@BigJim117 The guy who shot Congresswoman Giffords was ill, wasn't on some mission to attack her (she happened to be at the scene), and was left-wing (by the literature found at his dwelling). Please try not to create false associations. Also, crazed madmen are not typically labeled terrorists.
@dbirchle At least, they aren't labeled terrorists because they are crazed; the label is given based on intent and method. Method, I'll give you, but intent to terrify and oppress by going off the handle and killing random people? Please.
@dbirchle Actually according to his friends, Jared Lee Loughner had disliked Giffords for a long time & kept a form letter that thanked him for attending a 2007 event in an envelope scrawled with "Die bitch" and "Assasination Plans have been made."
The GOP will not raise taxes on the wealthy Americans. IF tax cuts created jobs, we should all be employed, making 50k a yr..right? LOL. Wat a crock of shit the REPUKES feed the ppl. Their first duty is to country, NOT a fucking tax pledge meant to make the rich RICHER. END BUSH TAX CUTS...YESTRDAY!!!
I agree that Obama is a shitty, Do-nothing president. But this guys arguments are nonsensical paranoid delusions. all that does is make your point of view less credible. as a conservative, i would appreciate legitimate arguments that don't make my positions look like childish name calling.
@straightfacedfsu Wat would you call Congress? You GOPPERS obstruct, filibuster, and generally have been screwin the American ppl. You don't even have an argument.
@AzazelsRevenge you're not even addressing what I was arguing. read what i wrote before you get angry. I'm arguing AGAINST the conservative nonsensical propaganda here. And besides that, the current GOP is NOT conservative in my opinion. they are neocons, and that is VERY different. when i refer to myself as conservative, I mean Teddy Roosevelt conservative, not Goldwater/Nixon/Reagan neoconservative wacko. Those guys are radicals, not conservatives. please read more carefully
@FrankDaTank1218 Reagan is NOT an extremist in terms of today's GOP. But relative to traditional conservatives such as Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, etc, his ideology is very different. my point is there's a difference between conservatives and neoconservatives. Reagan was a neocon, not a traditional conservative. Try and work on your reading comprehension skills.
@straightfacedfsu Dude, the Teddy R party is gone. Do you think he would approve of wats going on in the GOP today? The neo=cons have killed the USA. I will read more carefully, and good luck. The pols today are bought and paid for.
@AzazelsRevenge i absolutely agree. i think the real problem is the politicians are now influenced by corporations who can anonymously donate as much as they want. Corporations have the same "rights" as individual citizens? give me a break. talk about the end of anything resembling a functional republic. unless you consider the corporations to be the real representatives. which i guess they are now. im moving to Denmark...
it's clear that he doesn't know what the word, extremist is or that they, right-wing extremists are willing to kill for their beliefs, even though they won't test their beliefs to make sure they're right and doesn't care that other people doesn't care in their beliefs at all.
just like people who killed abortionists because they claimed that their bible, gives them the right to do it...but the bible supports abortion, genocide, infanticide, murder and slavery.
Democrats Republicans, just different sides of the same coin and sadly both are equally ineffective.
Our elected officals, just pigs feeding at the trough, no longer governing just fighting over turf while our country falters. Just like before, clearly taxation without representation.
Divided we kneel, but UNITED WE STAND 1776 was when the first shot was fired
but 1775 is when the first militias started forming.
@unitedwestand1775 Don't stand on the left or the right, if you do you obviously are telling everyone you prefer to be a country divided. Stand in the middle where in counts, independent! Take the best of both parties and make America what it needs to be.
@IceBlood888 "Take the best of both parties and make America what it needs to be." - Not america? (Not American because large government will never be american) - "Stand in the middle where in counts, independent!" - We were born with a small government, lets keep it that way.
For the Record): Berhard Von Nothause was sentenced to prison for over 20 years ,he was covicted as a terrorist because he made silver coins that had the word DOLLAR on it.He did not commit a violent action ,not one
This is the Progressives' definition of a terrorist: a GOP voter. We Republicans scare Democrats. Leftists have nightmares about conservative governance. They fear we'll outlaw tofu and force vegetarians to eat Porterhouse steaks broiled rare. They fear we'll do something unspeakably reactionary, such as defining the USA as the homeland of the American citizenry. What scares Lib Dems the most is that prosperity and self-reliance may replace govt dependence and freeloading off the public trough.
>>This is the Progressives' definition of a terrorist: a GOP voter.
No. A right-wing terrorist would be the following:
The anti-tax crowd who resort to violence and raise militias to overthrow the Fed. A great example was a man who crashed his plane into a government office.
The pro-lifers who KILL doctors and vandalize clinics.
Christians who kill/threaten/use violence against homosexuals and atheists.
We must not ignore this problem, it is real, and it threatens our society.
Orwell was a Democratic Socialist. He opposed Authoritarianism. You also miss the mark in that we are a collectivist species. Only the last several thousand years have we started to ignore that aspect of ourselves as we fashioned societies.
You also didn't address what I said: we need to oppose violent right-wing extremists for societal health.
@viriatoist Well I'm pretty much afraid that, conservatives will roll the dice back to the early 1900's in where people like Boss Tweed are abusing the political process. There is no minimum wage or age limit, workers can't unionize or go on strike. And the middle class goes extinct, and where infectious diseases roam the slums becuase people can't afford adequate health care, not mention the destruction of the public school system. Well at least the rich by that point won't be paying any taxes.
If you examine the numbers, the middle class is slightly growing, at the expense of the working class. The wealthy have been slowly getting richer over the last decades, while the working class has had less and less wealth at its disposal. This started after the 80s.
We are in serious need of a complete regulatory overhaul of business. Healthcare should be socialized, and the wealthy should be taxed 80% like they were decades ago.
>>geniuses can simply refuse to innovate and produce
Fine. Others will fill their shoes. There are millions of geniuses out there, and most of us have different views on humanity and society.
>>limits on success
Qualify it: Limits means you cannot dump poison into rivers. You cannot employ children. You cannot falsely label products. See the pattern? Limits mean ways to keep society healthy. Taxes used to be really high for the rich, and jobs didn't suffer. Look at the numbers.
You assume that selfishness and greed lead to excellence. They do not.
>>typical of a Democratic American
Across Europe, with its very liberal populations, they are enjoying comfort and prosperity. They are positively perplexed at our fixation on ignoring the needs of the poor and weak. We have a dysfunctional culture at the moment, it is controlled by a wealthy few.
@viriatoist That's surprising considering under President Eisenhower, the tax rate for the rich was 90%. Also I don't understand why you conservatives don't want the rich to pay their share of taxes, and want to leave the poor high and dry. Since you don't think the rich deserve to or can't pay their taxes. And cutting programs for the poor pretty much prevents anyone from the lower tax bracket from moving on up. Or just staying up.
>>Only masochists want to be cash cows of parasitical govt.
It is a social responsibility. Accumulated wealth just leads to irresponsible power and political meddling. It should go to the public good. Wealthy people can afford high taxes, because what's left over for them still allows them to enjoy a luxurious lifestyle, it just weakens their ability to cause social damage.
>>don't tax winners to subsidize losers
If you don't like it live in an anarchy. Society requires compromise.
>>what constitutes responsible behavior for able-bodied intelligent adults
Depends on the type of government, and its division of power. If you don't like it, you can always move to another state. Most of us would rather have a fair society, rather than one which has an ideological axe to grind.
>>Obama and Bill Gates
That's easy. Neither are geniuses, but Obama was more capable than Gates. Gates dropped out, and through sheer luck happened upon a burgeoning market.
No, they are not. They have better intelligence but are not superior people. That is because intelligence, strength, wealth, charisma etc. are all qualities that distinguish us but none of them are better than the other objectively. It comes down to preference.
>>America's culture is entirely owed to capitalists
You need to retake history, with attention to the enlightenment.
>>a self-made billionaire has nothing to do with luck
Firstly, no one is self-made. Your parents made you, so did your environment, teachers, and friends. Secondly, it is all about luck. Luck of the traits you were born with, luck of having a moment of inspiration, luck of having the financial resources and social connections. The luck that you hit a market at the right time, and have the perfect product. The luck that your competitors fail to put you out of business while small.
@kDest You envious types should see your statist utopia (republic of herd mentality) realized. The entrepreneurial elite who innovate and create businesses will not cooperate and will respond by dissolving and liquidating their businesses. The resulting economic and brain drain will bankrupt your utopia. Doesn't the failure of North Korean and Cuban communism teach you anything? Doesn't the success of capitalist Switzerland and Hong Kong teach you anything? Mediocrities don't generate progress.
