"crysis physics destruction break jungle shoot kill explosion blow up blood killing fun cool graphics cg hd high definition helicopter chopper branches trees breaking fire burn PC video game gameplay art"???
as Agentmass says RFG does have more realistic physics when it comes to building destruction. The devs hired actual building designers to help them make buildings with proper support amongst other stuff. If you've actually played it and have messed up a building you can stand near it and hear creaks and groans from the stressed structural support, sometimes a little dust may fall from where it's failing, and sometimes they spontaneously collapse. The devs have funny stories about makin it
@iSOBigD Have you ever played Red Faction Guerilla? Cuz I would say that kicks the crap out of Crysis physics (as long as graphics don't count as physics, cuz we know who wins there).
@iSOBigD If Crytek, and Geo-Mod 2.0 (for destruction) was combined, it would have the best destruction ever. Maybe, just maybe... Euphoria (GTA 4, RDR, Star Wars), Crytek, and Geo-mod 2.0 combined, making the best physics engine ever made.
u must be fucking sick if u think that RFG have better physics than crysis lol...
Red Faction guerilla looks like lego and there is nothing realistic - buildings are falling like lego constructor, graphics is shit, i guess gameplay also is shit(from gameplay vidoes it looks like it's shit)
Red Faction 3's physics do seem nice, but keep in mind it's coming out many years after Crysis. Also, it's coming out on consoles first so graphically it won't even be close to Crysis, which came out in 2007.
Graphically, I expect it to be a few years behind Crysis and more on par with that other game where you can dig tunnels and deform the ground with grenades. (Something Magic Carpet did back in 1994!)
well you cant deform the landscape but in red faction 3 you can take a truck run off of a bridge and crash into a building and youl be inside the building puoduh dont you think thats cool?
you know that shack you blew up @ 0:31 try this some time there are claymore mines mounted on that little mound right across from that shack one of those mines if you shoot it will completey destroy everything around it way outside of the normal radius i think its a bug but its funny it will make your pc lag like hell though
ok, i got a question, I have win xp, a 8800GTX, and a quad core 2.4GHz intel (I know, intel sux, cant be helped). I ran crysis at maxed settings (High, since its XP) and when you shoot the trees they only break into chunks about a foot long, but my friend said he could shoot them into tiny bits with his vista/DX10 rig, and even after getting the dx10 .dlls and doing the very high hack thing i cant get his performance. Any help?
Physics are always enabled. From the options menu, you can set them to high or whatever, based on how fast your system is, but the game always has physics.
Yup, that's how SLI works. You need two of the same NVIDIA cards for that. Although you're better off buying one newer card than two 9600GT cards. Cards that cost double as probably more than twice as fast.
Cards with "600" at the end are mid-range. Cards with "200" or "400" are low end and cards with "800" are high end. The 9600GT is newer than the 8800GT but is also slower.
Well you have a 8800 tell me. How long does the card last until it overheats and shuts down your PC. I have heard a lot about these overheating problems
That's never happened to me, and I have the original model with the small fan. The temperature does get pretty high, to over 80 degrees, but for others it goes over 90. I have two huge case fans (36cm and 25cm) and a decent CPU fan that blows air out the back of the case (Zalman 9500). If you don't have good cooling, yours might overheat.
BUT, all newer 8800GT cards have bigger, quieter fans so overheating is not a problem for any newer versions. Look at pics before buying the card to check.
If I had to pick between the 8800GT or 9800GT, I'd go with the 8800GT cause it costs a lot less and it's only a tiny bit slower. If you have about $200 to spend though, get the Radeon HD4750. It's the best card for the money right now.
radeon???.. meh Im not gona trust an ATI probably never its hard enough understanding geforce graphics cards also guy look at this watch?v=C3yNfTIQa0o I think im fine. but thanks anyways
Well, you're making a bad choice then. I'm recommending what's best right now for the money. The best fast cards for the money today are the AMD HD3750 ($200) and 3780 ($300). The 3870X2 is the fastest card currently out although it costs more, of course. Getting anything from NVIDIA for over $200 would be a bad choice.
