Added: 2 years ago
From: sonotover
Views: 34,020
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (284)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I wish I could use Adobe products for animation. At least their not overpriced.

  • with what program did you made that? i'm beginning with blender because i also want to such things!

  • for some reason I love this video!

  • Put the magazine in reaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaly slowly why don't you.

  • maaaaaaan, you don't hold your finger on the trigger when reloading.

  • @CombatCow thanks for your feedback

  • call of duty career in near future

  • You cannot reload with the finger still on the trigger with m4 variants

  • what game?

  • rainbow six vegas 2?

  • WHat program is this?

  • Wow really who are those 9 retards that disliked this video that was amazing!

  • xD

  • dust cover open, finger off the trigger whilst reloading and you're good!

  • @MarksmanLeBlanc You missed that he didn't press the mag release.

  • @robs104 you dont need to all the time

  • @kristinatina18 If you want to take the magazine out you do.

  • @robs104 when its totally out

  • @kristinatina18 I think you're thinking of the bolt release, I'm talking about the button that causes the magazine to drop out.

  • @robs104 yea, oops

  • great job :)

  • it looks like he placed the same mag it already had.

  • SMOOTH  real nice!

  • Nice dust cover there. >_>

  • Looks good but you can make it more faster and make it more human like put a little mistake when the hand put the maganize in so it would be more real because if you are shooting you will have stress so will be harder put in the maganize just a little error so it would look real but out of that details !!!looks awesomeee!!!

  • Very robotic and slow.

  • What program did you use?

  • Man, everytime I look at a picture of a qbz-95 (type 95)

    I just absolutely have to shoot it.

    Its like when you are dying of thirst and you see a kool aid commercial.

    God bless those chinese guns.....but German guns are far supior (woot H&K!)

  • oh, and also, I just watched 3 videos of people shooting AR platformed weapons, charging handles were used quite alot, sorry to bring that up again.

  • Hmm, So did the AR-15 come before the M4? Nope.

    Does 5.56x39 Exist? Nope.

    Is the forward assist used to clear a jam? Nope.

    "HURR DURR I know what RT-20 and some other random, trivial information, so I know more than you. I'm going to tell you to play with your toy guns because I have nothing better to say."

  • @csmybuttt Oops. Meant to say:

    AR-15 come after the M4? Nope.

  • @csmybuttt

    I just posted a link to you of a 5.56x39 magazine on an official gun sellers website, lol.

    I know more than you, for sure. As I said, all you know is things about the AR platform, you dont know history, names, or ammunition types and ordnance.

    Look how butthurt you are, like...4 comments?

    Do you really expect me to read all that?

    Look, you have been wiking facts, and dont so you haven't because you are lying and its very obvious.

    And the forward assist does clear jams.

  • @MrThembones Again, I know more practical and useful information. How useful is knowing that RT-20 fires a 20mm round, as opposed to knowing the difference between 5.56 and .223? Honestly, I'm a fan of the Russian weapons. When SHTF, I'm going for the AK47. Again, it's not like you don't comment spam; I've done it only because you do it. So every time I'm right, I'm copying wikipedia? Is it so hard that someone else knows something you don't?

  • @csmybuttt I didn't say you are copying wikipedia, you are using it as a source. You dont know the actual information. I mean, the fact that I can take a quote from you and compare it to one from wikipedia is quite pathetic and shows you clearly used it.

    I dont comment spam, or atleast not as hard as your butthurt faggish self.

    The fact is, you are being arrogant and claimed you know more than me, when clearly you dont.

    I know the basics, history, names, sizes. You know only about AR's.

  • @MrThembones You've been saying that I've been quoting wikipedia, no? What's wrong with using it as a fact-checker? Why don't you use it, so you don't make an ass of yourself? I don't know how to say this any clearer, but just because I merely stated a fact that is well-known doesn't mean that I copied off wikipedia. Again, get this through your fucking THICK skull: I was quoting AR as an example of what I know, not that it is the only thing I know. LEARN TO FUCKING UNDERSTAND SENTENCES.

  • @csmybuttt It means you didnt know the information until you looked it up on wikipedia. Thanks for admitting you use it.

    I do understand sentences. LEARN TO FUCKING UNDERSTAND FIREARMS.

    lol.

  • @MrThembones Again, I know the things I discuss. As for the things that I don't know off the top of my head, I do a quick 10-second search to confirm what I already knew. If you really did understand what I've said, then why do you keep repeating insults that I've already claimed otherwise?

  • @csmybuttt I understand what you have said, alot of it. And you still claim you know more.

