Susan soaring 'A' vowel causes us to cry because the pattern has a decrescendo and a crescendo volume control therefore penetrating our lachrymal glands with the soaring volumes and her clarity of the the a vowel. she also has a beautiful usage of the vibrato . when her arm rises up she is able to open up the 'a' vowel to a soar and emotions peak and release tears
There is no "secret " code as you say..it's just the humility along with the voice of Susan Boyle that hits people's heart and that she is able to return mockery to it's sender in the most meekest of ways..
So the clock is ticking . . and ticking and the time will come for the outcome in front of our eyes to see and understand what can happen that far . . LOL
Life is very complex and subtle on our clear understanding of the underlying reasoning.
Looking at the viewing on Youtube Ruthie Henshall has no single video with more than half-million hits. Susan main video is near 58 millions by now. The whole world hits on Susan should be near 350 millions.
Susan still have two more rounds to go, on semi-final and final.
Susan does not need guidance.
By now she is a leader far ahead pleasing the most humans on earth like never done before.
Yep, those are vowels with their special sounding . .
Pay attention on which kind of sound people cry listening songs. . vowels .
Consonants can be fricatives or plosive and can be more irritating than pleasing.
Celine Dion uses a lot of consonantal sound making it charming and sensual, but hard to blow people mind for crying. Opera is more efficient for crying because of soaring vowels from the Italian language in the lyrics.
Tbh, I think your just bsing us with lots of information when all shes doing is. Starting soft and Crescendoing up and just going SHAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MEEEEEEEEE
Yeah, but saying that she picked the right song doesn't mean she was studyng and analyzing all possible songs for this event, she just pick the one which was the most deep and soft at a time...
So... pretty song + amazing voice + right notes = This
The CODE is behind the amazing voice. I compared her voice with near 30 other females and it is easy to observe that her voice is unique in a perfect way to achieve a breakthrough.
Why is a strawberry delicious? It has higher levels of fructose, softer mass, concentrated taste.
Why is her voice amazing?
Just because it pleases our senses and affect our emotions with a sort of appropriate sound dynamics . . . the CODE
She does not know about a code, just to do her best and win.
so, it is a gift from nature that has properties and characteristics and can be copied, enhanced and do even better to affect our emotions with more efficiency LOL
Always you can find reasons to explain why you like things that please you the most . .LOL
When you learn about the properties of your feelings affecting your body even an orgasm can have a higher pressure . . .lol
Probably you neither know what is natural nor what is an insult.
Susan does not know that emotions can have a CODE for higher effect. You never make people cry with samba or rock because crying requires a specific CODE to make our brain render specific actions to squeeze our lachrymal glands.
By now as confirmed by Alain Boublil & Claude Michel Schonberg lyrics composer of 'I dreamed a dream' song that has been sang the best in 25 years. Susan got the CODE unaware of it.
well no shit the song is emotional and is intended to inspire...come on "I dreamed a dream"!? Martin Luther King had a dream and made millions cry with his I have a dream speech. This song in particular brings many emotions on diffrent levels because alot of people can relate to it. Of course a sick guitar solo isnt going to make you cry its gonna amp you up, thats what its intended to do, its not science.
you "tear" from onions, cold winds..its all emotion..its not a sound pattern its nostalgia and emotions that cause someone to feel overly sad or happy, seriously are you a fucken robot because you dont even have to be well educated to figure out why such a thing brings you to tears, unless your a ignorant douche such as yourself trying to state some theory of code
you call me a fucken brat again and this grown ass man will body your pussy ass into the clouds, hows that for code, you wouldnt dare say that to my face i guarantee that much, cheers psycho bitchass
Thanks, next time when I listen to one of my favorite artists I will have my equipment and some pen and paper ready trying to analyze the performance in a scientific way, because I really need to know why I like it. The next step is doing the same with my wife, favorite car and boxer shorts.
You are just missing the purpose of science which deals with the underlying functioning of nature.
Dealing with you wife you need to be aware that nature did not invent marriage, but a strong urge to procreate, please yourself, and help to raise offspring as replacement.
Your car is a transportation system but keep in mind that your muscles cannot be retired to a sedentary life.
You were born naked and clothes help to hide a neglected body.
Connie Talbot made Amanda Holden cry in her first audition in 2007. In the semi-finals Amanda did not cry, so Connie came back in the final with the same song scoring pretty high making Amanda cry again.
Understanding this process of affecting human emotion is a plus to contestants sharpening their skills toward some details that can end up being decisive on their achievement.
Making people cry brings high level of satisfaction and a fast response toward an aiming breakthrough . . .
No way, many contestants like her in the same looking having not talent were easily dumped and mocked mercilessly.
Her voice is far better than professionals she dreamed to be. She has a specific voice pattern that makes people cry.
They had to bow instantly to a talent to unique and pleasing with a soaring penetrating voice that squeezes our lachrymal glands and make our face reddened.
Getting there, but you need to consider the angle over time and how many finger pointing to the right. If you pay attention when she crosses the 90 degree she open her mouth wider and release most of the secret . . .
The most weeping power comes her arms are opened wider giving her more breathing capacity to her lungs as she exhale putting her scent over the mike and some protein from her saliva enter the mic sound detector spreading a computer virus that is added to video. DNA is in the virus.
A TRUE HONEST SCIENTIST would have ISOLATED the alleged code pattern/s, put it to the test, documented it, handed it to third parties for reproduction/confirmation/evaluation/validation, PRIOR to the public exposure, and ONLY THEN could it be called a discovery, and made public without any hesitation of deceiving the public. The complete OPPOSITE of what you are doing!
Because while you present no evidence (For WHATEVER reason), thats ALL they are, if you KNEW and take ANY responsibility for scientific work, you would have NEVER done that in that manner.
Attitude that highly compromises your supposed scientist status.
absolutely peoples understanding of their perceptions on that incident, the feeling they developed towards it, + logical analytical response appropriate to the situation experienced etc.. Pretending that the brain works on its own with no control of the individual. In other words; you speculate big time, beat around the bush as much as possible trying to avoid confronting the FACT that U have NO CLUE of what you r talking about trying to convince people to BELIEVE your ASSUMPTIONS.
Waw, people cried and they are curious why they cannot hold themselves on such conditions. Their physiology is playing trick under Susan magic CODE . LOL
Right, there are several mechanisms which makes it work. You mentioned a couple of them
BOTH of them triggered by patterns of *reactive* response to a PHYSICAL stimulus.
And -of course- missed EMOTIONS, something that you seem to believe it doesnt exist, (And havent shown to have ANY knowledge on the subject whatsoever) as theres plenty of evidence on your comments exposing the fact that you pretend to explain why people cries, by PHYSICAL means, disregarding completely and
My sense of true and false is very flexible because time, distance, or angle can change from one to another. I do like to observe coherence on Logical Interrelations.
TRUE is far more complex than that because you can change your mind whenever you get arguments to renew your opinion. You cannot lose a sense, but change it to other grounds.
Any person can have a point of view and there is not need of agreement, but usually coherence gives more credit to reason.
Come on. physiology does not work this way. The lachrymal gland works whenever it needs to work, and there are many mechanisms to make it work . . . onions, cold weather, etc. . .
The phrase means what it says, and you are right, I'm respectful of other people views, which has nothing to do with "other people ACTIONS".