Also, the 9600GT does NOT run Crysis on high well, let alone very high. Trust video card reviews, not 320x240 Youtube videos. Read some 9600GT reviews before buying it.
I don't think you can really play any games with a Maxbook Pro...World of Warcraft and some Mac ports might run, but other than that, the Macs are crap for games, even the really expensive ones.
The gravity gun was in other games and mods before HL2 came out. Also, what other cool guns does it have? Can you modify any of its weapons to fit your playing style? I love HL and HL2, but they're completely linear games where as Crysis isn't. Now I like the striders and those little striders, but the human (Combine) clone enemies are nowhere near as nice as the much smarter Crysis human enemies. They're much more fun to play against in Crysis.
Well, I guess it boils down to the matter of preference. I played through both games (game series in case of HL), and I just happen to like HL more. Also, there is a certain degree of linearity in Crysis. You can't go back (especially in later parts of the game), and the side-to-side freedom of movement is present, but not well enough to call the game non-linear. Now, if we were talking STALKER... That's an example of non-linearity.
BTW, Combine humans in HL2 are not cloned, they are converted.
What I meant is they're exactly the same character model. They pulled the ol' "they have helmets on but really they're all different" trick...but there's very little variation in the human combine units. In Crysis at least they have different heads and lots more body variation too. Plus, they look insanely good, even up close.
Yes, yes, you're right. But don't forget that HL2 is 3 years older than Crysis, which is a lot. Also, take a look at HL2:Ep2 characters - don't they look nice? Oh, and BTW, Crytek can't beat Valve at facial animation, which is kinda sad.
Well, Valve does have some good animators (I especially enjoy the TF2 animations). Crysis faces look much more realistic though thanks to much better modeling, texturing and the use of sub-surface scattering. And also, Valve tends to focus a lot on faces and completely neglect character bodies so they look pretty terrible in all HL2 episodes. In Crysis, everything from the smallest rock to the biggest enemy looks great. HL2 has mostly nice character faces and everything else is flat and blurry.
love the vid, game looks awesome. I thought all the talk of crysis was all hype... till now, have got the same video card, am waiting for the q9450 to come out... if i can wait, when i saw your F.A vid of the megalith a while back it sold me on the q6600, never know, looks real slick in this.
One reply would have been enough. :) Most games that need more than 1GB actually use about 1.1GB, including Crysis. It rarely goes near 2GB, let alone 4. Also, Vista uses a lot more memory by default compared to XP, so just because Vista easts half your memory doesn't mean the game uses it. Anyway, the more the better, but 4GB or more is useless for games today.
what do you mean 4 GB or more is useless for games today id think that if you had 4 gigs of RAM the game would run so smoothly and you could watch 3,000 barrels explosion like seen in another vid on here, just asking.
No, the barrel explosions have nothing to do with having 4GB of RAM. Your video card and CPU do all the processing work for that...that's what makes it so slow.
The processors (cpu, video card, etc.) make things run faster mainly, but lack of memory slows things down a lot...so if you run out of memory and the game starts using your hard drive, then you'll see Huge slow-downs. As long as you're not running out of memory though, having 200GB extra won't make a difference if the game doesn't need it.
"crysis physics destruction break jungle shoot kill explosion blow up blood killing fun cool graphics cg hd high definition helicopter chopper branches trees breaking fire burn PC video game gameplay art"???
WTF!??!?!??
morganiothegamer 4 months ago
thanks turkey for this game
Anticheater666 10 months ago
@4232267 Yeah it should. I recorded this on an old 8800GT (but not at a huge resolution) so you should have no problem running it.
iSOBigD 10 months ago
I run with motion blur off, mostly because it hurts performance but also cause I don't like the way it looks!