    And much of it is structured the EXACT way wikipedia structures it, meaning you use it as a source, and you admitted you have been using it as a "checker" which typically means you would have been wrong if you hadn't checked.

    Go ahead, ask me questions.

  • @MrThembones Again, I only use it to make sure I don't write incorrect information. Honestly, I'd rather be informed and state correct information rather than pull information out of my ass and make a fool of myself.

  • @csmybuttt you know more about AR's than I do, sure enough.

    But not about firearms in general. Firearm history, firearm sizes, ammo sizes, names, classifications, etc etc.

    I doubt you know what a pepper box is, wheel lock, why revolver rifles were bad and dangerous to use, ordnance, technology, etc etc.

  • @MrThembones I actually do know what you're doubting that I do.

    Peppberbox-gun with multiple barrels.

    Wheel lock- a wheel mechanism is wound and used to ignite a powder charge against a flint

    revolver rifles-hot barrel increased the risk of all chambers going off at once

    Again, you are just a narrow minded teenager who is unable to acknowledge that someone else is more knowledgeable. Contrary to what mommy and daddy told you, you aren't special.

  • @csmybuttt You aren't more knowledgable, you are arrogant.

    You stalked me on my channel until I slipped up just so you can attempt to make yourself look better.

    You even said so.

    Congrats, you got those questions right. Lol, ask me some, why dont ya?

  • @MrThembones Maybe I am arrogant, but you are an incorrigible deluded prick. I didn't stalk you; you made an ass of yourself on your own.

  • @csmybuttt *yawns

    then how'd ya find me?

  • @MrThembones Through this video. I saw a retarded comment, and I decided to comment on it. Short story, really.

  • @MrThembones So what is the difference between the AK47 and the Type 56? I've asked, yet you have yet to respond.

  • @csmybuttt I didn't even see you ask that.

    Agh the type series, I love those things. The Qbz-95 is gorgeous.

    type 56, for starters, is chinese. I remember looking up all the AK guns to make pivot replicas of (which was a project I gave up on) but type 56 was the first I came across.

    Im not sure the specific date, but the type was made in the 1950's for sure, and the AK-47 is well...1947 clearly.

    Type 56's front sites are closed, and no threaded muzzle. I think thats about it.

  • @MrThembones ...and integral underfolding bayonet.

  • @csmybuttt agh, thats right!

    AK-47 needs an attached bayonet. Hmm.

    Come on ask another, this is fun.

  • @MrThembones What are differences between M16A1 and A2?

  • @csmybuttt forward assist.

    I remember this one because I watched a program about vietnam.'

    US infantry were mad because the M16 litterally ripped the shell inhalf within the chamber and it would jam the gun badly.

  • @MrThembones Actually, the A1 and A2 models both had forward assists. I think that was the difference between m16 and the a1 model. Without the forward assist, the cartridge could not be fully seated, so it would blow up. The differences between A1 and A2 are a symmetric handguard (no more different left and right pieces), rear sight, barrel twist rate, and the burst option in place of full auto. That's all I can think of off the top of my head.

  • @csmybuttt darn, got A1 and M16 mixed up.

    hmmm.......

    whats the difference between the FN FAL and the FN CAL

  • @MrThembones FAL=7.62nato

    CAL=5.56

    How do you engage the safety on a mosin nagant?

  • @csmybuttt

    I dunno, never shot or even held a mosin nagant.

  • @MrThembones Regarding bullpup weapons, there is the inherent problems with ejection. What are some workarounds that exist?

  • @csmybuttt I dont see what you mean by this.

    What is the issue? They cant be shot left handed, muzzle is too close to shooter, etc.

  • @MrThembones Exactly. As with the SA80 series, you can only shoot right handed, unless you have some shells-in-your-face fetish. However, other popular bullpup weapons have circumvented this issue, so left handed shooting is far more practical.

  • @csmybuttt oh, I thought you meant something entirely different like jams or broken parts and how to fix them.

    No, shells in your face isn't fun, it will both sting and burn.

  • @MrThembones Well, there are other bullpup weapons that can be fired left handed comfortably. Do you know some of the weapons and how they deal with ambidexterity?

  • @csmybuttt I read that the AUG was one of the left-hand friendly weapons.

  • @MrThembones Yes, as the ejection can be modified to either side. I'd say Fabrique Nationale is more innovative, as its P90 PDW has a top loading magazine and ejects straight down, making the weapon completely ambidextrous. Its F2000 utilizes a forward ejection system in which spent casings are ejected in front of the user.

  • @csmybuttt I was going to say both P90 and the F2000.