For instance: U seem to think that a sound affects your body like in your "glass" example, which basically is just a sound which vibrates in the same frequency than the glass. An inanimate object. Although you mention "emotions" as well , so your take is not very clear, but I do respect your view. You R not telling others..."that's the way it is"
There are BIG doubts that people cries when listening to opera I never did, and personally know many whom didnt as well. In fact, if you actually OBSERVE people in there, youll be able to see that the vast majority do NOT, I repeat DO NOT cry
If you watch Paul Pottis also you can cry because opera is done in Italian Language that offers a language structure more appropriate to affect our senses. Latin languages prevail vowel sounds.
Susan Boyle has this soaring characteristic of voice that better matches our senses affecting our emotions.
Such expression of angel's voice is just a better description of a voice pattern that enchant our brain with more appropriate sound pattern to electrify the brain softly.
The eardrums collects the appropriate sound patterns and send stimulus to the brain that triggers many effects like lachrymal glands constriction as well as redness in the face and other features . .
Onion model is chemistry of acid sulfenic that generates in water sulfuric acid stinging the end of the nerve. . .
Sorry I thought you were talking about emotions, now you went back to the MEST model, (obviously b/c U have no Idea of whats cooking on this field) and Im not interested in the PHYSICAL effect of an EMOTION developed by the reception, processing, understanding, and Analytical proper response, to and specific incident experienced by the individual
Plus U have exposed already the fact that you arent able to produce evidence, as your wish to keep deceiving people with unfounded claims.
Pas de quoi. Je suis enchante de faire cette choise . . . Elle es une chanteuse trés important pour tout le monde et toute personne qui veu plaisir avec la musique. . . au revoir .
What's wrong with U man? You state -same paragraph- that I'm not smart, that I'm not "knowledgeable", and close it with this: "I would never state anything about someone else ignorance"
Are you on drugs or something?
I know more about the limitations of human understanding and perception/s than you would ever dream of, pal
Did U even heard me at the beginning a comment I made about quantum mechanics?
Furthermore, why you refuse to put your "secret code" to USE and show how knowledgeable U are?
Are you sure you got anything on Quantum Mechanics?
I had to review a paper on Soil Aggregation and the technique is about how the soil behaves when dry. There are thousands of scientific papers about it.
The question is:
Which soil works without water?
None, and all those papers are useless . . .
When you break the atoms into smaller particles how do you know that those particles existed inside an intact atom?
Perhaps you are creating some particles when breaking the atom apart
We are the ONLY ones "judging". Nature do not judge, just = IS.
And we NEED to make judgments, we wouldn't have advanced the little that we did without it.
How would you study microorganisms without a microscope? Judgment had to be used in order to accomplish the creation of such a device. And we should be grateful for that.
Sorry can help you with that. Don't know. I know it can work with liquid all by itself. I mean I don't know, but saw a Jap scientist working on it and he says it was successful however I didn't keep track of it, but he had quite a plantation running on it, of all sort of fruits and veges much bigger than average.
Yeap, the atom is giving head aches even at this point in time.
Everything is being taken care of in the most appropriate way. I know how the system works and the outcome is very comfortable as my expectation is just reasonable.
Problems are created and solved and life goes on since the beginning when Carbon started being packed by photosynthetic processes. The climate was good at the time and no C was retained yet. Global warming is a huge flaw because people do not understand nature even less C cycle and glaciation eras.
Most people know by know, global warming is nothing but a scam designed for big companies to make money, and taking over people's freedoms WW.
As for the rest, I'm not very sure of what are you referring to, but it doesn't seem to be the subject of this video. In other words, your unfounded claim.
And once again we can see how "accurate" "knowledgeable" and "professional" you are:
"the sound pattern seems to be behind it"
SEEMS TO BE? SEEMS TO BE?
EXCUSE ME; *SEEMS* TO BE?!
Is THAT ^^^ what you call "science" ?!
This is very simple: U make a claim, U can't prove it, even acknowledge it. Now even express it as "a possibility", yet keep portraying it as a "fact" = *LEARN* "why"...
If you R gonna keep deceiving people at least tell them the truth, instead of "learn why" = "BELIEVE" *me*
As matter of fact I already gave the CODE and you did not grab any tip about . .. LOL
Crying is a gland like the same in the prostate you use when cumming. They hold liquid substances to be released. Naturally the prostate need far more pressure to release millions of sperms to a fertile land.
If you know how to make you mind work on your prostate when can have the highest ejaculation ever for being able to build required pressure . ..
Lachrymal gland can respond to many mechanisms like sulphenic acid from onion which end up forming sufluric acid and irritation to the nerve ending stinging and provoking tears.
There is a market of around 85 bl in the US to any chemical that could help females get orgasm.
So are you implying that people cries because the "sound code" hits the lachrymal gland and that's what makes it to "produce the tears"...which makes people to "uncontrollably cry" just like the onion???
If so, like I told you a zillion times already, ISOLATE the "code", expose 1000 people to it, record it, post it so people can SEE, what you are talking about, instead of having to "BELIEVE" your unfounded claim.
It doesn't matter "how" a glands operates. What matters is what triggers the procedure.
You claim that it's a "hidden sound code", and no, you haven't presented such a "sound code".
You are just beating around the bush, trying to distract the attention of the FACT that you can produce evidence of such a "code" because YOU HAVE NONE!
That's all there is. Don't know what you little "agenda" may be, but is quite obvious that you are up to deceiving people for whatever "reason".
And your "convenient habit" of "ignoring" whatever comment exposing the fact that you have no proper qualifications on the field, doesn't go "unnoticed", just so you know...
I am curious what is the proper qualification to for this issue. I do have a strong foothold on biological sciences as well as remote sensing and GIS. LOL. Above all I am a scientist with good understanding on boundaries of knowledge . .
You tell me Mr "wise". You are pretending that Ur alleged "sound code" triggers "uncontrollable crying" just like onion does, disregarding completely all other ingredients present on the mix, including people's perceptions, processing of it, understanding, and analytical response to an incident full of emotions, pretending that people are just a "piece of meat with legs", or "animals" that have no control on their bodies, just because YOU "say so"
Interesting theory Tubarc. Honestly I didn't see that much difference - except maybe between those that were trained singers and those that were untrained. We'll easily see if it's something she is consciously doing or not the next time she performs.
Well, our specific internal sensors require some sort of procedure to work out their goal like milking a caw or having an orgasm. Continuous stimulus under certain range of variation can achieve the final expected delivery . . . sound patterns does affect our sensory in the brain and release oxytocin. Jogging also release endorphins which provides a high mood and cozy feeling . . .
Nature has been in charge deciding since the beginning who procreates and make up to the life cycle. Now, man with those 'pros' are putting everybody in production with many techniques like IVF.
Nature has a quality control system. Imagine if you go to any assembling production and let the flawed parts going to consumers.
Because of money as 'pros' we are messing with our essence pretending to understand what we are doing . . .
Obesity can be fixed in a couple of centuries as we see in front of our eyes the consequences of modern life.
But, the mess on our genetic composition may take longer to repair as we get along and learn more about nature . . .
I already told you that understanding and comprehension is the main core of science. . .