Railware 1 year ago
show when you shot a fat tree of with the ak 47
Mexiles110 1 year ago
it would be awesome if the minds behind destruction and physics behind red faction made a dbz game like the tenkaichi one....
it would be fucking awesome!!!
kakaroto1707 2 years ago
how come when i played this nothing was destructible
justinlikesprototype 2 years ago
You may have had physics disabled from the settings.
iSOBigD 2 years ago
@iSOBigD were can i acces the settings?
Deathbringer3557 1 year ago
@Deathbringer3557 In the options menu...
iSOBigD 1 year ago
u gotta turn on hugher graphic
Hugebull 2 years ago
put physiscs on low put it on mid
lukethedukea380 1 year ago
as Agentmass says RFG does have more realistic physics when it comes to building destruction. The devs hired actual building designers to help them make buildings with proper support amongst other stuff. If you've actually played it and have messed up a building you can stand near it and hear creaks and groans from the stressed structural support, sometimes a little dust may fall from where it's failing, and sometimes they spontaneously collapse. The devs have funny stories about makin it
Gr1mmReap3rT2 2 years ago
i know. if they put the gomod engine in with this game it would pwn
gamerman001 2 years ago
lol once i was taking cover inside this house, the enemy threw a grenade in there and the whole house shattered on top of me.
masterhidsert1043 2 years ago
That happens to me alot ;)
TechGn0me 2 years ago
your saying this isnt like lego?
OwfanTheNoob 2 years ago
if they added eviroments like this to gta i'd like be in heaven
joevil2025 2 years ago
Imagine : Red Faction Guerilla + Grand Theft Auto IV . There are no words to describe the awesomeness!
speedaddict2008 2 years ago
Oh yeah!
doom663 2 years ago
Imagine, there will also be no words for the lag... but it would be super awesome!!
watchme93 2 years ago
fuck that awsomeness? more like epicness
blackday12341 2 years ago
Taking down sky scrapers would be awesome..
I am guessing we are not far away from such games.
RandomDirectors 2 years ago
@RandomDirectors Crysis 2 will feature this?
paulnils 1 year ago
@paulnils Not from what I've seen. I've only seen destruction on par with Crysis 1 and Bad Company 2 really.
iSOBigD 1 year ago
Red Faction's destruction with crysis graphics would require a monster of a pc but it would be extremely lovely even to watch
RandomDirectors 1 year ago
@iSOBigD Have you ever played Red Faction Guerilla? Cuz I would say that kicks the crap out of Crysis physics (as long as graphics don't count as physics, cuz we know who wins there).
TheFXGuy 1 year ago
@iSOBigD If Crytek, and Geo-Mod 2.0 (for destruction) was combined, it would have the best destruction ever. Maybe, just maybe... Euphoria (GTA 4, RDR, Star Wars), Crytek, and Geo-mod 2.0 combined, making the best physics engine ever made.
cromwellsimon 1 year ago
@cromwellsimon Yeah I'd love to see that.
iSOBigD 1 year ago
@cromwellsimon what about nvidia
AustinChurch95 1 year ago
awesome
mjw911 2 years ago
thats nothing compared to the red factions gurila game physics it uses stress to simulate destruction
Agentmass 2 years ago 2
u must be fucking sick if u think that RFG have better physics than crysis lol...
Red Faction guerilla looks like lego and there is nothing realistic - buildings are falling like lego constructor, graphics is shit, i guess gameplay also is shit(from gameplay vidoes it looks like it's shit)
puoduh 2 years ago
red faction uses stress not just random destruction so befor you talk trash go and actualy find out what your talking about
Agentmass 2 years ago 2
Red Faction 3's physics do seem nice, but keep in mind it's coming out many years after Crysis. Also, it's coming out on consoles first so graphically it won't even be close to Crysis, which came out in 2007.
Graphically, I expect it to be a few years behind Crysis and more on par with that other game where you can dig tunnels and deform the ground with grenades. (Something Magic Carpet did back in 1994!)
iSOBigD 2 years ago
well you cant deform the landscape but in red faction 3 you can take a truck run off of a bridge and crash into a building and youl be inside the building puoduh dont you think thats cool?