    The F2000 ejects the shells just above the barrel in the front, and P90 ejects in the back from below the gun.

    So great, now I get bullets in my shoes.

  • @csmybuttt soooooo......

  • @csmybuttt

    The FAMAS can be switched.

  • guess he cant handle two people just proved him wrong at the same time.

  • @MrThembones Who's the other person?

  • @MrThembones Again, I know the same fact as wikipedia does. There aren't too many ways to say the same expression. In any case, your wikipedia quote does not mention interchangeability, nor do I mention what each round is used for. Your point is moot.

    Round identification fail. Stop trying to go above and beyond, and getting it wrong (again, not surprising) the round is a 5.45x39, not 5.56. Does that matter? Absolutely, as interchangeability is impossible.

  • lets see what you are wrong on here

    the question about .22

    atom bomb

    charging handle

    come on, ask me some questions.

  • @MrThembones Sorry, the only thing I'm "wrong" about is the atomic bomb. Even then, it's "wrong" because I gave a correct answer, but it's not the one in your narrow mind. Charging handle? Look up any random AR-15 video. You'll never see the operator use the charging handle after the first magazine, unless it's to clear a jam.

    What is the difference between 5.56x45mm and .223?

  • @csmybuttt My narrow mind? no, retard, it didn't even relate to the question. You did not answer correct.

    You are COMPLETELY wrong about the AR's charging handle. And I know you never even shot one before.

    And yeah, I looked up a random AR, M16 and yeah, the charging handle was pulled everytime a clip is emptied.

    5.56mm is the same thing .223.

    I know the difference between callibre and milimeter.

  • @MrThembones I have used an AR-15 and I know how it functions. So then, why does the bolt catch exist? Tell me, is it for decoration?

    Sorry, 5.56mm has a higher pressure, thicker casing, and longer bullet. A rifle chambered in 5.56 can shoot .223, but the inverse is not recommended.

    I wasn't asking you to convert units, retard.

  • @csmybuttt the bolt catch is there when the previous clip wasn't used entirely for much quicker reload.

    A standard 5.56mm round is .223.

    You might be thinking of different measurments of a 5.56.

  • @MrThembones Actually, scratch that. You seem to be far more informed than I thought. If the previous MAGAZINE(not clip, moron) wasn't emptied, then there is a round in the chamber. All you have to do is insert a mag and shoot; no additional steps. The bolt catch is for an empty reload, with the bolt in the rearward position from the previous magazine.

    Yes, the 5.56 and 223 are identical in exterior dimension, but are otherwise different and not entirely interchangeable. There is no other 5.56

  • @MrThembones "the bolt catch is there when the previous clip wasn't used entirely for much quicker reload." I just copied and pasted your words; so where did you say magazine again?

    So I'm right about the 5.56 and 223, and there you go again about wikipedia. Sorry, kid; that was off the top of my head. Is it that difficult for you to admit that someone else is correct? Why don't you come back when you're done with puberty?

  • @csmybuttt Sorry, but the sentence was copied from wikipedia, and I even posted a comment comparing a quote from wikipedia to yours.

    Lol, Im done with puberty, how bout you airsoft, boy?

  • @MrThembones Tell me, why do you keep mentioning airsoft? Have I mentioned it as a source? Nope. So why do you keep bringing it up? Does your brain fail to register what I've repeated?

    No, I have not copied from wikipedia. I mean, you just can't seem to acknowledge when someone else is correct through normal means, can you?

  • @csmybuttt As I said, I bring up airsoft because its immature of you to play with.

    How many times have I said that, airsoft boy.

    And look how butthurt you are, like 5 comments? Can't handle that someone knows a bit more than you?

    God, doesn't even know what an RT-20 is and thinks the .700 nitro is the largest round, lol!

  • @MrThembones What's airsoft have to do with anything I've said, though? I've never used airsoft as a reference to real-steel firearms. So why keep bringing it up? Are you that retarded? Well, I've more than proven you don't know as much as you think you do. Can't handle that, no? I'm sorry, I don't know all the weapons of the world, but I sure as hell know more than you, as my knowledge is far less obscure and useless as yours.

  • @csmybuttt My knowledge of weapons is better than yours. I know weapon names, history, rounds fired, etc etc.

    I wrote a whole school paper on hoplology (which you didn't even know what that is)

    How'd you find me? Did you stalk me until I came across this video to start a flame war?

    I mean, it is BS if you really expect me to think you just happened to come across it around the same time I did, troll.

