do something like this? Continued...
timiscool1984 2 months ago
@Da40kOrks Who was the person that decided that it was not Ok to do this and where did they get their beliefs from? Surely someone has an answer for that. So, to answer your question... do I need someone to tell me the difference between right and wrong? Absolutely! If a distinction was never created between what was right or wrong then anyone locked up in jail should be set free, FGM should be carried out worldwide, and punishment should not be a word.
timiscool1984 2 months ago
@Da40kOrks I personally believe that Jesus Christ (Who has been accepted as a philosopher) was sent to this earth to spread a new set of teachings. What is so wrong with the Bible and the teachings it renders. As the Son of God, Christ was the megaphone for God's voice. Christ spread the word and distinguished between what was right or wrong. Some people chose to follow him, and some didn't. Hence... many different philosophies/beliefs.
timiscool1984 2 months ago
@timiscool1984 Authority is not, nor can it ever be, morality. It is tyranny. Which is what the god of the bible is, a tyrant. His morality boils down to "do what I say not what I do..or else." This is NOT morality in any way, shape or form. Because you will always come up against they Euthyphro dilemma.
Apologists will play endless word games and literally make shit up, basically to whatever they can to get around it..and fail every time.
Da40kOrks 2 months ago
@Da40kOrks You are complety. Wrong... it's not and never has been a... do what I say or else. There has ALWAYS been a choice... whether you choose to take it is completly up to you. Also, if we were to go by that logic... then any laws known to man would be considered tyranny. How is different if God punished because of misbehavior, than being sent to jail because of failure to obey laws? Also, since when did I ever say anything about authority? 10 Commandments = Laws
timiscool1984 2 months ago
@timiscool1984 Ya great response. Follow the tyrant or go to hell, great choices. Infinite punishment for finite crimes. And which of the hundreds of different GODS laws are right, Jews, Christian, Sharia? I hope you have made the right choice there Mr.Cool, or you get the same treatment;-). The best choice is ALWAYS to just live your life and do all you can to do more good than harm to the world around you. Anyone, GOD or not that demands worship does not deserve it.
BigDwarren 2 months ago 9
@BigDwarren And again, we are back to the concept of... who determines what is right and wrong?>>> I question which you evaded a few posts ago. That is funny thing about arguing/debating the origin of morality with agnostics/atheists. They always find a way to divert the attention away from stuff they can't answer with "scientific proof". It's almost a waste of my time to debate with people like that... yet I can't get away from it... not sure why.
timiscool1984 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@timiscool1984I will say this. I do recognize you are searching for answers. But, your way of goin about it is off. I know you can not see it I use to not be able to see the other side myself. Evolution is not out to destroy God. It is out to destroy ignorance. If knowledge is what you aspire I can help the same as you can help me with things I don't understand. I apologize for being terse and blount with you, but it does upset me to see these kind of arguments that are baseless and inaccurate.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 Also FYI I am a biologist in the medical field and I do see evolution in germs and bacteria every day. Also I have visited museums to see the fossil record for myself, you can too. So again your logic is flawed. It took many years of study and hard work to get where I am and it makes me out of my mind to see someone skew the facts and bring up all these tired, disproven talking points from creationists.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@BigDwarren Disproven talking points... yeah, much like your whole view on morality and where it originated...
timiscool1984 1 month ago
@BigDwarren Also, by calling my God (or any God) "A Tyrant" leads me to believe that you do in fact believe there is a God. If this is not the case, then you are a true nut-case calling something/someone names when/if they don't exist. That would be like my 4 year old daughter talking to her friend Jenny right next to her even though there is no one obviously there.
timiscool1984 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 And I may be wrong if I am plz anyone correct me but you called me the nut-case first lol. SOOOO you were saying and I quote "If this is not the case, then you are a true nut-case calling something/someone names when/if they don't exist" and "People like you are a disgrace to the world of debates and intellegent arguments". Can you not see the flawed logic in all your statements from start to finish? Come on guy you have to grow out of this.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
@BigDwarren Excuse me? I was quoting our dear friend up in the video above that started this whole debate... Haha. It was you who went on the offensive. Not to mention, you have still failed to explain to me how evolution works? You>>>Yourself>>> have NOT seen the evolution of humanity with your own eyes. Congratulations though, what you have seen is the rapid change of germs/bacteria. This rapid change is so far off from evolution that I don't see how you can compare the two.
