Sorry, but no one except Russian(truly Russian) can understand this melody. I do not disriminate, I respect western pianist, but this is true. We Russians have very special soul, may be crazy at one point, but special.
@musicpiano14 thats like saying only polish can understand chopin's work, and only chinese can understand tan dun's work, and only westerners can understand john cage's work. no one is special. the interpreter is merely a mirror, reflecting the composer's intentions, not adding nor taking away anything from the piece.
@FreackZz I agree with you, but not 100%. Country where you born, your native language - it is all plays great deal to understanding culture. Of course westerns can play Rachmaninoff(as an example) great, BUT they will never play it and understand it like Horowitz does(who had roots in Russia) and Rachmaninoff himself .
You saw probably lang lang 3d concerto,,
Anyway I listen russian music more than european( i love it too).
I think everyone playing this piece should go and find the lyrics of the original song (it's a Russian romance by Glinka, called "Zhavoronok") and understand what it's about. The translation is available online. It's not happy or matter-of-fact in meaning.
Rather lifeless & wooden opening. I can't imagine any singer phrasing in such a static manner. It wakes up,(as a good Lark should!), in the filigree decoration, but ending let down by bumpy trills & thin sound(too much left pedal). Still waiting for the ideal BaLARKirev!
Actually I think you're being a bit charitable! Although R de W can play the notes well enough, the whole thing sounds singularly unromantic and matter-of-fact, the filigree more like technical exercise than decorative arabesque - and you're right about those bumpy trills!
R.I.P rian :)
i wont forget you.
hjiuhfhrehui 7 months ago
took my breath away.
FaustianDreams 1 year ago
I'm surprised that there are more than 5 people don't like this :(
felix0911176727 1 year ago 2
Sorry, but no one except Russian(truly Russian) can understand this melody. I do not disriminate, I respect western pianist, but this is true. We Russians have very special soul, may be crazy at one point, but special.
musicpiano14 2 years ago
@musicpiano14 thats like saying only polish can understand chopin's work, and only chinese can understand tan dun's work, and only westerners can understand john cage's work. no one is special. the interpreter is merely a mirror, reflecting the composer's intentions, not adding nor taking away anything from the piece.
FreackZz 1 year ago 2
@FreackZz I agree with you, but not 100%. Country where you born, your native language - it is all plays great deal to understanding culture. Of course westerns can play Rachmaninoff(as an example) great, BUT they will never play it and understand it like Horowitz does(who had roots in Russia) and Rachmaninoff himself .
You saw probably lang lang 3d concerto,,
Anyway I listen russian music more than european( i love it too).
But i feel more Russian music.
musicpiano14 1 year ago
@musicpiano14 Utter balls.
Lebowski53 1 year ago
I agree with NOSEhow1LIV. It is very wooden , but it could be because of the piano.
SophiaSu52 2 years ago
My puppy's name is Lark!
MeadowLarkBC 2 years ago
Круто!
Aleksandro203 2 years ago
I liked it.
fhood 2 years ago
555555********
444mariam 2 years ago
it makes me cry! literally.
CAPGEMS 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it makes me throw hot water over my children they also cry
SolidSnake1884 2 years ago
soulessssss
dollypondrocks 3 years ago
I think everyone playing this piece should go and find the lyrics of the original song (it's a Russian romance by Glinka, called "Zhavoronok") and understand what it's about. The translation is available online. It's not happy or matter-of-fact in meaning.
musicyh 3 years ago
can u provide the source?I mean the translation of the lyrics.
chopinliszt2001 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out this website, there is a translation here:
novichok3 2 years ago
Rather lifeless & wooden opening. I can't imagine any singer phrasing in such a static manner. It wakes up,(as a good Lark should!), in the filigree decoration, but ending let down by bumpy trills & thin sound(too much left pedal). Still waiting for the ideal BaLARKirev!
NOSEhow2LIV 3 years ago
Actually I think you're being a bit charitable! Although R de W can play the notes well enough, the whole thing sounds singularly unromantic and matter-of-fact, the filigree more like technical exercise than decorative arabesque - and you're right about those bumpy trills!
paulprocopolis 3 years ago