I have long thought of a way to taunt those foul minions of the vile Camel Merchant Cult until they become so cross that they will make a mistake, according to the commandment of Monty Python; and now I found the Egg of Columbus, unloosed the Gordian Knot and discovered the Philosopher's stone! It is Caliban the furry beast from The Tempest; and as the abomination in the play of Shakespeare, the Taliban a very furry, as they are banned from shaving their beards!
The question is therefore: Can they also be enticed with drink to quite worshipping the Camel Merchant or at least be banished to some remote and desolate haunted island? They are as credulous as the furry monster of Shakespeare is for sure, so hencefore they shall be called the Caliban:
TRINCULO By this good light, this is a very shallow monster! I afeard of him! A very weak monster! The man i' the moon! A most poor credulous monster! Well drawn, monster, in good sooth!
CALIBAN I'll show thee every fertile inch o' th' island; And I will kiss thy foot: I prithee, be my god.
TRINCULO By this light, a most perfidious and drunken monster! when 's god's asleep, he'll rob his bottle.
CALIBAN I'll kiss thy foot; I'll swear myself thy subject.
I don't think this is a good stretegy. The best stretegy I think is that US and its allies gather all the Taliban leaders and celebrate "DRAW MUHAMMAD DAY". This will make talibans run away. Tell them that you are there for freedom of speech and democracy and that you have celebrated a similar day in US few months back and all muslims enjoyed it. : )
darksun22light (18 hours ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam Reply The u.s would be nowhere without the Brits....better fighters & communicators, they could learn a lot for these men and women.
EXCUSE ME DUMBASS!!...THERE IS A REASON WHY U.S. IS THE ONLY SUPER POWER..,WE DONT NEED INSTRUCTION FROM THE BOTTOM OF A BOX THANK YOU
Do you guys not find it ironic that when the soviets invaded Afghanistan in 79- the U.S supported the muhajadeen who are now the taliban to fight against the Soviets and the Northern Allicance. Now we are on side of the Northern Alliance fighting against the taliban(muhajadeen)- simply amazing that's America for you.
We made a big mistake toppling Saddam. For one, he didn't have a finger in 9/11. For two, he kept the terrorists in check in his nation, executing anyone who opposed his authority. There's a reason why he was so brutal, because he had to be in order to stay in power. Him and Bin Laden shared a mutual hatred.
How will this offensive accomplish anything. The Taliban won't even have to fight. They can easily blend in with the population, which probably supports them, and then when we leave, it resorts to being a Taliban stronghold. Why would the people side with us when Opium is their lifeline. I'm curious if they are even aware of this. I think the intentions are good but it's just unwinnable.
The war should have never started but we've got to clean up the mess Bush left us. We've got to go through it till the end. I bid good luck to our troops, both Americans, Britons, and the innocent civilians that will no doubt die in the midst of the battle.
hmmm... Coalition forces killed five taliban and arrested many others. I thought this was a freakin' war? If we keep treating Afghanistan like a police action, we will surely regret it.
Fine. Each soldier down there costs 800.000€ in a sum while your families in calfornia are seen a bancrupt financial state household a rising crime and a rising drug consume and people paid with certificates of indebtedness. Good Job Boys. But dont worry - The money is not gone - Its just in the pockets of the war industry and theire owners. And they take just now theire sundowners in the caribbic. What are you fighting for? For nothing more than interests of gov. mil. and industies.
I write all this hoping people whether in ALabama or Florida or Arizona know same dumb ass stores with too many junk things on shelves made in China--USA economy is wasted..Doomed!! GOd can't wait til 2012 hits The world;thank god!
I hope the Taliban beats the Americans. America needs to stop trying to colonize the world and fix its 10% unemployment rate. Long Live the Mujahideen!
Amen to that and I'm 65 miles from Shit hole Washington DC --does'nt matter if I'm in DC or Florida or Calif same shit everywhere same stores Home Depots/Wal Marts Best Buys Chinese shit and Fat skanks for girls now--USA is doomed!!! failure of Leaders and shit for leaders Uncle Tom OBAMA!!
newtype: had the Taliban not overrun Afganistan (they are NOT Afghan) and allowed the place to be a training ground for their fellow cowardly Islamist murderers, NATO (NOT "the Amercans") wouldn't even be there. That means you're full of shit!
Actually the Taliban agreed to help us get rid of Bin Laden as long as we could provide proof that he did 9/1 however America had no proof and invaded anyway based upon SUSPICIONS. That is why what we did is ILLEGAL.
Illegal by WHAT law? The Taliban took over Aghanistan and have been victimizing the people ever since. I suppose NATO is part of this "illegal" operation as well?
Why are nominal leftists forever calling anything they don't like "illegal"?
This only makes it apparent you lot have no clue about the law.
It is illegal by international law. According to international law it is illegal to invade a country if the country did not declare war on you. Al Qaeda is not apart of the Afghan government, it is an organization that has no ties to the government. Just like the KKK has no affiliation with the US government. The Taliban came to power because the Afghans wanted them. The Taliban brought stability to Afghanistan. I have never heard an Afghan say they hate the Taliban, have you?
How do you know the Taliban did not bring stability to the Afghanistan, is it because it does not go along with what CNN says? And yes the Taliban was part of the Afghani government. Of course international law is not important when America decides to break it. It is only important when other countries break it.
I don't even watch CNN, sport, so stuff your stereotypes that keep you from having to think about what others say.
If you regard the destruction of centuries-old artifacts, regular public beatings of women, and burning of schools that dare teach girls as "stability" you're just about full of shit. Maybe a quart low.
First of all the Taliban didn't destroy those artifacts anothergroup di which was denouncd by the Taliban. Where is your proof of regular public beatings and burning of girl schools? Did you hear this from an Afghani citizen? And even if these lies were true Amerca used to do all these things to blacks with in the lifetime of my grandparents which was not too long ago. Should someone have invaded America killing thousands of Americans in order to bring about change?
The Taliban did that but it's amusing and informative to see you propagnadizing for them. Just WTF are you? "my proof" consists of years of reports from people in country of school burnings, acid attacks, and hijackings of busloads of people who were subsequently murdered.
America did what? I'm amazed at the lengths people will go to in order to attempt to equivocate. For one think pre-civil war America wasn't a training ground for religious killers. Also persecution of blacks was illegal.
Just because a country had a civil war doe not give you a right to invade. Our invasion was still illegal. Your "proof" is still no justification to illegally invade a country. Hijackings and acid attacks are crimes; crimes happen in every country, it is still not justification to invade sovereign countries.
sport, NATO is in afghanistan because it was and is a major training ground for islamists killers. How strange that you think international law protects countries involved in such activities.
By the way ,I was not talking about pre civil war American blacks were being lynched and black churches were being burned after the civil war, by the KKK whom were religious killers that were not arrested. You call the Taliban religious killers but Never has an Afghan called them that. It does not matter you think about the Taliban it only matters what the Afghans think. Apparently they were not to bad because the Afghans hate Americans and they want America OUT.
your apparent position, that the U. S. had no right to go into Afghanistan because crimes are committed in the U. S., is fairly silly.
it doesnt matter what YOU think, you don't know what Afghans have called the taliban, what do you think they call them when the taliban kidnap youung men and rape young women? is that an activity you defend? what does international law say about that?
1. NATO is sun by the U.S. and it broke internatinal law. Plain and simple. It is our foregin policy which caues all these attacks how many time do they haft to say that?
2.. You always talk aout the "attrocities" the Taliban commit yet the US government and the CIA do the exact same thing.
3. I get my information from Afghani sources. I rather get it from th people whom are being most effected by these policies.
