Galfond.. i don't know what you are doing.. You follow here like 150k with one single pair in hand and in another video you refused to pay the same money when you had straight. Anyway, i like you cutey <3
@BoobiesHooray Daniel is cool and your comment is bitchy. Mike behave horibbly saying "How that's we play poker boys" after flopping K99, having KK...
What is daniel thinking at the last hand. Doyle check-raised hum all in (7x) and he calls with top pair nog even top kicker? The best daniel could hope for is that doyle has got two overs + a flush draw or similar draws that would be like 50-50. Snap calling with net even getting 2:1... i am not a poker expert that believes he is better than the pro's but daniel just is a major pay-off wizard.
Daniel made a lot of mistakes but the 97 cooler is just unavoidable. The 10s is a different situation though. Daniel should know that Mike isn't limp raising with 9s so even if he flops an overpair, he's still probably dead. Mike was actually right when he said he had the best hand Daniel could have hoped for because Mike is playing like a big NIT and he's not gonna donk off his money after folding AJs etc...
That call against Doyle was questionable. Doyle has two pair most of the time.
durrrs comment about the pocket tens hand is kinda strange...he 3-bet pre flop he could have had an over pair even though he has a wide 3- betting range but he has to get a hand at some time...mabye thats why hes there and im here but i dont think its that easy of a call he would have played an over pair the same way...anyone agree???
@conorharten nah i think durrrr commented about it because he bet relatively small in comparison to the pot, as though he had a 9 and was value-betting his full house against a pair of 7s of 8s. so he found it crazy that elky would fold 10s when there were only three hands that could beat him. if durrrr bet more im sure he wont have made that comment :p but who knows, im not durrrr but i hope this kinda helped :p
Instant karma is when you berate a player for playing to tight, and then lose your entire stack to him twice within one hour. This year the High Stakes Poker Instant Karma award goes to ... ?
I always try to save money on all the things I buy. I do it in various ways including online. This video shows a system that was totally new to me. You can even get a smart phone at a discount.
Moron Mike thinks it is an advantage to have the largest stack? Just the opposite is true. Think about it. You can get your money in and watch the others knock each other out without it costing you a chip. That is the reason for a min buy-in and why it is against the rules to go south with chips.
@JiveDadson If you're shortstacked, than your play is much more limited. If your only move is to get it all in, you're only going to win the blinds most of the time. And I think Doyle knows best. He made it abundantly clear in Super System that it's better not only to be a large stack, but the largest stack on the table.
@djdiddles99 That cuts both ways. The opponent's play is likewise more limited against you. The differentiating factor is when you are all-in versus two or more others who are still battling and knocking each other out at no risk to you. I have read Super System. I disagree with it on this point. So does Barry Greenstein. Obviously, I do not play at the level of those two, but Barry's argument is logical.
Mike is an idiot, but everyone folded to him and he was scared to play Elky who made an early position raise, haha, it's a bad play, but i guess he was up 400k and wanted to make sure he kept it, he left 4 mins later, so can't really blame him too much, but it was still bad for tv, and he should be charged like Gabe said!!
1m bet to be a vegetatrian for a year,and then dwan lets him to buy out just for 150k....why not Dwan torutred him more....like asking for 2,5m from ivey and then he can have his stake or be vegetarian for 11 month more! shame noone offers me a million to become a vegetarian for a year...im poor,cant afford much meat anyways!
I didn't know there were still people who don't realise poker does have a relatively high luck factor. Every player that is not awful at poker could tell you that.
@nickhoksbergen Care to elaborate? And please avoid posting some crap about some bad beat. In the long run, when the money goes in, the expected value always outweigh the variance.
@nickhoksbergen so you say poker has a "relative high luck factor" because AA 'only' holds up slighty less than 90% of the time vs 7-2 all in pre flop? How can you claim poker to have a HIGH luck factor by stating an example where the best hand holds up 9 out of 10 times?
@nickhoksbergen just because you never bothered to learn how to calculate pot odds and probability it doesnt mean its not true. But whatever, keep thinking luck plays a huge part and enjoy donating your money.
@comeonyoudidnt Come back when you learn the meaning of "relatively". I just can't be arsed to help you understand facts, one day if you learn how poker works in practice instead of in theory you may stop denying a very simple fact.
@nickhoksbergen Because poker works so very different in practice compared to in theory? The math is the same, bud. Whether it be on the felt or on the paper. All I did was ask you to back up your claims with some facts other than posting some bad beat. You replied by posting a bad beat. I accept the fact that you view poker differently than I do, but please back up your statement with something other than dribble.