timiscool1984 1 month ago
As for fossil records... someone somewhere decided the "time frame" for what fossils would be based off. How do we know that this time frame is accurate? No one was around billions of years ago... like Scientists seem to think. The Bible tells stories that back no more than 6000 years ago. Guess what... the earliest forms of recorded history started about 6000 years ago. Coincedence? No! You know why? Because there was no history to record before that point... there was no history!
timiscool1984 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 UNFORTUNATELY there is no excuse for you anymore and I did explain evolution to you. You just can not see the forest for the trees. Francis Collins will tell you all you need to know look it up, (thats sarcasm , I know you have seen his videos you just want to be a troll). Sorry to everyone for feeding him but I can not stand stupidity.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
If you haven't seen the evolution of humanity, then you ARE forced to put faith in the infallible humans (or "scientists" before you) that the world deemed "intellegent." This is the same corrupt world that used God's Will during the crusades. The same world that allowed someone like Hitler reign. The same world that allowed Obama to become president... Clearly, our world makes mistakes. We are, after all, human.
timiscool1984 1 month ago
Kudos to you and your degree, but have you ever run across an All-knowing proffessor who has all kinds of degrees/recognitions who you disagreed with? I have... Not everyone is perfect. Yet, you still must choose to believe in these humans/scientists/evolutionists and with that... their margin of error. No thanks... I will NEVER put my faith in another human!
timiscool1984 1 month ago
@timiscool1984 No and you have never ran across an all-knowing pasture either dipshit and you may have been lead down the wrong path which is the entire point. Your bible was writen by men you retard so yes you do trust in just what MEN have writen in that book LMAO. You are so blind.
BigDwarren 1 month ago
Fucking awesome!
88rat88 2 months ago
Faith in god is like believing you can run through brick walls. so Christians, put your faith to test . try and run through brick walls head 1st =D maybe you'll wake up then?! i hope so. lol
TyeDye07 3 months ago in playlist More videos from CultOfDusty
@TyeDye07 No it's not. I believe in God and I stubbed my toe on a wall once. Believing in God doesn't give you super-powers, it gives you eternal life.
dude33ism 2 months ago
@dude33ism your not understanding. you totally missed the FULL point of what im trying to say. so let me break it down for you sir/mam lol you know you can't actually run through a wall but when you put your faith to test you believe you can... just like god. you know he doesn't exist . so you use the whole faith thing as an excuse to believe. FAITH is your TOOL(excuse) for everything.
TyeDye07 2 months ago
@TyeDye07 Know I know God exists hence the point of my faith. And I don't believe I can run threw a wall. I have put my faith to the test by trying to tell you about mine. Your faith in an explosion out of nothing is like walking into the middle of a busty highway and saying "I won't get hit because I don't believe in trucks!"
dude33ism 2 months ago
@dude33ism Lol wow dood your logic is all bent. science is reason and evidence. not just people making stuff up and believing what you CANT see smell touch or hear lol you cant make me believe im Atheist you should convert. i believe the SUN is the real god. please dont call me crazy. please dont! becus i could call you and every other christian crazy for soooo many reason... but yeah bigbang theory is the reason were here on this earth,,,,
TyeDye07 2 months ago
@TyeDye07 I could also call you crazy too. Explosion coming out of nothing and coincidence and random chance leading to a perfect earth with perfect sustainable conditions to sustain life with no reason. But since I don't need an argument I'm going to settle our differences and move on with life believing in a reason for being while you don't have to if you don't want.
dude33ism 2 months ago
@dude33ism you act like it All happened in 7 days... man this it toook billions of years,. big bang is not from nothin its a collide of 2 things and what came about is planets. who created all the other planets theres soooo many planets did your god create them all and decided to put people on earth cmon man you sound crazy lol but dood just continue believing in your god and i will continue to be free thinking rationally with Logic and reason. while you rely on your faith and a book lol peace!