4. PROVE they want the Taliban out. Did you talk to them?
When did the Taliban blow themselves up to kill a bunch of school girls? Please have enough integrity to not resort to telling lies to justify your position.
American sanctions and indiscriminate bombing have starved and blown up more little girls any one.
Its aganst international law to invade a country that has not declared war on you. Afghanisatn which was run by the Taliban never declared war on the United States. AlQueda is an organization that operated with in Afghanistan but it has no ties to the Afghan government so we can't attack them. Plus we had and still have no real evidence that Bin Laden was responsible. We only suspected that he did it.
you said that al queda has no ties to the afgan goverment but in 911 the taliban gave refuge to al queda and defended and sheltered Suddam Hussein. yes the Suddam Hussein who admitted after denying many times that he was responsible for 911.
The United States also gives safe haven for white supremacist groups. Does that mean that the U.S. government is responsible when they commit acts of terror against minorities? And Saddam would have never been responsible for 9/11 because the Al Queda hates Saddam, because he is a secular leader that does not rule by the Shariah. He is consider as an apostate ruler.
the US does not support the groups though. we have them cause its part of there freedom of speech/religion what ever. the taliban supplied and supported al queda and refused to help the US find Bin Laden.
The Taliban actually denounced the attacks and offered to help find Bin Laden. The only reason they did not hand him over is because we had NO PROOF he did it. This whole war is based upon a bunch of lies and HALF truths.
and no its al queda who threatened the peace. we simply in afganistan because al queda bombed us. the US doesnt mean to kill civilians but a war without civilian but not to kill them is unrealistic
You say Al Qaeda threatened the peace but there was NEVER ANY peace to begin with. This situation happened decades BEFORE 9/11. This situation started when we began setting up puppet regimes in the Muslim world, overthrowing governments, killing people through sanctions, supporting the Israelis and setting up military bases. We as Americans have brought this upon ourselves. Instead of admitting our wrongs we rather wage war on those who fight our tyranny.
we werent overthrowing goverments or what ever you say. the muslim countries had free will to choose what they wanted to do. thats why suddam hussein was in power.
We do over throw governments. What do you think we are doing in Afghanistan right now? Did the Afghans tell us to do this? Who sold Saddam POISON GAS to kill off the rebels? Who overthrew the president in Iran and installed the Shah? Who funded the Ethiopians to invade Somalia? Who do you think keeps Mubarak in power? Who do you think put & keeps the Saudis power? We fund & prop up tyrants so they can serve Ameirca not their people. Then we want to blame Islam for their problems.
first of all we attacked afganistan after 9 11.and last time i remembered we dont control somalia, and Iran. im pretty sure you knew that the US gave anthrax and other diseases. but not to use it to murder innocent people they were going to use it for medical research.right now you obviosly just trying to find things bad about the US and throwing it at me. you manage to show the bad side but nothing else. its okay to admit your country done wrong. but the US isnt as evil as as you make
We did attack Afghanistan after 9/11 but Afghanistan did not attack us and they agreed to help capture Osama. However we attacked anyway so that we can build a pipe line & install a NEW government. That is why we are killing the Taliban. We must kick out the old government in order to install a new PUPPET government. We did this in Iran by overthrowing theirdemocracy & installing the shah. We also did the same by funding the Ethiopian invasion of Somalia.
Correct! At 1st the Afghans agreed to hand over Bin Laden but they wanted proof. They have the right to want proof of a crime before they hand over their citizens. However we only had baseless accusations with NO proof. Now as you know when you accuse a person of a crime the plaintiff has the burden of evidence. If the plaintiff cant provide evidence then you can't call the person guilty. America claims to have principals but when dealing with nonWesterners we all of a sudden forget our values.
Bin laden said it himself he did it. he denied it the first few times than he admitted it. there are a few videos of it on you tube. he also tries to justify it.
1. Bin Laden didnt admit to 9/11. If he did he would probably be on the FBI list for 9/11. Look on the FBI list to check for yourself.
2. You can't invade a country to find one person. Imagine if an American killed 3 thousand people in another country. Would that country have the right to invade the United States and kill thousands of innocent Americans and overthrow our government to install one that was to their liking?
@profanum88 i do not recall the US attacking afganistan in 1998. 9/11 wasnt a afgan/taliban attack. it was an al queda attack. and yes since al queda attacked the US so we attacked back. it doesnt even make a difference if they were attacking us because of something we did in 1998, they are still attacking the US so of course we are going to attack back.
Look it up then. Clinton was trying to draw attention from the Lewinsky-affair so he bombed some villages in Afghanistan (and the UN sent a team to investigate, civilian villages and only civilians killed).
@profanum88 you just said he did it to draw attention away. you forgot to add that al qaeda was already trying to bomb us. they tried to assassinate clinton and already bombed us embassy in africa. we are kind of off topic dont you think.
@profanum88 well, you were trying to make it seem as if 911 was an afgan counter attack when really it was a terrorist organization who did the attack not afganistan. we attacked because al qaida is based in afganistan, that is where osama is and of course if you dont cooperate like the taliban we are going to attack you country, its as simple as that.
But the only al-Qaida-member in Afghanistan was Usama and the talibans offered to extradite him twice before you attacked.
Al-Qaida isnt now and has never been based in Afghanistan, it is mainly based in Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
I said that IF you were attacking Afghanistan as a retaliation for 9/11, then Afghanistan had the same right to attack the US (by the way 60 more countries has).
@profanum88 the taliban was creating a safe haven for al quada in taliban. that is were they were mainly. and the taliban said they will put him on trial but thats all. we wanted to destroy al quada.
and just in case you forgot that the US is the only one attacking afganistan. a bunch of european nations are backing us up. i think Sweden is fighting too.
the US didnt attack taliban as a counter strike, they were just in the way.
Al Qaida was formed by the CIA to fight the russians in Afghanistan, it was composed of mainly Saudis and Yemenites. The Taliban has different politic and religious ideas. The Taliban wanted nothing to do with al-qaida, and especially not after al-qaida attacked their ally the US.
The talibans offered to extradite him.
The official US statement was that Afghanistan was behind the attack by "making the action to theirs".
@profanum88 al queda was formed by islamic radicals who just so happen to be supplied by the CIA. afghanistan isnt a US ally. you said that they have nothing to do with al quada. well that is a stupid thing to say. the taliban allowed al quada to train in afghanistan. there beleifs are also very similar.
al-Qaida and the taliban doesnt share many beliefs. The Taliban originates from Pakistani islam and al-Qaida are Sulafists from Saudiarabia.
Al-Qaida doesnt have training-bases or anything like that, its an UNLINKED network, that means THEY DONT MEET, they dont talk, they dont take contact and so on.
@profanum88 no im not making this shit up. you are dumb because everyone knows that the taliban was supporting al qaida. everyone knows al quada was training and based at afganistan and the taliban allowed that.
No one outside the US and some retarded fucks outside the US "knows" anything of that sort. Everey fucking one knows they arent even the same kind of muslims. And every one knows al-qaida is an unlinked network (invented by the CIA to fight the russians in Afghanistan) and as such they dont have any bases (al-qaida means "the base", its an ideological base) at all.
@profanum88 the CIA didnt start al quada they just supported them. go look it up al qauda was supported by the taliban. wow for all this talk i would of thought you would of knew that. oh wait you only look at things that will feed you hate towards the US so why dont i just end it here. i can see that this is an unstable argument and all you are doing is finding anything bad about the US and throwing it out of proportion or exagerating it.
@profanum88 you obviously have no idea. The "taliban" took over Afghanistan and began murdering indiscrimately, in the best tradition of the bolsheviks and maoists they are so closely allied with philosophically.