>>Roman Catholic, I don't exactly hold truck with Ayn Rand
You assimilated her objectivist dogma through third party sources. I know one thing: Jesus was a communist, and he would be very cross with you for looking down on your brothers.
You really cannot call yourself a Christian while envying the rich, and defending them. Jesus was very clear about the wealthy: they are hellbound. His teachings make it clear that you must live in voluntary poverty.
So rich you have to spend time defending yourself to someone who doesn't care. You're a very insecure person.
>>I've never been poor
What business then do you have talking about matters of life and death when you know nothing personal about them? It's sad when people blunder about talking about things of which they know nothing.
>>America's disintegrative flaw is its mongrel societal model
>>And I certainly do not subconsciously assimilate stimuli.
You are supposedly a Roman Catholic but you subscribe to key points of objectivism. Either you've absorbed the rantings of Rand, or you're just a big hypocrite.
>>As a rather successful alumnus
You can't be very successful if you're busy proving your worth to some bloke on the internet. That is the stink of insecurity.
>>You remind me of Trotskyists
I don't really care. I am not relevant to the discussion.
Not every genius is a selfish prick. Not every inventor cares only about #1. I say, bankrupt them and force them out of society. Then moral innovators can take their place and we can have a working society.
>>North Korean and Cuban communism
You mean totalitarianism and authoritarianism that is simply a different shade of your pro-aristocratic propaganda? Egalitarianism is the way, not castes, not corporate fascism, and not aristocracy.
You mean socialist Switzerland. They support universal healthcare and compulsory coverage.
>>Hong Kong
You are now championing the merits of free government-provided healthcare, public schools, and government subsidized housing.
>>Mediocrities don't generate progress
Without the "mediocre" as you call them, there is no society for the advantaged to work with. There is no food, no water, no medicine. The "mediocre" toil every day to give you infrastructure.
>>Technology has rendered mediocrities superfluous
And yet you're still here.
>>you've obviously never been to Hong Kong or to Switzerland
Says the man who did not know about their socialist programs.
>>is the key to the success of these rich communities
I'm more concerned about the success of the people, not a greedy and selfish minority whose existence is owed to their leeching from the fruits of other people's labor.
Billions of people work hard, but only a thousand achieve great success due to sheer luck of opportunity. But keep believing in the American dream, it's extremely profitable for businesses that you maintain faith.
>>Losers have always been and will always be irrelevant nonentities
It's interesting how you write yourself off that way. Your dogma expects you to believe that you are part of the enlightened, when you are the losers written about.
>>The problem with those who preach empathy is that they want to exercise it at someone else's expense and recur to coercion to make it compulsory.
Do you live in a society? How big is it? Hundreds of millions. You cannot humanly feel empathy for each and every individual, so we make laws which restrain your actions so that they are more empathetic for the people you never see or hear about. If we were a tribe of 30 people, these laws would be redundant.
He passed healthcare reforms, improved our image in the Middle East with diplomacy, assassinated Bin Laden (something that Bush couldn't do in 7 years), repealed the DADT law, and kept us out of a 1930s-style depression. I'd say he did very well for the first 2 years.
>>Socialism failed
Europe is quite happy with it.
>>societies equally miserable
Not really. It turns out when you regulate business and tax the rich, everyone else can breathe easier.
@viriatoist Actually lefties have nightmares about authoritarian governance, I actually would like to see conservative governance it would be a huge improvement. What really scares me as a liberal is that Republicrats ill again suspend heabeus corpus & in order to defend freedom lock thousands of innocent people up.
speaking of terrified you are terrified only for one reason Obama has dark skin and you and kkk white and your white supremist buddies are fit to be tied,if there is a god I hope there is a republican that is black run for president you people would go batchit insane.
@SbaDefender well i hope He gets elected in fact i would vote for him 10000 times if i could these white supremest would climb the freakin walls i think i would even take money out of my 401k to get him elected,,just to see people like Malotov squeel and complain ,and i am a white man :)
@johndebbra I hope you don't actually mean that. Voting for a man because of skin color is a horrific choice. As for myself, I am rooting for Ron Paul, a Constitutionalist, and a TRUE liberal. He is running as a republican and picking up a lot of traction; and by no means is he a white supremacist.
@SbaDefender i was not serious however to be honest anyone that votes i think should look at both sides if a democrat sees a republican they think is better vote that way if republican sees a democrat vote for them most people have no idea who they are voting for if they are Republican they will vote republican even if the guy was Hitler if they are Democratic they will vote for a democratic even if the person was Stalin..please realize Hitler and Stalin purely example.
@johndebbra Thanks for clearing up that last part. I was about to be pissed that you made Stalin Democrat instead of Republican. All Hail Stalin...=) I completely agree that voting based only on political party is. As for this guy, I disagree with most of what he says, however I still support his right to say it. If it's not too intrusive, may I ask who you like the most, thus far for president? If you've followed along enough to be comfortable with a decision.
>>I am rooting for Ron Paul, a Constitutionalist, and a TRUE liberal.
Ron Paul is anything but Liberal. He supports segregation, and an employer's "right" to fire you or refuse to hire you because you're not a white man. He believes the same for the disabled too, that employers should be able to refuse service or accommodations to them.
That's the exact opposite of liberalism, which believes that we should all be treated equally, and have equal opportunity.
>>He is running as a republican and picking up a lot of traction; and by no means is he a white supremacist.
That's the great little irony of it all. He most certainly isn't a white supremacist... he just believes that if a business owner tells you "No spooks allowed" or places "Whites Only" signs... well, it sucks to be you then because he will stand up for that poor, innocent businessman's right to discriminate, in the face of "evil" government "oppression" (equality).
So you're saying the right wing isn't extreme - then you're asking for armed revolution. Are you going to do a video on hypocrisy next? Or are we to believe that all of your videos cover that topic in depth merely by example?
Terrorism to one person is patriotism to another. Tyranny to one is also progress to another. What do you consider tyranny? Do you consider the Vietnam War tyranny, or do you consider universal healthcare tyranny?
There's a big difference between abortion and the death penalty. Killing a fetus, ends takes away their future. Killing a murderer or rapist accomplishes the same thing, however a fetus never took away the lives of others or destroyed their future like criminals do. A fetus is innocent. Abortion= punishing someone else for your actions. Death penalty=punishing a criminal for their actions.
Again, Embarrassing! What the hell is this? It's not even an argument. And a threat at the end? I am not really sure. A video that is a BIG MESS. I like the Obama is terrified. I seen a short list of what the Republicans are sending to Iowa and NO THREAT THERE. Brings up an actual subject, the Debt and then talks about guns? If this is the level or forming an argument in the modern day, this country is doomed.
@wigon by even responding to you, i know i am pleasuring you with a reaction. i will not, however, give you the pleasure of an angry, bitter response.
to assume that because someone advocates against xenophobia because they themselves are the target of xenophobia (or in this case, islamophobia) is your first wrong assumption friend. in reality, i am a poor college student with no particular religious faith. in fact, i know more about Christianity than i do about Islam.
@stopislamophobia Um... I wasn't planning on writing a bitter response. Guess what...I'm also not Muslim. lol! Like you I don't follow any organized religion, however I do study Islamic theology as a cultural anthropologist doing research in alternative methods of counter-terrorism. As such I spend alot of time around Muslims so I'm used to calling them "brother" as they call me that even though I'm not Muslim.
@wigon ah - my apologies. you see, i'm over-defensive on youtube. usually when someone uses a Islamic term in a sentence to me, it's used sarcastically.
alternative methods to counter-terrorism using cultural anthropology - by chance, is this sponsored by the military? either way, any alternative to using violence to fight an ideology fueled by violent acts done against them i profoundly support. keep it up brother.
@stopislamophobia I was setting up to go to Afghanistan with the State Dept. but family illness prevented from gong so I'm stuck here and right now everything I do is out of my own pocket. So nope, no government funding. I also have some issues with the Human Terrain Systems program. Basically I study islamic theology in order to develop Islamic based counter-propaganda to refute Wahabi/Salafi/Deobandi extremist theology. That book is by Greg Mortenson right? I've read 3 Cups of Tea. Great book
@wigon ah, well i hope you're able to make ends meet. i was just asking if it was related to the military because many of the officers have to take some anthro classes and do some Islamic theology studying.
yes, the Human Terrain Systems program doesn't seem like an effective method and it betrays those we are trying to stop demonizing us. yes, 3 cups of tea. education as a possible counter to extremist Islam. it's possible, as long as the teachers are locals and teach their own culture.