TyeDye07 2 months ago
@dude33ism oh and before time did you know earth was all land until the continental divide. did your god do that too ? lol
TyeDye07 2 months ago
@TyeDye07 Yes he did I do believe in pangea. God gathered the land in one place in Genesis. The when the flood happened the springs of the deep burst forth spewing water and breaking the continents separating them which is why they look like puzzle pieces. I believe earthquakes are caused not only by tectonics but also by the continents continuing to settle in their new locations. And what where those 2 things that collided causing the big bang? Where did you say they came from?
dude33ism 2 months ago
Comment removed
AtheistPowerlifter 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dude33ism "Explosion coming out of nothing and coincidence and random chance leading to a perfect earth with perfect sustainable conditions to sustain life with no reason."
Most of our planet is uninhabitable. The vast vast majority of species that evolved on our planet have gone extinct. This is not a perfect earth..we live on a climatic knife edge.
The 'big bang' wasn't an 'explosion'.
If there was a designer, they are incompetent and callous.
AtheistPowerlifter 2 months ago
@AtheistPowerlifter Most of our planet is uninhabitable? Even though we are in severe overpopulation? And all the species that have micro-evolved on our planet have gone extinct due to something as natural as death. This earth is not a perfect world I see that...but it is the only planet with perfect enough conditions to support life. I don't see how random chance can cause this. I just don't. I just find it scientifically impossible for a Big Bang or anything to come from nothing.
dude33ism 2 months ago
@dude33ism Yes humans have overpopulated...this is a huge problem BECAUSE 90% of the earths surface cannot be inhabited by humans...oceans, deserts, etc.
Whether you want to accept the randomness of the universe matters not...it is what it is. There is no purpose...no 'why'. Our human brains try to seek patterns and purpose- but there is none beyond what we make/invent.
For me this does not detract from the wonder and beauty of life. We live, we die, that's it. Enjoy it.
AtheistPowerlifter 2 months ago
@AtheistPowerlifter Well said on your last comment.
heryop 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Comment removed
heryop 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@heryop Well I do believe that scientists have found fossilized woolly mammoths with food still in there mouths. So i'm guessing the "ice age" happened a lot quicker than we think. I believe that when the flood happened, water and debris swept across the globe fossilizing and even freezing animals as fast as instantaneously. I have a comeback for everything. The Bible cant contradict itself, not once. Do some more research before spouting your mouth off about something you don't even know about.
dude33ism 2 months ago
@dude33ism "scientists have found fossilized woolly mammoths with food still in there mouths...the "ice age" happened a lot quicker than we think"
Or the mammoth fell over dead while it was eating.
"The Bible cant contradict itself, not once."
Read the 4 gospel accounts of the resurrection and ask:
- what time was he crucified?
- what did jesus say as he 'died'?
- who/how many came to his tomb the 3rd day?
- were there angels there? Or men?
Some examples of many contradictions.
AtheistPowerlifter 2 months ago
@AtheistPowerlifter Really? The 4 Gospels all have the same story. He was crucified from the 6th hour to the 9th hour.
He died while saying "Father into your hands I give you my Spirit.
Each Gospel agree's that Mary went to the tomb though none of them state which Mary it is. And then Matthew and Luke name more visitors. But they all agree that Mary was there but the other Gospels just name the other people that went as well.
And they were angels because the 4 Gospels all say there were.
dude33ism 2 months ago
@dude33ism They have the same story, but with different details like with the number of angels for one. Any contradiction despite how small it is, IS STILL A F-ING CONTRADICTION!
1Lanavis1 2 months ago
Everything coming from nothing and life coming from a blob of non-living crap. That's totally logical.
dude33ism 3 months ago
@dude33ism
Your logic is exactly the same, except replacing non living crap, it's an imaginary living crap.