Agentmass 2 years ago 2
Can't wait for the release!!! Tommorow!!! =D or Friday maby... hmm
Danskeren47 2 years ago
havok
Wojtekx18 2 years ago
you know that shack you blew up @ 0:31 try this some time there are claymore mines mounted on that little mound right across from that shack one of those mines if you shoot it will completey destroy everything around it way outside of the normal radius i think its a bug but its funny it will make your pc lag like hell though
meatwad8800 3 years ago
this is real time?
sammyman60 3 years ago
oh, alright, thanks.
heythereman123 3 years ago
how do you get crysis physics do you have to buy it or does it come with the game?
heythereman123 3 years ago
Crysis has physics as seen in this video by default. You get the game, play it or use the editor and just about everything has physics.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
ok, i got a question, I have win xp, a 8800GTX, and a quad core 2.4GHz intel (I know, intel sux, cant be helped). I ran crysis at maxed settings (High, since its XP) and when you shoot the trees they only break into chunks about a foot long, but my friend said he could shoot them into tiny bits with his vista/DX10 rig, and even after getting the dx10 .dlls and doing the very high hack thing i cant get his performance. Any help?
YinLord7845 3 years ago
how do you enable physics in crysis?
morales2008PL 3 years ago
Physics are always enabled. From the options menu, you can set them to high or whatever, based on how fast your system is, but the game always has physics.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
does ATI Radeon HD 3200 graphic card support this game?
pecoloko 3 years ago
Yes, but it'll run it very badly, possibly on low settings only.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
getting a 9600 gt 512mb gddr3(with 4 gbs and a 2.60Ghz AMD athlon dual core) what it could do. Most on high????
bunuptoast 3 years ago
Medium at best. That video card is not very fast at all. Just get a cheap 8800GT if you're on a tight budget (it's about $130), or a $200 HD3750.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
omg that sucks. Thats ok tho. But hey can I do SLI on one monitor so its like double graphics on one monitor????
bunuptoast 3 years ago
Yup, that's how SLI works. You need two of the same NVIDIA cards for that. Although you're better off buying one newer card than two 9600GT cards. Cards that cost double as probably more than twice as fast.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
so your saying 9600 GT and later on SLI with 9900 gt???
bunuptoast 3 years ago
No, for SLI you'd need two of the same card. That means two 9600GT cards, or two 8800GT, two 9800GT, etc.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
r u telling me that 8800 is better than a 9600??? omg now im just confused I thought the series measured like volume the higher the better
bunuptoast 3 years ago
Cards with "600" at the end are mid-range. Cards with "200" or "400" are low end and cards with "800" are high end. The 9600GT is newer than the 8800GT but is also slower.
It goes: 9600GT < 8800GT < 8800 GTX < 8800 Ultra < 9800GT < 9800GTX+ < GTX260 < 9800GX2 < GTX280. Hope that helps. :)
iSOBigD 3 years ago
that help a lot actually thanks a lot.
bunuptoast 3 years ago
Well you have a 8800 tell me. How long does the card last until it overheats and shuts down your PC. I have heard a lot about these overheating problems
bunuptoast 3 years ago
That's never happened to me, and I have the original model with the small fan. The temperature does get pretty high, to over 80 degrees, but for others it goes over 90. I have two huge case fans (36cm and 25cm) and a decent CPU fan that blows air out the back of the case (Zalman 9500). If you don't have good cooling, yours might overheat.
