U.S. foreign policy and the race for President (3 of 3)

[MyPileOfDigitalMedia]

Why again people like Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul have no chance to win according to the Analysis, mmm ... no reasonable explanation their. Please be fair, we are the voters not the media, by the way I think John Edwards and Bill Richardson are just a regular politicians, further, Joe Biden is just a jerk. On the on the other hand DK and RP are above average politicians, the way should be for our representatives. Thank you for reading.

[Polytical]

Again, he has just a little media coverage. Media aren't the voters, but neither are you the majority voter. That's why we call 'em "mass media" - the mass of the people listens to them.

I'm a Czech and I hope RP wins, but in realistic predictions you can't rely on simple hope. Be prepared for the worst, as the worst is usually what happens.

[tanith33]

I think it's a mistake to allow interviewees to steer the interview in that they focus solely on the "lead" candidates. As long as the news media keeps that up, no one will know what's vote-worthy about the other candidates.

[Horseface18]

I see how you justified not commenting on people who are likely not going to win the race but how can you not comment on Obama who does have a real shot at winning and has a completely different mindset to Americas foreign policy?

[obidobi2]

You need some common denominator in the headline when you make multipart videos, when each video have a diffrent title. Or make sure to make next part a responce to the previous part.

Thnx

[TheRealNews]

Fair comment. I had noticed that too. I will let the newsroom know for future videos.

Cheers

[obidobi2]

Where is part 1 and 2?

[stratvic]

If you are the "real news" then ron paul should have had more coverage than just his name. He is the exception to what you were talking about. I watch you guys because I know the main stream entertainment news is no longer impartial. I want a source of real news.

[Amalgamutt]

It's obvious by reading the comments here, that none of you have any working knowledge of geopolitics, what-so-ever, so do everyone a favor and keep quiet...you only show your ignorance and how you're lead by emotion instead of logic.

[ddnn2000]

Just about all democrats working for companies, not Americans!

[angelsoulnme]

Why did the interviewer SHUT DOWN THE ANALYST when he mentioned RON PAUL????? I am UNSUBSCRIBING now. If you are the REAL NEWS than why ARENT YOU REPORTING ON IT!!

[Wildeparker]

He didn't shut down anything. He just went on with the interview. It's clear from the timing that he didn't mean to interrupt at all.

I read angelsoulnme's retarded comment first before watching this and all I can say is "me thinks a wolf in sheep's clothing pretends to watch Real News in the first place."

You'd be more subtle with bumper sticker. Try again.

[infundadiform]

these news programs propagate the idea no one else can win fuck the journalist.they need to report the news and take option out of it.this is our gov. they work for us we need to take a stand. we need to stop paying taxes and force to gov. to do the peoples bidding .they are out of control.

[Brawk]

but I guess the mention of Ron Paul deserves an edit!

[Brawk]

America's "bull in a china shop policy"... perfect!!!

[theoshow2]

The Real News is "Propaganda Lite".

[MiriadX]

Why the interruption when he mentioned Ron Paul's name?

[sloprogressive]

I have been wondering what the neocons' plan was for the 2008 election, other than election fraud. But, perhaps their plan is becoming clear. I have not committed myself to any candidate but it now seems that we must back those who are not Bush clones.

[burningice17]

How could you leave out Gravel? Did you forget he was running? Don't you become part of the problem too by leaving out candidates just because they have less money or poll points. Are you going to leave out Nader if he runs? Maybe you should do a story on the unfair laws against third party candidates, too.

[oldhacks]

100,000 people is only .3 percent of the population. I figure the percentage of the population controlling the brainwashing election fraud today is probably around .001 percent of the population. Its the publics fault. We want to not care and not vote so we dont have to take responsibility for their odious actions

[oldhacks]

right now if 100,000 Americans gave a hundred dollars to Gravel he'd have 10 million. The illusion that he can't win is just that. If it were not for the insane amount of censorship he has fallen prey to then more Americans would see that he is this Era's ROOSEVELT

[oldhacks]

Chuck Todd saw how much Gravel had and came up with a number just over the top of what he has to censor him from the debate on the 30th. its a disgusting act. Its all part of how Hillary is an Agent of Big business. Big Business communism. Where there is no middle class. And we have phoney elections to fool everyone into thinking they have a democracy. Its a dictatorship. the only way you can free yourself is by becoming a law maker WITH your elected officials.

ni4d dot us

[oldhacks]

what the hell real news. I'm out here on the streets giving my life for Gravel and you guys are leaving him out of every piece that relates to him. god damn it. wtf?

watch?v=H5YeZ_85uBI

[Brawk]

Gravel, Kucinich and Ron Paul are the only non CFR members running for president, yet they always seem to get lost in the shuffle. Guess it depends who is doing the shuffling.

[oldhacks]

All those good government jobs out there building bombs. Thats who runs us. the machines.

[mangasmommy]

Just excellent! As always.

[2t3m]

It's very disturbing to realize that the crackpots are not in Irak, but in the White House & that any of the future president (Clinton or Rudy Giuliani) are just thinking the same way Bush & Cheney are. Are we stock with that problem till 2012? Where are we going? How many soldier and civilian have to be killed before people understand that the White House is out of control?

[mrmike123456a]

I wish It were possible to give you 10 stars for this report! 5 stars just does not express how accurate and rational your assessment is!