PwnU31 2 months ago
@PwnU31 If you really believe that than whose right?
dude33ism 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dude33ism "Everything coming from nothing & life from a blob of non-living crap...totally logical."
Though what you said is a mischaracterization (look up Lawrence krauss and this abiogenesis vid: watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg)..what you said is more logical than: a magic man (our image) who is eternal made everything (even though he is more complicated than everything) out of nothing by poofing it into existence to subsequently destroy it via flood and then sacrifice himself...and on...
AtheistPowerlifter 2 months ago
1:35 that word... Uh... it has some meanings other than describing really big things you know.
Gameguy602 3 months ago
i believe our existance is circumstantial. we are subject to the environment that preceeded us. and if you otherwise didn't exist you certainly wouldnt be questioning it. namely, its in our nature to question, but truth is impartial to what may be more appealing for most.
georgio210 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a woman with lust you have committed adultery with her in your heart. have u done that?
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Heaven or Hell? Does this concern you?
Do u need a Savior from your sins?
Jesus (The Son of God)came, lived a sinless life, died on the cross (for our sins) and rose again on the third day.
needgod.com
if you are interested in abortion or thinking of having one watch 180 movie
standingontruth1 3 months ago in playlist Reason and Science
it sure does not matter what you believe in,As long as Jesus Christ believe in you
torqstranger1 4 months ago
@torqstranger1 Your fucking trolling, go kill yourself.
drumlord159 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I believe in many things, but I have faith in nothing
zachariasadams1984 4 months ago
You don't believe in nothing. You believe there is no god. you cant prove he does not exist yet you believe he isn't there. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. The multiverse? really? please throw more hypotheticals into your argument. You throw the word science at everything when, by definition, it cant prove god doesn't exist. Nothing you spout is close to "logic". the scientific minded, who are honest and looking for answers, choose agnosticism. Not your faith based hate preach.
SocialDiseaseTV 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV Atheists dont believe there is no god because atheism is a rejection of a statement that there is one, not a religious position. Atheism doesnt even state that there is no god, the statement is that we think that the possibility of there is a god is lower than 50%(and thats what agnosticism is all about - agnostics dont have a position or religion, while atheists have). And the statement that the possibility is lower than 50% is actually based on science.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV and the scientific facts, such as the age of the universe and Earth(no 6000 y.o. world), the evolution(no Adam and Eve), the form of the Earth(it's stated in the bible that Earth is flat), also on the fact that stories told in the bible, like Noa's ark and tower of Babyl, do not actually correspond to reality, and more of that - we have the history of how the christianity was created, like how "Christ's blood and flesh" was taken from pagan's religions
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV and on top of that - yes, no evidence for god' existence. At. All.
If you say that just the absence of evidence itself is good enough to believe in something, then why God? Why not spagetti monster, Santa or pink unicorn - they have the exact same level of trustworthiness as bible's God has.
Because the critical thinking does not work in a way of exepting something as a truth only because it isnt proven that it doesnt exist.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV And in the way that agnostics tend to think, the possibility of each god to exist is equal. Allah, Zeus and others - they have the same chance as bible's god has. And there cant be all the gods at once because they contradict each others. So if all the gods have the chance to exist, the chance of there be one certain god is far less then 50%.
This is far from all what I can present you with, I can just say that it's well written in "God's delusion" if you mind readnig it.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV And if you say that the scientific minded, who are honest and looking for answers, choose agnosticism, then why so many leading scientists are atheists? Just saying.
And seriously, Thor or Odin have better concept than God. So even if you go as far as believing in something that wasn't proven and which possibility of existence is lower than 50%, then why not pick some cool guy rather than God which demands you to kill those who work on sunday.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV yeah and sorry for my bad english, it's not my first nor second language.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@DemimondXXIII bad argument. I didn't bring up god, the bible doesn't say the earth is flat.You, like so many atheists are trying your hardest to get around the definition. you say the critical thinkers don't accept things that aren't proven, then cite evolution. Leading scientists only claim to be atheist after changing the definition. Dawkins says in the god delusion he's 6th level agnostic (7th is atheism) by a scale he invented. Your percentages are made up and Dawkins is a poor philosopher.