@stopislamophobia Yeah I think that Greg Mortensen pretty much has it correct. I see him as a REAL American hero and the fact that he is still alive is in large part a testimony to the respect he has from powerful tribal leaders in the Pashtun regions and other regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Alot of American officers also agree that killing the Taliban is not the ultimate answer, but rather instead developing Islamic based dialog with them and gradual change that is culturaly relevant.
@stopislamophobia I think that "progress" has a very different meaning to people in different parts of the world, but that sadly our single-minded vision of progress has often been adopted by many nations with catastrophic effects to culture and environment. Globalization of markets has been one primary driving force in this & it's not coincidental that globalization & Western hegemony of global economics is one of the chief topics commonly preached against by Imams all over the Islamic world
@stopislamophobia yes, i agree. thank you for your input. our comments are getting deleted and removed by the user (or by someone), but i can still see them.
Last clarification (for those who would point out these facts to dispute my real message): I know have been more than 31 presidents, I counted only true Republicans and true Democrats ignoring Federalists, Democratic National Unionists, Whig, Democratic-Republicans, etc.
I think he really made his point at the end (with the 1776 bit) that most of America is as knowledgeable about science and mathematics as Isaac Newton was about the modern computer, utterly clueless. And so, as most of America is clueless about science, they place their decisions in faith, over hard, unadorned facts. Now here comes the scary part, most American's, TRADITIONALLY (that is not regarding the most recent elections) are Republican and christian. (17 presidents Rep. 14 Dem.)
As a clarification, I said FAIL at the end of my last post because Palin is as ignorant as you can get. She truly believes that the earth is 6000 years old, even though the scientific community is 99.8% sure that it is billions of years old, she can't even give an intelligent response to Couric in her interview, and she can't make a speech to save her life. Really Republican Party? Really McCain?
The reason why people are buying guns is because they are arrogant, ignorant, and idiotic. They (as in the Republican aligned) are afraid a CHRISTIAN president (thats right, Obama is not muslim but christian) will hand the country over on a silver plater to the terrorists. Don't you think that before being nominated to show the face of a party they do background checks on these Senators? I guess not if you are in the Republican party as they voted for McCain and he chose Palin as his vp. FAIL!
From what I gathered from this video is a ton of historical information taken out of context, the use of the extremely inaccurate right/left grid nonsense, and throwing out random buzz words like socialist, Nazi, terrorist, etc. Then ends the video with a pseudo threat to the president.
I guess its to much to ask for people to be intellectually honest. Oh well, whatever gets him views I guess.
Yes, lets see the churches come up with billions of dollars needed for healthcare for the poor. Lets see the big mega-churches full of hypocrits like you Mr. "WeVoteRight" take over all the charities. They won't because they think like you instead of following what Jesus Christ actually taught about wealth and about helping the poor.
@wigon You're such a moron. Get the greedy federal government's hands out of people's pocket and you'll see what mega churches and charities can do. You just want to protect laziness because you're probably some deadbeat living off the government dime like most progressives.
I already proved you are a liar...no need to go on. Anyone willing to read all your crap can judge for themselves and come to the same conclusion if they have two brain cells.
I just did... but ok again calling you out on your lies: "Please show me a single nation that has no social programs and where everyone is rich because they work hard. Please....I beg you to show me where your ideology has worked in real life. You act like all poor people are lazy and don't work. In essence you act like a uncaring and arrogant atheist elitist who believes he's better then everyone who makes less money then he is and who spits upon anyone who DARES ask for help from him."
@wigon Look at this country the first 150 years before the rise of your religion, progressivism. There was no safety net and we did just fine. Lies, lies, lies, I have never said that. I don't see subsidizing laziness as a good thing and I think it creates a moral hazard. I think people and churches can do a better job helping the poor get back onto their feet than a welfare check.
You know, right wing extremists include people like...the westboro baptist church, bin laden, 9/11 hijackers, many latino dictators from the far right (not talking about Fidel Castro, he s from the left.) Bush, who started a war for absolutely nothing,and also the famous inspid,child raping Pope.Awesome company you got there.
Anyone can read the original memo which is dead-on accurate about right wing extremist militias who constantly threaten to use violence against the government. Mike also doesn't mention that the DoD defines anti-war protesters (liberals) as low-level terrorists. This is being faught by the ACLU. Mike goes on here to threaten violence again against the Obama administration at the end of this video...and then wonders why him and his kooks are called terrorists by the FBI. What a complete moron.
Props to you for speaking your mind. You're probably on a watch-list already. Soon you'll be classified as a hate monger and have your speech outlawed under hate speech regulations.
@wigon I'm glad a Leftist will concede hatred for freedom. Your totalitarian fruits already showed their colors with your fellow socialists (Nazis were a socialist party). The Constitution guarantees free speech against the gov. Nice to see you're a self-confessed enemy of the Const.
@jkirk1626 What are you talking about? Please explain where I said those things? The only ones talking about forcing your views on others through violence are you right-wing nutjobs who want to oppress those who disagree with you using guns when the democratic process doesn't validate your ideas as being supported by the majority of Americans.
BTW I fully support the constitution and in fact swore an oath in the Army to defend it from all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC unlike some of you people
Well theres a very good reason fundamentalist christians are on the watch list for possible threats to the united states. In many of your other videos you talk about armed uprising, and how it's a christian's duty (which isn't true).
Thomas Jefferson (an advocate of the 2nd amendment) stated that the citizen DOES NOT have the right to bear arms in such a manner that it may threaten the sanctity of the public. A well-regulated militia.
@Balsology No, actually, Mr. Jefferson thought that a man should carry a firearm during his evening walks. The last thing you have to fear is a "fundamentalist" (whatever that means) Christian with a firearm. Any insane person, yes, especially the ones who tend to have a 1/2 mile long rap sheet by the time they ever use a gun for evil purposes. The Constitution ALWAYS uses the words "rights" in relation to the individual and "powers" with government...you know...militia.
@TNCelt1 Really? I get threatened all the time by these so called "Righteous" fundy Christians. I find them to be as extreme and as dangerous as Islamic extremists and I've lived in places like Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries so I know what I'm talking about. I've been threatened by these nutjobs, my friends and family have been threatened, and the ones I've talked to face to face do nothing but spew out hatred and racism. So yeah, I do see them as terrorists.
@wigon So, you don't really refute any of the the rest of the post? As for "Christians", those aren't. If you call yourself a Christian, but live and threaten others, (i.e. live diametrically the opposite of the gospel, you aren't a Christian...just a nut.) On the other hand, if you follow the koran, you must live out the violence that it commands you to do. So you see a lot of muslims being beheaded by "christians" and mosques burned down, huh? Women maimed by them too, huh?
@TNCelt1 Do you see alot of Muslims here in America going around beheading non-Muslims. Aside from warzones in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, you don't don't see Muslims going around butchering non-Muslims. The attrocities you see in those warzones are also not a Muslim monopoloy. You only have to look as far as Mexico, Colombia, and the Congo to see horrific acts of savagery done by non-Muslims.
Beheading has actually become quite popular in Mexico's drug wars.
@TNCelt1 Women especially have been victimized in Mexico's violence. Simply look at the history of women working at the "Maquiladoras". The Qur'an BTW is all in how it is interpreted. Generally most Muslims believe in Jihad only as far as defensive war although it is argued by extremists that Jihad of conquest must be constant against kufr (infidel) states. But there are counter-arguements in Islamic theology to that which I can go into if you want.
@wigon I think you're full of crap. The actual occurences of terrorism, "honor killings", church burnings, etc...bear this out. You're not dealing with Christians. You're dealing with nuts who call themselves Christians. Read the bible. You'll see the difference, unlike how muslims are to live out their lives.
@TNCelt1 Hindus do just as many honor killings (which has more to do with culture then religion). Church burnings happen all the time in America done by non-Muslims and terrorism is being done all over the world by non-Muslims as well (in the nations mentioned earlier for example). The Muslim-Americans I've worked with have all been model citizens helping to improve their communities and not threatening anyone. They do however face constant threats from your extremist Christian friends.
@wigon Funny, we see you as a terrorists, too. Why don't you go live in those countries if you admire Islam so much and get away from us evil right wing terrorists? Funny that somebody like you talks about spewing hatred and racism when that's all you do. Next time you want to see a terrorist, look in the bathroom mirror, bud.