    You have proven you are an immature brat who plays with toys, thanks m8 :)

  • @MrThembones There you go again with hoplology, like I care. How did I find you? Through your retarded comment about the charging handle. Again, don't fucking flatter yourself; I wasn't even thinking about looking for you. It's just that I can't stand moronic comments.

  • The atkins accelerator is only for the 10/22.

    Did I say 10/22? ugh...no

  • @MrThembones But the 10/22 does fire a 22, right? Does that mean I'm wrong? Nope.

    Then why is filing the trigger specific to a 22? Why not other calibers? Does it work on EVERY SINGLE 22 rifle or pistol, regardless of mechanical differences?

  • @csmybuttt yes, because I said a .22 rifle, the average. The atkin will only work for 10/22.

    So, well yeah you are wrong.

  • @MrThembones So your method works on EVERY weapon chambered in 22? Strange, as there are different trigger mechanisms present for the many kinds of .22 weapons.

  • @csmybuttt For the typical rifle, yes.

    I've seen people do it plenty.

    Quite an interesting, adorable lil gun.

  • @MrThembones Really? Last time I checked, such a conversion is illegal, unless you are a class ii or iii dealer under special circumstances. So if I were to assume you WEREN'T full of shit, then you know that many dealers who perform the conversions? Suppose that's true, then why are you so misinformed about everything?

  • @csmybuttt its class 3. Not 2.

    How am I misinformed, lol.

  • @MrThembones So you know that many class III dealers, and among them, the ones who convert 22s? If that's the case, you should know far more than you think you do (but actually don't).

  • @csmybuttt lol, you idiot.

    You dont know different sizes of the 5.56 (5.56x45, 5.56x39)

    You dont know the difference between uranium and plutonium bombs

    You don't know the largest rifle calliber (lol .700? really? civil war guns go bigger than that! XD)

    You are an arrogant, egotistic little brat. Face it.

  • @MrThembones I googled just in case. There is no 5.56x39.

    Well, I don't know about bombs, but they're not firearms either.

    Largest rifle caliber? Hmm, Civil War I think went up to .88? Hmm, I wish I cared.

    Well, you are an assuming idiot who is quite misinformed about the very basics of firearm related topics. I'd say that's a tougher fate to face.

  • @csmybuttt there is to a 5.56x39 you idiot. Hell, I just binged and googled it, and I'll do it again.

    Ooooh there it is, lol. Even found a picture of one, and a guy asking rather he can shoot it through some AR or something.

    Civil War is not modern ammunition, if I asked that question I would have clearly referenced a civil war gun (and I believe that they actually went up to .90 or .95)

    However I dont include those because they aren't modern or measured the same.

  • @MrThembones Really? I googled it too. Search results show something like 5.56x45 and 7.62x39, but NEVER 5.56x39. Ask anyone else, moron. There is a 5.45x39, but no 5.56x39. I don't care about the largest caliber. Why? Even the .700 NE goes up to $100 a round, so the biggest round I'll ever need to care or know about is the .50BMG, as it's far more applicable. So what's the point of knowing useless and obscure information? I'd rather know how an AR-15 functions than the largest rifle caliber.

  • @csmybuttt The fact that I both used bing, and google and got results of the 5.56x39 shows you are BSing.

    Ok, you want to keep it based around the AR platform, while I expand my information to other rounds and guns.

    So that shows that I will, and do, infact know more and have more information about guns.

    Thanks for contradicting your self again.

  • @MrThembones The 220 you're talking about is 5.45, not 5.56, moron. Again, my knowledge far more practical and applicable in general; The AR was just an example. You know the wrong information, which is far worse than not knowing at all. Where did I contradict myself? I have never said one thing, then said the other, like you have.

  • @csmybuttt No, you are wrong, manman567 just gave one of the links.

  • @csmybuttt Lol, even I just searched it on google you dumb bitch. 5.56x39 is .220

    Look, here is the link name.

    "can you fire .223 rounds from a gun chambered for 5.56x39?" on yahoo answers

  • @xXmanman567Xx Did you click on the god damn link? If you did, you'd realize the answer starts to refer to the 5.45x39 (.220 russian), as the 5.56x39 does not exist. And yes, yahoo answers is the best source highly knowledgeable answers, above anything else, because there is not a single retard on that site. If you're going to post sources, make sure the said source doesn't contradict you, dumbass.

  • @csmybuttt the 5.56x39 is .220 calliber, you moron.

  • @csmybuttt awe, so it does say 5.45x39.

    Ok, thats an honest mistake, lol.