At least we are learning that developed countries do not know even how to handle money even less abundant food and plenty of machinery . . . Nature is sturdy and merciless . .LOL
ORGANIC problems that develops on the body, have NOTHING to do with FEELINGS which belongs on the field of the mind. The fact that you see physical MANIFESTATION of it, doesn't mean the ORIGIN is "organic"
We are more than a piece of meat with legs, "senior" . Lighten up!
And take responsibility for your own actions, it didn't go "unnoticed" the fact that you "conveniently" ignored the fact that you are one of the deceivers, making claims for which you have no evidence to prove such claim.
It doesn't matter what I heard or didn't heard. Or whether I'm "smart" or not. What matters is that YOU "claim" there's a "hidden code" that makes people cry, didn't present any evidence, yet present it as a "fact"
"Learn why/can touch your soul with hope and make you weep" "Susan Boyle Secret Weapon - a CODE".
You already acknowledge you have no evidence, now you CLAIM having it. And just as the previous CLAIM, is nothing but a fraud, coming from some1 who has no Idea about the human mind
Sorry, but you got trapped by your own shallow understanding:
Code is a very complex word. DNA is a CODE that we understand nothing on the logical sequence. Life built a CODEt on the core of our existence but we have no idea how to assemble it simply because we do not understand much about handling matter at molecular level . . .
If you watch all my videos you may start figuring out the CODE . . . LOL
Whether DNA is a code or not it makes no difference.
You claim is that "she with her 'code' makes people cry".
Even if you refer to dna, it does NOT change the fact that you are talking about something PHYSICAL, (Starting end) supposedly "affecting" something PHYSICAL (receiver end) that "causes" the incident to come to existence.
Just one little detail; THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OF SUCH! AKA = LIE!
Electromagnetic radiation in the sound waves is quite a code and can even have an equation or a multivariate analysis . . . You are not expecting me to deliver it straight in your hands .. LOL
Regardless. You are still dealing with PHYSICS, and that has no place on the mind.
And I don't need you to "deliver" anything.
All I'm telling you is to stop deceiving people by claiming they are gonna "learn" something, you can't prove. I already told you, at most you could get people to "believe" your claim. But they are not gonna learn anything from a baseless claim, for which you present no evidence whatsoever. Unless you are trying to create a "cult".
There's NO EVIDENCE in any "table". Your "evidence" only exist on your mind, and NOWHERE ELSE!
Your statement itself reflects the fact that THERE'S NO EVIDENCE!
You portrait something as a "fact", and now you're gonna look for "the underlying reasoning"..? In other words = THE EVIDENCE TO PROVE IT!
Don't know where your knowledge of science comes from, but it works 180 degrees on the opposite direction, it seems that you missed class when they came to that part.
I wish you were a PhD I would save time and we could chat in the same level. This book may help you self-schooling:
George Gale, Theory of Science: An introduction to the History, Logic, and Philosophy of Science. McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Being honest with you most PhDs do not know much about Philosophy of Science and it gives them troubles to understand how science works in the underlying core.
Book are written by PEOPLE. As I already stated this event is a response of a perception processed and understood through thought process. No by an "uncontrollable" body part.
I know a guy in Cali, who writes recipe books. He takes recipes from magazines from all over the world and make it into a book. Does it means he's a "Pro", executive chief?! NO! In fact don't ask him to fry an egg b/c he has NO CLUE!
You don't even make sense. As for me "learning fast", you have no Idea who you are talking to pal.
Like I said, stop lying to people, because while you don't present EVIDENCE of your claim, that's all that is; rubbish. And the ONLY thing you could accomplish with it is to DECEIVE whoever buy that nonsense.
Then YOU "incriminate" main stream science, for being "deceitful". Well guess what?!
I was able to teach my dog a carnivore to eat fruits:
111 Tubarc - My Dog Loves Fruit
I am assuming that you can learn faster since you are a human.
The game of playing nature is just a question of finding more coherence since there is no Court to judge . . . Nature does not care about our interpretation . . . being loyal is just a question of perfection . . .
There is no crime in science . . . but things that match and make sense . . . There is no authority to judge science . . just nature !!!!
There are crimes committed by SOME scientists. Not by "science".
No one said that "nature cares or not" about our interpretation, so that's irrelevant.
Dogs and humans are two very different living organisms, and that's despite of what "fellow Jung & partners" CLAIM about it without EVIDENCE TO PROVE IT! just like...hmmm...who could it be... oh! yest YOU!
One acts under reaction patterns, the other has A MIND to analyze, evaluate, & understand info.
It makes no difference. U can eat whatever you want, it will not affect ONE BIT, the way thought processes take place, b/c it occurs on the mind and that's not a physical part of the body. So whatever involves Mest, plays no part in it at all. And there's where your possible knowledge about physics and the field of the mind departs from one other. That is also where you enter a field for which you have no knowledge whatsoever, and all of your assertions prove it far beyond any reasonable doubt
Another childish response coming from a supposed "PhD". You know? I thought it was a "cultural" difference, but now I'm starting to doubt whether you have a PhD for real.
People don't say: "I'm" or "I have, a PhD", in fact I never heard anyone expressing it like that anywhere, including foreigners. Everybody states in which field they have a PhD.
Having a PhD in one field doesn't make you "an expert" on the rest of the fields. In fact you could be completely ignorant. It seems U don't know that
When any person claim to be a PhD I just peek at their waistline to see how much of that accumulated knowledge is used on their own good.
They are supposed to be healthier than laypeople devoid of educational background. People who are revealing nature secrets are supposed to keep their lives in balance with their existence. . .
Diplomas is more for money making and not improving their lifestyles . .
Indeed it seems that Susan found a sound pattern more appropriate to make our brain release oxytocin squeezing our lachrymal glands by combining natural talent with IT technology for a legendary breakthrough. Her sound signature is quite unique with many insights to allow important advancement toward mind control. She does not know why she is doing it but the phenomenon has many plausible answers for discussion.
Yep, I discovered a boiled water hot enough to heat the global community with more than 300 hits on internet. You can can it green weepy energy . . LOL
This was an outstanding production. So much research and thinking. it's awesome, but then too few viewers have the ability to see what you're saying is true! :D But you are right on!!! :P
Yep, most viewers are just curious laypeople. But Susan trespassed new boundaries never set foot before. She has the gift which she is also impressed with the outcome . . . Sound patterns has the key to our emotions and this is the CODE she delivered . .
There is no evidence about the 'Big Bang' because it was not recorded and cannot be duplicated with certainty that it can portray the real one, if there was one . .. ? ? ?
To pack some voice patterns and test their power on human feelings and emotions is a quite easy task. . .
Science has lots of distortions and manipulation like in the music industry because they need to protect budgets and keep society believing they are doing their job . . . . LOL
"Science has lots of distortions and manipulation"
Correction: Certain "Scientists" distort and/or manipulate information and deceive the public with CLAIMS for which they have NO EVIDENCE to PROVE it!
And that's REGARDLESS of the reasons "why" they bring about such a deception.
That's the very reason why I suggested you to be honest and make clear to the public that your claim is indeed a theory of yours, which needs to be investigated and you already acknowledge it, yet didn't correct it.
Let's suppose that I can deliver a CODE to make people weep by a sound pattern . . . What would you do with my findings ? ? ? - Use it to torture terrorists? - Use it to sell more junk food? - Use it to make people gamble at Wall St.? - Use it to make people believe in democracy? Winning or losing is so subtle. . . Alfred Nobel made two huge mistakes in his life. 1. He developed weapons to wage wars. 2. He put price on science. Comprehension is the final step toward nature secrets . . .