@WeVoteRight As I've said, I try to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ unlike you. Please tell everyone here about your grand solutions for fixing the economy as you are the economics expert and the greatest patriot. I only served in the Army, help run a top performing charter school, and volunteer in urban agricultural programs, and I am involved in local politics and other forms of civic activism. Obviously I don't care about America.
@wigon ,So, you're basically a community organizer, right? Lol, my solutions are simple--reform the tax system, reform the entitlement system, cut every federal department that can be handled by the states, and pay down this debt. Decertify all federal unions, pass a balanced budget amendment, reform the fed so that it's only mission is a strong dollar and bring it under congressional review. And that's just to start. Does this sound extreme to you, race baiter?
@WeVoteRight The devil's in the details. Please explain to the readers what Federal government departments you want to destroy. Oh..and speaking of race please give us your views about how illegal immigrants are the cause for all our social ills and how they contribute nothing to America (nevermind dozens of peer-reviewed studies refuting your views).
@wigon Man, that's an easy one--Department of Education would be first on my slash list; the EPA; Department of Energy; Department of Homeland Security would be the major one's. Just about any department that can be handled at the state level would be gone. The fact is we have immigrations laws. They should be enforced. For people like you some laws should be enforced and laws you don't agree with shouldn't be enforced. You're typical of the progressive movement--hypocritical to the very end.
@WeVoteRight Yes because we all know that state governments are SOOO much more efficient at doing things. lol Funny how you talk about laws but then speak of breaking other federal laws with armed resistance. But like a typical racist I know you're fine with government oppression of brown folks. But when it comes to you... you go apeshit and insist that you can break the laws because you've decided that they are unconstitutional as you are so obviously a well-trained constitutional scholar.
@wigon LOL, and the federal government is doing such a stand up job with trillion dollar deficits and the debasement of our currency, right? If the federal government would do it's job and it's CONSTITUTIONAL duties there probably wouldn't be a need to stand up and say no more. Like a typical race baiter you try and distort the issue in true Saul Alinsky fashion by calling me names instead of explaining why you support the breaking of our nation's immigration laws. Can you explain, racebaiter?
@WeVoteRight Yes and a revolution to overthrow the government would totally fix our economic problems right? And economic policy is linked to the constitution how exaxctly? Come one you're the scholar. Oh wait.. TAXES. YES! The 18th Amendment allows for the Feds to TAX YOUR ASS OFF! Totally constitutional.
Ah I see like a true hypocrit you can disagree with federal laws but I can't. I forgot liberals don't have freedom of speech in your vision of America.
@wigon A revolution may be needed because you progressives won't stop until we're all living in a socialist hellhole. And with a paralyzed and polarized federal government unable to do it's Constitutional duties or dig itself out of the financial abyss it caused, I see nothing but chaos in the future. Cloward and Piven, right, libtard? We're not going to let you take this country down that road. You try and impose your marxist/socialist bullshit on us and you'll see how real Americans react.
@WeVoteRight Again your threats of terrorism to murder government employees because you don't agree with what a democratic government decides and want instant gratification like a spoiled brat instead of working hard with grass roots politics to make change democratically. You have a sickness my friend and only Jesus Christ can cure the evil in your heart.
@WeVoteRight Thank God most Americans aren't savage, hateful, racists who threaten violence against people who try to express their views peacefully and democratically. God Bless America and God forgive fools like yourself.
@WeVoteRight This guy wigon is a psychotic. He gets drunk and trolls around harrassing people, everything he said to you in this room is almost a mirror image of what he said to me in QE2 room. He is a pro state capitalist, communist pig, liberal progressive douchebag who rants about how he loves America and at the same time pisses on the constitution.One more thing, he is a Government employee, possibly a mailman or a lawyer, he's too stupid to be a mailman so I'm gonna vote lawyer. Peace
Molotov.......YOU DA MAN!!!
eyewarnedyou 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from illuminatitv
You hit the ball out of the park again Molotov. Great Job.
penguinistas 1 month ago
Maybe this fuckface should ask Gabby Giffords if right-wing terrorism exists in America.
BigJim117 1 month ago
@BigJim117 The guy who shot Congresswoman Giffords was ill, wasn't on some mission to attack her (she happened to be at the scene), and was left-wing (by the literature found at his dwelling). Please try not to create false associations. Also, crazed madmen are not typically labeled terrorists.
dbirchle 1 month ago 3
@dbirchle At least, they aren't labeled terrorists because they are crazed; the label is given based on intent and method. Method, I'll give you, but intent to terrify and oppress by going off the handle and killing random people? Please.
dbirchle 1 month ago
@dbirchle Actually according to his friends, Jared Lee Loughner had disliked Giffords for a long time & kept a form letter that thanked him for attending a 2007 event in an envelope scrawled with "Die bitch" and "Assasination Plans have been made."
colorzebra689 2 weeks ago
@BigJim117 You clearly
have no clue who did that or why....
MsOwlwoman 3 weeks ago
The Repukes fucked this country in the ass. Fuck you very much. Teddy R. must be spinning in his grave.
AzazelsRevenge 1 month ago
hilarious that this guy ends his "it's ridiculous for the gov to worry about violence from right wing extremists" with a threat of armed revolution.
jlrs4 2 months ago
The GOP will not raise taxes on the wealthy Americans. IF tax cuts created jobs, we should all be employed, making 50k a yr..right? LOL. Wat a crock of shit the REPUKES feed the ppl. Their first duty is to country, NOT a fucking tax pledge meant to make the rich RICHER. END BUSH TAX CUTS...YESTRDAY!!!
AzazelsRevenge 2 months ago
I agree that Obama is a shitty, Do-nothing president. But this guys arguments are nonsensical paranoid delusions. all that does is make your point of view less credible. as a conservative, i would appreciate legitimate arguments that don't make my positions look like childish name calling.
straightfacedfsu 2 months ago
@straightfacedfsu Wat would you call Congress? You GOPPERS obstruct, filibuster, and generally have been screwin the American ppl. You don't even have an argument.
AzazelsRevenge 2 months ago
@AzazelsRevenge you're not even addressing what I was arguing. read what i wrote before you get angry. I'm arguing AGAINST the conservative nonsensical propaganda here. And besides that, the current GOP is NOT conservative in my opinion. they are neocons, and that is VERY different. when i refer to myself as conservative, I mean Teddy Roosevelt conservative, not Goldwater/Nixon/Reagan neoconservative wacko. Those guys are radicals, not conservatives. please read more carefully
straightfacedfsu 2 months ago
@straightfacedfsu Lol Reagan is an extremist? I think you are just "extremely" wrong.
FrankDaTank1218 1 month ago
@FrankDaTank1218 Reagan is NOT an extremist in terms of today's GOP. But relative to traditional conservatives such as Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, etc, his ideology is very different. my point is there's a difference between conservatives and neoconservatives. Reagan was a neocon, not a traditional conservative. Try and work on your reading comprehension skills.
straightfacedfsu 1 month ago
@straightfacedfsu Teddy Roosevelt a "traditional conservative?" Check your facts again, sir. Here's a good start for you.
JTHSanDiego 1 month ago
@FrankDaTank1218 And where did you see me use the word "Extremist"? sorry, but i didn't even use that word.
straightfacedfsu 1 month ago
@straightfacedfsu Dude, the Teddy R party is gone. Do you think he would approve of wats going on in the GOP today? The neo=cons have killed the USA. I will read more carefully, and good luck. The pols today are bought and paid for.
AzazelsRevenge 1 month ago
@AzazelsRevenge i absolutely agree. i think the real problem is the politicians are now influenced by corporations who can anonymously donate as much as they want. Corporations have the same "rights" as individual citizens? give me a break. talk about the end of anything resembling a functional republic. unless you consider the corporations to be the real representatives. which i guess they are now. im moving to Denmark...
straightfacedfsu 1 month ago
Right Wing Extremist, Pro-Life, Catholic.
kevinjjfr 4 months ago
I'm ready.
phoenixrising97 4 months ago
What a bunch of garbage.
edgwaterprog 4 months ago
i'm prepared for 1936 Spain.
death9719 4 months ago
osama a right wing muslim
death9719 4 months ago
Do You Even Know What The Fuck An Extreamist Is You And Your Propaganda Haha! Go To Russia And You'll Surly See Fucking Right Wing Extreamist There!
Shooting And Killing And Boot Partying Immigrants Over There! For The Record : Most Nazi's From Around The World Are In Russia!
IRatherBeDeadThanRed 5 months ago
Amen brotha!
IceBlood888 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all the good parts, you know the ones that supports murder, bigotry, incest, abortion, genocide, infanticide, and slavery.