BUT, all newer 8800GT cards have bigger, quieter fans so overheating is not a problem for any newer versions. Look at pics before buying the card to check.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
so your recommending an 8800GT for somebody that has a fan on their PSU, CPU a 120mm and 80mm fan on the case, or is that fit for a 9800????
bunuptoast 3 years ago
If I had to pick between the 8800GT or 9800GT, I'd go with the 8800GT cause it costs a lot less and it's only a tiny bit slower. If you have about $200 to spend though, get the Radeon HD4750. It's the best card for the money right now.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
radeon???.. meh Im not gona trust an ATI probably never its hard enough understanding geforce graphics cards also guy look at this watch?v=C3yNfTIQa0o I think im fine. but thanks anyways
bunuptoast 3 years ago
Well, you're making a bad choice then. I'm recommending what's best right now for the money. The best fast cards for the money today are the AMD HD3750 ($200) and 3780 ($300). The 3870X2 is the fastest card currently out although it costs more, of course. Getting anything from NVIDIA for over $200 would be a bad choice.
Also, the 9600GT does NOT run Crysis on high well, let alone very high. Trust video card reviews, not 320x240 Youtube videos. Read some 9600GT reviews before buying it.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
Thank you so much I have been searching on forums to find a card comparison.
Oh and will Crysis run on my specs
Graphics Card: Nvidia 9800m GTX
Processor: Intel 2.8 Ghz Core 2 Duo
4 gigs of ram
im2craz 3 years ago
Yup.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
Cool vid ;)
ryans2k8 3 years ago
The enviorment is cool but its hard to shooot with it falling. By the way love the video
dannybodd 3 years ago
Can you play this with a macbook pro?
Amcacs5654 3 years ago
I don't think you can really play any games with a Maxbook Pro...World of Warcraft and some Mac ports might run, but other than that, the Macs are crap for games, even the really expensive ones.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
HL2 and CRYSIS are both very enjoyable.
the movie parts on crysis were awesome.
in2dax 3 years ago
sorta reminds me of half-life 2 lol
phoenixnyt 3 years ago
Yeah, except much better looking and with cooler weapons and enemies. :)
iSOBigD 3 years ago
I beg to differ. Half-Life 2 has more interesting enemies (and the coolest weapon in the world: the Gravity Gun).
ViktorBerg 3 years ago
The gravity gun was in other games and mods before HL2 came out. Also, what other cool guns does it have? Can you modify any of its weapons to fit your playing style? I love HL and HL2, but they're completely linear games where as Crysis isn't. Now I like the striders and those little striders, but the human (Combine) clone enemies are nowhere near as nice as the much smarter Crysis human enemies. They're much more fun to play against in Crysis.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
Well, I guess it boils down to the matter of preference. I played through both games (game series in case of HL), and I just happen to like HL more. Also, there is a certain degree of linearity in Crysis. You can't go back (especially in later parts of the game), and the side-to-side freedom of movement is present, but not well enough to call the game non-linear. Now, if we were talking STALKER... That's an example of non-linearity.
BTW, Combine humans in HL2 are not cloned, they are converted.
ViktorBerg 3 years ago
What I meant is they're exactly the same character model. They pulled the ol' "they have helmets on but really they're all different" trick...but there's very little variation in the human combine units. In Crysis at least they have different heads and lots more body variation too. Plus, they look insanely good, even up close.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
Yes, yes, you're right. But don't forget that HL2 is 3 years older than Crysis, which is a lot. Also, take a look at HL2:Ep2 characters - don't they look nice? Oh, and BTW, Crytek can't beat Valve at facial animation, which is kinda sad.
ViktorBerg 3 years ago
Well, Valve does have some good animators (I especially enjoy the TF2 animations). Crysis faces look much more realistic though thanks to much better modeling, texturing and the use of sub-surface scattering. And also, Valve tends to focus a lot on faces and completely neglect character bodies so they look pretty terrible in all HL2 episodes. In Crysis, everything from the smallest rock to the biggest enemy looks great. HL2 has mostly nice character faces and everything else is flat and blurry.
iSOBigD 3 years ago
I have the same specs are you dude and I get around the same results running Crysis, nice video.