@comeonyoudidnt What you don't seem to get is that in Texas Hold 'em, no matter what you do, the cards are completely random. You only know the 2 cards in your hand and any cards on the table. Okay so sure, you might be able to make a very good read, and know all the hands of your opponents by paying attention to limps and pre-flop raises. That's great. So, let's say on a rainbow flop, you got like top two pair, and your opponent goes all in (with whatever, could be bottom trips or backdoor..
@nickhoksbergen Flush draw, or backdoor straight draw, doesn't even matter. You have to call if you are sure he doesn't have trips. That's the point where you call and you let the cards handle the pot. That is where the luck factor comes in. You could make full house, he could make a flush, trips, better two pair, or whatever he could get with his hand. This is the point where, skill isn't an issue but its just getting the right cards layed down. Now, sure, you could've done a good read that he.
@nickhoksbergen was drawing, but that is as far as it goes for your skill. You could've also used your amazing skills to calculate the exact odds of what the chances are of your opponent winning, but even if those odds or 1% 11% or 33% it is all irrelevant when the right cards get on the table. Sure it is a great amount of skill required, but by the fact that it has a random factor it is definitely not 100% skill and so there is luck involved in a game of Texas Hold'em poker.
@comeonyoudidnt Haven't read the original comment to which you are responding. But when 10% of the time the best hand against the worst doesn't hold up (a factor which only goes up when relative "goodness" of hands start closing) then yes, I'd say 10% is a quite high number. Especially when there is absolutely nothing a good or a bad player can do about it. But no, I'm not saying poker is a game of chance. It's a combination of skill and chance both.
@juuonse I wholeheartedly agree on it beeing a game of both skill and luck. What most people dont realise though is how big of an edge the better players actually have, but thats a whole other story;) If you look at ONE single hand I agree that being a big favourite doesnt always work out, but imagine if you play thousands of hands each day and most of the time you go all in you are a 60-100% favourite; who do you think wins teh money the long run? :)
@comeonyoudidnt It's a matter of interpretation really. In the long run good players are able to decrease their variance on their earnings. However, as each hand is an isolated event thereby the variance per hand is not,in essence, decreased. This is one of the reasons so many legislations find it hard to classify "poker" as a game of skill which in turn affect attitude towards the game in legal terms. Luckily countries like Denmark have updated their legislation on these issues with new terms.
@comeonyoudidnt but yes, in the long run, it is more probable that the skilled player makes more money. However, it is possible to hit a losing streak on "big hands" ending up with negative net earnings even if the total sum of hands won is positive. But yes, it is more likely a skilled player is able to stabilize his income curve whereas an unskilled might vary heavily between wins and losses.
@Anonomousxxx It's not luck at all, if you knew anything about poker you'd know that and you'd know that Daniel has been making horrible decisions every time on HSP. Dwan and Ivey know when to get away from hands and what to do, but Daniel just convinces himself to keep calling and keep shoving, etc. It's bad poker he's been playing.
@FiduciaInDio Worst Daniels mistakes in all of HSP were when he knows he's beaten but he pays anyway just so he can show everybody how unlucky he is and whine about it.He's very bad cash player,like Phill Hellmuth,they can go on tournaments collect fish chips,real game is not 4 them.Also,on tournaments it should be last 1 on table goes forward,but every new table should start from beggining,with equal amount of chips.And not,on final table,1 has 10 millions and other has 100k
@bukowski1950 DN's cash game has been reinvigorated by playing alot of online poker. i would go as far as to say he's pretty decent now, though he's still a calling station
@bukowski1950 i think Daniel's problem is that he tries too hard to play like Dwan..raising preflop a lot with mediorcre hands. However, when he doesn't hit his hand, he gets stuck in bluff mode. When he hits a pair, but gets bet into, he has trouble folding. I think he'll be a much better cash game player if he bet less, call less, and play less hands.
@djdiddles99 He's by far the worst player I've seen playing poker with these guys. I don't know how he's still playing, he borrows money every time just to play...
Tom Dwan will always pay even if he has one pair of 2 cause he is a lucky donk that is always saved by fucking luck!!!
PeachCeca 3 days ago
Galfond.. i don't know what you are doing.. You follow here like 150k with one single pair in hand and in another video you refused to pay the same money when you had straight. Anyway, i like you cutey <3
PeachCeca 3 days ago
lol imohtep
garciaj36 1 week ago
first time i´ve seen a player tip the dealer! nice from daniel even though he´s behind.