FREEAMERICANOW69 5 months ago
it's clear that he doesn't know what the word, extremist is or that they, right-wing extremists are willing to kill for their beliefs, even though they won't test their beliefs to make sure they're right and doesn't care that other people doesn't care in their beliefs at all.
just like people who killed abortionists because they claimed that their bible, gives them the right to do it...but the bible supports abortion, genocide, infanticide, murder and slavery.
these people are stupid.
FREEAMERICANOW69 5 months ago
@FREEAMERICANOW69 you again ?? go Tell your mom to abort you
adoptedoneathotmail 5 months ago
@FREEAMERICANOW69 your lies are getting old..try reading the Bible
adoptedoneathotmail 5 months ago
@FREEAMERICANOW69 Trolololo
ThatHaloGuy117 5 months ago
Democrats Republicans, just different sides of the same coin and sadly both are equally ineffective.
Our elected officals, just pigs feeding at the trough, no longer governing just fighting over turf while our country falters. Just like before, clearly taxation without representation.
Divided we kneel, but UNITED WE STAND 1776 was when the first shot was fired
but 1775 is when the first militias started forming.
So YES! we are getting ready.
Get off your knees America, and join us.
unitedwestand1775 7 months ago
@unitedwestand1775 Don't stand on the left or the right, if you do you obviously are telling everyone you prefer to be a country divided. Stand in the middle where in counts, independent! Take the best of both parties and make America what it needs to be.
memback01 6 months ago
@memback01 Not america? We were born with a small government, lets keep it that way.
IceBlood888 5 months ago
@IceBlood888 relevance to my statement?
memback01 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@IceBlood888 "Take the best of both parties and make America what it needs to be." - Not america? (Not American because large government will never be american) - "Stand in the middle where in counts, independent!" - We were born with a small government, lets keep it that way.
IceBlood888 5 months ago
I like the NOPE shirt.
XiaoFury 8 months ago
For the Record): Berhard Von Nothause was sentenced to prison for over 20 years ,he was covicted as a terrorist because he made silver coins that had the word DOLLAR on it.He did not commit a violent action ,not one
CrashMarket 8 months ago
121 people are proletariat dungbeatles
Pighood 8 months ago
This is the Progressives' definition of a terrorist: a GOP voter. We Republicans scare Democrats. Leftists have nightmares about conservative governance. They fear we'll outlaw tofu and force vegetarians to eat Porterhouse steaks broiled rare. They fear we'll do something unspeakably reactionary, such as defining the USA as the homeland of the American citizenry. What scares Lib Dems the most is that prosperity and self-reliance may replace govt dependence and freeloading off the public trough.
viriatoist 8 months ago 10
@viriatoist
>>This is the Progressives' definition of a terrorist: a GOP voter.
No. A right-wing terrorist would be the following:
The anti-tax crowd who resort to violence and raise militias to overthrow the Fed. A great example was a man who crashed his plane into a government office.
The pro-lifers who KILL doctors and vandalize clinics.
Christians who kill/threaten/use violence against homosexuals and atheists.
We must not ignore this problem, it is real, and it threatens our society.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>In either of those two egalitarian utopias
You are using the word "egalitarian" incorrectly.
>>Orwell denounced collectivism
Orwell was a Democratic Socialist. He opposed Authoritarianism. You also miss the mark in that we are a collectivist species. Only the last several thousand years have we started to ignore that aspect of ourselves as we fashioned societies.
You also didn't address what I said: we need to oppose violent right-wing extremists for societal health.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist Well I'm pretty much afraid that, conservatives will roll the dice back to the early 1900's in where people like Boss Tweed are abusing the political process. There is no minimum wage or age limit, workers can't unionize or go on strike. And the middle class goes extinct, and where infectious diseases roam the slums becuase people can't afford adequate health care, not mention the destruction of the public school system. Well at least the rich by that point won't be paying any taxes.
slicingwater 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>In whose America has the middle class prospered
If you examine the numbers, the middle class is slightly growing, at the expense of the working class. The wealthy have been slowly getting richer over the last decades, while the working class has had less and less wealth at its disposal. This started after the 80s.
We are in serious need of a complete regulatory overhaul of business. Healthcare should be socialized, and the wealthy should be taxed 80% like they were decades ago.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>geniuses can simply refuse to innovate and produce
Fine. Others will fill their shoes. There are millions of geniuses out there, and most of us have different views on humanity and society.
>>limits on success
Qualify it: Limits means you cannot dump poison into rivers. You cannot employ children. You cannot falsely label products. See the pattern? Limits mean ways to keep society healthy. Taxes used to be really high for the rich, and jobs didn't suffer. Look at the numbers.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>individualism and success
Two words without definition here.
>>Mediocrity is not an alternative to excellence
You assume that selfishness and greed lead to excellence. They do not.
>>typical of a Democratic American
Across Europe, with its very liberal populations, they are enjoying comfort and prosperity. They are positively perplexed at our fixation on ignoring the needs of the poor and weak. We have a dysfunctional culture at the moment, it is controlled by a wealthy few.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>Who's the arbiter of what constitutes "enough money"?
Depends on the government type. In our case, we have final authority, the president has immediate authority and congress have deliberative authority.
>>prosperous and self-reliant
What year are you living in? Most Americans are in debt, barely able to make ends meet with two jobs because of bills. Others are unemployed.
>>Americans are conservatives
Americans are diverse. Do not speak for all of them who have no voice here.
kDest 8 months ago
@viriatoist That's surprising considering under President Eisenhower, the tax rate for the rich was 90%. Also I don't understand why you conservatives don't want the rich to pay their share of taxes, and want to leave the poor high and dry. Since you don't think the rich deserve to or can't pay their taxes. And cutting programs for the poor pretty much prevents anyone from the lower tax bracket from moving on up. Or just staying up.
slicingwater 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>Only masochists want to be cash cows of parasitical govt.
It is a social responsibility. Accumulated wealth just leads to irresponsible power and political meddling. It should go to the public good. Wealthy people can afford high taxes, because what's left over for them still allows them to enjoy a luxurious lifestyle, it just weakens their ability to cause social damage.
>>don't tax winners to subsidize losers
If you don't like it live in an anarchy. Society requires compromise.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>what constitutes responsible behavior for able-bodied intelligent adults
Depends on the type of government, and its division of power. If you don't like it, you can always move to another state. Most of us would rather have a fair society, rather than one which has an ideological axe to grind.
>>Obama and Bill Gates
That's easy. Neither are geniuses, but Obama was more capable than Gates. Gates dropped out, and through sheer luck happened upon a burgeoning market.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>Is nature fair?
No, but if you're going to make a naturalistic argument you better not use medicine or eat modern food.
>>Have you noticed that we're not all equally gifted?
There is a difference between being different, and being superior. No person is superior to another.
>>When we humans are oppressed
An egalitarian society is not oppressive. It is fair.
>>America is conservative
America is ideologically diverse, with most people just wanting a comfortable, meaningful life.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@viriatoist
>>Geniuses are not superior to imbeciles?
No, they are not. They have better intelligence but are not superior people. That is because intelligence, strength, wealth, charisma etc. are all qualities that distinguish us but none of them are better than the other objectively. It comes down to preference.
>>America's culture is entirely owed to capitalists
You need to retake history, with attention to the enlightenment.
>>statists, have contributed nothing
America is a STATE.
kDest 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>a self-made billionaire has nothing to do with luck
Firstly, no one is self-made. Your parents made you, so did your environment, teachers, and friends. Secondly, it is all about luck. Luck of the traits you were born with, luck of having a moment of inspiration, luck of having the financial resources and social connections. The luck that you hit a market at the right time, and have the perfect product. The luck that your competitors fail to put you out of business while small.
kDest 8 months ago
@kDest You envious types should see your statist utopia (republic of herd mentality) realized. The entrepreneurial elite who innovate and create businesses will not cooperate and will respond by dissolving and liquidating their businesses. The resulting economic and brain drain will bankrupt your utopia. Doesn't the failure of North Korean and Cuban communism teach you anything? Doesn't the success of capitalist Switzerland and Hong Kong teach you anything? Mediocrities don't generate progress.
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>You envious types
Projection and red herring.
>>statist utopia
Given that anarchy and minarchy do not work...
>>entrepreneurial elite who innovate and create businesses will not cooperate
You ripped that from Atlas Shrugged. Care to do some individual thinking, instead of spouting thinly veiled aristocracy propaganda?