SocialDiseaseTV 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV
1. It says that Earth if a disc. Not a sphere.
2. Evolution theory is a fact. Look it up.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@DemimondXXIII speaking of misinterpretations you mean Isaiah 22:18 hebrew, "dwur". Definition 1: ball, circle. Oxford English Dictionary : Atheism Disbelief in, or denial of, the existence of a god. Why are you still calling it evolution THEORY if it's "100%" proven? index fossils? Cambrian explosion? Alot of people have converted both ways, your lack of "knowing any" isn't a valid or compelling argument. There are scientists that look at the evidence and come to very different conclusions.
SocialDiseaseTV 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV If you use Oxford English Dictionary, then search up what scientific theory is. Protip: it' something that's been proven to work. Gravity is also still called a theory, you know. And what about Cambrian explosion? Wasnt it already explained as a part of evolutionarey process when living organisms adapted tp oxygen which alloed more lifeforms to exist? And even more so, look what is the time period of cembrian explosion.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV And I dont say that critical thinkers don't accept things that aren't proven, I said(quote): "critical thinking does not work in a way of exepting something as a truth only because it isnt proven that it doesnt exist". In other words, no evidence AT ALL=no trustworthliness. even when evolution wasnt 100% proven it had a pile of evidence supporting it.
Sorry to put it out but you tried to misinterpretate me.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV and if scientists exept atheism only after changing the definition, then what is your definition of atheism and why do you think you know better than atheists what it actually is? I mean, almost all the atheists were religious one time in their life, but I cant name 1 single religious person who was an atheist before exepting some sort of religion. And what about scientists changing definitions, in examples, please?
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV and I just remembered from my inuversity course on science studying and how critical thinking works:
1. Critical\rational thinking: doing a research => getting some information => build a theory based on that information
2. Not critical\irrational thinking: make a statement => look for the evidence to support it(dont care if it wont be found)
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@DemimondXXIII here
/watch?v=wyT_AOtwHa4
/watch?v=XcuSMQVq5dM
SocialDiseaseTV 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV You bought into creationist interpretation? Dawkins clearly states that Eartj lifeforms can be brought outside the planet by aliens, but that doesnt deny the need to explain where those aliens came from. Sorry but you hear only what you want to hear.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@DemimondXXIII you referred to the bible being based off of pagan religions? does this mean you bought into zeitgeist? this sounds like you're angry and on a soapbox.you said most atheists were religious before? (id say they're religious now) but what did you go through? you've accepted what you want to hear and did no fact checking. you aren't interested in the science you claim to cling too. most critical thinking atheists wouldn't back some of the claims you've made here. Did Jesus exist?
SocialDiseaseTV 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV I dont even know what zitgeist is. For example, Christ demanding to eat his flesh and drink his blood is taken from the pagan religions, etc.
You say that atheists are religious? Prove how.
I gone trough education before I became atheist, and you are just thworing shit on me with unproven statements about how Im interested in science, sir. And what about fact cheking, for example?
And what "claims" of which I made here, "most critical thinking atheists wouldn't back"?
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV Isaiah 22:18 hebrew: He will surely wind you around and around, and throw you like a ball into a large country. There you will die, and there the chariots of your glory will be, you shame of your lord's house.
Where is the mention of sphere or circle? I meant Isaiah 40:22 "It is he that sitteth upon the circle
of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in."
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
@SocialDiseaseTV and the original of word for circle there is chuwg, which is translated as flat circle, like a coin. No sphere mentioned. Look, I underestand that ancient lexicon might be lucking the ways to explain stuff, but if bible was meant to say that earth is a sphere, why then people thought that Earth is flat untill Magellan proven it's a fricking sphere and why was it translated as a circle?
And pardon me but you sound angry and mad with all that unverified assumptions you make.