    But yes there is a 5.56x39, because you still didnt even look at the link that says

    "AK-47 5.56x39 or .223 Magazine, 30 round magazines & clips"And still, you contradicted yourself by saying your knowledge only goes to the AR platform, and nothing beyond, as my knowledge in firearms goes well beyond.

    You didnt know what an RT-20 is, you though .700 nitro was the largest round, and I doubt you shot any real guns

  • @MrThembones What? Again, this is one of the several epic fails about you and basic knowledge. If you don't know the basics, what does the obscure and esoteric information matter? I never said that I only know of the AR platform; I am fully aware that other weapons exist and study them as well. I could care less about the RT-20.

    I have shot real guns. Honestly, I wish I haven't, so you would be right, just this once.

  • @MrThembones An "Honest Mistake"? Are you kidding me? You were arguing to your death about it, before checking your facts. If it was really an honest mistake, you would have maybe took a few seconds to make sure, not continue to argue with the wrong information. If it took you that long to admit a mistake, what about everything else you know, or you think you do? Again, what's the use of knowing obscure information, when you obviously know jack shit about the basics?

  • @MrThembones Such an epic fucking fail. 

  • @csmybuttt heres how I see it

    you dont know gun names

    you dont know much of anything beyond the AR platform

    you play with toy guns (lol)

    you dont know the largest rounds (meaning you aren't bright on ammo types, either)

    you got the prices wrong (.700 nitro rounds are well over $100)

    you dont know weapon history

    and its very apperent most things you say are referenced off of wikipedia and you really dont know the information.

    you dont know what hoplology is

  • @MrThembones Here's how I see it: You know random bits of information that isn't very applicable nor worthy of a second thought, yet you fail on the very basics.

    What's wrong with toy guns? Again, I don't use them to refer to real steel, so what is your fetish with the idea?

    I know about the ammo types that are used, not some 20mm military stuff that you will never see, let alone use.

    Again, you are merely flaunting the obscure bits that you know, yet you haven't the faintest clue of the basics.

  • @csmybuttt What are the basics, exactly? You bring them up but you fail to say anything about them.

    Is gun history not basic? Are round sizes and names not basic? Are the names of the guns not basic?

    lol, exactly. You cant tell me round prices, sizes, or anything relative to those.

    Hell, you were telling me flamethrowers and rocket launchers aren't firearms XD

  • @MrThembones The basics? Like knowledge about the more widespread weapons? Like the ones you're likely to see in your hand or others' hands when you go to a range? Tell me, when's the last time you've touched this 20mm round, let alone shot? Gun names? Sure they're important, but not as much as with something rarely used, like the EX-41. I can name a bunch of cartridges and what they're used for, unlike going "HURR DURR I know 20mm."

    Flamethrower is not a firearm, by definition.

  • @csmybuttt I own a 20mm round, lol. HAve I not said I collect ordnance and ammunition? I have seen videos of people shooting 20mm anti-material weaponry.

    If flamethrower isnt a firearm, then how come there are firearm regulations and laws about it? yeah....

    I doubt you can tell me what a PTRS fires, what .50BMG stands for, what calliber a 12.7x99mm is,

    who invented the 30-40 krag, the first shotgun, what a thunder mug is, etc etc.

  • @MrThembones Really? So you can fire this 20mm round standing up, rifle shouldered?

    A firearm is a device that launches a projectile using a controlled explosion. Fire is not a projectile, because it is not matter to begin with.

    PTRS-14.5x114mm

    .50BMG-Browning Machine Gun=12.7x99mm

    Fuck your questions. Answer mine. Hopefully you don't get it wrong like last time. What is the difference between a AK-47 and a Type 56?

  • @csmybuttt oh I answered your question, btw.

    Answer this.

    What does SMAW stand for?

    What is the largest rifle calliber (able to be shot from shoulder)?

  • @MrThembones Shoulder-launched Multipurpose Assault Weapon

    .700 nitro express

    I'm not going to comment any more, as you've more than proven your incompetence (no matter how much you deny it) with the simplest of firearm related information, including your OWN questions. My evidence? Scroll down.

    I also no longer wish to argue with a very misinformed, hotheaded, douchebag teenager.

  • @csmybuttt Oh, Im a douchebag.

    Oh hey, you are wrong again. The largest rifle calliber is 20mm, and yes it is also obvious you wikied those.

    you took forever, and structerd it the exact same as wikipedia did.

    You are misinformed grown man who plays with toy guns.

    Now go die or something, you nuisance.

    This argument was a good laugh.