>>liquidating their businesses
Even if they did, we do not need them, they need us. Others will take their place who care about societal welfare and law.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>Roman Catholic, I don't exactly hold truck with Ayn Rand
You assimilated her objectivist dogma through third party sources. I know one thing: Jesus was a communist, and he would be very cross with you for looking down on your brothers.
You really cannot call yourself a Christian while envying the rich, and defending them. Jesus was very clear about the wealthy: they are hellbound. His teachings make it clear that you must live in voluntary poverty.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>I don't envy the rich. I happen to be rich
So rich you have to spend time defending yourself to someone who doesn't care. You're a very insecure person.
>>I've never been poor
What business then do you have talking about matters of life and death when you know nothing personal about them? It's sad when people blunder about talking about things of which they know nothing.
>>America's disintegrative flaw is its mongrel societal model
What do I care about a fool's opinion?
kDest 8 months ago
@kDest Learn how to spell and learn syntax and idiomatic English, moron!
viriatoist 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>And I certainly do not subconsciously assimilate stimuli.
You are supposedly a Roman Catholic but you subscribe to key points of objectivism. Either you've absorbed the rantings of Rand, or you're just a big hypocrite.
>>As a rather successful alumnus
You can't be very successful if you're busy proving your worth to some bloke on the internet. That is the stink of insecurity.
>>You remind me of Trotskyists
I don't really care. I am not relevant to the discussion.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>You wouldn't be a successful poker player, given that you've exposed your cards.
Such a tool... Keep them coming! You have me in stitches.
>>We were barons when the Plantagenets cleaned our stables.
Ah, to measure yourself by the deeds of OTHERS.
>>As Churchill said, "Know thy enemy!'
Churchill was smart. You haven't even come close, which is just sad.
kDest 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>resulting economic and brain drain
Not every genius is a selfish prick. Not every inventor cares only about #1. I say, bankrupt them and force them out of society. Then moral innovators can take their place and we can have a working society.
>>North Korean and Cuban communism
You mean totalitarianism and authoritarianism that is simply a different shade of your pro-aristocratic propaganda? Egalitarianism is the way, not castes, not corporate fascism, and not aristocracy.
kDest 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>capitalist Switzerland
You mean socialist Switzerland. They support universal healthcare and compulsory coverage.
>>Hong Kong
You are now championing the merits of free government-provided healthcare, public schools, and government subsidized housing.
>>Mediocrities don't generate progress
Without the "mediocre" as you call them, there is no society for the advantaged to work with. There is no food, no water, no medicine. The "mediocre" toil every day to give you infrastructure.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>Technology has rendered mediocrities superfluous
And yet you're still here.
>>you've obviously never been to Hong Kong or to Switzerland
Says the man who did not know about their socialist programs.
>>is the key to the success of these rich communities
I'm more concerned about the success of the people, not a greedy and selfish minority whose existence is owed to their leeching from the fruits of other people's labor.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>As a Roman catholic, I'd roast you (literally). I'd exterminate you. If war is what you want, so be it! I'll gladly kill you!
You're quite a hellbound one, to violate your Lord's commands.
>>I've lived most of my life in Switzerland and most of the rest of it in Hong Kong
That only suggests to me that you're wildly oblivious.
>>Labor is obsolete
Without others' labor you'd be tilling the fields. You're oblivious, that settles it.
Thanks for the laughs, dearie!
kDest 8 months ago
@kDest Dearie? How sweet!
viriatoist 8 months ago
@kDest I've lived most of my life in Switzerland and most of the rest of it in Hong Kong. Hai capito, donniciola?
viriatoist 8 months ago
@kDest Labor is obsolete. Creativity is the productive element.
viriatoist 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>is entirely owed to deliberate design
Billions of people work hard, but only a thousand achieve great success due to sheer luck of opportunity. But keep believing in the American dream, it's extremely profitable for businesses that you maintain faith.
>>Losers have always been and will always be irrelevant nonentities
It's interesting how you write yourself off that way. Your dogma expects you to believe that you are part of the enlightened, when you are the losers written about.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
While Obama made something of himself in a segment of society that is extremely judgmental and quick to assassinate characters.
>>Soviet Communism
And? How is this important?
>>the stuff of archeology
Which is an evidence-based field, which has much to say about our tribal, collectivist nature.
>>we walk upright nowadays
You mean, without empathy that comes with a small group, but you disapprove of laws which try to approximate empathy for a large population.
kDest 8 months ago
Comment removed
viriatoist 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>The problem with those who preach empathy is that they want to exercise it at someone else's expense and recur to coercion to make it compulsory.
Do you live in a society? How big is it? Hundreds of millions. You cannot humanly feel empathy for each and every individual, so we make laws which restrain your actions so that they are more empathetic for the people you never see or hear about. If we were a tribe of 30 people, these laws would be redundant.
kDest 8 months ago
@viriatoist
>>tangible accomplishment
He passed healthcare reforms, improved our image in the Middle East with diplomacy, assassinated Bin Laden (something that Bush couldn't do in 7 years), repealed the DADT law, and kept us out of a 1930s-style depression. I'd say he did very well for the first 2 years.
>>Socialism failed
Europe is quite happy with it.
>>societies equally miserable
Not really. It turns out when you regulate business and tax the rich, everyone else can breathe easier.
kDest 8 months ago
@viriatoist Your source?
slicingwater 8 months ago
@viriatoist Actually lefties have nightmares about authoritarian governance, I actually would like to see conservative governance it would be a huge improvement. What really scares me as a liberal is that Republicrats ill again suspend heabeus corpus & in order to defend freedom lock thousands of innocent people up.
yellowkrux 6 months ago
speaking of terrified you are terrified only for one reason Obama has dark skin and you and kkk white and your white supremist buddies are fit to be tied,if there is a god I hope there is a republican that is black run for president you people would go batchit insane.
johndebbra 8 months ago
@johndebbra There is....Herman Cain.
SbaDefender 8 months ago
@SbaDefender well i hope He gets elected in fact i would vote for him 10000 times if i could these white supremest would climb the freakin walls i think i would even take money out of my 401k to get him elected,,just to see people like Malotov squeel and complain ,and i am a white man :)
johndebbra 8 months ago
@johndebbra I hope you don't actually mean that. Voting for a man because of skin color is a horrific choice. As for myself, I am rooting for Ron Paul, a Constitutionalist, and a TRUE liberal. He is running as a republican and picking up a lot of traction; and by no means is he a white supremacist.
SbaDefender 8 months ago
@SbaDefender i was not serious however to be honest anyone that votes i think should look at both sides if a democrat sees a republican they think is better vote that way if republican sees a democrat vote for them most people have no idea who they are voting for if they are Republican they will vote republican even if the guy was Hitler if they are Democratic they will vote for a democratic even if the person was Stalin..please realize Hitler and Stalin purely example.
johndebbra 8 months ago
@johndebbra Thanks for clearing up that last part. I was about to be pissed that you made Stalin Democrat instead of Republican. All Hail Stalin...=) I completely agree that voting based only on political party is. As for this guy, I disagree with most of what he says, however I still support his right to say it. If it's not too intrusive, may I ask who you like the most, thus far for president? If you've followed along enough to be comfortable with a decision.
SbaDefender 8 months ago
@SbaDefender
>>I am rooting for Ron Paul, a Constitutionalist, and a TRUE liberal.
Ron Paul is anything but Liberal. He supports segregation, and an employer's "right" to fire you or refuse to hire you because you're not a white man. He believes the same for the disabled too, that employers should be able to refuse service or accommodations to them.
That's the exact opposite of liberalism, which believes that we should all be treated equally, and have equal opportunity.
kDest 8 months ago
@SbaDefender
>>He is running as a republican and picking up a lot of traction; and by no means is he a white supremacist.
That's the great little irony of it all. He most certainly isn't a white supremacist... he just believes that if a business owner tells you "No spooks allowed" or places "Whites Only" signs... well, it sucks to be you then because he will stand up for that poor, innocent businessman's right to discriminate, in the face of "evil" government "oppression" (equality).
kDest 8 months ago
brilliant!
luvunitedluvguns 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hell yes!!! We are ready!!!
fishslayer25 8 months ago
I like the quote "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice"
1982patriot 9 months ago 2
americans are not ready for the y2k, their ready for the 1776 ): )
jimUkay 9 months ago
I have no idea what you are talking about. Am i supposed to understand?
sadana0 10 months ago
So you're saying the right wing isn't extreme - then you're asking for armed revolution. Are you going to do a video on hypocrisy next? Or are we to believe that all of your videos cover that topic in depth merely by example?
valkhorn 11 months ago
@valkhorn I wouldn't consider armed revolution extreme. I'd consider tyranny extreme.