@profanum88 the Taliban then were not the same as they are now I don't know what makes you think I supported them "then". Their philosophical link to Bolshevism doesn't mean they were "closely allied". They fought Bolsheviks; the USSR went into Afghanistan for reasons I'm not at all sure of. Similarly, I'm not at all sure the U. S. did the right thing by helping the Afghans to drive them out.
@profanum88 the USSR went into Afghanistan claiming there were terrorist bases used to train jihadi queers to fly planes into buildings? where did you get this bullshit?
@profanum88 al qaida have training bases in Afghanistan and Northern Iraq. The status of their links doesn't enter into it at all. 9/11 was done by Islamist lunatics and there is no need to establish a "proven in court" connection of any sort. These aren't bank robber or even drug smugglers, these are war crime conspirators. They have declared war on the West, not just on the U. S.
The USSR was going to secure democracy? Are you a lunatic?
@profanum88 of course al qaeda uses training bases, you dont' even know what you're saying... "GOT IT THIS TIME"... al qaeda operatives trained in Northern Iraq and Afghanistan. you complete IDIOT, the bases were overrun and shut down by U. S. and coalition forces, THAT IS HOW WE KNOW THERE WERE TRAINING BASES! Your "unlinked" BS is just that... BULLSHIT.
No its the HOLE IDEA with an UNLINKED organization, if they did they wouldnt be al-Qaida. You dont even know who the fuck your fighting in a war you dont know the reasons for, your the dumbest fucking people to ever walk the earth.
In northern iraq you say? You know that Saddam had no control of northern Iraq from 1991 an forward?
@profanum88 oh, I see, they're "unlinked" because if they're linked they'r'e not al qaeda.
you idiot.
we're fighting the witless assholes who pretend to fight for islam but really are the descendants of Hitler's biggest supporters, certain MidEast arabs.
so you know al qaeda were training in N. Iraq, then. i didn't say anything about any control of that area.
Thats right, its like saying that the US is an islamic republic. Its just right out extremely ignorant. Only fucking americans believe that shit.
No they werent, thats Turkey making fun of american ignorance to get permission to go into southern kurdistan and kill some kurds.But if they did, wtf would that have to do with the war?
@profanum88 who says the US is an islamic republic? al qaeda were training in N. Iraq and we found the airplane fuselages they were using. only leftist asshats believe the US went into Iraq for [whater harebrained reason the left pretend was the "pretense"]
@profanum88 the taliban did and do support al qaeda, and al qaeda had training facilities. you seem to be saying that al qaeda does nothing anywhere. that's quite daft.
the fuselages were in N. Iraq, you're quite ignorant and uninformed for someone who claims to be knowledgeable.
I didn't go into Iraq. The coalition did for a variety of reasons, not least that it is a strategic location and its gov't was corrupting the UN and financing terrorists of all descriptions.
No you dumb fuck I say its an UNLINKED organization, thats whats makes them special. Every cell of the organization is completely self-sufficient and completely unaware of any of the other cells. Al-Qaida isnt the name of the organization (it has none) but the name of ONE cell, it means "The base" ie the ideological base.
How the fuck can you have a main enemy and go to war and not even know what the fuck it is??
@profanum88 you apparently have no idea of the reasons the US gave for going into Iraq, preferring the idiotic lefty spin on the issue. You pretend to be an expert yet don't know this simple fact?
"those fucking fuselages" were used for training terrorists ya dumb fuck.
Yes I know them very well, of some reason no fucking american seems to remember them. Your the only people in the world going willingly to war without knowing why.
What fucking terrorist? PKK? What did they use them for? Why the fuck would they go through the trouble of getting fuselages?
@profanum88 I guess those fucking americans who don''t remember them were too busy fucking. most americans just go with the asshat nonsense put forth by the noisemakers about WMD or whatever. Do you actually think that every other country that went to war made sure all its people knew and agreed?
if you don't know about the fuselages, you know JACK SQUAT about this whole issue. you're just blowing smoke. WTF would you think the fuselages were for?
Every other country who got their people to support the war. The americans are the only people dumb enough to support a war and dont know why.
I have no fucking clue what they were used for. Training PKK-guerillas to hijack Turkish airplanes? Would be fucking stupid to train in actual fuselages, because you will most likely get caught either when optaining them or when using them.
@profanum88 folks like you don't understand why the wars are happening... don't project your shortcomings onto others, expecially not a whole country. that just makes you look a fool. So you admit you have no fucking clue. that's what I have been trying to tell you all along. You have no knowledge whatsoever regarding any of this. FOAD
Yes I know why the wars are fought. The funny thing is that the american population dont know why the wars are fought, and not even what their government used as pretences for the war, and still they support the wars.
I have no clue regarding the fuselages you made up, and you havent been able to answer.
@profanum88 the american population knows quite well why their boys are in Iraq and Afghanistan. That idiots on the anti-West left pretend otherwise prove nothing.
At least you admit you have no clue. WTF do you expect me to answer?
I made up nothing. You're making up this ridiclulous assertion that americans don't know why wars are fought. Prove that shit? You can't!
@profanum88 your ignorance of the fuselage training facilities found in Iraq is proof of your know-nothing bullshit. Your meaningless snivelling that "americans don't know why they went to war" is just you projecting your own witless nonsense on others.
You being unable to answer what the fuck the fuselages has to do with anything what they were used for, and why the fuck yur at war for is my proof, dumbass.
@profanum88 the fuselages were used to train rag-head faggots involved in hijackings, ya completely stupid fuck, NATO is in Afghanistan because the place was a fucking wasteland of hyuman misery where the local gov't was overwhelmed by world-class assholes who were destroying the place. the coalition is in Iraq because it was a lawless backwater corrupting the U. N. and sponsoring terrorist killers
@profanum88 so now you admit you know terrorists were training in Iraq.
It's so fun when "world class assholes" like you try to blame the U. S. for anything. Iraq was as fucking MESS you lying shit monkey! The U. S. did NOT go in alone. Iraq was corrupting the U. N. with the oil for food scam, how can you say Iraq had "no say so"? And they were giving money to the familes of Palestinian suicide bombers!
Yes of course, terrorists supported by the US who fought Saddam and who fought Turkey (witch was why Turkey did not let the US attack from the north).
Iraq had the highest living standard in the region.
Oil for food was an american plan to starve the Iraqis, thats the reason why they hated you. If it hadnt been for oil for food the Iraqis might have seen you as liberators.
Yes they started supporting Palestine after the Israeli terror attack of 1981.
Your "proof" is based upon American sources. Do you honestly think Americans are going to not be biased? America needs every excuse they can find to justify their illegal occupation. Funny how Americans will never really show how AFGHANS FEEL ABOUT THE SITUATION. Maybe because they will tell what is really going on. Maybe they will say that the acid attacks and hajackings are sterotypes that make up less than 1% of the crimes in the region.
sorry to break the news to you but during the time of the taliban regime there was a bloody civil war with more casualties than the whole afghan war... but i know that you wont even register what im sayin
Brandy, that is what we would expect in a country that is largely moslem. the problem is that Islam hasn't done a good job of controlling its stupid useless young men.
In the West we keep such folks busy by making them politicians.
War is waste of time as Real terrorists are in Washington DC... just like the movie shooter --all set up 9/11 wake up grunts you joined cause there were no REAL JOBS desperate thats all..I'm going to have nice Margarita while you drink that piss water in Afghanistan BYE!
Not as dumb as bunch of kids who waste time to join military that serves no real purpose as US military is only industry LEFT in USA....reason so many join is they know NO JOBS but fuckin Wal-Mart FAt ass skanks in charge there.
