He was vet checked. He was not in pain. He just could not move his leg properly due to an old injury healed over with scar tissue making it so he could not flex his leg properly. If you knew him you could tell that horse was not in pain. I would not ride him if he was in pain.
What is so cruel about it. Cody was not in pain or anything. He was vet checked and fine to ride. The vet said he just could not flex his leg properly due to scar tissue healed over his hamstring due to an old injury but it did not cause him pain. That horse loved to move sometimes without me telling him too :P. And he would not of run or anything on his own if he did not want to. If he was in pain or anything I would not of ridden him. I went by the vet and what he said.
you are so cruel :( :( poor horse
beaybeto 1 year ago
He was vet checked. He was not in pain. He just could not move his leg properly due to an old injury healed over with scar tissue making it so he could not flex his leg properly. If you knew him you could tell that horse was not in pain. I would not ride him if he was in pain.
hermonine 2 years ago
cruel this is just cruel
LAURENLOVEify 2 years ago
What is so cruel about it. Cody was not in pain or anything. He was vet checked and fine to ride. The vet said he just could not flex his leg properly due to scar tissue healed over his hamstring due to an old injury but it did not cause him pain. That horse loved to move sometimes without me telling him too :P. And he would not of run or anything on his own if he did not want to. If he was in pain or anything I would not of ridden him. I went by the vet and what he said.
hermonine 2 years ago