Heavily poked out notes, very little sense of line or singing, unable to decide between bathos or hysteria.......Not the best of this pianist. She always played better when she wore totally flat shoes!
Comment massacrer un tel joyau de musicalité par une interprétation affectée,"gourmée" pleine de décalages désagréables. Il n'y a plus d'émotion ni d'intériorité. Voir Wild .
Comment massacrer un tel joyau de musicalité par une interprétation affectée,"gourmée" pleine de décalages désagréables. Il n'y a plus d'émotion ni d'intériorité. Voir Wild .
Quel dommage qu'une si grande artiste ne respecte pas l'intériorité de cette oeuvre profonde et pathétique ! On n'a pas trop envie de communier avec cette musique. Ah Rachmaninoff !!!
I think the microphones are waaay too close. I was listening live to this at RFH, but sitting at the back. It turned my gut inside out. It sounded very tender and sensual especially in contrast with previous works played.
Rather different impression when I listen to this recording
I agree, but could be the microphones are too close. L.H. is way heavy. I also don't like how the bass notes interupt the musical line rhythmically. Sound is definitley percussive. - not am iota of tenderness.
@maestrojimbo: yes, the sound is probably corrupted by microphones, but it is really percussive. There is also a overwhelming use of rubato at each measure of the score.... too much to be really expressive...
Yes, it really doesn't have any hint that this is a "dance" form, does it. Kissin has a rather odd way of playing this - way too slow and not appealing to my tastes either.
@debbyplayer I agree :-) Have not heard anyone do justice to this piece except for Rach. His interpretation is surreal - an understatement on my part - no other way to describe Rachmaninoff :-))
@pianistPT Thanks :-) I heard Novaes' play it a few days ago and I liked it a lot and I have begun to listen to more from her. Nelson Freire's interpretation of this is also beautiful - and then there is Rachmaninoff's that is absolutely surreal :-)
Heavily poked out notes, very little sense of line or singing, unable to decide between bathos or hysteria.......Not the best of this pianist. She always played better when she wore totally flat shoes!
NOSEhow2LIV 1 month ago
@NOSEhow2LIV I go even further. The way she modified stuff in this piece is ridiculous.
pianistPT 3 weeks ago
Horrible. Listen to the Novaes to hear how it should be done...
operascenestudy 1 month ago
@operascenestudy YES!!!!! YES^!!!!!!!!! TOtally agreed.Guiomar Novaes makes your heart cry. it is really superbe. This here is shit.
pianistPT 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Comment massacrer un tel joyau de musicalité par une interprétation affectée,"gourmée" pleine de décalages désagréables. Il n'y a plus d'émotion ni d'intériorité. Voir Wild .
C. Bourgeaux
ordipapa 1 month ago
Comment massacrer un tel joyau de musicalité par une interprétation affectée,"gourmée" pleine de décalages désagréables. Il n'y a plus d'émotion ni d'intériorité. Voir Wild .
C. Bourgeaux
ordipapa 1 month ago
À côté de la plaque .... Accompagnement ... Interprétation affectée insupportable ...
Achille92190 2 months ago
definitely in the underworld...........
chrisczajasager 3 months ago
Quel dommage qu'une si grande artiste ne respecte pas l'intériorité de cette oeuvre profonde et pathétique ! On n'a pas trop envie de communier avec cette musique. Ah Rachmaninoff !!!
cannelle06600 3 months ago
She is playing this piece not for Gluck but for NYCB with George Balanchine in Chaconne.
MukudaiYoshiyuki 6 months ago
Hard to gauge her unique interpretation. Bad recording.
mycatsapunk 9 months ago
@debbyplayer
I think the microphones are waaay too close. I was listening live to this at RFH, but sitting at the back. It turned my gut inside out. It sounded very tender and sensual especially in contrast with previous works played.
Rather different impression when I listen to this recording
AgentO2007 1 year ago
In my opinion her phrasing is really bad, her touch is heavy, her expression is insensitive.
debbyplayer 1 year ago
@debbyplayer
I agree, but could be the microphones are too close. L.H. is way heavy. I also don't like how the bass notes interupt the musical line rhythmically. Sound is definitley percussive. - not am iota of tenderness.
maestrojimbo 1 year ago
@maestrojimbo: yes, the sound is probably corrupted by microphones, but it is really percussive. There is also a overwhelming use of rubato at each measure of the score.... too much to be really expressive...
debbyplayer 1 year ago
@debbyplayer
Yes, it really doesn't have any hint that this is a "dance" form, does it. Kissin has a rather odd way of playing this - way too slow and not appealing to my tastes either.
maestrojimbo 1 year ago
@maestrojimbo
Have you heard Mark Hambourg play this? - wonderful!
maestrojimbo 1 year ago
In my opinion, you should drown yourself.
Imbecile!
marburg9 10 months ago
@marburg9
Dear friend, thank you for your kind and enlightened comment :-)
debbyplayer 10 months ago
@debbyplayer I agree :-) Have not heard anyone do justice to this piece except for Rach. His interpretation is surreal - an understatement on my part - no other way to describe Rachmaninoff :-))
Bret6464 4 months ago
@Bret6464 if you have not hear anyone do justice to this piece, listen to Guiomar Novaes.
pianistPT 3 weeks ago
@pianistPT Thanks :-) I heard Novaes' play it a few days ago and I liked it a lot and I have begun to listen to more from her. Nelson Freire's interpretation of this is also beautiful - and then there is Rachmaninoff's that is absolutely surreal :-)
Bret6464 3 weeks ago
LONDON SISTER , i love this great movie !!
GM12111974 1 year ago 2