This is only an action for the cameras...seems that the war on TV is more real than the one on the ground. the Taliban are not stupid enough to fight fix battles. All you guys in the media...just...carry on with your work. you're doing a great job. Long live the free press!:))
Taking military pressure off gihadists in their home regions is not a good idea. Neither is a Vietnam-style escalation to prop up a corrupt regime. The only answer left is for NATO to be the harasser of the Taliban element, not the occupier of Afghanistan -- saw a cool site; Balkingpoints ; awesome satellite view of earth
these wars in muslim countries are a waste of time and human life. we will never win the hearts or minds of muslims. it is not in their physical constitutions to befriend us or anyone not muslim. let's get the hell out asap.
1000 crazy Muslims War over! The troops can come back to a beautiful economy and find out their Job and woman was taken by Jesus and his brother Jose....at the same time ....Damn that tequila was strong!
So Marjah is where a 1000 Islamic Nuts are. So how many predators does it take to obliterate Marjah? After obliterating Marjah from the air then send in the tanks, followed by the infantry. Where those leaving sufficiently searched to make certain that they weren't key Taliban or Alqaida members? Good luck US Soldiers, US Marines, & Afghan Soldiers. Hopefully it crushes this Afghani resistance. Bush&Dick dodged the Afghanistan War. Commander & Chief Barack Obama will now wrap it up for America.
We have ALL seen History Chanel documentarys. Thos folks, IS PROPAGANDA. The Taliban had warnings... they are long gone, entreched, or setting up IED's... the Russians lost battle there, so will America... new vietnam bitches, just that the Afghanistan has too many mountains for these cocksmokers to make a video saying they "blovked off escape routes" ha ha, prepare for the dead coalition count to rise, just numbers,
God bless those guys man. i got an uncle over in iraq and my best friends brother is over there in afganistan. may all of our brave men and women come home safely.
And of corse with all of this quality news coverage before the fact I am sure the taliban will stick around to give the u.s . army a fair straight up fight?
This has been flagged as spam show
great strategy .. thanks for posting .. =)
antoniemcquire 3 months ago
Kick Ass or get out
behvac 11 months ago
ya cause thats army right? fucking dumbasses, try marines. not soldiers. you would think they would get it right.
thecarnageking 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have long thought of a way to taunt those foul minions of the vile Camel Merchant Cult until they become so cross that they will make a mistake, according to the commandment of Monty Python; and now I found the Egg of Columbus, unloosed the Gordian Knot and discovered the Philosopher's stone! It is Caliban the furry beast from The Tempest; and as the abomination in the play of Shakespeare, the Taliban a very furry, as they are banned from shaving their beards!
FireEyedMaidOfWar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The question is therefore: Can they also be enticed with drink to quite worshipping the Camel Merchant or at least be banished to some remote and desolate haunted island? They are as credulous as the furry monster of Shakespeare is for sure, so hencefore they shall be called the Caliban:
FireEyedMaidOfWar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CALIBAN Hast thou not dropp'd from heaven?
STEPHANO Out o' the moon, I do assure thee: I was the man i' the moon when time was.
CALIBAN I have seen thee in her and I do adore thee: My mistress show'd me thee and thy dog and thy bush.
STEPHANO Come, swear to that; kiss the book: I will furnish it anon with new contents swear.
FireEyedMaidOfWar 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TRINCULO By this good light, this is a very shallow monster! I afeard of him! A very weak monster! The man i' the moon! A most poor credulous monster! Well drawn, monster, in good sooth!
CALIBAN I'll show thee every fertile inch o' th' island; And I will kiss thy foot: I prithee, be my god.
TRINCULO By this light, a most perfidious and drunken monster! when 's god's asleep, he'll rob his bottle.
CALIBAN I'll kiss thy foot; I'll swear myself thy subject.
FireEyedMaidOfWar 1 year ago
I don't think this is a good stretegy. The best stretegy I think is that US and its allies gather all the Taliban leaders and celebrate "DRAW MUHAMMAD DAY". This will make talibans run away. Tell them that you are there for freedom of speech and democracy and that you have celebrated a similar day in US few months back and all muslims enjoyed it. : )
pakcannon 1 year ago
@pakcannon yeo...yah lol and u can take ur mum and sister to enjoy it to haha hows that sound???
MrTaGaB 10 months ago
execute those fucking monkeys
pigballs911 1 year ago
These dumb ass American terrorist have been there for almost ten years and they just trying to close the routes. lol!
ovaisreza 1 year ago
fucking idiots, Edwin Garcia is a Marine,not Army,stop fucking up the title! we worked hard for it!
develinangel 2 years ago
Islam can turn any prosperous country into a third world pisshole.
shoa31 2 years ago
Its not Islam, Its Zionism!! :)
artistdigital 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
darksun22light (18 hours ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam Reply The u.s would be nowhere without the Brits....better fighters & communicators, they could learn a lot for these men and women.
EXCUSE ME DUMBASS!!...THERE IS A REASON WHY U.S. IS THE ONLY SUPER POWER..,WE DONT NEED INSTRUCTION FROM THE BOTTOM OF A BOX THANK YOU
fokai1980 2 years ago
Do you guys not find it ironic that when the soviets invaded Afghanistan in 79- the U.S supported the muhajadeen who are now the taliban to fight against the Soviets and the Northern Allicance. Now we are on side of the Northern Alliance fighting against the taliban(muhajadeen)- simply amazing that's America for you.
rxnupe 2 years ago
@rxnupe
You make a good point but at the time we chose the lesser of two evils.
The US ended up crushing one of the evils let`s give our troops the support they need to win in Afghanistan!
GOGOGO CANADA OLYMPIC HOCKEY TEAM!!!
MapleMeadows 2 years ago
Comment removed
kfpatricio 2 years ago
The u.s would be nowhere without the Brits....better fighters & communicators, they could learn a lot for these men and women.
darksun22light 2 years ago
We made a big mistake toppling Saddam. For one, he didn't have a finger in 9/11. For two, he kept the terrorists in check in his nation, executing anyone who opposed his authority. There's a reason why he was so brutal, because he had to be in order to stay in power. Him and Bin Laden shared a mutual hatred.
stevensw 2 years ago
How will this offensive accomplish anything. The Taliban won't even have to fight. They can easily blend in with the population, which probably supports them, and then when we leave, it resorts to being a Taliban stronghold. Why would the people side with us when Opium is their lifeline. I'm curious if they are even aware of this. I think the intentions are good but it's just unwinnable.
stevensw 2 years ago
The war should have never started but we've got to clean up the mess Bush left us. We've got to go through it till the end. I bid good luck to our troops, both Americans, Britons, and the innocent civilians that will no doubt die in the midst of the battle.
PatriotIzzy 2 years ago
hmmm... Coalition forces killed five taliban and arrested many others. I thought this was a freakin' war? If we keep treating Afghanistan like a police action, we will surely regret it.
browneyes4 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fine. Each soldier down there costs 800.000€ in a sum while your families in calfornia are seen a bancrupt financial state household a rising crime and a rising drug consume and people paid with certificates of indebtedness. Good Job Boys. But dont worry - The money is not gone - Its just in the pockets of the war industry and theire owners. And they take just now theire sundowners in the caribbic. What are you fighting for? For nothing more than interests of gov. mil. and industies.
norbertmielke 2 years ago
MAY ALLAHS CURSE BE UPON THE US AND AFGHAN TROOPS, taliban arent good but a muslim dosent kill a muslim
AlhamdulillahVideos 2 years ago
Kill em all i hope we win is canada in this too?
Omega3chimp 2 years ago
I write all this hoping people whether in ALabama or Florida or Arizona know same dumb ass stores with too many junk things on shelves made in China--USA economy is wasted..Doomed!! GOd can't wait til 2012 hits The world;thank god!
deltaalpha21074 2 years ago
Did you hear the news about the British S.A.S taking out top 50 Taliban commanders in 2 weeks ready for the troops to go in?
so cool!