DemimondXXIII 4 months ago
DO YOU BELIEVE IN Native American Spirituality ????
ADamonedSoul 4 months ago
my chair isn't comfortable
loganpekrul 4 months ago
Man Dusty you should do vids with thunderfoot
NANOFORGE 4 months ago
Comment removed
fatcat2939 5 months ago
Fucking reality....... go dude.
fatcat2939 5 months ago 7
It's really, really fucking bizarre to see and hear someone with such a pronounced Southern accent being so logical, factual and scientific. Like, fuck! Kudos to you, sir.
Darksunshinerain87 5 months ago 34
@Darksunshinerain87 listen here nigger if anyones gonna be fucking my sister its gonna be me
dixienormasXXL 4 months ago
@dixienormasXXL Disturbing...
MarcusEFN 4 months ago
Holy shit.... :o
Yes sir what ever you say sir!!!!! Just don't be angry T_T
Nah just kidding. Wonderfully put. Exactly what I feel every single time but keep my self restrained not to cause unnecessary scene on supper. ;)
Mtaalas 5 months ago
Yes he is right u r wrong
toolarmysniper 5 months ago
you are amazing! :D i love your videos! you should give all your speeches about christians in churches then maybe they'll open there fucking eyes...or they might just say get the fuck outta gods house lol
JunoKillYou 5 months ago
I'm with Keats. Truth is beauty.
PrintedTruth 6 months ago
U are a genius!
nazmibest 6 months ago
"Don't believe in anything."
My responce; "Chrisitans only believe in Fiction. " Stop defining your god as everyone's everything.
QuestionRenee 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD, HEAVEN, AND SEX: Internet article examines the Biblical possibility of sex in heaven. Human sexuality isn't just for reproduction. There are reasons the Bible requires marriage for sex on earth, but those reasons won't exist in heaven. Scripture teaches, in heaven, we'll be like the angels only in one sense - no marriage, but we won't be like angels in every other way (i.e. Bible says we'll enjoy food and drink). Psalm 16:11 says there will be great spiritual joy and pleasures in heaven.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy. Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 6 months ago
@Mogley52
Anyone who uses "kinds" as a biology term doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to entropy. Stay out of science, you clearly aren't qualified to talk about it. No scientist points to the supernatural origin of the universe, at least not in their peer reviewed research. You're literally talking out of your ass.
Russlem 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living, reproducing if their reproductive system, vital structures, and organs hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT ABOUT THE STARS? Gravity explains how the order found in the precise courses of trillions of stars is maintained, but gravity can't explain the origin of that order! Did all the trillions stars agree to get out of each others way? C'mon! Disorder in the universe is because of chance, but the order is because of design. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE DOESN'T EXPLAIN AWAY GOD: Natural laws may explain how an airplane or living cell works, but mere undirected natural laws cannot explain the origin of either. Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 6 months ago
@Mogley52
Thats because there are no scientists at the institute for creation.
There are scientists who believe in god, but not a one that buys into creationism or intelligent design.
chaoszieg 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument for a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as flawed or useless.
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BLIND WATCHMAKER NO ARGUMENT. Natural selection is no "blind watchmaker" because it can only "select" from variations produced having survival value. It doesn't produce variations. It only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't be involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it living! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
AMINO ACIDS CAN HAPPEN BY CHANCE BUT NOT PROTEINS: Read my popular Internet articles, "How Forensic Science Refutes Atheism," "Origin of Life Deception by Evolutionists," "Any Life On Mars Came From Earth."
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
INTELLIGENT DESIGN DEBATE: If you discovered a sand castle on a lonely beach, you can't prove it was made by either chance or design. No one observed its origins. Either it was designed or the random forces of wind and waves made the castle. You didn't find fingerprints. Did the wind wipe the fingerprints away? How do we know that there were fingerprints in the first place? By chance or by design? Both sides should present their case. Read the article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION DOESN'T HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of transitional forms and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discusses mixed species in fossils (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum conveniently ignored by evolutionists).
Mogley52 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 6 months ago