Added: 2 years ago
From: inlookingout
Views: 1,606
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • will gays make the US military more effective and successful? Or will gays cause the US Military to re-gress like Britain, France and Germany's have encountered or the past 20+ years? I hope no one is killed or maimed because of this new distraction. Odd and unusual quote of the Day: "I've served with homosexuals since 1968." ADM Michael Mullenhead. Too bad the Chairman is more focused on social engineering tharather than destroying Al Qaida. Thanks Mike!

  • Go to the center for military readiness' web site for a clear understanding of how military officers feel about DADT. It will clear up some of the questions some of you have about DADT.

  • I didn't hear the U.S. military complaining when the British military among others joined our forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, a military that has openly gay men and women fighting alongside our own. Where was the lack of cohesion and morale then?

  • what I don't get about this STUPID policy is that ANYONE can use it as an excuse to run away from battle. Anyone can simply claim to be gay and get out.

  • Toxic is an enigma. He speaks intelligently in some cases and then makes ignorant comments like, 'if the military tolerates sex perverts, AIDS will flourish." I am beginning to think Toxic is actually Dick Cheney, slumming around on You Tube. Toxic, you are 30 years out of date where AIDS is concerned. you are 50 years out of date where Mental Disorders are concerned. Are you one of those guys who thinks cavemen and dinosaurs lived at the same time because you saw it on the Flintstones?

  • They need to be closeted. Why open the military up to being sued for "discrimination"? Nothing positive comes from such a negative policy change. Why must we appease the sodomites? Let them change to adapt to the military. Let them adjust. Sex is private.

  • Consider that homophobes, racists, and bigots can be very disruptive to morale and unit cohesiveness in the military. Each situation needs to be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. A blanket policy of dont ask, dont tell that coincidentally creates institutionalized closeting of gay servicemen seems, at least, unfair, unethical, and unenlightened. For military officers to suggest otherwise seems to bring into question the leadership and the professionalism of our military generally.

  • I see so 40 years of feminism, lesbianism, and homosexuality have so weakened us morally within that we just don't care anymore? They have worn down your resistance? Aren't you a trained fighter and killer when necessary? How have they demoralized you? The military tolerates sex perverts now? Great now AIDS can flourish.

  • If this evil happens it is because good men of honor never tried to stop it. The military represents America, Americans, and American values. Family values not gay family values.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne The military represents American values. A percentage of Americans are gay. What family doesn't have a gay member in it? Take a look at your family Toxic. Clearly, in the near future, you are the uncle that no one will be allow to talk about.

  • Recruitment will decrease and respect for the institution will flounder as they betray their conservative Republican principals to appease peogressivist Democrat sodomites. Why is our country proud to appease these sodomites? It doesn't matter the culture war was lost.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne "Recruitment will decrease" - first, hand in your Psychic Friends Network employee card. They filed bankruptcy years ago. Second, for those of US (not you) who WENT to bootcamp and showered and slept with gay recruits next to us, we discovered boot camp is a cross section of America. We had rich/poor, black/white, jews/christians, gay/straight. We all got hair cuts and were told we're equally worthless. At graduation, we were told we were now worth something. We were Marines.

  • Elections have consequences and so our great American military dominance is no more. We elected a social Marxist engineer. Now we will never be able to stem the floodgates of homosexuality. We are one step closer to outlawing heterosexuality. Thank you very much.

    Government's audacity establishing quota for public employers. What employer s don't want to hire gays and women? Who cares that some bureaucrat in Washington thinks there are behind the times? It's their company. They hire them.

  • The female senators seem to think that if we have criminals that those laws should be repealed. This isn't just with homosexuality but it also ties in with drug decriminalization and amnesty for illegals. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

  • That's quite presumptuous. This is not some foregone conclusion. The military simply will not yield to these far left zealots.

    If the military does not stand for morality and honor it will be undeserving of any respect for being yet another casualty in the culture war. Giving homosexual advocates guns to enforce homosexuality is a bad idea.