Samet3009 1 week ago
at 8min30 its cool to see dwan back up negreanu on matusow's poker attitude. that seemed to cheer daniel up a little
ATfilms21 2 weeks ago
K Q suited 3000 to call ... Mike folds.. that's how we play poker boys...
He's such an idiot but i like him for some reason..
rusjones 2 weeks ago
Love doyles hellmuth impression
Adaminski95 2 weeks ago
galfond the donk
KingKuba1313 3 weeks ago
@KingKuba1313
"With a lifetime net profit of over $8M in Internet poker play, he has been one of the most successful online poker players in history"
(wikipedia quote)
EdddSaid 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KingKuba1313
"With a lifetime net profit of over $8M in Internet poker play, he has been one of the most successful online poker players in history"
(wikipedia quote)
EdddSaid 2 weeks ago
@KingKuba1313 You know nothing
stefts1 6 days ago
I dislike Eli Elezra. Eli has an disgusting personality! Can he please shut the fck up?
SoGreatToHaveFun 3 weeks ago
Eli Elezra is a fucking cunt meat head! His a fucking luckbox and a stupid asshole!
SoGreatToHaveFun 3 weeks ago
Matusow: " I`ve been hit by a buss"
Elezra:" We can see that..."
Yes Matusow we see that it made you "different'
JUST STFU ALREADY AND PLAY
oneselfishguy 1 month ago
what did dwan said at 27:45 and what does it mean?
poinked 1 month ago
@poinked He's trying to get them to play the 2 7 game. So if anyone wins a hand with 2 7 he will get a bounty for each player at the table.
Totuus2011 1 month ago
"It'd be great if another 10 comes up then we'd see some action." LOL!
At 31:30.
duckswtf 1 month ago 11
@duckswtf do you heard of ironie?
clan1993 1 week ago
Like a good neighbor, Tom Dwan was there. LOLOL
RiceForAzn 1 month ago
I used to think Daniel was cool, but he is just a bitch. He deserved exactly what he got in those two hands last episode against Mike.
BoobiesHooray 1 month ago
@BoobiesHooray agreee 100%
romadadrummer 1 month ago
@BoobiesHooray Daniel is cool and your comment is bitchy. Mike behave horibbly saying "How that's we play poker boys" after flopping K99, having KK...
guanamono 1 month ago 3
@guanamono
derp
DizzyWalin91 1 month ago
Comment removed
BoobiesHooray 1 month ago
35:55 mike cant call 3k with QK of diamonds
78k7 1 month ago 12
anyone else notice how elky says i have 210 when dwan asks him how much, such a subtle tell haha (two tens)
saosinrising 1 month ago
nit alert nit alert nit alert
professor4444 1 month ago
haha kaplan is great
FooneyMoonky13 1 month ago
matusow nice hit&run
volter84 2 months ago
im going to look at this fooooooone
ruarihennessy1 2 months ago
Gabe Kaplan the commentator is hilarious.
dingostar2620 2 months ago
Brunson is the GREATEST of all time. the Muhammad Ali of poker, the Jordan of poker. build that pyramid!!
shaoiliu 2 months ago
good call by elky... i would of definitely put tom on JJ or QQ
folding would be bad because the value bet was pretty small
Noobplug 2 months ago
DN is such a bad player...slams his chips and raise? lol
popselias 2 months ago
such a bad call by galfond
tsias10 3 months ago
@tsias10 shutup u fucking moron
ruarihennessy1 2 months ago
Damn mike matusow will be arrested by chuck noris LOL 39:50
Adelvilla 4 months ago
@Adelvilla funny that
ruarihennessy1 2 months ago
What is daniel thinking at the last hand. Doyle check-raised hum all in (7x) and he calls with top pair nog even top kicker? The best daniel could hope for is that doyle has got two overs + a flush draw or similar draws that would be like 50-50. Snap calling with net even getting 2:1... i am not a poker expert that believes he is better than the pro's but daniel just is a major pay-off wizard.
tommyXBOX360 4 months ago
35:50 "see u have fears of big bets, i have fears of big buses" tom dwan's a genius hahahaha
jzcho1 4 months ago
Can someone explain to me the argument against sunglasses at the poker table? I can't understand what Tom Dwan is saying!