BoyMunkey08 2 years ago
10% unemployment rate is nothing
If they were smart enough maybe they would be able to make something worthy for this world, and make $
nuggert 2 years ago
This is just a practice drill for future suppression of U.S. citizens by the Obama regime when the U.S. economy collapses.
PaulRevere77381 2 years ago
nao é vida , viver assim
rhegysnildo 2 years ago
I hope the Taliban beats the Americans. America needs to stop trying to colonize the world and fix its 10% unemployment rate. Long Live the Mujahideen!
newtype64 2 years ago
Amen to that and I'm 65 miles from Shit hole Washington DC --does'nt matter if I'm in DC or Florida or Calif same shit everywhere same stores Home Depots/Wal Marts Best Buys Chinese shit and Fat skanks for girls now--USA is doomed!!! failure of Leaders and shit for leaders Uncle Tom OBAMA!!
deltaalpha21074 2 years ago
newtype: had the Taliban not overrun Afganistan (they are NOT Afghan) and allowed the place to be a training ground for their fellow cowardly Islamist murderers, NATO (NOT "the Amercans") wouldn't even be there. That means you're full of shit!
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
Actually the Taliban agreed to help us get rid of Bin Laden as long as we could provide proof that he did 9/1 however America had no proof and invaded anyway based upon SUSPICIONS. That is why what we did is ILLEGAL.
newtype64 2 years ago
Illegal by WHAT law? The Taliban took over Aghanistan and have been victimizing the people ever since. I suppose NATO is part of this "illegal" operation as well?
Why are nominal leftists forever calling anything they don't like "illegal"?
This only makes it apparent you lot have no clue about the law.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
It is illegal by international law. According to international law it is illegal to invade a country if the country did not declare war on you. Al Qaeda is not apart of the Afghan government, it is an organization that has no ties to the government. Just like the KKK has no affiliation with the US government. The Taliban came to power because the Afghans wanted them. The Taliban brought stability to Afghanistan. I have never heard an Afghan say they hate the Taliban, have you?
newtype64 2 years ago
al qaeda is not a part of the afghan government and neither are the taliban.
the afghans do NOT want the taliban.
saying "the taliban brought stability to afghanistan" is among the most retarded loads of crap I've seen on youtube.
International law has nothing to say about this matter, which makes it all the more amusing when dipshits like you quote it.
you obviously have no idea what is going on there. or here.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
How do you know the Taliban did not bring stability to the Afghanistan, is it because it does not go along with what CNN says? And yes the Taliban was part of the Afghani government. Of course international law is not important when America decides to break it. It is only important when other countries break it.
newtype64 2 years ago
I don't even watch CNN, sport, so stuff your stereotypes that keep you from having to think about what others say.
If you regard the destruction of centuries-old artifacts, regular public beatings of women, and burning of schools that dare teach girls as "stability" you're just about full of shit. Maybe a quart low.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
First of all the Taliban didn't destroy those artifacts anothergroup di which was denouncd by the Taliban. Where is your proof of regular public beatings and burning of girl schools? Did you hear this from an Afghani citizen? And even if these lies were true Amerca used to do all these things to blacks with in the lifetime of my grandparents which was not too long ago. Should someone have invaded America killing thousands of Americans in order to bring about change?
newtype64 2 years ago
The Taliban did that but it's amusing and informative to see you propagnadizing for them. Just WTF are you? "my proof" consists of years of reports from people in country of school burnings, acid attacks, and hijackings of busloads of people who were subsequently murdered.
America did what? I'm amazed at the lengths people will go to in order to attempt to equivocate. For one think pre-civil war America wasn't a training ground for religious killers. Also persecution of blacks was illegal.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
Just because a country had a civil war doe not give you a right to invade. Our invasion was still illegal. Your "proof" is still no justification to illegally invade a country. Hijackings and acid attacks are crimes; crimes happen in every country, it is still not justification to invade sovereign countries.
newtype64 2 years ago
sport, NATO is in afghanistan because it was and is a major training ground for islamists killers. How strange that you think international law protects countries involved in such activities.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
By the way ,I was not talking about pre civil war American blacks were being lynched and black churches were being burned after the civil war, by the KKK whom were religious killers that were not arrested. You call the Taliban religious killers but Never has an Afghan called them that. It does not matter you think about the Taliban it only matters what the Afghans think. Apparently they were not to bad because the Afghans hate Americans and they want America OUT.
newtype64 2 years ago
your apparent position, that the U. S. had no right to go into Afghanistan because crimes are committed in the U. S., is fairly silly.
it doesnt matter what YOU think, you don't know what Afghans have called the taliban, what do you think they call them when the taliban kidnap youung men and rape young women? is that an activity you defend? what does international law say about that?
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
1. NATO is sun by the U.S. and it broke internatinal law. Plain and simple. It is our foregin policy which caues all these attacks how many time do they haft to say that?
2.. You always talk aout the "attrocities" the Taliban commit yet the US government and the CIA do the exact same thing.
3. I get my information from Afghani sources. I rather get it from th people whom are being most effected by these policies.
4. PROVE they want the Taliban out. Did you talk to them?
newtype64 2 years ago
we dont blow ourselves up to kill a buncha girls in a school u fuck.
clingingtowhat 2 years ago
When did the Taliban blow themselves up to kill a bunch of school girls? Please have enough integrity to not resort to telling lies to justify your position.
American sanctions and indiscriminate bombing have starved and blown up more little girls any one.
newtype64 2 years ago
newtype, you're absolutely full of shit.
the talilban target little girls and hide behind them so we can't shoot back. so they think.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
what international law was broken
paulinotou 2 years ago
Its aganst international law to invade a country that has not declared war on you. Afghanisatn which was run by the Taliban never declared war on the United States. AlQueda is an organization that operated with in Afghanistan but it has no ties to the Afghan government so we can't attack them. Plus we had and still have no real evidence that Bin Laden was responsible. We only suspected that he did it.
newtype64 2 years ago
you said that al queda has no ties to the afgan goverment but in 911 the taliban gave refuge to al queda and defended and sheltered Suddam Hussein. yes the Suddam Hussein who admitted after denying many times that he was responsible for 911.
paulinotou 2 years ago
The United States also gives safe haven for white supremacist groups. Does that mean that the U.S. government is responsible when they commit acts of terror against minorities? And Saddam would have never been responsible for 9/11 because the Al Queda hates Saddam, because he is a secular leader that does not rule by the Shariah. He is consider as an apostate ruler.
newtype64 2 years ago
the US does not support the groups though. we have them cause its part of there freedom of speech/religion what ever. the taliban supplied and supported al queda and refused to help the US find Bin Laden.
paulinotou 2 years ago
The Taliban actually denounced the attacks and offered to help find Bin Laden. The only reason they did not hand him over is because we had NO PROOF he did it. This whole war is based upon a bunch of lies and HALF truths.
newtype64 2 years ago
Plus even if Saddam was responsible for 9/11 America has killed millions of innocent civilans. If any country is to threat to peace it is America.
newtype64 2 years ago
and no its al queda who threatened the peace. we simply in afganistan because al queda bombed us. the US doesnt mean to kill civilians but a war without civilian but not to kill them is unrealistic
paulinotou 2 years ago
You say Al Qaeda threatened the peace but there was NEVER ANY peace to begin with. This situation happened decades BEFORE 9/11. This situation started when we began setting up puppet regimes in the Muslim world, overthrowing governments, killing people through sanctions, supporting the Israelis and setting up military bases. We as Americans have brought this upon ourselves. Instead of admitting our wrongs we rather wage war on those who fight our tyranny.