  • @MrThembones How the fuck do you want me to write out an acronym? Are there different ways? Fucking moron. So 20mm is shoulder fired, with no cradle, or bipod, etc? Again, why don't you tell me how you know I play with toy guns?

    You deluded fucking kid. Your audacity to be an asshole after all this humiliation is rather confounding.

  • @csmybuttt Yes its called the RT-20 you retard. Its an anti-material gun (like you know what that is, lol)

    I told you how I know you play with toy guns, you even said you like airsoft. You got some growing up to do, ya butthurt brat.

  • @MrThembones Sigh. Again, I treat toy guns and real guns separately. It's your own little brain that doesn't allow you to realize this and keeps bringing it up. I don't mention it, so why do you?

    RT-20? Whoop de fucking do. You know obscure bits of useless information, while not knowing jack shit about the basics. Unlike your questions, my question about the 5.56 and 223 is applicable, especially for someone who uses AR-15s.

  • thing is, too, those questions I asked cannot be found on any website. If he knew them, he would have answered by now, but hes looking the answers up.

    Sad. Even if he does, they will be entirely wrong.

  • @MrThembones Yes, because everything you've said so far is correct, right? You should get a new hobby, kid.

  • @csmybuttt and everything you said so far was, too Mr. charging handle only for first clip?

    Look, you fail to answer questions because you simply do not know them. How childish.

  • @MrThembones Really? Nope. Sorry, but I am fully aware of how an AR-15 functions, and how all its features work. Again, I doubt you know the difference between magazine and clip. "clips are used for old guns" is not the correct answer for that.

    "I fail to answer questions because I don't know." How is that childish?

    Do you answer questions that you don't know the answers to? How the hell do you do that?

  • @csmybuttt

    Well then, you admit you dont know those, clearly showing I know more. The Corner shot was created by the SS officers from use along tanks. It was a curved supressor that deflected the bullet into any enemy coming up along armored vehicles.

    Thompson M1928 is called the tommy gun.

    And (if you dont know this, you are a retard and need to go back to CoD) the Chinal Lakes real and proper name is EX-41, a 40mm, pump action grenade launcher.

    Go back to plastic guns, please.

  • @MrThembones The Cornershot was invented in israel in the 1980s(?) that allows a pistol to be placed in its arm and the operator safely behind a corner. What you're mentioning is the Krummlauf, or bent barrel (not suppressor) that was installed on few STG-44s. It wasn't very useful, considering the barrels did not last more than a few hundred rounds.

  • @csmybuttt congrats, you were right about one thing.

    You apperently wikied both of those.

    How do I know?

    A. how late it was.

    B. how you at first claimed to not know the answer, but magically pop right back up with another one.

    Look, how about this, you know a good bit. I know a good bit.

    You know more than others I have encountered " gearboxes keep guns from overheating" "Its not cheytec, its intervention!"

  • @MrThembones Actually, I just didn't want to answer you. However, when you gave me those ridiculous answers, I just had to say something. I mean, if you were able to answer YOUR OWN quiz correctly, I wouldn't have said anything.

  • @csmybuttt my answers were correct, brat.

  • @MrThembones Sorry, but you completely failed on the CornerShot answer. In fact, that was the reason I've decided to say anything at all.

    And Thompson=Tommy. Do you not see the connection? Yes, the M1928 is iconic, but that doesn't mean that specific model is the only one to be called Tommy Gun.

    So what about that 10/22 question? Were you going to say something about the Atkins Accelerator?

  • @MrThembones Every Thompson Submachine gun (M1921, M1928, M1, M1A1) is ALL Tommy gun, as Tommy is short for "Thompson". Nothing too complicated there.

    The multi-shot grenade launcher? It wasn't very reliable, so it wasn't fielded extensively.

  • @csmybuttt The most notable tommy gun, and biggest Icon of it is the M1928 with grip.

    The pump action EX41 was never used in combat due to low reliability and was never finally produced (despite how cool it is :( )

  • @MrThembones How do you feel about not knowing the actual answers to your own quiz? So fail. Are you going to claim I wikipedia'd everything just now? If you must know, I actually didn't, but you can think whatever helps you sleep at night.

  • @csmybuttt declining my offer?

    I dont care about my knowing the asnwers, it was obvious, I mean for the love of God I wrote them.

  • @MrThembones Yeah, that's what is so sad about your quiz. You wrote them, yet you don't even know the answers to them. Go ahead, look up cornershot, or tommy gun.

    And go ahead and accuse me of copying off wikipedia, going back to playing with my plastic guns, etc...