SuperMyfamily01 4 months ago
Daniel made a lot of mistakes but the 97 cooler is just unavoidable. The 10s is a different situation though. Daniel should know that Mike isn't limp raising with 9s so even if he flops an overpair, he's still probably dead. Mike was actually right when he said he had the best hand Daniel could have hoped for because Mike is playing like a big NIT and he's not gonna donk off his money after folding AJs etc...
That call against Doyle was questionable. Doyle has two pair most of the time.
dealerG 4 months ago
"When I'm crossing a street and a bus is coming, I usually get worried" Tom is sooo funny
cashguy1 4 months ago
Matusow is a fucking HIT n RUNNER... total fish.
MrJonnyboy36 4 months ago
in texas you can go to jail for that hahaha gabe is hilarious
kieferroche1995 4 months ago
@kieferroche1995 It's capitol offence..
MrJonnyboy36 4 months ago
durrrs comment about the pocket tens hand is kinda strange...he 3-bet pre flop he could have had an over pair even though he has a wide 3- betting range but he has to get a hand at some time...mabye thats why hes there and im here but i dont think its that easy of a call he would have played an over pair the same way...anyone agree???
conorharten 4 months ago
@conorharten nah i think durrrr commented about it because he bet relatively small in comparison to the pot, as though he had a 9 and was value-betting his full house against a pair of 7s of 8s. so he found it crazy that elky would fold 10s when there were only three hands that could beat him. if durrrr bet more im sure he wont have made that comment :p but who knows, im not durrrr but i hope this kinda helped :p
ATfilms21 3 months ago
Instant karma is when you berate a player for playing to tight, and then lose your entire stack to him twice within one hour. This year the High Stakes Poker Instant Karma award goes to ... ?
VicenzoV 4 months ago
@djdiddles99 being a nit and just getting his tv time, what else?
JBades6310 4 months ago
yes, do it imhotep :D!!!!!!
LeoGMaster 5 months ago
I always try to save money on all the things I buy. I do it in various ways including online. This video shows a system that was totally new to me. You can even get a smart phone at a discount.
MrBidwin 5 months ago
mike is an annoying faggot i bet they hate playing with him..
Steveoizzle1988 5 months ago
@Steveoizzle1988 He is such a donk they put up with it coz they know he will be leaving with less than what he bought
Ace303232 5 months ago
Moron Mike thinks it is an advantage to have the largest stack? Just the opposite is true. Think about it. You can get your money in and watch the others knock each other out without it costing you a chip. That is the reason for a min buy-in and why it is against the rules to go south with chips.
JiveDadson 6 months ago
@JiveDadson If you're shortstacked, than your play is much more limited. If your only move is to get it all in, you're only going to win the blinds most of the time. And I think Doyle knows best. He made it abundantly clear in Super System that it's better not only to be a large stack, but the largest stack on the table.
djdiddles99 6 months ago
@djdiddles99 That cuts both ways. The opponent's play is likewise more limited against you. The differentiating factor is when you are all-in versus two or more others who are still battling and knocking each other out at no risk to you. I have read Super System. I disagree with it on this point. So does Barry Greenstein. Obviously, I do not play at the level of those two, but Barry's argument is logical.
JiveDadson 5 months ago
Mike is an idiot, but everyone folded to him and he was scared to play Elky who made an early position raise, haha, it's a bad play, but i guess he was up 400k and wanted to make sure he kept it, he left 4 mins later, so can't really blame him too much, but it was still bad for tv, and he should be charged like Gabe said!!
leafs109 6 months ago
1m bet to be a vegetatrian for a year,and then dwan lets him to buy out just for 150k....why not Dwan torutred him more....like asking for 2,5m from ivey and then he can have his stake or be vegetarian for 11 month more! shame noone offers me a million to become a vegetarian for a year...im poor,cant afford much meat anyways!
BitiiteBrauns 6 months ago
And this is the guy who titled his autobiography "Check Raising the Devil"...what a fucking bitch.
TheBccemify 6 months ago
Here's our ice sculpture because when you think of poker you think of ice sculpture ... Gabe is the best hahaha
johnnyblux666 6 months ago
@johnnyblux666 hahahah, true, he is so random and funny!
leafs109 6 months ago
0:32
Falke21 6 months ago
Comment removed
Falke21 6 months ago
Gabe is the best!
pablosgscr 6 months ago
31:34 It will be great if another ten comes up, then we'll really see some action. Ehh, it's a nine. LOL
Raghy07 6 months ago
"g'nite Mike, see you at your arraignment" 40:15
Animedive 6 months ago
Lmao Gabe is so funnnnnny
WindBreaker77 6 months ago
Lol is Elky speaking French at 24:45? Can't understand his english, it's too fast...