Grubbernaut 8 months ago
@Grubbernaut
Terrorism to one person is patriotism to another. Tyranny to one is also progress to another. What do you consider tyranny? Do you consider the Vietnam War tyranny, or do you consider universal healthcare tyranny?
valkhorn 8 months ago
@valkhorn Both are tyranny.
Grubbernaut 8 months ago
At least Obama didn't have to steal his elections. Shows what the general population thinks of Democrats eh?
Gothguy47 11 months ago
@vinillanut
There's a big difference between abortion and the death penalty. Killing a fetus, ends takes away their future. Killing a murderer or rapist accomplishes the same thing, however a fetus never took away the lives of others or destroyed their future like criminals do. A fetus is innocent. Abortion= punishing someone else for your actions. Death penalty=punishing a criminal for their actions.
Danthemanlyman7 11 months ago
i like guns but thats about all i like about rebuplicans you guys yell ate people who want abortions but are ok with death penity
vinillanut 11 months ago
dude your gay
vinillanut 11 months ago
Again, Embarrassing! What the hell is this? It's not even an argument. And a threat at the end? I am not really sure. A video that is a BIG MESS. I like the Obama is terrified. I seen a short list of what the Republicans are sending to Iowa and NO THREAT THERE. Brings up an actual subject, the Debt and then talks about guns? If this is the level or forming an argument in the modern day, this country is doomed.
jondeare 11 months ago
@wigon by even responding to you, i know i am pleasuring you with a reaction. i will not, however, give you the pleasure of an angry, bitter response.
to assume that because someone advocates against xenophobia because they themselves are the target of xenophobia (or in this case, islamophobia) is your first wrong assumption friend. in reality, i am a poor college student with no particular religious faith. in fact, i know more about Christianity than i do about Islam.
stopislamophobia 1 year ago
@stopislamophobia Um... I wasn't planning on writing a bitter response. Guess what...I'm also not Muslim. lol! Like you I don't follow any organized religion, however I do study Islamic theology as a cultural anthropologist doing research in alternative methods of counter-terrorism. As such I spend alot of time around Muslims so I'm used to calling them "brother" as they call me that even though I'm not Muslim.
:)
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon ah - my apologies. you see, i'm over-defensive on youtube. usually when someone uses a Islamic term in a sentence to me, it's used sarcastically.
alternative methods to counter-terrorism using cultural anthropology - by chance, is this sponsored by the military? either way, any alternative to using violence to fight an ideology fueled by violent acts done against them i profoundly support. keep it up brother.
have you read Schools into Stones?
stopislamophobia 1 year ago
@stopislamophobia I was setting up to go to Afghanistan with the State Dept. but family illness prevented from gong so I'm stuck here and right now everything I do is out of my own pocket. So nope, no government funding. I also have some issues with the Human Terrain Systems program. Basically I study islamic theology in order to develop Islamic based counter-propaganda to refute Wahabi/Salafi/Deobandi extremist theology. That book is by Greg Mortenson right? I've read 3 Cups of Tea. Great book
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon ah, well i hope you're able to make ends meet. i was just asking if it was related to the military because many of the officers have to take some anthro classes and do some Islamic theology studying.
yes, the Human Terrain Systems program doesn't seem like an effective method and it betrays those we are trying to stop demonizing us. yes, 3 cups of tea. education as a possible counter to extremist Islam. it's possible, as long as the teachers are locals and teach their own culture.
stopislamophobia 1 year ago
@stopislamophobia Yeah I think that Greg Mortensen pretty much has it correct. I see him as a REAL American hero and the fact that he is still alive is in large part a testimony to the respect he has from powerful tribal leaders in the Pashtun regions and other regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Alot of American officers also agree that killing the Taliban is not the ultimate answer, but rather instead developing Islamic based dialog with them and gradual change that is culturaly relevant.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon yes. and even better would be to allow them to help themselves. empowering and allowing them to decide what is best for themselves.
i'm having a harder time defining what "progress" for humanity really is.
stopislamophobia 1 year ago
Comment removed
wigon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stopislamophobia I think that "progress" has a very different meaning to people in different parts of the world, but that sadly our single-minded vision of progress has often been adopted by many nations with catastrophic effects to culture and environment. Globalization of markets has been one primary driving force in this & it's not coincidental that globalization & Western hegemony of global economics is one of the chief topics commonly preached against by Imams all over the Islamic world
wigon 1 year ago
@stopislamophobia yes, i agree. thank you for your input. our comments are getting deleted and removed by the user (or by someone), but i can still see them.
stopislamophobia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"I don't regret setting bombs" Professor William Ayers
CornFedArmen 1 year ago
Last clarification (for those who would point out these facts to dispute my real message): I know have been more than 31 presidents, I counted only true Republicans and true Democrats ignoring Federalists, Democratic National Unionists, Whig, Democratic-Republicans, etc.
chrsbroski 1 year ago
I think he really made his point at the end (with the 1776 bit) that most of America is as knowledgeable about science and mathematics as Isaac Newton was about the modern computer, utterly clueless. And so, as most of America is clueless about science, they place their decisions in faith, over hard, unadorned facts. Now here comes the scary part, most American's, TRADITIONALLY (that is not regarding the most recent elections) are Republican and christian. (17 presidents Rep. 14 Dem.)
chrsbroski 1 year ago
As a clarification, I said FAIL at the end of my last post because Palin is as ignorant as you can get. She truly believes that the earth is 6000 years old, even though the scientific community is 99.8% sure that it is billions of years old, she can't even give an intelligent response to Couric in her interview, and she can't make a speech to save her life. Really Republican Party? Really McCain?
chrsbroski 1 year ago
The reason why people are buying guns is because they are arrogant, ignorant, and idiotic. They (as in the Republican aligned) are afraid a CHRISTIAN president (thats right, Obama is not muslim but christian) will hand the country over on a silver plater to the terrorists. Don't you think that before being nominated to show the face of a party they do background checks on these Senators? I guess not if you are in the Republican party as they voted for McCain and he chose Palin as his vp. FAIL!
chrsbroski 1 year ago
From what I gathered from this video is a ton of historical information taken out of context, the use of the extremely inaccurate right/left grid nonsense, and throwing out random buzz words like socialist, Nazi, terrorist, etc. Then ends the video with a pseudo threat to the president.
I guess its to much to ask for people to be intellectually honest. Oh well, whatever gets him views I guess.
DiscipleOfMetal 1 year ago
Yes, lets see the churches come up with billions of dollars needed for healthcare for the poor. Lets see the big mega-churches full of hypocrits like you Mr. "WeVoteRight" take over all the charities. They won't because they think like you instead of following what Jesus Christ actually taught about wealth and about helping the poor.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon Your an asshole everywhere you go aren't you little man?
IWOP1 1 year ago
@wigon You're such a moron. Get the greedy federal government's hands out of people's pocket and you'll see what mega churches and charities can do. You just want to protect laziness because you're probably some deadbeat living off the government dime like most progressives.
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
I already proved you are a liar...no need to go on. Anyone willing to read all your crap can judge for themselves and come to the same conclusion if they have two brain cells.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon No, you proved you're the liar and an idiot for all to see, statist.
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
I just did... but ok again calling you out on your lies: "Please show me a single nation that has no social programs and where everyone is rich because they work hard. Please....I beg you to show me where your ideology has worked in real life. You act like all poor people are lazy and don't work. In essence you act like a uncaring and arrogant atheist elitist who believes he's better then everyone who makes less money then he is and who spits upon anyone who DARES ask for help from him."
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon Look at this country the first 150 years before the rise of your religion, progressivism. There was no safety net and we did just fine. Lies, lies, lies, I have never said that. I don't see subsidizing laziness as a good thing and I think it creates a moral hazard. I think people and churches can do a better job helping the poor get back onto their feet than a welfare check.
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I beg of you to ask God for forgiveness for your horrific lies. Please accept Jesus Christ into your heart.
wigon 1 year ago
You know, right wing extremists include people like...the westboro baptist church, bin laden, 9/11 hijackers, many latino dictators from the far right (not talking about Fidel Castro, he s from the left.) Bush, who started a war for absolutely nothing,and also the famous inspid,child raping Pope.Awesome company you got there.