  • @csmybuttt I knew the answers to them fine. The STG-44 modification can be called a cornershot, because basically it is exactly what it was. that makes it wrong because I didn't use a specific name?

    What I find sad is how childish you are acting.

    Go play with your toy guns before thinking you know stuff because you can quote wikipedia.

  • @MrThembones Yes, because the CornerShot is actually a copyrighted name. It's not like the bent barrel (not suppressor, moron) didn't have a name; it was Krummlauf.

    I find it pretty fucking pathetic you:

    Fail to admit when you're wrong;

    Administer a quiz you can't even answer properly;

    Insist I get my knowledge from inappropriate sources;

    Accuse me of merely quoting wiki.

  • and yeah, I know manman567 in real life. I made the account for him.

    And that means we are gay? lol, mature of you.

  • lol, loving how long its taking you to comment. You just failed big time, man.

    Not even funny. Caught you in your own game.

    What did you think I wouldn't check? I always check. I mean, you quoted it almost exactly.

  • @MrThembones I never denied using wikipedia, now did I? Of course, I knew most of the stuff I have typed; I just don't want to write the wrong information, like you.

  • "The AR-15 is based on the 7.62 mm AR-10, designed by Eugene Stoner of the Fairchild ArmaLite corporation."

    straight from wikipedia, omfg XD

  • What are you using to make this?

  • @P3zDawg a mouse and a keyboard.

  • @sonotover lol

  • thanks for remembering the charging handle

  • @MrThembones What? I hate charging handle animations, because they're unrealistic and unnecessary.

  • @csmybuttt good luck shooting a gun without at first pulling the charging handle.

    In almost all cases, with a fresh clip being put into the gun, the charging handle needs pulled.

    Plus it looks cooler and is more realistic :P

    Believe me, I know what Im talking about (hoplology ftw)

  • @MrThembones Yeah, the first mag ONLY. Subsequent reloads only require pushing the bolt catch, which is far faster and more ergonomic. There is no reason to use the charging handle after that first MAGAZINE (not clip; only retards say clip) on any AR-15 patterned rifle. In fact, most modern rifles have some sort of bolt retention device so charging handle actuation is not necessary after every mag change.

    You know what you're talking about? Complete and utter bullshit.

  • @csmybuttt clips are actually what older weapons shot ;)

    I say clip cause I have a garbage keyboard and want to type as less as possible. But it is also if the magazine before is completely used and a new one is put in, then charging handle is needed.

    It also looks much cooler ;)

    I know what I am talking about? lol, says the kid who thinks its first clip only.

  • @MrThembones You complete fucking moron. After the last round in a magazine is fired, the follower in the magazine prevents the bolt from slamming into battery. Once a new magazine is inserted, the bolt catch button is pressed and the bolt goes into battery.

    Sure, pulling the charging handle is cooler, but it is completely unnecessary.

    Seems like you can't tell the difference between buttstock and barrel, let alone clip and magazine.

  • @csmybuttt I love how arrogant your channel is " every ones an idiot but mah!"

    hahaha, pathetic. Kid, dont talk shit about my knowledge of weaponry. You probably learn facts from CoD and airsoft as far as I know. I actually study them and collect ordenance.

    Now please, run along with your 0 uploads, 56 friends, and what, 2 subscribers?

    hmmmmm

  • @MrThembones You actually collect ordnance? Then certainly you just haven't had ANY experience with the AR-15 platform, have you? Better yet, I think you're just straight up full of shit.

    So what, my lack of videos is some sort of indicator of my intelligence? Honestly, having no uploads is a lot better than having 40 or so shitty ones.

    Don't call me a fucking kid because I actually know a thing or two about firearms.

  • @csmybuttt I will call you kid. For the love of Christ you play airsoft. I doubt you even know what ordenance is.

    Look, friend, I have studied hoplology for a long time ( as if you even know what THAT is, either)

    The only person on youtube I have ever met who actually knew more than I was a gun manufacturer.

    And yes, I have fired an AR. I have fired real guns, not collect experience from airsoft ;)

    No offense, though. I dont like it when people question my knowledge, especially about guns.

  • @MrThembones Well, it's coming from a guy who doesn't know the difference between clips and magazines, and does not know how to reload an AR-15 patter rifle. Ordnance? Yes, I know what that is, even enough to actually spell it right. I don't care who you know. Just because there's airsoft on my channel, doesn't mean that's all I know, moron. Way to be a judge of character. Question your knowledge? What knowledge?

  • Comment removed

  • @csmybuttt its ordenance, lol.

    I know the difference between a clip and a magazine, so calm down.

    lol, my knowledge is greater than yours is you arrogant pig. You see, I actually study weaponry, not learn from video games and airsoft.