WindBreaker77 6 months ago
Doyle cracks me up
YLUMRR1 6 months ago
30 seconds naked with kara
regel1971 6 months ago
I didn't know there were still people who don't realise poker does have a relatively high luck factor. Every player that is not awful at poker could tell you that.
nickhoksbergen 6 months ago
@nickhoksbergen Care to elaborate? And please avoid posting some crap about some bad beat. In the long run, when the money goes in, the expected value always outweigh the variance.
comeonyoudidnt 6 months ago 4
@comeonyoudidnt
Luck meaning that if you go all in with 2-7 against bullets pre-flop you can still win with 2-7. That is where the luck factor comes in.
nickhoksbergen 6 months ago
@nickhoksbergen so you say poker has a "relative high luck factor" because AA 'only' holds up slighty less than 90% of the time vs 7-2 all in pre flop? How can you claim poker to have a HIGH luck factor by stating an example where the best hand holds up 9 out of 10 times?
comeonyoudidnt 6 months ago 3
@comeonyoudidnt
You better be trolling
nickhoksbergen 6 months ago
@nickhoksbergen just because you never bothered to learn how to calculate pot odds and probability it doesnt mean its not true. But whatever, keep thinking luck plays a huge part and enjoy donating your money.
comeonyoudidnt 6 months ago
@comeonyoudidnt Come back when you learn the meaning of "relatively". I just can't be arsed to help you understand facts, one day if you learn how poker works in practice instead of in theory you may stop denying a very simple fact.
nickhoksbergen 6 months ago
@nickhoksbergen Because poker works so very different in practice compared to in theory? The math is the same, bud. Whether it be on the felt or on the paper. All I did was ask you to back up your claims with some facts other than posting some bad beat. You replied by posting a bad beat. I accept the fact that you view poker differently than I do, but please back up your statement with something other than dribble.
comeonyoudidnt 6 months ago
@comeonyoudidnt What you don't seem to get is that in Texas Hold 'em, no matter what you do, the cards are completely random. You only know the 2 cards in your hand and any cards on the table. Okay so sure, you might be able to make a very good read, and know all the hands of your opponents by paying attention to limps and pre-flop raises. That's great. So, let's say on a rainbow flop, you got like top two pair, and your opponent goes all in (with whatever, could be bottom trips or backdoor..
nickhoksbergen 6 months ago
@nickhoksbergen Flush draw, or backdoor straight draw, doesn't even matter. You have to call if you are sure he doesn't have trips. That's the point where you call and you let the cards handle the pot. That is where the luck factor comes in. You could make full house, he could make a flush, trips, better two pair, or whatever he could get with his hand. This is the point where, skill isn't an issue but its just getting the right cards layed down. Now, sure, you could've done a good read that he.
nickhoksbergen 6 months ago
@nickhoksbergen was drawing, but that is as far as it goes for your skill. You could've also used your amazing skills to calculate the exact odds of what the chances are of your opponent winning, but even if those odds or 1% 11% or 33% it is all irrelevant when the right cards get on the table. Sure it is a great amount of skill required, but by the fact that it has a random factor it is definitely not 100% skill and so there is luck involved in a game of Texas Hold'em poker.
nickhoksbergen 6 months ago
@comeonyoudidnt Haven't read the original comment to which you are responding. But when 10% of the time the best hand against the worst doesn't hold up (a factor which only goes up when relative "goodness" of hands start closing) then yes, I'd say 10% is a quite high number. Especially when there is absolutely nothing a good or a bad player can do about it. But no, I'm not saying poker is a game of chance. It's a combination of skill and chance both.
juuonse 1 month ago
@juuonse I wholeheartedly agree on it beeing a game of both skill and luck. What most people dont realise though is how big of an edge the better players actually have, but thats a whole other story;) If you look at ONE single hand I agree that being a big favourite doesnt always work out, but imagine if you play thousands of hands each day and most of the time you go all in you are a 60-100% favourite; who do you think wins teh money the long run? :)
comeonyoudidnt 1 month ago
@comeonyoudidnt It's a matter of interpretation really. In the long run good players are able to decrease their variance on their earnings. However, as each hand is an isolated event thereby the variance per hand is not,in essence, decreased. This is one of the reasons so many legislations find it hard to classify "poker" as a game of skill which in turn affect attitude towards the game in legal terms. Luckily countries like Denmark have updated their legislation on these issues with new terms.