newtype64 2 years ago
we werent overthrowing goverments or what ever you say. the muslim countries had free will to choose what they wanted to do. thats why suddam hussein was in power.
paulinotou 2 years ago
We do over throw governments. What do you think we are doing in Afghanistan right now? Did the Afghans tell us to do this? Who sold Saddam POISON GAS to kill off the rebels? Who overthrew the president in Iran and installed the Shah? Who funded the Ethiopians to invade Somalia? Who do you think keeps Mubarak in power? Who do you think put & keeps the Saudis power? We fund & prop up tyrants so they can serve Ameirca not their people. Then we want to blame Islam for their problems.
newtype64 2 years ago
first of all we attacked afganistan after 9 11.and last time i remembered we dont control somalia, and Iran. im pretty sure you knew that the US gave anthrax and other diseases. but not to use it to murder innocent people they were going to use it for medical research.right now you obviosly just trying to find things bad about the US and throwing it at me. you manage to show the bad side but nothing else. its okay to admit your country done wrong. but the US isnt as evil as as you make
paulinotou 2 years ago
Comment removed
newtype64 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We did attack Afghanistan after 9/11 but Afghanistan did not attack us and they agreed to help capture Osama. However we attacked anyway so that we can build a pipe line & install a NEW government. That is why we are killing the Taliban. We must kick out the old government in order to install a new PUPPET government. We did this in Iran by overthrowing theirdemocracy & installing the shah. We also did the same by funding the Ethiopian invasion of Somalia.
newtype64 2 years ago
um i never said we didnt attack afganistan after 911. and they at first were with us but after they werent.
paulinotou 2 years ago
Correct! At 1st the Afghans agreed to hand over Bin Laden but they wanted proof. They have the right to want proof of a crime before they hand over their citizens. However we only had baseless accusations with NO proof. Now as you know when you accuse a person of a crime the plaintiff has the burden of evidence. If the plaintiff cant provide evidence then you can't call the person guilty. America claims to have principals but when dealing with nonWesterners we all of a sudden forget our values.
newtype64 2 years ago
Bin laden said it himself he did it. he denied it the first few times than he admitted it. there are a few videos of it on you tube. he also tries to justify it.
paulinotou 2 years ago
1. Bin Laden didnt admit to 9/11. If he did he would probably be on the FBI list for 9/11. Look on the FBI list to check for yourself.
2. You can't invade a country to find one person. Imagine if an American killed 3 thousand people in another country. Would that country have the right to invade the United States and kill thousands of innocent Americans and overthrow our government to install one that was to their liking?
newtype64 2 years ago
no bin laden admitted to 9/11. and you can invade a country if the are hiding and supporting a group who attacked you country.
paulinotou 2 years ago
So then Afghanistan had the right to attack the US following the US bombings during the levinsky affair?
profanum88 1 year ago
yah.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
So then, if the 9/11 was an Afghan attack the
the US had no right to retaliate?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 i dont see where your going with this. yes we would have right to retaliate.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
Why? Can one retaliate on a retaliation?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 yah. where are you going. i dont see how that has to do with what we are talking about.
paulinotou 1 year ago
The US attacked Afghanistan in 1998, giving Afghanistan the right to retaliate.
IF 9/11 was an Afghan attack, then it was their right (as retaliation from the 1998-attack).
IF the US attacked Afghanistan as retaliation of 9/11, then they did retaliate on a retaliation.
Do you have the right to retaliate on a retaliation?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 i do not recall the US attacking afganistan in 1998. 9/11 wasnt a afgan/taliban attack. it was an al queda attack. and yes since al queda attacked the US so we attacked back. it doesnt even make a difference if they were attacking us because of something we did in 1998, they are still attacking the US so of course we are going to attack back.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
Look it up then. Clinton was trying to draw attention from the Lewinsky-affair so he bombed some villages in Afghanistan (and the UN sent a team to investigate, civilian villages and only civilians killed).
So why did you attack Afghanistan???
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 you just said he did it to draw attention away. you forgot to add that al qaeda was already trying to bomb us. they tried to assassinate clinton and already bombed us embassy in africa. we are kind of off topic dont you think.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
Im asking why you attacked in 2001.
What has al qaida to do with Afghanistan?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 well, you were trying to make it seem as if 911 was an afgan counter attack when really it was a terrorist organization who did the attack not afganistan. we attacked because al qaida is based in afganistan, that is where osama is and of course if you dont cooperate like the taliban we are going to attack you country, its as simple as that.
paulinotou 1 year ago
But the only al-Qaida-member in Afghanistan was Usama and the talibans offered to extradite him twice before you attacked.
Al-Qaida isnt now and has never been based in Afghanistan, it is mainly based in Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
I said that IF you were attacking Afghanistan as a retaliation for 9/11, then Afghanistan had the same right to attack the US (by the way 60 more countries has).
So what was the reason for the war?????
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the taliban was creating a safe haven for al quada in taliban. that is were they were mainly. and the taliban said they will put him on trial but thats all. we wanted to destroy al quada.
and just in case you forgot that the US is the only one attacking afganistan. a bunch of european nations are backing us up. i think Sweden is fighting too.
the US didnt attack taliban as a counter strike, they were just in the way.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
Are you just making this up as you go along?
Al Qaida was formed by the CIA to fight the russians in Afghanistan, it was composed of mainly Saudis and Yemenites. The Taliban has different politic and religious ideas. The Taliban wanted nothing to do with al-qaida, and especially not after al-qaida attacked their ally the US.
The talibans offered to extradite him.
The official US statement was that Afghanistan was behind the attack by "making the action to theirs".
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 al queda was formed by islamic radicals who just so happen to be supplied by the CIA. afghanistan isnt a US ally. you said that they have nothing to do with al quada. well that is a stupid thing to say. the taliban allowed al quada to train in afghanistan. there beleifs are also very similar.
are you making this up as you go along?
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
al-Qaida and the taliban doesnt share many beliefs. The Taliban originates from Pakistani islam and al-Qaida are Sulafists from Saudiarabia.
Al-Qaida doesnt have training-bases or anything like that, its an UNLINKED network, that means THEY DONT MEET, they dont talk, they dont take contact and so on.
You ARE just making shit up.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 no im not making this shit up. you are dumb because everyone knows that the taliban was supporting al qaida. everyone knows al quada was training and based at afganistan and the taliban allowed that.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
No one outside the US and some retarded fucks outside the US "knows" anything of that sort. Everey fucking one knows they arent even the same kind of muslims. And every one knows al-qaida is an unlinked network (invented by the CIA to fight the russians in Afghanistan) and as such they dont have any bases (al-qaida means "the base", its an ideological base) at all.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the CIA didnt start al quada they just supported them. go look it up al qauda was supported by the taliban. wow for all this talk i would of thought you would of knew that. oh wait you only look at things that will feed you hate towards the US so why dont i just end it here. i can see that this is an unstable argument and all you are doing is finding anything bad about the US and throwing it out of proportion or exagerating it.
paulinotou 1 year ago
@paulinotou
No, the CIA invented the hole idea, to make an indestructible organisation.
The mojahedin on the other hand was just supported, like later the taliban.
To say taliban supported al-qaida is like saying the US supports Iran, its so fucking ignorant that only americans buy it.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 fuck you suck my dick. go look it up. dont comment back cause you must be an idiot and we shouldnt have this argument. go america
paulinotou 1 year ago
NATO is independent, the idea that the U. S. controls it shows you to be a lunatic.