  • Gays and lesbians are going to serve in the future? Not when it is against military policy they won't.

  • You are right. Military regs are about to be changed you retard.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne

    homosexuals served in the military prior to Don't Ask Don't Tell, homosexual serve in the military under DADT, and homosexuals will continue to serve in the military when the rule prohibiting open homosexuals is repealed (and it will be).

  • @RottingintheMidwest We have appeased them too much. The military forces no ojne to be dishonest. They choose to be dishonest. If they have such a problem with the policy then they should not serve. We are a nation of laws. We don't defend criminals and blame others for forcing them into criminality. That is bullshit. This is not a civil rights issue. The military does not exist for social engineering. The military exists to fight wars. Our values are timeless.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne 'if they have a problem with policy, then they shouldn't serve." Many do not serve because of the policy. So straight marines are already serving with gay marines who pretend to have a girl friend in order not to be suspected of being gay. Gay marines act dishonestly by laughing at gay jokes and boasting about their sexual exploits while on liberty (off duty). DADT doesn't stop gay marines from serving. It stops gay Americans who would enlist were it not for the DADT policy.

  • The military does not "tolerate" dishonesty. The military forces dishonesty one no one. Only the dishonest choose dishonesty. Morality is black and white otherwise we end up in slavery appeasing the enemy. Oh virgins aren't queer. Virgins have simply been rejected by mate selection. We like them turn that anger and hate over rejection into fighting power.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne seems to be asleep at the keyboard. His fingers are typing, but his brain isn't engaged. Common Toxic. You took the Ambien over an hour ago. Its time you went to bed. So morality is black and white and slaves appease the enemy. Oh virgins aren't queer, just rejected by male selection. Its like reading alphabet soup. All the words are there. They just don't make any sense. Honestly Sarah. You made more sense during that interview with Katie Couric.

  • @RottingintheMidwest Values don't change they would be useless if they did. We must not be bipartisan, for bipartisanship seeks only to appease the enemy. Why should we appease sodomites who cannot keep their sexuality private? Why give them special rights because they are so mentally ill they think that sex is a public matter? It only embarrasses the military and demoralizes them.

  • @RottingintheMidwest So we are to "tolerate" dishonesty in the military? Why should a respectable conservative Republican organization be forced to become a radical progressive Democrat organization? This will weaken us. The no gays policy works just fine. There is no compelling reason to change it. I have heard no argument that it will improve fighting wars.

  • @ToxicMoronOne

    i will say it again...

    the public is quickly moving to be supportive of homosexual civil rights. it is inevitable that the the near future will see gays openly serving in the military (and they are not making their non-chosen sexuality public any more or any less than heteros) and same sex marriage will be legally recognized. This WILL happen whether you like or not.

  • Is the public in the military? Values are timeless Sir. If values were mutable they would be meaningless Sir. Values are never up for vote.Sex is private. I don't expect that to ever change. Would General Washington approve of sodomites in his military? I think not.

  • @ToxicOdiousOne "you have heard no argument that it will improve fighting wars". I suspect you could fill a library with what you "haven't" heard. You need to expand your commentators beyond Glen Beck, Bill O'Reily, Ann Culter and Rush Limbaugh in order to hear the arguments that are supported by the Top Military Leadership at the Pentagon. They are behind it. Stop being un-patriotic and get behind the policies of our military leadership.

  • I wonder if any of those retired military who are against gays in the military are black or female? Probably not--they were each the target of these 19th Century condescending and degrading attitudes too. These brave men and women are putting their lives on the line for this country! They deserve RESPECT, not this kind of bullsh*t!

  • @scrubjay93 You racist sexist.

  • Well this is what happens when to many of us don't get out and vote. Seems the old bats are still under the bridges just waiting to bite anyone who try to progress in life. The nut wings are the most hateful group I have ever seen. Vote every one of the right wing bastards OUT.

  • "Progress"? So you're a dirty progressive are you? "Progress" meaning a radical lefist agenda benefiting non white males?