juuonse 1 month ago
@comeonyoudidnt but yes, in the long run, it is more probable that the skilled player makes more money. However, it is possible to hit a losing streak on "big hands" ending up with negative net earnings even if the total sum of hands won is positive. But yes, it is more likely a skilled player is able to stabilize his income curve whereas an unskilled might vary heavily between wins and losses.
juuonse 1 month ago
@comeonyoudidnt yea yea in statistics 101 that is what they teach you.... unfortunately in reality
Celmak1 6 months ago
@comeonyoudidnt try playing on pokerstars
848harris 6 months ago
Matasow "i loose 60%'s 9 out of 10 times"
golfdeano 6 months ago
@golfdeano Yeah, online that's about right
leshene21 6 months ago
"there's our ice sculpture, we have it there because whenever you think of poker you think of ice sculptures. loool.. Gabe u funny bugga
raddo01 7 months ago
Mike is easily the worst nit ive seen, KQ suited in the SB and folds for 2.600 more, wowww
AdenEFC 7 months ago 2
damn poker is so much about luck
if ivey or dwan were running as bad as daniel they would have lose very much too
Anonomousxxx 7 months ago
@Anonomousxxx It's not luck at all, if you knew anything about poker you'd know that and you'd know that Daniel has been making horrible decisions every time on HSP. Dwan and Ivey know when to get away from hands and what to do, but Daniel just convinces himself to keep calling and keep shoving, etc. It's bad poker he's been playing.
FiduciaInDio 7 months ago
@FiduciaInDio cmon it was mosttly frustration
again, if dwan and ivey had that luck they would have lost a lot too
straight vs fullhouse, trips vs fullhouse, fullhouse vs quads, and thay almost always draw out on him and he never hits his draws
Im not saying he was playing very well, but he was playing ok, and the point is that poker is very much about luck
Anonomousxxx 7 months ago
@FiduciaInDio Worst Daniels mistakes in all of HSP were when he knows he's beaten but he pays anyway just so he can show everybody how unlucky he is and whine about it.He's very bad cash player,like Phill Hellmuth,they can go on tournaments collect fish chips,real game is not 4 them.Also,on tournaments it should be last 1 on table goes forward,but every new table should start from beggining,with equal amount of chips.And not,on final table,1 has 10 millions and other has 100k
bukowski1950 7 months ago
@bukowski1950 DN's cash game has been reinvigorated by playing alot of online poker. i would go as far as to say he's pretty decent now, though he's still a calling station
Dbkim92 7 months ago
@Dbkim92 agree,he was much better in last season,but then again,in last season there was not even close competition as in previous seasons.
bukowski1950 7 months ago
@bukowski1950 i think Daniel's problem is that he tries too hard to play like Dwan..raising preflop a lot with mediorcre hands. However, when he doesn't hit his hand, he gets stuck in bluff mode. When he hits a pair, but gets bet into, he has trouble folding. I think he'll be a much better cash game player if he bet less, call less, and play less hands.
samueljue 5 months ago
@samueljue Agree 100%.He just want to play like durrr..
bukowski1950 5 months ago
@samueljue youre fucking wrong.daniel doesnt try to play like dwan .....he was this bad before dwan learned poker
yellow6100 4 months ago
WTF doesnt even call with KQs in small blind?!?!??! srsly....
Tumppe1337 7 months ago 3
Comment removed
Tumppe1337 7 months ago
39:00 Sums up high stakes poker...Dwan has an 8 kicker to Negreanu's 7
BUNCECENTRAL 7 months ago
KQ suited and Mouth doesn't call 3,000?? What the hell is he doing there?
djdiddles99 7 months ago 46
@djdiddles99 thats why people on the table doesnt respect him..
AlwaysinTrancee 7 months ago
@djdiddles99 He's by far the worst player I've seen playing poker with these guys. I don't know how he's still playing, he borrows money every time just to play...
FiduciaInDio 7 months ago
@djdiddles99 he is up about 400k he doesn`t have to play that much...
andreshkobeful1 6 months ago
@djdiddles99 In Texas you can go to jail for that!
Raghy07 6 months ago
@djdiddles99
Forgot the "and 400 dollars already in because of small blind" :P
joole5005000 6 months ago
@djdiddles99
He was up over $400,000. That's life changing money for the money broke mouth.
GOLDSILVERDUDE 5 months ago
@djdiddles99 he is folding.what you think he is doing?
yellow6100 4 months ago