JH1890 4 years ago
nice video man
great that you can play the game with an impresive image queality with only a 8800GT :)
Grayfoxj 4 years ago
love the vid, game looks awesome. I thought all the talk of crysis was all hype... till now, have got the same video card, am waiting for the q9450 to come out... if i can wait, when i saw your F.A vid of the megalith a while back it sold me on the q6600, never know, looks real slick in this.
dalechalfont 4 years ago
Oh man that game looks sooooo badass.
jubinizzle 4 years ago
Awesome. I'm getting a similar rig setup. Same processor and vid card but just 2gb of DDR2 RAM @ 800.
Revolver7251 4 years ago
That'll be great for any game. I bought 4GB just because I do 3D stuff too but even the best games barely use over 1GB of RAM.
iSOBigD 4 years ago
??
wtf are you talking about ,man
one of my 1gb ram is broken and now use 1gb amd all games are laging like i have a bad gpu pnly becouse og 1gb ram
1gb ram is oldtimes
system specs
maximus formual with quadcore q6600)G0(
ssapphire 3870(512 256Bit)
corsait 800c4 2 use 1gb
Windows vista 64bit
1gb wil maybe work with windows xp !
OnlyCrytek 4 years ago
??
wtf are you talking about ,man
one of my 1gb ram is broken and now use 1gb amd all games are laging like i have a bad gpu pnly becouse og 1gb ram
1gb ram is oldtimes
system specs
maximus formual with quadcore q6600)G0(
ssapphire 3870(512 256Bit)
corsait 800c4 2 use 1gb
Windows vista 64bit
1gb wil maybe work with windows xp !
OnlyCrytek 4 years ago
??
wtf are you talking about ,man
one of my 1gb ram is broken and now use 1gb amd all games are laging like i have a bad gpu pnly becouse og 1gb ram
1gb ram is oldtimes
system specs
maximus formual with quadcore q6600)G0(
ssapphire 3870(512 256Bit)
corsait 800c4 2 use 1gb
Windows vista 64bit
1gb wil maybe work with windows xp !
OnlyCrytek 4 years ago
One reply would have been enough. :) Most games that need more than 1GB actually use about 1.1GB, including Crysis. It rarely goes near 2GB, let alone 4. Also, Vista uses a lot more memory by default compared to XP, so just because Vista easts half your memory doesn't mean the game uses it. Anyway, the more the better, but 4GB or more is useless for games today.
iSOBigD 4 years ago
what do you mean 4 GB or more is useless for games today id think that if you had 4 gigs of RAM the game would run so smoothly and you could watch 3,000 barrels explosion like seen in another vid on here, just asking.
coondogtheman1234 4 years ago
No, the barrel explosions have nothing to do with having 4GB of RAM. Your video card and CPU do all the processing work for that...that's what makes it so slow.
iSOBigD 4 years ago
but wouldnt more memory make it run faster
coondogtheman1234 4 years ago
but wouldnt more memory make it run faster
coondogtheman1234 4 years ago
no, he already has 3gb
DevilSpawn1 4 years ago
oh, and sorry for the double post, my shitty aol browser was being stupid lol
coondogtheman1234 4 years ago
The processors (cpu, video card, etc.) make things run faster mainly, but lack of memory slows things down a lot...so if you run out of memory and the game starts using your hard drive, then you'll see Huge slow-downs. As long as you're not running out of memory though, having 200GB extra won't make a difference if the game doesn't need it.
iSOBigD 4 years ago
I know sorry about that double post blame my gay ass aol browser, and no i cant get the links to the videos i cant copy link b/c of gayOL
coondogtheman1234 4 years ago
this game is fucking awsome
rcman123 4 years ago
thanx im ordering my rig tomorrow with a q6000
it looks like theres no need for oc yet
royraiden 4 years ago
is you quad overclocked?
royraiden 4 years ago
No, I didn't see the need yet so it's at 2.4ghz still. I have a decent Zalman cooler on it though so I'll oc it someday just for fun.
iSOBigD 4 years ago