  • Toxic is a great name for you: You almost got it right, but not quite If PROGRESS means leftist than I am a proud one. But there is no question that the dirty part belongs to YOUR ilk. Surely you know the type, OLD, SOUR, wanting to take the country back fathers raped their daughters and nothing could be done about it. When all the wives tales were thought of as truth.

    The KOOK wing-nut-Repubs Limbaugh Hannity Beck Palin are all obstructionists

    I believe in the future Don't live in the past

  • You believe in impractical pie in the sky ideals or in some dystopian socialist matriarichal nanny state where there are no adults because everybody has the same rights as children. Citizens are criminals. We are all children of the State. I don't want your version of the future.

    I don't care about rape. It's a female problem.

  • I fail to see what correlation you answer has to with this forum. The vid is about DADT and there is a group of people who would like to serve and if necessary die for this country.

    Some of these people have exceptional skills we need badly. Latest polls indicate 66% of the public agrees. It's time we get out of the dark ages. The right wing-nut-teabagger-hillbillies would like to take us there again.

  • Social engineering is not the purpose of government or the military. This is politicizing our national security once again. The CIA director has told us to expect another terrorist attack. Gee, I wonder why. Obama has forgotten about 911. This is his latest dismantling of Bush's security policies. Will it keep us safer? Safer from Iran? Ahmadinejad hates homosexuals and you want an military full of them? You give them more reasons to hate the Great Satan. Is that wise? They are enriching uranium

  • Did it ever dawn on you that there are between 65T and 85Thousand Gay folks already serving in the military at any given time? Did it ever dawn on you that the US and Turkey are the only members of Nato that have this knuckle dragging law? All the other countries including Israel report no problems with Gays in the military.

  • Incrementalism? We already "tolerate" closeted gays so that means we should "tolerate" open gays? That does not follow. I don't print my sexuality on my business cards. Why are you asking for such silliness? It will ruin the institution's reputation.

  • Why are we turning into a failing European nation? Work to Europe if you love it so much. Stop your Marxist strategy to fundamentally transform society.

  • Every time you bone heads cant think of something to call some one you call them a Marxist, communist, Lennonist, or some other fool hardy name. European you say? Funny their economies have recovered from our fool hardy mistakes, but the party of NO votes to keep Americans in the dumpster. They could give a crap they have their cushy jobs and WE are paying their INS. and salary's, while some here can't afford to even go to a DR. Vote the right-wing-bastard-TEABAGGERS-­out.

  • @johnnyohness America is dead. Expect the funeral to follow shortly. We should have a funeral for freedom as it too is dead. We grieve we learn the new rules and e move on.

  • Why is it government's province to tell employers who to hire. I thought qualifications were a good enough standard. You can't enforce diversity. If employers don't want to hire gays they don't have to. If employers don't want to hire women they don't have to.

    66% is hardly 80%. 66% is a D+ that's a failing grade.

  • If 66% is a failing grade what possibly would 33% be. Seems when you folks run out of facts you invent new ones. So this is politicizing national security? Maybe Harry Truman did the same when he said enough with treating African Americans the same way. Who cares about Ahmadinejad, besides maybe some of those Arabic translators we forced out will save us. If we are the great Satan thats our doing not his

  • 33% would also be a failing grade. It's an F duh. Harry Truman made a positive change. Allowing women was a mistake. No all change is for the better. The road of good intentions often leads back to slavery. That's what I am saying if we let gays in we will look more like the Great Satan.

  • I think its funny that the senators that are against the repeal are from traditionally segregated states such as Arizona, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia...gee am I not surprised... they felt the same way about "Negroes" in the military...we must SAVE American blood shed on the battle fields from the contamination of the darkies and homos! lol give me a break

  • So being open as to who one is = homosexual acts.

    We really need to get these ancient homophobes who believe in a cloud-residing magic skydaddy out of office and replace them with people who actually live in the 21st century.

  • @WellConditioned You mean homosexual activists who want to overhaul America for Cuba?

  • @WellConditioned If you love Cuba so much go live there. Stop trying to transform America into Cuba.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more