This is nothing but a justification. With that "logic", you could claim that you "know" everything there's to know. Childish, and absolutely unscientific.
I am just another one mingling with so many commoners.
I called 'Tubarc" standing for tube + arc as a new conceptions in hydrodynamics for an advanced porosity geometry. It updates 'capillarity' standing on dictionaries for near half a millennium. It borrows insights from the beginning of life when unicellular organisms started to pack and grow to larger ones and needed a biological porosity for fluid dynamics.
I'm another mortal not caring for names but improved etymology . . .
Tubarc you are so amazing!!! . n
Susan soaring 'A' vowel causes us to cry because the pattern has a decrescendo and a crescendo volume control therefore penetrating our lachrymal glands with the soaring volumes and her clarity of the the a vowel. she also has a beautiful usage of the vibrato . when her arm rises up she is able to open up the 'a' vowel to a soar and emotions peak and release tears
leonabmine 2 years ago
getting closer to the core . . . thanks for your input.
Tubarc 2 years ago
yeah lea salonga.. hehe
martilyo04 2 years ago
Not that as good as we might expect
Tubarc 2 years ago
There is a strong reasoning backing up a clear pattern for a specific attained effect.
Tubarc 2 years ago
how is it a code its just the song
iTzzVISiiONS 2 years ago
i never weeped...but yeh
crazzer123 2 years ago
Not all cows are good for milking.
Tubarc 2 years ago
True
crazzer123 2 years ago
There is no "secret " code as you say..it's just the humility along with the voice of Susan Boyle that hits people's heart and that she is able to return mockery to it's sender in the most meekest of ways..
sniper255 2 years ago
Yeah, so people listening to opera and other singer for the reason. I do not think so.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Well, whatever. Just listening to this lyric reminds me of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.
Very timely performance, no doubt.
ezekieloak 2 years ago
GM is coming in the same tune as the dance get along.
Tubarc 2 years ago
what does this prove?
leocharlotte 2 years ago
this proves that there is a way of making people weep .. lol
Tubarc 2 years ago
i dont get it :s
leocharlotte 2 years ago
You need to watch more and pay attention.
Tubarc 2 years ago
LOL she's good and if she is some kind of mindreading freak I really couldn't care less.
n00ster 2 years ago
I did not say mindreading but weeping .. .lol
Tubarc 2 years ago
I never said you did say mindreading. I said I said mindreading , and this is just a bad attempt to get more views
n00ster 2 years ago
Nah, people like what they like . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Her voice pattern has important pattern to affect our emotions deeper and more efficient that others have ever achieved.
Tubarc 2 years ago
So?
kiov 2 years ago
So the clock is ticking . . and ticking and the time will come for the outcome in front of our eyes to see and understand what can happen that far . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
the word "code is put out of context here.
Thriced2286 2 years ago
Your context is too limiting. . probably you do not know about DNA.
Code is a perfect etymology for a specific pattern that delivers outstanding results from voice effect.
Tubarc 2 years ago
voice effect? LOL pattern, right hand green, left foot blue? You sir, are an idiot and your DNA should be cut off from society.
Thriced2286 2 years ago
Hey, thanks. You may like redder strawberries, but I can tell you that they have higher levels of fructose and are sweeter to your taste.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Ruthie in her costumed performance is
the closest one to Susan's. All the others can't touch her. It's almost like Susan used the Ruthie perfornance as a guide.
With some training Susan will be unbelievable. She's is already so amazing. God bless and keep her.
DawnThatt 2 years ago
Life is very complex and subtle on our clear understanding of the underlying reasoning.
Looking at the viewing on Youtube Ruthie Henshall has no single video with more than half-million hits. Susan main video is near 58 millions by now. The whole world hits on Susan should be near 350 millions.
Susan still have two more rounds to go, on semi-final and final.
Susan does not need guidance.
By now she is a leader far ahead pleasing the most humans on earth like never done before.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Yep, those are vowels with their special sounding . .
Pay attention on which kind of sound people cry listening songs. . vowels .
Consonants can be fricatives or plosive and can be more irritating than pleasing.
Celine Dion uses a lot of consonantal sound making it charming and sensual, but hard to blow people mind for crying. Opera is more efficient for crying because of soaring vowels from the Italian language in the lyrics.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Listen Paul Potts and Connie Talbot and when people cry check the sound coming to their ears to make it happen . ..
Tubarc 2 years ago
Tbh, I think your just bsing us with lots of information when all shes doing is. Starting soft and Crescendoing up and just going SHAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA MEEEEEEEEE
ranger296 2 years ago
im pretty sure she knows nothing about secrets... she just have an amazing voice and nobody can danied it
orlandoknow 2 years ago
She may know something about the effect of making people cry by singing. She already said she picked the right song for the event.
Probably she saw what Connie Talbot did in 2007 and that Amanda Holden only cried in the first audition and in the final, but not in the semi-final.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Yeah, but saying that she picked the right song doesn't mean she was studyng and analyzing all possible songs for this event, she just pick the one which was the most deep and soft at a time...
So... pretty song + amazing voice + right notes = This
No secrets at all...
Well, thats my opinion...
orlandoknow 2 years ago
The CODE is behind the amazing voice. I compared her voice with near 30 other females and it is easy to observe that her voice is unique in a perfect way to achieve a breakthrough.
Why is a strawberry delicious? It has higher levels of fructose, softer mass, concentrated taste.
Why is her voice amazing?
Just because it pleases our senses and affect our emotions with a sort of appropriate sound dynamics . . . the CODE
She does not know about a code, just to do her best and win.
Tubarc 2 years ago
exactly!!! that's my point!!!!
Quote:
"Why is her voice amazing?
Just because it pleases our senses and affect our emotions with a sort of appropriate sound dynamics . . . the CODE"
it pleases our senses and affect our emotion... that's not a code... it's a gift from God.
orlandoknow 2 years ago
I agree entirely with you.
But I have a belief that God = Nature.
so, it is a gift from nature that has properties and characteristics and can be copied, enhanced and do even better to affect our emotions with more efficiency LOL
Always you can find reasons to explain why you like things that please you the most . .LOL
When you learn about the properties of your feelings affecting your body even an orgasm can have a higher pressure . . .lol
Tubarc 2 years ago
its not a code, its natural talent...define code because that almost sounds like an insult to susan boyle.
Thriced2286 2 years ago
Probably you neither know what is natural nor what is an insult.
Susan does not know that emotions can have a CODE for higher effect. You never make people cry with samba or rock because crying requires a specific CODE to make our brain render specific actions to squeeze our lachrymal glands.
By now as confirmed by Alain Boublil & Claude Michel Schonberg lyrics composer of 'I dreamed a dream' song that has been sang the best in 25 years. Susan got the CODE unaware of it.
Tubarc 2 years ago
well no shit the song is emotional and is intended to inspire...come on "I dreamed a dream"!? Martin Luther King had a dream and made millions cry with his I have a dream speech. This song in particular brings many emotions on diffrent levels because alot of people can relate to it. Of course a sick guitar solo isnt going to make you cry its gonna amp you up, thats what its intended to do, its not science.