Prove the US and CIA do anything remotely like what the Taliban do. The taliban target civilians, our boys don't.
no doubt that you get your information from afghani sources - you think the taliban are afgan, that explains why you put forth their propaganda.
you haven't spoken to the afghans!
the proof would be that there was already a war between the taliban and the afghans before we sent our boys in
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
@soakupthesunman
So hove come more civilians die in Afghanistan since the US took power from the Taliban?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 because that's who the Taliban target, knowing there are many losers like you standing ready to blame the U. S. for it.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
But no one was ready to blame the islamic front (renamed to the Northern alliance by the US in september 2001) during the civil war?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 blame them for what?
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Talibans killing civilians. They didnt do that until they started fighting the US.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 you obviously have no idea. The "taliban" took over Afghanistan and began murdering indiscrimately, in the best tradition of the bolsheviks and maoists they are so closely allied with philosophically.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
So the Taliban was killing indiscrimately when the US supported them? Why did you support them then?
And if the taliban is closely allied with bolsheviks why was the movement formed in fight against a bolshevik regim??
Are you just making stuff up that you think sounds good? You dont have a fucking clue about the war your supporting, right?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the Taliban then were not the same as they are now I don't know what makes you think I supported them "then". Their philosophical link to Bolshevism doesn't mean they were "closely allied". They fought Bolsheviks; the USSR went into Afghanistan for reasons I'm not at all sure of. Similarly, I'm not at all sure the U. S. did the right thing by helping the Afghans to drive them out.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Yes, they have been the same the hole time, the US supported the taliban from the Soviet withdrawal until september 2001.
What is the philosophical link?
The USSR went into Afghanistan claiming the EXACT same reasons as the US does now.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the USSR went into Afghanistan claiming there were terrorist bases used to train jihadi queers to fly planes into buildings? where did you get this bullshit?
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
No, and neither does the US argue that thats the reason to the war in Afghanistan.
By the way, witch of the hijackers of 9/11 had been in Afghanistan?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the US indeed claims there were training bases in Afghanistan.
I didn't say any of the hijackers had been in Afghanistan.
Tell us just what are the "EXACT same reasons" the USSR went in as did the US?
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Yes, witch is stupid when al-qaida is an UNLINKED network, they dont have training bases.
Whats the connection between al-qaida and 9/11 then??
To help the elected government, to free the women, secure democracy and so on.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 al qaida have training bases in Afghanistan and Northern Iraq. The status of their links doesn't enter into it at all. 9/11 was done by Islamist lunatics and there is no need to establish a "proven in court" connection of any sort. These aren't bank robber or even drug smugglers, these are war crime conspirators. They have declared war on the West, not just on the U. S.
The USSR was going to secure democracy? Are you a lunatic?
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
al-Qaida doesnt use training bases, its an UNLINKED network, GOT IT THIS TIME?
And how the fuck could they have training bases in countries governed by the US?
And in fucking Kurdistan? Are you a complete moron? You have no clue what so ever about the region your talking about, have you?
Why did you attack Afghanistan and Iraq if some one else declared war on you?
No they werent and neither is the US, but they CLAIMED that their goal was to secure democracy.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 of course al qaeda uses training bases, you dont' even know what you're saying... "GOT IT THIS TIME"... al qaeda operatives trained in Northern Iraq and Afghanistan. you complete IDIOT, the bases were overrun and shut down by U. S. and coalition forces, THAT IS HOW WE KNOW THERE WERE TRAINING BASES! Your "unlinked" BS is just that... BULLSHIT.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
No its the HOLE IDEA with an UNLINKED organization, if they did they wouldnt be al-Qaida. You dont even know who the fuck your fighting in a war you dont know the reasons for, your the dumbest fucking people to ever walk the earth.
In northern iraq you say? You know that Saddam had no control of northern Iraq from 1991 an forward?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 oh, I see, they're "unlinked" because if they're linked they'r'e not al qaeda.
you idiot.
we're fighting the witless assholes who pretend to fight for islam but really are the descendants of Hitler's biggest supporters, certain MidEast arabs.
so you know al qaeda were training in N. Iraq, then. i didn't say anything about any control of that area.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Thats right, its like saying that the US is an islamic republic. Its just right out extremely ignorant. Only fucking americans believe that shit.
No they werent, thats Turkey making fun of american ignorance to get permission to go into southern kurdistan and kill some kurds.But if they did, wtf would that have to do with the war?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 who says the US is an islamic republic? al qaeda were training in N. Iraq and we found the airplane fuselages they were using. only leftist asshats believe the US went into Iraq for [whater harebrained reason the left pretend was the "pretense"]
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
People ignorant enough to say things like "the taliban supported al-qaida" or "al-qaida had training bases".
What fucking fuselages? If your making something up about 9/11 you should know that none of the hijackers had ever been to Iraq or Afghanistan.
Why did you go into Iraq?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the taliban did and do support al qaeda, and al qaeda had training facilities. you seem to be saying that al qaeda does nothing anywhere. that's quite daft.
the fuselages were in N. Iraq, you're quite ignorant and uninformed for someone who claims to be knowledgeable.
I didn't go into Iraq. The coalition did for a variety of reasons, not least that it is a strategic location and its gov't was corrupting the UN and financing terrorists of all descriptions.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
No you dumb fuck I say its an UNLINKED organization, thats whats makes them special. Every cell of the organization is completely self-sufficient and completely unaware of any of the other cells. Al-Qaida isnt the name of the organization (it has none) but the name of ONE cell, it means "The base" ie the ideological base.
How the fuck can you have a main enemy and go to war and not even know what the fuck it is??
You are the most ignorant people in history.
profanum88 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
So why didnt the US use those reasons when they attacked Iraq? Did the US LIE about the reasons for the war?
What was those fucking fuselages used for?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 you apparently have no idea of the reasons the US gave for going into Iraq, preferring the idiotic lefty spin on the issue. You pretend to be an expert yet don't know this simple fact?
"those fucking fuselages" were used for training terrorists ya dumb fuck.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Yes I know them very well, of some reason no fucking american seems to remember them. Your the only people in the world going willingly to war without knowing why.
What fucking terrorist? PKK? What did they use them for? Why the fuck would they go through the trouble of getting fuselages?
WTF would it have to do with any of your wars?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 I guess those fucking americans who don''t remember them were too busy fucking. most americans just go with the asshat nonsense put forth by the noisemakers about WMD or whatever. Do you actually think that every other country that went to war made sure all its people knew and agreed?
if you don't know about the fuselages, you know JACK SQUAT about this whole issue. you're just blowing smoke. WTF would you think the fuselages were for?
bum a quarter and buy a clue.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Every other country who got their people to support the war. The americans are the only people dumb enough to support a war and dont know why.
I have no fucking clue what they were used for. Training PKK-guerillas to hijack Turkish airplanes? Would be fucking stupid to train in actual fuselages, because you will most likely get caught either when optaining them or when using them.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 folks like you don't understand why the wars are happening... don't project your shortcomings onto others, expecially not a whole country. that just makes you look a fool. So you admit you have no fucking clue. that's what I have been trying to tell you all along. You have no knowledge whatsoever regarding any of this. FOAD
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Yes I know why the wars are fought. The funny thing is that the american population dont know why the wars are fought, and not even what their government used as pretences for the war, and still they support the wars.
I have no clue regarding the fuselages you made up, and you havent been able to answer.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the american population knows quite well why their boys are in Iraq and Afghanistan. That idiots on the anti-West left pretend otherwise prove nothing.
At least you admit you have no clue. WTF do you expect me to answer?
I made up nothing. You're making up this ridiclulous assertion that americans don't know why wars are fought. Prove that shit? You can't!
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
I have proven it, you cant fucking answer.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 your ignorance does not compel my remedy.
you obviously have no idea.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
And neither do you.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 your ignorance of the fuselage training facilities found in Iraq is proof of your know-nothing bullshit. Your meaningless snivelling that "americans don't know why they went to war" is just you projecting your own witless nonsense on others.
