Added: 2 years ago
From: ouivalerie
Views: 28,733
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Yes biblical accounts from rabbi s and old prophets of accounted truths describe giants that once exsisted thousands of years back . The orig. Account of fallen angels is true they were large in size and existed.

  • Fake Pics: the pics are super-imposed from the orig mastedon pre historic elephant the large giant look of human skeleton was super imposed from photoshop from snoop. Com and the actual pic is from Cornell U Of an prehistoric elephant

  • Honestly you cant exactly say its fake because,well yea in modern society we are able to create believable pictures but yet we arent used to seeing unnatural things so we easily claim it as fake because we have always lived in a "normal world". Yea it may be fake but then again we dont know if it is exactly fakemaybe there is another world or big secret and the government is just trying to cover it up so we dont freak out. Who knows nowadays real and not real is all mixed up so we cant be sure

  • It would be a blow to evolution because in the Bible it tells of the noah. And the great flood. God destroyed the world with the flood because of a race of humans who were giants. They were corrupting everything. This race of giants were half human and half angel. How could we have evolved if every thing was destroyed. Since everything was destroyed. How are we the way we are now?

  • If any of these(I know this is a fake) are real. It proves that giants were on the earth long ago. That would be a major blow to the theory of evolution.

  • @masterpiece714 Why would it be a blow to evolution?

  • I knew that was fake but what about the others u see all the time of similar size in a square ditch in what appears to be a desert

  • @Dayy05 giants arent all the same size...just like people

  • This is fake. No I am not playing it was a photo compatition. But there are "real" ones but this is not one.

  • Maybe this is photo shop, but there were giants long ago. It's recorded in Genesis. The entire climate of the earth was different long ago and there was more oxygen and air pressure. The giants may have lived for hundreds of years.

  • There is nothing left after a 3000 year old burial..not a bone not even the sacrem. PHA-LEEZ. Wake up.

  • reed yer bibble

  • Why is it all the bible thumpers are so quick to accept this photo as proof of Goliath or something,I got bad news for you this is nothing more then a photo shop entry done in 2002 for Archaeological Anomalies photo contest.Worth1000 asked people to make the best photos with photo shop for this contest Google it it is all there.I am sure it did give judges a hard time in picking the winner but all photo's like the one shown, where for that contest nothing more no bigger story nothing.:)

  • this was photo shop but ya check out what DETpower said

  • Hoax!!! Or tinsky whinskly researchers.

  • Most of the photo shop images have made the rounds. The original research is never broadcast on u-tube because the researchers like to keep it to themselves write their books and make money.

    Well, not me... My videos show crystal clear that giants 7 to 12 feet high have been reported by major news papers and science journals. Skeptics like to dismiss all evidence as hoaxes, but this is a white wash. Real substance lies at the bottom of this mystery.

  • good work

  • Look up Klaus Dona... allot of good info.

  • why is it the same stupid picture ?dont you think if it was real they would have taken more pictures?

  • Pretty interesting. But there's been at least a few cases of giant human skeletons where the creators have come out saying it was a hoax all along.

  • Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

    Deuteronomy 3:11

    11 For only Og the king of Bashan was left of the remnant of the Rephaim. Behold, his bed was a bed of iron. Nine cubits was its length, and four cubits its breadth, according to the common cubit. A cubit was about 18 inches or 45 centimeters

    4m x 1.8m

  • From National Geographic website:

    "Blogs, emails, and even a newspaper have used this "photograph" to back up reports that the National Geographic Society had discovered an ancient race of giant humans. But the skeleton image is actually a digital collage of three different photos. A Canadian illustrator created it in 2002 for a photo-manipulation contest."

  • its already been verified as hoax. it is not true.

  • Yah, that makes way more sense.

  • It's unreasonable to say that scientist would cover something like this up. Scientist (the people, not profession) excel by finding and writing about new things, someone who could find solid evidence that evolution was incorrect, or there were giant humans would be a scientific hero.

  • real or not it's difficult imagining a huge human of that size

  • I'm afraid Mr Suntour is right, for these pics...

    they 're from a photoshop contest....Obviously this doesn't mean that all the other evidence are an hoax...Our senses seize just a small part of the reality.

  • you ignorant fool how could they be fake!? what everyone's just lying? get a clue, scientist has been wronge before you idoit

  • Nu 13:33

    And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.

    2Sa 21:20

    And there was yet a battle in Gath, where was a man of great stature *, that had on every hand six fingers, and on every foot six toes, four and twenty in number; and he also was born to the giant.

    They really existed.

  • why u quotin that trash that fight was fixed the stone was guided when u understand the nature of bein a accomplished warrior u understand the virtue an sentiment that lies behind that power to say goliath was a monster would not be true victorys cannot be acheived by superficialness hence is size an look how david turned out he never learned the game there he wasn allowed more over he couldn he never had the heart of a brother i use to go to church but it fell apart learin about unfair battles

  • Dude! Ever hear of 'PUNCTUATION'?!

    And 'superficialness' is not a word.

  • checc this out gay head connatation never used one

  • Comment removed

  • of course they are fake other way everybody would be aware of this

  • The image was created for a Worth1000 photoshop contest by a member named Ironkite. It became so famous that it was featured in a National Geographic article.

    For proof:

    1. Google search "giants by ironkite"

    2. Click on the 2nd link

    3. See his photoshop entry.

  • I'm glad to see somebody knows those pics are fake. It's truly mind-boggling to see how many people out there have put together videos with these same images, loudly asserting that they're real. It seems some people are just so eager to believe certain things that their critical thinking skills go right out the window.

    On a completely different tangent, that's nice music. Who's the artist?

  • curiously, the "scientific" community promulgates its own imaginary creatures and panders them off to those who consider themselves critical thinkers. we've all seen "the latest missing link" in National Geographic a million times, frolicking across the tundra with it's family--all based on a couple questionable bone fragments. humans are suckers, whether educated or not, "religious" or atheists. orthodox science does have many reasons to cover up truth that is contrary to pet theories, though.

  • I agree that the mainstream of the scientific community has become a dogmatic orthodoxy of its own, which exhibits religious fervor in its hostility to new data which challenges the received wisdom.

    However, I have to wonder which "latest missing links," specifically, are you referring to?

  • FormerlyFlightsuit- that was graciously said...i'm pleasantly shocked! i find few if any evolutionists or atheists (which might not even describe you) who can admit what you just did.

    i really had no specific "missing link" claim in mind, tho i think "Ida" is the latest (Google commemorated it)--i was referring to the pattern itself of realizing the currently hailed "missing link" doesn't work, "finding" another one more suitable, selling the public on it, finding out IT doesnt work, etc.

  • Creationists aren't the only ones who have issues with the mainstream of the scientific community. Me, I'm one of those kooks who's interested in ancient astronauts, cryptozoology, and various other things. It's funny, actually, how the ancient astronaut crowd would seem to be at odds with creationism, because we think humanity is much older, as opposed to much younger, than the conventional model suggests.

    And yet, both camps are scorned for raising questions about human origins.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more