DanielBlueFist 1 year ago
who the hell is this douchbag spewing lies?
richstpete 1 year ago
Anyone can read the original memo which is dead-on accurate about right wing extremist militias who constantly threaten to use violence against the government. Mike also doesn't mention that the DoD defines anti-war protesters (liberals) as low-level terrorists. This is being faught by the ACLU. Mike goes on here to threaten violence again against the Obama administration at the end of this video...and then wonders why him and his kooks are called terrorists by the FBI. What a complete moron.
wigon 1 year ago
Conservatives are not just dangerous, but they are essentially morons.....
rlibos 1 year ago
Props to you for speaking your mind. You're probably on a watch-list already. Soon you'll be classified as a hate monger and have your speech outlawed under hate speech regulations.
jkirk1626 1 year ago
@jkirk1626 One can only hope.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon I'm glad a Leftist will concede hatred for freedom. Your totalitarian fruits already showed their colors with your fellow socialists (Nazis were a socialist party). The Constitution guarantees free speech against the gov. Nice to see you're a self-confessed enemy of the Const.
jkirk1626 1 year ago
@jkirk1626 What are you talking about? Please explain where I said those things? The only ones talking about forcing your views on others through violence are you right-wing nutjobs who want to oppress those who disagree with you using guns when the democratic process doesn't validate your ideas as being supported by the majority of Americans.
BTW I fully support the constitution and in fact swore an oath in the Army to defend it from all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC unlike some of you people
wigon 1 year ago
Well theres a very good reason fundamentalist christians are on the watch list for possible threats to the united states. In many of your other videos you talk about armed uprising, and how it's a christian's duty (which isn't true).
Thomas Jefferson (an advocate of the 2nd amendment) stated that the citizen DOES NOT have the right to bear arms in such a manner that it may threaten the sanctity of the public. A well-regulated militia.
Balsology 1 year ago
@Balsology No, actually, Mr. Jefferson thought that a man should carry a firearm during his evening walks. The last thing you have to fear is a "fundamentalist" (whatever that means) Christian with a firearm. Any insane person, yes, especially the ones who tend to have a 1/2 mile long rap sheet by the time they ever use a gun for evil purposes. The Constitution ALWAYS uses the words "rights" in relation to the individual and "powers" with government...you know...militia.
TNCelt1 1 year ago
@TNCelt1 Really? I get threatened all the time by these so called "Righteous" fundy Christians. I find them to be as extreme and as dangerous as Islamic extremists and I've lived in places like Saudi Arabia and other Muslim countries so I know what I'm talking about. I've been threatened by these nutjobs, my friends and family have been threatened, and the ones I've talked to face to face do nothing but spew out hatred and racism. So yeah, I do see them as terrorists.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon So, you don't really refute any of the the rest of the post? As for "Christians", those aren't. If you call yourself a Christian, but live and threaten others, (i.e. live diametrically the opposite of the gospel, you aren't a Christian...just a nut.) On the other hand, if you follow the koran, you must live out the violence that it commands you to do. So you see a lot of muslims being beheaded by "christians" and mosques burned down, huh? Women maimed by them too, huh?
TNCelt1 1 year ago
@TNCelt1 Do you see alot of Muslims here in America going around beheading non-Muslims. Aside from warzones in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, you don't don't see Muslims going around butchering non-Muslims. The attrocities you see in those warzones are also not a Muslim monopoloy. You only have to look as far as Mexico, Colombia, and the Congo to see horrific acts of savagery done by non-Muslims.
Beheading has actually become quite popular in Mexico's drug wars.
wigon 1 year ago
@TNCelt1 Women especially have been victimized in Mexico's violence. Simply look at the history of women working at the "Maquiladoras". The Qur'an BTW is all in how it is interpreted. Generally most Muslims believe in Jihad only as far as defensive war although it is argued by extremists that Jihad of conquest must be constant against kufr (infidel) states. But there are counter-arguements in Islamic theology to that which I can go into if you want.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon I think you're full of crap. The actual occurences of terrorism, "honor killings", church burnings, etc...bear this out. You're not dealing with Christians. You're dealing with nuts who call themselves Christians. Read the bible. You'll see the difference, unlike how muslims are to live out their lives.
TNCelt1 1 year ago
@TNCelt1 Hindus do just as many honor killings (which has more to do with culture then religion). Church burnings happen all the time in America done by non-Muslims and terrorism is being done all over the world by non-Muslims as well (in the nations mentioned earlier for example). The Muslim-Americans I've worked with have all been model citizens helping to improve their communities and not threatening anyone. They do however face constant threats from your extremist Christian friends.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon Funny, we see you as a terrorists, too. Why don't you go live in those countries if you admire Islam so much and get away from us evil right wing terrorists? Funny that somebody like you talks about spewing hatred and racism when that's all you do. Next time you want to see a terrorist, look in the bathroom mirror, bud.
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
@WeVoteRight As I've said, I try to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ unlike you. Please tell everyone here about your grand solutions for fixing the economy as you are the economics expert and the greatest patriot. I only served in the Army, help run a top performing charter school, and volunteer in urban agricultural programs, and I am involved in local politics and other forms of civic activism. Obviously I don't care about America.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon ,So, you're basically a community organizer, right? Lol, my solutions are simple--reform the tax system, reform the entitlement system, cut every federal department that can be handled by the states, and pay down this debt. Decertify all federal unions, pass a balanced budget amendment, reform the fed so that it's only mission is a strong dollar and bring it under congressional review. And that's just to start. Does this sound extreme to you, race baiter?
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
@WeVoteRight The devil's in the details. Please explain to the readers what Federal government departments you want to destroy. Oh..and speaking of race please give us your views about how illegal immigrants are the cause for all our social ills and how they contribute nothing to America (nevermind dozens of peer-reviewed studies refuting your views).
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon Man, that's an easy one--Department of Education would be first on my slash list; the EPA; Department of Energy; Department of Homeland Security would be the major one's. Just about any department that can be handled at the state level would be gone. The fact is we have immigrations laws. They should be enforced. For people like you some laws should be enforced and laws you don't agree with shouldn't be enforced. You're typical of the progressive movement--hypocritical to the very end.
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
@WeVoteRight Yes because we all know that state governments are SOOO much more efficient at doing things. lol Funny how you talk about laws but then speak of breaking other federal laws with armed resistance. But like a typical racist I know you're fine with government oppression of brown folks. But when it comes to you... you go apeshit and insist that you can break the laws because you've decided that they are unconstitutional as you are so obviously a well-trained constitutional scholar.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon LOL, and the federal government is doing such a stand up job with trillion dollar deficits and the debasement of our currency, right? If the federal government would do it's job and it's CONSTITUTIONAL duties there probably wouldn't be a need to stand up and say no more. Like a typical race baiter you try and distort the issue in true Saul Alinsky fashion by calling me names instead of explaining why you support the breaking of our nation's immigration laws. Can you explain, racebaiter?
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
@WeVoteRight Yes and a revolution to overthrow the government would totally fix our economic problems right? And economic policy is linked to the constitution how exaxctly? Come one you're the scholar. Oh wait.. TAXES. YES! The 18th Amendment allows for the Feds to TAX YOUR ASS OFF! Totally constitutional.
Ah I see like a true hypocrit you can disagree with federal laws but I can't. I forgot liberals don't have freedom of speech in your vision of America.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon A revolution may be needed because you progressives won't stop until we're all living in a socialist hellhole. And with a paralyzed and polarized federal government unable to do it's Constitutional duties or dig itself out of the financial abyss it caused, I see nothing but chaos in the future. Cloward and Piven, right, libtard? We're not going to let you take this country down that road. You try and impose your marxist/socialist bullshit on us and you'll see how real Americans react.
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
@WeVoteRight Again your threats of terrorism to murder government employees because you don't agree with what a democratic government decides and want instant gratification like a spoiled brat instead of working hard with grass roots politics to make change democratically. You have a sickness my friend and only Jesus Christ can cure the evil in your heart.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon No threats to terrorism, racist, just a will to tell marxist/socialist where they can stick it. Don't tread on me, libtard!
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
@WeVoteRight Thank God most Americans aren't savage, hateful, racists who threaten violence against people who try to express their views peacefully and democratically. God Bless America and God forgive fools like yourself.
wigon 1 year ago
@wigon Ok, name one racist thing I have said? I'm still waiting?
WeVoteRight 1 year ago
@WeVoteRight This guy wigon is a psychotic. He gets drunk and trolls around harrassing people, everything he said to you in this room is almost a mirror image of what he said to me in QE2 room. He is a pro state capitalist, communist pig, liberal progressive douchebag who rants about how he loves America and at the same time pisses on the constitution.One more thing, he is a Government employee, possibly a mailman or a lawyer, he's too stupid to be a mailman so I'm gonna vote lawyer. Peace
IWOP1