Thriced2286 2 years ago
Crying comes from many sources like cutting onions, cold wind, emotions, and some kind of sound pattern on singing.
Do you know why opera is sang mostly in Italian rich in vowel sounds - soaring sound like Susan Boyle voice pattern . . . You are becoming smart.
BTW science is just the underlying functioning of nature, like understanding and explaining things.
Your brat behavior is also science probably coming from hormone loads and/or scarce good manners lacking politeness. Cheers!
Tubarc 2 years ago
you "tear" from onions, cold winds..its all emotion..its not a sound pattern its nostalgia and emotions that cause someone to feel overly sad or happy, seriously are you a fucken robot because you dont even have to be well educated to figure out why such a thing brings you to tears, unless your a ignorant douche such as yourself trying to state some theory of code
Thriced2286 2 years ago
you call me a fucken brat again and this grown ass man will body your pussy ass into the clouds, hows that for code, you wouldnt dare say that to my face i guarantee that much, cheers psycho bitchass
Thriced2286 2 years ago
Thanks for confirming another theory.
Brats get nasty when they do not understand a subject.
You could be smart and save such vocabulary to your peers or to your mother to let her understand the product of her lovely creation.
You could make her proud . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Comment removed
haigave90 2 years ago
Thanks, next time when I listen to one of my favorite artists I will have my equipment and some pen and paper ready trying to analyze the performance in a scientific way, because I really need to know why I like it. The next step is doing the same with my wife, favorite car and boxer shorts.
cziu2007 2 years ago
You are just missing the purpose of science which deals with the underlying functioning of nature.
Dealing with you wife you need to be aware that nature did not invent marriage, but a strong urge to procreate, please yourself, and help to raise offspring as replacement.
Your car is a transportation system but keep in mind that your muscles cannot be retired to a sedentary life.
You were born naked and clothes help to hide a neglected body.
Nature suggests a healthy lifestyle for balance.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Connie Talbot made Amanda Holden cry in her first audition in 2007. In the semi-finals Amanda did not cry, so Connie came back in the final with the same song scoring pretty high making Amanda cry again.
Understanding this process of affecting human emotion is a plus to contestants sharpening their skills toward some details that can end up being decisive on their achievement.
Making people cry brings high level of satisfaction and a fast response toward an aiming breakthrough . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
tubarc u are a moron theres no secret code in her voice thats making people cry she simply just has an amazing voice
ndimick100 2 years ago
Hey, thanks. You are a nice and smart guy.
Everybody thought that Susan also was a moron with no talent . . . the code is very secret just for people who can grab it . .LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
the secret is the combination of her voice, look, background, and the resonating widely-shared feeling that life is cruel.
towardme 2 years ago
No way, many contestants like her in the same looking having not talent were easily dumped and mocked mercilessly.
Her voice is far better than professionals she dreamed to be. She has a specific voice pattern that makes people cry.
They had to bow instantly to a talent to unique and pleasing with a soaring penetrating voice that squeezes our lachrymal glands and make our face reddened.
Tubarc 2 years ago
its because she moves her arm up :)
LWH125 2 years ago
Getting there, but you need to consider the angle over time and how many finger pointing to the right. If you pay attention when she crosses the 90 degree she open her mouth wider and release most of the secret . . .
The most weeping power comes her arms are opened wider giving her more breathing capacity to her lungs as she exhale putting her scent over the mike and some protein from her saliva enter the mic sound detector spreading a computer virus that is added to video. DNA is in the virus.
Tubarc 2 years ago
A TRUE HONEST SCIENTIST would have ISOLATED the alleged code pattern/s, put it to the test, documented it, handed it to third parties for reproduction/confirmation/evaluation/validation, PRIOR to the public exposure, and ONLY THEN could it be called a discovery, and made public without any hesitation of deceiving the public. The complete OPPOSITE of what you are doing!
In one word, you are a joke body, a bad joke.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Science has no unique recipe or procedure, just coherence matching with nature functioning.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Because while you present no evidence (For WHATEVER reason), thats ALL they are, if you KNEW and take ANY responsibility for scientific work, you would have NEVER done that in that manner.
Attitude that highly compromises your supposed scientist status.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
My scientist status is under US patent 6,766,817. Au revoir. LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
absolutely peoples understanding of their perceptions on that incident, the feeling they developed towards it, + logical analytical response appropriate to the situation experienced etc.. Pretending that the brain works on its own with no control of the individual. In other words; you speculate big time, beat around the bush as much as possible trying to avoid confronting the FACT that U have NO CLUE of what you r talking about trying to convince people to BELIEVE your ASSUMPTIONS.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Waw, people cried and they are curious why they cannot hold themselves on such conditions. Their physiology is playing trick under Susan magic CODE . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
Right, there are several mechanisms which makes it work. You mentioned a couple of them
BOTH of them triggered by patterns of *reactive* response to a PHYSICAL stimulus.
And -of course- missed EMOTIONS, something that you seem to believe it doesnt exist, (And havent shown to have ANY knowledge on the subject whatsoever) as theres plenty of evidence on your comments exposing the fact that you pretend to explain why people cries, by PHYSICAL means, disregarding completely and
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
tears are fluids released from pressure . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
ok, go well cheers
Thim26 2 years ago
Hey, thanks!
Tubarc 2 years ago
shit go manic, plagiarism and the video also taking ta wave
Thim26 2 years ago
Hey, thanks for your input.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Does this look familiar?
WHAT IS TRUE FOR YOU, IS WHAT YOU HAVE SEEN (perceived) YOURSELF, AND WHEN YOU LOSE THAT, YOU HAVE LOST EVERYTHING.
It is on Gmmaverick's profile.
It implies that he would be respectful of other people's views. I honestly think he has let himself down badly by his comments here.
Weedod1 2 years ago
My sense of true and false is very flexible because time, distance, or angle can change from one to another. I do like to observe coherence on Logical Interrelations.
TRUE is far more complex than that because you can change your mind whenever you get arguments to renew your opinion. You cannot lose a sense, but change it to other grounds.
Any person can have a point of view and there is not need of agreement, but usually coherence gives more credit to reason.
Tubarc 2 years ago
So, are you implying that under certain conditions, the "lachrymal gland" wouldn't be affected, and won't make people cry????????
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Come on. physiology does not work this way. The lachrymal gland works whenever it needs to work, and there are many mechanisms to make it work . . . onions, cold weather, etc. . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
The phrase means what it says, and you are right, I'm respectful of other people views, which has nothing to do with "other people ACTIONS".
For instance: U seem to think that a sound affects your body like in your "glass" example, which basically is just a sound which vibrates in the same frequency than the glass. An inanimate object. Although you mention "emotions" as well , so your take is not very clear, but I do respect your view. You R not telling others..."that's the way it is"
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
There is not doubt that people cry a lot listening to opera . ..
Have you ever listening opera in English?
Why not?
Tubarc 2 years ago
There are BIG doubts that people cries when listening to opera I never did, and personally know many whom didnt as well. In fact, if you actually OBSERVE people in there, youll be able to see that the vast majority do NOT, I repeat DO NOT cry
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
You have problems to perceive the world amplitude and general variability.
Not everybody is obese or diabetics.
Prevailing trends is what counts on understanding some complex and subtle issues. . .
