More difficult engine maintenance, less engine choices by fixed diameter inlet, more potential for turbulence due to larger wings, stealth design enhancing collision risk in civilian traffic, absurdally long and expensive certification process and tickets due to completely non-standard layout, engine fire potentially hazardous to wing structure, lower wing elongation decreases performance, cabin without windows.
I think if the engines are embedded in the wing and the exhaust is traveling over the top it makes for a quieter plane. Also making an emergency belly landing on land or water would not be as dangerous, the engines wouldn't catch water and tear the wings off and flip the plane over, not unlike that Airbus that ditched off the beach in Mauritius years ago killing nearly everyone on board. This thing would just skim along, it would almost be fun...
soo many unusual aircrafts were made and Flown, why the hell wait 2025 for that???? they got the design, how it functions and etc! or the oil companies has got to them?...
Aviation authorities constantly develop new requirements as technology advances. If an equivalent level of safety can be reached on an aircraft that is superior in every way (for example other forms of evacuation by means of top and/or bottom emergency exits), then authorities will find ways to accommodate such a design of course! :]
More difficult engine maintenance, less engine choices by fixed diameter inlet, more potential for turbulence due to larger wings, stealth design enhancing collision risk in civilian traffic, absurdally long and expensive certification process and tickets due to completely non-standard layout, engine fire potentially hazardous to wing structure, lower wing elongation decreases performance, cabin without windows.
krbosak 2 months ago
wher are the windows?
rubikfan1 3 months ago
I think if the engines are embedded in the wing and the exhaust is traveling over the top it makes for a quieter plane. Also making an emergency belly landing on land or water would not be as dangerous, the engines wouldn't catch water and tear the wings off and flip the plane over, not unlike that Airbus that ditched off the beach in Mauritius years ago killing nearly everyone on board. This thing would just skim along, it would almost be fun...
Veldtian1 3 months ago
Blonde on the phone: "I'll be at your place in half an hour Jose. Don't worry my husband will never find out.
banacek8675 4 months ago
wow this is so cool
andina18 7 months ago
It appears to be a giant YF 23.
Maybe the both engines should stay bellow the wings by a "S" structure of propulsion like the central engine of the Boeing 727.
rdsbarros 8 months ago
@rdsbarros Maybe you let engineers, who know aerodynamics and have a degree, to make this aircraft better, not kool lookin'.
1SFODdelta 7 months ago 4
Comment removed
rdsbarros 7 months ago
@1SFODdelta Maybe you shut up. I didn't ask for your opinion.
rdsbarros 7 months ago
@rdsbarros You shut up, mister brazil.
1SFODdelta 7 months ago
@rdsbarros It's done on purpose, to lower the noise 0:15
TheLK42 7 months ago
This will NEVER fly! the engines should NOT be embedded into the wings big safety No no.
CreoleCommando 1 year ago
@CreoleCommando
Just because the Comet was a disaster, doesn't mean this will be.
kurtu5 1 year ago
Comment removed
leicam6 1 year ago 2
the 737 preplacement lol:
1whiteiphone 1 year ago
Isn't it stalling at 1:14?
happyapple96 1 year ago
soo many unusual aircrafts were made and Flown, why the hell wait 2025 for that???? they got the design, how it functions and etc! or the oil companies has got to them?...
Attilaakiraly 1 year ago
A future plane with no windows?
G777GUN 2 years ago
Very cool but no rear emergency exits?
76TomD 2 years ago
@76TomD
Aviation authorities constantly develop new requirements as technology advances. If an equivalent level of safety can be reached on an aircraft that is superior in every way (for example other forms of evacuation by means of top and/or bottom emergency exits), then authorities will find ways to accommodate such a design of course! :]
Croopskate 1 year ago
Hurry up, we could use quieter planes. But make sure all airports have GPS beacons for increased accuracy and when solar flares act up.
masimons 2 years ago
wow
consoleman09 2 years ago
jeeze, could they fit more buzzwords into that?
they also seem to be confusing the benefits of modernizing routing systems with the benefits of a "CESTOL" airframe, which they don't discuss at all.
DannyZRC 2 years ago
neat
Chopin742 2 years ago
@Chopin742 Naive design as hell. Not even original.
krbosak 2 months ago