    Oh, and my videos are shitty? lol, look at you trying to get personal, lol. Pathetic.

    "YOU DOHNT PULLLE CHARJING HANDL UNLES ITZ DA FIRST MAGAZEEN!"

    lmfao. I bet you dont even know the difference between 20mm and .50BMG. hell, you probably call it 50cal

  • @MrThembones What the fuck? How smug do you have to be to type as if no one else in this world studied firearms? Again, you can claim to know more, but your words have suggested otherwise. I didn't mention anything about your channel until you did about mine, fucking attention-span deficit moron. Yes, personal attacks ARE pathetic, ESPECIALLY when they're unwarranted, like yours. Why did you type like a retard for as a mockery of me? Don't assume shit you know nothing about, you fucking kid.

  • @csmybuttt Because, you are a retard.

    Go back to your CoD's, leave fire arm studies to us big kids.

    Your name is familiar, do I know you?

    I think I got into a flame war with you before. Are you stalking me? truly pathetic.

    Look, I have shot guns, studied guns, own a gun, collect ordnance, on BOCN, draw guns, replicate guns on animated programs (use to)

    I've made gun quizes, answered gun quizes, written school papers on hoplology (sorry for the big word, dude.)

    What have you done?

  • @MrThembones I have been familiar with firearms when you were busy pissing your pants, kid. I don't know you, and I'm glad I don't; being around that kind of stupidity is bad for my health. I don't need your gun-related resume; what makes you think I give a shit? Fact is, you have more than proven your incompetence in firearm related topics. I could reply on why using the charging handle is detrimental, but that would be too long.

  • @csmybuttt My stupidity? Incomparison to yours? lol, ok, thats cute.

    Pissing my pants? Well, i doubt you are that much older than me (infact with how egotistic and arrogant you are, I find it hard to say you are older than me, plus your liking for airsoft.)

    As far as I know, you are an airsoft fag thinking he does know a thing or two being a cocksure queer with wikipedia on another tab.

    And yes, I do know you, and we have met. need to get your memory checked, kind sir.

  • @MrThembones Well, I was 15 quite a few years back. What's wrong with airsoft? I see it as a more realistic alternative to paintball, not some replacement for real-steel firearms. Therefore, airsoft videos say nothing about my age or character.

    It's great you know me; and I'm supposed to remember each and every exchange I have on youtube. Don't flatter yourself; you're not important enough to be remembered.

  • @csmybuttt listen to your prissy little self. You sound like a bratty 8 year old "your not important enough to be remembered" I cant take you seriously, lol. You sound like a 10 year old on his dad's account XD

    You were wrong from the beggining about the charging handle (way off, lol) and it is apperent you never actually shot an AR-15. I mean, you cant even tell me what weapon the AR-15 is based from.

  • @MrThembones What? Are you annoyed that you aren't important enough for me to remember?

    How am I wrong about the charging handle? Look up any video on this site. After loading the first magazine, the charging handle is only used to clear jams. Otherwise, the bolt catch does the job of chambering a round. Look them up, moron. What the AR-15 is based on? The AR-10. Now stop quizzing me on stupid trivia in hopes I get something wrong and make yourself feel better.

  • @csmybuttt YOU DONT USE THE CHARGING HANDLE TO CLEAR JAMS YOU USE THE FORWARD ASSIST YOU RETARD JESUS CHRIST HAVE YOU EVER SHOT A GUN IN YOUR LIFE? XD

    Idk, alot of the videos I see, the charging handle is pulled alot, lol.

    OMFG THE AR-15 IS BASED FROM THE M4 NOT AR-10 YOU ARE AN ABSOLUTE IDIOT XD GO BACK TO COD! NOW, DO IT, YOU ARE WAY TOO STUPID! XD

  • @MrThembones You have never even touched an AR-15, have you? The forward assist is to push the bolt forward into battery because the charging handle/bolt catch did not provide enough tension. In fact, the forward assist does the EXACT OPPOSITE of clearing a jam. smh

    Are you some sort of die-hard troll? The M4 (introduced in 1994) is a chopped version of the M16, which is the military version of AR-15 (Designed 1957), which is derived from the AR-10. Holy shit, you are beyond retarded.

  • @csmybuttt I have fired an AR-15 exactly 3 times. Each one had an ACOG, and when it jammed, I never touched

    the charging handle. It was forward assist.

    AND FOR THE LOVE OF CHRIST YOU ARE QUOTING WIKIPEDIA AGAIN XD