This message show that your analytical power is very limiting as well as your capacity to understand and argue with Logics and Coherence.
This also explains why you are bothering and picking me on. . . . You have problems to assume your limiting sensory power . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
If the majority does not cry it all means that Susan can improve her CODE to affect a larger number . .. LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
I think she is using her voice with her whole heart and so a certain power manifests? A sound can vibrate and shatter a glass.
Music affects our emotions but I find the sound of nature...wind, rain, waves and bird and animal sounds.more powerful than any song.
There is an earthy quality to Susan's voice and yet people say she has the voice of an angel.
I feel she has tapped into the "Vibration of the Universe" and sings with a voice which transmits many things to us on an intuitive level.
Weedod1 2 years ago
If you watch Paul Pottis also you can cry because opera is done in Italian Language that offers a language structure more appropriate to affect our senses. Latin languages prevail vowel sounds.
Susan Boyle has this soaring characteristic of voice that better matches our senses affecting our emotions.
Such expression of angel's voice is just a better description of a voice pattern that enchant our brain with more appropriate sound pattern to electrify the brain softly.
Tubarc 2 years ago
That's a HUGE change, from the "animal" scenario.
How did that happened?????
Oh! So now you are an expert on "emotions"???
How interesting!
Well then, let's hear it from Mr "wise", how exactly it affects our emotions, and what happened to the "onion model"??????????
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
This is a piece of cake . ..
The eardrums collects the appropriate sound patterns and send stimulus to the brain that triggers many effects like lachrymal glands constriction as well as redness in the face and other features . .
Onion model is chemistry of acid sulfenic that generates in water sulfuric acid stinging the end of the nerve. . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Sorry I thought you were talking about emotions, now you went back to the MEST model, (obviously b/c U have no Idea of whats cooking on this field) and Im not interested in the PHYSICAL effect of an EMOTION developed by the reception, processing, understanding, and Analytical proper response, to and specific incident experienced by the individual
Plus U have exposed already the fact that you arent able to produce evidence, as your wish to keep deceiving people with unfounded claims.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
The evidence is people crying and her videos spreading like a virus throughout the Internet. LOL
There is no deceiving, just your pressure for me to expose the core reasoning that I have no intention of doing it.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Bien fait Tubarc.
Merci
lifenw 2 years ago
Pas de quoi. Je suis enchante de faire cette choise . . . Elle es une chanteuse trés important pour tout le monde et toute personne qui veu plaisir avec la musique. . . au revoir .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Stop telling me to watch this poor quality video!
classickaitlyn 2 years ago
Sorry, I was just considering you an intelligent person who could understand it . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
Not a code, perhaps, but absolutely yes for the vocal pattern and the rising connected notes...if done correctly, you can make anyone cry...
neat food for thought
annmorrison 2 years ago
As CODE I meant as a set of principles or rules .. .to achieve a goal of making people get emotional and cry by sound patterns .
Yep, an outstanding food for though as the main explanation of Susan breakthrough . .
Decoding it is a challenge . .
Thanks for your attention
Tubarc 2 years ago
Just show publicly how you make anyone cry when experiencing your ISOLATED "sound code" produced by Susan...
That's the simplest way to prove your claim. Show us how "knowledgeable" you are, and how "ignorant" everyone else is... ;)
Come on pal, put your money where you mouth is...
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Hey kid, you are not smart are you?
When you become a knowledgeable person you learn a lot about the limits of your understanding . . .
Why is opera sang in Italian and not English?
BTW I would never state anything about someone else ignorance . . . My own business is how much I can learn and how to be sure about it . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
What's wrong with U man? You state -same paragraph- that I'm not smart, that I'm not "knowledgeable", and close it with this: "I would never state anything about someone else ignorance"
Are you on drugs or something?
I know more about the limitations of human understanding and perception/s than you would ever dream of, pal
Did U even heard me at the beginning a comment I made about quantum mechanics?
Furthermore, why you refuse to put your "secret code" to USE and show how knowledgeable U are?
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Are you sure you got anything on Quantum Mechanics?
I had to review a paper on Soil Aggregation and the technique is about how the soil behaves when dry. There are thousands of scientific papers about it.
The question is:
Which soil works without water?
None, and all those papers are useless . . .
When you break the atoms into smaller particles how do you know that those particles existed inside an intact atom?
Perhaps you are creating some particles when breaking the atom apart
Tubarc 2 years ago
Reasonable doubt is to Nature to judge and not humans on biased scientific communities that need to protect ongoing budgets . . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
We are the ONLY ones "judging". Nature do not judge, just = IS.
And we NEED to make judgments, we wouldn't have advanced the little that we did without it.
How would you study microorganisms without a microscope? Judgment had to be used in order to accomplish the creation of such a device. And we should be grateful for that.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Sorry can help you with that. Don't know. I know it can work with liquid all by itself. I mean I don't know, but saw a Jap scientist working on it and he says it was successful however I didn't keep track of it, but he had quite a plantation running on it, of all sort of fruits and veges much bigger than average.
Yeap, the atom is giving head aches even at this point in time.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Everything is being taken care of in the most appropriate way. I know how the system works and the outcome is very comfortable as my expectation is just reasonable.
Problems are created and solved and life goes on since the beginning when Carbon started being packed by photosynthetic processes. The climate was good at the time and no C was retained yet. Global warming is a huge flaw because people do not understand nature even less C cycle and glaciation eras.
Tubarc 2 years ago
Most people know by know, global warming is nothing but a scam designed for big companies to make money, and taking over people's freedoms WW.
As for the rest, I'm not very sure of what are you referring to, but it doesn't seem to be the subject of this video. In other words, your unfounded claim.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Code can be a set of principles or rules . . . people are crying watching the video and the sound pattern seems to be behind it . . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
And once again we can see how "accurate" "knowledgeable" and "professional" you are:
"the sound pattern seems to be behind it"
SEEMS TO BE? SEEMS TO BE?
EXCUSE ME; *SEEMS* TO BE?!
Is THAT ^^^ what you call "science" ?!
This is very simple: U make a claim, U can't prove it, even acknowledge it. Now even express it as "a possibility", yet keep portraying it as a "fact" = *LEARN* "why"...
If you R gonna keep deceiving people at least tell them the truth, instead of "learn why" = "BELIEVE" *me*
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Hey, you are selling yourself too cheap.
As matter of fact I already gave the CODE and you did not grab any tip about . .. LOL
Crying is a gland like the same in the prostate you use when cumming. They hold liquid substances to be released. Naturally the prostate need far more pressure to release millions of sperms to a fertile land.
If you know how to make you mind work on your prostate when can have the highest ejaculation ever for being able to build required pressure . ..
Tubarc 2 years ago
Lachrymal gland can respond to many mechanisms like sulphenic acid from onion which end up forming sufluric acid and irritation to the nerve ending stinging and provoking tears.
There is a market of around 85 bl in the US to any chemical that could help females get orgasm.
Tubarc 2 years ago
So are you implying that people cries because the "sound code" hits the lachrymal gland and that's what makes it to "produce the tears"...which makes people to "uncontrollably cry" just like the onion???
If so, like I told you a zillion times already, ISOLATE the "code", expose 1000 people to it, record it, post it so people can SEE, what you are talking about, instead of having to "BELIEVE" your unfounded claim.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Although I predict that U won't do it, otherwise U would have done it much earlier to start with.