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
You being unable to answer what the fuck the fuselages has to do with anything what they were used for, and why the fuck yur at war for is my proof, dumbass.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 the fuselages were used to train rag-head faggots involved in hijackings, ya completely stupid fuck, NATO is in Afghanistan because the place was a fucking wasteland of hyuman misery where the local gov't was overwhelmed by world-class assholes who were destroying the place. the coalition is in Iraq because it was a lawless backwater corrupting the U. N. and sponsoring terrorist killers
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
What ragheads was that? The only terrorists to have trained in Iraqi Kurdistan is the PKK, and they are fighting Turkey.
Well those world-class assholes were supported and founded by the US, why didnt you just stop supporting them so they would lose the war?
Iraq wasnt lawledd before the US went there, they had no say-so in the UN and they werent sponsering terrorist. What terrorists would that had been?
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 so now you admit you know terrorists were training in Iraq.
It's so fun when "world class assholes" like you try to blame the U. S. for anything. Iraq was as fucking MESS you lying shit monkey! The U. S. did NOT go in alone. Iraq was corrupting the U. N. with the oil for food scam, how can you say Iraq had "no say so"? And they were giving money to the familes of Palestinian suicide bombers!
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
@soakupthesunman
Yes of course, terrorists supported by the US who fought Saddam and who fought Turkey (witch was why Turkey did not let the US attack from the north).
Iraq had the highest living standard in the region.
Oil for food was an american plan to starve the Iraqis, thats the reason why they hated you. If it hadnt been for oil for food the Iraqis might have seen you as liberators.
Yes they started supporting Palestine after the Israeli terror attack of 1981.
profanum88 1 year ago
@profanum88 your every post is a rancid stew of blatant lies, stupidity, revisionism, and trolling bullshit, mixed with stupidity. eat it!
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@profanum88 the US indeed claims there were training bases in Afghanistan.
I didn't say any of the hijackers had been in Afghanistan.
Tell us just what are the "EXACT same reasons" the USSR went in as did the US?
soakupthesunman 1 year ago
Your "proof" is based upon American sources. Do you honestly think Americans are going to not be biased? America needs every excuse they can find to justify their illegal occupation. Funny how Americans will never really show how AFGHANS FEEL ABOUT THE SITUATION. Maybe because they will tell what is really going on. Maybe they will say that the acid attacks and hajackings are sterotypes that make up less than 1% of the crimes in the region.
newtype64 2 years ago
lose this stupid assertion than anyone who defends the americans gets their info from "american sources".
you must have heard of the internet, you're using it to prove you're a dupe of the world's most uncaring fanatics.
You're a liar, Americans show EXACTLY how Afghans fell about the situation, they want the Taliban out! that's why NATO works with Afghan troops.
NATO is NOT occupying Afghanistan, it's not an illegal presence no matter how often dolts like you toot the "illegal" horn.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
sorry to break the news to you but during the time of the taliban regime there was a bloody civil war with more casualties than the whole afghan war... but i know that you wont even register what im sayin
BERN1EMAC 2 years ago 3
the muslim will die and it is time for muslim to go to hell LOL
tampa50man 2 years ago
Your countrymen are fightin alongside muslims man!
Brandywellbhoy 2 years ago
yes i know LOL
tampa50man 2 years ago
Brandy, that is what we would expect in a country that is largely moslem. the problem is that Islam hasn't done a good job of controlling its stupid useless young men.
In the West we keep such folks busy by making them politicians.
soakupthesunman 2 years ago
War is waste of time as Real terrorists are in Washington DC... just like the movie shooter --all set up 9/11 wake up grunts you joined cause there were no REAL JOBS desperate thats all..I'm going to have nice Margarita while you drink that piss water in Afghanistan BYE!
deltaalpha21074 2 years ago
Your stupid.
Muffinman3670 2 years ago 3
Not as dumb as bunch of kids who waste time to join military that serves no real purpose as US military is only industry LEFT in USA....reason so many join is they know NO JOBS but fuckin Wal-Mart FAt ass skanks in charge there.
deltaalpha21074 2 years ago
All I can say is, 9 year war!
NorthGeorgiaPipe 2 years ago
This is only an action for the cameras...seems that the war on TV is more real than the one on the ground. the Taliban are not stupid enough to fight fix battles. All you guys in the media...just...carry on with your work. you're doing a great job. Long live the free press!:))
alexandrumusat 2 years ago 2
Taking military pressure off gihadists in their home regions is not a good idea. Neither is a Vietnam-style escalation to prop up a corrupt regime. The only answer left is for NATO to be the harasser of the Taliban element, not the occupier of Afghanistan -- saw a cool site; Balkingpoints ; awesome satellite view of earth
reg373 2 years ago
these wars in muslim countries are a waste of time and human life. we will never win the hearts or minds of muslims. it is not in their physical constitutions to befriend us or anyone not muslim. let's get the hell out asap.
quepasany1 2 years ago
even if they get all the taliban
new people who have the same beleives will take there place
so you cant win
its like the war on drugs for every dealer they catch theres another 10 apear
and the war on drugs is 30 years old and drugs are easyer to get now than they were years ago
policematrix 2 years ago
1000 crazy Muslims War over! The troops can come back to a beautiful economy and find out their Job and woman was taken by Jesus and his brother Jose....at the same time ....Damn that tequila was strong!
GodKillerAtheist 2 years ago
Mr.Garcia looks relaxed and mellow.
I would also be looking forward to searching mud huts for hashish and opium.
MuammarAlGathafi 2 years ago
good luck TO all Of dem ..FUCK ARAVS
JOS3EMMANUEL 2 years ago
So Marjah is where a 1000 Islamic Nuts are. So how many predators does it take to obliterate Marjah? After obliterating Marjah from the air then send in the tanks, followed by the infantry. Where those leaving sufficiently searched to make certain that they weren't key Taliban or Alqaida members? Good luck US Soldiers, US Marines, & Afghan Soldiers. Hopefully it crushes this Afghani resistance. Bush&Dick dodged the Afghanistan War. Commander & Chief Barack Obama will now wrap it up for America.
BertGriffin88 2 years ago
DID Anyone else notice the U>S ARMY at 0:10 ?
mrsushi152 2 years ago
@mrsushi152 fail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111 i did
fireteambrovo 2 years ago
@mrsushi152 yeah
JOS3EMMANUEL 2 years ago
We have ALL seen History Chanel documentarys. Thos folks, IS PROPAGANDA. The Taliban had warnings... they are long gone, entreched, or setting up IED's... the Russians lost battle there, so will America... new vietnam bitches, just that the Afghanistan has too many mountains for these cocksmokers to make a video saying they "blovked off escape routes" ha ha, prepare for the dead coalition count to rise, just numbers,
12GaugeLosAngeles 2 years ago 2
God bless those guys man. i got an uncle over in iraq and my best friends brother is over there in afganistan. may all of our brave men and women come home safely.
randypicklesanchez 2 years ago
i think it is the taliban that has blocked off our escape route from afghanistan
kissmybuttdimple 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
kissmybuttdimple 2 years ago
How heavy are those back packs?
nobleheight 2 years ago 2
Taliban: term used to describe anyone your country dislikes for torture purposes....
The Taliban is weak...but America needs an excuse to go to war....
Gotta make that money, and secure that Poppy.
treid100182 2 years ago
go home stupid gringo
carlosdavids777 2 years ago
And of corse with all of this quality news coverage before the fact I am sure the taliban will stick around to give the u.s . army a fair straight up fight?
lol........we'll see?
1019drummer 2 years ago
They look like Sherpas with guns.
BonScottAC 2 years ago