In fact you would have done it BEFORE making the claim and posting it on line, IF you were a true scientist, that is...
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
It is easier confirming my ideas than global warming
Tubarc 2 years ago
So DO IT!
I'm waiting...
Also, if it is an *IDEA* of yours, WHY you present it as a "fact" stating:
"Susan Boyle Secret Weapon - a CODE"
And:
"Learn why Susan Boyle can touch your soul with hope and make you weep"
(¿?¿?¿?)
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
It doesn't matter "how" a glands operates. What matters is what triggers the procedure.
You claim that it's a "hidden sound code", and no, you haven't presented such a "sound code".
You are just beating around the bush, trying to distract the attention of the FACT that you can produce evidence of such a "code" because YOU HAVE NONE!
That's all there is. Don't know what you little "agenda" may be, but is quite obvious that you are up to deceiving people for whatever "reason".
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
How and what are overlaying.
You should be wiser. People cut onions and they cry as well as people watch Susan Boyle and cry.
You are naive.
Nobody can deceive nature. . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Any fluid in contact with a human body will cause a reaction of a sort, that's NOT a "mystery"
Anyone can grab an onion and personally experience it (Even though it isn't true 100% of the time, some people won't have such a reaction)
People could do the same with your "sound code" when you provide it.
Oh wait........ YOU DON'T HAVE ONE!
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
And your "convenient habit" of "ignoring" whatever comment exposing the fact that you have no proper qualifications on the field, doesn't go "unnoticed", just so you know...
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
I am curious what is the proper qualification to for this issue. I do have a strong foothold on biological sciences as well as remote sensing and GIS. LOL. Above all I am a scientist with good understanding on boundaries of knowledge . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
You tell me Mr "wise". You are pretending that Ur alleged "sound code" triggers "uncontrollable crying" just like onion does, disregarding completely all other ingredients present on the mix, including people's perceptions, processing of it, understanding, and analytical response to an incident full of emotions, pretending that people are just a "piece of meat with legs", or "animals" that have no control on their bodies, just because YOU "say so"
If you ARE a scientist, ACT as such!
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
thank you for the comment... i really enjoyed your video
ConstanceStone 2 years ago
You're welcome . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
That is definately the most times I've seen that clip of Susan Boyle in a row.
Kudos
EmmaMEBryce 2 years ago
Yep, sometimes comparative analysis is boring but going back to zero is important to tune our senses . . sorry ! ! !
Tubarc 2 years ago
blah blah blah BS. Trying to capitalize on this Boyle thing. Nice try opportunist.
eldrama1 2 years ago
Nah, just having fun with stupid people like you .. .LOL
watch this video below to know who I am . . .
135 Tubarc - War on Terror
I am opportunist because in 1984 I started doing jogging and six months afterward I completed a full marathon in 3h23min.
That hangup you see on the video I learned at college 30 years earlier . . .
Probably you are obese and/or have a very small brain inside your skull . . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
Interesting theory Tubarc. Honestly I didn't see that much difference - except maybe between those that were trained singers and those that were untrained. We'll easily see if it's something she is consciously doing or not the next time she performs.
SpontHumanProd 2 years ago
Well, our specific internal sensors require some sort of procedure to work out their goal like milking a caw or having an orgasm. Continuous stimulus under certain range of variation can achieve the final expected delivery . . . sound patterns does affect our sensory in the brain and release oxytocin. Jogging also release endorphins which provides a high mood and cozy feeling . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Our brain is our UNDER our control through the mind which is ALSO under our control. It doesn't act on its own.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
That is funny ! ! !
So, a person with headache if missing a switch to turn off the pain department . .. impressive ..
So, a person that is sad is because the entertainment dept. is no vacation . . .lol
Tubarc 2 years ago
The so called "Pros" haven't been able to PROVE those claims. Can you?
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
The 'pros' are not what you think junior . . .
Nature has been in charge deciding since the beginning who procreates and make up to the life cycle. Now, man with those 'pros' are putting everybody in production with many techniques like IVF.
Nature has a quality control system. Imagine if you go to any assembling production and let the flawed parts going to consumers.
Because of money as 'pros' we are messing with our essence pretending to understand what we are doing . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Obesity can be fixed in a couple of centuries as we see in front of our eyes the consequences of modern life.
But, the mess on our genetic composition may take longer to repair as we get along and learn more about nature . . .
I already told you that understanding and comprehension is the main core of science. . .
At least we are learning that developed countries do not know even how to handle money even less abundant food and plenty of machinery . . . Nature is sturdy and merciless . .LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
ORGANIC problems that develops on the body, have NOTHING to do with FEELINGS which belongs on the field of the mind. The fact that you see physical MANIFESTATION of it, doesn't mean the ORIGIN is "organic"
We are more than a piece of meat with legs, "senior" . Lighten up!
And take responsibility for your own actions, it didn't go "unnoticed" the fact that you "conveniently" ignored the fact that you are one of the deceivers, making claims for which you have no evidence to prove such claim.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Probably you never heard about endorphins, oxytocin, etc.
You are not smart . . . I have evidence .. I am not stupid to give it away so easily . . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
It doesn't matter what I heard or didn't heard. Or whether I'm "smart" or not. What matters is that YOU "claim" there's a "hidden code" that makes people cry, didn't present any evidence, yet present it as a "fact"
"Learn why/can touch your soul with hope and make you weep" "Susan Boyle Secret Weapon - a CODE".
You already acknowledge you have no evidence, now you CLAIM having it. And just as the previous CLAIM, is nothing but a fraud, coming from some1 who has no Idea about the human mind
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Sorry, but you got trapped by your own shallow understanding:
Code is a very complex word. DNA is a CODE that we understand nothing on the logical sequence. Life built a CODEt on the core of our existence but we have no idea how to assemble it simply because we do not understand much about handling matter at molecular level . . .
If you watch all my videos you may start figuring out the CODE . . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
So?!
Whether DNA is a code or not it makes no difference.
You claim is that "she with her 'code' makes people cry".
Even if you refer to dna, it does NOT change the fact that you are talking about something PHYSICAL, (Starting end) supposedly "affecting" something PHYSICAL (receiver end) that "causes" the incident to come to existence.
Just one little detail; THERE'S NO EVIDENCE OF SUCH! AKA = LIE!
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Electromagnetic radiation in the sound waves is quite a code and can even have an equation or a multivariate analysis . . . You are not expecting me to deliver it straight in your hands .. LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
Regardless. You are still dealing with PHYSICS, and that has no place on the mind.
And I don't need you to "deliver" anything.
All I'm telling you is to stop deceiving people by claiming they are gonna "learn" something, you can't prove. I already told you, at most you could get people to "believe" your claim. But they are not gonna learn anything from a baseless claim, for which you present no evidence whatsoever. Unless you are trying to create a "cult".
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
You are missing the point because the evidence is already on the table. Now we are just trying to match the underlying reasoning . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
There's NO EVIDENCE in any "table". Your "evidence" only exist on your mind, and NOWHERE ELSE!
Your statement itself reflects the fact that THERE'S NO EVIDENCE!
You portrait something as a "fact", and now you're gonna look for "the underlying reasoning"..? In other words = THE EVIDENCE TO PROVE IT!
Don't know where your knowledge of science comes from, but it works 180 degrees on the opposite direction, it seems that you missed class when they came to that part.
Ridiculous!
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
I wish you were a PhD I would save time and we could chat in the same level. This book may help you self-schooling:
George Gale, Theory of Science: An introduction to the History, Logic, and Philosophy of Science. McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Being honest with you most PhDs do not know much about Philosophy of Science and it gives them troubles to understand how science works in the underlying core.
Cheers!
Tubarc 2 years ago
Book are written by PEOPLE. As I already stated this event is a response of a perception processed and understood through thought process. No by an "uncontrollable" body part.
I know a guy in Cali, who writes recipe books. He takes recipes from magazines from all over the world and make it into a book. Does it means he's a "Pro", executive chief?! NO! In fact don't ask him to fry an egg b/c he has NO CLUE!
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Nature also does not write books . . .
You do not need to believe in gravity, but any time you misstep you can feel something happening as your hit the ground . .
Why to prove about gravity?
LOL, you can neglect gravity if you can afford the consequences . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Again = MEST. PHYSICAL UNIVERSE. HUMAN MIND. Relation = 0.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
This is ridiculous. You are actually acknowledging my statement, while calling me "junior".
It seems that you don't even understand what you say! LOL!!! XDDDD...
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Well, you are learning fast but there is a long way to get there . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
You don't even make sense. As for me "learning fast", you have no Idea who you are talking to pal.
Like I said, stop lying to people, because while you don't present EVIDENCE of your claim, that's all that is; rubbish. And the ONLY thing you could accomplish with it is to DECEIVE whoever buy that nonsense.
Then YOU "incriminate" main stream science, for being "deceitful". Well guess what?!
YOU ARE FIRST ON LINE!
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
I was able to teach my dog a carnivore to eat fruits:
111 Tubarc - My Dog Loves Fruit
I am assuming that you can learn faster since you are a human.
The game of playing nature is just a question of finding more coherence since there is no Court to judge . . . Nature does not care about our interpretation . . . being loyal is just a question of perfection . . .
There is no crime in science . . . but things that match and make sense . . . There is no authority to judge science . . just nature !!!!
Tubarc 2 years ago
There are crimes committed by SOME scientists. Not by "science".
No one said that "nature cares or not" about our interpretation, so that's irrelevant.
Dogs and humans are two very different living organisms, and that's despite of what "fellow Jung & partners" CLAIM about it without EVIDENCE TO PROVE IT! just like...hmmm...who could it be... oh! yest YOU!
One acts under reaction patterns, the other has A MIND to analyze, evaluate, & understand info.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Believe me, humans are not as intelligent as they claim . . .failing on many basic care of their existence . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
No one says they are. Yet it doesn't mean they are "the same as animals"
If you don't think so, try to get your dog to do your taxes, and who knows, with a bit of good luck maybe you get it...
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Yeah, you did not get the point on developing healthy habits . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
It makes no difference. U can eat whatever you want, it will not affect ONE BIT, the way thought processes take place, b/c it occurs on the mind and that's not a physical part of the body. So whatever involves Mest, plays no part in it at all. And there's where your possible knowledge about physics and the field of the mind departs from one other. That is also where you enter a field for which you have no knowledge whatsoever, and all of your assertions prove it far beyond any reasonable doubt
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Now I have to agree with your statement . .
'it occurs on the mind and that's not a physical part of the body"
So, it explains why people can lose their minds . . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
Another childish response coming from a supposed "PhD". You know? I thought it was a "cultural" difference, but now I'm starting to doubt whether you have a PhD for real.
People don't say: "I'm" or "I have, a PhD", in fact I never heard anyone expressing it like that anywhere, including foreigners. Everybody states in which field they have a PhD.
Having a PhD in one field doesn't make you "an expert" on the rest of the fields. In fact you could be completely ignorant. It seems U don't know that
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
When any person claim to be a PhD I just peek at their waistline to see how much of that accumulated knowledge is used on their own good.
They are supposed to be healthier than laypeople devoid of educational background. People who are revealing nature secrets are supposed to keep their lives in balance with their existence. . .
Diplomas is more for money making and not improving their lifestyles . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Having a PhD on computer science would doubtfully give you any knowledge on nutrition, and viceversa.
So...sorry, try again.
And -again- a PhD in one field doesn't give you automatically "universal knowledge".
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Dr. Silva, you are on to something here!!!!
penelope0427 2 years ago
Indeed it seems that Susan found a sound pattern more appropriate to make our brain release oxytocin squeezing our lachrymal glands by combining natural talent with IT technology for a legendary breakthrough. Her sound signature is quite unique with many insights to allow important advancement toward mind control. She does not know why she is doing it but the phenomenon has many plausible answers for discussion.
Tubarc 2 years ago
You just discovered the boiled water
jglenalv 2 years ago
Yep, I discovered a boiled water hot enough to heat the global community with more than 300 hits on internet. You can can it green weepy energy . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
This was an outstanding production. So much research and thinking. it's awesome, but then too few viewers have the ability to see what you're saying is true! :D But you are right on!!! :P
x
kroneage 2 years ago
Yep, most viewers are just curious laypeople. But Susan trespassed new boundaries never set foot before. She has the gift which she is also impressed with the outcome . . . Sound patterns has the key to our emotions and this is the CODE she delivered . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Again, there's no evidence of such, just your assumption.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
There is no evidence about the 'Big Bang' because it was not recorded and cannot be duplicated with certainty that it can portray the real one, if there was one . .. ? ? ?
To pack some voice patterns and test their power on human feelings and emotions is a quite easy task. . .
Science has lots of distortions and manipulation like in the music industry because they need to protect budgets and keep society believing they are doing their job . . . . LOL
Tubarc 2 years ago
"Science has lots of distortions and manipulation"
Correction: Certain "Scientists" distort and/or manipulate information and deceive the public with CLAIMS for which they have NO EVIDENCE to PROVE it!
And that's REGARDLESS of the reasons "why" they bring about such a deception.
That's the very reason why I suggested you to be honest and make clear to the public that your claim is indeed a theory of yours, which needs to be investigated and you already acknowledge it, yet didn't correct it.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
Tubarc 2 years ago
Science is distorted just because nature is careless about MONEY making...
The sun is always shining in the horizon with no concern with Wall Street mood . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Right. But Science is not distorted by itself. PEOPLE distort it -like I already said- REGARDLESS of the reason "why"
And WHILE you have NO EVIDENCE to show for, to back up your claim, you are amongst those who perpetrate the distortion. Simple as that.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
This is nothing but a justification. With that "logic", you could claim that you "know" everything there's to know. Childish, and absolutely unscientific.
Gmmaverick 2 years ago
I am just another one mingling with so many commoners.
I called 'Tubarc" standing for tube + arc as a new conceptions in hydrodynamics for an advanced porosity geometry. It updates 'capillarity' standing on dictionaries for near half a millennium. It borrows insights from the beginning of life when unicellular organisms started to pack and grow to larger ones and needed a biological porosity for fluid dynamics.
I'm another mortal not caring for names but improved etymology . . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
Yes, you are on to something!!!!!!!!!!!
shootforthecut 2 years ago
Indeed there is an interesting phenomenon to go after and break it down . . . Hey, thanks for watching and commenting. . .
Tubarc 2 years ago
lol everything
Piper8121 2 years ago